gersh - action research.pdf

71
i DEVELOPING AND SUSTAINING THE INTEREST OF FORM TWO SHS STUDENTS IN ICT USING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION: A CASE STUDY OF NKAWIE SENIOR HIGH TECHNICAL SCHOOL AN ACTION RESEARCH REPORT PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA KUMASI CAMPUS IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION) BY RODOR GERSHON (5091040210) JUNE, 2013

Upload: rodor-gersh

Post on 11-Jan-2016

238 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

i

DEVELOPING AND SUSTAINING THE INTEREST OF FORM TWO SHS

STUDENTS IN ICT USING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION: A CASE STUDY OF

NKAWIE SENIOR HIGH TECHNICAL SCHOOL

AN ACTION RESEARCH REPORT PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION,

WINNEBA – KUMASI CAMPUS IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE

REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE

(INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION)

BY

RODOR GERSHON

(5091040210)

JUNE, 2013

Page 2: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This study owes its success to several people who assisted me in various ways and thus they

need acknowledgement. First of all, I wish to thank Almighty God Jehovah for his abundant

grace and favour bestowed on me throughout my education. Praise be unto His name forever.

I wish to thank my family (Parents and Sisters) for being there for me when all hope was lost.

Indeed, they were the force that kept me going.

My profound gratitude also goes to Mr. Gabriel Nyame, my supervisor, for taking time off

his tight schedules to meticulously go through this manuscript giving invaluable advice and

suggestions. I also thank my mentor, Mr Yawuliga K. Christopher for mentoring me during

my internship programme at Nkawie Senior High School (Technical).

I am eternally grateful to all the lecturers at the Information Technology Education

Department who played a significant role in my quest for knowledge in this University. The

task of putting thoughts and ideas together into a meaningful writing such as Action Research

is a very difficult endeavour. I therefore owe a debt of gratitude to the numerous authors

whose works were consulted and have been duly acknowledged at the references section.

Finally, to all friends, mates and group members especially Mad. Augustina Osei Owusu

Bempah, Hon. Peprah Amos & wife, Owusu-Ansah Winnifred, Osei Agyemang Rhoda,

Owusu Kenneth and Paitoo Gideon who showed me care and true friendship in hard times, I

say God richly bless you. Thank you all so much.

Page 3: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

iii

DECLARATION

STUDENT’S DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this Action Research is the result of my own original research and that

no part of it has been presented for another degree in this University or elsewhere.

SIGNATURE: ………………………… DATE: …………………………..

RODOR GERSHON

SUPERVISOR’S DECLARATION

I hereby declare that the preparation and presentation of this Action Research was supervised

in accordance with the guidelines on supervision of Action Research laid down by the

University of Education, Winneba.

SIGNATURE: ………………………… DATE: …………………………..

MR. GABRIEL NYAME

Page 4: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

iv

ABSTRACT

The researcher undertook this study at Nkawie Senior High Technical School, in the Atwima

Nwabiagya District in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Before the study, it was observed that

due to lack of facilities, most ICT teachers at Nkawie Senior High School use lecture and

discussion methods to teach lessons which otherwise should be practical and demonstration

oriented. The study compared and measured the effectiveness of computer-based PowerPoint

presentations and the traditional whiteboard as a visual stimulant. The study reviewed

literature on Effective Teaching and Learning Methods, Learning Styles/Modalities, Active

Learning and Combining Efficiency and Effectiveness in Teaching and Learning. Instruments

like observation, interview, questionnaire and student tests were used to gather data on the

research problem and also assess the effectiveness of the intervention strategy. The researcher

used the case study approach and descriptive and statistical tools were used to present results

and findings. The study found that ICT teachers did not use appropriate teaching methods

that would make the teaching and learning of ICT interesting to students. Thus students did

not enjoy ICT lessons. Also, students were not motivated to learn ICT as a subject because it

was not examinable. The study however proved that PowerPoint as a presentation style and

an aid to the lecture and discussion method of teaching improved students‟ performance and

enhanced interest.

Page 5: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

v

DEDICATION

I dedicate this work to my parents Mr. Rodor Alfred and Mad. Rodor Rose and sisters,

Comfort, Gladys, Rejoice and Mavis Rodor without whose love, support and prayers I

wouldn‟t have come this far.

Page 6: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENT PAGE

TITLE PAGE...... ................................................................................................................. i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................. ii

DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ iii

ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ iv

DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... vi

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix

LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ x

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ xi

CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................. 1

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background of the Study ........................................................................................... 1

1.2 Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................... 3

1.3 Purpose of the Study .................................................................................................. 3

1.4 Research Questions ................................................................................................... 4

1.5 Significance of the Study ........................................................................................... 5

1.6 Limitations of the Study ............................................................................................ 5

1.7 Delimitations of the Study ......................................................................................... 5

1.8 Organisation of the Study .......................................................................................... 6

CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................ 7

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ......................................................................... 7

2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Theoretical Framework of the Study .......................................................................... 7

2.2.1 Effective Teaching and Learning Methods ........................................................... 7

2.2.2 Learning Styles/Modalities .................................................................................. 7

2.2.3 Active Learning ................................................................................................... 9

2.2.4 Combining Efficiency and Effectiveness in Teaching and Learning ................... 10

2.3 Empirical Basis of the Study ................................................................................. 14

2.3.1 Students‟ Attitudes on Teaching Techniques and their Effect on Performance.... 15

Page 7: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

vii

2.3.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation to Whip Up Students‟ Interest in ICT ........... 16

2.3.3 Improving Students‟ Performance in ICT Lessons Using PowerPoint ................... 18

2.3.4 Lecture and Discussion Visual Aids: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard .................... 19

CHAPTER THREE .......................................................................................................... 21

METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 21

3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 21

3.2 Research Design ...................................................................................................... 21

3.3 Population and Sampling ......................................................................................... 23

3.3.1 Sampling Procedure ........................................................................................... 23

3.4 Data Collection Instruments..................................................................................... 25

3.4.1 Questionnaire ..................................................................................................... 25

3.4.2 Students‟ Tests................................................................................................... 25

3.4.3 Observation ....................................................................................................... 26

3.4.4 Interview ........................................................................................................... 26

3.5 Intervention Design and Implementation ................................................................. 27

3.5.1 Pre – Intervention .............................................................................................. 28

3.5.2 Intervention ....................................................................................................... 28

3.5.3 Post – Intervention ............................................................................................. 29

3.6 Data Collection Procedures ...................................................................................... 29

3.6.1 Observation ....................................................................................................... 30

3.6.2 Interview ........................................................................................................... 30

3.6.3 Tests .................................................................................................................. 30

3.6.4 Questionnaire ..................................................................................................... 31

3.7 Data Analysis .......................................................................................................... 31

CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................. 32

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................................ 32

4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 32

4.2 Pre – Intervention Results ........................................................................................ 32

4.2.1 The Effect of Students‟ Attitude towards the Teaching of ICT ............................ 32

4.2.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation ................................................................... 33

4.2.3 Improving Students‟ Performance in ICT using PowerPoint Presentations.......... 34

Page 8: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

viii

4.2.4 Visual Aids for Lecture and Discussion: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard ........... 36

4.3 Post Intervention Results .......................................................................................... 37

4.3.1 The Effect of Students‟ Attitude towards Teaching on their Performance ........... 37

4.3.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation to Boost Students‟ Interest in ICT Lessons 38

4.3.3 Improving Students‟ Performance in ICT using PowerPoint Presentations ......... 39

4.3.4 Visual Aids for Lecture and Discussion: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard............ 39

4.4 Discussion of Post Intervention Results ................................................................. 40

4.4.1 Students‟ Attitudes on Teaching Techniques and their Effect on Performance.... 40

4.4.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation to Boost Students‟ Interest in ICT Lessons 41

4.4.3 Improving Students‟ Performance in ICT using PowerPoint Presentations ......... 41

4.4.4 Visual Aids for Lecture and Discussion: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard............ 42

CHAPTER FIVE............................................................................................................... 43

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 43

5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 43

5.2 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................. 43

5.3 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 44

5.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................... 44

5.5 Suggestions for Further Research............................................................................. 45

REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 46

APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRE TO INVESTIGATE THE CAUSE OF LOW

INTEREST IN ICT AMONG FORM TWO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ...... 50

APPENDIX B: INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR ICT TUTORS ............................................. 53

APPENDIX C: OBSERVATION GUIDE FOR STUDENTS .......................................... 54

APPENDIX D: PRE – TEST ........................................................................................... 55

APPENDIX E: POST – TEST ......................................................................................... 58

APPENDIX F: RESEARCHER‟S INTERNSHIP ASSURANCE LETTER..................... 60

Page 9: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

ix

LIST OF TABLES

Table 4.1: Students‟ performance on pre-test ................................................................... 33

Table 4.2: Students‟ preference for lessons presented with PowerPoint ............................ 34

Table 4.3: Response to whether multimedia content in PowerPoint presentations

improved teaching and learning ...................................................................... 35

Table 4.4: The use of visual aids to retain more information ............................................ 36

Table 4.5: Post test results................................................................................................ 37

Table 4.6: Students‟ interest level after the intervention ................................................... 38

Table 4.7: Which visual aid helps to retain more information ........................................... 40

Page 10: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

x

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 4.1: Students‟ pre-test and post-test scores ............................................................ 42

Page 11: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

xi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CRDD----------- – Curriculum Research and Development Division

ICT-------------- – Information and Communications Technology

MOE------------- – Ministry of Education

Page 12: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

1

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

It has been observed and established that Senior High School students are a difficult

audience. Research further asserts that academics drop in early adolescence (Anderman &

Maehr, 1994 as cited in Ryan & Patrick, 2001). High school teachers have to compete with

students‟ friends, heightened physiological/psychological changes and the media.

