from read india i to read india iii
DESCRIPTION
From Read India I to Read India III. Evolution and Next Strategy. Programs and delivery. Pratham evolution. Read India. Learning to read. Tool is simple. Volunteers can assess. Parents understand. Testing Tool . Simple inexpensive materials. Letters, numbers, and barakhadi chart: . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
From Read India I to Read India III
Evolution and Next Strategy
JRM 2012 2
Programs and delivery
Pre-school
Bridge class, remedial classes
L2R campaign
ASER
READ INDIAVolunteer classesLearning campsScience, EnglishOpen school Learning CentersVocational
JRM 2012 3
Pratham evolution
Service provisionUrban
InnovationService provisionUrbanRuralNational
PolicyInnovationService provisionUrbanRuralNational International
Research ??TrainingContent PolicyInnovationUrban RuralNationalInternational
JRM 2012 4
Read India
Learning to Read•2002-04
ASER •2005-
Read India I•2007-09•L2R •Campaigns
with states
Read India II•2010-13•L2R+ R2L•CAMAL•Learning
camps
Read India III•2013-16
JRM 2012 5
LEARNING TO READ
JRM 2012 6
JRM 2012 7
Tool is simple. Volunteers can assess. Parents understand.
Testing Tool
JRM 2012 8
Simple inexpensive materials• Letters, numbers, and barakhadi
chart: • Simple paragraphs: set of 50 costs
10 cents.
JRM 2012 9
Basis of Read India- MP 2005-06Change in the percentage of readers in MP betwen Jun05 and Jan 06 compared to readers in Uttaranchal and Kerala (Readers = sum
of para level I and sotry level II readers)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th
MP June
MP-ASER
MP- Jan
Uttaranchal-ASER
Kerala ASER
JRM 2012 10
READ INDIA I
JRM 2012 11
300-370 districts
Government Collaboration• Madhya Pradesh 2007-08• Chhattisgarh 2008-09• Punjab 2008-11
• Himachal Pradesh• Uttarakhand
• UP 2007-09• Bihar (Sankalp) 2007-10• Nagaland
No collaboration• Andhra Pradesh• Maharashtra• Gujarat• Odisha • Jharkhand• Assam • W Bengal
JRM 2012 12
Read India I and after
Punjab
Chhattisgarh
JRM 2012 13
Lessons learned
Government Partnership• When governments
participate with energy and focus in combination with voluntary efforts, effectiveness is high
• Partnerships are inconsistent – Government indecision and delays…
• “Holistic” , “child-centric” ideals worked against “learning outcome” focus.
Volunteers and community• Children who attend
volunteer classes learn but reach is a problem
• Targeting specific children may be needed.
• Teaching children in ability-wise groups is effective
• Training time is limited• Community is not always
aware of efforts.
JRM 2012 14
READ INDIA II 2010-11
JRM 2012 15
Block Excellence Program
• Units of 100 villages • 5 clusters of 20 villages
each in Block
• Changed model of volunteer training
• Education for Education added
• CAMaL approach developed
• Learning to Read in backward states and Reading to Learn in advanced states
• Reading to Learn evolving- including assessment methodology
JRM 2012 16
3 years of Read India II
2010-11 Reduced scale – changed training modelEducation for Education
2011-12 Education of Education all statesExperimenting with learning camps- summer camp
2012-13Learning camps all states- main model EFE changingLess volunteer time neededExperimenting for high impact and depth
JRM 2012 17
Government Partnerships
State level• Punjab continued but
uncertain• Himachal for upper primary
math and English content and training
• Gujarat assistance with Pragya
Region or districts• Uttarakhand remedial
learning in BEP• Non-financial in Odisha and
Rajasthan BEP- • Bihar – district level
evolving• Maharashtra on and off• Chhattisgarh 3 blocks
JRM 2012 18
LEARNING CAMP AND CAMAL APPROACH
JRM 2012 19
• MAH, MP, CHHGRH, ODI, AP, GUJ tried learning camps from Sep 2011.
• Other states started in summer 2012
• Volunteer classes continuing in many states but learning camp is the main method of delivery now.
• Summer camps (Apr-May-Jun, Jul 2012): 7005 villages. 200,000 children. Duration varied from 5 days to 30 days.
• Learning camps Aug-Nov: 8333 villages, 300,000 children Std 3-5
• Duration about 7-10 days per camp with ave 2 volunteers
JRM 2012 20
SMS MONITORING
• http://pratham.tlitech.net/
JRM 2012 21
Harshad’s learning camp
JRM 2012 22
JRM 2012 23
CAMaL Approach- Numbers
JRM 2012 24
Questions
Std 3-5 • How many camps are needed
to achieve math, reading, writing goals?
• How can a learning camp delivery strategy be optimized for impact, time, cost?
• Should Pratham modify its delivery strategy to focus on a whole district to achieve best delivery and advocacy impact?
Std 1-2 • Can learning camps be
useful for Std 1-2? • What strategy can be used
for emergent and early reading- numeracy?
JRM 2012 25
WHAT CAN BE ACHIEVED IN 3 LEARNING CAMPS? HOW CAN WE TRANSFER KNOW-HOW TO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL SYSTEMS?
JRM 2012 26
READ INDIA III
Government seems to be moving towards learning outcomes with goal setting. Need to keep pushing
JRM 2012 27
New Context
JRM 2012 28
JRM 2012 29
Broad Academic Plan
Emergent and early literacy- math• Age Groups:
– age 3-5 +6-7 – Age 8-10 /12
• Stage-wise goals in Reading, Writing, and Math
• Listening -Speaking – expression
• Reading fluency and comprehension
• Writing skills – engaging with texts and self expression
Building on basics • Age groups:
– 11-14 – 14-18 – 18+
• Foundation Course in basic reading, writing, math for all age groups
• Math, English, Science for all age groups
• Foundation and Secondary Certification
JRM 2012 30
Organization Read India Leadership
Research
With ASER
Training and Content Group
Training Blocks
On ground leadership
1. Pre-school + Std 1 and 22. Std 3-5
Advocacy
Communication Documentation
JRM 2012 31
CHOICES AND OPTIONS
JRM 2012 32
Width vs depth?
What scale is sustainable• Should we work in 19
states? • If we do cut down.. On what
basis? • Should we scale down
further? • Without scale no ability to
work with governments on large scale.
What depth is sustainable• Should we go on increasing
depth of intervention? • Depth require more time
and money. But, it is also important to offer solutions for broader education agenda
JRM 2012 33
Std 3-5
Learning camp as demo-advocacy
• Demo district? Or, demo blocks?
• 10,000 schools per year for 3-5 years OR 30,000 schools over three years
Impacting governments• Abandon demo work when
working with government? Or, train additional people to work with government?
• Human resource issue
JRM 2012 34
Pre-school and Std 1-2
Demo villages? • Set up balwadis in cluster
centers • Parents’ self help groups?
• Library for children with take-home worksheets etc?
Working with government• Volunteers to work in
schools or ICDS for 1 hr every day
• Does mere training of teachers work? MP government talks.
JRM 2012
Financial sustainability
Private and Corporate funds• More fundraising efforts in
India. • Will corporate funds lead to
diffusion of geographic focused demonstration?
• Long term foundation funding: how long will it last?
Entrepreneurial? • Volunteers and education
entrepreneurs and tutors? Is this desirable
• Pratham Supported Schools- should we support private schools for a revenue?
Should Pratham start or take over or adopt schools?
JRM 2012 36
MORE ON THE 15TH