governance past present future
TRANSCRIPT
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Plan Design Considerations: Governance Past, Present, and Future
December-2011Compensation Venture Group, Inc.
206.780.5547www.compensationventuregroup.comfred@compensationventuregroup.com
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Discussion Outline
Back Then: Where We Started
Past: Roots of Current Design
Present: Where We Are
Future: What’s Next
Other Issues: Threats to Equity
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Where We Started
Congress encouraged equity compensation Incentive stock options (422) ESPP (423) ESOP (ERISA) Reg T – cashless exercise
Stock options by far the most prevalent
All-employee equity in technology sector
Restricted stock only in large, mature companies
Performance shares introduced in large, mature companies during flat market (1968-1982)
No expense for options, no Black-Scholes calculations
…and there was cake, and there was negus, and there was a great piece of Cold Roast, and there was a great piece of Cold Boiled, and there were mince-pies, and plenty of beer
3
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Past: Roots of Current Design
Tax code as punishment for “excess” executive pay
280G - golden parachutes (1984) 162(m) - million dollar cap (1993) 409A – deferred compensation (2004)
Accounting rules as punishment for executive pay
FAS123 FIN 44 FAS123R ASC 718 IFRS2
Regulatory
4
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Past: Roots of Current Design
Other legislation chipped in
Sarbanes-Oxley: cashless exercise, clawbacks 8-K filing requirements
Disclosure rules became another lever to “embarrass” over executive pay – disclosure requirements increased in:
Compensation Committee Report CD&A Total Compensation in Summary Compensation
Table Tables, tables, and more tables
Regulatory
5
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Past: Roots of Current Design
Growth of investor activism with equity plans the only way to way to vote “no” on executive pay: proxy advisers
ISS Glass Lewis GMI (Audit Integrity, Corporate Library)
Institutional shareholders develop their own standards
Fidelity Vanguard Dimensional Davis
Environmental
6
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Past: Roots of Current Design
Examples of proxy advisers micro-managing equity plan design Burn rate Share Value Transfer Stock Ownership Guidelines Minimum vesting period No RSUs for executives Performance conditions (yes/no) Stock options do not count as “performance-based” Change-in-control and severance vesting Concentration of grants to CEO, NEOs
Environmental
Equity plan design norms reflect a collision of ownership-friendly regulation and attempts at punishing executive pay
through constraints on equity compensation
“I told you these were shadows of the things that have been,” said the Ghost. “That they are what they are, do not blame me!”
7
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Present: Where We Are
Say-on-Pay May have been “SOP lite” in 2011 Push-back on advisers/shareholders PR Roadshows Shareholder-voters with “limited time”
Only 37 (or 41) vote losses in 3,000+ companies 9 lawsuits (so far) Some research on what drove “no” votes
Another 40 were “close calls” – approval rates 51% to 70%
Some lawsuits filed Some suits not referencing SOP votes
Lower % approval for share plan proposals SOP did not relieve pressure on share plan votes Investors OK with executive pay still dislike dilution8
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Present: Where We Are
Primary implications for equity design Performance conditions for executives Performance measures that closely correlate to TSR SVT cost and plan features interact to affect votes
New transparency from ISS GRId scoring Points and weightings Allows assessment of trade-offs But no direct link to voting policy
Alternative views of pay (vs. fair value) Supplemental tables Realized pay/realizable pay Intrinsic value
“Independence” trend creates disjointed plan design between Compensation Committees (top five) and Everyone Else 9
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Present: Where We Are
Varying approaches for ownership requirements for officers
Multiple of base salary Dollar value Fixed number of shares Retention ratio
Variations in what “counts” as ownership
Unvested RSAs/RSUs In-the-money options (portion) Performance share units (target?)
“There are some upon this earth of yours,” returned the Spirit, “who lay claim to know us, and who do their deeds of passion, pride, ill-will, hatred, envy, bigotry, and selfishness in our name, who are as strange to us and all our kith and kin, as if they had never lived. Remember that, and charge their doings on themselves, not us.”
2012 proxy season may show increased investor activism over 2011
with continued focus on equity compensation10
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Future: What’s Next
Dodd-Frank: Great uncertainty in 2012/2013 Clawbacks CEO Pay Ratio disclosure CEO Pay-for-Performance disclosure
Say-on-Pay – Round Two in 2012 More scrutiny likely 2011 “close calls” may fail the vote this time 2011 failed votes provide blueprint for 2012
Risk of another downturn, more underwater equity Windfalls from 2009 exchanges/grants
remembered “Last straw” for equity in long-term flat/volatile
market
Continued move to cash plans Missed by many databases/surveys
This boy is Ignorance. This girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy, for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased.
11
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Other Issues: The Threat to Equity
European Union opposition to employee ownership
Harvard Business Review “no more equity to execs”
Academic studies: “no relationship to performance”
Company cash “hoards” coupled with dilution concerns
Employee skepticism
High market volatility increases “lottery” feeling
Global macroeconomic forces override companystrategy and performance as stock price driver
“Our EPS or Chinese interest rates and yuan value?”
“Men’s courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, if persevered in, they must lead,” said Scrooge. “But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change. Say it is thus with what you show me!” The Spirit was immovable as ever.
12
© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.© Copyright 2011. Compensation Venture Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Fred WhittleseyPrincipal ConsultantCompensation Venture Group, Inc.
206-388-9068 mobile206-780-5547 office
www.compensationventuregroup.com
Blog: http://payandperformance.blogspot.com
Twitter: FredWhittlesey
Contact Information