ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

24
Ilana Kovach Chemistry 1405 Lab Final Review Ilana Kovach

Upload: ilana-kovach

Post on 23-Jan-2018

4.054 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Chemistry 1405 Lab Final

Review

Ilana Kovach

Page 2: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 1: Graphing & Data Analysis

Manual Excel

H2O (πŸ’. πŸ‘πŸ“ βˆ’ 𝟎. πŸ–)

πŸ’. πŸ‘πŸ“βˆ’. πŸ•πŸ“

.9861g/ml

|. πŸ—πŸ–πŸ”πŸ βˆ’ 𝟏. 𝟎

𝟏. 𝟎| βˆ— 𝟏𝟎𝟎

1.39% of Error

Mass 4.5ml

.9861 *4.5 = 4.437g

.9994g/ml

|. πŸ—πŸ—πŸ—πŸ’ βˆ’ 𝟏. 𝟎

𝟏. 𝟎| βˆ— 𝟏𝟎𝟎

.06%Error

Mass 4.5ml

.9994 *4.5 = 4.497g

Ethanol (πŸ‘. πŸ– βˆ’ 𝟎. πŸ’πŸ“)

πŸ’. πŸ–πŸ“ βˆ’ 𝟎. πŸ“πŸ“

.7791g/ml

|. πŸ•πŸ•πŸ—πŸ βˆ’ 𝟎. πŸ•πŸ–πŸ—

𝟎. πŸ•πŸ–πŸ—| βˆ— 𝟏𝟎𝟎

1.25% Error

Mass 4.5ml

.7791 *4.5 = 3.506g

.7889g/ml

|. πŸ•πŸ–πŸ–πŸ— βˆ’ 𝟎. πŸ•πŸ–πŸ—

𝟎. πŸ•πŸ–πŸ—| βˆ— 𝟏𝟎𝟎

.013% Error

Mass 4.5ml

.7889 *4.5 = 3.550g

Page 3: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Which Slope More Accurate? Prior to the experiment I knew excel was more accurate in calculations; however due to

actually determining the actual percentage of error in comparing the manual method

verses the Excel method proved my hypothesis. The percentage error is about 1% different

in comparison which might seem small but makes a difference. Small calculation

differences such as density can determine if a random substance floats or sinks. Both have

very small differences to the real number but from my experience of learning hand making

a graph is more prone to human errors. I am thankful for the person who incorporated the

option to transform my data in Excel into a graph.

Page 4: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 2: Calorie Content

Prelab:

1. Specific is the heat required to raise the temperature of the unit mass of a given

substance by a given amount

2. Energy needed in joules to raise a temp of 250ml of water from 22ΒΊC to 45ΒΊC

(Density of H2O =1.00g/ml & Specific Heat= 4.184J)

a. Q=mCβ–²T

Q= (250*1) (4.184) (45-22)

Q=24,060J

b. Convert to Kcals

24060J * πŸπ’„π’‚π’

πŸ’.πŸπŸ–πŸ’π‘± *

πŸπ’Œπ’‚π’„π’

πŸπŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπ’„π’‚π’

5.75Kcal

3. A .50g sample of vegetable oil gives out 19.9kJ of Heat when burned. What is the

caloric value of the oil in kcal/g?

19.9kJ*πŸπ’„π’‚π’

πŸ’.πŸπŸ–πŸ’π‘± *

πŸπ’Œπ’‚π’„π’

πŸπŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπ’„π’‚π’ = 4.76kcal

πŸ’.πŸ•πŸ”π’Œπ’„π’‚π’

.πŸ“π’ˆ *2 = 9.52Kcal/g

4. Carbs(150), Protein (50) & fats(7)

(50*4) + (150*4) + (7*9) = 863kcal

5. Formula for calculating %Error

|π‘¬π’™π’‘π’†π’“π’Šπ’Žπ’†π’π’•βˆ’π‘¨π’„π’•π’–π’‚π’

𝑨𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍 |*100 = Percentage of Error

Post lab: 1. Heating water is….

An endothermic process because the water is absorbing Heat. The water

Temperature rising shows it absorbed the Heat.

2. Based on Net heat calculations burning food is…

An exothermic process because the food was releasing Heat.

