heavy metal contamination in arable soils and vegetables around a sulfuric acid factory, china
TRANSCRIPT
Juan Liu*1,2
Jin Wang*1
Jianying Qi3
Xiangping Li1
Yongheng Chen1
Chunlin Wang4
Yingjuan Wu1
1Department of Environmental Science
and Engineering, Guangzhou
University, Guangzhou, China2Department of Earth Sciences,
National Taiwan University, Taipei,
China3South China Institute of
Environmental Science, Ministry of
Environmental Protection (SCIES-
MEP), Guangzhou, China4Research Center for Environmental
Science, Guangdong Provincial
Academy of Environmental Science,
Guangzhou, China
Research Article
Heavy Metal Contamination in Arable Soils andVegetables around a Sulfuric Acid Factory, China
This study was designed to investigate heavy metal (Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni) contami-
nation levels of arable soils and vegetables grown in the vicinity of a sulfuric acid
factory in the Western Guangdong Province, China. Health risks associated with these
metals by consumption of vegetables were assessed based on the hazard quotient (HQ).
The soils show a most significant contamination of Tl, followed by Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni.
The heavy metal contents (mg/g, dry weight basis) in the edible parts of vegetables range
from 5.60 to 105 for Tl, below detection limit to 227 for Pb, 5.0–30.0 for Cu, 10.0–82.9
for Zn, and 0.50–26.0 for Ni, mostly exceeding the proposed maximum permissible
level in Germany or China. For the studied vegetables, the subterranean part generally
bears higher contents of Tl and Zn than the aerial part, while the former has lower
contents of Cu and Ni than the latter. In addition, the results reveal that Tl is the major
risk contributor for the local people since its HQ values are mostly much higher than
1.0. The potential health risk of Tl pollution in the food chain and the issue of
food safety should be highly concerned and kept under continued surveillance and
control.
Keywords: Food; Hazard quotient; Health risk; Soil
Received: October 11, 2011; revised: November 22, 2011; accepted: December 5, 2011
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201100550
1 Introduction
The growing problem of heavy metal contamination has significant
negative effects on environmental quality and human livelihoods all
over the world [1–3]. During the recent decades, rapid urbanization
and industrialization releases large quantities of heavy metals into
the agro-environment, which substantially changes the soil quality
of arable soils. The accumulation of heavy metals in soils, either
essential micronutrient like Cu and Zn or toxic elements (e.g., Pb, Tl),
might exceed a toxic content level, thereby leading to ecological
damages through food chain [3, 4].
As a result of the persistent and non-biodegradable properties,
heavy metals could be accumulated in the vital organs of the human
body, causing numerous serious health disorders, such as decreased
immunological defenses, intrauterine growth retardation, impaired
psycho-social faculties, and disabilities associated with malnutrition
[5]. Previous investigations by Xiao et al. [6, 7] illustrated that in the
Lanmuchang area, Southwest China—a specific geo-environmental
context with Tl pollution, the continuous consumption of Tl-
containing vegetables grown in local Tl-contaminated soils resulted
in a chronic Tl poisoning (e.g., disturbance of vision, hair loss) of the
local villagers. The high prevalence of upper gastrointestinal cancer
rates in a region of the Eastern Turkey was found to be related to the
high metal (Co, Cd, Pb, Mn, Ni, and Cu) concentrations in fruits and
vegetables [8].
To date, an enormous number of sites in China have been con-
taminated by heavy metals, due to inadequate sewage treatment,
inadvertent spills, and some other related industrial activities [1, 3].
Inherent to this, reports on the incidental poisoning have soared
throughout China, mostly via intake of vegetables planted on the
heavy metal polluted soil [1, 7]. In the industrial site of the Yunfu
Sulfuric Acid Factory, which is located in the Western of Guangdong
Province, China, pertinent studies have shown that the open-air-
disposed slag material, surface water, sediment, and soil were
severely contaminated by heavy metals (such as Tl, Pb, and Cu)
[9–15]. Since its establishment in 1985, the factory has been dispos-
ing 10–15 thousand tons of pyrite slag in an open air annually [9].
Elevated contents of Tl (46.7 mg/g), Pb (1380 mg/g), and Cd (8.77 mg/g)
were found in the pyrite slag stockpile [10]. Relatively high pro-
portions (15–30%) of these metals were associated with the bio-
available fraction of the slag material [10]. Therefore, the possibilities
of heavy metal contamination of the arable soils and the vegetables
planted near the industrial area could not be ruled out. Worse still,
the discharged wastewater and solid wastes were irrationally and
randomly provided for irrigation and fertilization by the local
farmers. As observed in our field trip, various vegetables have been
successfully planted and consumed by the local inhabitants.
