icao updates-ip3rev5.pdf

Aviation Safety

Global Update

Michiel Vreedenburgh Chief, Implementation Planning & Support

Air Navigation Bureau, ICAO

COSCAP-NA SC/15, Xiamen, China 13 – 15 May 2015

Regional Implementation – Safety

19 May 2015 2

GASP

Established Regional Priorities, Indicators & Targets

Regional Dashboards

Annual Regional Aviation Safety Report

Annual Global Aviation Safety

Report

Annual ANC/Council Review

Revised RASG Work Programme

Annual RASG Meeting Reports

Next GASP 2016

RSOOs

COSCAPs

Alignment of Regional Bodies

RASGs

RASG-APAC

REGIONAL ACCIDENT RATES REMAIN LOW

Preliminary Figures for the State of Global Aviation SAFETY

3 14 April 2015

SNEAK PEEK

AN UPTICK OF FATALITIES IN THE LAST YEAR

GLOBAL ACCIDENT RATE CONTINUES TO BE STABLE

TOP HIGH-RISK OCCURRENCE CATEGORIES REMAIN TO BE RS, LOC-I, CFIT AN UPTICK OF FATALITIES IN THE LAST YEAR GLOBAL ACCIDENT RATE CONTINUES TO BE STABLE REGIONAL ACCIDENT RATES REMAIN LOW TOP HIGH-RISK OCCURRENCE CATEGORIES REMAIN TO BE RS, LOC-I, CFIT

Risk Distribution for the Top 3 Safety Priorities Scheduled commercial above 5 700kg for 2010 - 2014

19 May 2015 4

RASG-APAC

WORLD RECOMMENDATION

Continue focus

on the Top 3 Safety

Priorities (RS, CFIT, LOCI)

Source: SPACE (iSTARS v2) (https://portal.icao.int/space)

Higher than world average

https://portal.icao.int/space

19 May 2015 5

Regional Progress Against APAC Priorities & Targets for Safety

31/12/2023

SAFETY

RASG-APAC Priorities and Targets

(RASG-APAC/4 – November 2014)

http://www.icao.int/safety/DashboardsDocumentation/APAC Priorities and Targets for Safety and AN (APAC).pdf





2 February 2015 6

RASG-APAC

Global Plans

SARPs & PANS

Training, Guidance and Tools

Implementation Planning & Support

Measure, Monitor & Report

Compliance & Verification

Needs Analysis & Validation

19 May 2015 7

http://www.icao.int/meetings/advancedATM/

http://www.icao.int/meetings/mpl/

Existing Implementation Kits (iKITs) – 2012

• Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU) Block 0

• Performance-based Navigation (PBN)

– 2013

• Aircraft Operator Certificate (AOC)

• Safety Management

– 2014

• Runway Safety

– 2015

• Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS)

• Performance-based Navigation (PBN) – Updated Version

19 May 2015 8

http://www.icao.int/safety/Implementation/Pages/IKits.aspx

Implementation Kits (iKITs) for 2016 • Initial steps to improve demand/capacity balancing

• Facilitate recognition through the harmonization of airworthiness regulatory

approvals

• Improved Efficiency of Surface Operations

• Enhancing Safety at Aerodromes

• Improved Throughput at Aerodromes

• Early steps towards user-preferred routing

• Optimized aerodrome departure/arrival rates under

all meteorological conditions

• Advanced ATM Procedures for TMA Efficiency

(updated and expanded PBN iKit)

• In-Flight Accident Reduction Tool

19 May 2015 9

RSP Achievements - 2014 • Published RST Handbook

• Launched RS i-Kit

• RRSS (AFI, SAM & MID)

• Runway Safety KPIs WG – IATA coord. – Workout Sessions 7-8 May’14, 27–28 Oct’14 and Teleconf 27 Jan’15

• Regional Dashboards – RS accidents

• RST & SMS implementation & effectiveness – ACI

survey

• Runway Safety Go-Teams – methodology selection

criteria, pilot mission

• RS Go-Team missions

• On-line list of Aerodromes

• ACI APEX Airport Safety Reviews

• IATA Airport Analyses

• US FAA National Runway Safety Plan 2015 – 2017

10

RSP Plans for 2015 and beyond • Revise RST Handbook – early 2015

• Translate RST Handbook into some languages –

after revision

• PANS-Aerodromes 1st edition – Nov 2015

• Annex 14 Vol. I Amendment – Nov 2016

• PANS-Aerodromes 2nd edition (Chapter 5) – 2017/8

• USOAP audit protocol questions on RSTs

• Runway Safety KPIs WG – IATA coord.

