how standards support bim projectsmddb.apec.org/documents/2013/scsc/wksp5/13_scsc_wksp5_010.… ·...

___________________________________________________________________________

2013/SOM3/SCSC/WKSP2/010 Session 4

How Standards Support BIM Projects

Submitted by: Stanford University

Joint APEC-ASEAN Workshop - How Building Information Modeling Standards

Can Improve Building Performance Medan, Indonesia

24-25 June 2013

7/6/2013

1

Building Professionals

www.wilshirewestacupuncture.com

Building Professionals

empowered by

BIM & VDC

www.wilshirewestacupuncture.com

www.kendeaton.com

Virtual Airline Pilot.com Seattle Symphony

Source: AIASource: AIA

Sutter Medical Center Castro Valley2012 AIA BIM/TAP Awards

Al ta Bates Summit Medical Center2012 AIA BIM/TAP Awards

Miami Valley Hospital Southeast AdditionCleveland, Ohio

Source: Skanska

CAVECad & SoniCAVE ResearchUC San Diego

Source: Ev e Edelstein

Dr. Calvin Kam PhD, AIA, PE, LEED AP

American Institute of Architects - National2010 - 2011 Chair, Technology in Architectural Practice2011 – 2013 Co-Chair, Center for Integrated Practice2013 – 2015 Board Knowledge Committee

www.aia.org/tap

7/6/2013

2

BIM Awards 2005-2013

KAREN KENSEK LUCIANA BURDIPhD

PETE EVANSAIA

EVE EDELSTEINASSOC AIA PhD F-AAA

JEFFREY OUELLETTEASSOC AIA

ANDY SMITHAIA

CALVIN KAMAIA PE PhD LEED AP

KRISTINE FALLONFAIA

2013 CHAIR ACTIVE PAST CHAIRSKIMON ONUMA

FAIASTEPHEN HAGAN

FAIA CCMTONY RINELLA

ASSOC AIA

TECHNOLOGY in ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE ADVISORY GROUP

DAVID R SCHEERAIA AICP LEED AP

2014 CHAIRBRIAN SKRIPAC

ASSOC AIA LEED AP

Award-Winning BIMTrend-Setting Innovation and Excellence in the Nine Years of AIA BIM Awards

Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM

Beijing National Swimming Centre, China

COAA Owners’ Choice BIM Awards New Construction Award1 Bligh Street, SydneyArchitectus + ingehoven architectsAccepting the award:

Delivery Process Innovation Using BIM HONORABLE MENTIONSan Ysidro Land Port of EntryThe Miller Hull Partnership

7/6/2013

3



Stanford University [[email protected]]CIFE Director of Industry ProgramsConsulting Assistant Professor

San Mateo County Health Center, CA

(c) 2012

Is there a path from any department in the health center to any other department within the center at all times?

http://c ife.stanford.edu/online.publications/TR101.pdf

3D + 4D on Walt Disney Concert Hall

• $200 Million USD project• Complex geometry, tight

site• 3D CAD model available

from architect• Construction phase• General Contractor hired

intern for 6 months• Push limits of 4D

1999-2000 Mortenson & Stanford-CIFE

Education

Professionals

Stanford UniversityVDC Certificate Program

USA

Sweden

China

7/6/2013

4

Camino Medical Of fice Building Case Study© DPR Construction, Inc.

Net ROI of Building Camino Virtually

Net Return on Investment (ROI) anticipated to be at least 200% the initial expenseCost is less than 0.5% of constructionReturn from just one subcontractor (Southland) greater than the costBenefits dependent on everyone participating in the process

Miami Valley Hospital Southeast Addition, OHBuilding Prefabrication

Source: Skanska

• Improved Safety & Quality – Av erage Industry LTIR (Lost Time Injury Rate)=1.9

• Archived = 0

• Cost Savings

• Anticipated 1-2% Construction Cost

• Reduced Waste - * Waste Removal Cost in other hospital projects range from US$11 to 2.75/m2

• Estimated Waste Removal Cost = US$2/m2

• Reduced Manpower Peak

7/6/2013

5




GSA National 3D-4D-BIM Program [[email protected]]Co-Founder & Senior Program Expert (contractor)

U.S. General Services Administration

• 8,700 buildings

• 350 million square feet

• 2,100 communities

• serves >1 million federal workers

• >200 major capital projects

• valued at $12 Billion USD

• $5 Billion USD Stimulus

PBS 3D-4D-BIM Program

GSA Office of Design and Construction

GSA Public Buildings Service

provides national leadership, coordination, and guidance to all GSA regions on design, construction, art, urban development, secur ity, accessibility, sustainability, and Building Information Modeling (BIM).