3. NOT same caloric content as manufacture

a. Percent of error with the popcorn was 13.8% and marshmallow 91.3%

b. Each popcorn vary in size and marshmallow vary in size

c. Heat was released not in a trapped controlled area

d. Only one experiment needs more trials to be accurate

Page 5: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Popcorn Marshmallow

a. Mass of food material

before heating 0.9578 1.2776 b. Mass of food material

(ashes) left after heating .7914 0.3089 c. Mass of the food material

burned

*(a-b)

0.1664 0.987

d. Volume of water sample 50ml 50ml

e. Mass of water

(Density 1.00)

*D=π’Ž

𝒗

50g 50g

f. Tinitial

25.8ΒΊC 25.6ΒΊC g. Tfinal

36.0ΒΊC 30.0ΒΊC h. β–²T

10.2ΒΊC 4.6ΒΊC i. Heat absorbed by water

in Joules 2133.84J (50)(4.184)(10.2)

1046J (50)(4.184)(10.2)

j. Convert

*JCal Kcal .51kcal 2133.84*

𝟏π‘ͺ𝒂𝒍

πŸ’.πŸπŸ–πŸ’π‘±*

πŸπ’Œπ’„π’‚π’

πŸπŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπ’„π’‚π’

.25kcal 2133.84*

𝟏π‘ͺ𝒂𝒍

πŸ’.πŸπŸ–πŸ’π‘±*

πŸπ’Œπ’„π’‚π’

πŸπŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπ’„π’‚π’

k. Caloric content of food

cal/g (J/C) 3.1kcal/g .51/.1664

.26kcal/g

.25/.987

l. Caloric content of food

cals/serving(manufacture) 3.6kcal/g 3.0kcal/g m. %of error |

πŸ‘.πŸβˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ”

πŸ‘.πŸ” |*100 =

3.8%

|.πŸπŸ”βˆ’πŸ‘.𝟎

πŸ‘.𝟎 |*100 =

91.3%

Page 6: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 3: Electronic Structure

Prelab:

1. Equipment for flame Test…

Bunsen burner, Tube, Strikers, Metal ions, solutions and sample swabs

2. What is happening at atomic level to give rise to observed energy??

Excited electron drops and emits radiation (photon) depending on the amount of

energy released color results vary

3. Why does each salt have its distinctive flame test color?

Each element has different electron configuration which determines how much

energy is released when electrons fall from an excited state which result in a

different color.

Post lab: 1. Line spectra of different elements related to observed unaided eye

Closer light was to white the more color was saw.

2. Will everyone see all light in all emission spectra

No can’t see all colors without a spectroscope!

3. Representation of all transitions???

NO!!! ONLY see what is visible to the Human Eye

ROY G BIV (Increasing Energy)

Page 7: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Name of Gas Color to Naked

Eye

Observed line spectra

Krypton White R,O,Y,G,V

Neon Red R,O,Y,G

Argon Pink R,O,Y,G,V

Xenon White R,O,Y,G,V

Helium Salmon Y,G,V,B,R

Hydrogen Pink R,O,Y,G,B,V

Gas Tube Emission Spectra

Flame Test

Metal Color of Flame Potassium Chloride Light Pink

Calcium Chloride Orange (Bright)

Copper Chloride Blue rimmed in Green

Strontium Chloride Red (bright)

Sodium Chloride Yellowish/Orange

Page 8: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 4: Nomenclature

Ionic Bonds

Metal & Nonmetal

Potassium Chloride

KCl

Naming is simply the name with the second word ending in -ide

Ionic Bonds

Transition Metals

Iron III oxide

Fe2O3

Naming transition metals use (#) to indicate what ion is used in the Formula

Covalent Bonds

No Metals

Diphosphorus Pentoxide

P2O5

Use prefixes such as:

Mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, Hexa, Hepta-, Octo-

Ionic Bonds with Polyatomic

Ions

Ammonium Sulfate

(NH4)2SO4

Polyatomic Ions to Know:

NH4+, CH3COO-,

CN-, CO32-, ClO2

-

, ClO3-, ClO4

-, NO3

-, OH - ,PO43-

, SO42-

Page 9: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 5: VSEPR

Bent

Trigonal

Pyramidal

Bent

Linear

Trigonal Planar

Tetrahedral

Page 10: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 6: Making Hand Cream

MISSING pH Homogeneity Appearance Cooling

Effect

# 1

Nothing 8.5 Homogenous Snow White Cool YES

# 2

Mineral Oil 8 Homogenous Really White Yes &

Sticky

#3

Methyl

Stearate 8

Homogenous Thick & White Yes &

Sticky

#4

Glycerin 8 Homogenous White, Thick &

Creamy

No

#5

Triethanolam 8 Homogenous Yellowish No

Page 11: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Missing Ingredients Effect on

Hand Cream Sample # 1: Everything Present This sample seemed the most similar to traditional lotion one would find in a local store

subtracting the fragrance.