• Runway Safety Go-Team missions (incl. follow-up)

• ACI APEX Airport Safety Reviews

• IATA Airport Analyses

• IATA Unstabilised Approach Guidance

• US FAA Focused Airports List

03 March 2014 11

Recommendations

• Runway Safety

– RASGs to analyze regional runway safety data and develop

related Safety Enhancement Initiative & Detailed

Implementation Plan

– Airports to implement Runway Safety Teams (RST) and

SMS

– Airports make use of the ICAO Runway Safety iKit and RST

Handbook

– Airports to request ICAO Runway Safety Go-Team visits

and/or ACI APEX Airport Safety Review

19 May 2015 12

Annex 19 - Implementation

• Third Edition, Doc 9859, was published on 8 May 2013

Restructured according to the SSP and SMS Frameworks (Annex 19)

Contains detailed guidance and tools for SSP and SMS implementation

• ICAO Safety Management Website: http://www.icao.int/Safety/SafetyManagement

• ICAO Safety Management I-Kit http://cfapp.icao.int/tools/SMikit/story.html

• Regional Aviation Safety Groups, RSOOs and COSCAPs

http://www.icao.int/Safety/SafetyManagement

http://www.icao.int/Safety/SafetyManagement

http://cfapp.icao.int/tools/SMikit/story.html

Timeline - Annex 19 Amendment 1 Proposal • ANC Preliminary Review

• Consultation period:

Ref: SL AN 8/1-14/47

• ANC Final Review

• Council Adoption of Amendments

• Applicability as determined by Council

19 May 2015 14

June 2015

July 2015

Sept 2015

Nov 2015

Mar 2016

November 2016 or beyond

Annex 19 – Future Work Items

• Development of guidance material to support SSP provisions

• Development of guidance material to support SMS provisions

• Development of coordinated emergency response plan provisions

• Enhanced provisions for the collection, analysis and exchange of

safety data and safety information

• Further development of SMS and SSP implementation and

assessment tools

• Extension of the applicability of the SMS provisions

• Enhance provisions for the integration of SMS and SSP activities

Safety Management Training Programme • Consistent and cost-effective methodology is necessary

• ICAO started the development of a new approach to teaching safety management – Updated with the latest Standards

– Use of tools and exercises relevant to real-life scenarios and best practices

16

Course Structure • A Standardized Training Package with blended learning approach:

Online + Classroom

• Online enables participants to receive homogeneous instruction on safety management

• Classroom activity safety management concepts applied through a case study similar to the one they will face in the workplace

17

State Safety Briefings

• Launched during the HLSC 2015

• Now Available for States at the secure iSTARS/SPACE portal

• Provides a general overview of the different safety aspects per State

– Shows different indicators to measure aviation safety in a State

– Shows a comparison of the State in the context of any regional grouping

19 May 2015 18

19

Regional Dashboards

Annual Global Reports

Global Plans

Annual Regional Safety Reports

Global, Regional and State Nested Reporting

Information Feed

Safety Status by State

Measuring progress at all levels

14 April 2015

Recommendation 2/1 b) 3)

Implementing SSP

ICAO should improve and harmonize the defined SPIs taking into account those currently in use

Regional Priorities and Targets

19 May 2015 20

Common set of Indicators as a baseline

Using readily available

data

Proposed Safety Performance Indicators (HLSC/15-IP/1 Appendix)

• Effective Implementation of Safety Oversight System

• Progress in SSP Implementation

• Progress in SMS Implementation

• Frequency and Severity of Accidents and Incidents

• Certification of Aerodromes

• Significant Safety Concerns

• Presence of notable hazardous conditions

• Fleet Modernization

• Effectiveness of Foreign Operator Safety Assessment

Programmes

• Industry Certification

• Extent of Environmental Hazards

19 May 2015 21

Expanding the Framework for Performance Measurement

• By the end of 2015, ICAO will establish a framework for:

– States to start measuring against a core set of indicators as a baseline

– States to choose their applicable / related proposed Safety Performance Indicators

– States to validate ICAO information related to the proposed Safety Performance Indicators

– States to report to their respective RASGs and Regional Offices

• Establish a framework for Regional and State performance measurement

19 May 2015 22

Draft May 2014, for internal use only

SSP SPI

• The State should – Establish lower consequence safety and/or quality

indicators with appropriate target and alert monitoring (mature ALoSP).

– Safety indicators development and selection should be congruent to the State‘s safety objectives and safety policy.

– They should be appropriate and relevant to the scope and complexity of the State‘s aviation activities.