However, as to our knowledge, limited information is available
on the heavy metal contamination of the arable soils and vegetables
and the related health risks.
*Jin Wang and Juan Liu contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence: Professor Y. Chen, Department of EnvironmentalScience and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Waihuan Xi Road230, Panyu District, 510006 Guangzhou, ChinaE-mail: [email protected]
Abbreviations: ADD, average daily intake dose; BW, body weight; ED, theexposure duration; EF, the exposure frequency; EPA, EnvironmentalProtection Agency; HQ, hazard quotient; ICP-MS, inductively coupledplasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS); IR, intake rate; MPL, maximumpermissible level; MRI, Midwest Research Institute; RfD, oral referencedose; SCIES-MEP, South China Institute of Environmental Science,Ministry of Environmental Protection; TF, transfer factor
Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7 1
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com
The aims of this study are: (1) to quantify the content of heavy
metals (Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni) in the agricultural soil and vegetables
around the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory, China; (2) to assess potential
health risk to local populations produced by the metals via oral
exposure routes.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Location and sampling
Samplings were carried out in March 2009 around the industrial site
of the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory, located in the Western of
Guangdong Province, China (238030N and 1128010E). The factory
was established by the local government in 1985 as a state owned
enterprise, and plays a vital part in the local economy. The climate is
subtropical monsoon with a mean annual temperature of 228C and
precipitation around 1700 mm/year [11]. The annual average pH
value of rainwater, as reported, is around 4.0 [12].
Six kinds of vegetable samples cultivated in different croplands
around the factory were selected for this study, at the time of
sampling performed. The details of the vegetables are specified in
Tab. 1. They represented the major vegetable species growing in the
vicinity of the factory. The croplands are distributed within 0.2–
0.3 km distance from the factory, and the detailed location is given in
Fig. 1. At each sampling site of the vegetables, their corresponding
rhizosphere soil was collected manually, with a stainless steel shovel
to a depth of 10 cm. Accordingly, six soil samples were gained
in total. All samples were put in plastic bags immediately after
sampling and stored at �48C.
2.2 Sample preparation and analytical methods
Before laboratory analysis, plant samples were cleaned with distilled
water, separated into root, stem and leaf, and oven-dried at 608C to
constant weight. After this, the samples were cut into slices, ground,
and sieved at a size <80 mm, and sealed in polyethylene bottle for
later analysis. Soil samples were air-dried (at 228C) and sieved
(<80 mm in diameter).
The measurement of metal contents was accomplished at the
South China Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of
Environmental Protection (SCIES-MEP), Guangzhou, China. Prior
to measurement, 200 mg of each plant or soil sample were digested
with 4 mL of 68% HNO3 v/v, 1 mL of 40% hydrofluoric acid (HF) v/v, and
1 mL of 30% H2O2 v/v, at 1908C for 15 min in a WX-4000 closed-vessel
microwave digestion system (630� 50 W full power) (Shanghai EU
Chemical Instrument Co. Ltd, China). After the obtained solute was
cooled to the room temperature, 4 mL of saturated boric acid was
added into the solute. Subsequently, the solute was digested in the
same microwave system at 1908C for another 15 min, in order to
remove the excessive HF. The solution derived was then diluted into
100 mL for subsequent measurement of metals.
Heavy metal (Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni) determination was performed
on an Elan 6100 DRCII Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometer (ICP-MS, PerkinElmer Sciex, USA). The detailed
analytical conditions can be found in reference [11, 13]. The standard
solutions were prepared from ICP Multi-Element Standard Solutions
(SPEX Industries Inc., NJ, USA). In and Sc were used as internal
standards to compensate for changes in analytical signals that
may occur during the operation. Blank reagents were digested in
the same way as the samples. The detection limits of the analytical
method were evaluated by normalizing the result of seven repeated
analyses of experimental blank to a sample mass of 200 mg. The
average detection limits (3 s) of Tl, Pb, Cu, and Ni were 0.005 mg/g
and of Zn 0.015 mg/g. A Certified Reference Material (GBW07406)
obtained from the National Center for Standard Reference
Materials of China was digested along with the samples to assure
the precision and accuracy of analysis. The coefficients of variation of
triplicate analysis for the studied elements were below 10%, and the
accuracy was found to be within �5%.
