fredonia oral language and literacy website...
TRANSCRIPT
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 1
ORAL LANGUAGE & LITERACY: DYSLEXIA, WRITTEN LANGUAGE, AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTA FRAMEWORKS PERSPECTIVE
Joan A. Mele-McCarthy, D.A., CCC-SLP, ASHA Fellow
Executive Director
The Summit School
Edgewater, MD
State University of New York at FredoniaApril 28, 2017
LITERACY:
Listening Speaking Reading Writing
The goal of literacy learning is:--to construct meaning from what is heard or read.--to convey meaning through speaking and writing.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 2
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 2
WHAT DO CHILDREN BRING TO THE PRINTED PAGE?
KNOWLEDGE OF SPOKEN LANGUAGE
Semantics
Syntax
MorphologyPragmatics
Phonology
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 3
Marty Sweeney, CCC-SLP, Head of School, The Odyssey School
4
FRAMEWORKS TO UNDERSTAND THE
COMPONENTS OF ORAL LANGUAGE
FORM
USE
CONTENT
Bloom, L.,& Lahey, M. (1978).Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.
Framework
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 3
5
COMPONENTS OF ORAL LANGUAGE
FORM
USE
CONTENT
In a socio-linguisticcontext
PhonologyGrammarSyntax
Morphology
Vocabulary
Sentence comprehensionDiscourse comprehension
Figurative languageMultiple word meanings
Verbal reasoning
Synonyms, antonyms
Social rituals
Pragmatic functions
Conversational rulesBack channel
communicationDr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
Bloom, L.,& Lahey, M. (1978).Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in earlyliteracy (pp. 97-110). New York: Guilford Press.
Frameworks
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
6
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 4
SIMPLE VIEW OF READING
Decoding
Oral Language Comprehension
Simple View ofReading
Or do they?
Reading comprehension
Adding the speed factor to the Simple View of Reading significantly improves the ability to
predict reading achievement. (Joshi and Aaron, 2000)
Gough & Tunmer, 1986; Hoover & Gough,1990
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
7
Processing
KnowledgeSkills
Phonemic processingWorking memoryProcessing speedRapid word retrievalPhonemic processingLanguage processing
Phonological awarenessMorphological awarenessLetter names and soundsPhonics rulesOrthographySyllable structureVocabulary knowledgeBackground knowledge
DecodingEncodingSentence comprehensionDiscourse/Text comprehension Literacy Foundations
Framework
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 20178
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 5
Phonology
Phonemic processing
Phonological awareness
Processing speed
Phonemic processing
Semantics
Vocabulary knowledge
Definitions
Synonyms
Antonyms
Associated
terms/concepts
Multiple meanings
Background knowledge
Syntax
Sentence comprehension
Morphology
Need more information about Oral Language
Discourse/TextComprehension
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
9
10
NEUROBIOLOGICAL SUBSTRATES FOR ORAL LANGUAGE AND LITERACY
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
10
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 6
COMPREHENSION
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
11
FROM SPEECH TO PRINT
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
12
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 7
NEURAL SYSTEMS FOR READING
Anterior-inferior frontal lobe
Left parietotemporal
Left occipitotemporal
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 13
“Children are wired for speech, but print is an optional accessory that must be painstakingly bolted on.”
– Steven Pinker
The Reading Brain Dehaene, 2009
Ozernov-Palchik, Ola, 2016, The Dyslexia Foundation, St. Croix
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201714
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 8
NEUROBIOLOGICAL SIGNATURE OF DYSLEXIA
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 15
NEUROBIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN DYSLEXIA
• Interestingly enough, Dr. Ken Pugh also implicated differences in basal ganglia activation patterns for children with dyslexia
• The basal ganglia is activated more when a person is doing something that requires greater cognitive effort.
• In a 2014 study, Dr. Pugh and colleagues showed that the basal ganglia in children without dyslexia is activated more when they are processing shapes/figures than during reading.
• The opposite is true for children with dyslexia.
• Additionally, for children who read well, the left hemisphere was activated when processing language but the right hemisphere was activated more when processing visuospatial stimuli.
• For children with dyslexia, there is less hemispherically differentiated activity. Both hemispheres were activated when processing visuospatial information.
• Dr. Pugh noted that many people with reading disabilities have careers in art, architecture, and engineering, which require visuospatial processing– but to date this is only anecdotal
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
16
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 9
The basal ganglia are located deep near the base of the forebrain, and have important functions in motor control and procedural learning.Basal ganglia nuclei are strongly interconnected with the cerebral cortex, thalamus, and brainstem, as well as several other brain areas.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
17
HOW EARLY IS EARLY DETECTION?