– Periodic monitoring of the safety indicators for any undesirable trends, alert level breaches and target achievement should be performed.


Indicator Types

• Activities indicators are designed to help identify whether enterprises/organisations are taking actions believed to lower risks – Audit score – Inspection results

• Outcome indicators are designed to help measure whether such actions are, in fact, leading to less likelihood or severity of an accident occurring – Number of fatalities – Accident rate


SPI Development Plan

1. Define your Goals (Small sentence and rational) 2. Define your aggregation levels 3. List your data sources and link to aggregation levels 4. Define key indicators, helper metrics and

development needs for each goal

Recommendations for COSCAP-NA States

• States be more active on the OLF, especially completing PQ self-assessments on OLF and CAP implementation progress

• Alignment of RASG and COSCAP regional actions

• States to request ICVM and/or off-site validation once ready to improve EI score by validation of actions

• States to focus on SSP implementation and report progress and results on ICAO gap analysis tool

• States to focus on PBN implementation

• Secretariat commended report by COSCAP-NA to RASG-APAC and recommended all COSCAPs and PASO report on results to every RASG-APAC meeting

26 19 May 2015

Second High-level

Safety Conference

Some of the Major Outcomes during the HLSC

• Global Tracking

– Member States endorsed the GADSS Concept of Operations

– Plans for adoption of a new 15 minute aircraft tracking standard was also

endorsed

• Performance-based, allowing airlines the choice of several available and planned

technologies and procedures

• Proposal was sent to Member States on 25 February

• Expected to be adopted by ICAO Council this fall

• Applicability date of 2016

– ICAO is working with industry on an implementation initiative

• To assist States, ANSPs, and airlines in the implementation of the standard and

respond to abnormal flight behavior in an integrated and multidisciplinary manner

28 19 May 2015


• Conflict Zones

– HLSC supported ICAO’s comprehensive risk mitigation work programme

– Including:

• Online repository hosted by ICAO, which will serve as a single public source for up-to-date risk assessments from States and International Organizations

• Harmonization of terminology used for risk assessments

• Comprehensive review of existing requirements and message formats

• Industry-led initiatives to share operational information and be more transparent with passengers on conflict zone risk methodologies being applied

19 May 2015 29

Conflict Zone Information Repository (CZIR) Public interface

14 April 2015 30


• Effective and Efficient Regional Collaboration

– HLSC agreed on the importance of regional collaboration to improve safety

• Recommended that aviation safety partners, including donor States, international organizations, industry and financial institutions, collaborate with ICAO to assist States to improve aviation safety

– ICAO to lead the alignment and coordination of regional initiatives to improve safety, implement the GASP objectives, and achieve the regional safety targets.

• Recommended that States, International Organizations and industry increase their participation in and contributions to the ICAO and partner regional safety mechanisms, including support to the activities of the RASGs with resources.

– ICAO develop a resource mobilization strategy and implementation plan to increase resources, assistance activities and implementation assistance capacity.

• ICAO to participate in the development of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

• States, international and regional organizations and industry increase contributions to the ICAO Voluntary Funds including the Safety Fund (SAFE) and Human Resources Development Fund (HRDF).

19 May 2015 31

Ongoing Focus by ICAO

• The integration of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) into civilian airspace

• Continued adoption of proactive safety management approaches in States

• Provisions on the sharing and protection of safety information

• Full and expedited implementation of Performance-based Navigation (PBN) regulatory oversight

• Sustain the Collaborative Arrangement for the Prevention and Management of Public Health Events in Civil Aviation (CAPSCA) programme to assist States prepare for and respond rapidly to any new public health event

• The need for all ICAO States to be sufficiently assisted so as to reach global minimum levels of effective safety oversight

19 May 2015 32

GLOBAL EVENTS

19 May 2015 33

ICAO / UNOOSA Aerospace Symposium (18 – 20 March 2015)

• Symposium Outcomes:

– General consensus that commercial space transportation will happen • Initially from remote locations with segregated traffic, evolving to full integration

– For the moment, no international regulation is required

– Strategy: Preparation and education of all stakeholders

– How to engage on the subject with ICAO / UNOOSA • Be at the table - join the ICAO / UNOOSA Space Learning Group at www.icao.int/aeroSPACE

• Share your experience and concerns related to integration of airspace

• Commitment is not resource intensive – high value for low cost

– Second ICAO / UNOOSA Aerospace Symposium is scheduled for next year in 2016, hosted by the United Arab Emirates

19 May 2015 34

http://www.icao.int/aeroSPACE

RPAS Symposium 23 – 25 March 2015

• Comprehensive Picture:

– RPAS and UAS are everywhere

– RPAS must fit into the aerospace

system

– Existing frameworks provide

foundation

– States need guidance for national

regulations

– Harmonization of national

regulations to support international

operations

– Regulations are ahead of SARPs

• Conclusions

– Government / Industry collaboration

(civil and military)

– Terms and Definitions (RPAS Manual,

Annex 2 and Annex 7)

– Operational procedures (civil and

military)

– Spectrum utilization

– Safety oversight methodology

– Safety management at all levels

(Feedback loops)

35 14 April 2015

ICAO-WHO CAPSCA Global Symposium 28 – 30 April 2015, ICAO Headquarters, Montréal, Canada

• Collaborative Arrangement for the Prevention and Management of Public Health Events in Civil Aviation (CAPSCA)

• CAPSCA achievements and lessons learned

• considered public health preparedness planning and response in the aviation sector - How to prepare for an outbreak; latest guidance and plans, Ebola Virus Disease outbreak; etc.

• Future for CAPSCA and multi-sector collaboration

36 14 April 2015

www.icao.int/Meetings/CAPSCA2015

• Theme: No Country Left Behind

• Unique symposium focused on implementation, allowing:

– States to highlight their priority needs – ICAO to showcase available assistance and success stories

• Participants:

– States, industry, international and regional organizations, and financial institutions

• Objectives:

– Support ICAO Resource Mobilization Strategy – Secure collaborative support from donors and partners on voluntary contributions and

ICAO coordination role

19 May 2015 37

Global Aviation Development Implementation Symposium (GADIS) 24 – 26 November 2015, ICAO Headquarters, Montréal, Canada

More info. will be available soon at: www.icao.int/Meetings/GADIS

BACKUP

19 May 2015 39

Regional Support Mechanism Strategies

• Objectives and Work Programmes

– Aligned and complementary

• RASGs

– Data driven approach by region

– Regional priorities and targets aligned with the GASP

– Focus mitigation measures on risk areas

– All aviation stakeholders

• States, international organizations and industry

• RSOOs and COSCAPs

– Support improvement of State’s EI levels

Regional Safety Oversight Organizations (RSOO)

• Regional solutions tailored to national challenges

• Faster improvement of safety oversight capabilities

• Increased effectiveness and efficiency by sharing experience and resources

• Achieve higher compliance quicker and with less resources

• Greater international representation and recognition for member States

• Readiness to deploy and implement assistance

• Advice based on other member’s experience

• Supported by ICAO Assembly Resolution and

HLSC Recommendation

19 May 2015 41

2 February 2015 42

RASG-APAC

Asia/Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Team (APRAST)Co-Chaired by State (Singapore) and Industry (IATA)

Asia Pacific Safety Reporting and Programme AWG (AP-SRP)

Vice-Chairs; State (Australia) and Industry (Boeing)

Accident Investigation Group (APAC AIG)

Chairperson (Singapore)Vice-Chair (Australia)

RASG-APACChairperson (Sri Lanka)

Vice-Chair (Hong Kong China)

Information Analysis Team (IAT)(Australia and Boeing)

Secretariat, APAC Office

Safety Enhancement Initiatives WG (SEI WG)

Pending election in April 2015

RASG-APAC Chair: Mr. H. M. C Nimalsiri, DGCA Sri Lanka

Vice-Chair: Capt. Victor Liu, Assistant DG of Civil Aviation Department, Hong Kong, China

2 February 2015 43

• Region’s Priorities and Targets

http://www.icao.int/safety/pages/regional-targets.aspx

RASG-APAC

SAFETY

RASG-APAC Priorities and Targets

(RASG-APAC/4 – November 2014)






2 February 2015 44

RASG-APAC

2 February 2015 45

RASG-APAC

• Outputs and deliverables

– Two Annual Safety Reports (early 2015)

– Development of safety tools for States and industry

• model regulations, model advisory circulars, guidance materials and training material to address CFIT, LOC-I and RS, foreign air operator surveillance database