Ultra-pure water (18.25 MV cm) from a MilliQ-system (Millipore,
Milford Corp., USA) was used for all the experiments. All glassware
and Teflon vessels were soaked in a 0.2 mol/L HNO3 solution for 24 h
and then rinsed with ultra-pure water. Nitric acid (HNO3), HF, and
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were of super-pure grade.
2.3 Calculation of transfer factor (TF)
In order to evaluate the transfer potential of a metal from soil to
plant, an index specified as transfer factor (TF) was applied in this
study. The TF refers to the ratio of the metal content in plant to that
in soil [16]. The TFs of Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni were calculated by the
equation below:
TF ¼ cplant
csoil
where cplant and csoil refer to the content of metal in plant and that in
soil, respectively.
2.4 Risk assessment
In this study, health risk assessment of Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni was
performed in the two stages: (1) exposure assessment; (2) risk assess-
ment. During the 1st stage, an average daily intake dose (ADD,
mg/(kg/d)) was applied to quantify the oral exposure dose of hazard-
ous substances. The ADD was calculated as follows [17]:
ADD ¼ ci � IR � ED� EF
BW � TA
where ci is the metal content in plant (mg/g, fresh weight); IR is the
intake rate (g/day, fresh weight); ED is the exposure duration (a); EF is
Table 1. General description of vegetable samples around the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory
Local name Botanical name Species Family
Soy bean Glycine max G. max FabaceaeTaro Colocasia esculenta C. esculenta AraceaeSweet potato Ipomoea batatas I. batatas ConvolvulaceaeChinese lettuce Lactuca sativa var. longifolia Lam. L. sativa AsteraceaeRomaine lettuce Lactuca sativa L. sativa AsteraceaeAubergine Solanum melongena L. S. melongena Solanaceae
2 J. Liu et al. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com
the exposure frequency (day/a); BW is the body weight (kg); and TA is
the average exposure time (day).
Based on preceding statistical estimated value [18, 19], a factor of
0.8 and 0.085 was used to convert the fresh to dry weight of the
soybean and the other leafy vegetables, respectively. The IR of the
studied vegetables was cited from a previous survey of consumption
habits of the suburb residents in the Guangdong Province [20].
According to the previous reports [21, 22], ED was assumed to be
30 a, and EF be 350 d/a. The BW used in this calculation was that of
the average Chinese adult (62.7 kg) [21], and the average exposure
time used was 70 a� 365 d/a.
In the 2nd stage, the hazard quotient (HQ) was used to assess the
health risk of non-carcinogenic adverse effect to the local residents,
arising from the exposure of toxicants through intake of vegetables.
In accordance with the standard US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) methods [22], the HQ is defined as the ratio of the
ADD and the oral reference dose (RfD, mg/(kg/day)), which could be
calculated as follows:
HQ ¼ ADD
Rf D
The US EPA has established the oral reference dose (RfD) for Pb, Cu,
Zn, and Ni in food at 3.5, 40, 300, and 20 mg/(kg/day), respectively [23].
Due to no RfD of Tl available at present, 0.08 mg/kg/day of provision
tolerable daily intake recommended by the US Midwest Research
Institute (MRI) [24] was used to elaborate Tl health hazard.
Guidelines for interpreting HQ calculations are listed in the
following [25]:
HQ< 0.1, no hazard exists;
HQ¼ 0.1–1.0, hazard is low;
HQ¼ 1.1–10, hazard is moderate;
HQ> 10, hazard is high.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Heavy metal content in the arable soils
The contents of Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni in the arable soils are listed in
Tab. 2. The Tl contents amount to 3.76–7.24 mg/g with the mean value
of 5.36 mg/g. The average Tl content in the background soil of China
and the Guangdong Province was found to be 0.58 and 0.52 mg/g,
respectively [26]. To date, no Tl limit has been established for the
agricultural soil in China, and the maximum admissible level of
1 mg/kg recommended by the Canadian guideline and Swiss
ordinance was used as the ‘‘critical trigger content’’ in the soil
[27]. Obviously, all the studied arable soils bear significantly elevated
level of Tl, exceeding the natural background level as well as the
critical trigger content.
