final limited phase ii environmental site assessment · concentrations of pahs, ... using an rki...

© 2018 Pinchin Ltd.

FINAL

Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Joseph Wolfond Park West Guelph, Ontario

Prepared for:

City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph, ON N1H 3A1 Attn: Mr. Prasoon Adhikari Environmental Engineer

December 12, 2017

Pinchin File: 214399

Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment December 12, 2017 Joseph Wolfond Park West, Guelph, Ontario Pinchin File: 214399 City of Guelph FINAL

© 2018 Pinchin Ltd. Page ii

Issued To: Contact: Issued On: Pinchin File: Issuing Office: Primary Pinchin Contact:

City of Guelph Mr. Prasoon Adhikari Environmental Engineer December 12, 2017 214399 283 Northfield Drive East, Waterloo, ON N2J 4G8 Stephen Spooner, B.Sc., Hons Senior Project Manager 519.746.4210 ext. 3752

Author: Tim Mansfield, B.Sc. Project Scientist 226.220.7188 [email protected]

Reviewer: Lindsay Shepherd, P.Eng., QPESA Senior Project Manager 519.746.4210 ext. 3764 [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


© 2018 Pinchin Ltd. Page iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained through a Project Specific Agreement signed by Mr. William Stewart of

the City of Guelph (Client) to conduct a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the

property located at Joseph Wolfond Park West in Guelph, Ontario (hereafter referred to as the Site). The

Site is vacant parkland with no permanent structures or buildings present on-Site.

The purpose of this Limited Phase II ESA was to delineate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs),

benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (collectively referred to as ‘BTEX’), polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metal impacts in shallow soil north of the Goldie Mills Ruins property (70

Norwich Street East).

Pinchin completed a Phase II ESA and Screening Level Risk Assessment (SLRA) in connection with the

property located at 70 Norwich Street East in Guelph, Ontario (Goldie Mills Ruins) on behalf of Client, the

findings of which are provided under separate cover.

The findings of the Phase II ESA identified concentrations of PHCs, BTEX, PAHs and metals parameters

above the Table 8 Standards within the shallow soil at several locations at this property, as well as at the

three boreholes advanced north of the Goldie Mills Ruins property boundary (BH101, BH103 and BH104).

Based on these results, Client requested that a Limited Phase II ESA be completed at the Site to

delineate the extent of the BTEX, PHC, PAH and metals impacts in soil north of the Goldie Mills Ruins

property.

The Limited Phase II ESA was completed at the Site by Pinchin on November 24, 2017 and consisted of

the advancement of nine shallow boreholes to a maximum depth of 2.74 metres below ground surface.

Select “worst case” soil samples collected during the borehole drilling program were submitted for

laboratory analyses of PHCs in the F1 to F4 fraction ranges (F1-F4), BTEX, PAHs and metals.

Based on Site-specific information, including the classification of the Site as a shallow soil property in

accordance with Ontario Regulation 153/04, as amended, the soil quality was assessed based on the

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Table 6 Standards for

residential/parkland/institutional land use and coarse-textured soil. The soil samples collected from the

boreholes advanced within 30 m of the Speed River were assessed based on the more conservative of

the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Table 8 Standards for

residential/parkland/institutional land use and coarse-textured soil and the Table 6 Standards.


© 2018 Pinchin Ltd. