genesis of lok adalat
DESCRIPTION
lok adalat workingTRANSCRIPT
Lok Adalat
Genesis of Lok Adalat
Introduction
The history of the evolution of Lok Adalats,
popularly known as people’s court goes back to Vedic times when
the kings, in return for taxes paid to him by the people performed
the duty of judge. The Vedic king wielded authority as the head of
the judiciary and claimed himself as the upholder of Dharma of
law like Varma. The judicial powers of the king swallowed with
the passage of time and the machinery for the administration of
justice put into by him consisted by Sabha and Samiti. The study
of Dharmasutras discloses that king started delegating his judicial
authority to his royal officers who were the member of village
assembly known as the Sabha. The most pronounced feature of
Hindu policy was that the law was administered by the Sabha.
Normally it was the Sabha or the popular village assembly rather
than the king who tried to arbitrate when it was feasible to do so.
There is substantial corroboration of the fact that in the later vedic
times Samhitas and Brahmanas of the old Vedic tribal council
called the sabha developed into the king’s court as well as his
council.
1
Lok Adalat
There were functioning two seats of courts
simultaneously, viz the royal court and popular court i.e lok
Adalat. With the expansion of royel powers after 600 B.C
subordinate royal courts began to be constituted for important
towns and cities which were often located in the headquarters of
terriritorial division like Sthana. Dronamukha and Kharvatika.
These courts functioned under the authority of royal seal and were
popularly known as Mudrita in later times. Similarly, there were
special Royal courts of criminal jurisdiction known as
Kantakasodhana courts. In addition to these royal courts, there
were no. of popular courts in the ancient Indian polity. Though the
ancient Indian polity was a highly centralized one but it left a
number of disputes to be decided by unofficial courts.
GRADATION AND COMPOSITION OF PEOPLE’S
COURTS
To reiterate, the lok Adalats i.e., popular courts or
people’s courts are for the first instance mentioned in Yajnavalkya
Smriti. He mentions three types of popular courts, viz. (a) Puga,
(b) Sreni, and (c) kula. Similarly, P.V. Kane is of the view that
Puga, Sreni, and kula were arbitration tribunals like modern
Panchayats or the lok Adalats of today. The judges of the popular
courts had office either by election or by inheritance according to
2
Lok Adalat
local custom. There was a well established hierarchy of the popular
courts, the highest being the court of Gana and the lowest on the
ladder was the Kula court. The Sreni court was in between the two.
These same courts are mentioned in the same order by Brihaspati
who points out that an appeal would lie to the Sreni court from the
decision of Kula court and to the Puga court from the decision of
the Sreni court.
The word Puga appears to have denoted the
local corporations of towns are villages during the post-vedic
period. The study of chullavaga discloses that the word Puga has
been used to have a sense of corporation of a town or a village.
Yajnavalkya opines that the Puga court consisted of member
belonging to different castes and profession but staying in the same
villages or town. Puga courts functioned as an agency of
adjudication other than official ones. One find a detail description
about the nature and composition of the Puga courts in the
philosophy of Altekar. He was of the view that Puga courts
consisted of members belonging to different caste and profession
and staying in the same villages or town. It is thus clear that Puga
courts played an important role almost throughout the long course
of Indian history. Though Puga courts were non official, they had
the royal authority behind them since they were sanctioned by the
3
Lok Adalat
king. Puga courts also enjoyed a appellate jurisdiction in all cases
decided by Sreni and kula court.
The Sreni was an association of persons engaged in
similar pursuits. It was an association or a corporation of
merchants or guilds. The Dharmasastra and Nitisastra shows that
Sreni courts had jurisdiction to resolve disputes among their
members. The Sreni had their own executive committees of four or
five members and it was likely that these committees functioned as
the Sreni court when the efforts at family arbitration failed.
Vijnansesvara describes Sreni as agencies of adjudication other
than official ones. The Sreni courts had appellate jurisdiction the
appeal could lie against the decision of Kula courts in the Sreni
courts.
Kula was the lowest court, headed by the kirismen.
Mitaksara defines Kula as a group of relative. The Kula court was
informed body of family elders. It enjoyed the judicial function but
was considered to be inferior in jurisdiction to officers appointed
by the king. It was an arbitration tribunal like modern panchayat or
the lok Adalats of today.
POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF LOK ADALATS
The hindu scriptures throw a flood of light on the powers
nad functions of the popular court prevelant in ancient India. The
4
Lok Adalat
authoritative sources disclosed that these courts had the authority
to decide civil and criminal cases accept those involing trail for an
offence committed with violence i.e Sahasna. They had no
authority to administer sentences of fines and corporal punishment.
The matter of this nature had to go before the king, who alone had
the power to execute such sentences if it met with his approval.
Besides, sahasna matters, the popular courts were almost
autonomous in their powers of investigation and the decision of the
disputes in their own jurisdiction. Narada has gone to extent of
declaring people’s courts independent in their affair equal to a
king.
The king of the country happens to be upper most and
supreme court for civil and criminal cases in his kingdom. In case
of grave crimes or when the condemned party refuse to obey the
judgment of local court, the court of king was concerned with
litigation.
Though the popular court where essentially non official,
they had still the royal authority behind them nad were sanctioned
by the king. The decision s of these courts were authoritative in
nature and the government was bound to execute their decrees
because the state had delegated these powers to them. The govt.
had a considered policy that these popular courts should flourish, it
refuse to entertain any suit accept in appeal against their decisions.
5
Lok Adalat
The people’s courts were empowered to impose fines or
awards imprisonment, banishment depending in the nature of cases
decides by them. Fines, mutilation and death sentence were in
vogue. Fines were most common. Those sentenced to
imprisonment were often made to work on roads and in public
places, so that there should be a deterant effect. In early times the
punishment for the murder of a Brahmana was a thousand cows,
for that of a Kshatriya five hundred cows, for that for Vaisya
hundred cows and for that of a sudra only ten cows.
JUDICAIL PROCEDURE OF THE POPULAR COURTS
The whole judicial proceeding was devided into four
main heads.
1 The plaint ( Bhasa Pada or Pratijna)
2 The reply ( or written statement )
3 The proof ( or evidence on behalf of the plaintiff and the
defendant i.e Kriya Pada or Sadhna )
4 The decision (or judgment) ( Nirnaya )
6
Lok Adalat
Concept of Alternative Dispute Resolution Vis-à-
vis Lok Adalat
INTRODUCTION
In the present set up of democracy in India equal justice for all is a
cardinal principle on which entire system of administration justice
is based. It is so deep rooted in the body and spirit of common
spirit of common law as well as civil law Jurisprudence that the
very meaning which we ascribe to the word “Justice” embraces it.
We cannot conceive of justice which is not fair and equal, which is
given to one and denied to another. In democracy, Judiciary in one
of the organs of the State and without it, democracy cannot be
successful. The Public confidence in the Courts depends on the
efficiency and integrity of the Judiciary. In our country where
People consider the Judges only second to God, efforts to be made
strengthen that belief of the common men. It now widely
acknowledge that ‘Justice delayed is Justice denied’. It is of
common knowledge that existing Justice system is not able to cope
up with the increasing burden of cases. It is often said that our
Judiciary has come under great stress and is crumbling under its
own weight. The deficiency lies in that adversarial nature of
Judicial Process which is time consuming and more often Proce-
dure oriented. In a rapidly developing society human needs are
7
Lok Adalat
bound to multiply resulting in conflict of interest people became
more conscious about their rights and litigation becomes an
inevitable part of their life due to rising incidence of dispute
among them. Judicial mechanism finds it difficult to cope up with
the enormous case load. We have no other choice but to
immediately device effective. Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mechanism (ADRM) to ease the present burden of Judicial
functioning. The settlement of disputes outside the scope of the
formal legal system may be called an alternative means of
settlement of dispute. The Primary object of ADRM is to provide
cheap Simple quick and effective remedy. In ADR process the
disputes are settled with the assistance of a neutral third person.
The emergency of alternative dispute resolution has been one of
the most significant movements as a part of conflict management
and judicial reform, and it has become a global necessity.
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 laid down the
minimum standards, which are required for an effective ADRM.
Further the amendment of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 will
give a boost to ADR Section 89 (1) of CPC now deals with the
settlement of disputes outside the Court Lok Adalit has also been
proved to the very effective ADR.
HISTORICAL BACK GROUND OF ADR AND LOK
ADALAT
8
Lok Adalat
There is considerable evidence was ADR was widely used in
ancient India. The history of the evolution of Lok Adalats, popu-
larly known as people's Court, goes back to vedic times when the
king in return for taxes paid to him by the people performed the
duty of a Judge.1 The Vedic king wielded authority as the head of
the Judiciary and claimed himself as the upholder of dharma of law
like Varuna2 Dharmasutras discloses that king started delegated his
judicial authority to his royal officers who were the members of
village assembly known as the sabah3. The most pronounced
feature of Hindu polity was that the law was administered by the
Sabha normally it was the Sabha or popular village assembly rather
than the king who ride to arbitrate when it was feasible to do so.4
There were functioning two seats of courts simultaneously, viz.,
the Royal Courts and popular courts i.e., Lok Adalat5. We find
mentioning of popular courts for the first instance in Yajnavalkya
smiriti. He Mention three types of popular Courts viz. (a) puga (b)
sreni and (c) Kula.6
Puga (Neighbouhood assemblies) srenis (guilds of a particular
occupation) and Kula arbitration tribunals like modern panchayats
or the Lok Adalats of Today. There were Nyay Panchayats at 1 Birender Nath , judicial administration in ancient India (1979) P-272 Rigveda IV 43 : VII 89.53 R.C.Majumdar the history and culture of the Indian people :The Vedic age (1965) Vol. 1.P.4944 Parmatama Saran , ancient India political thought (1982) p.4785 Parmatama Saran , ancient India political thought (1982) p.471
6 A.S.Atlekar of cit . P.246
9
Lok Adalat
grass-roots level before the advent of the British system of Justice.