The Pb contents in the soils vary from 43.2 to 94.2 mg/g with the
mean value of 65.9 mg/g (Tab. 2). According to previous survey [28],
the Pb contents of the normal Chinese soils are in the range of
9.95–56.0 mg/g, with the mean value of 26 mg/g, and that of the
background soil from the Guangdong Province is 36 mg/g [29]. By
considering the general range of the Pb content in the studied soils,
it appears that the soils are moderately contaminated by Pb.
However, the levels of Pb are still far below the maximum tolerable
Chinese agricultural content for soil (250 mg/g) [30].
The Cu contents in the arable soils range from 39.4 to 70.2 mg/g
with the mean value of 55.0 mg/g. In comparison to the mean content
of Cu in the background soil of China (17 mg/g) [28] and the
Guangdong Province (22.6 mg/g) [29], the arable soils around the
sulfuric acid factory are assumed to be contaminated by Cu to a
Figure 1. The location of the sampling sitearound the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory inGuangdong Province, China.
Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7 Heavy Metal Contamination in Arable Soils 3
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com
moderate degree. Still, Cu contents are mostly below or within the
limits of the corresponding maximum allowable content for soil in
China (50 mg/g) [30].
The amounts of Zn in the soils are in the range 47.2–88.5 mg/g with
the mean value of 71.5 mg/g (Tab. 2). Clearly, the Zn levels are
generally below or within the range of the Zn contents in the
background soil of China (47.3 mg/g) [28] and the Guangdong
Province (74.2 mg/g) [29]. Again, the Zn contents in the studies soils
are obviously below the threshold value of Zn (200 mg/g) in the
Chinese agricultural soil [30]. Therewith, the studied soils are not
contaminated by Zn. Similarly, no obvious Ni contamination is
observed.
Several possible reasons could be attributed to the high
enrichment of Tl in the studied soils: (1) the irrigation of the
arable soils by the Tl-containing wastewater discharged from the
sulfuric acid plant; (2) the fertilization of the soils by stockpiling
of the Tl-rich pyrite slag materials; and (3) the atmospheric
deposition of Tl-bearing aerosols on the soils. Our previous
investigation showed that Tl concentration in the wastewater of
the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory amounted to 15.4–400 mg/L,
since the conventional treatment method through precipitation
by limes, applied in the factory, is not capable of removing Tl from
the wastewater [14]. According to [15], the aerosols from the factory
were found to contain high contents of Tl (18.6–33.1 mg/g).
3.2 Heavy metal content in the edible parts of
vegetables
As listed in Tab. 3, heavy metal contents (mg/g, dry weight basis) in
the edible parts of vegetables range from 5.60 to 105 for Tl, below
detection limit to 227 for Pb, 5.0–30.0 for Cu, 10.0–82.9 for Zn, and
0.50–26.0 for Ni. According to the maximum permissible levels
(MPLs) of contaminants in foods of China (GB2762-2005) [31], the
average Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni levels in the edible parts are 151, 1.64,
1.35, and 6.82 times higher than the permissible values, respectively.
Since no guideline of Tl in foods is available in China, the MPL
(0.5 mg/g) in foods and feedstuffs recommended in Germany
(Richtlinie 2310 Blatt 29 (E)) was utilized in this case [32, 33]. As
shown in Tab. 3, the Tl levels in all the vegetable samples
highly exceed the MPL for Tl, with the highest (105 mg/g) in the
edible parts of sweet potato followed by the aubergine fruit
(38.4 mg/g). On average, the Tl content in the edible part of the
vegetables is 69.2 times as high as the permissible values. High
Table 3. Heavy metal contents in the edible parts of the vegetables around the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory
Tl (mg/g) Pb (mg/g) Cu (mg/g) Zn (mg/g) Ni (mg/g)
Soybean 22.6 227 30.0 82.9 4.00Taro 5.60 ND 20.0 10.0 4.50Sweet potato 105 43.4 18.5 13.5 3.50Chinese lettuce 14.2 1.50 8.00 12.0 26.0Aubergine 38.4 ND 17.0 18.5 2.50Romaine lettuce 22.0 ND 5.00 25.5 0.50Minimum 5.60 ND 5.00 10.0 0.50Maximum 105 227 30.0 82.9 26.0Mean 34.6 45.3 16.4 27.0 6.80Maximum permissible levela) 0.5 0.3 10 20 1
ND, not detectable.a) The value for Tl is taken from [32, 33]; the others are referred to [31].
Table 2. Heavy metal content (mg/g), pH, and cation exchange capacity (CEC, cmol (þ)/kg) in the arable soils around the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory
Tl Pb Cu Zn Ni pHd) CECe)
Soy bean soil 3.76 43.2 39.4 47.2 22.6 6.72 10.8Taro soil 5.03 52.6 54.6 59.4 26.5 5.91 6.15Sweet potato soil 6.56 85.1 52.9 82.2 34.0 5.56 7.95Chinese lettuce soil 5.32 51.9 70.2 77.0 29.4 5.20 9.66Romaine lettuce soil 7.24 94.2 63.1 88.5 28.4 4.42 5.76Aubergine soil 4.27 68.4 49.8 74.7 24.1 5.63 8.79Minimum 3.76 43.2 39.4 47.2 22.6 4.42 5.76Maximum 7.24 94.20 70.20 88.50 34.00 6.72 10.8Mean 5.36 65.90 55.00 71.50 27.50 5.57 8.18Background soil in Chinaa) 0.58 26 22.6 74.2 26.9 NG NGBackground soil in Guangdong Provinceb) 0.52 36 17 47.3 14.4 NG NGMaximum permissible level in soilc) 1.00 250 50 200 40 NG NG
NG, not given.a) The value of Tl content is taken from [26]; the others are referred to [28].b) The value of Tl content is taken from [26]; the others are referred to [29].c) The value of Tl content is taken from [27]; the others are referred to [30].d) Determined in 1:1 w/v soil/ultra-pure water suspension after equilibration for 15 min [9, 11].e) Determined by using BaCl2–H2SO4 exchange method [9, 11].
4 J. Liu et al. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com
contents of Tl were also detected in the French rape (53 mg/kg), the
mustard (147.6 mg/kg) in Poland, the cereal grains (9.5 mg/kg), and
the green cabbage (45 mg/kg) in Germany, and the green cabbage
(120–495 mg/kg) in China [7].
3.3 Heavy metal contents in tissues of vegetables
The heavy metal contents in tissues of the vegetables, such as root,
leave, stalk, and fruit, are presented in Fig. 2. For most of the studied
vegetables, the Tl contents in the subterranean part (root and/or
stalk) are higher than those in the aerial part. The Tl contents in
soybean decrease in the order of root, stalk, leave, and fruit.
Aubergine has higher Tl content in the root than in the other parts.
In the leaf lettuce, the root has much higher Tl content than the
leave. In the taro, the significant enrichment of Tl is found in the root
as well as in the subterranean fruit. A possible reason is that the
likely source of Tl accumulation in the plants is the abnormally high
Tl content retained in the soils and/or surface waters other than
dusts, and root and/or fruit is the part of the plants that is in direct
touch with the soils and/or surface waters. Previous studies have
demonstrated as well that the enrichment of Tl in soil and water may
result in Tl transfer to food crops [7, 33, 34].
Similar to the distribution of Tl, higher levels of Zn were observed
in the subterranean parts than the aerial parts of taro, aubergine
and leaf lettuce. However, Cu and Ni contents in the aerial part
are obviously higher than those in the parts underground. It might
be due to the adsorption of aerosols containing Cu or Ni through the
leaves.
As shown in Tab. 4, the TF values for Tl vary from 2.77 to 27.1. The
mean TF value for Tl is 12.6, which is more than 25 folds higher than
Cu and Ni, 15 times above Zn, and nine times above Pb. This indicates
that Tl is much more inclined to transfer from soil to vegetable. The
high Tl enrichment in the plants could be explained by the non-
discriminatory uptake of Tlþ over Kþ in the organisms of the plants,
due to the similarity of the ionic radii of Tlþ (1.49 A) and Kþ (1.33 A) [7].
The values of Cu and Ni are generally <1.0, which are obviously
lower than other metals (Tab. 4). This indicates that their amount
adsorbed by vegetables from soil via root is quite limited. It may
be explained by that it is more difficult for vegetable to uptake
Cu and Ni from soil, in that soil organic matter can react with
Cu and Ni to form stable complex [17, 35]. Meanwhile, for
most of the studied vegetables, the leaves have notable higher
contents of Cu and Ni than the roots. This might be ascribed to
the contribution of Cu and Ni to the leaves from the atmospheric
dust particles.