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Space: 089 NC1s3D Coordination BIM—Spatial

4D Phas ing BIM—Energy 3D Las er Scanning

PBS OCA 3D-4D-BIM Program

GSA’s National 3D-4D-BIM Program

From introduction in 2003 to pilots and technology/guidance development,

to upper management policy and budgetto GSA national program deployment and

support to US national standardsto international

agreements

Mandated Requirement on all GSA Projects since 2006

100+ Projects To Date

16 National Contracts up to $30 million each

International Collaboration among Public Owners

• joint statement in support of BIM, open standards and collaboration

• public owners from USA, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands (Jan 2008)

• Estonia, Iceland, Mexico (Sep 2011)

• Australia? China? Japan? Korea? Singapore? UK?

7/6/2013

6

PBS OCA 3D-4D-BIM ProgramGSA’s National 3D-4D-BIM Program





bimSCORE [[email protected]]Founder & CEO

We can use proven methods to improve outcomes, and scientifically measure our BIM / VDC performance gains

http://radialinfo.com

33

A Scientific Approach to BIM & VDC Implementation

34

PLANNING

ADOPTION

TECHNOLOGY

PERFORMANCE

4 Areas1 ScoreS

core

card

Fra

mew

ork

OBJECTIVES

STANDARDS

PREPARATION

ORGANIZATION

PROCESS

MATURITY

COVERAGE

INTEGRATION

QUANTITY

QUALITY

10 Divisions 50+ MeasuresFORMALIZATION

BEP / VDC CONTENT

MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES

BIM / VDC PROCESS ROLES

MODEL USE PHASES

MODEL USES

3D COVERAGE

INTEROPERABILITY

TRACKING

USER EMOTION

BIM / VDC INTENT

GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT

IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET

PROJECT INVOLVEMENT

KNOWLEDGE SHARING

BIM / VDC SOFTWARE

LoD ADEQUACY

INFORMATION LOSS

QUANTITATIVE PERFORMANCES

QUALITATIVE PERFORMANCES

STAKEHOLDER BENEFIT

OBJECTIVE CATEGORIES

SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY

BIM / VDC INVOLVEMENT

MEETING EFFICIENCY

BIM / VDC HARDWARE

LoD SUPPORT

BUSINESS IMPACT

BENEFIT VALIDATION

MODEL USE ALIGNMENT

ETCETC

ETCETC

Source: vdcscorecard.stanford.edu Source: bimSCORE

© 2013 bimSCORE

GPS for BIM Journey

© 2013 bimSCORE

PORTFOLIOPROJECTPROJECT

2013 Q12012 Q3 2012 Q498

Conf idence Level

SCHEDULE

on-site labor hours

unit of manufacture

Prefabrication Indicator

% Components prefabricated

Off-site labor hours v. on-site labor hoursTime per component/unit of manufactureCost per component/unit of manufacture

