fmcsa safety regulations: safestat – csa 2010 fmcsa rulemaking updates
DESCRIPTION
FMCSA SAFETY REGULATIONS: SafeStat – CSA 2010 FMCSA Rulemaking updates. Delta Nu Alpha – July 25, 2008 Henry E. Seaton, Esq., www.transportationlaw.net -and- Richard “Rick” Gobbell www.transafety.net. CORPORATE SPONSORS Air & Expedited Motor Carrier Association Apex Capital LP - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
FMCSA SAFETY REGULATIONS:SafeStat – CSA 2010
FMCSA Rulemaking updates
Delta Nu Alpha – July 25, 2008Henry E. Seaton, Esq.,
www.transportationlaw.net-and-
Richard “Rick” Gobbellwww.transafety.net
2
CORPORATE SPONSORS
Air & Expedited Motor Carrier AssociationApex Capital LP
Champagne LogisticsGreatwide Truckload Management
Kings ExpressLandstar RMCS
USA Transportation Services, International
3
About DNA
• Fraternity of transportation professionals• Open to all with interest in education• Interdisciplinary – shippers, carriers, third party
logisticians and students• Traditional chapter format – Milwaukee, Chicago,
Rockford, Nashville, Bowling Green, Grand Rapids, Louisville, Le High Valley
• Student chapters at Western IL University• Scholarship program
www.deltanualpha.org
4
Syllabus of Future Webinars Contains Chronic and Acute Industry Problems
• Format is issue presentation followed by open question and answer.
• Diverse opinions are encouraged.• Goal is to assess issues, impart information and better
prepare listeners as knowledgeable professionals in any industry which too frequently ignores day-to-day problems of contracts, claims and operations in favor of “supply chain management.”
• CCPAC accreditation of 3 courses for cargo claims specialists.
5
Upcoming Webinar Topics
08/19/08 The Scourge of Double Brokering09/16/08 Cargo Claim Mitigation, Adjustment and Salvage Issues10/21/08 INCOTERMS – The Language of the Global Economy11/18/08 Supply Chain Security Issues – Alphabet Soup and
New Regulations
All of the Webinars have been approved for Certified Claims Professional
Accreditation Council (CCPAC) Credit (1.5 CEUs)
For more information and to register, go to www.deltanualpha.org
6
DOT or FMCSA?Who is subject to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations?
Any motor carrier that operates:
1. Any vehicle or combination of vehicles greater than 10,000 lbsGross Vehicle Weight Rating (Driver Qualification, Medicals, Logs etc)
2. Any vehicle or combination vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 26,000 lbs is also subject to Drug & Alcohol Testing & Commercial Driver’s License regulations, in addition to Driver Qualification, Medicals, Logs etc.
3. Any vehicle transporting a hazardous materials requiring
the vehicle to be placarded (DQ, Medicals, Logs, CDL, D & A)
4. FMCSA Registration, evidence of insurance and agents for process is required for any for-hire motor vehicle conducting interstate
commerce regardless of size (SafetyLu Correction Act 2008).
7
DOT-FMCSA Compliance
Review-Audits
A compliance review is currently FMCSA only tool to assess a motor carrier’s compliance with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
1. There are currently more than 600,000 motor carriers in the US
2. There 40,000 to 50,000 new carriers that startup a trucking business
every year 3. FMCSA & State Agencies conduct about 14,000 CR every year
8
DOT ComplianceReview-Audits
So the chances of a motor carrier ever being audited by DOT is very slim.
It would take DOT about 27 years to audit all the motor carriers in its system with its current staff if no new carriers begin operations
9
DOT ComplianceReview
FMCSA currently prioritize motor carriers for compliance reviews for the following reasons.
1. A driver files a complaint
3. Or a carrier’s SafeStat Scores
2. The carrier is involved in a major crash
10
SAFESTATis DOT’s current data collection analysis system used to prioritize what is referred to as “Possible At
Risk Motor Carriers”
DOT Collects this Data from:
State Agencies
Local Agencies
Its own Federal Staff
11
FMCSA Collects Data From:
Roadside Driver/Vehicle InspectionsFederal, State and Local
Moving ViolationsTraffic stops
State and Local
Crash ReportsState and Local
Motor Carriers MCS-150s
FMCSA StaffNew Entrant Audits,Compliance Reviews & Enforcement Actions
12
FMCSA’sSafeStat
• Involves analytically assessing a motor carrier in four Safety Evaluation Areas (SEAs):
– Accident SEA
– Driver SEA
– Vehicle SEA
– Safety Management SEA
• Each SEA is based on two or more indicators supported by different data sources
13
The SafeStat Score• The SafeStat score only applies to carriers with safety
deficiencies.