Sample #2: Mineral Oil missing Mineral oil provides spreadibility. Mineral oil helps trap water in the skin by creating an

oily later on top of the skin. The reason this happens is due to the nonpolar properties. The

mineral oil missing seem to come out as a substance having a sticky feel rather than the

desired smooth feeling.

Sample #3: Methyl stearate missing The purpose of methyl stearate is to assist the desired texture which people associate with

lotion. I notice that the lotion missing this ingredient outcome still had the sticky texture

which would not be a desirable product. However it was still contain the thick/white

properties. This substance was also nonpolar.

Sample#4: Glycerin Missing Glycerin surprisingly is a polar ingredient. Reason I previously thought it wasn’t was due

to my mom owning pure glycerin suggested by her dermatologist. I associated glycerin to

the feeling of petroleum jelly. β€œIt never seems to come off by water alone if applied. The

lotion absent of glycerin seemed greasy, white/; thick and creamy. Researching glycerin

this makes more sense in that glycerin is polar and the way it reacts with skin is bring

water to the surface layer causing your deeper dermis to dry out. However the effects alone

are not as strong in a combination with an oil.

Sample #4: Triethanolamine missing Also called TEA. This chemical is an organic compound derived from ammonia when used

in low concentration to be an alkalizing agent and increase pH in cosmetics. Interesting

note when combined to stearic acid which is present in all the lotions forms a mild soap

thus this chemical acts as an emulsifier in lotion to breakdown bonds and allow water

(polar) Ingredients mix with nonpolar ingredients making ionic bonds. Also interesting the

lotion appearance outcome had a yellowish appearance which questions if color is due this

ingredient. Extra: emulsion by reducing surface tension so water soluble & oil soluble can

blend.

Page 12: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Correlation between Polarity & Effects

on Hand Cream?

Sample 2(Mineral Oil) & 3(Methyl Stearate):

Non polar Properties missing The outcome correlation resulted in the substance being sticky with just the mineral oil

missing and methyl stearate missing could this be related to its properties of being

nonpolar missing? Understanding mineral oil the properties and methyl stearate they

contribute a large part to the texture in the desired smooth feeling so I believe the nonpolar

properties missing could possibly be culprit.

Sample 4(Glycerin) & 5(Triethanolam):

Polar properties missing Glycerin which has polar properties seem to contribute in making the substance than my

original thought. Seems glycerin may subtract excess water. However Triethanolamine

missing has polar properties MAINLY however has some nonpolar properties as well

which means it has an important factor in emulsification so the end result without it didn’t

seem to different… This was tricky I came to realization stearic acid also acts as an emulsifier so in reality we should have tested this substance subtracted from the mix as well simultaneously.

Most Important Ingredients of Lotion? I believe the most important foundational ingredients of the hand cream at minimum needs

to include water H2O and Lanoline Yellowish wax. The reason water is because

the purpose of water is to provide moisture; however moisture is not good enough if you

can’t absorb it and that is exact the purpose of lanolin which helps your skin actually

absorb the moisture. The basic of lotions purpose is to moisturize the skin and cure dry

skin.

Page 13: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Calculate $ to make 10fl oz. of

hand cream 7.5g Triethenolumine 5β‚΅

3.0g Glycerin 11β‚΅

30.0g Stearic acid 43β‚΅

3.0g Methyl Stearate 12β‚΅

30.0g lanoline 11.11β‚΅

30ml Mineral oil 25β‚΅

10oz $2.77

A product of traditionally bought store lotion could sell for

$20.00

When determining Probability also consider:

Advertising & Packaging

Profit margin Per Bottle:𝟐𝟎.πŸŽπŸŽβˆ’πŸ.πŸ•πŸ•

𝟐𝟎.𝟎𝟎 * 100

86%

Page 14: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 7: Physical &Chemical Changes

#

Observations

Physical

Change

Chemical

Change

Gas

Produced

(If Any)

1 3CuSO4 + 2Fe(s) 3Cu(s) + Fe2(SO4)3

a.) 30sec the steel wool changed color β€œpinkish”

b.) 15min the color completely no longer black charcoal and

the copper (II) sulfate dissolved the wool.