Off-site labor cost

On-site laydown use

Off-site labor cost

On-site laydown use

% Components prefabricated

M2

M4

M1

M3

M5

M6

Prefabrication Indicator

PROJECTPROJECT PORTFOLIO

2013 Q12012 Q3 2012 Q498 124

80

158

170

132

73%

124

113

85

Prefabrication Indicator 124

113

M4 - Cost per Component / Unit of Manufacture

$23,000.00

$13,500.00

Labor cost / Component

Material Cost / Component

Shipping Cost /Component

Labor O&P /Component

Material O&P /Component

$2,000.00

$12,500.00

$1,400.00

Target: $60,000.00

Total: $52,400.00

M4 Cost per Component / Unit of Manufacture 113

7/6/2013

7

© 2013 bimSCORE

bimSCORE

0% 25% 50% 70% 85% 100%

Conventional Practice

Typical Practice

Advanced Practice

BestPractice

Innovative Practice

Conf idence Level

Project Comparison

PROJECT PORTFOLIOSeven Dwarfs MineSeven Dwarfs Mine Train

✔

Grand Floridian Annex Grand Floridian Annex

✔

Castle Fantasy FaireCastle Fantasy Faire

✔

Performance

Technology

Planning

Adoption

Status-Quo Piloting Policy Industry Innovation

Source:

Building upon our experiences from America, Asia and Europe,

bimSCORE has summarized the success of a economy’s BIM journey into 5 characteristics

Status-Quo Piloting Policy Ecosystem Innovation

Source:

How are we performing today—metrics?

What is the cost and impact of status quo?

Can we “afford” not using BIM?

Laborious & Manual Approach

Efficient & Automated Approach

Source: Associated Press

41

Source: Tekla, Tokyo Sky TreeSource: http://wn.com/workers_stadium

Laborious & Manual Approach

Efficient & Automated Approach

USA: Construction Productivity

Source: Paul Teicholz, CIFE

7/6/2013

8

Singapore: Construction Productivity

Source: Singapore’s Productivity Performance of Economics Division Ministry of Trade and Industry

Singapore’s GDP and Productivity Growth Sectoral Productivity Growth(3-Year Mov ing Av erage)

Construction vs. Manufacturing

PER CENT PER ANUNM

MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTIONSource: Singapore’s Productivity Performance of Economics Division

Ministry of Trade and Industry

• Labor Productivity comparisons can be deceiving

• One must also consider Employment Growth

• The Focus should be on Value Added Growth

© 2012 bimSCORE

45

Investment $ $ $

© 2012 bimSCORE

46

Investment $ $ $

$ / time $ $ $$$$$$$$$$$

© 2012 bimSCORE

47

Investment $$$$$$$$$vs.

Value ☺ Happiness Sickness Sustainability Emergency

bimSCORE © 2013 CIFE, Stanford University © 2013 48

Highspeed Train Stations

28 83 14618 52Daily High-Speed Railway Weekday Departures

Current operation of select high-speed services included in study

6 4 264 4High-Speed Railway Tracks

6 4 264 4High-Speed Railway Platforms

4.7 trains/p 20.8 trains/p 5.6 trains/p4.5 trains/p 13 trains/p

Daily Platform Average Turnover Rate (departures/ platforms)

London St. Pancras Int’l.

Berlin Main Station

TokyoStation

Beijing SouthStation

Paris Gare du Nord

15 28 2634 12

Total Railway Tracks

7/6/2013

9


West Kowloon Terminus


a

b

e

f

b

f

c

c

d

g

h

ed

g

ah

Images: OpenStreetMap, West Kowloon Cultural District Authority, MTRC

J1 | Open Space

M1 | Growth (hectares)

4.6 haJ2 | Landscaped Space Anticipated 2020

Current

18.7

12.7

6.0ha6.0 ha

M1 | Growth (hectares)

1.5km (750m walking radius)

