good practice guidelines for funders of microfinance presentation (2006) 28p r20090505 b
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Good Practice Guidelines For Funders of Microfinance
MICROFINANCE CONSENSUS GUIDELINES
• Purpose and target audience
• Inclusive financial systems and the role of funders
• Understanding the needs of poor clients
• Lessons learned and operational guidelines at three levels of the financial system
• Ensuring the effectiveness of funders
• Frontier issues
OverviewOverview
Commitment to applying good practice comes from the highest level 30 heads of agencies endorsed the Guidelines at the Better Aid for Access to Finance meeting in October 2006
High level endorsementHigh level endorsement
“Every person working for a funding agency is the repository of extraordinary power and can be a
catalyst of change.”Fazle Hasan Abed
Founder and Chairperson, BRAC
Raise awareness of good practice
Address the key question: What is the best use of subsidies?
Translate lessons learned into practical operational guidelines
Support diverse approaches within a framework of good practice principles
Purpose of the GuidelinesPurpose of the Guidelines
Staff of donors and investorsthat support microfinance
Target audienceTarget audience
Bi- & multilateral
development agencies
Regional development
banks
Social & commercial
investorsINGOs DFIs Foundations
A wide range of financial services for poor people everywhere
…delivered by different types of institutions
…through a variety of convenient mechanisms.
Vision for inclusive financial systemsVision for inclusive financial systems
Building inclusive financial systemsBuilding inclusive financial systems
Clients
Macro LevelLegislation, Regulation, Supervision
Micro LevelFinancial Service Providers
Meso LevelSupport Services and Infrastructure
Country-level mechanismsCountry-level mechanisms
Budget Support PRSPs
Integrate financial sector reforms within country-level
mechanisms
SWAPs
FSAPs
Financial service needs of poor clients Financial service needs of poor clients
• Poor clients need and are willing to pay for a variety of financial services
• Poor people save• Financial services for the poor should be demand-driven• Financial service providers are best placed to understand client
needs and design appropriate services • Microcredit may not be appropriate for every situation• Consumer protection initiatives can protect microfinance clients
from predatory lenders
Lessons learned
Financial service needs of poor clientsFinancial service needs of poor clients
• Verify that credit is truly needed • Do not use microcredit as a resource
transfer mechanism for high risk groups• Do not push financial institutions to develop
services that overload their capacity• Conduct due diligence to ensure financial
service providers have sufficient capacity before engaging in product development
• Provide flexible funding for research and development and technical assistance for capacity building
• Support consumer protection measures
Operational guidelines for funders
Sound ownership and governanceWide range of financial service providers is requiredFinancial sustainabilityImproving operational efficiencyLong-term commitment by donors and investors
Success factorsSuccess factors
Lack of strong retail capacityCredit componentsExternally funded savings-based community-managed loan fundsCrowding out commercial capital markets and/or domestic savers
Constraints and challengesConstraints and challenges
Lessons learned at the micro levelLessons learned at the micro level
Operational guidelines – micro levelOperational guidelines – micro level
• Let FSPs drive decisions• Promote transparency & accountability• Support improvements in efficiency
• Adapt funding to development stage• Use performance-based funding• Build exit strategies
The right match
Building capacity
Funding
• Find institutions with a shared vision• Take informed risks on promising FSPs• Assess FSPs properly
Constraints and challengesConstraints and challenges Success factorsSuccess factors
Lessons learned at the meso levelLessons learned at the meso level
Disappointing results of apex lending institutionsWeak institutional and human capacityLack of accurate, standardized, and comparable financial performance indicators
Building markets for support servicesInvestments in industry infrastructureAdvances in information systems and delivery technologiesInformation disclosure, contract enforcement
Operational guidelines – meso levelOperational guidelines – meso level
• Develop performance indicators for meso-level
• Promote transparency
• Technical assistance for organizational and product development
• Research and development on technology use
• Training and technical assistance to fill human resource gaps
• Work with existing service providers • Fund global or multi-country networks• Ensure capacity exists before funding
apexes
Support mesolevel institutions
Invest in
Foster transparency
Lessons learned at the macro levelLessons learned at the macro level
Constraints and challengesConstraints and challenges Success factorsSuccess factors
Low interest rate ceilings restrict poor people’s access to financial servicesGovernment-run credit programs generally distort markets because they are subject to political rather than commercial imperatives