Raschle, Zuk, and Gaab, 2012
Studied the functional brain networks using FMRI of 36 pre-reading children while they engaged in phonological processing activities
Average age was 5/5 years
Half had a family Hx of developmental dyslexia and the other half did not
The 18 children with a family Hx of dyslexia scored significantly lower on: CELF core language
CELF expressive language
CELF language structure
CTOPP, elision subtest
RAN, objects
RAN, colors
Verb agreement and Tense Test (VATT), Repetition
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
18
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 10
HOW EARLY IS EARLY DETECTION?
• Brain activity in the left lingual gyrus and temporoparietal areas correlated with phonological processing skills
• Family Hx group showed reduced activation in these areas even before learning to read
• Suggests that the left temporoparietalregion reflect an inability to map phonemes to graphemes
• The lingual gyrus is also known as the “visual word form” area and seems to be involved in processing words during reading in children and adults
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
19
Raschle, Zuk, and Gaab, 2012
HOW EARLY IS TOO EARLY?
Studies show structural differences in the brains of children with dyslexia as compared to nondyslexic peers such as: Less gray matter which is used for the information processing critical to
sensory learning Could contribute to difficulty with phonological awareness or the ability to
discern and process sounds in words
Reduced white matter integrity, which form the “highways” for rapid communication from back to front of the brain
Reading ability in young children is related to the growth of the brain’s white matter tracts Arcuate nucleus (connects the brain’s language centers)
Interior longitudinal fasciculus (links these language centers with visual processing centers
Strong readers start out with strong signals in both tracts that get stronger over time
The opposite is observed in weaker readers
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
20
Raschle, Zuk, and Gaab, 2012
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 11
HOW EARLY IS EARLY?• In a follow-up study in 4- to 8-month-old infants, Gaab and her
colleagues found differences in white matter in at-risk infants.
• In MRI scans of the infants’ brains, Gaab found the areas of white
matter “showed reduced integrity in children with a family
history of dyslexia.”
• It is speculated that the regions required to process language
may be less efficient when there is less white matter available for
cross-brain communication.
• However, Dr. Gaab affirms that appropriate intervention can
result in structural changes to the pathways that may result in
better reading outcomes.
Langer, Peysakhovich, Zuk, Drotter, Sliva, Smith, Becker, Grant, Gaab, 2017
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
21
NEUROSCIENTISTS TO FOLLOW
• Dr. Laurie Cutting, Vanderbilt University
• Dr. Famiko Hoeft, University of California-San Francisco
• Dr. Nadine Gaab, Harvard University, Boston Children’s Hospital
• Dr. John Gabrielli, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• Dr. Guinevere Eden, Georgetown University
• Dr. Ken Pugh, Haskins Laboratories, Yale, University of Connecticut
• Dr. Jay Ruekl, University of Connecticut
• Dr. April Benasich, Rutgers University
• Dr. Elena Grigorenko, University of Houston
• Dr. Joanna Christodoulou, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
• Ola Ozernov-Palchik, Tufts University
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
22
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 12
WHAT IS DYSLEXIA?Dyslexia is a brain-based type of learning disability that
specifically impairs a person's
ability to read. These individuals typically
read at levels significantly lower than expected
despite having normal intelligence. Although the
disorder varies from person to person, common
characteristics among people with dyslexia are
difficulty with phonological processing (the
manipulation of sounds), reading decoding, spelling, and/or rapid
visual-verbal responding.
National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/dyslexia/dyslexia.htm23
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
WHAT IS DYSLEXIA?
Dyslexia is a type of learning disability:
Learning disabilities are disorders that affect the ability
to understand or use spoken or written language, do mathematical calculations, coordinate movements, or direct attention. Although
learning disabilities occur in very young children, the disorders are usually not recognized until the child reaches school age.
Research shows that 8 to 10 percent of American children under 18 years of age have some type of learning disability.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stoke (NINDS), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011, http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/dyslexia/dyslexia.htm.
24
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 13
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201725
DYSLEXIA AND SLI: SAME OR DIFFERENT?
Compared children with SLI only, dyslexia only, SLI and dyslexia, and
without impairment
Findings:
SLI and dyslexia do not always co-occur
Some children with SLI do not have a phonological deficit
Some children with dyslexia do not have language comprehension or
syntax deficits
A multiple-component model of language abilities best explains the
relationship between SLI and dyslexia
This distinction is critical to understanding literacy development, instruction, and
intervention. Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
26
Ramus, Marshall, Rosen, van der Lely, 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 14
What does the Research Tell us about Oral language and Reading?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201727
38TH REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT• In 2014, the most prevalent disability category of children ages 3 through 5 served
under IDEA, Part B, was speech or language impairments (43.7 percent). The next
most common disability category was developmental delay (37.0 percent),
followed by autism (8.9 percent). The children ages 3 through 5 represented by the
category “Other disabilities combined” accounted for the remaining 10.5 percent
of children served under IDEA, Part B (Exhibit 12).