Even in day-to day affairs in respect of some categories of disputes
ADR procedure of sorts are invoked without fanfare and
something without conscious thought, e. g. disputes within the
family, between friends and between neighbor’s disputes involving
employers and employees, etc.7There was provision for arbitration
in the code of civil Procedure. Such alternatives means of dispute
redressal system was recognized by the presidency Courts i.e.
Calcutta, Bombay and Madras.
Firstly the Arbitration Act, 1889, was enacted, which was modeled
on the basis of the British Arbitration Act, 1889. The Arbitration
Act, 1899 was substituted by the Arbitration Act, 1940.
However, certain provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1899 and
schedule of the code of civil procedure 1908 had have been
incorporated in the Arbitration Act, 1940. This act of 1940 dealt
with the domestic arbitration. This act for the first time provided
for a uniform law arbitration throughout India. The ac of 1940 has
been replaced by the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966. The
Govt. of India decided to repeal the arbitration Act 1940 and
replace it by a modern and efficient arbitration system. Thus the
arbitration and conciliation Bill, 1995 was firstly introduced in the
Rajya Sabha on 16th May 1995.
7P.V Kane , History of Dharamsutras
10
Lok Adalat
After undergoing the entire procedure the bill was finally passed
on 22nd July 1996 and by the Lok Sabha on 2nd August 1996. The
Act of 1996 received the assent of the President on 16 th August
1996.and came into force on 22nd August 1996. Since the amended
Section 89 and order X (IA) of the code, through was introduced in
1999, due to wide spread opposition to the amendment from the
practicing bar, it came into force from July 2002.
The New Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 based on
UNCITRAL model Law proposals of the Geneva Convention,
New York Convention and the Act, 1996 also contain certain
provisions of the Arbitration Act 1940. In present Act, domestic
arbitration besides conciliation have been recognized with the view
to settle the domestic and international commercial disputes by the
alternatives means of dispute resolution.
Litigation does not always lead to satisfactory results. It is
expensive in terms of time and money. A case won or lost in a
Court of law does not change the attitude the litigants who
continue to be adversaries and go on fighting in appeals after
appeals ADR system enables to change the approach of the parties.
Hence, ADR is becoming very popular in India.
Need for ADR
ADR refers to all those methods of resolving a dispute which are
alternatives for litigation in the courts. With the evolution of
11
Lok Adalat
modern states and sophisticated legal mechanism, the courts run on
very formal process and are presided over by trained adjudicators
entrusted with the responsibilities of resolution of disputes on the
part of the state. The seekers of the justice approach the courts of
Justice. 8 They do not take the law into their own hands as they
believe that hey would get Justice from the courts. It is the
obligation of Judiciary to deliver quick and inexpensive justice
shorn of the complexities of procedure. 8However the reality is that
it
takes a very long time to get justice through the establishedcourts
system. Obviously this leads to a search for alternative
complementary and supplementary mechanism to the process of
the traditional civil court for inexpensive, expeditious and less
cumbersome and also less stressful resolution of disputes. ADR
which provided procedural flexibility saved time and money and
avoided stress of a conventional trail. This system effectively
reduces the work load of the court.
ADR process is consensual and voluntary processes, which are
chosen by the parties to the dispute. These processes are
expeditious. ADR process is flexible which is handled and
resolved through an ADR agreement. They have been employed
with very encouraging results in several categories of disputes;
8 Rusel on Arbitration 20th Ed . P.1
12
Lok Adalat
especially civil, commercial, industrial and family disputes. ADR
offers the best solution in respect of commercial disputes of an
international character.
ADR has become a global necessity. In recent times, methods of
alternative dispute resolution have emerged as one of the most
significant movement and judicial reform. Many more alternatives
to the litigation have emerged. ADR is now an integral part of
modern legal system.
Methods of ADR
ADR is the major alternative of Court litigation. There are
different ADR mechanisms exist for resolving disputes outside the
courts. The choices of ADR method largely depends on the nature
of the dispute and relation to the parties. The main methods of
ADR are negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration,
consumer forums, judicial settlement, Lok Adalat.
Out of the ADR methods which are being used arbitration and
conciliation and Lok Adalat also a have received legislative
recognition. A brief description of various ADR methods used as
follows:-
1. Negotiation- Negotiation is a non binding procedure in which
discussions between the parties are initiated without the
intervention of third party with the object of arriving at a
13
Lok Adalat
negotiated settlement of dispute. Thus, negotiation provides
quicker and effective remedy thereby safeguarding the
privacy of the parties.
2. Conciliation and Mediation- Conciliation is a non-binding
procedure in which an impartial third party, the conciliator
assist the parties to a dispute in reaching a mutually agreed
settlement of the dispute conciliation is often held to be a
contractive approach which are justifiable in nature. A
conciliator himself draws up the terms of an agreement for
settlement after having detailed discussion with the parties to
the dispute. Generally conciliation is made through a
conciliator or conciliation committee. Conciliation help the
parties to a dispute reach an amicable settlement.
Mediation- Mediation involves act of a neutral third party to
facilitate the settlement of dispute between the two
contending parties. A mediator is usually take to be a person
accepted by the disputants themselves and his role is to help
them, he tries to persuade the parties to reach a compromise.
He may see each party privately and listen to its view point
and impress upon each party to understand the new point of
each party. His main function is to bring each parties together
so that they can arrive at an agreement solution to the
dispute.
14
Lok Adalat
3. Arbitration- Arbitration is a procedure in which the dispute is
submitted to an arbitral tribunal which makes a decision (ari
award) on the dispute that is binding on the parties. The
main objects of arbitration are speed, economy, convenience
and simplicity of procedures.
Under section 1 of the Encyclopedia of the laws of England,
the term arbitration means settlement of a dispute by the
decision not a regular and ordinary Court of Law but one or
more persons who are called arbitrators. The essence of
arbitration is that some dispute is referred to y the parties for
settlement to a tribunal of their own choice instead of Court.
Lok Adalat
The Indian legal system has evolved a new technique of alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) which is popularly known as Lok Adalat
System. Lok Adalat is a old concept. The roots of Lok Adalat can
be traced back to vedic times the period of Kautilya. Gautma,
Brihaspati and Yajnavalkya. These were then known as peoples
Courts. Kula Court, resolution mechanism is gaining favours. Lok
Adalats have gained popularity as peoples Courts The institution of
Lok Adalat in India, as the very name suggests, means people’s
Court . “Lok” Stands for “People” and the vernacular meaning of
the term “Adalat” is the Court. This system is based on Gandhian
principles. It one of the components of ADR system. As the Indian
15
Lok Adalat
Court are overburdened with the back log of cases and the regular
Courts are to decide the cases involve lengthy expensive and
tedious procedure. The Court take years together to settle even
petty cases. Lok Adalat, therefore provides alternative resolution
or devise for expedious and inexpensive Justice at the very door
steps of the people. Experiment of Lok Adalat as an alternatives
mode of dispute settlement has come to be accepted in India as a
viable, economic, efficient and informal one. This programme has
become very popular both in the rural as well as urban areas.
The ancient concept of settlement of dispute through mediation,
negotiation or through arbitral process known as “people” Court
verdict or decision of “Nyay Panch” is conceptualized and
institutionalized in the philosophy of Lok Adalat. Some people
equate Lok adalat to conciliation or mediation some treat it with
negotiations and arbitration. Those who find it different from all
these, call it “people’s Court”. It involves people who are directly
or indirectly affected by dispute resolution. The salient feature of
this form of dispute resolution are participation, accommodation,
fairness, expectation, voluntariness, neighbourliness, transparency,
efficiency and lack of animosity.
Lok Adalat owes its origin to the constitutional acceptance of legal
aid under Article 39-A (Part IV). It was inserted by 42nd
Amendment Act 1976 which provide for “ equal justice and free
16
Lok Adalat
legal aid by suitable legislation or scheme or in any other way to
ensure that opportunities for securing Justice are not denied to any
citizen by reasons of economy or other disabilities”. But even
thereafter it took more than a decade that the legal Services
Authority Act 1987 was enacted and enforced. It may be
considered work of great relief to the litigant public in the country.
Lok Adalak have worked very well and satisfactory in our country.
The Lok Adalat movement initially started in Gujarat in March,
1982 and now it has been extended throughout the country. The
first Lok Adalat was held on March 14, 1982 at Junagarh in
Gujarat- the land of Mahatama Gandhi. Lok Adalats have been
very successful in settlements of disputes- particularly motor
accident claims cases matrimonial/ family disputes, labour disputes
relating to public services such as an telephone electricity bank
recovery and also in criminal cases so on.Lok Adalat (people’s
courts), established by the government settles dispute through
conciliation and compromise. The First Lok Adalat was held in
Chennai in 1986. Lok Adalat accepts the cases which could be
settled by conciliation and compromise, and pending in the regular
courts within their jurisdiction.