N/A

2 Zn(s) + 2HCl(aq) ZnCl2 + H2(g)

Bubbles immediately meaning hydrogen gas must be present.

Hydrogen is flammable. In the experiment the Flame went out

However the reaction was expected to light the splint.

Hydrogen

Gas

3 ZnCl2 (aq) (β–²Heat) ZnCl2(s)

The residue compound on the watch glass went from an Aqueous

solution to a solid state. This is essentially a β€œphase change”. N/A

4 AgNO3 + HCl HNO3 + AgCl

Liquid Became cloudy and salt began to form

N/A

5 CaCO3(s) + 2HCl CaCl2 + CO2 + H2O

The aqueous solution turned yellowish. Calcium Carbonate

reacted to form calcium chloride, Water and a nonflammable gas

proven by splint test of Carbon dioxide.

Carbon

Dioxide

Gas

6 4Cu(s) + O2(g) 2Cu2O

When the Copper Wire was exposed to the fire it produced a black

solid Copper(I) Oxide

N/A

7 2Mg(s) + O2(g) 2MgO

When Magnesium was exposed to the fire; the Mg ignited turning

from silver to white and shriveled up.

N/A

8 2KClO3(S) (MnO2(s) /β–²Heat) 2KCl +3O2(g)

When splint placed in tube it light back on fire meaning the

product produced oxygen gas.

Oxygen

Gas

9 CaCO3 + β–²Heat CaO +CO2 (g)

No change; but was supposed to… to breakdown calcium

carbonate into calcium Oxide and CO2 Gas. The splint test was

expected to blow out the flame to show CO2 was Produced.

Carbon

Dioxide

Gas

10 I2(s) (β–²Heat) I2(g) I2(s)

Iodine Solid vapor rises and crystallized on the bottom of the dish.

(similar H2O phase changes) N/A

Page 15: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Conclusion These experiments enhanced my understanding of physical and chemical Changes. In Experiment

#3 and #10 were examples of physical changes. The reason these two experiments were

demonstrating physical change is because they were showing a phase change; similar to that of

water changing states from solid, Liquid and gas. In experiment 3 the zinc chloride an aqueous

solution when heated up product resulted in Zinc chloride in a solid state. The residue compound

solidified on the watch glass. Experiment 10 the iodine solid when heated became a gas and then

crystallized on the bottom of the dish. Since the Iodine in the equation is merely just iodine

changing states of matter it would be considered a physical change. Chemical changes were further

comprehended in depth by clarifying physical changes distinctions and showing observations that

translate to being a chemical change.

In Experiment 1 Steel wool (Iron III) was placed in a blue solution Copper Sulfate. After 30sec the

steel wool changed a pinkish color and after 15min the color completely no longer black charcoal

and the copper II sulfate dissolved the wool. This reaction is an example of a single replacement

reaction. In Experiment 4 AgNO3 and Hydrochloric Acid liquid became cloudy and salt began

forming into HNO3 and AgCl.

Another way to see if a chemical reaction took place is by placing the metal in a Bunsen burner. For

instance in Experiment #6 when the copper wired was exposed to fire it produced a black solid

Copper (I) oxide. And Experiment #7 Magnesium was exposed to the fire it ignited and shriveled up

and turned into magnesium oxide. These types of experiments are clearly observable

The third method used when experiments used the splint test to see if any gases were produced such

as hydrogen gas, oxygen gas or Carbon dioxide gas. In Experiment #2 the zinc and Hydrochloric

acid when doing the splint test was supposed to relight the flame however our experiment did not

turn out with expectations. The product should have left a highly flammable gas hydrogen.