3.4 Assessment of health risks from the heavy
metal in the vegetables
3.4.1 Average daily intake dose (ADD)
For the inhabitants around the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory, the daily
ingestion rate of soybean, taro, sweet potato, Chinese lettuce,
aubergine, and romaine lettuce is 7.0, 26.4, 26.4, 106, 106, and
106 g/person per day, respectively [20]. Accordingly, the total ADD
of Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni is 3.93, 2.92, 2.06, 3.42, and 1.73 mg/(kg/day),
respectively (see Tab. 4).
3.4.2 Hazard quotient (HQ)
Oral reference dose was based on 0.08, 3.5, 40, 300, and 20 mg/(kg/day)
for Tl, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni, respectively [23, 24]. As shown in Tab. 4,
the HQ of heavy metals in the vegetables decreases in the order of
sweet potato> romaine lettuce> aubergine>Chinese lettuce>
taro> soybean (for Tl), sweet potato> soybean>Chinese lettuce>
romaine lettuce� aubergine� taro (for Pb), aubergine>Chinese
lettuce> romaine lettuce> soybean> sweet potato> taro (for Cu),
Figure 2. Heavy metal distribution in the tissues of the vegetables ( soy bean, & taro, & sweet potato, romaine lettuce, Chinese lettuce,aubergine).
Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7 Heavy Metal Contamination in Arable Soils 5
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com
romaine lettuce>Chinese lettuce� soybean> taro� sweet potato
> aubergine (for Zn), and Chinese lettuce> aubergine� sweet
potato> soybean> romaine lettuce> taro (for Ni).
The HQ of Tl in sweet potato as well as romaine lettuce amounts
to more than 15, indicating a high potential hazard to the
inhabitants by consuming these kinds of vegetable. The HQ in
Chinese lettuce and aubergine are both around 6, suggesting a
moderate hazard. Besides, a potential low hazard is not negligible
for the inhabitants via intake of Taro and soy bean, for their HQ
of Tl are in the range of 0.1–1.0. However, the HQ of Pb, Cu, Zn, and
Ni in all the vegetables are much lower than 1, indicating that
no immediate hazard is available to the residents by single intake
of Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni.
In addition, the total HQ from consuming the studied vegetables
planted near the Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory lessens in the sequence
of Tl> Pb>Ni>Cu>Zn (Tab. 4). The respective total HQ of Cu, Zn
and Ni is much lower than 0.1, illustrating no hazard arising from
these elements would be exposed to the local residents by consump-
tion of the vegetables. As displayed in Tab. 4, the total HQ of Pb is less
than 1.0, which suggests that a low risk may result from intake of Pb.
But extremely high total HQ of Tl (49.1) in the vegetables indicates
remarkable potential health hazards by intake of Tl. On the
one hand, the toxic effects of Tl on humans, are linked partly to
the readiness whereby Tlþ substitutes for Kþ as an activator of some
reactions catalyzed by enzymes; on the other hand, Tlþ has an
especial affinity for SH-groups and can cause disordered of metabolic
or energy processes in cells of human bodies [33].
4 Summary
The investigation of the arable soils and vegetables grown nearby the
Yunfu Sulfuric Acid Factory in the Western Guangdong Province,
China shows that (1) the soils are significantly contaminated by Tl
with a moderate contamination of Pb and Cu and no contamination
of Zn and Ni; (2) the contents of Tl, Cu, and Ni in the edible parts
of the vegetables though generally exceed the proposed MPL, but
only extremely high potential risks arising from Tl are detected
to the local residents by intake of the vegetables, with total HQ
amounting to around 50. Therefore, the status of heavy metal
contents of the food crops grown in the vicinity of the sulfuric
acid factory and their implications for human health should be
further investigated. Besides, it is high time to take appropriate
measures to control and prevent Tl contamination in the area.
Acknowledgments
This project was performed under the support of the National
Natural Science Foundation Committee of P.R. China (no.
40930743; no. 41173100), the Guangzhou Bureau of Education
(no. 10A029), and the Start-up Scientific Research Project of the
Guangzhou University (WJ05-2001).
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
[1] L. M. Wu, S. Rutherford, C. Chu, The Need for Health ImpactAssessment in China: Potential Benefits for Public Health andSteps Forward, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2011, 31 (4), 420.
[2] F. Cevik, F. Cevik, M. Z. L. Goksu, O. B. Derici, O. Fındık, AnAssessment of Metal Pollution in Surface Sediments of SeyhanDam by Using Enrichment Factor, Geoaccumulation Index andStatistical Analyses, Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 152 (1–4), 309.