• Only carriers that have deficient SEA values of 75 and
higher (the worst 25th percentile) in two or more of the four SEAs receive a SafeStat Score.
• For calculations and website details, see Appendix A.
14
Single SEACategories
Specific SEA SEA Value
D Accident 75-100E Driver 75-100F Vehicle 75-100G Safety Management 75-100
Categories of carriers deficient in one SEA (SEA Value of 75 or higher)
SafeStat Categories for Carriers with One SEA Value
Single-SEA SafeStat Categories
15
Example of SafeStat Results
99.23
87.36
97.2
65.75
0
25
50
75
100
ACSEA DRSEA VHSEA SMSEA
Sea Values
SafeStat Score: 383.02
Overall Rank: 19
State Rank: 3
Previous Status: Warning letter
Current Status:
Category A ( At Risk)
CR Recommended
Name: Rollemover ExpressDOT # 12345 Physical Address Mailing Address Power units: 35 Launch Pad Road P.O... BOX 1234 Hazmat Carrier: yes Yourtown, Ourstate 12345 Yourtown, Ourstate 12345 Passenger Carrier: No
16
DOT ComplianceReview
Category A & B SafeStat Carriers are priority motor carriers that will be selected for an on site Compliance Review - Audit
DOT Policy
17
DOT ComplianceReview - Audit
Is where DOT determines:1. What a motor carrier’s Safety Rating will be:
- Satisfactory- Conditional- Un-Satisfactory
2. If a carrier will have to pay a fine as a result of the violations discovered.
3. If a carrier will be able to continue to do business
18
Comprehensive Safety AnalysisCSA 2010
FMCSA’s development and deployment of a new operational model to use FMCSA resources to identify drivers and motor
carriers that pose safety problems and to intervene to address those problems as soon
as they become apparent to the Agency.
19
CSA 2010
• It is a current FMCSA high priority safety initiative –
• It is much a much more in-depth analysis of the data currently
captured by DOT on motor carrier performance
20
CSA 2010 vs. Safestat
• SafeStat’s only intervention is based on:– Safety fitness determination tied to compliance review.– It is very labor intensive.– Result: It only assess a small fraction
of industry.– Focus is on carriers.
21
CSA 2010 vs. Safestat
• CSA 2010 Operational Model ---– Target unsafe behavior.– Safety fitness tied to data; not CR or acute/critical
violations.– Broad array of progressive interventions.– Focus is on carriers and drivers. – Leverage new technology, training, and
information.
22
CSA 2010 Description
• Four major elements ---– Measurement– Interventions– Safety Fitness Determination– COMPASS
23
CSA 2010 Measurement
Today’s Model - SafeStat
• Four Safety Evaluation Areas (SEAs)
• Only roadside out-of-service & moving violations
• SafeStat – results support prioritization of compliance reviews
• No risk-based violation weightings
• Carriers
CSA 2010
• Seven Safety Behavioral Areas (BASICs)
• All roadside safety violations• Results determine ---
– When to intervene– When proposed notice of Unfit
• Risk-based violation weightings• Carriers and Drivers
24
Behavioral Analysis & Safety Improvement Categories
BASICs for Carriers and DriversBehaviors That Lead To Crashes
1. Unsafe Driving2. Fatigued Driving3. Driver Fitness4. Drugs and Alcohol5. Vehicle Maintenance6. Cargo Securement7. Crash Experience
25
CSA 2010 Interventions
Today’s Model
• Limited to compliance review (CR); one size fits all
• CR is resource intense• CR assesses compliance through
rigid set of acute/critical regulations• Generally, audit approach • CR used to determine whether
enforcement is needed
CSA 2010
• Broad array of progressive interventions
• More interventions; many less resource intense
• Interventions target unsafe behavior through weighted BASICs
• Investigative approach; root cause and educational element
• Goal: Change unsafe behavior early, and initiate earlier enforcement
26
CSA 2010 Interventions - Carrier
Tier 1 – Informative– Warning Letter– Focused Roadside Inspection
Tier 2 – Interactive– Off-Site Investigation– Cooperative Safety Plan– Notice of Violation– Focused On-Site Investigation– Comprehensive On-Site Investigation
Tier 3 – Prescriptive– Notice of Claim– Consent Agreement– Unfit Suspension
(Safety Fitness Determination)
Incr
easi
ng
Sev
erit
y
27
CSA 2010 Interventions - Carrier
• Intervention process triggered by: – One or more deficient BASICs,– High crash indicator, or – Complaints or fatal crash.