Experiment #5 was calcium carbonate and Hydrochloric acid. The splint test proves the equation

when the flame went out suggesting that carbon dioxide was in the product of the reaction. In

Experiment #8 KClO3 when heated the splint test suggested Oxygen gas must be in the product of

the reaction because it light back up. The final Experiment performed with the splint test method

was CaCO3 heated which during the actual experiment did not appear to have a reaction. However

since with knowledge of the equation balancing carbon dioxide was supposed to be produced and be

proven by blowing out the flame in the splint test.

As a whole, the various experiments give a more thorough comprehension of Chemical reactions

and how they work and what really happens when a chemical reaction is taking place. Overall each

chemical reaction has fundamental grounds in keeping an equilibrium of a balanced equation but

changing variables around is happening beyond the human eye.

Page 16: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 8: Balancing Equations & Types

Combination

A+ B AB

Decomposition

AB A + B

Single Replacement

A + BC AC + B

Double Replacement

AB + CD AD + CB

Combustion

CxHy + ZO2 (g) XCO2 (g) + 𝒀

𝟐 H2O (g)

ALL elements on the Reactant and Product side need to Equal (=)

Page 17: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 9: Stoichiometry Prelab:

1. Chemical Reactions for All 3 Theoretical Decomposition Reactions

NaHCO3 NaOH(s) + CO2 (g)

2NaHCO3 Na2O(s) + 2CO2 (g) + H2O (g)

2NaHCO3 Na2CO3(s) + CO2 (g) + H2O (g)

2. 4.2g of sodium bicarbonate is Equivalent to how many moles of sodium bicarbonate

4.2gNa2CO3 * 𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

πŸ–πŸ’π’ˆπ‘΅π’‚π‘―π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ = .05moles NaHCO3

3. Using the number of moles calculated in question 2 How many moles & Grams

(theoretical Yield) of solid product can be produced in each of the possible

decomposition reactions

.05mol NaHCO3 * 𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑢𝑯

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ *

πŸ’πŸŽ.πŸŽπ’ˆ 𝑡𝒂𝑢𝑯

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑢𝑯 = 2.00g NaOH

.05mol 2NaHCO3 *𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘Ά

𝟐 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ *

πŸ”πŸ.πŸŽπ’ˆ π‘΅πŸπ‘Ά

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘Ά = 1.58g Na2O

.05mol 2NaHCO3 *𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

𝟐 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ *

πŸπŸŽπŸ”.πŸŽπ’ˆ π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ = 2.65g Na2CO3

4. Using decomposition Reaction #1 and the theoretical Yield calculated above, what

would be the percent yield be if the experimental yield was 1.85g π‘¬π’™π’‘π’†π’“π’Šπ’Žπ’†π’π’•π’‚π’

π‘»π’‰π’†π’π’“π’†π’•π’Šπ’„π’‚π’ * 100 = % Yield

𝟏.πŸ–πŸ“

𝟐.𝟎𝟎 * 100 = 92.5%

Page 18: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Experiment

a. Mass of Empty & Clean Crucible 39.3116g

b. Mass of the crucible & sodium Bicarbonate 43.9932g

c. Mass of Sodium Bicarbonate used in the

Experiment (B-A)

(43.9932- 39.3116)

4.6816g

d. Moles of Sodium Bicarbonate used in the

Experiment

4.6816g Na2CO3 * πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

πŸ–πŸ’π’ˆπ‘΅π’‚π‘―π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

0.0057mol

e. Mass of the crucible and decomposition product

after 1st heating

42.263g

f. Mass of the crucible and decomposition product

after 2nd heating

42.2560g

g. Mass of Decompostion (F-A)

(42.2560g-39.3116g)

2.9444g

Page 19: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Post lab:

1. Using the number of moles calculated in question 2 How many moles & Grams

(theoretical Yield) of solid product can be produced in each of the possible

decomposition reactions

.0557mol NaHCO3 * 𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑢𝑯

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ *

πŸ’πŸŽ.πŸŽπ’ˆ 𝑡𝒂𝑢𝑯

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑢𝑯 = 2.228g NaOH

.0557mol 2NaHCO3 *𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘Ά

𝟐 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ *

πŸ”πŸ.πŸŽπ’ˆ π‘΅πŸπ‘Ά

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘Ά = 1.7267g Na2O

.0557mol 2NaHCO3 *𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

𝟐 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ *

πŸπŸŽπŸ”.πŸŽπ’ˆ π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΅π’‚πŸπ‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ = 2.9521g Na2CO3

2. Which Theoretical Yield Agrees with the Experiment Yield?

The Experimental yield was 2.9444g; the closest of the Theoretical yields is the

third one 2.952lg Na2CO3. It’s a little odd that it was above the number of

theoretical compared to experimental but it was clearly the closest.