Government’s primary role is as an enabler, not a direct provider of financial servicesGovernment’s most critical contribution is to maintain macroeconomic stabilityWork at the policy level requires public donor staff with specialized technical capacity and experience
Operational guidelines – macro levelOperational guidelines – macro level
Direct provision of credit services by a governmentGovernment-mandated portfolio quotasDirected creditBorrower loan guaranteesOperational subsidies
Interest rate liberalization Consumer protection
measures Policies that reduce barriers to
market entry of financial institutions
Building capacity of key government staff
Improved legal frameworks for collateral, taxation, and registration
Support Do NOT support
The role of donors and investorsThe role of donors and investors
Support interest rate liberalization, inflation control, & prudential regulation
and supervision of deposit-taking institutions
Strengthen capacity and extend services to microfinance
Strengthen to achieve financial sustainability to be able to reach
significant numbers of poor people
Clients
Macro Level
Micro Level
Meso Level
Strategic clarity
Staff capacity
Accountability for results
Knowledge management
Appropriate instruments
Lesson learned-what does it take for donors to be effective?Lesson learned-what does it take for donors to be effective?
Effectiveness
Donor effectivenessDonor effectiveness
• Define comparative advantage and determine the optimal level of involvement in microfinance
• Develop and disseminate agency-wide microfinance policies• Provide staff training• Establish strong technical contacts• Avoid credit components• Collect key performance information• Set up knowledge networks• Designate funding for knowledge generation and dissemination• Use a range of instruments• Place microfinance specialists within a financial/private-sector
development unit or department
Operational guidelines
Act on comparative advantageAct on comparative advantage
Expand Consolidate Delegate Phase out
Align actions
with strengths
Frontier issuesFrontier issues
• Effectiveness in post-conflict and post-disaster situations
• Reaching the remote poor• Measuring and improving accountability on social
performance• Applying delivery technology to reduce costs• Tapping domestic funding markets – emerging solutions • Graduating the poorest into microfinance
Many core issues remain unsolved….
Select experienced partnersPromote diverse financial services to help poor clients protect themselves from crisesSupport partners to develop natural disaster response policies
Post-conflict and post-disaster situationsPost-conflict and post-disaster situations
Respect good practices: market pricing, strict loan appraisal and collectionTake a long-term approach & avoid disbursement pressureProvide technical assistance to help manage the crisis
For microfinance to work:
political stabilitystable populations
sufficient economic activity
Reaching the remote poorReaching the remote poor
Help develop an enabling environmentBuild on existing playersFund innovationsUse grants to fund institutional capacityFind new ways to support member-based organizations
What funders can doChallenges
Dispersed and uneven demandHigh information and transaction costs because of poor infrastructure and lack of client informationWeak institutional capacity of rural finance providers
Measuring and improving accountability on social performanceMeasuring and improving accountability on social performance
Provide support for developing and refining common social performance toolsCollaborate with other funders to support tool and methodology refinementEncourage retail FSPs to track their social performance
What funders can doChallenges
No widely accepted, cost-effective indicators of social performanceLack of capacity to collect, analyze, and manage data to track social performanceLack of funding to develop methodologies
Applying delivery technology to reduce costsApplying delivery technology to reduce costs
Support experimentation and learning
Support consumer education
Ensure funding for technology is
complemented by capacity building
Work with governmentsto ensure appropriate
regulations
• Build capacity of financial service providers for pro-poor savings mobilization
• Explore using financial innovations to link microfinance to domestic funding markets
• Provide funding in local currency or enable microfinance institutions to be protected from currency movements
• Support broader capital markets development• Improve availability of performance information• Build methods for better understanding of true
liquidity needs
Tapping domestic funding markets –emerging solutionsTapping domestic funding markets –emerging solutions
Graduating the poorest into microfinanceGraduating the poorest into microfinance
• Provide grants for social safety net support and skills training programs
• Experiment with different models for linking the poorest clients to MFIs
• Develop appropriate ways to measure the cost effectiveness of non-financial service graduation programs
• Create barriers between grants and loan programs