\Landscaped Space

Societal ImpactsPublic Space




Berlin Main Station

TokyoStation


Paris Gare du Nord

first opened 1868 CO-LOCATED CIQEUROSTAR INT’L. OPERATIONS







TokyoStation


Paris Gare du Nord

opened 2006 FOCUS ON SUBTERRANEAN PLATFORMS52 OF 83 DAILY HS DEPARTURES

Berlin Main Station



Economic Impacts

a

b

e

f

i

b

f

c

West Kowloon 2020

c

d

g

h

ed

g

a

h

PREDICTION OF MARKET & ECONOMIC IMPACTS


InnovativeConventional

BenchmarkWith World Class Stations

Conventional



Innovative

Station Location & AccessStation Location & AccessConnectivity

Pedestrian

Urban

Urban Development and RenewalUrban Development and RenewalSocietal Impacts

Culture

PublicSpace

Distances and timeDistances and timeCirculation

ArrivalDepartureAccessible

Back of House


Back of HouseCirculation


Back of House

Current Practice

Quality of Passenger ExperienceQuality of Passenger ExperienceExperience

Spatial EnvironmentQuality of Time

ComfortHuman Factors


Berlin Main Station

TokyoStation


Paris Gare du Nord



Areas

Dimensions

stationSCORE

Passenger Departures6 Measures w/

7 Journeys

Passenger Arrivals 6 Measures w/

7 Journeys

Accessible 6 Measures w/

4 Journeys

Back of House 4 Measures w/

4 Journeys

Spatial Environment 8 Measures w/18 Journeys

Quality of Time 5 Measures w/

18 Journeys

Comfort 6 Measures w/ 18 Journeys

Human Factors 5 Measures w/

18 Journeys

Culture 1 Measure w/

3 Journeys

Public Space 1 Measure w/

2 Journeys

Passenger Experience Circulation

SocietalImpacts


Pedestrian 4 Measures w/

7 Journeys

Urban 4 Measures w/

9 Journeys

Connectivity

• 100% quantifiable• 65% based on actual measurements• 35% based on expert researcher

assessment

625 Total Measurements

7/6/2013

10


Source:

Swimming & Cycling – inform go/no-go

Align performance targets with BIM Pilots

Investment, Case Studies, Metrics of Success

© 2013 bimSCORESource: www. http://www.senaatti.com/

Assess state-of-the-art technologies and information standard:

» Object-Oriented Product Modeling

» 4D Modeling

» Industry Foundation Classes

» Virtual Reality—CAVE

» Thermal Comfort and Energy Simulation

» CFD Analysis

» Lighting Simulation

» Automated Cost Estimating and Scheduling

» Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

2000: Product Modeling and 4D Modeling

See how your building works during design

displacement cooling mixed coolingSnapshots cour tesy of Gr anlund, Helsinki, Finland

When selecting the heating/cooling strategy during conceptual design, consideroperations performanceoperations costinstallation costs

Energy Cost

ANNUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND COSTMWh Heat. Cool. Fan Light Equip. Other

total elec. elec. elec. elec. elec.Jan 12.4 0.00 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0Feb 11.2 0.00 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0Mar 8.2 0.00 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0Apr 5.5 0.00 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0May 1.7 0.18 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0Jun 0.2 0.57 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0Jul 1.2 0.04 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

Aug 0.4 0.06 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0Sep 2.7 0.00 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0Oct 5.5 0.00 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Nov 7.1 0.00 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Dec 9.9 0.00 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0Sum 66.1 0.8 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

OTHER ELECT RICITYEQUIPMENT ELECTRICITYLIGHT ING ELECTRICITY Heating ene.: FIM/MWh (VAT not incl.)FAN ELECT RICITY Electric ene.: FIM/MWh (VAT not incl.)COOLING ELECTRICITY Cooling electr icity: Electricity consumption ofHEATING compressors, condensers and c irculation pumps.

158.40270.00

kW h/m² kWh/m³

99.4 23.5

0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0

28.8 6.81.3 0.3

MWh

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

MWh/a

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100FIM/a

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

7/6/2013

11

Page 61Page 61

Electrical Design

StructuralDesign

Direct IFC Exchange

4D Simulation

VisualizationLighting simulation

ConstructionEstimating

FacilitiesManagement

ArchitecturalDesign

MechanicalDesign

Energy Simulation

0

30

60

90

20

50MWh

EnvironmentalAnalysis

Comfort Simulation

Comp. Fluid Dynamic

Virtual reality

Life Cycle Cost

Constructionplanning

1 18 4 0 0 01 06 4 0 0 0

2 3 1 0 00 5 7 0 0 00

0

300 000

600 000

900 000

200 000

500 000

800 000

Ther m oNet ® P resent

ArchiCAD

MagiCAD

CFX

LCC/LCA

Lightscape RIUSKA

COVE 4D

Different applications require specific “bridges” and interpretations of 3D geometry. How should we construct and share a product model?