Teachers are therefore always looking for that perfect technique that attracts these unruly

teenagers‟ attention and at the same time teach them something. It is against this backdrop

that teachers and educational researchers indulge in the search for the most effective

presentation method. Teachers are making efforts to adopt appropriate and effective methods

to improve the teaching and learning of Information and Communications Technology in the

Senior High Schools. This chapter dwells on the problem identified and relates the

background information relevant to the problem.

1.1 Background of the Study

As Information and Communications Technology (ICT) gains grounds globally, it has

become imperative for policy makers and strategists to integrate this emerging force into the

national plan for growth and development. It is an undeniable fact that ICTs play a very

important role in the development of every nation these days. This is because growth is

induced by the flow of information and this realization has led most economies into

knowledge based ones.

Developing countries have realized this and are rigorously pursuing the use of ICTs as a

platform for socio-economic development. It is also true that the critical workforce of these

Page 13: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

2

developing countries are the youth graduating from the Senior High Schools, Polytechnics,

the Universities and the Professional training institutions. But the question is “are these

graduates trained adequately to handle critical information in a knowledge based world?”

In Ghana, the use of computer technology for teaching and learning began to receive the

government‟s attention in the past decade. In the Recommendations of the report of Professor

Jophus Anamuah –Mensah‟s Educational Review Committee of 2007, the thirteenth point

states that “Greater emphasis will be put on Information and Communications Technology

(ICT) and Science and Technology”. In consonance with this recommendation, the Ministry

of Education together with the Curriculum Research and Development Division (CRDD)

came out with a new syllabus for the teaching and learning of ICT in the Junior and Senior

High Schools.

The rationale for the introduction of this new syllabus was to provide basic skills in

Information and Communications Technology (ICT) for Junior and Senior High School

students. It is also expected that the knowledge and skills gained in this course will help

students to use ICT in almost all their courses at school.

At all levels of the educational system, attempts have been made by the Ministry of

Education to support institutions in the teaching and learning of ICT literacy. Most

secondary, and some basic schools have computers.

The problem facing most Senior High Schools is the lack of infrastructure and facilities like

computer laboratories, computers and projectors. Most often, ICT teachers in schools where

there are no computer laboratories with computers for students to practise, use the lecture and

discussion method of teaching. Conversely, most ICT lessons are supposed to be

Page 14: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

3

demonstration and practically oriented. This leads to the waning of interest in ICT among

students. As a result, students perform poorly in ICT internal examinations. Teachers are in

most cases blamed for the poor performance of students. It has therefore become the priority

of most teachers to use innovative strategies of teaching to salvage the situation in cases

where there are limited facilities.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The success of teaching and learning in the Senior High Schools has become the onerous

duty of the teacher alone. Teachers are therefore seen as architects in the classroom who

meticulously custom-design all instruction to ensure that learning becomes easy for students.

It was noted, however, that due to inhibiting situations such as lack of facilities, most ICT

teachers at Nkawie Senior High School just use lecture and discussion method to teach

lessons which otherwise should be practical and demonstration oriented. This has the

tendency of making lessons boring and monotonous and thus making students lose interest in

the course of study. This study considers the problem of adolescence, infrastructural and time

constraints, and researches into the most effective teaching techniques. The question is,

“which visual aid makes the lecture and discussion most efficient at enabling the student to

acquire the information? The study compares and measures the effectiveness of computer-

based PowerPoint and the traditional whiteboard as a visual stimulant. Also, will students do

better with a computer presentation or will a whiteboard presentation provide benefits that

will enable students to retain and master more content?

1.3 Purpose of the Study

This research is aimed at providing ICT teachers in the Senior High Schools, empirical

evidence of innovative teaching techniques that not only arouse students‟ interest in the

Page 15: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

4

subject but also improve their academic performance significantly. The benefits of this study

are more profound in schools where there are limited resources to facilitate the teaching and

learning of ICT. The specific objectives of the project are:

1. To find out the perception of students regarding the use of whiteboard and PowerPoint

presentations in teaching of ICT.

2. To identify the causes of disregard among students regarding ICT lessons.

3. To investigate how to arouse and sustain the interest of students in ICT using

PowerPoint presentation.

4. To assess the impact of PowerPoint and whiteboard presentations on the academic

performance of students.

1.4 Research Questions

The following questions were raised to guide the researcher to achieve the research

objectives:

1. How do students‟ attitudes towards teaching techniques affect their interest level and

performance in ICT lessons?

2. To what extent will PowerPoint presentation as compared to whiteboard illustrations help

enhance students‟ interest and performance in ICT lessons?

3. How can PowerPoint Presentations be used effectively to improve students‟ performance

in ICT?

4. When combined with lecture and discussion, which visual aid enables students to learn

more, the whiteboard or PowerPoint?

Page 16: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

5

1.5 Significance of the Study

The study is expected to improve to a large extent student‟s interests in ICT as a whole. Also,

the study will help teachers to adopt effective teaching strategies to motivate students to

actively participate in ICT lessons. Finally, the result of the study will help school authorities

to give teachers the required assistance for the implementation of effective teaching strategies

like the PowerPoint presentations to improve the academic performance of students and the

school as a whole.

1.6 Limitations of the Study

The researcher encountered some problems in this study. There was limited time frame for

the study. The researcher during the internship program had about one semester within which

to carry out the action research work coupled with the heavy teaching schedule.

Also, not all the questionnaires that were sent out were retrieved. Some of the students took

the questions but did not submit them and therefore, all their views could not be sampled.

1.7 Delimitations of the Study

The study was confined to Form Two General Arts 2 & 3 classes of Nkawie Senior High

School (Technical) in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. The choice of this scope was

necessitated by the fact that, the researcher had his internship program in the school during

which the problem of was identified. The researcher therefore took on the challenge in

finding solution to this problem in order to improve teaching and learning, as well as

students‟ performance in the school.

Page 17: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

6

1.8 Organisation of the Study

The study is made up of five chapters. Chapter one deals with the introduction, background

of the study, statement of the problem, purpose of the study, research questions and

significance of the study, limitation, delimitation and organization of the study. The review of

related literature on the study is contained in chapter two. It also talks about the theories on

which the study is based and the empirical basis of the study. Chapter three discusses the

research design, population and sampling, data collection techniques, data collection

procedure and data analysis and intervention design. Chapter four highlights the results or

findings of the study whilst the summary of the study, conclusion and recommendations for

future researchers are captured in chapter five.

Page 18: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

7

CHAPTER TWO

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Introduction

There have been a lot of studies into the effective ways of delivering instruction to students.

Very few of these studies focused on the use of ICT tools to assist the teaching and learning

of ICT as a subject. This chapter provides a discussion on previous works related to the use of

computer-assisted instruction, particularly PowerPoint presentation in delivering ICT lessons.

2.2 Theoretical Framework of the Study

This section provides an overview into theories that touch on the use of presentation software

to deliver instruction. It further talks on the factors that affect teaching and learning and how

these contribute to the effectiveness of using presentation software to present lessons.

2.2.1 Effective Teaching and Learning Methods

There is an unfathomable amount of information regarding most effective teaching methods.

However, there are two theories that are prominent. One theory encourages the teacher to

understand the different learning styles and demands that the teacher provides a variety of

lessons that respond to these differences. The other articulates the need for lessons to promote

active participation and learning.

2.2.2 Learning Styles/Modalities

It is understood that no two people are alike and no two people learn in the same way. People

process, organize, and react to new information differently. These different responses are

called learning styles. Wilson (1998) explained that there are many different elements that

affect a person‟s learning style. They are learning modalities, emotionality, motivation,

Page 19: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

8

internal processing, personality, personal background, and the environment. There is a wide

variety of information on all of these elements.

Theorists who prescribe to the “learning modalities” principle stated that students possess

several learning modalities: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. These scholars asserted that to

be effective, teachers must understand and consider their choices of teaching techniques with

regard to student‟s learning modalities (Wilson, 1998). For example, to meet the needs of

visual learners, teachers need to present materials that students can see. For auditory

learners, sound must be an aspect of the lessons. Finally, to teach kinesthetic learners,

lessons should be physically active. However, there is a debate on how to determine a

students‟ learning modality.

Dunn and Dunn (1993) are the proponents of the theory of “learning modality preferences”.

They pointed out that students have particular preferences with regard to how information

was presented to them. According to them students learn best when the teacher uses

techniques that take their modality preferences into consideration (Wilson, 1998).

Brown(1996) demonstrated that students mostly preferred kinesthetically based lessons (as

cited in Miller, 2001). A study done by Specific Diagnostic Studies mirrored that finding (as

cited in Miller, 2001). Based on this theory, teachers aim at providing much more hands-on

activities because these activities most likely motivate students to learn.

In contrast, Barbe, Milone, and Swassing (1970) claimed that rather than taking an inventory

of likenesses, teachers should focus on which methods actually produced better learning

results. This theory is called “The Modalities Strengths Model”. The authors contended that

a person‟s preference in learning was not necessarily their strength. The study, done much

Page 20: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

9

earlier than Brown‟s, indicated that only 15 percent of people actually learned best

kinesthetically (as cited in Miller, 2001). Therefore, preference may not be the best predictor

of actual retention of knowledge. According to the theory, teachers need to observe,

experiment and test to determine which methods prove to be the most effective techniques.

