fourth national youth permanency convening april 28, 2005 san francisco, california

41
FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Post on 21-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• THE JUVENILE COURT IS MANDATED TO ACCOMPLISH THREE GOALS:

• (1) KEEP CHILDREN SAFE• (2) GIVE PARENTS A FAIR CHANCE TO

REUNIFY WITH CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN REMOVED.

• (3) ENSURE TIMELY PERMANENCY FOR CHILDREN UNDER JUVENILE COURT JURISDICTION

Page 3: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• “PERMANENCY” MEANS

(1) RETURN TO A PARENT

(2) ADOPTION

(3) GUARDIANSHIP

(4) PLACEMENT WITH A RELATIVE

LAST CHOICE: FOSTER CARE OR GROUP HOME

Page 4: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• “TIMELY” MEANS WITHIN ONE YEAR, OR, IN SOME CASES, WITHIN SIX MONTHS.

Page 5: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• SOCIAL WORKERS HAVE DIFFICULT DECISIONS TO MAKE:(1) WHETHER TO REMOVE A CHILD FROM PARENTAL CARE.(2) WHAT SERVICES WOULD PREVENT REMOVAL?

(3) WHERE SHOULD A CHILD BE PLACED ONCE REMOVED?

(4) WHAT SERVICES SHOULD PARENTS BE OFFERED IN ORDER TO REGAIN CUSTODY OF THEIR CHILD?

Page 6: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• (5) WHETHER IT IS SAFE TO RETURN A CHILD TO PARENTAL CARE.

• (6) WHAT THE PERMANENT PLAN FOR A CHILD SHOULD BE WHO CANNOT RETURN TO A PARENT.

Page 7: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• THE JUVENILE COURT JUDGE MUST REVIEW ALL OF THESE ACTIONS/DECISIONS BY A SOCIAL WORKER…….. AND

• THE JUVENILE COURT JUDGE MUST MAKE CERTAIN THAT PARENTS AND THE CHILD RECEIVE DUE PROCESS OF LAW…….AND

Page 8: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• THE JUDGE MUST MAKE CERTAIN THAT ALL OF THESE DECISIONS ARE MADE IN A TIMELY FASHION.

Page 9: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• JUDGES RECOGNIZE THAT FOR YEARS THE JUVENILE COURT HAS BEEN A BIG PART OF THE PROBLEM.

• COURTS PROCEEDINGS CAN EASILY BE DELAYED.

• ONE CRITICAL ROLE OF THE JUDGE IS TO ENSURE THAT CASES MOVE WITHIN STATUTORY TIMELINES

Page 10: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE

• COURTS MUST ENSURE THAT ALL HEARINGS ARE HELD WITHIN STATUTORY TIMELINES.

• COURTS MUST INQUIRE ABOUT:

• (1) PATERNITY

• (2) RELATIVES

• (3) INDIAN HERITAGE

Page 11: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE

• JUDGES AND ALL COURT PARTICIPANTS MUST TREAT EACH CASE AS THOUGH IT WERE AN EMERGENCY….. BECAUSE IT IS!

Page 12: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE

• ONE EFFECTIVE PRACTICE IS TO REVIEW A CHILD’S CASE MORE FREQUENTLY THAN THE STATUTES REQUIRE.

• ANOTHER IS TO RESTRICT CONTINUANCE REQUESTS BY ALL PARTIES.

Page 13: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• IT IS NO FUN HAVING A JUDGE REVIEW EVERY STEP YOU TAKE AS A SOCIAL WORKER…..BUT IT’S THE LAW.

Page 14: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

THE ROLE OF THE JUVENILE COURT

• GOOD NEWS!!!

• MORE PEOPLE ARE PAYING ATTENTION TO FOSTER CHILDREN…AND

• THERE HAVE BEEN MANY IMPROVEMENTS IN COURT AND AGENCY PRACTICE OVER THE PAST 5 – 10 YEARS.

Page 15: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY WE ARE TRYING TO IMPROVE PRACTICE EVERY DAY

Page 16: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

WE HAVE MULTIPLE COURT SYSTEMS MEETINGS EVERY MONTH

Page 17: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

• THESE MEETINGS ADDRESS:• (1) COURT SYSTEMS ISSUES• (2) PERMANENCY PLANNING ISSUES• (3) EDUCATIONAL ISSUES FACING

FOSTER CHILDREN• (4) CASA/COURT SYSTEMS MEETINGS• AND, IN ADDITION, WE HAVE A

SYSTEM-WIDE, MONTHLY CROSS-TRAINING.

Page 18: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

FAMILY FINDING

• Our commitment to finding permanency for children has led us to develop new attitudes and practices:

• Family Finding• Wrap Around Services• Team Decision Making• Joint Response

Page 20: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• HOW MANY LIVING RELATIVES DO WE EACH HAVE?

• HOW MANY ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TYPICAL CHILD PROTECTION CASE?