The Lok Adalat is presided over by a sitting or retired judicial
officer as the chairman, with two other members, usually a lawyer
17
Lok Adalat
and a social worker. There is no court fee. If the case is already
filed in the regular court, the fee paid will be refunded if the
dispute is settled at the Lok Adalat. The procedural laws, and the
Evidence Act are not strictly followed while assessing the merits of
the claim by the Lok Adalat.
Main condition of the Lok Adalat is that both parties in dispute
should agree for settlement. The decision of the Lok Adalat is
binding on the parties to the dispute and its order is capable of
execution through legal process. No appeal lies against the order
of the lok adalat
Lok Adalat is very effective in settlement of money claims.
Disputes like partition suits, damages and matrimonial cases can
also be easily settled before Lok Adalat as the scope for
compromise through an approach of give and take is high in these
cases.
Lok Adalat is a boon to the litigant public, where they can get their
disputes settled fast and free of cost.
18
Lok Adalat
WHAT IS LOK ADALAT?
1. It is a judicial institution developed by the people themselves
for social justice.
2. It settles litigation by negotiation, arbitration or conciliation.
3. It is a dispute settlement agency.
4. Lok Adalats are not alternative to the existing courts. They are
only supplementary to the courts.
19
Lok Adalat
WHY LOK ADALATS?
1. Judicial justice is much despised in our country by the common
man because of the ruinous cost of litigation, far too technical legal
process, prolonged litigation and inordinate delay in disposal of
cases.
2. This form of redressal is needed for enabling the common
people to ventilate their grievances against the state agencies or
against other citizens and to seek a just settlement if possible.
3. There are certain definite advantages of this institution.
4. The parties are saved from extremely technical court
procedures, which are followed in a regular court.
5. They are saved from protracted litigation, anxiety, bitterness
apart from the saving of expenses of court fees and other expenses,
which they are likely to incur in future litigations by way of further
appeal etc.
6. The organization of Lok Adalat is informal and flexible. Apart
from some minimum requirements in respect of procedures and
approaches, the rest of the exercise is simple and varied as the
nature of the problems and the culture of the community demand.
20
Lok Adalat
7. The following types of cases can be brought before the Lok
Adalats;
(a)Pre-litigation cases i.e. the disputes, which have not yet gone to
the law courts.
(b)Pending cases i.e. the disputes, which have already gone to the
law courts.
Merits of Lok Adalat
1. There is no Court-fee and if Court fee is already paid the
amount will be refundable if the dispute is settled at Lok
Adalat according to rules.
2. The basic features of Lok Adalat are the procedural
flexibility and speedy trail of the dispute. There is no strict
application of procedural law wihile accessing the claim by
Lok Adalat.
3. The parties of the dispute can directly interact with the Judge
through their counsel which is no possible in regular Court of
Law.
4. The award by the Lok Adalat is binding on the parties to the
dispute and its order is capable of execution through legal
process. No appeal lies against the order of the Lok Adalat.
21
Lok Adalat
In every respect the scheme of Lok Adalat is boon to the
litigant public where they can get their disputes settled fast
and free of cost.
Legislative Recognition
Lok Adalats have been given statutory recognition by Legal
Services Authorities Act 1987. Pursuant to the constitutional
mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution in India, contains
various provision for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat.
With the object of providing free legal aid. Govt. of India had, by a
resolution dated the 26th September, 1980 appointed the
“Committee for Implementing Legal aid schemes (CILAS) under
the chairmanship of Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati. The committee
prepared a draft legal aid program which could be applicable
throughout India. It is on the basis of the recommendations and the
draft legal aid programme which could be applicable throughout
India. It is on the basis of the recommendations and the draft
outlined by the committee that the Legal Services Authorities Act
1987.9 was passed to establish statutory legal services authorities.
It is also contained that provision relating to Lok Adalats.
9 Received the assent of the president on Oct 11. 1987 and published in the gazette of India, Extra pt II. S. I dt . Oct 10.1987 pp- 1-12
22
Lok Adalat
This Act was finally enforced on 9th November, 1985 after certain
amendments were introduced therein by the Amendment Act 1994.
It provides for constitutional National Legal Services Authorities at
the Central Level and the state Legal Services Authority in States.
Section 19 to 22 of the Act contain provisions relating to the
composition, function, jurisdiction etc. of Lok Adalats which are
given statutory status and recognition under the Act. It is also
contains the provisions dealing with preventive legal and
services, legal literacy and para legal services which needs to be
extended to the remotest areas for the benefit of the rural
population.
Thus the ancient concept of Lok Adalat has now statutory basis. It
is an act to constitute legal services authorities to provide free and
competent legal services to the weaker section of the society to
ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any
citizen by reasons of economic or other disabilities and to organize
Lok Adalats to secure that operations of legal system promotes
Justice on the basis of equal opportunity. In pursuance of the
objects of the Act, Permanent Lok Adalat have been established.
The system of the Lok Adalat has also been included as an ADR
under Section 89 (1) of CPC by 2002 amendment.10
10 Civil Judicial Reform and ADR (2002) 6 CLA-BL-Supp.(Mag)
23
Lok Adalat
Some of the relevant sections from the Legal Authority Act, 1857
are quoted as under:-
Section 19
1. Central, State District and Talauk Legal Services authority
has been created who are responsible for organizing adalats.
2. Conciliation for Lok Adalat compromise the following:
a. A sitting or retired judicial officer
b. Other persons of repute as may be prescribed by the
State Govt. on Consultation with the chief Justice of
High Court.
Section 20
Case can be referred for concideration of Lok Adalat as under:-
1. By consent of both the parties to he disputes.
2. One of the parties makes an application for reference.
3. Where the court is satisfied that the matter is an appropriate
one to be taken cognizance of y the lok adalat.
4. Compromise settlement shall be guided by the principles of
Justice, Equity, fair play and other legal principles.
24
Lok Adalat
5. Where no compromise has been arrived at through
conciliation the matter shall be returned to the concerned
Court for disposal in accordance with law.
Section 21
The provision relating to settlement or award made by the Lok
Adalat are contained in this section. The section provides that
every award of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of a
civil Court. Therefore, the award needs not to be referred to the
Court for consent decree. The section further provide that every
award made by the Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the
parties to the dispute and there shall be no appeal against such
award.
In the case of P.T Thomas V.Thomas Job,11 the Supreme Court
held that the award of the lo adalat is not the result if a contest on
merits it is as equal and on a par with a decree on compromise and
will have the same binding effect and be conclusive as decree of a
Court. The Court futher held that Lok Adalat award being passed
with consent of parties, no appeal shall be lie there from as
provided under section 96 (3)12 CPC furthermore, the same cannot
be challenged under any of the remedies available under law,
including by invoking Article 226 of the constitution. The award
passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the Court itself through 11 (2005) 6 SCC47812 No appeal shall lie from a decree passed by the court with the consent of parties
25
Lok Adalat
arrived at b the simpler method of conciliation instead of the
process of argument in Court.
Section 22
Every Proceeding of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial
proceedings for the purpose of:
1. Summoning of witnesses
2. Discovery of documents
3. Receiving evidences of Affidavits
4. Requisitioning of public record
5. such other matters as may be prescribed.
Landmark Decision of Hon’ble Delhi High
Abdul Hasan and National Legal Services Authority
- Petitioner Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board and others -
Respondents.13
Facts of the Case - The petitioner filed a writ
petition before Delhi High Court for restoration of
electricity at his premises, which was disconnected
by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) on account of
13Court AIR 1999 Delhi Page- 88
26
Lok Adalat
non-payment of Bill. Inter alia, the grievances of the
citizens were not only confined to the DVB but also
directed against the State agencies like DDA,
Municipal Corporation, MTNL, GIC and other
bodies, Court notices were directed to be issued to
NALSA and Delhi State Legal Service Authority.
Judgment Held- His lordship Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Anil Dev Singh passed the order giving directions
for setting up of permanent Lok Adalats. The
scholarly observations of His Lordship Mr. Justice
Anil Dev Singh deserve special commendations and
are worthy of note. It will be profitable to reproduce
the important text and abstract from this judgment,
which should be an eye opener for all of us. It should
also steer the conscience of all, as there is an
increasing need to make Lok Adalat movement
permanentfeature.
Article 39 A of the Constitution of India provides for
equal justice and free legal aid. It is, therefore clear
that the State has been ordained to secure a legal
system, which promotes justice on the basis of equal
opportunity. The language of Article-39 A is
27
Lok Adalat
couched in mandatory terms. This is made more than
clear by the use of the twice-occurring word “shall”
in Art-39 A. It is emphasized that the legal system
should be able to deliver justice expeditiously on the
basis of equal opportunity and provide free legal aid
to secure that opportunities for securing justice are
not denied to any citizens by reasons of economic or
other disabilities. It was in this context that the
parliament enacted the Legal Services Authority
Act-1987.
The need of the hour is frantically beckoning for
setting up Lok-Adalats on permanent and continuous
basis. What we do today will shape our tomorrow.
Lok Adalat is between an ever-burdened Court
System crushing the choice under its own weight
and alternative dispute resolution machinery
including an inexpensive and quick dispensation of
justice. The Lok Adalat and alternative dispute
resolution experiment must succeed otherwise the
consequence for an over burdened court system
would be disastrous. The system needs to inhale the
life giving oxygen of justice through the note.
28
Lok Adalat
If we closely scrutinize the contents of the decision
of Delhi High Court, there has been an alarming
situation of docket-explosion and the ultimately
remedy is the disposal of cases through the
mechanism of Lok Adalat.
Setting up of permanent Lok Adalats
The parliament amended the Legal Service Authorities Act, 1987
with the intention to constitute permanent Lok Adalats for deciding
the disputes concerning ‘Public Utiity Services’.
The legal services Authority (Amendment) Bil, 200214as passed by
the parliaments during the budget session ending May assent on
June 11, 2002. This amendment came into effect from November
9, 2002, 9th of November is celebrated every year by all legal
services authorities as “Legal Services Day”. The amendment
seeks to establish permanent Loks Adalats with a chairman of the
status of a District Judge or an Additional Judge or even higher
status Judge and two other persons with adequate experience in
public utility services to adjudicate matters connected with:
14 Ins. By Act 37 of 2002 (Sec. 22A to Sec22E)
29
Lok Adalat
Transports Services of passengers or goods by air, road and
water;
Postal, telegraph or telephone service;
Supply of power, light or water to the public by any
establishment;
Public conservancy or sanitation;
Services in hospital or dispensaries
Insurance Services
With a primary jurisdiction upto Rs. 10 lacs with a provision that
the Central Government may increase the monetary jurisdiction of
Public Utility Services by amendment in the rules only and without
going to the parliament. The permanent Lok Adalat will adjudicate
pre-litigative disputes and its awards will be binding within the
meaning of Civil Procedure Code.
Thus we can say the success of Lok Adalat in India is tremendous.
Lok Adalat has provided an important Juristic technology and vital
tool for easy and early settlement of disputes. It has been proved to
be a successful and viable national imperative and in combency,
best suited for the large and higher sections of the present society
and Indian System.
30
Lok Adalat
NATURE AND SCOPE OF LOK ADALAT
SYSTEM
Lok Adalat means people’s court which resolves the disputes
of parties by discussion, counseling, persuation and conciliation
with the mutual and free consent of the parties. Lok Adalat works
as supplementary to the Judicial System to reduce the mounting
arrears. Lok Adalat makes voluntary settlement between parties of
a dispute at pre-litigative and the post-liitgative statge.15 Under
Section 19, Lok Adalat can be organized by various legal services
authorities or committees16 at such intervals and places and for
exercising distinct and separate jurisdiction over areas as it thinks
fit.
Lok Adalat have jurisdiction to determine and arrive at a
compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in
respect of any matter falling within the jurisdiction of any civil,
criminal or revenue court or any tribunal constituted under any law
for the time being in force in the area for which the Lok Adalat is
organized. But any matter relating to an offence not compoundable
15 The Legal Service A uthorities Act , 1987 Section 19(5)16 Every state authority or district authority or the supreme court legal service authority committee or every high court legal service authority committee or legal service committee
31
Lok Adalat
under any law cannot be decided by the Adalat even if the parties
involved therein agree to settle the same.17
The Parliament amended the Legal Services Authorities Act
in 2002, and by this amendment, the Central Authority or every
State Authority has power to establish Permanent Lok Adalat at
such places and for exercising such jurisdiction in respect of one or
more public utility services and for such prescribed areqa.39
According to Sec. 22A(b) “Public Utility Service” means any
transport service or the carriage of passengers or goods; postal,
telegraph or telephone services; supply of power, light or water to
the public by any establishment; system of public conservancy or
sanitation; service in hospital or dispensary; or insurance service;
and include any service which may be declared to be a public
utility service by Central Government or State Government.
Permanent Lok Adalat also have jurisdiction to settle the
compoundable criminal offences and the matter where the value of
property in dispute does not exceed ten lakh rupees.18 So, the scope
of Lok Adalat is very wide so as to include all types of matters
except the non-compoundable criminal offences.
17 Sukhal v. State of U.P ,2002 Cr L.J (All) 152418 The Legal Service Authorities Act ,1987 Section 22b (1)
32
Lok Adalat
STRUCTURE AND PROCEDURE OF LOK
ADALAT
There are two kinds of Lok Adalat (i) Lok Adalat (ii)
Permanent Lok Adalats. Under Section 19(2), Every Lok Adalat
organized for an area shall consist of such number of (a) serving or
retired judicial officer and (b) other reputed persons as prescribed
by the concerned authority.
Every Permanent Lok Adalat established for an area shall
consist of (a) a person who is, or has been, a district judge or
additional district judge or has held judicial office higher in rank
than that of a district judge, shall be the chairman of the Permanent
Lok Adalat; and (b) two other persons having adequate experience
in public utility service to be nominated by the Central
Government or by the State Government.
The disputes can be referred to Lok Adalat by mutual consent
of parties or at the request of one of the parties or by the court suo
motu where the court is satisfied that the matter is an appropriate
one to be taken cognizance by the Lok Adalat. However, as per the
proviso of Section 20, any reference of dispute to Lok Adalat will
be invalid if the parties are not heard in the matter. Lok Adalat
cannot take cognizance of the case unless it gives a reasonable
33
Lok Adalat
opportunity to the parties of dispute.19 A dispute may be referred to
the Permanent Lok Adalat on the application of any party to
dispute for the settlement of dispute and after such application no
party to that application can invoke jurisdiction of any court in the
same dispute.
Lok Adalat settle the disputes on the basis of compromise
and conciliation between the parties and if the parties fail to arrive
at any amicable settlement, then the case is either returned to court
of law or the parties are advised to seek remedy in a court of law.
While, if disputes are not settled in the Permanent Lok Adalat, then
it can decide the disputes on the basis of merit. The Lok Adalats or
Permanent Lok Adalats shall be guided by the principles of natural
justice, objectivity, fair play, equity and other principles of justice.
These adalats are not bound to follow the Civil Procedure Code
and the Indian Evidence Act. amicable settlement, then the case is
either returned to court of law or the parties are advised to seek
remedy in a court of law. While, if disputes are not settled in the
Permanent Lok Adalat, then it can decide the disputes on the basis
of merit. The Lok Adalats or Permanent Lok Adalats shall be
guided by the principles of natural
19 The Legal Service Authorities Act ,1987 Section 22C
34
Lok Adalat
A Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat shall be deemed to
be a civil court.20 Every Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat
enjoys the same power as that of a Civil Court in summoning and
enforcing the attendance of any witness; examining him on oath;
reception of evidence on affidavits; requisition of any public
record or document or copy thereof from any court or office and in
all other matter prescribed under the rules. Every award of Lok
Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all
the parties to the disputes and the award shall be deemed to be
decree of Civil Court. 21 The award of Lok Adalat is an order by the
Lok Adalat under the consent of the parties, therefore, an appeal
shall not lie from the award of the Lok Adalats. 22
20 The Legal Service Authorities Act ,1987 Section 22(2)21 Commissioner of Karnataka State Public Instruction (education) v. Simpi , AIR 2001 Kant 504
22 The Legal Service Authorities Act ,1987 Section 22
35
Lok Adalat
GOAL OF LOK ADALAT: MEASURES FOR
ITS ACHIEVEMENT
There is a Latin maxim that “interest reipublicae ut sit finish
litimus” it is the interest of the State that there should be an end of
law suits.
The concept of Lok Adalat is based upon to achieve this goal.
In Lok Adalat the cases are decided on the basis of amicable
settlement. Settlement by compromise ends litigation. A Lok
Adalat is a rustic tribunal based on the concept of village
panchayat. Most of the litigation in our Court is rural. A judicial
system based on common law and strict rules of procedure is not
common law and strict rules of procedure is not suited to our
primitive rural society. Therefore a different system is needed. The
concept of Lok Adalat derives from this requirement. Lengthy
procedure and healthy life of litigation also contribute to develop
something different from ordinary law Courts.
As nomenclature denotes it is a Court of ordinary masses
where a litigant can express his grievances by open mind, without
hesitation and directly to the Court. It is something different from
Court of law. It aims towards conciliation between confliction
interest and justice. When conciliation fails a Lok Adalat is not
empowered to adjudicate the matter except in case of public utility
36
Lok Adalat
services. Therefore the scope of Lok Adalat is limited to cases
when parties are at settlement and have resolved their disputes. In
our civil and criminal procedural law there is an effective provision
for compounding of offences and compromise of cases. The parties
can very well settle their disputes and end the litigation in regular
Courts. When there is a provision for compromise and Courts
generally accept the compromise application, then what is the need
to constitute another forum or compromise? The answer is that a
settlement between the parties takes place on the basis of positive
advice and good counseling which can not be possible in regular
Courts. Therefore a different tribunal is needed in which the
pedestal of high office does not appear and the parties are able to
express their mind and the person behind the bench can also
reciprocate the same. With the above object a social worker and
advocates are also included in the Bench. In order to achieve a
fruitful result of the concept of Lok Adalat, a pragmatic provision
u/S. 89 C.P.C. have been included in which a duty is canst upon
the Court to formulate the terms of settlement and after
observation, the Court refer the same of arbitration, conciliation,
judicial settlement through Lok Adalat or mediation.
Although our judicial machinery is very keen to achieve the
high graph of figures of case settled in Lok Adalat but even then
the system is not providing good results. The regular Courts send a
37
Lok Adalat
number of cases to the Lok Adalat but only few are settled. In most
of the case litigants are absent in the Court or sometimes one party
may come but other party may not come. Some times both the
parties are present but their counsel may not be present. According
to section 8 of the scheme of Lok Adalat, in Madhya Pradesh the
sitting of Lok Adalat are held only on holidays or Sundays. In
holidays and Sundays most of the lawyers are busy with their
clients. Only for one case it is inconvenient for them to come to the
Court on holidays therefore mostly they do not turn up. In that
situation it will only be a coming and going affairs of the judicial
officers. The above circumstances frustrate the purpose of Lok
Adalat.