• Intervention selection influenced by:– Safety performance,– HM or passenger carrier, and– Intervention history.
28
CSA 2010 Safety Fitness Determination (SFD)
Today’s Model
• SFD tied to compliance review
• Satisfactory, Conditional, or Unsatisfactory
• SFD effective until next CR• SFD based on acute/critical
violations
CSA 2010
• SFD tied to performance data; not necessarily CR
• Continue Operation, Marginal, or Unfit
• SFD assigned to all carriers with sufficient data; updated regularly
• SFD based on performance data
29
CSA 2010 Safety Fitness Determination - Carrier
• Status --- CSA 2010 will require:– A major rulemaking– Revise Part 385, Safety Fitness Procedures– NPRM publication - Targeting spring/summer 2008
Look for rulemaking later this fall
30
CSA 2010 Proposed Operational Model
31
CSA 2010 Operational Model Test
• Where ---– Approximately 40 investigators state and federal– Four states – one in each FMCSA Service Center
• Colorado• Georgia• Missouri• New Jersey
– Outreach --- September/October
32
CSA 2010Outreach to Partners and Stakeholders
• Six Listening Sessions --- Sept/Oct-04 • Listening Session – Nov-06
– Washington, DC– Ninety-two persons
• Next Listening Session Targeting ---– Four breakout sessions – 611 responses– Early Nov-07– St. Louis, MO– Federal Register notice– Three topics
• Demonstrate Measurement Systems• Further describe Operational Model Test• Safety Fitness Determination Methodology
33
Industry Concerns with CSA 2010
Small carrier can become “marginal” based on limited and inaccurate data reported by states.
All drivers will be tagged for every citation and their driving histories will effect carrier rating.
Vicarious liability concerns plus publication of new system will throw carriers, shippers and brokers into purgatory.
34
New Entrant RulemakingDocket No. FMCSA-2001-11061
December 21, 2006
Will be much more in-depth than current procedures
Will have 11 violations that will automaticallyresult in a failing grade
Based on current analysis up to 40% of new entrantswill fail the audit
35
Minimum Training Requirements for Entry Level Commercial Motor Vehicle Drivers
Docket No. FMCSA-2007-27748 - December 17, 2007
Requirements
•Accreditation Requirements for Entry-Level Trainees – Institutional and motor carrier training programs must be accredited
•Hours-Based Training Requirements – 120 hours of training (at least 76 classroom and 44 BTW)
Driver Skill Instructors Must have at Least Two Years of CMV Driving Experience
New-Entrant CDL Licensing Process driver training certificates must be provided to the State Licensing
Agency before a CDL License will be issued.
3 year implementation period from date of final rule
36
Hours of Service RuleJuly 24, 2007 Court Ruling
FMCSA Published an Interim Final Rule
Expect the final rule before the end of the year.
11 hour rule34 hour reset
Split Sleeper Berth
U. S.Department of EnergyAgricultural Organizations
and other have requested exemptionsto existing rules
37
On-Board Hours of Service Recording Devices
FMCSA-2004-18940Revised January 7, 2007
Requiring CMV to have install tamper proof electronic onBoard Hours Of Service recording devices
Two year effective date from date of final rule
Expect rule by the end of the year, possibly corresponding to the Hours of Service Rule
38
Hazardous Materials Awareness, Familiarization, Function Specific, Security and In-Depth
Security Training
49 CFR 174.704(a)(1-5)
Applies to Brokers, Forwarding Agents, Freight Forwarders and Warehouses
PHSMA Guide November 2005
Applies to Motor Carriers drivers that only transport Consumer Commodity - ORM-D
(hair spray, small cans of spray paint, cigarette lighters andBaskin Robins whip cream)
Verbal Interpretation April 2008Waiting for written confirmation
39
Questions