Reduce 3D polygons with texture map

Interior surface cont inuity

W all breaks atroom slab

Incorporat ion of thermal data

Boundary cont inuity and “watert ight”

Dist inct ion between material types

Geometry break down according to act ivit ies

Layering and naming comply with database

Architectu ral CAD

Cost Est imate & V alu e Engr. 3D+T ime V isu alizat ion

T hermal S imu lat ionLight ing M echanical Design

Compu tat ional Flu id Dy namics

Life-Cy cle Cost/Env ironmental Impact

Research Needs• Partial data exchanges

• Model Server approach

• Schema extensibility

• More pilot applications

Development Needs• More IFC import and export compatibilities

• Robustness of software applications

• Privilege and liability of the shared information

Optima Camelview, Arizona David Hovey FAIA

Parametric Design Automated Code Analyses

7/6/2013

12

Solar Studies Green Terrace Design

Day light Levels (lux) Day light Factor (%)

Energy Performance and Calibration Model-based Sequencing and Estimating

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000Monthly Electricity Usage (kWh)

Computer Simulation

Utility Bill

The Many Facets and Applications of Strategic Innovation

3D Visualization (Customer Communication/Mockup/Urban Study)

3D “Clash Detection” and Coordination

3D Production (Drawings and Fabrications)

3D Laser Scanning

4D Phasing (Tenants Move, Construction Sequence…)

Space/Program Validation

Energy Simulation

Circulation (occupants/vehicles), Egress, and Ingress Validation

Acoustic Simulation

Quantity Takeoff

Proforma and Financial Modeling

And more……

Strategic Innovation

Visualization Effective Communication

Production Efficiency, Value Adding Work

Coordination / Integration Risk Mitigation

Fabrication Accuracy, Efficiency

Validation Accuracy, Efficiency

Automation Accuracy, Efficiency

Simulation Informed Decision

Optimization Better Informed Decision

Smart Building On-Demand Controls & Access


Source:

Formalize Agency / Economy-wide Policy

Planning, People, Process, Technical

Repeatable, Enforceable, Measurable

7/6/2013

13

Teaming

Do you have all the “stars” aligned for your next project?

Spor ts Illustr ated 1991

Scoping

How do we juggle among BIM, IPD, and Sustainability?

www.etrainhub.com/juggling

andbe spectacular? be sustaining?

Client-Driven Innovation:

JustYourAverageJogger.comTheFinalSpr int.com

AK

Northwest/ArcticRegion 10

Rocky MountainRegion 8 Great Lakes

Region 5

Heartland Region 6

Greater SouthwestRegion 7

Southeast Region 4

Mid-AtlanticRegion 3

NewEnglandRegion 1

Pacific RimRegion 9

Northeast &CaribbeanRegion 2

HI

GU

VI

PR

DC

WA

OR

UT

MTND

WY

SD

CO

ID

CA

NV

AZ NMOK

TX LA

AR

NE IA

KS MO

MI

WI

ILIN

MI

OH

KY

TN

MS ALGA

FL

SC

NC

WVMD

VA

PA

NY

NJ

VT NH

ME

MACT RI

National Capital Region 11

PBS ODC 3D-4D-BIM Program

Business Case & Priorities — GSA BIM Guide Series

01—Overview

02—Spatial Program Validation

03—3D Imaging

04—4D Phasing

05—Energy Performance and Operation

06—Circulation and Security Validation

07—Building Elements

08—Facility Management

7/6/2013

14


Final Concept BIM

Life-Cycle BIM for Facility Management

Construction BIM

Work Order

Sustainable (and preventive) Maintenance

Small Project

Major Modernization

Design-Intent BIM

As-Built/Record BIM

Predictive Energy Modeling & MonitoringObjectives

excellence

sustainable

innovation

PBS Investment

Business Process

ODC programs

LEED

workplace 20.20

Objectives

conservation

satisfaction

operation

PBS Expenditure

Business Process

energy management

customer relations

performance measures

Information Basis

energy bills, survey/complaints,

walkthrough inspection, field measurements, reactive measures

Best Value Investment? Best Value Operation?Actual Data—verify if performance targets are met

