green mondays 11-14-11

34
Sponsored by

Upload: blueridgesustainability

Post on 16-Apr-2017

310 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Sponsored by

Page 2: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Panelists:Jeanine DavisKeith CollinsTony McGaha

A New Look at Sustainable Food Systems

November 14, 2011

Moderator:Jack Britt

Page 3: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Sustainable food systems…to feed the billions.

• Intensification of agriculture

• Examples of improved sustainability in US food systems

• Examples of three different food systems

• Tomatoes and tomato products

• Milk and dairy products

• Beef and beef products

Page 4: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

“…the net effect of higher yields has avoided emissions of 590 Gt CO2e since 1961.”

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation by Agricultural IntensificationJennifer A. Burney, Steven J. Davis and David B. Lobella

Stanford University, Stanford, CA and Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, CA

Source: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0914216107 published 2010

Intense agriculture reduced carbon footprint for feeding the world

GreaterThanLand Mass

Of Russia

Page 5: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

So how are we doing in the U.S. ?

Page 6: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Farms and farmland in the United States, 2007

Source: 2007 Census of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service, USDA.http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/usv1.pdf

Ownership Type No. Farms % of Farms Acres % of Acres

Family or individual 1,906,335 86% 574,150,050 62%

Partnership 174,247 8% 161,416,999 18%

Corporation* 96,074 4% 125,319,200 14%

Other** 28,136 1% 61,208,981 7%

2,204,792 100% 922,095,230 100%*91% are family corporations **cooperative, estate, trust, institutional, etc.

Buncombe County has enough farmland to support a population of 31,600,based on U.S. average of 3 acres of farmland per person.

Page 7: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Changes in land use in the United States 1982-2007U.S. Population Grew 30% During this Period

Source: Dale et al. Ecological Applications 24: 1039-1054, 2011.

-19%

+55%

-2% No change

+17%

+140%

-8%

CultivatedCropland

Rangeland Forest Land Non-cultivatedCropland

CRP Land PastureLand

Developed Land

Page 8: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Examples of US Agriculture Rank Rank in World

Arable and permanent cropland 1Corn production, soybean production 1Milk yield per cow 1Tractors 1Meat production 2Fresh citrus 2Organic cropland 4Fertilizer use per hectare of cropland 40Pesticide use per hectare of cropland 43

How is the U.S. doing in production and sustainability?

Source: United Nations FAO most recent reports.

Page 9: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

US excels in sustainability measures: GHG production by dairy systems across regions of the world

Source: FAO 2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector - A Life Cycle Assessment

N A

mer

ica

C &

S A

mer

ica

W

Eur

ope

E E

urop

e

Rus

sian

Fed

N A

fric

a &

W A

sia

Sub

sar A

fric

a

Sou

th A

sia

Eas

t Asi

a

Oce

ania

Wor

ld

Page 10: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Item 1944 2007 Change, %

U.S. milk production, billion kg

53 84 +58%

Resources per billion kg of milkCows, thousands 415 94 -77%Feed, billion kg 8.3 1.9 -77%Manure, billion kg 7.9 1.9 -76%Carbon footprint, billion kg CO2

3.7 1.4 -62%

Improvements in on-farm measures of sustainability by the US dairy farms from 1944 to 2007

Source: Capper, J. L., R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman. 2009. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science doi:10.2527/jas.2009-1781

Page 11: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Processing

DirectSales

Processing

ProcessingDistribution

Center

Distribution Center

Sustainability of Food System

Consumer

Farm

Farm

Farm

Farm

Farm

?

?

?

