fp7 decisions

31
ПОЛЕЗНИ ПРАКТИКИ ЗА УСПЕХ В 7- ПОЛЕЗНИ ПРАКТИКИ ЗА УСПЕХ В 7- ма РАМКОВА ПРОГРАМА ма РАМКОВА ПРОГРАМА Владимир Кожухаров, NMP-NCP Химикотехнологичен и Металургичен Университет (ХТМУ) - ЛАМАР Информационен ден : Нано-науки, нанотехнологии, материали и нови производствени технологии гр. Пловдив, 23 Февруари 2007

Upload: aurek

Post on 14-Jan-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ПОЛЕЗНИ ПРАКТИКИ ЗА УСПЕХ В 7-ма РАМКОВА ПРОГРАМА Владимир Кожухаров , NMP-NCP Химикотехнологичен и Металургичен Университет (ХТМУ) - ЛАМАР Информационен ден : Нано-науки, нанотехнологии, материали и нови производствени технологии гр. Пловдив, 23 Февруари 2007. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FP7 Decisions

ПОЛЕЗНИ ПРАКТИКИ ЗА УСПЕХ ПОЛЕЗНИ ПРАКТИКИ ЗА УСПЕХ В 7-ма РАМКОВА ПРОГРАМАВ 7-ма РАМКОВА ПРОГРАМА

Владимир Кожухаров, NMP-NCP

Химикотехнологичен и Металургичен Университет (ХТМУ) - ЛАМАР

Информационен ден: Нано-науки, нанотехнологии, материали и нови

производствени технологии

гр. Пловдив, 23 Февруари 2007

Page 2: FP7 Decisions

FP7 Decisions

21 DEC 06 - Work Programmes (5)

adopted22 DEC 06 - First calls (42) issued (11ч.)

http://cordis.europa.eu/en/home.htm

Page 3: FP7 Decisions

Specific ProgrammesCooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research

People – Human PotentialPeople – Human Potential

JRC (nuclear)JRC (nuclear)

Ideas – Frontier ResearchIdeas – Frontier Research

Capacities – Research CapacityCapacities – Research Capacity

JRC (non-nuclear)JRC (non-nuclear)

EuratomEuratom

+

FP7 (2007–2013)

Page 4: FP7 Decisions

FP1 FP2 FP3 FP4 FP5 FP6

0

10

20

30

Some statistics

FP6 budget(in billion €, total ≈ 27)

Page 5: FP7 Decisions

FP7 budget(in billion €, total 50.521)

Ideas7.510

Cooperation32.413

Capacities4.097

JRC (n.n.)1.751

People4.750

Collaborative research(Collaborative projects; Networks of Excellence; Coordination/support actions)

Collaborative research(Collaborative projects; Networks of Excellence; Coordination/support actions)

Page 6: FP7 Decisions

FP7 – SP Cooperation

10 Themes (€ million)

* Not including non-nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre: €1 751 million

1. Health 6 1002. Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology

1 935

3. Information and communication technologies 9 050

4. Nanotechnologies, materials and production

3 475

5. Energy 2 3506. Environment 1 8907. Transport 4 1608. Socioeconomic research 6239. Space 1 43010. Security 1 400Total 32 413

Page 7: FP7 Decisions

Funding SchemesFunding Schemes1. Collaborative projects

– consortia with participants from different countries– new knowledge, technology, products or common resources

for research– size, scope and internal organisation of projects can vary

2. Networks of Excellence3. Coordination and support actions4. Support to frontier research 5. Training and career development of researchers 6. Research for the benefit of specific groups (in

particular SMEs)

Page 8: FP7 Decisions

Maximum Funding RatesMaximum Funding Rates

1. Research and technological activities: up to 50% of eligible costs, except for:

• Public bodies: up to 75%

• Secondary and higher education establishments: up to 75%

• Research organisations (non-profit): up to 75%

• SMEs: up to 75%

• Demonstration activities: up to 50%

• Other activities: up to 100%, e.g. Management Coordination and support actions: up to 100%

Page 9: FP7 Decisions

• “Contract” becomes “Grant Agreement”

• “Contractor” becomes “Beneficiary”

• “Instruments” become “Funding Schemes”