Section 21 (1) of the Legal Services Authorities Act also
provide for refund of Court fees in cases settled in Lok Adalat.
Even then the results is not encouraging. Sometimes the parties are
ready to compromise before the regular Courts but the cases are
adjourned to put the case before the Lok Adalat to provide the
benefit of refund of Court fees or to achieve the high graph of
cases settled in the Lok Adalat. It seems that presently the concept
of Lok Adalat is in a primitive stage and require a new imagination
to meet the above situation. Therefore we must explore the reasons
behind its unsuccessfulness and try to eradicate it.
Scheme relating to Civil Cases
38
Lok Adalat
(1) Every civil case is to be presented before that
designated Lok Adalat according to the amended provisions of
C.P.C. The Lok Adalat may follow the procedure provided in order
1 to 10 C.P.C. relating to parties of suit, frame of suit, institution of
suits, service of summons, pleadings, plaint, written statement,
consequence of appearance and non appearance of parties and
examination of parties.
(2) On first date when case is presented before the Lok
Adalat, the plaintiff may be asked about what is his expectation or
on” what term he would be able to compromise the case. His
answer is to be recorded, which may be useful for future
negotiations with the defendant.
(3) The plaintiff should pay the process fees and file the
copy of plaint according to the number of defendants with the
filling of plaint. The plaintiff shall also file all the documents. The
Court may issue a summons with a copy of plaint to the defendant.
When the defendant appear and file the written statement and the
documents, the Court shall examine both the parties as per the
provisions of Order X Rule (2) C.P.C. This provision is mandatory
but are not being followed in all cases. Rule (2) & (3) are
important for present purpose which reads as follows:-
2. (1) At the first hearing of the suit, the Court – s
39
Lok Adalat
(a) shall, with a view to elucidating matters in controversy in
the suit, examine orally such of the parties to the suit appearing in
person or present in Court, as it deems fit; and
(b) may orally examine any person, able to answer any
material question relating to the suit, by whom any party appearing
in person or present relating to the suit, by whom any party
appearing in person or present in Court or his pleader is
accompanied.
(2) At any subsequent hearing, the Court may orally examine
any party appearing in person or present in Court, or any person,
able to answer any material question relating to the suit, by whom
such party or his pleader is accompanied.
(3) The Court may, if it thinks fit, put in the course of an
examination under this rule question suggested by either party.
3. The substance of the examination shall be reduced to
writing by the Judge, and shall form part of the record.
The examination of parties is much more important to the
Lok Adalats. By examining the parties a Lok Adalat would be able
to know the real facts of the dispute. At this stage the pleadings
and documents have been filed. On the basis of pleadings and
documents the question asked by the Judge must disclose the facts
which may not be in the pleadings and documents. The questions
40
Lok Adalat
may be asked to explore the possibility of settlement which may be
extended to the question ns not relating to the case or totally
irrelevant with the case. After recording the statement, the Lok
Adalat may conversant with the parties and their pleaders about
possible settlement. At this juncture the counselors of the Lok
Adalat may make an effort to convince the parties and help them in
making decision. Keeping in view the pleadings, documents,
statements and observation of the parties, the Lok Adalat may
formulate the terms of compromise. It may give them to the parties
for their observation and after receiving the observation of the
parties the Lok Adalat may reformulate the terms of a possible
settlement. The Court may invite the proposed compromise from
both the parties. If both the party reach at some settlement it may
pass an award which may be signed by both the parties and binding
on them. In order to arrive at some settlement the Court may
postpone the proceeding for future date but the case should not be
adjourned for more than three dates.
Scheme regarding criminal cases
(1) After framing the charge the criminal Court may
transfer all the compundable criminal case to the Lok Adalat. In
compoundable cases the charge is to be framed on the first date
after filing of challan.
41
Lok Adalat
(2) The Lok Adalat shall issue a summons to the
complainant or any other person who is competent to compromise
the case. When the complainant come before the Court he may be
asked to state the realities of incident any may also be asked
whether he is ready for compromise. At this juncture the Court,
advocates and counselors of the Lok Adalat may negotiate with the
parties about composition. If the parties are ready to compromise,
the Lok Adalat shall acquit the accused from the charge
(3) If even after a sincere effort the Court is of opinion that
the composition is not possible, the Court shall send the record of
the case with accused, complainant and other witnesses present in
the Court, to the Court having jurisdiction for trial on the same
day. If it is possible for the trial Court, it shall record the statement
of the complainant and other witnesses on same day otherwise fix
another date and proceed according to law.
The above some scheme increases the burden of Lok Adalat.
The successfulness of the scheme depends much more on the
competency of presiding Judge of the Lok Adalat. His personality
and legal knowledge play an important role in the process of
settlement. His judicious advice reduce the passion of parties and
the fighting parties may come down and a settlement may be
possible. Therefore the services of high caliber Judges are
42
Lok Adalat
required. So the good and experienced Judges of the district may
be deputed to the designated Lok Adalats.
Exclusion of other person from the bench of Lok Adalats
Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act and the
scheme of Lok Adalat made u/S. 4(b) of the Act, provides that the
bench of Lok Adalat shall comprise (i) a sitting or retried judicial
officer, (ii) a member of legal profession and (iii) a social worker
preferable woman. These private persons have been included in the
bench of Lok Adalat with a view to provide a considered and
justified advice to the litigants so that they become able to resolve
their dispute. Their position cannot be said to be more than as a
counselor. The settlement or compromise between the parties is
justified or not is a matter which may be decided by the judicial
authority. The private member can play no role in this regard. The
services of private persons are no longer required for decision of a
case. Therefore there is no need to include them as member of
bench instead they can be included as a counselor of the Lok
Adalat.
General
(1) The counseling and compounding process shall be held
in open Court with the help of parties, their counsels, social
workers, eminent persons or other law knowing persons.
43
Lok Adalat
(2) So many criminal cases be compounded if adequate
compensation are given to aggrieved party. The civil dispute may
also be settled by paying money to the losing party, therefore a
Lok Adalat may consider about the quantum of compensation
which may be awarded to the aggrieved party in civil and criminal
cases. A number of claim cases and cases u/S. 138 Negotiable
Instrument Act be compromised by negotiations with the parties
about quantum of compensation.
(3) In maintenance cases u/S. 125 CrPC and cases relating
to cruelty u/s. 498 A IPC, the counseling and conciliation
proceedings be held in Camera. In case of failure of settlement the
Court shall record the real cause of dispute between husband and
wife which may be considered during trial.
(4) In other cases also if conciliation or settlement fails, a
Lok Adalat shall record the cause of dispute and reasons for its
failure, while deciding the case the trial Court shall take it into
account.
Required legislative changes to implement the scheme:
(1) The implementation of above scheme require that a Lok
Adalat function parallel to the ordinary Courts. If there is
mandatory provision that every case is to be presented before a
44
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat then it require a regular sitting. Therefore the provision
regarding holidays sitting must be deleted.
(2) Section 89 has been inserted in CPC in the year 1999
but even after passes of 6-7 years no Courts are referring the cases
to other institutions. A person come before the Court for
adjudication or settlement of his dispute. It is not justified to
delegate this job to some other forum. People may not trust upon
them. Therefore the provision regarding reference of cases become
redundant. The above scheme provides for presentation of cases
directly to the designated Lok Adalat and it also provide the
formulation of terms of settlement by the Lok Adalat itself. The
idea of formulation of terms of compromise by the Lok Adalat is
important. It provides clues to the litigants to reach at a settlement.
But as stated above, it is not good if the terms of compromise are
made by the trial Court. Therefore, in the light of above scheme
and reasons stated above, the whole provision of section 89
become inapplicable and be deleted.
(3) In the year 1999 when Section 89 has been inserted in
CPC, simultaneously Rule 1A, 1B, 1C has also been included in
Order 10 CPC which provides for the direction of the Court to
parties to opt either mode of the settlement outside the Court as
specified in sub-section (1) of Section 89. These provisions also
provides for fixing of dates of appearance before such forum. But
45
Lok Adalat
in view of the above scheme these provisions are no longer
required, therefore the provisions under Order 10 Rule 1-A, 1-B, 1-
C be also deleted.
(4) The above scheme provides for presentation of civil
cases before designated Lok Adalat. The Lok Adalat shall try to
conciliate the matter and if it is not possible to settle the dispute it
may transfer the case having jurisdiction to try the case. The above
scheme require legislative change in CPC and in the Legal Service
Authorities Act.
(5) The above scheme provides of transfer of
compoundable cases to designated Lok Adalat after framing of
charge. Therefore a provision be made in CrPC which makes
necessary to frame the charge in all compoundable cases on 1st date
after filling of challan and transfer of all compoundable cases to
designated Lok Adalat.
(6) Section 498-A IPC be included in the list of offences
mentioned in Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C
(7) A change is needed in Section 19 of the Legal Services
Authorities Act not to include other persons as a member of bench.
A provision be made to utilize their services as counselor of Lok
Adalat.
46
Lok Adalat
(8) One other thing is also important Section 19 provides
that a retired judicial officer may also be included in the bench of
Lok Adalat. The aim of Lok Adalat is to settle the matter by
convincing the parties. A retired Judge may not have a deep impact
over the parties to settle the matter. Although the may have a long
experience to decide the cases but because he is a retired person it
may be possible that the parties may not concurrent with his
opinion and views. His physical and mental fitness is also
important. Therefore the word “or retired judicial officers” be
deleted in Section 19(2) of the Legal Service Authorities Act.