However, the two methods were not as far apart as the research seemed to suggest. They

agreed that each person possesses all of the modalities just in different ways. A person might

prefer or be stronger in one method but they still retain the other modalities and the ability to

access and utilize them. Similarly, a person‟s strengths or preferences in one situation may

be different in another (Miller, 2001). A different day, a different subject, a different year

could be the determining factor with regards to their learning style. Therefore, a variety of

techniques that hits all learning modalities would be the most effective at transmitting

knowledge to students (Wilson, 1998).

2.2.3 Active Learning

Active Learning is another aspect of education that scholars hype as a necessary component

to learning. To be actively learning, a student should be engaged in the learning. Engagement

could be measured in several ways and is a topic that is much too broad to be exhaustively

discussed here. However, participation in the learning process is an essential element in

engagement and active learning (Ryan & Patrick, 2001). Slavin (1990), discussed the role of

participation and active learning. He emphasized that a good learning environment requires

students to be intellectually active. Later, he provided data that proved that students actually

learn better when they are actively involved (as cited in Hendrix, 1999).

Cooperative Learning and Small-Group Work were often cited as effective learning

techniques because students are most active during these activities (Laney, 1999; Rathunde &

Page 21: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

10

Csikszentmihalyi, 2005; Chiodo & Byford, 2004). Since the activities are student-centred,

students are naturally engaged in the process of learning. Many proponents of cooperative

learning looked negatively on whole-class instruction since it was perceived as teacher-

centred and inactive (Bolliger, 2003).

In contrast, other authors pointed out that active learning did not only occur in small groups.

It was also achieved through whole-class activities by way of teacher-student interaction. If

the teacher requires student participation during whole-class instruction, it becomes active

(Ryan & Patrick, 2001). Future teachers are shown techniques that require participation while

in a whole-class format. In summary, teacher led, whole-class activities can be engaging and

active as long as they are not teacher-centred lessons. For the lesson to be most effective,

students need to participate in the process by interacting with the teacher and each other.

2.2.4 Combining Efficiency and Effectiveness in Teaching and Learning

Efficiency is the quality of being able to do a task successfully without wasting time or

energy while effectiveness is the ability to perform a task well and produce the intended or

desired results. This section looks at the effectiveness and efficiency of teaching and learning

techniques together with their teaching and learning aids.

2.2.4.1 Lecture and Discussion

As widely accepted, although arguable that lecture is one of the most efficient methods of

teaching, there is little quantitative, testable data on the effectiveness of lecture. But, when

applying the theories of Learning Modalities and Active Learning, lecture alone does not

work as an effective teaching strategy. Lecture method does not reach all learning styles

(Pennell, 2000; Sultan & Jones, 1995). When just lecturing, auditory students‟ learning

Page 22: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

11

needs are met but other modalities such as visual and kinesthetic, are left behind. Active

Learning is rare with lecture as well. Many critics of lecture method of instruction pointed to

the inherent passivity of the method (Chiodo & Byford, 2004; Bolliger, 2003; Hendrix, 1999;

Pennell, 2000; Shrock & Shrock, 1994). During lecture lessons, students sit and listen and

not participate in the learning.

For active involvement in lecture, something must be added. Numerous sources cited

discussion as an essential element for an effective lesson (Namathaka et al. 2000; Henderson,

Winitzky, & Kauchak, 1996 as cited in Pennell, 2000). Pennell (2000) contended that adding

discussion to a traditional lecture changed the lesson from passive to active because the

students are interacting with the teacher and other students. In addition, asking questions at

different challenging levels would enable more students to be active since their different

cognitive levels would be met (Namathaka et al., 2000). Further, Chiodo and Byford (2004)

were of the view that, “teaching with discussion enables students to develop an understanding

of specific issues”. They explained that good lectures must be dialog-based not didactic.

Teachers are part of the learning process in tandem with the students, not the only part of it.

When the lecture includes the students, it makes it more active.

2.2.4.2 Visual Aids

Research determined that discussion increased the effectiveness of the efficient lecture

because active involvement matured. However, the auditory learning style was the only

modality addressed. Visual learners were still ignored. Many authors demanded that in an

effort to meet other learners‟ needs, visual aids should be added (Sultan & Jones, 1995). The

traditional approach to a visual aid is the whiteboard or blackboard. Not much research is

available on the effectiveness of the whiteboard or blackboard as a standalone. One book

Page 23: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

12

discussed the importance of writing legibly, where to stand when using the blackboard, and

how to erase it (Namathaka et al., 2000).

A more modern, technological approach requires a computer software program. PowerPoint

by Microsoft is a popular option. Teachers can create slides with the lecture information on it

and project it for the class to see. Images, sounds, and motion can be added to increase the

effectiveness. Dils (2000) and Sultan and Jones (1995) were emphatic that multimedia

software such as PowerPoint provided more opportunities to reach multiple learning styles.

In addition, these types of visuals, which can be colourful and animated, allowed learners to

process the information in a more constructive way (Mayer, 1996 as cited in Larson, 2001;

Stone, 1999).

One particular theory is widespread. The modern world calls for modern teaching techniques.

Students today are constantly encountering technology. In order for teachers to reach these

technology-savvy students, the teachers need to use technology-inspired techniques (Frey &

Birnbaum, 2002; Larson, 2001). Using traditional visual aids can bore students into

passivity. Stone (1999), commented that one advantage of computer lecture-ware is that the

visual aspects can be engaging to students raised in a video world and thus make a traditional

lecture less passive.

Since both the idea of using the computer as a teacher aid in lectures and the availability of

computer projection screens are relatively new, there are only a few studies that have

quantitatively measured the effectiveness of computers on learning. Goldberg and Richards

(1995) established that test scores improved in high-tech high schools such as CO-NECT (as

cited in Larson, 2001). Another study completed more recently by the North Central

Regional Laboratory also discovered that technology helped increase the scores on

Page 24: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

13

standardized achievement tests (as cited in Larson, 2001). Finally, Yang (1991) reported that

lessons using textbooks and worksheets were inferior to computer-based instruction. When

attention was paid more directly to computer-aided teacher presentations, benefits were still

reported, although conditionally. Kozma (1991) reported that if the teacher used good

software (one in which the programmer understood learning styles and processing), then

learning improved (as cited in Beets & Lobingier, 2001).

Not all research was positive on the use of software applications for teacher presentations.

Even in 1983, some researchers refused to just accept the notion that new always means

better. Clark (1983) stated that no research had proved that a variety of media improved

learning (as cited in Beets & Lobingier, 2001). Frey and Birnbaum (2002), writing much

later than and definitely not as contentious as Clark, concurred. They proclaimed that

PowerPoint still remained a passive learning method.

Due to the contradictory nature of the debate, it is not surprising that Beets and Lobingier

(2001) reported that many teachers were unwilling to give up their traditional lectures for

PowerPoint and other technology-based presentation methods. Many felt that the work

necessary to create these presentations outweighed any benefits they could reap.

Larson (2001) did little to convince those sceptical teachers. He conducted a study of fifth

graders. He used PowerPoint for one lecture and another teacher used a traditional lecture

method with worksheets for the other. Later, the students switched teachers and received the

other method. Both classes were tested after each lesson. Larson reported no significant

statistical difference in their test scores. He concluded that the PowerPoint may be more

motivating but it had no effect on knowledge retention. It is clear that the work did not

Page 25: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

14

mention whether or not another visual aid was added to the traditional lecture as a

replacement for the PowerPoint. However, a few studies exists that measure the

effectiveness of PowerPoint versus a traditional whiteboard/blackboard visual. Lowry (1999)

was positive towards PowerPoint. He demonstrated that the students‟ grades went up when

PowerPoint was used (as cited in Frey & Birnbaum, 2002). This notion was reemphasized by

Dils (2000 ) and he declared that he received similar results.

On the other side of the debate, Beets and Lobingier (2001) came out with findings similar to

Larson‟s (2001) study; no evidence that PowerPoint was better for retention than was the

whiteboard/blackboard. Students‟ questionnaires demonstrated several reasons why

PowerPoint might not be as beneficial as peddled. Several students mentioned that professors

often moved faster through the material when it was already written on the PowerPoint. One

observation noted that teachers automatically went slower when using the blackboard

because they had to pause to write it down.

Researchers do not seem to agree on which visual aid best complements lecture and

discussion methods of teaching. Although, in the end, all seem to agree that visual aids are

an essential element to any lesson. Both whiteboards and PowerPoint have specific

advantages and disadvantages with PowerPoint having an edge over whiteboard.

2.3 Empirical Basis of the Study

This section reviews studies conducted by notable researchers and scholars in the field of

using presentation software to improve students‟ performance in teaching and learning.

Page 26: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

15

2.3.1 Students’ Attitudes on Teaching Techniques and their Effect on Performance

An attitude is a personal view of something or an opinion, or general feeling about something

which translates into the way one behaves towards that thing. A commonly held belief is that

students prefer to exercise control over their course of study. This assumes that they are

capable of making such decisions as to which technique of instruction best suits them and

that provision for such control will be a motivating factor reflected in an increased rate of

learning. However, little experimental data exist to support this belief. This section discusses

the effect of students‟ attitude on teaching techniques and how they affect their performance.