• In 2014, the most prevalent disability category of students ages 6 through 21
served under IDEA, Part B, was specific learning disabilities (39.2 percent). The
next most common disability category was speech or language impairments (17.6
percent), followed by other health impairments (14.4 percent), autism (8.6 percent),
intellectual disabilities (7.0 percent), and emotional disturbance (5.9 percent).
Students ages 6 through 21 in “Other disabilities combined” accounted for the
remaining 7.3 percent of students ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B
(Exhibit 20).
• https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2016/parts-b-c/38th-arc-for-
idea.pdf
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
28
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 15
DYSLEXIA AND THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
IDEA Title 1/A/602/30
• (30) Specific learning disability.--
• (A) In general.--The term `specific learning disability' means a disorder in 1 or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, which disorder may manifest itself in the imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations.
• (B) Disorders included.--Such term includes such conditions as perceptual
disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and
developmental aphasia.
• (C) Disorders not included.--Such term does not include a learning problem that is primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities, of mental retardation, of emotional disturbance, or of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.
http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cstatute%2CI%2CA%2C602%2C30%2C29
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
Double Deficit hypothesis
30
Phonological coding (phonological awareness &
letter sound decoding)
Naming Speed(letter & digit)
Bowers & Wolf, 1993, Wolf & Bowers, 1999
Phonological skills
Slow naming speed
Combination of both
or
or
Three subtypes of word level RD?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 16
SINGLE OR DOUBLE DEFICIT & READING
Phonological coding
(phonological awareness & letter sound decoding)
Naming Speed
(letter & digit)
31
Orthographic processing &
Reading fluency
Word reading
accuracy
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
TRUTH PER THE EVIDENCE:
• Skilled reading on-line comprehension of meaning from running text:
• word identification • language comprehension
Skilled word reading is a bigger predictor of reading comprehension in early readers
BUT
Language comprehension is a greater determiner of reading comprehension in children who are at later stages
of reading
Vellutino et al, 2004
32
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 17
AND FURTHERMORE…
• For early and less skilled readers:
Tests evaluating word identification skills better predicted
performance on reading comprehension tests than did oral
language comprehension tests
• Conversely, the opposite was found for more skilled readers
33Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
WHEN CAN DYSLEXIA BE DIAGNOSED?
Preschool – Kindergarten?
Early elementary school?
Later elementary school
Middle school and high school
College and adulthood
34Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 18
KEY DIAGNOSTIC INDICATORS THAT ARE EVIDENT IN THE CLASSROOM AND
AFFECT LITERACY DEVELOPMENT
Knows fewer letter names than peers
Has particular difficulty with associating the sounds of certain consonants with their letter name
Difficulty perceiving and mapping short vowel sounds
Primary difficulty with decoding and word reading
Difficulty with spelling
Poor memory for facts
Poor word retrieval
May understand oral language better than print language
May perform much better in math
Appears to be bright yet struggles academically 35
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
COMMON SIGNS OF DYSLEXIA: PRESCHOOL
May talk later than most children
May have difficulty pronouncing words, i.e. busgetti for spaghetti, “mawn lower” for lawn mower
May be slow to add new vocabulary words
Often have difficulty rhyming
Frequently have difficulty learning alphabet numbers days of week naming colorsShapes
writing name
May have difficulty telling and retelling stories in sequence 36
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 19
KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 4
Difficulty decoding single words, reading words in isolation
Difficulty separating phonemes
Difficulty reading nonsense words
Confuses sight words, i.e. them, these, those, who, and, the
Word guessing based on initial sound/letter
May show word reversals (tip for pit, tub for but), inversions (m for w, u and n), substitutions (house for home)
Spelling accuracy and reading speed are weak
37Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
GRADE 5 - HIGH SCHOOL
Reads slowly because decoding is problematic
Reading comprehension may be problematic
Takes a very long time to do homework
Has difficulty remembering details of what read
Written language is often simple, poorly spelled, punctuated, organized
May have difficulty organizing oral language in class discussions
Often is a dependent learner
38Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 20
COMPONENTS OF READING COMPREHENSION
Vocabulary breadth and
depth
Syntax understanding
Background knowledge
Reading skills
Decoding
Fluency
Working memory
Inference making
Integration of info in text
Understanding story
structure
Comprehension monitoring
But also
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 39
LITERACY: READING & WRITTEN LANGUAGE
Dyslexia & Written LanguageSpelling
Written vocabulary
sophistication
Sentence structure
Organization of thoughts
Paragraph writing
Multi-paragraph essays
Language Comprehension & Written Language
• Vocabulary sophistication
• Background knowledge
• Sentence complexity
• Variety of sentence structures
• Complexity of thought
• Organization of thoughts
• Paragraph writing
• Multi-paragraph essays
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201740
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 21
EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF DYSLEXIA AND LITERACY AS A WHOLE
Describe reading
performance
Evaluate familial,
social, cultural variables
Consider biological/
developmental variables
41Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF DYSLEXIA AND
LITERACY
Administer individual
standardized tests
Examine patterns of strengths & weaknesses
Use data to guide
intervention
42
ORDr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 22
EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF DYSLEXIA AND
LITERACY
Implement Response to Intervention
Tiered evidence-
based intervention
s
Frequency/ intensity, method, setting
Use data to guide
decisions
43
Abott, Reed, Abott, & Berninger, 1997; Reschly et al., 1999
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
EVIDENCE, EVIDENCE, EVIDENCE…
What is not supported by evidence when assessing dyslexia?