Page 12: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Tomato Production and Products

Dr. Jeanine Davis

Associate Professor & Extension Specialist

Page 13: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Cali

fornia

Florid

a

Indian

a O

hio

Michiga

n

Georgia

Virg

inia

New Je

rsey

Tennesse

e

North

Carolin

a

Pennsyl

vania

South

Carolin

a

New York

Minneso

ta

Texa

s

Alab

ama

Arka

nsas

Kentu

cky

Illin

ois

Mary

land

Haw

aii

Connecti

cut

Mass

achuse

tts

Miss

ouri

Miss

issippi

Wisc

onsin

Ore

gon

Colorado

Wash

ington

Oklah

oma

Louisi

ana

New M

exico

West

Virginia

Iowa

Main

e U

tah

New Ham

pshire

Kan

sas

Rhode Isl

and

Delaw

are

Nebras

ka

Verm

ont

Ariz

ona

Montan

a

Idah

o

South

Dakota

Neva

da

North

Dakota

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

Tomatoes, acres, 2007

85% of U.S. tomatoes are produced in two states

Page 14: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Americans eat about 20 pounds of tomatoes per person, per year. Three-quarters of that is in processed form,

e.g., ketchup, salsa, and sauce.

Page 15: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Where do all these tomatoes come from?• The U.S. produces about 2 million

tons of fresh market tomatoes and 12 million tons of processing tomatoes each year.

• We also import almost $900 million worth of tomatoes annually, mostly from Canada, Mexico, and the Netherlands.

• Florida and California and the major tomato producing states; comprising over 2/3 of all the tomatoes grown in the U.S.

• California produces 95% of the processing tomatoes.

Page 16: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Could we produce all the tomatoes we need within our own county?

• In Buncombe county, we would need to devote about 25% of our existing vegetable acreage to tomatoes.

• In Mecklenburg County, however, 6X the existing vegetable acreage in the county would be needed to provide for their population.

• To provide for all 9.5 million people in the state, we would only need 4,768 acres of tomatoes.

Page 17: Green Mondays 11-14-11

We could produce all the tomatoes we currently consume, but…

• For fresh-market tomatoes, it would cost us more, especially in the off-season, and we’d have to convince more farmers to grow them, but we could do it.

• For us to produce all the processed tomato products we consume would be much more difficult and costly;

• we would need to develop new varieties and production methods, build processing plants, etc.

Page 18: Green Mondays 11-14-11

So what does it cost for us, environmentally and socially, to

maintain the status quo, i.e., have just two states provide a ready supply of

cheap tomatoes?• Let’s focus on California processing tomato

production since that really is the giant in the industry.

Photo from GrowingProduce.com

Page 19: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Value-Chains for California tomatoes

Note how much of the path is oriented towards marketers and processors.

Graph from ‘A Value Chain Analysis of Selected California Crops’ by M. Lowe and G. Gereffi, Duke University, 2008

Page 20: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Water UseTomatoes are always irrigated and are mostly water, so expected this to be much higher!

Graph from ‘A Value Chain Analysis of Selected California Crops’ by M. Lowe and G. Gereffi, Duke University, 2008

Page 21: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Nitrogen fertilizer useFertilizer use is very high! Run-off, groundwater contamination, and fossil fuel consumption during manufacturing are big concerns.This could be reduced with conservation tillage, drip-irrigation, and new varieties.

Graph from ‘A Value Chain Analysis of Selected California Crops’ by M. Lowe and G. Gereffi, Duke University, 2008

Page 22: Green Mondays 11-14-11

What about ‘food miles’ and greenhouse gas emissions?

• Many studies have demonstrated that agricultural production accounts for the bulk of the food system's greenhouse gas emissions; 80% or more of emissions occur before the product even leaves the farm.

• In most cases, transportation plays a relatively minor role.

Photo from Western Farm Press

Page 23: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Overall environmental impacts• In 1998 the Swedish Institute for Food and

Biotechnology published a lifecycle analysis on tomato ketchup.

• “The results showed that it was the hidden (and thus largely ignored by consumers) aspects of the product – its processing as well as its primary and secondary packaging along the supply chain – that had the most devastating consequences for climate and the environment.”

Quote from Pat Thomas, Behind the Label: Tomato Ketchup, The Ecologist, 2010

Page 24: Green Mondays 11-14-11

What about social issues, such as how much are field workers paid?

Workers on large farms are usually paid less and there are many issues about the number of hours worked, pesticide exposure, and working and living conditions.

