The Henderson Repository is a free resource of the HonorSociety of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International. It isdedicated to the dissemination of nursing research, research-related, and evidence-based nursing materials. Take credit for allyour work, not just books and journal articles. To learn more,visit www.nursingrepository.org

Item type Presentation

Title Hemolysis of Blood Specimens: Increasing Time in theEmergency Department

Authors Young, Sherry; Hiles, Julie

Downloaded 2-Jul-2018 23:14:01

Link to item http://hdl.handle.net/10755/162452

Hemolysis of Blood Specimens:

Increasing Throughput Time In The Emergency Department?

Julie Hiles, RN and Sherry Young, RN CEN, EMT-P

Purpose

Due to overcrowding in the Emergency Department, (ED) patient throughput flow is a hot topic. To enhance efficiency of patient flow, nurses often perform phlebotomy via a newly established intravenous (IV) site, to reduce the number of patient venipunctures when blood specimen and IV therapy is ordered. (Burns & Yoshikawa, 2002).

SOMC’s ED nurses noted an increased incidence of hemolysis of blood specimens after adopting the practice of nurses obtaining blood specimens via a newly established IV site.

Purpose

Hemolysis: the breakdown of red blood cells resulting in the release of hemoglobin; can be due to mechanical trauma (Mosby, 2002)

“Average Throughput Time” is an ED service indicator and Magnet indicator

Benchmark: 2.6 hoursSOMC ED: Average for Fiscal Year 2011 as of September was 2.9 hours

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in the proportion of hemolysis of blood specimens obtained from a newly inserted IV using a 20 g Advant IV safety catheter and blood specimens obtained from a 21g-23g straight needle venipuncture.

Setting

Study conducted in Level 2 ED of a 220-bed community teaching Appalachian hospital, located in Southern Ohio

ED has approximately 53,000 annual visits.

Design

Non-experimental Quantitative Descriptive Design

No manipulation of variablesReview of hemolysis logDescribe method of specimen collection/hemolysis

SubjectsConvenience sample of 100 hemolyzed blood samples drawn in the ED January, 2009-November 2009. (N = 101 were recorded)

ExclusionsAny ED patient under the age of 18Dialysis patientsMastectomy patients

Obtained approval from institutional IRB

Methods

Specimen CollectionRandomly selected ED nurses with 2 or more years of ED experience: IV site drawRandomly selected ED techs II with 2 or more years of ED experience: Venipunture

ED lab techs maintained record of all hemolyzed blood specimens drawn until N=100 (total of 101 were recorded).

MethodsBlood specimens were analyzed for hemolysis using a Hitachi automated spectrophotometer and visual inspection by the lab technologist.

Hemolyzed specimens were stratified according to method of specimen retrieval:

Group A = VeinipunctureGroup B = IV Site

Chi-Square, SPSS

Results

Of the 101 hemolyzed specimens, 65 (64.4%) were drawn by newly placed 20 g IV catheter, while 36 (35.6%) were drawn by 21 – 23 g venipuncture needle. There was a significant difference in the proportion of hemolysis in the two specimen collection methods χ2 (1, N = 101) = 8.327; p < .01

Implications

A decreased hemolysis rate would result in improved ED throughput, reduced length of stay for the patient, fewer recollections (saving in both time and materials), and better patient satisfaction. (Running a hospital: Fixing bad blood tests website November, 2008).Hemolysis can affect the patient’s length of stay in the ED setting due to delay in diagnosis and treatment while blood specimens are collected and analyzed again (Halm & Gleaves, 2009)

ImplicationsIV Nurses Society Standards do not support the practice of drawing blood specimens from peripheral IV lines (Nursing Research Council of United Hospital, 2004)

Policy developed for SOMC named Obtaining Blood for Lab Specimens

Lack of consistency in method of IV blood draw (site selection, discard/no discard spec, sequence of tube selection)

Implications

As this study was in process, systematic review of literature was published supporting venipunture as best practice for collecting blood samples, (Halm & Gleaves, 2009) supporting findings of this study and strengthening researchers’ recommendations

Recommend: SOMC ED develop an evidence based practice protocol regarding blood draws only to be obtained via venipuncture or arterial stick, not from newly started or established peripheral IV

Obtaining Blood for Lab Specimens Policy in the Emergency Department

Policy effective date was June 1, 2010

Staff members received education in shift briefings from Assistant Nurse Managers

All blood draws are to be done by venipuncture

Collaborative Effort

Southern Ohio Medical Center

Shawnee State University

Ohio University Centers For Osteopathic Research And Education (CORE)

ReferencesArzoumanian, L. (2003). What is hemolysis? BD Tech Talk, 2 (2).

Burns, E., & Yoshikawa, N. (2002). Hemolysis in serum samples drawn by emergency department personnel versus laboratory phlelbotomists. Lab Med, 33(5), 378-380.

Bush, V. (2003). The hemolyzed specimen: Causes, effects, and reduction.ED Lab Notes. 1, 2-5.

Cox, S., Dages, J., & Hazelett, S. (2004). Blood samples drawn from iv catheters have less hemolysis when 5-ml (vs. 10-ml) collection tubes are used. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 30(6), 529-33.

Dugan, L., Leech, L., Speroni, K., & Corriher, J. (2005). Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed iv sites in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 31(4), 338-45.

Grant, M. (2003). The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on the hemolysis of ed laboratory blood samples. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 29(2), 116-21.

ReferencesGruber, E. (2002). College of american pathologists reports (Hemolysis) (18). Retrieved

July 24, 2008 from www.cap.org.

Halm, M., & Gleaves, M. (2009). Obtaining blood samples from peripheral intravenous catheters: Best practice? American Journal of Critical Care, 18, 474-478.

Kennedy, C., Angermuller, S., King, R., Noviello, S., Walker, J., Warden, J. (1996). A comparision of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtainingblood samples. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 22(6), 566-9.

Lowe, G., Stike, R., Pollack, M., Bosley, J., O’Brien, P., Hake, A. (2008). Nursing bloodspecimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: Analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 34(1), 26-32.

Mosby’s Medical, Nursing, & Allied Health Dictionary. (2002). 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby.

Tanabe, P., Kyriacou, D., & Garland, F. (2003). Factors affecting the risk of blood bank specimen hemolysis. Academic Emergency Medicine, 10(8), 897-9.

(nd). Southern Ohio Medical Center. September 18, 2008, http://www.somc.org.

Questions?