force structure analysis lockheed martin aeronautics elissa m. bryan

20
FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

Upload: christopher-pearson

Post on 18-Jan-2016

230 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSISLockheed Martin Aeronautics

Elissa M. Bryan

Page 2: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

AGENDA

Overview Analysis of Problem Description of Model Analysis and Interpretation Applications

2

Page 3: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

OVERVIEW

Page 4: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

“Which Aircraft, Which Target,

with What Weapons?”

4

Page 5: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

WHY IT MATTERS

$12k - $15k / Sortie (4th Generation Fighter)

Hostile Combat Zones

Decreased Risk of Aircraft Loss

Decreased Risk of Human Loss

5

Page 6: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM

Page 7: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

DATA SETS

Aircraft Type Tough, Good, Better, Best

Weapon Load-Out Rocket, Small, Medium, Large

Target Type Soft, Medium, Hard, Very Hard

7

Page 8: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

THE CHALLENGE

Comprehensive Model Can Multiple Objectives Be Integrated? Are the Results Realistic? How Does This Affect Run-Time?

Balanced Resource Allocation: Are Resources Being Ignored? Are Resources Used to the Best of Their Ability?

8

Page 9: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

DESCRIPTION OF MODEL

Page 10: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

MODEL DESCRIPTION

Mixed Integer Program 514 Variables 114 Constraints Multiple Objective Functions

10

Page 11: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

CONSTRAINTS

Available Sorties Expected Kills Per Sortie (EKS) Available Weapons

11

Page 12: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

OPTIMIZATION

Minimizing Days in Combat Campaign Minimizing Deviation from Target Requirements

12

Page 13: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Page 14: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

BINARY CUT

10 Days: Success 5 Days: Failure 8 Days: Success 7 Days Failure

Minimum: 8 Days

14

Page 15: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

SUCCESS RATE OVER TIME

15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1040.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Success Rate Over Time

Days in Campaign

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Ta

rge

ts H

it

Page 16: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

EFFICIENCY FRONTIER

16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1040.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Efficiency Frontier

Days in Campaign

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Ta

rge

ts H

it

Page 17: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

APPLICATION

Acquisition Combat Analysis / Planning Force Structure / Size

Do Different Decision Makers Value Different Variables?

17

Page 18: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

WRAPPING UP

Page 19: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

SUMMARY

Force Structure Analysis Analysis of Problem Description of Model Analysis and Interpretation Applications

19

Page 20: FORCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Elissa M. Bryan

QUESTIONS?Thank you for your time!