44
Use of the discrepancy formula
And is not required by Federal Special Education law, IDEA 2004
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 23
DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN DYSLEXIA AND OTHER
READING DIFFICULTIES
45
Careful standardized, objective assessment, informal assessments, and classroom observation, and clinical judgment can help determine if the child is a struggling reader because of:
• Dyslexia?Poor reading decoding only?
• Specific Language Impairment, Executive Function Disorder?
Poor comprehension only?*
• Dyslexia and SLI, Executive Function disorder?
Poor decoding and comprehension?*
• AllPoor working memory?
• “Sloppy” reader, spelling issues, sequencing, memoryPoor executive function?
• Could be!Some or all of the above?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
LITERACY ASSESSMENT COMPONENTS: “GOTTA
KNOWS”
Foundational Skills
• Phonological Awareness & Phonemic processing• Phonological memory/working memory• Rapid naming and processing speed• Word retrieval
Reading
• Sight word reading • Word attack• Reading fluency• Reading comprehension (background knowledge, recep. Vocab)
Encoding
• Spelling• Written language mechanics• Written language discourse
46
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 24
UNPACKING A “GOTTA KNOW” COMPONENT:
47
Phonological Awareness
Rhyming
Sound sequences
Sound isolation
Phonemic Processing
Blending• Real words• Nonwords
Segmenting• Real Words• Nonwords
Elision
Phonological Memory
Digit span
Word strings
Nonwordrepetition
Rapid Naming
Digit
Letters
Colors
Objects
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
ASSESSMENT COMPONENTS: COGNITIVE
Verbal reasoning
Non-verbal reasoning
48
Memory
Executive Functions
Extremely helpful to know:
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 25
49
EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
• self-regulation• self-direction of our day-to-day and
longer term functioning• purposeful management of thinking• purposeful management of behavior to
achieve some desired outcome• (Kaufman, 2010, p. 2)
YOU ENGAGE EXECUTIVE
FUNCTION SKILLS WHEN YOU:
IDEAS?
Executive functions are operative during reading and critical to successful reading and writing
achievement
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
49
ASSESSMENT COMPONENTS: ORAL LANGUAGE
Oral comprehension of language
• Vocabulary• Grammar • Oral discourse
Expressive language• Oral formulation and organization
50
Extremely helpful to know:
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 26
HOW IS DYSLEXIA SPECIFICALLYEVALUATED?
CORE COMPONENTS ARE IN BOLDED TYPE
Cognitive Achievement Oral Language• Verbal
reasoning
• Non-verbal reasoning
• Memory: short, working, long
• Processing: Visual, Auditory, speed
• Executive function
• Word ident.
• Word attack
• Reading comp
• Reading fluency
• Math calculation
• Math problem
solving
• Math fluency
• Spelling*
• Written language
• Writing fluency
• Receptive vocabulary
• Word retrieval/ expressive vocab
• Rapid naming• Phonological
processing• Grammar and
syntax• Discourse
comprehension• Language
expression/ organization
• Pragmatic language
The Whole ChildDr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
51
Sample OL Protocol
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201752
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 27
Sample OL Protocol
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 53
INFORMAL LITERACY ASSESSMENT
54
• Blend, segment, deletePhonological awareness
• Consonants, basic vowels• Vowel teams
Grapheme/Sound Identification
• Lists of graded words• Non-real words
Decoding
• Timed, graded passage• Cold read• Standard error notations
Reading fluency
• Ask child to write a few sentences and give a choice of topicsWriting sample
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 28
PhonoGraphix ® Screening Instrument
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 55
Reading Reflex, McGuinness & McGuinness, 1999
McGuiness, C., & McGuiness, G. (1999). Reading reflex: The foolproofPhono-Graphix method for teaching your child to read. Simon and Schuster.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 56
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 29
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 57
You see a twig on a tree. Then thetwig starts to walk! It is not really a twig. It is a walking stick. Walking sticks are insects. They looklike twigs. They are thin. They are long. Some are brown. Some are green. A bird may look for an insect to eat. It may see a walking stick. But the bird may not eat it. The bird may think it is just a twig.
