how can we develop critical thinkers? “everything flows.” (panta rei.) (brookfield, s.d. (1987)....

21
How Can We Develop Critical Thinkers? “Everything flows.” (Panta rei.) (Brookfield, S.D. (1987). Developing Critical Thinkers, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.)

Post on 19-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

How Can We Develop Critical Thinkers?

“Everything flows.” (Panta rei.)

(Brookfield, S.D. (1987). Developing Critical Thinkers, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.)

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 2

Model critical thinking: Clarity Consistency Openness Communicativeness Specificity Accessibility

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 3

Critical thinkers (1)

reject standardized formats for problem solving

consider a range of related and divergent fields

take multiple perspectives on a problem

view the world as relative and contextual rather than universal and absolute

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 4

Critical thinkers (2)

view the world as relative and contextual rather than universal and absolute

frequently use trial-and-error methods in their experimentation with alternative approaches

have a future orientation

have trust in their own judgment

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 5

Techniques for Imagining Alternatives

Brainstorming Envisioning Alternative Futures Developing Preferred Scenarios Futures Invention Esthetic Triggers

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 6

Brainstorming is an exercise in structured

spontaneity:

Actively thinking of as many varied, even outrageous, ideas as you can

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 7

Brainstorming rules

• the most outrages ideas may contain kernels of truths that can be extracted in the process of analysis

• as many ideas as possible (quantity => quality)

• build upon, integrate and develop upon ideas already voiced => analysis

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 8

Envisioning Alternative Futures:

Creating in one’s mind an image of the desired future organizational state that can serve as a guide to interim strategies, decisions and behaviors

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 9

Critical thinking comprises two interrelated processes

(1) Identifying and challenging assumptions (2) Imagining and exploring alternatives Note that, what frequently happens is that one

process occurs without the other: critical of the assumptions not stopping to suggest alternatives; or, inventing multiple alternatives without stopping to analyze critically the assumptions underlying these.

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 10

Critical thinking is a continuous process composed of alternating phases of reflecting on a problem or theme testing new solutions, strategies, or

methods on the basis of that reflection reflecting on the success of these actions in

particular contexts, and further honing, refining, and adapting these

actions according to alternative contexts

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 11

The central point: Thinking is an action

The action phases of critical thinking may be

– internal (mental) or

– external (behavioral)

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 12

More about Critical Thinking

• Processes of critical thinking are person-specific

• Emotions are central to critical thinking

• Intrinsic and extrinsic reasons for thinking critically are both important

• Critical insight often occurs unexpectedly

• Peer support is crucial to thinking critically

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 13

Facilitating Critical Thinking

There is no standard model of facilitating critical thinking

Diversity in methods and materials is necessary

Perfection is impossible Learner satisfaction is not the sole aim of

critical thinking Risk taking is important

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 14

Modeling Risk Taking

Risk taking is essential in the process of critical thinking; specific to the context

For example, ... the ability to make informed departures

from the script of a carefully planned lesson

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 15

Modeling Assumption Analysis

Critically analyzing assumptions is one of the most difficult of all capacities to model, since it entails a willingness to scrutinize one’s existing givens - an activity that can frequently be threatening and anxiety - producing

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 16

Atmosphere of Trust

Building an atmosphere of trust between teacher and students • the teacher models openness, honesty,

and integrity

• students sense that the teacher’s word can be relied upon; that she is not attempting to keep from them information about informal organizational norms or prejudices

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 17

Developing critical Thinking as Learning Conversation

• Good conversations are reciprocal and involving

• The course of good conversation cannot be anticipated

• Good conversations entail diversity and disagreement

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 18

Critical thinking is

a productive and positive activity

a process, not an outcome

triggered by positive as well as negative events

emotive as well as rational

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 19

Manifestations of critical thinking vary according to the context in which occurs

Example:

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 20

Components of critical thinking Identifying and challenging assumptions is

central to critical thinking Challenging the importance of context is

crucial to critical thinking Critical thinkers try to imagine and explore

alternatives Imagining and exploring alternatives leads to

reflective skepticism

July 2001 Mara Alagic: Critical Thinking 21

Learning Contract (750i) - Mode of Alternative Assessment

A title for the project A statement of purposes and objectives A description of resources (for example, experts, colleagues, books,

videos, computer software, internet) A summary of methods (for example, literature reviews, interviews,

questionnaires, observations) A specification of criteria for assessment A specification of indicators for judging whether or not these criteria

have been met A description of data collection techniques by which evaluative

evidence will be collected A self-evaluation