impacts of agricultural development projects on gender relations in farming households
TRANSCRIPT
Impacts of Agricultural Development Projects on Gender Relations in
Farming Households (A Case Study of Blantyre rural,
Malawi)Presented at the Agricultural Investments, Gender and Land in Africa Conference
in Cape town, South Africa
ByLoveness Msofi
Presentation Outline▪ Background
information
▪ Research problem
▪ Objectives
▪ Methodology
▪ Results and discussion
▪ Conclusions
▪ Recommendations
2
Background Information (1/3)▪ Agriculture remains the backbone of Malawi's economy. The sector contributes
over 30% to GDP, over 80% of the country’s employment most of whom are women.
(GOM, 2010)
▪ All the gender categories (men, women and youth) are involved in Malawian agriculture though in different activities depending on the gender roles and the priorities of these gender categories .
(Hirschmann and Vaughan, 1984)
3
Background Information (2/3)
Women farmers
Subsistence food
production
Commercial Production
Agricultural labour force
Food security
Household welfare
Economic development
Figure 1. The Roles of Women Farmers in Malawian Agriculture, NSO (2010)
4
Background Information (3/3)
Worldwide, there are things that are no longer a dispute, women are involved more in agriculture and they spend more time farming than men (World Bank, 1991; Saito, Mekonnen, and Spurling, 1994)
In Malawi, 70% of full time farmers are women (GOM, 2010)
GOM and NGOs have generated interventions to empower women and to improve their conditions in the agricultural sector since their role is crucial for the improvement of people’s livelihoods and for economic growth of the country.
5
Research Problem▪ Donors have been called to mainstream gender issues in projects. But
what is not known is how such gender framing translate into project actions and the impacts of such actions on gender relations.
▪ It was therefore the aim of this research to determine the extent to which gender is mainstreamed in the projects implemented by the government and other donors in the agriculture sector.
▪ The study involved a critical look at the gender components articulated in the project documents of the selected projects, investigated the translation of this articulation on the ground and also determined the impacts brought about by the projects on gender relations at household level.
6
Research Objectives
Main objective• The main purpose of this research was to analyse the impacts of
agricultural development projects on gender relations within the farming households in the rural area of Blantyre district where different agricultural development programs/projects are being implemented
Specific objectives• To analyse the gender components in the project documents of the
projects being implemented in the study area in relation to the situation on the ground.
• To analyse the gender relations existing among different gender categories in the households in the study area.
• To understand the impact of agricultural development programmes on gender relations in farming households in the study area.
7
Methodology
Study area Lunzu EPA and Ntonda EPA - BlantyreRespondents Farmers = 58 extension workers =3Sampling techniques Purposive sampling Systematic random sampling
Sampling plan
Data Primary and secondary Survey instrumentsQuestionnaire and checklistData collection methodsIndividual face to face interviews, focus group discussion and key informant interviews
Data collection
SPSS frequencies and percentages, cross-tabulations and Chi-square
Statistical
analysis
8
Figure 2: ASWAp Focus Areas, Support Services and Crosscutting Issues
9
Description of the Projects
Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and Agricultural Development Project▪ GOM project funded by the World Bank and
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
▪ The major project development objectives are
▪ To raise agricultural productivity, and net incomes of poor rural households in the targeted districts in a sustainable manner by providing an integrated package of support covering irrigation, agricultural/irrigation advisory services, marketing and post-harvest support.
▪ To strengthen recipient institutional capacity for long-term irrigation development.
▪ Components
▪ Irrigation Rehabilitation and Development
▪ Farmer Services and Livelihoods Fund (FSLF)
▪ Institutional Development and Community Mobilization
▪ Project Coordination Unit, and Monitoring and Evaluation
10
Gender Narratives in ASWAP and IRLADP
ASWAP
• Developing gender analysis and mainstreaming at all levels starting with focal points
• Providing gender training to frontline staff
• Promote research and extension that is gender sensitive
• Gender sensitivity during targeting• Advocate for gender mainstreaming
in agricultural policies.• Production of gender policy
strategies and enforcing the implementation
IRLADP
• Awareness on gender issues during project community sensitization and mobilization
• Gender data collection during Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
• Identify gender empowerment opportunities for vulnerable groups and resource poor farmers
• Gender issues included during targeting and monitoring
11
Table 1: Gender Division of Labour Before and After the Projects
ACTIVITIES ASWAp IRLADP
Productive activities
Crop production
Livestock
production
Before
After
Before
After
Men and women All gender
categories
All gender
categories
All gender
categories
Men All gender
categories
Men and
women
Men and women
Reproductive activities Women Men and
women
Men, women
and girls
Men and women
Community activities Men and women Men and
women
Men and
women
Men and women
12
Results and Discussion (1/4)
Table 2: Control and Access to Resources and Benefits Before and After the Projects
GENDER ROLES ASWAp IRLADP
Before After Before After
Control over
resources
Men Men and
women
Men and women Men and women
Control over
benefits
Men Men and
women
Men and women Men and women
Access to resources Men and
women
Men and
women
Men and women Men and women
Access to benefits All gender
categories
All gender
categories
All gender
categories
All gender
categories
13
Results and Discussion (2/4)
Table 3: Decision Making Before and After the Projects
DECISION ASWAP IRLADP
Before After Before After
Crops to be grown Men Men and women Men and women Men and women
Livestock to be kept Men Men and women Men and women Men and women
Selling farm produce Men Men and women Men and women Men and women
Buying farm
equipment and inputs
Men Men and women Men and women Men and women
How to use farm
income and other
farm products
Men Men and women Men and women Men and women
Land use Men Men and women Men and women Men and women
14
Results and Discussion (3/4)
Table 4: Impacts of the Projects on Gender Relations
Gender Relations ASWAp IRLADP
Gender division of labour Yes No
Control over resources and benefits
Yes No
Access to resources and benefits
Yes No
Decision making Yes No
15
Results and Discussion (4/4)
Conclusions ▪ Gender narratives were well articulated in the ASWAp project document and
they give a clear direction for the implementation of the specific activities to address gender issues and they are budgeted for.
▪ In the IRLADP project document, the gender issues are mentioned but they do not give a clear guide for implementation and the only emphasis is on participation of women in the project activities which cannot be clearly tracked on the ground.
▪ ASWAp unlike IRLADP has had an impact on the gender relations regarding division of labour, control and access to resources and benefits and decision making such that after the project, there is improved participation of the gender categories in the different activities
▪ There are other very important factors such as culture which may have an impact on the gender relations and other factors such as gender of household head which also have a great impact on the gender relations.
16
Recommendations ▪ To achieve gender mainstreaming the gender narratives should clearly
be articulated in the project documents including specific strategies and guidelines for implementation which should be provided to the project implementers.
▪ The projects should also provide clear mechanisms to track the actual implementation of the activities and the impact on the ground
▪ Other important factors such as culture should be taken into consideration when planning for gender mainstreaming activities since they play a great role in influencing the gender relations.
17
18
Thank you for listening