13. Why may a bird not eat a walking stick?a. It may think the walking stick is a twig.b. Birds do not usually eat insects.c. It may like to eat twigs instead.
14. What colors might a walking stick be?a. blue and yellowb. green and brownc. red and orange
15. What does thin mean in this story?a. not wideb. very fastc. not short
Talk about what you learnedIn what ways do walking sticks look like twigs?
One minute reader stories from Read Naturally
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 58
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 30
COMPONENTS TO LITERACY: NATIONAL READING PANEL, 2000
• Reviewed all the research available (more than 100,000
reading studies) on how children learn to read.
• Determined the most effective evidence-based methods for teaching children to read.
• Describe which methods of reading instruction are ready for use in the classroom and recommend ways of getting this information into schools.
• Suggest a plan for additional research in reading development and instruction.
https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/Pages/nrp.aspx
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 59
NATIONAL READING PANEL, 2000
Reading comprehension strategies
Teaching vocabulary words
Guided oral reading
Fluency
Phonics
Phonemic awareness
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 60
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 31
DIRECT INSTRUCTION FRAMEWORK
Phonological awareness
Sound-symbol
Syllable instruction
Morphology
Syntax/Grammar
Semantics
Reading Fluency
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 61
Connected
Text
phonology
decoding
morphology
encoding
62
Accuracy
Rate
Error correction
Reading Fluency
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 32
EVIDENCE ON READING FLUENCY
Then comprehension
Then fluency
Most effect on reading accuracy
Guided repeated readings
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 63
Phonological awareness
encodingMorphological awareness
decoding
Core Components: Word level reading
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
64
Word Sense ©
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 33
Consonants
Digraphs
Pure vowels (long & short)
Vowel teams (advanced
code)
Flexibility of code
knowledge
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 65
KNOWLEDGE OF SYLLABLE STRUCTURE
Helps children chunk longer words into manageable parts
Facilitates ability to infer whether a vowel is long, short, a diphthong, r-controlled, or
whether endings have been added.
Helps students read longer words accurately and fluently
Helps solve spelling problems
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
66
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 34
DECODING “GOTTA DO’S”
Evidence-based
Sequenced and
systematic
Multi-sensory
Begin instruction at
students independent
level
Incorporate phonological
awareness activities in decoding instruction plan unless data shows
you it is not/no
longer an issue
Incorporate nonsense words in
instruction
VOWELS MUST BE SOLID!
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 67
DECODING “GOTTA DO’S”
Move word-level
instruction to text at
independend reading level
ASAP
Know processing
issues: guide program selection,
multisensory activities
Use evidence-based error correction practices
Progress monitor
Visual displays for reference at
all times
Provide access to
grade level literature and
text
Integrate phonics reading
targets with spelling
instruction
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 68
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 35
DECODING “GOTTA DO’S”
Seek 80% mastery at the very least, then
spiral back daily to 100%
Assign daily independent read level at home, 5-15
minutes
Build in flexibility of the
code
Build in 30 minutes per day
of code instruction at a minimum, not
including comprehension
instruction
Build background
knowledge and vocabulary
Teach Fluency as a component of
reading instruction, not the means to
teaching decoding!
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 69
Week of
Homework
Decoding
Dictation
Vocabulary
Fluency
Comprehension
Typing/Handwriting
Sample Lesson Tracker
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
70
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 36
Decodingstrategies
71
Blend two, then moreBuild a block, then
stop Identify the suffixCode the team matesShift soundsCode big block wordsKnow by heart wordsCover--ups
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 Word Sense ©
72
Vowel charts Strategies
Suffixes Specific Shift Sounds
Mnemonic illustrations
Charts for certain topics
Essential References and Displays
Classroom, work center, binder, bookmarksDr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 37
Vocabulary breadth and
depth
Syntax understanding
Background knowledge
Reading skills
Decoding
Fluency
Working memory
Inference making
Integration of info in text
Understanding story
structure
Comprehension monitoring
But also
COMPONENTS OF READING COMPREHENSION
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
73
question asking monitoring summarization question answering
story mapping graphic organizers cooperative grouping prior knowledge
mental imagery
Most learning occurs when
multiple strategies are taught in combination.
Reading Comprehension: The evidence says
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 74
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 38
VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION
• Computer vocabulary instruction
• Explicit, active vocabulary instruction
• Incidental vocabulary learning occurs in the context of storybook reading or from
listening to the reading of others.