Page 21: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• WE ARE COMMITTED TO FINDING FAMILIES

• WE ENCOURAGE A NEW ATTITUDE AND NEW TECHNOLOGY REGARDING FINDING FAMILIES

• “SOCIAL SERVICES ON STEROIDS”• OR• MISSION-DRIVEN MOTIVATION

Page 22: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING: OBSTACLES

• Typical social work practice stops family finding at the immediate biological family.

• Judges/attorney/GAL’s don’t ask.• We assume the family of a parent in prison

can’t be a resource for the child.• Challenging Behaviors discourage us• Non-family placements are easier• These decisions are made based on a lack of

understanding of the developmental needs of children.

Page 23: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• FROM A BIOLOGICAL -- DNA PERSPECTIVE, FAMILY PLACEMENTS ARE SAFER THAN NON- FAMILY PLACEMENTS

• FAMILY MEMBERS ARE MORE WILLING TO “GO THE EXTRA MILE” FOR A CHILD THEY SHARE DNA WITH.

Page 26: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY SEARCH TOOLS

• Prison Locater Services• American Red Cross• Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)• Inter-State Compact for the Placement of

Children

• International Social Services– (BALTIMORE – 410-230-2730

– BE INSPIRED BY ANTWONE FISHER AND SHANE SHALTER

Page 27: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• Our Children’s Services Agency has created a unit that deals exclusively with finding relatives.

• The Agency has concluded that children will be better served when family members are located.

• This is consistent with the philosophy underlying Family Group Conferencing.

Page 28: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• The Children’s Services Unit is called

• RELATIVE FINDING ASSESSMENT UNIT

• SUPERVISOR: Leiam Rodarte

(408) 975-5148

[email protected]

Page 29: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• THESE PRACTICES MUST BE TAKEN STATEWIDE.

• AB 880 (COHN) WOULD DO THIS.• BASED ON WASHINGTON STATE LAW, AB

880 WOULD REQUIRE RELATIVE SEARCH IN EVERY CASE.

• IT WOULD REQUIRE THE STATE TO TAKE A LEADERSHIP ROLE IN DEVELOPING RELATIVE FINDING TECHNOLOGY

Page 30: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FAMILY FINDING

• THE RESULTS IN WASHINGTON OVER THE PAST 2 YEARS HAVE BEEN A DOUBLING OF RELATIVE PLACEMENTS.

Page 31: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANENCY: EMERGING ISSUES

• IDENTIFICATION AND CONTACT WITH SIGNIFICANT OTHERS

– Some states require social workers to identify important persons in the child’s life.

– The legislatures in those states have determined that connecting with significant others is important to children in out-of-home care

Page 32: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANENCY: EMERGING ISSUES

• DIMENSIONS OF CONNECTEDNESS:

• HEART: Who do you love? Who loves you? Who do you want to love you?

• MIND: Who teaches you? What are you learning? Who do you teach? Who do you think about?

Page 33: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANENCY: EMERGING ISSUES

• BODY: Who shares your blood? Does anybody share your body? Who provides you with food and shelter?

• SOUL: To what or whom is your soul connected? What or who are your passions?

Page 34: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANCYCY: EMERGING ISSUES

COLOR CODES FOR THE LINES

• RED is for the heart.

• GREEN is for the fertile and creative mind.

• BLUE is for the blood that runs in the veins

(body).

• YELLOW is for the light of the soul.

Page 35: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

CONNECTEDNESS CHART

Page 36: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

CONCLUSION

The best results will come from leadership within the Children’s Services Agency.

• After all, they are charged by state and federal statute to provide timely permanency for children.

Page 37: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

CONCLUSION

• Judges must take a leadership role in monitoring permanency for children.

• This is the judge’s legal responsibility.

Page 38: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANENCY- CONCLUSION

• ESTABLISH A MONTHLY MEETING TO ADDRESS PERMANENCY ISSUES.

• THE JUDGE SHOULD CONVENE THE MEETING.

• MEMBERS SHOULD INCLUDE REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL PARTIES IN THE DEPENDENCY SYSTEM.

Page 39: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANENCY: CONCLUSION

• AGENDA

• (1) PERMANENCY ISSUES

• (2) THE ADOPTION PROCESS

• (3) EMANCIPATION ISSUES

• (4) CONNECTING FOSTER CHILDREN EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES.

• ANY OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE THAT HAS TO DO WITH PERMANENCY.

Page 40: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PERMANENCY: CONCLUSION

• TIMELY PERMANENCY FOR OUR YOUTH WILL ONLY BE ACHIEVED IF YOUR JURISDICTION MAKES IT A PRIORITY.

• PERSUADE YOUR LEADERS TO MEET REGULARLY ABOUT PERMANENCY.

• IMPROVEMENTS WILL FOLLOW FROM ORGANIZATIONAL STEPS AND YOUR COMMITMENT.

Page 41: FOURTH NATIONAL YOUTH PERMANENCY CONVENING APRIL 28, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

CONTACT INFORMATION

• LEONARD EDWARDS

[email protected]