Actual Data—allow proactive optimization and maintenance

And “Smart Building”

automatically feeds actual data

Maintenance and Repair Preparation

BIM & Facility Management

Smart Buildings

Envision Charlotte – Clinton Global Initiative | news.duke-energy.com | Duke Energy Center, Charlotte

• Smart Utilization & Consumption• Baseline and Scenarios

7/6/2013

15


Final Concept BIM

Life-Cycle BIM for Facility Management

Construction BIM

Equipment Information, Type, Warranty; Fabrication Model

IFC + NavisWorks + COBIE + Native ( tekla / cadduct / quickpen )

Design-Intent BIM

As-Built/Record BIM


Final Concept BIM

GSA BIM Guide Series 08

Program Target vs. Spatial Data, Energy Target vs. Predictions

IFC + Native ( .dgn / .pln / .rvt )


Aligning BIM with GSA Business Process


Space Measurement

Gross Building Area

Gross Design Area

Usable Area

Rentable Area

Efficiency

Volume

Public/Private Ratio

Fenestration Ratio

Skin to Floor Ratio

Portfolio/Property Management

STAR space type

STAR space category

Agency Bureau Code

Business Question: How does PBS validate whether the design meets our program during concept phase?

Basis for Spatial Program ValidaitonDuring Early Project Phases

GSA Business Assignment Guide (2005)ANSI-BOMA Standard (1996)Region’s SDM Formatting Standard


• A/E tabular reports and verbal responses

• 2D tracing of spaces to perform “polyline” area summation

• management of alterations over a building’s life-cycle

Turnaround, Interpretation of PBS Business Rules, ANSI/BOMA, Volumetric Characteristics, Manual vs. Machine Errors

7/6/2013

16

In the new El Paso Courthouse project, BPLW has chosen (by their discretion) to build a 3D BIM to support its construction documentation. We thank BPLW for sharing its BIM. We have conducted a review of the model and offered the following observations. However, the model presents a few areas of conflict


Space ObjectSpace NameSpace Number (ID)Occupant Org. NameClient Space Ty pe

BIM Measurement – Scenario 1

CORRIDOR

OFFICECOURTROOM

STAIR

ELEV.

GSA BIM AreaANSI/BOMA Usable Area

CORRIDOR

OFFICECOURTROOM

OFFICE

ELEV.

GSA BIM AreaANSI/BOMA Usable Area

BIM Measurement – Scenario 2

7/6/2013

17

97

Automated Validation PBS OCA 3D-4D-BIM Program

Gross Building Area 94,961Gross Measured Area 87,920Vertical Penetration Area 2,917Floor Rentable Area 85,003Usable Office Area 68,938Usable Building Common Area 4,706Floor Usable Area 73,644Floor Common Area 11,359Basic Rentable Office Area 79,571Basic Rentable Building Common Area 5,432Total Rentable Area 85,003USF/GSF 0.84Floor R/U 1.15

Typical floor area and efficiency from 1800-F (GSA CO) Building


The Drive for Open Standard

BIM VendorsAutodesk

Architectural DesktopRevit

BentleyGraphisoftOnuma* Nemetschek* Gehry Technologies* Beck Group

ConsultantsSolibriDigital Alchemy

100

Development, Validation, Calibration

Revit

Bentley Architecture

ArchiCAD

Onuma Planning System

ADT

101

GSA Net Areas Compared

• 7 floors 768 spaces• Wall thickness and window sizes vary and have an effect• Results will improve as some modeling problems as fixed

GSA Net Areas

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

1. Floor 2. Floor 3. Floor 4. Floor 5. Floor 6. Floor 7. Floor

OnumaInopsoGraphisoftRevitBentley

1. Floormin: 103,819max: 107,618diff 3.6%

102

Implementation of IFC PropertiesBentley

PSet PropertyRequired/Optional Value Type Property Name Value

GSA Design Gross Area Required area GSA Net Area values missing or wrongGSA Building Common Area Optional area Missing an optional property