• Repeated exposure to vocabulary items
• Pre-instruction of vocabulary words prior to reading can facilitate both
vocabulary acquisition and comprehension.
• The restructuring of the text materials or procedures facilitates vocabulary
acquisition and comprehension, for example, substituting easy for hard words.
• Teaching breadth and depth of word meaning
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 75
VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION: ISABELLE BECK
• High frequency words common in oral and written language; of, the, where, howTier 1
• Relatively common that have wide use across content but occur infrequently enough that they need direct instruction; orient, vertical, merit, strideTier 2
• Technical, content-based words; organ, pyramid, stethoscope; not typically addressed in a reading programTier 3
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 76
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 39
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201777
78Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 40
WHAT ABOUT CONCEPTS OR SYMBOLIC MEANINGS?
Definition Formula:
• Concept/Idea
• Salient Information
• In a specific context
• Example/qualifying statement
E.g., “Liberty” is a concept that relates to “salient information” (e.g.,
freedom for all) “in a specific context” (across a nation).
Example: freedom of worship/press
Definition: liberty in an idea meaning freedom for all across a nation
such as religious freedom and freedom of speech79Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION AFTER DEFINING WORDS -
ORAL DISCUSSION
Practice applying words meaningfully in a variety of situations:
The Applause Game
Example: the vocabulary word is “prevent”Ask, “Would a flat tire prevent you from riding your bike?”“Would a broken horn prevent you from riding a bike?” “Would a rainstorm prevent you from driving?”“Would a rainstorm prevent you from having an outdoor picnic?”“Would a loss of electricity prevent you from turning the lights on?”
(If the answer is YES, clap the clappers; if NO, hold the clappers still )
80Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 41
ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION AFTER DEFINING WORDS -
ORAL DISCUSSION
When studying multiple meanings of words to teach semantic flexibility, the “Perspective Everyone!” activity also works well:
Range: What does range mean to a kitchen store worker? Mathematician? Scientist? Archery coach? Cowboy?
81Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
READING COMPREHENSION
• Narrative text• Tier 2 vocabulary
• Framework
• Background information
• Expository text• Tier 2 and Tier 3 vocabulary
• Framework
• Background information
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 82
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 42
Frameworks
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 83
Comparing/contrasting
Sequencing
Reading Comprehension: ExpositoryFrameworks
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
84
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 43
Frameworks
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 85
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 86
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 44
Somebody...Wanted...But...So...
Strategies
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 87
SAY SOMETHING:
Good for structuring conversations about reading during buddy reading.
Can also be used for independent reading response using “say something” stickies.
Strategies
88Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 45
TEXT REFORMULATION
Students transform the text into
a different type of text.
In some cases, you may need to
model the new type of text first.
★ All kinds of texts into comic books, letters or
interviews
★ Poems into stories or letters
★ Stories into plays, movie trailers, or
commercials
★ Expository into narrative
★ All kinds of texts into patterned books (ABC
books, cumulative stories [I Know an Old Lady
Who Swallowed a Fly], or If … Then.. stories [If
You Give a Mouse a Cookie]
Strategies
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201789
ANTICIPATION GUIDES
A set of generalizations based on the
theme of a selection
• Students read the statements and
agree or disagree with each
statement
• These guides activate prior
knowledge and allow students to
make a personal connection to the
text
Strategies
90Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 90
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 46
PROBABLE PASSAGE
● Before reading, give students key words from the text and ask them to sort them according to their probable functions in the text. (e.g., setting, characters, conflicts, solutions)
● After sorting, they write a “gist statement” that offers the gist of what the text might be about.
Tea Party
● Similar to Probable Passage, except that you give students cards with lines and phrases from the text.
● Students mill about and share their lines with each other, speculating on how their lines may be related and what the cards, collectively, might be about.
Strategies
91Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
REREADING
● ASK STUDENTS TO REREAD SPECIFIC
PAGES WITH A SPECIFIC GOAL.
(E.G., REREAD PAGES 4-5 TO FIND
INFORMATION DESCRIBING PONYBOY.)
Double-Entry Journals
In the Book
“Ya’ll didn’t have a piano in that little ol’ shack, didja?” (33)
“Is that bottle of your homemade blackberry wine I see on the sideboard?” (34)
Everything on p. 36
My Response
She’s being pretty rude, calling his house a shack.
What’s a sideboard? Is this real wine made out of blackberries?
This is weird. Is it really happening or was he making it
up? I’m confused.
Strategies
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201792
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 47
SCALES
❖Likert Scales: focus on generalizations about characters or themes; do not have clear cut answers in the text
Ex. Animal experimentation is necessary in order to learn about biological processes.