(9) In the above scheme the cases are to be presented
before a Lok Adalat and are to be presented before a Lok Adalat
and are to be decided by mutual consent, therefore the provisions
under Order 1 to 10 CPC as far as possible. be applicable to these
decisions regarding production of documents, examinations of
witnesses, adjournments and issuance of commission in certain
cases where the circumstances of the case require so far.
(10) Section 19 & 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act
provides for organization of Lok Adalat and cognizance of cases
by it. The implementation of above scheme require a change in the
organization of Lok Adalat and cognizance by it. Therefore a
change in Section 19 & 20 (1) (2) of the Legal Services Authorities
Act is required.
47
Lok Adalat
(11) The offence u/S. 498 A IPC arises due to distortion in
marital relation of the parties. Sometimes their dispute is resolved
and they live together, in that situation a Lok Adalat should be
empowered to record the compromise even after statement of the
complainant and other witnesses or at any stage of trial.
(12) Under the above scheme to examination of parties by
Lok Adalat is required to know the real facts of the case and
settlement. Under Order X Rule 2 (1) (a) C.P.C. this examination
is necessary with a view to elucidating matter in controversy,
therefore under Order Rule 2 (1) (a) after words “with a view to”
the words “know the real facts of the case an settlement or” be
inserted.
Scheme regarding pre trial litigation
Section 19 (5) (2) of the Legal Services Authorities Act
provides that a Lok Adalat have also jurisdiction in a matter which
have not come before a Court. It means that a person may come
before a Lok Adalat even before filing a suit. In the Legal Services
Authorities Act and the scheme of Lok Adalat made there under
prescribes no procedure for pre trial litigation. Regarding pre trial
litigation a Lok Adalat may adopt following procedure.
If a person come before a Lok Adalat with out filing a suit. It
may examine him about his grievance. It may require to file all the
48
Lok Adalat
documents. If the Lok Adalat think that there is a prima-fact case
to call the opposite party it may summons the defendant to appear
in person and file all the documents. When he appears, the court
shall examine him. After examining both the parties, the Court find
out what is the dispute between the parties and on what point it
may be resolved. If both the parties agree and settle their dispute
the Court shall pass an award accordingly which is binding on
them. If even after a sincere effort, the dispute is not possible to be
resolved it may advice “the parties to go to the proper Court for
seeking remedies or give them the correct advice that how they can
resolve their dispute and what are their rights and liabilities.
Scheme relating to pending cases
All the pending cases in which the written statement has been
filed are to be send to the Lok Adalat. The Lok Adalat shall
examine both the parties as per the provisions or Order 10 CPC
with a view to find out the possibility of settlement. With the help
of pleadings, documents and statement of both parties or other
persons, the Lok Adalat shall formulate the terms of compromise
and hand over them to the parties for their observation. The
presiding judge and the private members of the Lok Adalat may
take active part in negotiations between the parties. They may be
helpful to give a correct advice about the rights and liabilities of
the parties and pro and cons of the proposed settlement. They may
49
Lok Adalat
also advice the parties as to what they may get after adjudication
and much or less, what they are getting by the proposed settlement.
If the parties agrees, the Lok Adalat may pass an award which may
be signed by the parties and binding on them otherwise if they do
not come at any settlement. It may send the record of the case to
the concerned Court and direct the parties to appear before it. The
concerned Court may proceed from the stage from which the case
has been sent to the Lok Adalat.
Although the above scheme is a drastic one it transfers the
original jurisdiction of civil Court from ordinary law Court to the
Lok Adalat, but in the scheme, a Lok Adalat would also governed
by rules prescribed in Orders 1 to 10. It shall also follow the other
relevant rules of C.P.C. The designated Lok Adalat is also presided
by a judicial member, therefore, there is no change in transferring
the jurisdiction. From presentation of suit till examination of
parties under Order 10, the procedure followed by the Lok Adalat
would be the same as followed by the ordinary law Courts. One
thing is included in the mid of journey of case, as provided in
Section 89 CPC, the Lok Adalat should formulate the terms of
compromise and try to settle the dispute. If it fails it may refer the
case to the Court having jurisdiction.
Therefore the scheme provide no change in the process of
trial and create no hardship in implementing it. Some formal
50
Lok Adalat
legislative changes are required which may be possible to reduce
the graph of 2 crore cases pending in subordinate Courts of the
country. It certainly change the present adversary system of
administration of justice. The need of the hour is to constitute a
regular conciliation Court which may function parallel to the
ordinary Courts. The spirit of the above scheme is to involve the
concept of Lok Adalat in a real sense and a Lok Adalat would
become a Court of public n its reality.
51
Lok Adalat
CONSTITUTION OF LOK ADALATS
The Legal Service Authorities Act, 1987 (Act No.39 of 1987)
is indeed a prospective and prosperous enactment constituted for
the first time in 1987 – after a lapse of more than three decades
after our country got its Constitution – constituting legal services
authorities at Central and State and District levels to provide free
and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society,
to ensure that opportunities for seeking justice are not denied to
any citizen of this country by reason of economic or other
disabilities and to organize Lok Adalats to secure that the operation
of the legal system promotes justice on a basis of equal
opportunity, as adumbrated in the preamble of the Act. As a mater
of fact, Art. 39-A of our Constitution directs under Part-IV that the
State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes
justice on a basis of equal opportunity an shall, in particular,
provide free legal aid by suitable legislation or scheme or in any
other way to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not
denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.
This Article was, of course, not there right from 1950 but it was
substituted in 1976 by Constitution (Forty Fourth Amendment) Act
with effect from 3-1-1977. Of course to some extent, such a
protection is guaranteed under Art. 21 a Fundamental right in Part-
II of the Constitution for an accused in a criminal case, laying
52
Lok Adalat
down that No person shall be deprived of his life or personal
liberty except according to procedure established by law’.
Interpreting this Article, Supreme Court of India held consistently
right from 1974 onwards that an accused person, at least where the
charge is of an offence punishable with imprisonment, is entitled to
be offered legal aid, if he is too poor to afford Counsel. Further, the
Counsel for the accused must be given sufficient time and facility
for preparing the defense. Breach of these safeguards of fair trial
would invalidate trial, and conviction even if the accused did not
ask for legal aid (AIR 1974 SC 1143 and AIR 1986 SC 991 an
1997 (9) S.C. 622 (367).
2. But, till Act No. 39 of 1987 enacted there is no scope for
the poor and drown trodden to get any legal assistance worth the
name in civil matters. Though Lok Adalat are being constituted at
various places before 1987, they did not attain more value than
voluntary and conciliatory agency without any statutory backing or
support for its decision, though it had proved to be very popular in
providing for a speedier system of administration of justice.
3. This Act No.39 of 1987 has been enacted with a view to
circumvent the avails and drawbacks, which the earlier Lok
Adalats faced in having no statutory sanction for the awards passed
and that too in respect of civil matters only. This Act defines in
sub-clause (e) of Sec. 2 Legal Services as meaning ‘the reading of
53
Lok Adalat
any service in the conduct of any case or other legal proceeding
before any Court or other authority or tribunal and the giving of
advice on any legal matters’. If this definition is correctly
understood in its true perspective, each and every dispute, may it
perspective, each and every dispute, may it be civil or criminal or
matters before any authority constituted under any Act, like Motor
Vehicles Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Shops and Establishments
Act, Consumer Protection Act etc., shall come within the four
corners of this Act. This definition to the proceedings before
judicial as well as quasi-judicial bodies and before any civil or
criminal Court or other authority or Tribunal. As I understand, all
disputes relating to not only in between a citizen and other citizen
but also a citizen and the state may it be civil or criminal including
their service matters – come within the purview of this definition
Sec.2(e) ‘Legal Services’. In this context, it is useful to refer to
Sec.25 of the Act, which gives overriding effect in unequivocal
terms. “The provisions of this Act shall have effect,
notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any
other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having
effect by virtue of any law other than this Act”. The jurisdiction of
Lok Adalat is spoken to in sub-section (5) of Sec.19, which is as
follows:
54
Lok Adalat
“A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to
arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to dispute
in respect of;
(i) any case pending before; or
(ii) any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of and is
not brought before any Court for which Lok Adalat is
organized.
Provided that the Lok Adalat shall have no jurisdiction in
respect of any case or matter relating to an offence not
compoundable under any law”.
From the above section, it is clearly expounded that all
‘disputes’ (civil, quasi-civil, criminal and quasi-criminal) come
within the purview of the definition clause sec.2(c) and sec.19(5),
the only prohibition being in respect of offences, which are not
compoundable under any law.
3. So, in pending matters, the parties can request the Court, in
which the case is pending, to refer the same to the Lok Adalat
under Sec.20 (1) (a) and (b). Under sub section (2) of Sec.20,
the Authority or the committee organizing Lok Adalat under
sub-section (1) of Sec.19 may on receipt an application from
any one of the parties to any matter referred to in sub-clause
(ii) o sub-section (5) of Sec.19, refer the matter to the Lok
55
Lok Adalat
Adalat for determination after giving notice of the same to
the other parties thereafter. The Lok Adalat shall proceed to
dispose of the case or matter referred to an arrive at a
compromise or settlement between the parties, as provided
under sub-section (3) Sec.20, basing its award on the
principles of justice, equity and fair play and other legal
principles. In pre-litigation matters, the Lok Adalat shall
advice the parties under Sec.20 (6) to seek remedy if Court, if
no settlement or compromise could be arrived at between the
parities. Thereupon, the applicant shall be entitled legal
services under the Act, if he come within any of the
conditions laid down Sec.12 of the Act and, if the concerned
Authority is satisfied that such person has a prima facie case
to prosecute or to defend and after taking an agreement from
him under Regulation 27.