66.16.26.36.46.56.6

U.S. Dollars

per Hour

Tomato Farming Labor Wages (U.S. Dollars)

IndustrialFarmsLocal Farms

Graph from The Underlying Costs of Tomatoes, a report by Amanda Collins, Edgewood College, 2005

Page 25: Green Mondays 11-14-11

What is a sustainable tomato production system?

• There is no simple answer.• It’s not just “local” versus “industrialized”.• Lots of issues to consider and they are all

interconnected.• We’ve done a good job of raising awareness.• New studies will help us define what direction we

need to go.

Page 26: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Milk and Dairy Products

Mr. Keith Collins

President, Milkco Inc.

Page 27: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Calif

ornia:

New York:

Idah

o:

New M

exico:

Texas

:

Ohio:

Ariz

ona:

Verm

ont:

Florid

a:

Colorad

o:

Miss

ouri:

Utah

:

Georgi

a:

Okla

homa:

Tennesse

e:

North

Carolin

a:

North

Dakota:

Louisia

na:

Miss

issippi:

Arka

nsas:

Mass

achusetts:

Alab

ama:

West

Virginia:

Haw

aii:

Rhode Isl

and:

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Milk, Million Pounds

52% of U.S. milk is produced in 5

states

Page 28: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

1950

1952

1954

1956

1958

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

0

50

100

150

200

Million LbsMilk Bottling Plants

Num

ber o

f Milk

Bott

ling

Plan

ts

Mill

ion

Poun

ds P

roce

ssed

Per

Pla

nt

Page 29: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Milk and Dairy Products

Mr. Keith Collins

President, Milkco Inc.

Page 30: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Beef Production and Products

Mr. Tony McGaha

Extension Agent, Agriculture, Haywood County

Page 31: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Texa

sO

klah

oma

Mis

sour

iN

ebra

ska

Sout

h D

akot

aKa

nsas

Mon

tana

Kent

ucky

Tenn

esse

eA

rkan

sas

Flor

ida

Nor

th D

akot

aIo

wa

Colo

rado

Wyo

min

gV

irgi

nia

Ala

bam

aCa

lifor

nia

Ore

gon

Geo

rgia

Mis

siss

ippi

New

Mex

ico

Loui

sian

aId

aho

Min

neso

taIll

inoi

sN

orth

Car

olin

aU

tah

Ohi

oW

isco

nsin

Nev

ada

Was

hing

ton

Indi

ana

Wes

t Vir

gini

aSo

uth

Caro

lina

Ari

zona

Penn

sylv

ania

Mic

higa

nN

ew Y

ork

Haw

aii

Mar

ylan

dM

aine

Ver

mon

tN

ew Je

rsey

Mas

sach

usett

sA

lask

aCo

nnec

ticut

Del

awar

eN

ew H

amps

hire

Rhod

e Is

land

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Beef cows 1000 hd

53% of beef cows are in

8 states

Page 32: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Texa

s

Neb

rask

a

Kans

as

Iow

a

Colo

rado

Calif

orni

a

Sout

h Da

kota

Okl

ahom

a

Min

neso

ta

Arizo

na

Idah

o

Wisc

onsin

Was

hing

ton

Mich

igan

Ohi

o

Illin

ois

Indi

ana

Ore

gon

Penn

sylv

ania

Wyo

min

g

Nor

th D

akot

a

Miss

ouri

Mon

tana

New

Yor

k

Utah

Virg

inia

Kent

ucky

Mar

ylan

d

Tenn

esse

e

Nev

ada

Arka

nsas

Wes

t Virg

inia

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000 56% of cattle on feed are in 3 states

Cattle on feed, 1000 hd

Page 33: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

Supermarket

FurtherProcessing

DirectSales

ValueAdded

PackerDistribution

Center

Distribution Center

Beef System from Farm to Consumer

Consumer

BackgroundStocker

Farm

Farm

Farm

Farm

Farm

Cow-Calf

Feed

lot

Farm

Farm

Farm

CAFO

CAFO

Page 34: Green Mondays 11-14-11

Blue

Rid

ge

11/14/2011

Sustainability Institute

Questions & Discussion