Strongly disagree disagree agree strongly agree
❖ Semantic Differential Scales: place opposite character traits at opposite ends of a scale; students decide how much of that trait a character possesses
Roger is….
honest
dishonest
Strategies93Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
IT SAYS...I SAY...AND SO
➢ Helps students to organize
their thoughts and follow a
process when answering
comprehension questions
➢ Forces students to use the
text when formulating
responses to
comprehension questions
➢ Can be used for literal or
inferential questions
Question It Says.. I Say... And So...
Read the question.
Find information from the text that will help you answer the question.(Highlight or place a sticky note to mark this part of the text.)
Restate the information from the text and tell how it helps you to answer the question.
Combine the information from the text with what you already know to come up with the answer.
Strategies
94Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 48
95
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
96
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 49
WRITTEN LANGUAGE
Levels of complexitySingle word
Sentence level
Paragraph level
Multi-paragraphs
Text structure Narrative
Expository
Short answer essay
Framework Explicit
decoding/encoding
instruction
Framing your thoughts
Story grammar marker
EmPOWER
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 97
Framing Your ThoughtsSentence structure
framework
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 98Project Read materials, Greene and Enfield
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 50
Use as a framework for
creative writing
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 201799
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
100
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 51
Comparing/contrasting
SequencingUse as a
framework for expository
writing
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
101
EmPOWER Writing Process, Architects For LearningSinger & Bashir
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
102
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 52
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
103
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
104
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 53
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
105
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
106
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 54
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 107
LEVELS OF LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE CAN BE DISTRIBUTED INTO AN INTEGRATED ORAL LANGUAGE MODEL FROM AN ACADEMIC
INSTRUCTION PERSPECTIVE
FORM
USE
CONTENT
Within a sociocultural context
Bloom, L.,& Lahey, M. (1978).Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
108
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 55
109
COMPONENTS OF LANGUAGE AND ACADEMIC INSTRUCTIONForm:
• Reading decoding
• Spelling
• Written sentence construction
• Math formulae
• Sequence of steps in math calculation
• Scientific notation
• Math formulae that explain scientific
theory
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
110
COMPONENTS OF LANGUAGE AND ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION
Content
• Vocabulary meaning in all subject areas, including alternate meanings, synonyms, etc.
• Comprehension of complex sentences in any subject area text
• Comprehension of discourse, spoken or written, subject specific as well as for social purposes
• Ability to read to learn vs. reading for pleasure
• Understanding figurative language, metaphors, similes
• Critical thinking using the vocabulary of instruction and the vocabulary internalized for discourse
• Understanding of the language of math and ability
to explain solutions to math problems
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 56
111
COMPONENTS OF LANGUAGE AND ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION
Language Use – Pragmatics
• Understanding implicit meaning as well as explicit in
literature, social studies, and the politics of content area
subjects
• Understanding humor
• Understanding hidden motivations of characters in
literature, leaders in history
• Understanding applications of math instruction in every
day life
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
List things that you teach
that would be considered a “form”
component
Reading
WritingScience
Math
Social Studies
Art
Music
P.E.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
112
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 57
List things that you teach
that would be considered a “content”
component
Reading
WritingScience
Math
Social Studies
Art
Music
P.E.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
113
List things that you teach
that would be considered a “use”
component
Reading
WritingScience
Math
Social Studies
Art
Music
P.E.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
114
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 58
115
MEMORY FOR ORAL LANGUAGE & READING
Can the child:• Follow directions?• Recall specific words or information?• Retain what was read?• Categorize?• Adequately retrieve info?• Sequence phonemes for decoding?• Sequence words in sentences (oral or written)?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
116
READING DECODING & ORAL LANGUAGE:
Does the child:• Separate words in sentences?• Separate syllables within words?• Understand rhyming?• Understand concept of phoneme segments in words?• Understand that there are rules for combinations of
phonemes within the language?• Understand that phonemes can make real words and
nonsense words, and can they distinguish between real and nonsense words?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 59
117
SPELLING AND ORAL LANGUAGE:
Can the child:
• Perceive long and short vowel sounds?
• Sequence phonemes, vowels and
consonants without visual symbols?
• Manipulate phonemes?
• Sequence letters as he produces sound
segments within the words? Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
118
READING COMPREHENSION & ORAL LANGUAGE:
Does the child:
• Understand the gestalt of oral messages?
• Recall details he has heard?
• Have an age or grade adequate oral vocabulary?
• Have an age or grade adequate ability to process a variety of sentence types?
• Understand temporal sequencing for time?
• Summarize?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 60
119
WRITTEN LANGUAGE & ORAL LANGUAGE:
Can the child:
• Organize his oral discourse?
• Restate sentences in a different way?