56
Lok Adalat
Benefits many
The benefits that litigants derive through the Lok Adalat are many.
First, there is no court fee and even if the case is already filed in
the regular court, the fee paid will be refunded if the dispute is
settled at the Lok Adalat. Secondly there is no strict application of
the procedural laws and the Evidence Act while assessing the
merits of the claim by the Lok Adalat. The parties to the disputes
though represented by their advocate can interact with the Lok
Adalat judge directly and explain their stand in the dispute and the
reasons therefor, which is not possible in a regular court of law.
Thirdly, disputes can be brought before the Lok Adalat directly
instead of going to a regular court first and then to the Lok Adalat.
The most vital benefit under the said Act is that the decision of the
Lok Adalat is binding on the parties to the dispute and its order is
capable of execution through legal process. No appeal lies against
the order of the Lok Adalat whereas in the regular law courts there
is always a scope to appeal to the higher forum on the decision of
the trial court, which causes delay in the settlement of the dispute
finally. The reason being that in a regular court decision is that of
the court but in Lok Adalat it is mutual settlement and hence no
case for appeal will arise. In every respect the scheme of Lok
Adalat is a boon to the litigant public, where they can get their
disputes settled fast and free of cost.
57
Lok Adalat
Though the Lak Adalat lends itself to easy settlement of money
claims there is scope for settlement of other disputes as well.
Partition suits, damages and matrimonial cases can be easily settled
before Lok Adalat as the scope for compromise through an
approach of give and take is high in these cases. The nationalised
banks and other financial institutions are the biggest litigants in all
the civil courts throughout the country. The overdues from the
bank borrowers exceed Rs. 60,000 crores, of which a substantial
number of cases relate to small borrowers. However, for the
reasons best known to them the banks do not utilise the Lok Adalat
scheme liberally. Likewise the state-owned transport corporation
should take earnest steps to settle the motor accident cases through
the Lok Adalat. But it is learnt that the transport corporations are
not willing to settle the cases before the Lok Adalat, since it
involves payment of money immediately.
Disposal of a case through a regular court of law not only involves
higher expenditure but also delay. Generally the litigants are
anxious to settle the disputes as early as possible. If the parties to a
dispute are apprised of the legal position they may agree to settle it
amicably.
Lok Adalats to settle 250,000 cases in Punjab, Haryana
58
Lok Adalat
Chandigarh, Oct 12 (IANS) Special 'Lok Adalats' (public courts) to
be held for two days in December this year across Punjab, Haryana
and the union territory of Chandigarh are targeting to dispose off
over 250,000 cases pending under the jurisdiction of the Punjab
and Haryana High Court here, an official said.
The first-ever mega Lok Adalats, which have been christened
'Samadhan-2008', will be held at several places in both states Dec
20 and 21.
The initiative for the mega disposal of cases has come from the
new Chief Justice of the High Court, Justice Tirath Singh Thakur,
who joined this High Court in August this year.
Hundreds of judges and law officers under the jurisdiction of the
High Court are working over time to make the mega Lok Adalats a
success. Even trainee judicial officers in both the states have been
engaged by the High Court to help in sorting out pending cases in
various categories.
The High Court has a pendency of over 260,000 law cases - some
of them dating back to 1950s.
'Officials from both states and Chandigarh should cooperate for the
disposal of maximum number of cases at this event. Departments
concerned should coordinate with legal services authorities and
59
Lok Adalat
make maximum people aware about these,' Justice Thakur told a
meeting of judicial officers and officials of both states here last
week.
The Punjab state legal services authority (PSLSA) officials said
that the special campaign was aimed at disposing off pending civil
and compoundable cases.
Various cases would be taken up during the mega Lok Adalats for
on the spot settlement, said Punjab's chief secretary Ramesh Inder
Singh.
Cases under Punjab Tenancy Act, Land Revenue Act, Punjab
Village Common Land Acts, Public Premises Ejectment Act,
Northern India Canal and Drainage Act, Revenue cases, partition
and mutation proceedings, Land Acquisition Act and compensation
disputes, Cooperative Societies Act and recovery proceedings,
Election petitions and matters pending before the executive
authorities under various relevant laws relating to urban and rural
local bodies, Excise and Taxation cases, cases under Electricity
Act and Motor Vehicles Accident claims would be taken up at the
mega Lok Adalats.
60
Lok Adalat
The Punjab and the Haryana governments have issued directions to
officials of all departments concerned to list pending cases
category-wise so that these can be disposed off.
The Punjab chief secretary urged litigants and their counsels for
full participation and cooperation during the mega Lok Adalats so
that their cases could be settled on the spot and justice could be
delivered at the earliest.
'The total number of litigants and counsels at various places will
run into thousands on both days of the mega event,' a law officer at
the high court said here.
Haryana last year had become the first state in the country to have
a mobile court in a remote and backward area in the Jhajjar district
of the state. Punjab followed with its first mobile court in Talwara
area of Hoshiarpur district a few months later.
61
Lok Adalat
THE CHALLENGE TO THE DECISION OF
THE LOK ADALATS
This paper seeks to examine the question that given that the
award of the Lok Adalat is treated as final and not appealable, will
there be no remedy if the Lok Adalat acts beyond its jurisdiction
like if it passes an award without compromise, or if the matte id
decided by it in violation of the principles of natural justice, or
passes an ward without considering the statutory duty put upon it
to keep in mind the principles of fair play, justice, equity and other
legal principles i.e. is the power of the Lok Adalat absolute or are
there remedies under certain circumstances?
Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
India
“The slogan of speedy justice has to accomplish a laudable
object. It should not be misused so as to scuttle the process of law
or to do injustice. This is why, an award to be passed by the Lok
Adalat, in terms of sub section (4) of section 19 is required not
only to conform to law but should be guided by principles of
justice, equity, fair play and legal principle”23
23 Dolkar v. Sonam Yoongjor, (2001) 1 J&K JR 29
62
Lok Adalat
Where the Lok Adalat has exceeded its jurisdiction by
adjudicating and arriving at a decision without a compromise or by
violating the principles of natural justice, petitions under Articles
226 and 227 of the Constitution of India have been allowed by the
courts to strike down such orders of the Lok Adalats as being null
and void and without jurisdiction. So as where the decision has
been obtained by fraud or collusion, to the prejudice of one party.
A Lok Adalat award is akin to a consent decree and it has been
observed that a consent decree can definitely be interfered with if
the same is the result of fraud and misrepresentation or such like
factor.24
Arguments for disallowing challenges to awards of lok
adalats
On the one hand it has been held that the correctness of a
decision of a Lok Adalat, being skin to a compromise decree and
having been passed with the consent of the parties, cannot be
challenged by any of the regular remedies available under the law,
including the remedies under Article 226.25
In General Manager, Karnataka State Road Transport
Corporation v. Pandu26, it has been observed, that if the courts
24Kesar Singh v. Balbir Singh , 2005 ACJ 1831
25 Supra to footnote 11
26 1997 AIHC 2081
63
Lok Adalat
were to insist in all the cases for finding out as to whether the
compromise arrived at is just and reasonable or that the agreement
is otherwise tainted with doubt, etc. the very purpose of conducting
the Lok Adalat would be defeated.
Arguments for allowing challenges to awards of Lok
Adalats
“Lok Adalas are constituted under the Legal Services
Authorities Act. The Lok Adalats are not meant to bring down the
pendency of cases somehow. The Lok Adalats are bound to follow
the principles of natural justice, equity, fair play and other legal
principles. If the disputes are not really settled, it will impair image
of the Legal Services Authority and will affect its credibility. The
public will lose their faith and confidence in the system itself.27
Actus Crriae Neminem Gravabit, the Latin Maxim, says that
the act of a court shall prejudice no man.
In United India Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Patramma28 it was held
that an interference with the award of a Lok Adalat for
compensation may be allowed if it is demonstrated that the amount
was absolutely perverse.
27 Krishnakumari v. Venugopal, 2005(2)HLT 185
28 1995 Lab IC 2354
64
Lok Adalat
In Krishna kumari v. Venugopal 29 the terms of a settlement
between the Husband and the wife, provided for a monthly
maintenance for the minor children and provided that it was not
revisable at all. The court found this to be highly detrimental to
the children. The settlement that was entered into at the Lok Adalat
was challenged by the wife through a writ petition, alleging that it
was obtained by a misrepresentation of facts and also that the
terms of the settlement were totally impractical. The award was set
aside on the grounds that it was unreasonable and there was no
application of mind by the Lok Adalat in the passing of the award.
The court also found that there was no real consent 21
of the wife to the agreement on the ground that it was highly
detrimental to the minor children. The court observed that the Lok
Adalat shall not take advantage of ignorance of a party and close
their eyes to the legal effect of the term of settlement.