3. Which balanced chemical reaction actually occurred during the Experiment?

2NaHCO3 Na2CO3(s) + CO2 (g) + H2O (g)

4. Using decomposition Reaction #1 and the theoretical Yield calculated above,

what would be the percent yield be if the experimental yield was 1.85g

𝟐.πŸ—πŸ’πŸ’πŸ’

𝟐.πŸ—πŸ“πŸπŸ * 100 = 99.7% Yield

Comment: Even though our Experiment was very close to the actual

number there could always be reasons why it’s not exactly 100%

#1 may we didn’t burn it enough but highly unlikely

#2 weighting is never perfect

Page 20: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 10: Boyle’s Law 1. Boyles Law?

The law stating that the pressure and volume of a gas have an inverse relationship

2. Mathematical Equation

P1V1= P2V2

3. New Pressure?

Given: (15mL, 21Ml & 740torr) (πŸπŸ“)(πŸ•πŸ’πŸŽ)

(𝟐𝟏) = 925mmHg or Torr

4. Convert R (atm kPa) & (L mL)

8.206 * π‘³βˆ—π’‚π’•π’Ž

π’Žπ’π’βˆ—π‘² *

πŸπŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπ’Žπ’

πŸπ‘³ *

𝟏𝟎𝟏.πŸ‘π’Œπ‘·π’‚

πŸπ’‚π’•π’Ž = 8313

π’Žπ‘³βˆ—π’Œπ‘·π’‚

π’Žπ’π’βˆ—π’Œ

5. Room Temperature Convert to Kelvin

23ΒΊC +273 = 296K

6. n= 𝑺𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆

𝑹𝑻

πŸπŸπŸ—πŸ‘

(πŸ–πŸ‘πŸπŸ‘)(πŸπŸ—πŸ”) = 5.25 * 10-4 moles

7. 5.25* 10 -4 mol * πŸ”.πŸŽπŸβˆ—πŸπŸŽπŸπŸ‘π’Žπ’π’π’†π’„π’–π’π’†π’”

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† = 3.16 * 1020 molecules

8. (3.16 * 1020 molecules) * (πŸ‘.πŸ–βˆ—πŸπŸŽβˆ’πŸπŸ’π’Žπ’)

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’†π’„π’–π’π’† = 1.20 * 10-3

volume of Gas in a 20mL syringe

9. % Empty Space 𝟐𝟎.πŸŽπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸπ’Žπ‘³

πŸπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³ * 100 = 99.994% empty space in 20mL

10.% Empty Space 𝟏𝟎.πŸŽπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸπ’Žπ‘³

πŸπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³ * 100 = 99.988% empty space in 10Ml

Page 21: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Conclusion: Based on my previous knowledge I know gas molecules

are farther apart in relative comparison to solids and liquids. Gases have properties

that include having no definite shape or volume. Therefore the container it’s in such

as a room for instance fills the Entire space. The Kinetic Energy Laws states that gas

moves rapidly and are elastic. This Experiment brought statistics to Life. In that the

reality is gas is mainly made of empty space. My data stated in a 20ml space that

only 0.0012 represented the volume of the gas. The syringe in reality was mostly

empty space with 99.994% and when decreased to 10mL the amount of empty

space only decreased by .0l% stating 99.988% which is very little in

comparison to the amount we compressed the volume to change. If one takes a step

back in the thought process; empty space can be answered by the simplest

component of matter an atom. An atom structure contains the nucleus which

contains most of the mass with protons/neutrons and electrons surrounding the

nucleus mostly consist of space. This structure of an atom was proven by the

Rutherford experiment. The experiment performed shots against a gold foil and the

results were that a few times the shot was deflected; which would be the nucleus.

However most of the laser shots went right through. In reality mostly space applies

to all matter. However gas molecules are farther apart which vary depending on the

size of the container and if converted to be made into a solid it would be VERY

small. Why? Cause gas takes up very little space when condensed. Overall in

comparison a Gas contains mostly of space even more than solids and liquids

because of its unique properties.

