gkodak fun time analysis
DESCRIPTION
kodak fun time anaysisTRANSCRIPT
ISSUES
Decline in Kodak’s market share from 76% to 70% over 5 years (1989 – 1994)
Decline in Kodak’s stock by 8% due to rumored price reduction in film
Increase in US dollar sales for both Polaroid and Fuji by 15% compared to 3% of Kodak’s
Lower priced brands such as Konica and Fuji gaining market share
REASONS
Photo film industry in maturity stage
Increasing competitors (Fuji, Konica, Agfa and 3M )
Competitive prices
Film seen as a normal commodity, often bought on price alone
Similar quality of products
Lower dealer margins for Kodak products
U.S. PHOTO FILM MARKET
• 16 billion color exposures made in 1993• Average growth rate of 2%
U.S. MARKET SHARE
CATEGORY PRICING
Four price tiers in the market:
Super-premium Brands (Kodak Ektar at 4.27$)
Premium Brands (Kodak Gold Plus at 3.49$)
Economy Brands
Price Brands
PURCHASING PATTERN OF CONSUMERS
QUALITY SCORE
THE FUNTIME STRATEGY
Three offerings in the product line with new technology
Gold Plus- same price, 60% advertising support
Royal Gold – ‘Ektar’ replacement, 9% premium over gold plus, 40% advertising support
Funtime – No advertising support, 20% lower price than Gold Plus
FUNTIME MARKETING PLAN
No advertising support
Film offered twice a year (off peak season)
Available in limited quantities
Offered in ISO 100 and ISO 200
THE ALTERNATIVES
Do Nothing
Reduce price of Gold Plus
Increase brand spend
Introduce economy series: Funtime No advertising and available all through the year
Will help increase sales but will adversely affect net profits No advertising and seasonal availability
It is the best of both worlds. This would increase market share whilst controlling cannibalization
With advertising and seasonal availability Can help to further capture market from competitors.
THE ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDATION
As per analysis
Funtime with advertising would be the best solution