PSet PropertyRequired/Optional Property Name Value

GSA STAR Space Type Required Enumeration GSA STAR Space Type okGSA STAR Space Category Optional Enumeration GSA STAR Space Category okANSI/BOMA Space Category Optional Enumeration ANSI/BOMA Space Category ok

GSA Net Area Required area GSA Net Area values missing or wrongGSA Usable Area Optional area Missing an optional propertyGSA Rentable Area Optional area Missing an optional property

Space Occupant PropertiesOccupant Organization Name Required String Occupant Organization Name okOccupant Organization Code Optional String Occupant Organization Code okOccupant Organization Abbreviation Optional String Occupant Organization Abbrev iation okOccupant Sub-Organization Code Optional String Occupant Sub-Organization Code okOccupant Bil ling ID Required String Occupant B ill ing ID ok

Security Zone Optional Enumeration Security Zone okPreservation Zone Optional Enumeration Preservation Zone okPrivacy Zone Optional Enumeration Pr ivacy Zone okProjec t Specific Zones Optional List Project Specific Zones

"Full Floor Spaces"

GSA Space Categories

GSA Space Areas

Space Occupant Properties

Space Zones

Spaces

GSA Space Categories

Space Zones

GSA Space Areas

GSA Space AreasGSA Space Areas

7/6/2013

18

103

Excel Sheet with Spatial Data BIM Report: Floor Plans by Tenant

PBS National 3D-4D-BIM ProgramOngoing 3D-4D-BIM Projects led by OCA:

Spatial Program Validation

Region 4 Tuttle Annex, GA

Region 5 Dirksen Federal Building, IL (and laser as well)

Region 6 Cedar Rapids Courthouse, IA

Region 10 Edith Green Federal Office, OR

R11/NCR 1800 F Street GSA Central Office, DCHCHB Dept of Commerce, DC St. Elizabeth’s Campus, DC (candidate; led by NCR)

BIM Guide Series 02: Spatial Program BIM

Minimum Requirement for Spatial Program BIM

All major projects that receive design funding in FY2007 and beyond are required to submit a spatial program BIM prior to final concept presentation.


Source:

Top-down & Bottom-upMandate + Sticks & Value + Carrots

Contractual Barriers, Incentive Alignments

Organic Business Environments

COAA Owners’ Choice BIM Awards Renovation / Retrofit AwardEdith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building ModernizationSERA Architects, Inc., General Services Administration, Region 10, Howard S Wright Construction CompaniesAccepting the award:

7/6/2013

19

7/6/2013

20

Good design makes a difference

AIA Documents Committee, National Convention 2008

AIA National | AIA-CC (2007)

building an integrated team early in the process

collaborative, open, intensified planning

participants share risk and apply common values, goals

appropriate technology

such as a single-purpose entity

© 2013 bimSCORE

Source: www. nationalbimstandard.org

© 2013 bimSCORE

Whole Building Design Guide

Source: www.wbdg.org

7/6/2013

21

© 2013 bimSCORE

National BIM Standard v2 (NBIMS)

Source: www. nationalbimstandard.org

© 2013 bimSCORE 122

Education:

Software Resellers:

Owners / Developers:

Contractors:

Consultants:

Agencies:

FUNDING PROVIDERS -

Source: buildingSMART Finland

© 2013 bimSCORE 123

Source: buildingSMART Finland


Source:

Evolutionary vs. Transformational

Sustainability - Productivity - Welfare

R&D with Global Partners

Imagine…

R E D U C I N G T H E C O S T O F S T E E L S T R U C T U R E S U S I N G C O M P U TA T I O N A L D E S I G N O P T I M I Z A T I O N

conventionaldesign method

FCD (128 cpu)

design method

PROCESS

Design cycle time 4 hrs 3 secAlternatives evaluated 39 12,800

Total design time 216 hrs 151 hrsPRODUCT

Total steel weight 2,728 met t 2,292 met t

Est. cost saving (USD)

- $4 M (-19%)