[3] A. Singh, R. K. Sharma, M. Agrawal, F. M. Marshall, Health RiskAssessment of Heavy Metals via Dietary Intake of Foodstuffs fromthe Wastewater Irrigated Site of a Dry Tropical Area of India, FoodChem. Toxicol. 2010, 48 (2), 611.
[4] P. Babula, V. Adam, R. Opatrilova, J. Zehnalek, L. Havel, R. Kizek,Uncommon Heavy Metals, Metalloids and Their Plant Toxicity: AReview, Environ. Chem. Lett. 2008, 6 (4), 189.
[5] G. V. Iyengar, P. P. Nair, Global Outlook on Nutrition and theEnvironment: Meeting the Challenges of the Next Millennium,Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 249 (1–3), 331.
[6] T. F. Xiao, C. Q. Liu, L. B. He, B. Zheng, J. Guha, G. Wilson, Z. Ning,Potential Health Risk in Areas of High Natural Concentrations ofThallium and Importance of Urine Screening, Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22(5), 919.
Table 4. Transfer factor (TF), average daily intake dose (ADD), total ADD, hazardous quotient (HQ), and total HQ of the vegetables around the Yunfu
Sulfuric Acid Factory
Tl Pb Cu Zn Ni
TF Soybean 13.5 6.62 0.89 2.64 0.29Taro 2.77 0.00 0.68 0.62 0.34Sweet potato 27.1 1.07 0.60 0.27 0.16Chinese lettuce 4.0 0.27 0.22 0.30 1.17Aubergine 13.5 0.00 0.42 0.43 0.77Romaine lettuce 15.0 0.54 0.13 0.52 0.04
ADD (mg/(kg/day)) Soybean 0.04 2.02 0.37 0.64 0.04Taro 0.06 0.00 0.12 0.22 0.02Sweet potato 1.54 0.64 0.27 0.20 0.05Chinese lettuce 0.48 0.27 0.47 0.71 1.54Aubergine 0.51 0.00 0.53 0.15 0.06Romaine lettuce 1.30 0.00 0.30 1.50 0.03
Total ADD (mg/(kg/day)) 3.93 2.92 2.06 3.42 1.73HQ Soybean 0.53 0.576 0.009 0.002 0.000
Taro 0.75 0.000 0.003 0.001 0.001Sweet potato 19.3 0.183 0.007 0.001 0.003Chinese lettuce 5.95 0.076 0.012 0.002 0.077Aubergine 6.34 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.003Romaine lettuce 16.3 0.000 0.007 0.005 0.001
Total HQ 49.1 0.835 0.052 0.011 0.085
6 J. Liu et al. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com
[7] T. F. Xiao, F. Yang, S. Lia, B. Zheng, Z. Ning, Thallium Pollution inChina: A Geo-environmental Perspective, Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 421–422, 51.
[8] M. K. Turkdogan, F. Kilicel, K. Kara, I. Tuncer, I. Uygan, Heavy Metalsin Soil, Vegetables and Fruits in the Endemic Upper GastrointestinalCancer Region of Turkey, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 13 (3), 175.
[9] C. X. Yang, Y. H. Chen, P. Peng, C. Li, et al., Distribution of Naturaland Anthropogenic Thallium in the Soils in an Industrial Pyrite SlagDisposing Area, Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 341 (1–3), 159.
[10] C. L. Wang, P. Zhang, Y. H. Chen, J. Y. Qi, J. Liu, The Determination ofCd, Tl, Pb Speciation in Pyrite Ores and Cinders, Environ. Chem.(in Chinese) 2008, 27 (3), 386.
[11] J. Liu, J. Wang, Y. H. Chen, J. Y. Qi, et al., Thallium Distribution inSediments from the Pearl River Basin, China, Clean – Soil Air Water2010, 38 (10), 909.
[12] Y. J. Wu, Y. H. Chen, R. Liu, Z. Zou, et al., Thallium in Slag of SulfuricAcid Leached under Acid Rain, Environ. Chem. (in Chinese) 2000, 19 (4), 47.
[13] X. Li, J. Y. Qi, C. L. Wang, J. Liu, et al., Environmental Quality of SoilPolluted by Thallium and Lead in Pyrite Deposit Area of WesternGuangdong Province, J. Agron. Environ. Sci. (in Chinese) 2009, 28 (3), 496.