Much research has been done in the field of academic achievement and many authors have

given their suggestions about the factors that influence students‟ performance within the

school environment. Two of these factors include student attitudes and school context.

Against this theoretical background, it is necessary to look at how important these two factors

are and exactly how they affect student outcomes. The relationship between students‟ attitude

and academic performance is further discussed. Research has shown that a large number of

students‟ performances are affected by their attitudes towards specific subjects, education and

academics in general (Nouri & Szanti, 2005). It has been suggested that when students

demonstrate weak commitment to their academics then they are bound to underperform.

Additionally, some students with an unrealistic view of themselves may perform poorly too.

For instance, those who tend to be overconfident or naive about the requirements of their

academics may register very poor performance. Conversely, when students do not believe in

themselves or when they have low self-confidence, chances are that they will underachieve

(Nouri & Szanti, 2005). Sometimes some students may think of themselves as people who

cannot control their own destiny. They imagine that they are victims of the system and this

Page 27: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

16

can lead to academic failure. In other scenarios some students may be too proud to ask for

help when they encounter a problem in their studies (Nouri & Szanti, 2005). Also, some

students find it difficult to grow or develop because they tend to resist change and this

impedes their academic progress. In other situations, a student may not work well in groups

yet this is a necessary part of the academic environment.

Teaching and learning, more than any other part of the student‟s experience is an area where

the school can control the input to the student experience. A great deal of discussion in the

student retention literature suggests that if students are offered „student centred‟ approaches

in the classroom and other aspects of their academic course, they enjoy it more and prove less

likely to underperform. However, the attitudes of students to the experience offered to them

are crucial. Johnson (2007) discusses the problem that „student centered‟ teaching can be

unpopular with certain students who lack motivation or confidence, because students who are

placed at the „centre‟ of their learning experience need to work hard and consistently.

2.3.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation to Whip Up Students’ Interest in ICT

Slide presentation software such as PowerPoint has become an integrated part of many

instructional settings, particularly in large classes and in courses more geared toward

information exchange than skill development. PowerPoint can be a highly effective tool to

aid learning, but if not used carefully, may instead disengage students and actually hinder

learning.

PowerPoint is undeniably a powerful tool when it comes to making a presentation, but there

are some divided viewpoints and some considerations to keep in mind when considering the

use of PowerPoint as a teaching tool. For example Maddux & Aberasturi, (2008). focused on

Page 28: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

17

the use of technology in education and argues that, from the teacher's perspective, the use of

PowerPoint may be something of a trade-off. Although PowerPoint-based presentations are

more portable, and can be saved for repeated use, they typically take longer to assemble than

writing the same material on a blackboard or an overhead. In addition, learning to use

PowerPoint well takes time, and depending on a school's infrastructure and commitment to

technology, training opportunities and reliable presentation gear may vary in availability.

On the other hand, many creative teachers from around the country have been able to take

PowerPoint to the next level in the classroom. They have designed presentations that focus on

involving students, as well as activities that instruct students how to use PowerPoint to

express their own ideas as part of a project or group assignment. Such activities can capitalize

on the strengths of this presentation software as an easy-to-use visual display medium that

can be used to engage visual learners and capture students' attention and interest.

PowerPoint's ability to incorporate photos, graphics, animation, even sound and video,

meshes well with the more visually-oriented aspects of the curriculum, and this can be

especially effective with younger children and adolescents.

Using PowerPoint improve the students‟ learning motivation, increasing authentic materials

for study, encouraging interaction between the teacher and the students. According to Miller

(2001), people remember pictures/visuals more and PowerPoint presentations provide a

plethora of ways of incorporating images during lectures. He warns however that, images

also deter us from reading the material from slides. You only have to include visuals that

relate to the lecture.

Attention and interest can be captured voluntarily or involuntarily. Involuntary – a person‟s

attention is captured by novel or salient information, presented at a surprising location;

Page 29: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

18

Presented in an “important” colour, etc. Voluntary attention capture depends solely on the

audience; to make an effortful attempt to focus on relevant material discarding the

unimportant material. The Point is that, like any other teaching and learning tool, PowerPoint

requires some goals and objectives in mind to achieve successfully. It is obvious that training,

knowing how PowerPoint works and what it can do is important to the effectiveness of lesson

delivery.

2.3.2.1 The Most Common Abuses of PowerPoint Presentation

The most common abuses in PowerPoint use for teaching and learning include visually poor

or boring slides. Too many texts on the slide do not support good reading of text, other

abuses for example, inappropriate use of multimedia options, for example too much

animation or over use of slide transitions. Further, many teachers do not have enough basic

knowledge in applying PowerPoint in teaching learning. In addition, PowerPoint cannot

handle unexpected situations because PowerPoint is unable to handle the students‟ questions

immediately as the teachers do.

2.3.3 Improving Students’ Performance in ICT Lessons Using PowerPoint

Technological advances and a media-savvy audience have led to a boom in the use of

multimedia presentations in college classrooms. Multimedia formats are popular with faculty

and students alike. In fact, faculty and students perceive that the use of multimedia

presentations improves student learning (Hogarty, Lang, and Kromrey 2003). The empirical

evidence supporting this perception is inconsistent, however. According to Lowry (1999),

multimedia presentations can improve student test scores significantly. Additionally, the

results indicated that students who had already proven themselves to be above-average

academic performers received far more benefits from multimedia presentations than students

Page 30: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

19

of below-average academic performance. A possible explanation for these positive findings is

that these college students are technologically savvy and better able to process high-tech

deliveries. This series of results provides support for dual-coding theory, which predicts that

student learning improves when material is presented both visually and verbally as opposed

to having either visual or verbal presentation alone. It is recommended that teachers match

their use of technology with the degree of technological savvy of their audience.

2.3.4 Lecture and Discussion Visual Aids: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard

A study conducted by Maddux, C., & Aberasturi, S. (2008) sought to investigate whether

there was a difference in student recall of information or in student verbal interaction after

lectures using PowerPoint versus the same lectures featuring two traditional lecture formats

(lecture with overhead transparencies and lecture without visual presentation aid). The results

showed that the method of material presentation does affect students‟ retention of the

information as measured by a multiple-choice quiz over lecture content.

The wide acceptance of PowerPoint is due to its many advantages. Screens with great

complexity and high visual appeals can be produced quickly and easily. Graphics that have

been scanned from traditional media or copied from the Internet can be combined with text or

other material. The ability to make use of multimedia materials may make it easier for

instructors to address different learning preferences and styles (Daniels, 1999).

Further, research suggests that student attention is enhanced if information is presented in

more than one modality (Lowry 1999). In the classroom setting, PowerPoint is often used as

a lecture aid for visual support of oral presentations or lectures, and supporters suggest it can

help ensure that the main points of a lecture are clearly made. According to Stone (1999),

Page 31: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

20

PowerPoint helps speakers organize their thoughts and present them in a clear and concise

manner while using multi-sensory tactics to hold audience attention.

Results of such studies typically show that students tend to prefer lectures with PowerPoint to

lectures with just blackboard illustrations. It goes without saying that good teaching is not

simply presenting content to students, but must foster students‟ connections to content and

promote student retention of facts and concepts (Yang, 1991). Also critical is the effect of

any teaching aid on verbal interaction between students and the instructor, or students with

other students. In fact, verbal interaction is considered highly desirable by most instructors,

and discussion is generally believed to enhance understanding and retention.

It was obvious that, lectures using PowerPoint presentations as a visual aid resulted in better

student retention of the material than traditional lectures with no presentation aids or with the

whiteboard as a presentation aid.

A review of the literature related to the use of PowerPoint presentations as a visual aid in

delivering ICT lessons has revealed that PowerPoint has a great potential to arouse and

sustain learners‟ interest, increase performance and make lessons more interactive. These

desired benefits can be however achieved when PowerPoint is used incorporating the factors

this literature has uncovered as relevant to the effective use of PowerPoint. The subsequent

chapter considers the methodology used in this study and how PowerPoint presentations were

used in lesson presentations.

Page 32: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

21

CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

This study was conducted to find answers to various questions relating to the teaching and

learning of ICT in the Senior High Schools. It emphasized the use of PowerPoint as a visual

aid in teaching and whether such a tool is capable of helping to improve learning on the parts

of students.

This chapter gives a description of the research procedures or the research methodology used

for the study. It covers research design, population and sampling, data collection techniques,

data collection procedures and data analysis.

3.2 Research Design

The methodology the researcher selected for this study is a mixed-method. The researcher

decided on the case study research strategy and a descriptive research design due to the

nature of the problem.

According to Amoani (2005), the descriptive analysis design is an attempt at providing an

accurate description of an on – going situation or real life setting. This approach describes a

relationship that exists between variables. Hendricks (2009) also opines that descriptive

research studies are designed to obtain pertinent and precise information in order to draw

valid generalizations, and conclusions from facts obtained.

With regard to the time aspect of research methodology, a cross-section methodology is what

best suits the format chosen by the researcher. According to Darling-Hammond and Snyder

(2000), action research is a form of authentic assessment which “contextualises teaching” and

Page 33: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

22

allows teachers to move beyond personal reflection to a more rigorous and structured

examinations of challenges they might be having in teaching.

The researcher was moved by the poor attitude of students towards the study of ICT which

translated into poor performance when tests were conducted. This was perceived as a

problem which needs to be studied and remedied by the researcher. Against this background,

a choice of research method found among the numerous methodologies for this research was

the descriptive research design.

Also, the selection of case study approach was informed by the flexibility that it provides for

researchers to tackle problems on the ground through the process of;

Making explicit assumptions about how and why things work (Problem)

Planning an act(intervention) to improve the situation

Carrying out the intervention that has been planned

Observing what happens as a result of the intervention

Reflecting on the observations and

Planning another intervention based on the reformulated hypothesis (i.e. if previous

intervention was not effective).

The case study strategy was chosen because it lets the researcher analyses many variables on

the research problem and sees what factors can be controlled to bring about desired changes.

The case study strategy helps to carry out a more profound study to really address the

problem identified.

Page 34: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

23

3.3 Population and Sampling

Population is defined as the entire collection of a set of objects, people, or events, in a

particular context. The population is the entire group of persons or objects that is of interest

to the researcher.

The study was conducted at Nkawie Senior High School (Technical) in the Atwima

Nwabiagya District of the Ashanti Region. The school has a population of about 3,000

students. This number is made up of both streams of the education system currently running

in Ghana; the four-year stream and the three-year stream offering programmes in various

disciplines.

The researcher sampled 100 students of both sexes offering different programmes from the

three classes that he handled – 2GA2, 2GA3/4 and 2HS.

The classes were heterogeneous with regards to ethnic, socioeconomic, and academic ability

backgrounds. Four teachers who taught in the ICT department were also sampled out of the

total of eight ICT teachers in the school.

3.3.1 Sampling Procedure

Sampling is a systematic process of selecting a portion of the designated population to

represent the entire population in a study. The basic idea of sampling is to select some of the

elements in a population to enable us draw conclusions about the entire population.

The population for the study was the entire Form Two (2nd

year) students of the school and a

teaching staff population of about 172 of which ICT teachers were 8. The researcher taught

three classes; 2GA2, 2GA3/4 and 2HS with class sizes of 148, 66 and 94 students

Page 35: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

24

sizesampleActual

populationTotalKIntervalSampling )(

,348

148)22( GAK

,322

66)4/32( GAK

,330

94)2( HSK

respectively which totalled 308 students. Out of the 308 students from the three classes

handled by the researcher, it was practical to use a sample size of only 100 students for the

study due to constraints of time and resources. The 100 students were selected

proportionately from the three classes with 48 students from 2GA2, 22 students from 2GA3/4

and 30 students from 2HS.

The specified number of students from each class was selected using the systematic method

of probabilistic sampling. The sampling interval was calculated using the mathematical

formula:

To get the sample quota from 2GA2, the researcher randomly selected the first student from a

numbered class list of the students. Subsequent students were selected by simply adding the

sampling interval which is three (3) to the first student selected till the required number was

obtained. The researcher replicated the same procedure in the remaining two classes i.e.

2GA3/4 and 2HS.

The researcher selected four (4) teachers from the ICT department using simple random

sampling procedure because it offered each teacher the opportunity of being selected.

Page 36: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

25

3.4 Data Collection Instruments

The nature of the problem informed the researcher to employ the underlisted instruments to

help solicit information about the problem.

3.4.1 Questionnaire

Hendricks (2009) describes a questionnaire as a set of carefully designed questions given in

exactly the same form to a group of people in order to collect data about some topic(s) in

which the researcher is interested.

The researcher designed a questionnaire of 15 items to collect data from the participants of

the study. The questionnaire for students was aimed at finding out why students exhibited

such indifferent attitude towards ICT lessons, which method of teaching was enjoyable to

them the most and what suggestions they had for their ICT tutors. The questionnaires were

given to students in class to respond to. This was because the researcher wanted to be there to

clear out any misunderstandings even though the questionnaires were pre-tested on a handful

of students from different classes and anomalies corrected. The questionnaire proved valid

because it was pre-tested to find out how best it would measure what it was meant to and also

during administration, the researcher was there to clear doubts. The reliability of the

questionnaire could not be comprehensively ascertained for the reason that it was not

administered more than once on the same subjects. However, on different subjects as with the

different classes the researcher administered the questionnaire which proved reliable.

3.4.2 Students’ Tests

A test is a series of questions, problems, or physical responses designed to determine

knowledge, intelligence, or ability. (Johnson , 2007). A series of tests were conducted by the

Page 37: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

26

researcher on the participants during the pre-intervention, intervention and post intervention

stages of the study.

The researcher thought it inexpedient to administer the same test twice to the same

respondents and therefore provided tests that contained a series of items intended to measure

the same attribute – say listing of steps to follow in performing similar operations in Word

processing. This enhanced the reliability of the instrument. Validity was also ensured since

the researcher test items by himself.

3.4.3 Observation

Observation is way of gathering data by watching behaviour, events, or noting physical

characteristics in their natural setting. Observations can be overt (everyone knows they are

being observed) or covert (no one knows they are being observed and the observer is

concealed).

Because the problem was attitudinal, the researcher employed the observation method to find

out more about the attitudes. The observation was covert because the students knew they

were being observed. The choice of observation as a data collection instrument proved valid

since it happened in the natural context with no attempt by the researcher to influence the

actions of the students being observed. It also proved reliable as the result of the observation

was consistent.

3.4.4 Interview

Interview refers to the collection of data by asking people questions and following up or

probing their answers. Interview was used as a tool to find out about what the students really

Page 38: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

27

felt about the teaching and learning of ICT. The interview format used was unstructured

interview where questions were asked and based on their responses, follow up questions

could be added. The interview sessions provided a lot of information to the researcher.

It became clear through the interviews that students felt ICT was not important because it was

not examinable at the end of their programme. Another fact that was revealed through the

interview was lack of ICT teaching and learning facilities. It was established that there was

no computer laboratory and computers for students to learn with. This resulted in teachers

using lecture and discussion method to teach all ICT lessons which the students claimed was

unexciting. The choice of interview as an instrument for this research was both valid and

reliable. It was valid because it measured what the researcher actually wanted to measure.

Also it was reliable since it provided consistent result from the numerous students

interviewed.

3.5 Intervention Design and Implementation

After observing students and administering questionnaire to obtain data about the problem,

the researcher designed a well thought-out intervention strategy meant to address the

situation. The intervention design was in the form of employing the use of PowerPoint

presentations to serve as visual aids and at the same time delivering course content to

students.

The designing and implementation of the intervention was carried out in three phases, thus

pre-intervention, intervention and post intervention.

Page 39: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

28

3.5.1 Pre – Intervention

A lot of preparatory activities necessary for effective implementation of the intervention were

done at this stage of the research. The researcher after identifying the problem needed to find

out more, collect data about the problem so as to know how best to tackle it. Hence, the

researcher used data collection techniques like questionnaires, observation, students‟ test

scores and interviews to achieve this. At this stage, the researcher used the traditional method

of delivering lessons to deliver all his lessons. Class exercises and assignments were given to

students which the researcher marked, scored and delivered to students promptly. A class test

was conducted at the end of the pre-intervention period. This too was marked, scored and

returned to students on time. The researcher used marks obtained from the class test as test

data for the pre-intervention period.

3.5.2 Intervention

The researcher decided to roll out his intervention strategy at the end of the pre-intervention

period. This was when the scores of the pre-intervention class test conducted did not meet the

expectation of the researcher. The intervention strategy was in the form of delivering lessons

with PowerPoint presentations. The PowerPoint presentations served as the primary mode of

delivery of lessons and also as a visual aid since a lot of visually stimulating illustrations and

effects were applied to the presentations.

The researcher took time to carefully design the slides of each lesson for presentation. Picture

illustrations for identifying features of software were illustriously animated to capture

students‟ attention. Also, video demonstrations were included in slides which showed how

specific tasks were performed. This particularly fascinated students which ensured that

maximum attention was paid by students.

Page 40: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

29

For maximum skill acquisition, the researcher presented an ordered list of steps which were

animated to students before showing videos of such processes. This was followed by the

researcher allowing few students to actually come to the laptop to practise what they had

observed. With the researcher‟s assistance, this was no challenge at all for students.

During this time, intermittent class exercises and assignments were given to students. These

were marked, scored and given out to students promptly. Also, the researcher conducted

another class test which was marked, graded and promptly given out to students to mark the

end of the intervention phase.

3.5.3 Post – Intervention

The post intervention phase is the period immediately after the intervention period. This is

where the result of the class test conducted at the end of the intervention stage was

considered. It was realized that after the intervention, the academic performance and general

attitude of students towards ICT had improved considerably. This is evident in the subsequent

chapter of this study.

3.6 Data Collection Procedures

Upon careful consideration the researcher resolved to use observation, questionnaires,

interview and test results to gather information. These instruments were appropriate because

they provided the needed data for proper investigation into the research problem. Below is a

discussion of how each of the data collection tools was used to collect the needed data.

Page 41: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

30

3.6.1 Observation

The nature of the research problem identified called for data collection in the natural setting.

This prompted the researcher to use observation technique to gather information. The

researcher observed the students both in class and out of class. This was to find out what

underlying factors made students to exhibit such low interest in the teaching and learning of

ICT. The researcher observed his students both overtly and covertly since at some points

students were aware of the researcher‟s presence while at other times too, students were

oblivious to any such activity.

3.6.2 Interview

The researcher conducted an interview into the research problem. The interview was mainly

unstructured and was meant for tutors who handled ICT. However, few students selected at

random were also interviewed. The researcher wrote down key information areas which

served to him as an interview guide. With such interview guide at hand for the researcher‟s

perusal, he conducted the interview using probing questions for further information

gathering.

3.6.3 Tests

Students‟ test was one of the principal data collection instruments. Result from such guided

the researcher during the pre intervention, intervention and post intervention stages of the

study. It was the only way the researcher could measure the progress or otherwise of the

students with respect to the effectiveness of the intervention. The researcher conducted tests

made up of relevant test items meant to measure the appropriate skill or knowledge at the end

of every topic. These tests were in three main forms thus class exercises, assignments and

Page 42: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

31

class tests. The class exercises and assignments were often given at the end of every lesson

whilst the class tests were conducted at the end of each topic.

3.6.4 Questionnaire

A questionnaire of 15 items comprising both open and close-ended questions was designed

for the study. It was pre-tested with a section of the population who were outside of the

sampled respondents for construction, content validity, wording format and questionnaire

flow. The pre-test resulted in rewording of a few of the questionnaire items. Also, specimen

questionnaires for both tutors and students were sent to the supervisor of this research. They

were edited and corrections were made. The questionnaire was administered in class by the

researcher himself. This was done to ensure that any misunderstanding was cleared and that

valid responses were given by the students.

3.7 Data Analysis

Descriptive approach was used to analyze the data. The data was then converted into tables

for easy analysis and presentation using Microsoft Office Excel. Each table was presented

using the number of respondents and their scores including percentages. These were later

converted into pie charts and bar graphs for visual interpretation.

Page 43: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

32

CHAPTER FOUR

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on pre-intervention results, post intervention results and discussion of

post-intervention results. The facts and figures gathered from the study are discussed and

presented using tables and diagrams.

4.2 Pre – Intervention Results

During the first few weeks of the term, the researcher observed the attitude of the students

towards teaching and learning of ICT. A questionnaire was also designed and administered to

the students to enable the researcher know how to implement a suitable intervention. The

following are the outcomes of the questionnaires presented to the students.

4.2.1 The Effect of Students’ Attitude towards the Teaching of ICT

The researcher in the early stages of the study observed the students to find out how their

indifference to the teaching and learning of ICT impacted their academic performance. Based

on the observation, it was found out that students generally have a poor attitude towards the

teaching and learning of ICT. The seriousness level of students which was evidenced by their

participation in lessons and the contributions they made during lessons was also generally

low. Students were also not motivated to learn the subject at all and stated the major reason as

the subject not being examinable at the external examinations. This made students attach very

little or no importance to the teaching and learning of ICT.

Page 44: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

33

The researcher also conducted a pre-test to ascertain whether students‟ performance matched

up with their attitudes and level of interest observed. The result of the pre-test was very poor

although it was not surprising to the researcher.

Table 4.1: Students‟ Performance on Pre-Test

Marks Frequency Percentage (%)

0 – 5 38 38%

6 – 10 46 46%

11 – 15 12 12%

16 – 20 4 4%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field Survey, 2013).

From Table 4.1 above, it is obvious that the performance of students during the pre-test at the

pre-intervention stage was far below average. This was because more than two-thirds

representing 84% of the students‟ score was below the pass mark of 11 and above. Only 16

students of the population made the pass mark of 11 and above.

4.2.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation

During the pre intervention stage, it became evident from the ICT tutors through informal

interview that none of them used PowerPoint presentations to deliver lessons. The researcher

then presented one of his lessons using PowerPoint presentation. He observed the students for

clues of increased interest and participation in the lesson. The questionnaire administered to

Page 45: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

34

respondents contained an item which sought to know whether students liked ICT lessons

presented with PowerPoint or not. Table 4.2 below shows the responses given by students in

respect of the use of PowerPoint.

Table 4.2 Students‟ preference for lessons presented with PowerPoint

Responses Frequency Percentage (%)

Yes

No

97

3

97%

3%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field Survey, 2013).

Table 4.2 shows that an overwhelming majority of 97% of students responded „Yes‟ to the

question of whether they liked lessons presented with PowerPoint. The students responded

„Yes‟ stating reasons like PowerPoint presentations made learning more interesting, it made

lessons easy to understand and it became easy for them to follow among others.

Three students however chose to differ and said they did not like lessons presented with

PowerPoint and stated reasons as the lesson delivery was faster and that it was difficult taking

notes on the lesson. From the above results, it was evident to the researcher that the

implementation of PowerPoint presentations as an intervention would yield the desired result.

4.2.3 Improving Students’ Performance in ICT using PowerPoint Presentations

When asked how PowerPoint presentations can be used effectively to improve students‟

performance in ICT, the views of both teachers and students were similar. This re-echoed the

Page 46: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

35

fact stated in the literature that teachers need to have the necessary soft skills required to

create visually appealing slides that integrate multimedia such as video and audio.

All the four teachers interviewed conceded that PowerPoint presentations had the potential to

improve students‟ performance and raise their interest level. On the question of how this

could be achieved, they said by designing interesting and attention catching slides which

would make learning fun and at the same time educative.

When asked whether multimedia content in PowerPoint presentations enhanced teaching and

learning, the following responses were given by the respondents:

Table 4.3 Response to whether multimedia content in PowerPoint presentations improved

teaching and learning

Responses Frequency Percentage (%)

Yes 100 100%

No 0 0%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field survey, 2013).

As presented in Table 4.3, 100% responded „Yes‟. This implied that when students see

multimedia content as video and audio, they get excited and pay maximum attention to the

lessons taught through the material.

Page 47: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

36

4.2.4 Visual Aids for Lecture and Discussion: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard

Pertaining to which visual aid complemented lecture and discussion method of teaching while

at the same time enabling students to retain more information the responses students provided

are presented in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4: The use of visual aids to retain more information

Response Frequency Percentage (%)

Blackboard 4 4%

Still pictures 8 14%

Illustrated diagrams 14 12%

PowerPoint presentations 51 51%

Video 21 21%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field Survey, 2013).

According to the data presented in Table 4.4, four respondents claimed the whiteboard helped

them retain more information while eight (8) respondents representing 8% of the population

said Still pictures helped them retain more information when used together with lecture and

discussion method of teaching. Also, 14% of students said illustrated diagrams helped them

retain more information. More than half of the students i.e. 51% opted for PowerPoint

presentation claiming it can be designed to include all other aspects of visuals (i.e.

multimedia) and 21 students also preferred video. This implies that when visually stimulating

content is presented to students, the information is retained more than when visual aids are

not used.

Page 48: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

37

4.3 Post Intervention Results

Post intervention presents the outcome of the intervention strategy implemented. At this stage

of the research, the researcher was only interested in evaluating the students‟ attitude and

performance towards the study of ICT. The intervention for this study was the use of

PowerPoint presentations to aid teaching and learning.

4.3.1 The Effect of Students’ Attitude towards Teaching on their Performance

After the implementation of the intervention strategy, the researcher observed students for a

change in attitude towards teaching and learning of ICT. It was noticed that students

participated more in class discussions. This indicated a turnaround from their previous

indifferent attitude towards the teaching and learning of ICT. To see whether this change in

attitude would reflect on their performance, a post – test was conducted. Table 4.7 below

presents the result of the post test conducted.

Table 4.5 Post Test Results

Marks Frequency Percentage (%)

0 – 5 0 0%

6 – 10 28 28%

11 – 15 53 53%

16 – 20 19 19%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field Survey, 2013).

Page 49: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

38

Table 4.5 shows students‟ performance from the test conducted after the implementation

stage. It shows clearly from the table that, 53% of the students scored between 11 and

15marks which were above the average mark. Also, 19% of the students scored between 16-

20 marks. It was also noticed that no student scored between 0 and 5 marks. The result

indicated a significant improvement in students‟ performance. This was achieved because,

the implementation of the intervention strategy made students change their attitude towards

ICT as a subject. Students were thus motivated and more interested in the learning of ICT

which translated into better performance.

4.3.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation to Boost Students’ Interest in ICT

Lessons

After the implementation of the intervention, students were observed to see whether there

will be a change in their interest level towards the teaching and learning of ICT. Through

observation, the interest level of students was scored as illustrated in the table below:

Table 4.6 Students‟ interest level after the intervention.

Interest Level Frequency Percentage (%)

Very interested 43 43%

Interested 52 52%

Not interested 5 5%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field Survey, 2013)

As is evident from Table 4.6, 52% of students were observed to be interested in the lesson

while 43% showed high interest in lessons presented with PowerPoint presentations. 5% of

Page 50: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

39

the students were however not interested. This shows that when PowerPoint presentation was

used students‟ interest in ICT was revived.

4.3.3 Improving Students’ Performance in ICT using PowerPoint Presentations

The results of the post – test conducted after the implementation of the intervention showed a

tremendous increase in the performance of students. This goes to affirm the fact that

PowerPoint presentations when used effectively (i.e. designed to meet all aspects of learning)

improved students‟ performance. It therefore establishes that when teachers use PowerPoint

presentations in delivering ICT lessons, it has a significant impact on the performance of

students.

4.3.4 Visual Aids for Lecture and Discussion: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard

The researcher was convinced of the fact that PowerPoint presentations played a bigger role

in helping students to learn more. This was attributable to the increase in the number of

respondents that opted for PowerPoint presentations when asked the same question after the

intervention. Because students perceived that PowerPoint was an appropriate visual aid

complementing the use of lecture and discussion method, they opted for it.

Page 51: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

40

Table 4.7 Which visual aid helps to retain more information

Response Frequency Percentage (%)

Blackboard 2 4%

Still pictures 4 14%

Illustrated diagrams 8 12%

PowerPoint presentations 67 51%

Video 19 21%

Total 100 100%

(Source: Field survey, 2013).

4.4 Discussion of Post Intervention Results

This section discusses the results obtained after the implementation of the intervention at the

post intervention stage.

4.4.1 Students’ Attitudes on Teaching Techniques and their Effect on Performance

As discussed under section 2.3.1, there is a strong correlation between students‟ attitude

towards teaching and learning and their academic performance or achievement. According to

Eagle and Chalkin (2008), changing one‟s attitude leads to a change in their behaviour. The

researcher observed from the results of post-test conducted that there was a significant

improvement in the general performance of students. This was attributed to the reason that

after the implementation of the intervention, students‟ attitude towards the teaching and

learning of ICT changed significantly. Students no longer showed low interest but rather

showed a sense of commitment to ICT as a subject.

Page 52: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

41

4.4.2 The Use of PowerPoint Presentation to Boost Students’ Interest in ICT

Lessons

According to Hoffman (2000), slide presentation software such as PowerPoint has become an

integral part of many instructional settings. This is particularly true in large classes. He

observed that PowerPoint can be a highly effective tool to aid learning, but if not used

carefully and correctly, it may instead disengage students and actually hinder learning.

From the results obtained after intervention through observation, students‟ interest levels

were boosted when PowerPoint presentations were used. This was evident from their

participation in class and their general performance.

4.4.3 Improving Students’ Performance in ICT using PowerPoint Presentations

As concluded by Hogarty, Lang and Kromrey (2003), the use of multimedia presentations

such as PowerPoint improves student learning and performance. Also, Gale and Robert

(2005) asserted that multimedia presentations can improve students‟ test scores significantly.

Consistent with the above authors, the use of PowerPoint as an intervention strategy proved

very important. Students‟ post - test scores were greatly improved over their pre-test scores

owing to the use of PowerPoint as a presentation method and also as a visual aid.

Page 53: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

42

Figure 4.1: Students‟ pre-test and post-test scores.

(Source: Author‟s Construct, 2013)

4.4.4 Visual Aids for Lecture and Discussion: PowerPoint versus Whiteboard

Maddux & Aberasturi (2008) observed in their study that the method of material presentation

does affect students‟ retention of the information presented. This brought PowerPoint

presentations to the fore as it had many advantages over its other counterpart visual aids. In

consonance with the above observation, the researcher observed that PowerPoint as compared

to the whiteboard as a visual aid enabled students to retain more information with regards to

the lesson taught. This consequently resulted in the increase in students‟ interest levels when

PowerPoint presentations were used and also performance wise when tests were conducted.

It can be concluded from the above evidences that PowerPoint as a method of presentation

and a visual aid has many advantages. These range from increasing students interest in the

lesson, improving performance of students on tests and also changing the discouraging

attitudes of students.

38

46

12

40

28

53

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20

No

. of

stu

de

nts

in p

erc

en

tage

Mark Range

Pre - Test

Post - Test

Page 54: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

43

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Introduction

Innovative teaching techniques do not only arouse students‟ interest in the subject of ICT but

also help to improve students‟ academic performance significantly. The chapter provides a

summary of findings, conclusion and give recommendations and suggestions to other

researchers who wish to conduct further studies in similar areas.

5.2 Summary of Findings

This study was conducted at Nkawie Senior High Technical School, in the Atwima

Nwabiagya District in the Ashanti Region. It was observed during the early stages of the

study that due to inhibiting situations like lack of infrastructure and facilities on the ground,

most ICT teachers at Nkawie Senior High School use lecture and discussion methods to teach

lessons which otherwise should be practical and demonstration oriented. The study compared

and measured the effectiveness of computer-based PowerPoint and the traditional whiteboard

as a visual stimulant.

The study revealed as a result of the implementation of the intervention that:

1. The use of PowerPoint presentations greatly improved the academic performance of

students in ICT. An evidence of this is students‟ post-test results being a significant

improvement over their pre-test results.

2. Students no longer capitulate but rather show great interest in class when PowerPoint was

used to present lessons. Students showed their interest in lessons by making more

contributions the lesson and asking relevant questions.

Page 55: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

44

3. Using PowerPoint as a visual aid to lessons reached the different kinds of learners due to

its utilization of multimedia content.

5.3 Conclusion

It became evident from the study that using a variety of teaching techniques and

implementing visual aids can influence students‟ performance positively in more than one

way. Before the intervention, the attitude of students towards ICT as a subject generally was

poor. This was due to inappropriate teaching methods employed by teachers. Also, students

were not encouraged to take the subject serious because it was not examinable.

5.4 Recommendations

From the findings and conclusion made from the study, the following recommendations have

been made:

i. Teachers should vary their teaching methods to include the use of visual aids. Because

there are individual differences among students, one teaching technique may not appeal to

all students. Teachers therefore should employ more than one teaching method in order to

engage all kinds of learners in the school system.

ii. Policy makers (Educational Planners and Administrators) should make ICT examinable in

the external examinations. This is necessary to motivate students to pay serious attention

to the subject.

Page 56: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

45

iii. Visual aids such as PowerPoint presentations that include multimedia (i.e. audio, video,

animations) should be incorporated in lessons to boost students‟ interest levels and

capture their attention.

iv. School authorities should provide the enabling technologies like Projectors and projector

screens, computer laboratories and the likes to enable teachers use multimedia to appeal

to the senses of students while at the same time actively engaging them in learning.

5.5 Suggestions for Further Research

The following guidelines suggested will be very useful for other researchers who wish to

embark on similar researches on the topic:

Studies must be done in the area of using PowerPoint effectively (slide design and

presentation) to maximise students‟ performance.

A study can be done on the use of multimedia and appropriate technologies to impact

students‟ retention and internalisation of taught information.

A similar study can be undertaken in a different part of the nation with a larger sample.

Exploration into the possibility of other software aside PowerPoint (such as tutorials) to

capture students‟ interest, attention and improve performance in ICT.

Page 57: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

46

REFERENCES

Amoani, F. K. (2005). Introduction to Research Methodology. Winneba: University of

Education.

Anderman, E. M. & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades.

Review of Educational Research Journal, 64, 287-309.

Barbe, W. B., Swassing, R. H., & Milone, M. N., Jr. (1979). Teaching through modality

strengths: Concepts and practices. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.

Beets, S. D., & Lobingier, P. G. (2001). Pedagogical techniques: Student performance

and preferences. Journal of Education for Business, 76(4), 231-235.

Bolliger, D. U. (2003). Investigating student learning in a constructivist Multimedia - rich

learning environment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for

Educational Communications and Technology 27th

, Chicago, IL.

Brown, S. (1996) Motivating students. London: Kogan Page Limited.

Chiodo, J. J., & Byford, J. (2004). Do they really dislike social studies? A study of middle

school and high school students. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 16-26.

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational

Research, 445-459.

Daniels, L. (1999), “Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as a first step”,

Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10, 42–56.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545

Dils, A. K. (2000). Using technology in a middle school computer classroom.

International Journal of Social Education, 15(1), 102-112.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning

styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Page 58: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

47

Frey, B. A., & Birnbaum, D. J. (2002). Learners‟ perceptions on the value of PowerPoint in

lectures. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh. (ERIC Document Reproduction

Services No. ED 467 192).

Goldberg, B., & Richards, J. (1995). Leveraging technology for reform: Changing schools

and communities into learning organizations. Educational Technology, 5, 16.

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. (1993). Instructional Media: And the new

technologies of instruction. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Henderson, J., Winitzky, N., & Kauchak, D. (1996). Effective teaching in advanced

placement classrooms. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 31, 29-35.

Hendricks, C. (2009). Improving schools through action research. A comprehensive guide for

educators. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Hendrix, J. C. (1999). Connecting cooperative learning and social studies. The Clearing

House, 73(1), 57-60.

Hogarty, Kristine Y., Thomas R. Lang, and Jeffrey D. Kromrey. (2004). “Another look at

technology use in classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to

measure teachers‟ perceptions.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 63:

139-162.

Johnson, B. (2007). The student-centered classroom handbook: A guide to implementation.

(1). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.

Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 179-211.

Laney, J. D. (1999). A sample lesson in economics for primary students: how cooperative and

mastery learning can enhance social studies teaching. The Social Studies, 90(4), 152-

159.

Page 59: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

48

Larson, T. D. (2001). A comparison of fifth grade children receiving both a traditional and a

technology based means of instruction in social studies. Unpublished master‟s thesis,

Johnson Bible College, Tennessee.

Lowry, R. B. (1999). Electronic presentation of lecture – effect upon student performance.

University Chemistry Education, 3(1), 18-21.

Maddux, C., & Aberasturi, S. (2008). The effect of presentation software on classroom verbal

interaction on student retention of higher education lecture content. International

Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 21–33.

Mayer, R. E., (1996). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections

between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 84(4), 444-452.

Miller, P. (2001). Learning styles: The multimedia of the mind. ED 451340.

Ministry of Education. (2007). Report of the president’s committee on review of education

reforms in Ghana (Anamuah-Mensah Report), Accra: Ghana.

Namathaka, L., Kalulu, M., Malisawa, A., Mhoni, S., Kabuwe, E., Kasitomu, H., et al.