CASE STUDY RESULTS

GEOMETRIC MODEL

GEOMETRIC MODEL

OPTIMIZESHAPE

ANALYTICMODEL

OPTIMIZE SIZING

1

BiOPT METHODhttp://cife.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/TR202.pdf

DESIGN PROBLEM

2

3

4

FCD Sizing Algorithm http://cife.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/TR201_0.pdf

SEQOPT Algorithm (Booker, et al. 1999)

• Orders of magnitude reduction in design cycle time

• Evaluation of a greater number of design alternatives

• Improved product quality

Objective: Minimize steel weight

Constraints: Safety and serviceability

Possible design alternatives: ~ 102435

Variables: 1955 size and shape variables

Source: Stanford CIFE

Case Study: Overseas Housing DevelopmentFischer/Lepech/Flager/Basbagill and with Beck, Dallas, TX

SCOPE

(1)Housing buildings● substructure ● shell ●

interiors ● services

OBJECTIVES

(1)Minimize life-cycle cost(2)Minimize carbon footprint

VARIABLES

(1) Number of buildings: 3 - 4 (2) Number of stories: 5 - 8(3) Building footprint: H-shape(4) Building orientation: 0-360°

CONSTRAINTS

(1)Gross Floor Area (GFA): 1,500m2

(2)Distance to site perimeter: >20m

(3)Distance between building: >20m

DESIGN SPACE SIZE

Possible design configurations: 1.46E11

a bcd

e

f

Source: Stanford CIFE, Beck

7/6/2013

22

3 Configuration

Life-Cycle Performance

Capit al

Operat ional

Baseline

Number of buildings: 4

Number of floors : 8

Baseline

COST (USD, Millions) I M PACT (kt CO2e)

Base Design

($197M)(285kt)

IMPACT (Kt CO2e)

CO

ST (U

SD,

Millio

ns)

197

285


Configuration


Capital

Operational

Baseline Des ign 838



Baseline Des ign 838

140 136

5844

27 26

259 256


($18M) (4kt)

Reduced Cost Design

IMPACT (Kt CO2e)

CO

ST (U

SD,

Millio

ns)

197

285

-18

-4


3 Configuration


Capital

Operational

Baseline Des ign1898



Baseline Des ign1898

140 132

5849

27 26

259 251


($17M) (8kt)

Reduced Carbon Design

IMPACT (Kt CO2e)

CO

ST (U

SD,

Millio

ns)

197

285

-17

-8


Life-

Cycle

Cos

t (US

D, M

illion

s)

Carbon Footprint (met tons CO2e)

275k 280k 285k 290k 295k165

180

195

210

225

285k

Results: Life-Cycle Cost vs. Carbon Footprint

+

KEY

Baseline

Reduced Carbon

Reduced Cost

3 Buildings, 5 Stories









Comparing Performance of Conventional Design Process with MDO (Multi-disciplinary Optimization)

Conventional MDO Set-up time 60 hrs 140 hrs

Design cycle time 34 hrs 11 sec

Alternatives evaluated 3 21,360

Total design time 162 hrs 210 hrs

Life-cycle cost savings (USD) - $27 M

Carbon footprint reduction (CO2e)- 10 kt


2000 vs. 2013

AP, Apple.com

7/6/2013

23

BIMserver: Open Source Building Information Model Server

Source: bimserver.org

Open Source Building Information Model Server

Source: bimserver.org

www.archicentral.com

Norwegian Directorate of Public Construction and Property Norwegian Directorate of Public Construction and Property

Source: GSA+Statsbygg+Senaatti Joint Briefing, Washington DC, December 2010

CIFE, Stanford University © 2011 137

Understanding Disaster: How to rebuild and prepare for the futureKel ly Shultz, Chelsea Drenick, Calvin KamStanford University

CIFE, Stanford University © 2011 138

1. Digital Kiosk 2. Materials Database

3. Simplified City Planning Software

4. Community Re-build Plan with Schedule

Applying VDC

Addresses Disconnect #1

Addresses Disconnect #2

Emergency Response

7/6/2013

24


Source:

speedometer—not a racing game

no perfect economy

build upon evidence-based experiences



bimSCORE [[email protected]]Founder & CEO