• Tell an event or a movie in a sequence?
• Summarize an event, a movie, an experience?
• Use oral sentences that are complete and have
good word order?
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
120
WRITTEN LANGUAGE & ORAL LANGUAGE:
Expression of Ideas:• Narration: telling a story, event;
• Exposition: explaining or interpreting information;
• Persuasion: influencing the behavior or opinion of another;
• Conversation: staying on topic, response follow the preceding statement;
• Cohesion- orderly, well organized discourse
spoken or written.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 61
121
HOW IS READING INSTRUCTION ENHANCED GIVEN THIS FRAMEWORK
OF KNOWLEDGE?• Phonological awareness training should be included in
early reading instruction.
• Separate form from meaning in beginning reading
instruction.
• Design decoding activities and sight word practice in an
oral language context
• Teach the rules for decoding and spelling and have the
children talk about and apply the rules consciously
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
122
HOW IS READING INSTRUCTION ENHANCED GIVEN THIS FRAMEWORK
OF KNOWLEDGE?
• Match the reading level of the text to the child’s oral language
processing level
• Understand that the components of reading comprehension go
beyond main idea and details; rather the basics are word
knowledge, background knowledge,and sentence structure
knowledge against a backdrop of processing.
• Understand how pragmatic language affects reading
comprehension.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 62
123
HOW IS WRITTEN LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION ENHANCED GIVEN THIS
FRAMEWORK OF KNOWLEDGE?
• Children can usually only write as well as they can speak.
• Children write best when they have a flexible knowledge of
syntax and grammar.
• Children have an easier time with writing when they have a
robust vocabulary base and facile word retrieval abilities.
• Children write stories with more sophisticated vocabulary
when they believe they can spell the words they want to use.
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
HOW IS MATH INSTRUCTION ENHANCED GIVEN THE FRAMEWORK
OF THIS KNOWLEDGE?
• Knowing how the student learns vocabulary will drive how you
teach it and how you reinforce it
• Understanding how a child internalizes and uses sequenced
information will help you understand if they forget processes and
figure out ways to help them remember
• Knowing that a student has difficulty processing “clumps” of
language will help you understand the need to break down word
problems so they are comprehended and solved
• Knowing that a student has rapid naming and retrieval difficulties
will help you understand their math fact fluency issues
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 124
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 63
HOW IS CONTENT INSTRUCTION ENHANCED GIVEN THE FRAMEWORK OF
THIS KNOWLEDGE?
• Pair new vocabulary with simpler terms, experiences, comparisons, drawings, negative/positive sentences
• Provide non-print media support to build content knowledge that underpins new information
• Provide visual thinking maps (BRAIN FRAMES) to frame the kind of information you want the students to learn
• Make learning visible, and map language on to the visible component
• Help students talk about what they learn beyond one word, one sentence
• Help students think about what they learn, why it is important, how it relates to what they know, what interests them, and how to apply it to real world problems
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
125
WHERE DOES THE SLP FIT IN?
Everywhere!Assessment: Formal and
informal
Access to the Curriculum
Teacher training
Curriculum development
• Technology
application
• Job coaching
• Advocacy
•Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
126
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 64
WHY?
Neurobiology of language and processing
Phonology, phonetics and acoustics
Test administration and analysis
Diagnostic prescriptive approach to intervention
Instructional design and flexibility
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
127
HELPFUL DOCUMENTS
Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read (Partnership for Reading, 2003)
Evidence-Based Reading Instruction: Putting the National Reading Panel Report into Practice (International Reading Association, 2002)
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education (U.S. Department of Education, 2002)
Synthesizing the Scientific Research on Development of Early Literacy in Young Children, (NELP, 2006)
Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (August & Shannahan, 2006)
128Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
5/16/2017
Dr. Joan Mele‐McCarthy, CCC‐SLP, Fredonia 2017 65
HELPFUL WEBSITES• The Dyslexia Foundation
• www.thedyslexiafoundation.org
• International Dyslexia Association
• www.interdys.org
• National Center for Learning Disabilities
• http://www.ncld.org/types-learning-disabilities/
• Dyslexia Help – University of Michigan
• http://dyslexiahelp.umich.edu/
• Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Childhood Health and Human Development
• http://www.nichd.nih.gov/pages/search.aspx?q=dyslexia research
• National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
• http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/dyslexia/dyslexia.htm
• Learning Ally
• https://www.learningally.org
• Reading Rockets
• http://www.readingrockets.org/article/c63/
• Center for the Study of Learning
• http://csl.georgetown.edu/
129Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017
THANK YOU!
Joan Mele-McCarthy, D.A., CCC-SLP
Dr. Joan Mele-McCarthy, CCC-SLP, Fredonia 2017 130