• “Audit certificate” becomes “Certificate on Financial Statement”

• “Pre-existing know-how” becomes “Background”

• “Knowledge” becomes “Foreground”

New Terminology New Terminology Simplification of proceduresSimplification of procedures

Page 10: FP7 Decisions

• Instead: establishment of a participant guarantee fund to cover risks

No financial collective No financial collective responsibility, unlike responsibility, unlike

FP6 FP6

Similarities of GA with FP6 contract Similarities of GA with FP6 contract • Core part: GA parameters, • Annex I: DoW, Annex II: Gen.Conditions,• Annex III: Specific provisions for funding schemes• Annex IV, V & VI: Form A,B & C (electronically)• Annex VII: Form D terms of reference for the

certificate of costs and Form E certificate on the methodology (NEW).

• Consortium Agreement mandatory.

Page 11: FP7 Decisions

Overall objective : To improve the competitiveness of EU industry (including SMEs) and ensure its transformation.

Useful Practices

4Y Project

Exact estimation for NMP- theme allocation

Local resources & infrastructure for research

Coordinator, consortium building and funding

Proposal preparation and sending procedure

Evaluation procedure

Page 12: FP7 Decisions

main featuresmain features

• NMP addresses all industrial sectors

• Stimulates strong participation of SMEs

• Promotes a multi- disciplinary approach

• Favours cooperation across the supply chain

• Two stage proposal submission (except CSA)

• Budget allocation by call (not by Activity/Area)

• Yearly updated workprogramme

Theme 4: NMP- Theme 4: NMP-

Exact estimation for Exact estimation for

NMP- theme allocationNMP- theme allocation

Page 13: FP7 Decisions

Four activities: 1. Nanosciences and nanotechnologies 2. Materials3. New production4. Integration of technologies for

industrial applications

Theme 4:Theme 4: NMPNMP

Exact estimation for Exact estimation for

NMP- theme allocationNMP- theme allocation

Page 14: FP7 Decisions

WP - NMP Activity 4.1: Nano S&T

4.1.1: Nanosciences and converging sciences

4.1.2: Nanotechnologies and converging technologies

4.1.3: Health, Safety and Environmental Impacts

Activity 4.2: Materials

4.2.1: Mastering nano-scale complexity in materials

4.2.2: Knowledge-based smart materials with tailored properties

4.2.3: Novel biomaterials and bioinspired materials

4.2.4: Advances in chemical technologies and materials processing

4.2.5: Using engineering to develop high performance materials

Page 15: FP7 Decisions

Activity 4.3: New Production

4.3.1: Development and validation of new industrial models and strategies

4.3.2: Adaptive production systems4.3.3: Networked production4.3.4: Rapid transfer and integration of new technologies

into the design and operation of manufacturing processes4.3.5: Exploitation of the convergence of technologies

WP - NMP

Activity 4.4: Integration of technologies for industrial applications

4.4.1:Advanced wood-based composites and their production - LSIP 4.4.2:Application of new materials including bio-based fibres in

high-added value textile products – SME-TP4.4.3.Multifunctional materials for the future vehicles – LSIP4.4.4:Development of nanotechnology-based systems for in-vivo

diagnosis and therapy – LSIP

Page 16: FP7 Decisions

The tiny revolution

BOTTOM-UP

SYNTHESIS

TOP - DOWN

PROCESSING

Photonic Holey Fiber Genome

Page 17: FP7 Decisions

Networking 2BG local FP7 network ([email protected])

EC/FP7

NCP

NCP

NCP

NCP

NCP

HES

HES

HES

HES

HES

IND

IND

IND

INDIND

UNI

SME

ROR

IND

OTH

OTH

OTHROR

EUROPEAN NCP contacts exists

MESwww.nsfb.net

COOREERS NMP-NCP coordination action

Page 18: FP7 Decisions

Local resources and infrastructure for research

Templates: > Project - Partner search form > WEB site, > CV

> Org. Description, R&D activities, Expertise, > Lab,s Facilities ( reflecting for WP preparation)