– Accident/Incident Investigation • Code of Conduct on Cooperation

• Database of APAC investigation bodies

2 February 2015 46

RASG-APAC

• Region’s Challenges

– Level of participation still below expectation

– Very low response to State Letters and surveys

– Extremely low implementation of SEIs by State and industry

– Maintenance of interest and dedication by voluntary facilitators and champions

– 18 our of 36 States (50%) are still below the GASP target of 60% EI

• Web link • http://www.icao.int/APAC/Pages/RASG-APAC.aspx

http://www.icao.int/APAC/Pages/RASG-APAC.aspx



Recommendations • Runway Safety

– RASG-APAC to analyze regional runway safety data and develop related

Safety Enhancement Initiative & Detailed Implementation Plan

– Airports to implement Runway Safety Teams (RST) and SMS

– Airports make use of the ICAO Runway Safety iKit and RST Handbook

– Airports to request ICAO Runway Safety Go-Team visits and/or ACI APEX

Airport Safety Review

• Controlled Flight Into Terrain

– RASG-APAC to analyze regional CFIT events and develop related

Safety Enhancement Initiative & Detailed Implementation Plan

– Information-sharing and analysis on regional Terrain Avoidance and

Warning System alerts might be beneficial for safety management

19 May 2015 47

Safety Management Training Programme • Consistent and cost-effective methodology is necessary

• ICAO started the development of a new approach to teaching safety management – Updated with the latest Standards

– Use of tools and exercises relevant to real-life scenarios and best practices

48

Course Structure • A Standardized Training Package with blended learning approach:

Online + Classroom

• Online enables participants to receive homogeneous instruction on safety management

• Classroom activity safety management concepts applied through a case study similar to the one they will face in the workplace

49

Course Objectives

• personnel involved in SSP/SMS implementation with the knowledge, skills and attitudes to advocate SMS requirements and guidance material, as well as the acceptance/oversight of service providers’ SMS.

• service providers’ staff with the basic knowledge, skills and attitudes to implement, administer or participate in SMS operations.

50

This course will provide :

Expected benefits

• SSP/SMS implementation plans based on the ICAO frameworks

• Resolution of safety-related issues by applying the required skills and knowledge associated with the key SSP/SMS processes, such as: – hazard identification and risk mitigation (HIRM)

– safety data collection and processing systems

– safety performance indicator development, measurement and monitoring

51

Expected benefits

• Improve the level of compliance with SM SARPs

• Facilitate the development of safety management training programmes by and for regulatory and service provider personnel

• Enable States and operators to interact effectively in the resolution of safety-related issues

52

Course Demo

53

Module 1 : Safety Management Fundamentals Module 2 : ICAO Safety Management Provisions Module 3A/B : State Safety Programme Safety Management Systems

Course Demo

214/01/ICAO TDC Rev 3.3 TRAINAIR PLUS 54

Course Demo



SPI Development


SSP SPI

• The State should – Establish lower consequence safety and/or quality

indicators with appropriate target and alert monitoring (mature ALoSP).

– Safety indicators development and selection should be congruent to the State‘s safety objectives and safety policy.

– They should be appropriate and relevant to the scope and complexity of the State‘s aviation activities.

– Periodic monitoring of the safety indicators for any undesirable trends, alert level breaches and target achievement should be performed.


SPI Pyramid


Digitization

Event

Airport

Airline

Collect characteristics about entities

Database

Entity records


Building Metrics

Entity records

Database(s)

Metrics

Count

Sum

Average

Select

Categorization

Sum of y

Number of x

Average of z

Rate of r per t

Percentage of p


Metrics catalogue

• Keep you metrics in one place

• Publish the metrics for transparency and reusability


Indicators

Metrics

Sum of y

Number of x

Average of z

Rate of r per t

Percentage of p

GOAL (Improve

Safety, etc.)

Select metrics for which it was

determined that they help achieve

the goal

Number of x

Indicator

Rate of r per t

Indicator


Indicator Types

• Activities indicators are designed to help identify whether enterprises/organisations are taking actions believed to lower risks – Audit score – Inspection results

• Outcome indicators are designed to help measure whether such actions are, in fact, leading to less likelihood or severity of an accident occurring – Number of fatalities – Accident rate


Key Indicators

GOAL

Select indicators which 1. can be targeted, and 2. which can be acted

on 3. Mix outcome and

activity

Objective

Goal

Number of x

Key Indicator

Number of x

Indicator

Rate of r per t

Indicator


Example: Millenium Indicators Objective

Goal Key Indicator

Proportion of x


Example: Millenium Indicators


ICAO Global Aviation Safety Plan


ICAO GASP Objectives


European Safety Plan


Belgian Safety Plan


CAA UK Objectives (CAP784)


Dutch Objectives


Dutch Vision

What are your

objectives?

82


SPI Development Plan

1. Define your Goals (Small sentence and rational) 2. Define your aggregation levels 3. List your data sources and link to aggregation

levels 4. Define key indicators, helper metrics and

development needs for each goal

icao updates-ip3rev5.pdf

Documents