gawad parangal for cooperative development councils
TRANSCRIPT
Best Performing Cooperative Development Council
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
Eligibility criteria • Must come from the region• Existing for at least 3 years• Active for the last 3 years• With relevant cooperative development programs• Must be endorsed/ nominated by government
organizations, Non- government organizations, or cooperative in the area;
• Adhere to the provisions of MC for CDCs;
DocumentaryRequirements
• 3- year Development Plan;• Manual of Operation• Policies and Procedures• List of Officers• Accomplishment reports (2012-2013)• Certificate of recognition from different
organizations
SUMMARY OF CRITERIA/ POINTS FOR EVALUATION
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
I. Organization, Leadership and Management
30
II. Program Implementation 50
III. Network and Linkaging 10
IV. Social Responsibility 5
V. Recognition/Citation received 5
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
I. Organization, Leadership and Management 30
1. Composition of councilstotal no. of existing members--------------------------------- x 100total no. of members per MC
above 90%75% below 90%50% - below 75below 50%
5
5321
2. Conduct of election as scheduled in the MC 2013- 01 5
• conduct on the scheduled date• Not conducted on the scheduled dare• No election
550
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
3. Conduct of Meetings 5
total no. of meetings conducted--------------------------------- x 100total no. of meetings per MC
90% - 100%75% below 90%50% - below 75below 50%
5432
4. Presence of Development or Action Plan with:
• with development or action plan• no action plan
550
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
6. Implementation• Full Implementation• Partial Implementation• no Implementation
5530
7. Resource Generation and Utilization • with resource generated & utilized for program implementation• no resource generated & utilized for program implementation
Resource generated:% of utilization:Source:
55
0
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
II. Program Implementation 50
1. No. of activities conducted/ Implemented to coordinate/ monitor the different programs of the government5 activities & above4 Activities3 activities2 activities1 activity
86421
2. no. of activities conducted to operational and monitor the Phil. Medium Term Cooperative Development Plan
5 activities & above4 Activities3 activities2 activities1 activity
86421
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
3. No. of consultations conducted to review the PCMTDP 2 or more consultations1 consultations
663
4. Participation in the review/ assessment of the PCMTDP3 and above activities2 activities1 activity
6642
5. Sharing of resource towards the implementation of development plans and programs
6
a. Presence of policies on resource sharing among the membership of the council
with policy/iesno policy
220
b. No. of members- agencies shared their resources to the councilabove 52-41
4420
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
6. Assistance and participation in the holding ofcooperative activities such as but not limited to the celebration of cooperative month, coordination of scheduled cooperative congress trainings and summits, etc.
6
a. No. of activities assisted above 52-4 1
3321
b. No. of activities participated in above 52- 4 1
3321
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
7. Promotional and Development of Coops/ movement 10
• Provisions of assistance in the organization of cooperatives•Promotion of membership in cooperatives (e.g. effort, strategies to promote coops, newsletter) • Issuance and resolutions on cooperative development • Advocacy/ participation to the local and international conferences, summits, conventions, etc. • organizations/ reactivation of CDCs at the Provincial/Municipal/City level
22
22
2
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
III. Network and Linkaging 10
1. no. of organizations with formal partnership/ forged MOA 3 and above organizations2 organizations1 organization
3321
2. No. of international partnership established on coop development
3 and above organizations2 organizations1 organization
3
321
3. No. of programs/ activities conducted along partnership established
3 and above organizations2 organizations1 organization
4
432
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
IV. Social responsibility 5
Social responsibility to community (i.e. calamity assistance, medical mission, feeding program, environmental protection)
5 and above activities participated4 activities participated3 activities participated2 activities participated1 activities participatedNo activity participated
543210
CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
V. Recognition/ citation 5
Awards/ recognition/ citation/ commendation received for the past three years
International awards receivedLocal awards received
32
For Information and Dissemination
Josefina B. BitonioOIC Director
Encoder
Eric Justine R. Ancheta OJT – University of Luzon
Summer 2014