[14] Y. H. Chen, W. B. Xie, Y. J. Wu, Z. H. Wang, Utilization of MineralResources Containing Thallium and Thallium Pollution in China, J.Shenzhen Univ. (Sci. Eng.) (in Chinese) 2001, 18 (1), 57.
[15] C. L. Wang, PhD Thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy ofSciences, Beijing 2010.
[16] H. B. Cao, J. Chen, J. Zhang, H. Zhang, et al., Heavy Metals in Rice andGarden Vegetables and Their Potential Health Risks to Inhabitantsin the Vicinity of an Industrial Zone in Jiangsu, China, J. Environ. Sci.2010, 22 (11), 1792.
[17] N. Zheng, Q. Wang, D. Zheng, Health Risk of Hg, Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu tothe Inhabitants around Huludao Zinc Plant in China viaConsumption of Vegetables, Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 383 (1–3), 81.
[18] X. Y. Xiao, T. B. Chen, X. Y. Liao, X. L. Yan, et al., Comparison ofConcentrations and Bioconcentration Factors of Arsenic inVegetables, Grain and Oil Crops in China, Acta Sci. Circumstantiae(in Chinese) 2009, 29 (2), 291.
[19] S. P. Datta, S. D. Young, Predicting Metal Uptake and Risk to theHuman Food Chain from Leaf Vegetables Grown on Soils Amendedby Long-term Application of Sewage Sludge, Water Air Soil Pollut.2005, 163 (1–4), 119.
[20] W. J. Ma, F. Deng, Y. J. Xu, The Study on Dietary Intakeand Nutritional Status of Residents in Guangdong, South China,J. Prev. Med. (in Chinese) 2005, 31 (1), 1.
[21] MHPRC (Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China),National Nutrition and Health Status of Chinese Residents (in Chinese),MHPRC, Beijing 2004.
[22] US EPA, Exposure Factors Handbook-EPA/600/P-95/002Fa, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC 1997.
[23] US EPA, Risk-based Concentration Table, United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC 2000.
[24] Dynamic Corporation, Rockville, MD, for the Office of SolidWaste, Toxicity of Thallium (I) Sulfate (CAS No. 7446-18-6) inSprague-Dawley Rats, Midwest Research Institute, Washington, DC1988.
[25] US EPA, Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC 1992.
[26] W. Qi, Y. Chen, J. Cao, Indium and Thallium Background Contents inSoils in China, Int. J. Environ. Study 1992, 40 (4), 311.
[27] A. L. J. Peter, T. Viraraghavan, Thallium: A Review of Public Healthand Environmental Concerns, Environ. Int. 2005, 31 (4), 493.
[28] Y. Wang, F. S. Wei, G. Z. Yang, C. J. Zheng, et al., Elemental Chemistry ofSoil Environment (in Chinese), The Chinese Environmental SciencePublisher, Beijing 1995.
[29] CEMS (The Chinese Environmental Monitoring Station), TheBackground Value of Element in the Chinese Soil (in Chinese), TheChinese Environmental Science Publisher, Beijing 1990.
[30] NEPAC (National Environmental Protection Agency of China),Environmental Quality Standards for Soils (GB 15618-1995) (in Chinese),The Chinese Standard Press, Beijing 1995.
[31] MHPRC (Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China),Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods (GB2762-2005) (in Chinese),MHPRC, Beijing 2005.
[32] Fachbereich Umweltqualitat (Department of EnvironmentalQuality, Germany), Maximum Emission Values – Maximum ThalliumEmission Values for Livestock (Richtlinie 2310 Blatt 29 (E)), KommissionReinhaltung der Luft im VDI und DIN – Normenausschuss KRdL,Dusseldorf 1998.
[33] C. LaCoste, B. Robinson, R. Brooks, Uptake of Thallium byVegetables: Its Significance for Human Health, Phytoremediationand Phytomining, J. Plant Nutr. 2001, 24 (8), 1205.
[34] A. Vanek, V. Chrastny, M. Mihaljevic, P. Drahota, T. Grygar, M.Komarek, Lithogenic Thallium Behavior in Soils with DifferentLand Use. J. Geochem. Explor. 2009, 102 (1), 7.
[35] T. Chirenje, C. Rivero, L. Q. Ma, Leachability of Cu and Ni in WoodAsh-amended Soil as Impacted by Humic and Fulvic Acid, Geoderma2002, 108 (1–3), 31.
Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2012, 00 (0), 1–7 Heavy Metal Contamination in Arable Soils 7
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.clean-journal.com