Page 19: FP7 Decisions

PPERFORMANCEERFORMANCE

VVALIDATION \ EXPERT SYSTEMSALIDATION \ EXPERT SYSTEMS

MMODELING ODELING

SSYNTHESISYNTHESIS

PPROPERTIESROPERTIES

NANO MATERIALS

PHYSICALPHYSICAL

CHEMICALCHEMICAL

SSTRUCTURETRUCTURE

Page 20: FP7 Decisions

Shock wave

High pressure

Solvothermal

C V D

Hydrothermal Fusion

LASER

Electron

PLASMASputterin

gV. Evaporation

Ion

Solid State Reactions

Gasflame

Sol-Gel + Spray

1 atm. P (atm)

0 t , °C1 2 3 x 1000

ENVIRONMENTAL

ATTRACTIVE

Deposition of thin-film electrolyte and nano- structured electrodes by combustion CVD, sol-gel, slurry coating & templateing synthesis methods are actual at present.

Page 21: FP7 Decisions

-T.EXPANSION, CONDUCTIVITY etc.

-E. CONDUCTIVITY, TRANSPORT BEHAVIOUR, DIELECTRIC etc.

-ELASTICITY, ADHESION,CRACK PROPAGATION etc.

- SURFACE TENSION & CAPILLARITY, TPB etc.

Page 22: FP7 Decisions

Coordinator, consortium

building and funding

Coordinator

Consortium building

Funding scheme

University, SME, Research Organization, Other unit

Small, Middle, Large

Small or medium scale focussed projects < € 4 million

Large scale integrating projects> € 4 million

Page 23: FP7 Decisions

IIMSHL/IAIALUBIN

INMEURICE

IPAEADS

LLIFEM

ELAS

BUH

GENTACASTICRF

UDINECSM

PLALAMCROMOSPHER

NCSRHAI

ISQAVEIRO

INASMETICV

TNO

UNIMAN SEI

TUS

ICF

UCTM

ISRAEL

Page 24: FP7 Decisions

STRUCTURE , INTEGRATION & WP Leaders

PARTNERS 1 - 31

IP- MULTIPROTECT

UCTM

INM & EURICE

GENTA&TIPO

INM

IPA & IIM

EADS

CASTIUDINE & EURUCE

Supported by the European Commission under the 6th Framework Programme

NMP3-CT-2005-011783

MULTIPROTECT

Page 25: FP7 Decisions

Deadlines of the Calls

Collaborative projects

• Closure date of First Stage: 4 MAY 07

10 page proposal: S&T content + expected impact

2 pages: consortium+estimated financial resources

• Indicative closure for Second Stage

SSFRP on 13 SEP 07

LSIP, SME-TP on 4 OCT 07

Coordination and Support actions

• Closure date: 5 JUN 07 – Single stagе

WP - NMP

Page 26: FP7 Decisions

Proposal submission

• Using the Electronic Proposal Submission Service (EPSS)

• Proposals arriving by any other means are regarded as ‘not submitted’.

• Advice: Submit first a draft version one week before the deadline

WP - NMP

Page 27: FP7 Decisions

Proposal

Individual evaluation

Consensus

Panel review

Consultation of programme committee (if required)

Commission funding and/or rejection decision

with hearing(optional)

Thresholds

Eligibility

Negotiation

Commission ranking

Commission rejection decision

Ethical Review

(if needed)

Security Scrutiny

(if needed)

Applicants informed of results of expert evaluation*

• invitation to submit second-stage

proposal, when applicable

Submission and evaluation in

FP7

Applicants informed of Commission decision

10 page proposal: S&T content + expected impact

2 pages: consortium+estimated financial resources100%

20%

50%

Page 28: FP7 Decisions

Evaluation criteria and thresholds

S&T quality 4/5

Implementation 3/5

Impact 3/5

Overall 12/15

• Implementation is not considered in stage 1 and the overall threshold is 8

• For LSIP, in stage 2 the threshold for Impact is 4

WP - NMP

4/5

4/5

8/10

Page 29: FP7 Decisions

FP7 InformationFP7 Information• EU research:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/research • Research programmes and projects:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/

• BG Info centre http://www.nsfb.net

Additional country- specific information:

http://7fp.nsfb.net

Page 30: FP7 Decisions

Be active Be acurate and correct

Show knowledgeShow qualityBe flexibleBe open

Instead of CONCLUSION

FOR YOUR SUCCESS

Page 31: FP7 Decisions