(2000). Teacher training resource handbook: innovative approach teaching and

learning. Washington, DC: Agency for International Development.

Nouri H. and Szanti. A. (2005). “The effect of PowerPoint presentations on student learning

and attitudes”, Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 53-73.

Pennell, M. L. (2000). Improving student participation in history lectures. Teaching History,

25(1), 25-35.

Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students‟ motivation and

quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school

environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341-371.

Page 60: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

49

Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in

adolescents‟ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Research

Journal, 38(2), 437-461.

Shrock, A. A., & Shrock R. (1994). Engaging the past. The Journal of American History,

81(3), 1093-1098.

Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice Prentice Hall,

Englewood Cliffs, NJ,

Stone, L. L. (1999). Multimedia instruction methods. The Journal of Economic Education,

30(3), 265-275.

Sultan, A., & Jones, M. (1995). The effects of computer visual appeal on learners motivation.

In eyes on the future: Converging images, ideas, and instruction. Annual Conference

of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 95-100). Chicago, IL.

Wilson, V. A. (1998). Learning how they learn: A review of the literature on learning styles.

U. S. Department of Education, Educational Resource Information Center.

Yang, Y. (1991). The effects of media on motivation and content recall: Comparison of

computer-and-print based instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,

20(2), 95-105.

Page 61: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

50

APPENDIX A

QUESTIONNAIRE TO INVESTIGATE THE CAUSE OF LOW INTEREST IN ICT

AMONG FORM TWO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Please read, think carefully and provide the appropriate responses to the questions below by

ticking [√] in the space provided. Any information provided is solely for academic purposes

only and absolute confidentiality is assured.

Case Study: Nkawie Senior High School [Technical]

1. Gender:

Male [ ]

Female [ ]

2. Age (in years)

13-15 [ ]

16-18 [ ]

19 and above [ ]

3. a) Do you enjoy ICT lessons?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

b) If Yes in (a) above, why?

It is interesting [ ]

It is easy to understand [ ]

It offers more job opportunities after school [ ]

c) If No in (a) above, why?

It is boring [ ]

Page 62: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

51

It is difficult to understand [ ]

I don‟t see its importance to me after school [ ]

4. ICT is as important as other subjects.

Strongly agree [ ]

Agree [ ]

Not Sure [ ]

Disagree [ ]

Strongly Disagree [ ]

5. What teaching method does your ICT teacher use to teach you?

Lecture [ ]

Discussion [ ]

Demonstration [ ]

Lecture and discussion [ ]

Lecture and demonstration [ ]

6. Does your teacher use visual aids to enhance teaching and learning of ICT?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

7. If Yes in (7), which visual aid does he use?

Still pictures [ ]

Illustrated diagrams [ ]

PowerPoint presentations [ ]

Video [ ]

8. Which visual aid helps you to retain more information?

Still pictures [ ]

Illustrated diagrams [ ]

Page 63: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

52

PowerPoint presentations [ ]

Video [ ]

Blackboard [ ]

9. a) Do you like ICT lessons presented with PowerPoint?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

b) If Yes in (a) above, why?

Learning is more interesting [ ]

Easy to understand [ ]

Easy to follow [ ]

Easy to discuss [ ]

c) If No in (a) above, why?

Faster Presentation [ ]

Note taking is more difficult [ ]

Teacher talks more making it boring [ ]

Less motivation [ ]

10. When multimedia content (i.e. video, audio, etc) are included in PowerPoint

presentations, does it enhance teaching and learning?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Page 64: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

53

APPENDIX B

INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR ICT TUTORS

1. Sex:……………………………………………….

2. How long have you been teaching ICT?

3. What is the relationship between you and your students?

A. Cordial B. Very Cordial C. Fair D. Poor

4. Which teaching method do you use?

A. Lecture B. Demonstration C. Discussion D. Lecture & Demonstration

5. Briefly explain the reason for your choice in (4) above.

6. Which teaching aid do you use during ICT lessons?

7. What in your perspective are the causes of students‟ poor performance in ICT

8. What problems do you face in teaching ICT?

9. Suggest possible solutions to the problems listed above.

10. What is the attitude of students towards the teaching and learning of ICT?

11. To what extent does students‟ attitude affect their performance?

12. Do you think PowerPoint presentations can effectively improve students‟

performance in ICT?

13. If Yes, how?

14. If No, why?

Page 65: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

54

APPENDIX C

OBSERVATION GUIDE FOR STUDENTS

1. The attitude of students towards the teaching and learning of ICT (Evidenced by their

participation in lessons, attendance to lessons and performance).

2. Seriousness level of students

3. Participation level of students

4. Eagerness to learn (asking questions)

5. The performance in class exercises and assignments.

6. Are students motivated to learn ICT at all?

7. The level of importance they attach to ICT as a subject.

Page 66: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

55

APPENDIX D

PRE – TEST

NKAWIE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (TECHNICAL)

FIRST CLASS TEST – ICT

NAME:………………………………………………………… CLASS:…………………

Answer all Questions

Fill in the blank spaces with the correct answers

1. The internet is a/an

……………………….. that connects

computers worldwide through

telecommunication links and satellites.

2. A ……………….. converts digital

signals from the computer to analogue

signals and vice versa for transmission

over telephone lines.

3. ……………………is the protocol that

helps to transmit hypertext documents

over the internet.

4. A website‟s direct address is also known

as ………………………………………

5. The general name for documents that

contain links to other documents, text,

graphics, sound and video files is

…………………………….

6. ………………………..is the unique

address that identifies every computer or

device connected to the internet.

7. …………………is a form of

communication on the internet that

involves the sending and receiving of

instant messages between people who are

online.

8. One of the advantages of the internet is

that, every information that it provides is

accurate and correct. True/False.

9. …………….is a software that helps us to

navigate or view webpages on the web.

10. The set of rules that control how

computers communicate with one another

in a network is called

………………………..

Page 67: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

56

Multiple choice questions

11. The protocol that breaks data up into

packets for easy transmission on a

network is known as

A. FTP

B. TCP

C. IP

D. HTTP

12. Which of the following is not a

browser?

A. Google

B. Microsoft Internet Explorer

C. Safari

D. Mozilla Firefox

13. Which of the following is used to

create web pages?

A. HTML

B. FTP

C. HTTP

D. TCP/IP

14. ICT is the abbreviated form for …….

A. Information Communications and

Technology

B. Information and Communication

Technology

C. Information Communication

Technology

D. Information and Communications

Technology

15. All the following are needed for

internet connectivity except

A. Browser

B. URL

C. Laptop

D. Modem

Identify the following features of a typical web browser

C

A

B

D

E

Page 68: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

57

16. The feature labelled A is called the

A. Status bar

B. Address bar

C. Title bar

D. Menu bar

E. Main window

17. The feature labelled E is called the

A. Status bar

B. Address bar

C. Title bar

D. Menu bar

E. Main window

18. The feature labelled B is called the

A. Status bar

B. Address bar

C. Title bar

D. Menu bar

E. Main window

19. The feature labelled D is called the

A. Status bar

B. Address bar

C. Title bar

D. Menu bar

E. Main window

20. The feature labelled C is called the

A. Status bar

B. Address bar

C. Title bar

D. Menu bar

E. Main window

Page 69: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

58

APPENDIX E

POST – TEST

NKAWIE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (TECHNICAL) END OF TERM CLASS TEST – ICT

NAME:……………………………………………………… CLASS:…………………

1. Which of the following is a web

browser?

A. Microsoft XP

B. Microsoft internet

C. Microsoft internet explorer

D. Internet drive

2. The acronym WWW stands for

A. World wide waves

B. World wide web

C. Word wide width

D. World wide wed

3. The standard that allows computers to be

connected on a network is called?

A. Protocol

B. Packets

C. Browser

D. FTP

4. An unsolicited E-mail message is called

A. Blog

B. Spam

C. Mailing list

D. MSN

5. Which of these is not an e-mail service

provider?

A. Yahoo

B. Skype

C. Gmail

D. Hotmail

6. One of the following displays the address

of the page visited.

A. Search button

B. History button

C. Address bar

D. Menu bar

7. Which of the following is not a browser?

E. Google

F. Microsoft Internet Explorer

G. Safari

H. Mozilla Firefox

8. Which of the following tabs would you

find the page size command in Microsoft

Office Word?

A. Home tab

B. Insert tab

C. Layout tab

D. Page Layout tab

9. To add page numbers to your document,

which group will you go under the Insert

tab?

A. Pages group

B. Tables group

C. Illustrations group

D. Header & Footer group

10. In the home tab, where will you find the

command for adding bullets and

numbers to your document?

A. Clipboard

B. Font

C. Paragraph

D. Editing

Page 70: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

59

Section B

Answer any two questions from this section

1. Define the following terms

i. Internet

ii. Website

iii. E-mail

iv. IP address

v. Modem

2. A) List down items you will need when setting up an internet connection at home.

B) Mention five features of Microsoft word and explain 2 of them.

3. Write down the shortcuts of the following MS Word commands.

i. Paste

ii. Cut

iii. Copy

iv. Underline

v. Save

vi. Print

vii. Left align

viii. Centre align

ix. Bold

x. Italic

4. A) Write down the steps in launching Microsoft Office Word.

B) How would you change the page size of a document from Letter to A4 size?

Page 71: Gersh - Action Research.pdf

60

APPENDIX F

RESEARCHER’S INTERNSHIP ASSURANCE LETTER