Page 22: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

Lab 11: Acids, Bases & pH

I. pH of Various Solutions

Solution pH Paper pH meter

1.0M HCl 1 1.36 Vinegar 3 2.97 Ammonia 10 11.30 1.0M NaOH 11 13.07 Tap Water 6 6.5

Do pH values agree with 2 Different Methods?

YES, however the pH meter is more precise, there is slight difference but in general fairly close in pH values. Predict if Basic or Acidic?

Drain Cleaner = Basic Soft Drink = Acidic Bleach = Basic Lemon Juice = Acidic

Page 23: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

II. Antacids Antacid Mass (g) Drops of 1.0M HCl

CaCO3 0.127 64 NaHCO3 0.1002 55 Mg(OH)2 0.1000 41

1) CaCO3 + 2H+ H2O + CO2 + Ca2+ 2) NaHCO3 + H+

H2O+ CO2 + Na+ 3) Mg (OH) 2 + 2H+ 2H2O + Mg2+

Should it take the same # of drops to neutralize the same Mass?

0.127g CaCO3 * πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘ͺ𝒂π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

𝟏𝟎𝟎.πŸŽπŸ—π’ˆ π‘ͺ𝒂π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ * πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑯+

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† π‘ͺ𝒂π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ * πŸπ’ˆ 𝑯+

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑯+ = .0025g

.1002g NaHCO3 *

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘

πŸ–πŸ’.πŸŽπŸπ’ˆ 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπŸŽπŸ‘ * πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑯+

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑡𝒂𝑯π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ * πŸπ’ˆ 𝑯+

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑯+ = .0012g

.1000g Mg(OH)2* πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΄π’ˆ(𝑢𝑯)𝟐

πŸ“πŸ–.πŸ‘πŸπ’ˆ π‘΄π’ˆ(𝑢𝑯)𝟐 * πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑯+

𝟏 π’Žπ’π’π’† π‘΄π’ˆ(𝑢𝑯)𝟐 * πŸπ’ˆ 𝑯+

πŸπ’Žπ’π’π’† 𝑯+ = .0034g

CaCo3 and Mg(OH)2 Chemical Equations based on the ratio of moles of hydrogen ions to the antacid needs more drops to neutralize. The experiment resulted in 64 drops which was CaCO3 was significantly higher than the NaHCO3 . However the Mg(0H)2 seemed to not perform based on expectations. There could be a number of reasons the number was lower. Maybe since this solution differed in waiting to dissolve verses fizz. The experiment wasn’t perfect but could easily been human error since drops can vary in size and are not always consistent. All together the concept taken is the chemical equation emphasizes the ratio of H+ ions compared to solution that was neutralized.

Extra Strength Acid contained 750mg of CaCO3 in a single

tablet: assume 20 drops per mL how many mL? Of l.0M HCl

would one of these tablets neutralize? .75g CaCO3 * 𝟏

𝟎.πŸπŸπŸ•π’ˆπ‘ͺ𝒂π‘ͺπ‘ΆπŸ‘ * πŸ”πŸ’π’…π’“π’π’‘π’”

𝟏 * πŸπ’Žπ‘³

πŸπŸŽπ’…π’“π’π’‘π’” = 19mL 1.0M HCl

Comment: That is a large #, so maybe antacid works despite professor Pribich thought of β€œthe placebo effect” many drugs have the placebo effect that comes into play when determining if a drug/medication works. However from an unbiased viewpoint the experiment is suggesting it actually does have a REAL effect.

Page 24: Ilana kovach (chemistry lab final review)

Ilana Kovach

III. Buffers

What was the Initial pH difference

6.96-4.19 = 2.77

PH difference after 1 drop? & 2?

3.82- 2.90 = .92 3.28- 2.44 = .84

Did the buffer do what the Buffer should do?

YES the buffer helped stabilize the pH. The ionized water without a pH buffer significantly dropped becoming very acidic when hydrochloric acid was added. When the pH 4 buffer was introduced and Hydrochloric acid was added the numbers was more stabilized near the pH of 4 just as expected should have been done.

Initial

pH

pH after 1

drop HCl

pH after 2

drops HCl

Deionized Water 6.96 2.90 2.44 pH 4 Buffer 4.19 3.82 3.28