In Krishna Mohan Shukla v. Union of India30, which was a
case relating to the disbursement of compensation for the victims
of the Bhopal Gal Leak, the Supreme Court allowed the persons
aggrieved by the compensation by the Lok Adalats, to appeal and
file for review of the same before the authority specified by the
court. In Commr.. Kant. State Instruction v. Nirupadi
29 Supra to foot note 2730 20005 AIR SCW 415
65
Lok Adalat
Virbhadrappa Shiva31 while commenting on section 21(2), the
Karnataka High Court has observed:
“The power of judicial review in a given case is implicit
under the Constitution unless expressly excluded by a provision of
the Constitution. This power is available to correct any order
passed by a statutory authority which is violative of any of the
provisions of the statuette. The Lok Adalat is a creation of statute
and gets jurisdiction from it and hence this Court is competent to
go into an order passed by it, to decide whether the order in
question is valid in law. The writ jurisdiction of the High Court
cannot be circumscribed by provisions of any enactment as is to be
found in Sec. 21 of the Act and it can always exercise its
jurisdiction if an order, left alone, would amount to abrogating the
Rule of law”. Where the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is excluded
by statue, it does not imply that the jurisdiction of the High Courts
to issue prerogative writs is also excluded. That is a constitutional
power and cannot be restricted by statute.
The court went on to observe:
“…the Lok Adalat had done its utmost to give effect to the
first part of sub-clause (4) in disposing of the reference with
utmost expendition, but regrettably has given a complete go-by to
the latter part of the clause which enjoins on it a duty to be guided 31 AIR 2001 Kant 504 : 2001 AIR-Kant HCR
66
Lok Adalat
by the principles of justice, equity and fair play… the resultant
award is hopelessly without jurisdiction and contravenes the
principles of justice, equity and fair-play.”
If the Lok Adalat passes an order that is violative of Section
20(4) then it is clearly violating the statute, of which it is a
creation. Hence such exercise can be checked by the High Court in
the exercise of its jurisdiction. It is clear from the above decision
that if the award of the Lok Adalat is in violation of the statutory
provisions, then a writ would lie for quashing its decision.
In Moni Mathai v. The Federal Bank Ltd.32, a writ petition
was filed for quashing an award of a Lok Adalat. The proceeding
before the Lok Adalat commenced when the first respondent-Bank
had filed a request before the district Authority stating that the
Bank had granted a term loan of Rs. 7,19,000/- to the first
petitioner who had not repaid installments. No notice whatsoever
was issued to the petitioners on the application filed by the first
respondent by the District Authority. In pursuance of the
application by the bank a Lok Adalat was held for determining the
dispute. The petitioners as well as the officer of the first
respondents signed a compromise. Neither the petitioners nor the
Bank were represented by Advocates. Based on that compromise
32 AIR 2003 Ker 164
67
Lok Adalat
petition, an ward was passed by a Bench of the Lok Adalat
presided over by the Sub ordinate Judge and an Advocate member.
By the terms of the compromise award, the petitioner had
agreed to repay the entire loan amount together with interest
thereon till the date of payment. Going by the terms of the award
the court held that the petitioners who were debtors have no gain or
advantage by arriving at such a compromise and that it was very
difficult to believe petitioners about the legal consequences of the
terms of settlement. Further the court held that the petitioner had
been misled by the bank as the first petitioner had taken the loan
along with the second and third petitioners who were co-obligants.
However in the letter written by the bank to the district authority,
the name of only one petitioner had been mentioned throughout in
the singular.
There was a clear violation of the mandatory provisions of
the act. There was no notice issued to the petitioners so as to give
them an opportunity to put forward their case the opportunity of
being heard as required by S. 20(2) was not given. There was a
violation of provisions of the Kerala State Legal Services
Authority Regulations also. The petitioners were also not made
aware of the terms of the settlement. The court found that the
award was against the principles of fair play.
68
Lok Adalat
Rejecting an argument against the maintainability of the
petition in view of the bar contained in Section 21(2) the court held
that “When there is patent illegality, error of law or error of
jurisdiction, the High Court can interfere with the decision of an
inferior Tribunal. If there is violation of fundamental right or
violation of any act or Rules or violation of the principles of
natural justice also the Court can interfere with the award passed
by the Lok Adalat under Article 226 of the Constitution of India”.
Hence considering all the above together, the award of the
Lok Adalat was quashed. The court made the following
observations:
“I feel it is the duty of this Court to remind the various
committees constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act
the need to follow the procedure prescribed under the Act, rules
and Regulations strictly. The Lok Adalats are also bound to follow
the principles of natural justice, equity, fair play and other legal
principles. Had the Committee taken care to issue notice to the
petitioners and obtain a written statement containing their version
and placed the same before the Lok Adalat al these unfortunate
disputes could have been avoided. The Lok Adalats shall also not
forget that their duty is not to dispose of cases some how but settle
cases amicably”.
69
Lok Adalat
It has been held that the Lok Adalat is a court within the
meaning of section 2(aaa) and that the proceedings before it are
‘legal proceedigns’33 In State of Maharashtra v. Marwanjee F.
Desai34 it has been held that where the authority has been given the
power to summon witnesses, enforce their attendance and examine
them on oath, and to order the discovery and production of
documents, the nature of the proceedings are quasi judicial.
Now, a writ of cedrtiorair lies to quash the decision of a
subordinate court where it is found that the subordinate court has
acted without jurisdiction, or in excess of its jurisdiction by
overstepping or crossing the limits of jurisdiction, or in flagrant
disregard of law or the rules of procedure or in violation of
principles of natural justice where there is no procedure specified,
an thereby occasioning failure of justice. Thus it is clear that where
the Lok Adalats act in disregard of the duty imposed upon them by
section 20(4) of the LSA thereby causing a violation of statute
which has created the Lok Adalats, it is clear that the Lok Adalat
has acted in flagrant disregard of the law and hence a writ would
lie to quash the decision. Also, where there is a violation of the
principles of natural justice or the Lok Adalat has acted without the
33 A.Ahmed Pasha v. C.Gulnaz Jabeen , AIR 2001 Kant 412 34 AIR 2002 SC 456
70
Lok Adalat
application of mind, the right under Article 14 has been violated
and the decision is arbitrary and hence if a decision of the Lok
Adalat is violative of the Fundamental Rights, a writ a certiorari
will definitely lie.
In Ujjam Bai v. State of U.P.35, it has been held that a writ of
certiorari lies where quasi judicial proceedings have violated the
fundamental rights. Also, in Nagendra Nath Bora v. Commr. of
Hills division Assam36, it has been held that the writ of certiorari
lies to challenges the decisions of judicial tribunals where such
tribunals have violated the statutory provisions. Similarly in
Harbans Lal v. Jagmohan saran37, it has been held that where the
decision of a subordinate court or an inferior tribunal suffers from
a manifest or apparent error of law, a writ of certiorari would lie
against such a decision.
The usage of the work ‘shall’ in section 20(4) shows that the
parameters imposed for consideration by the Lok Adalats are
intended to be mandatory. In Mewa Singh v. Shiromani Gurdwara
Prabandhak Committee38 it has been held that where a creation of
statute acts in violation of statute, a writ would lie to quash such a
35 AIR 1962 SC 1621 36 AIR 1958 SC 398
37 AIR 1986 SC 302 38 AIR 1999 SC 688
71
Lok Adalat
decision. The Lok Adalat is the creation of statute and hence it is
strictly bound by the statutory provisions and a violation of the
statute will make it amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High
Court. Hence if the parameters under section 20(4) are not
followed, there will be a breach of the statute and the writ
jurisdiction comes into the picture.
Hence, it is clear that whether the Lok Adalat is considered
as a ‘subordinate court’ or a tribunal, a writ of certiorari would lie
to quash such award of the Lok Adalat, where it is flagrant breach
of statutory provisions or fundamental rights and causing injustice.
Appeals
Section 21(2) declares that the decision of the Lok Adalat
shall be final and that no appeal shall lie from such a decision. This
is akin to section 96(3) of the CPC which provides that there shall
be no appeal from a compromise decree.39
Conclusion
Drawing the support from above discussion that the ADR
helps in reducing the work load of Courts and thereby helps them
39 Supra to foot note 11
72
Lok Adalat
focus attention on other cases. It is true that the Lok Adalat System
is the unique ray of hope to unburden our judicial system from too
much law and too much technicalities. There are many benefits to
parties of dispute if they settle their dispute through Lok Adalats.
Firstly, justice is provided quickly because of non strict application
of Civil Procedure code and Indian Evidence Act. Secondly, the
dispute can be referred to Lok Adalat at pre-litigative as well as
post litigative stage. Thirdly, there is no court fee if dispute is
settled by Lok Adalat at pre litigative stage and if fee paid in the
regular court then entire court fee is refundable if the dispute is
resolved by Lok Adalat. Fourthly, litigation ordinarily comes to an
end if settled in Lok Adalat because there is no scope of review,
appeal and revision. And above all the main advantages is that
after getting their matters settled, the litigants leave such adalats
with no ill feeling of the others which ultimately leads to happiness
and well being of the society.
Lok Adalat, a mechanism for alternative dispute resolution, is
proving effective for resolving disputes in a sprit of conciliation
outside the court. In India 18, 695, 934 cases has been settled in 4,
98, 154 Lok Adalats held till December 2005. However, there is
need to include more matters on which the Lok Adalats could
settle the disputes like cyber crime, money laundering, matters
relating to education system, taxation, intellectual property rights,
73
Lok Adalat
environment, business disputes and also the disputes relating to
other public issues. The Lok Adalat should be given the power to
decide cases if the parties fail to arrive at any compromise or
settlement. There should be adequate publicity of the Lok Adalats
and their success in mass media so that people may believe in this
system of administration of justice.
74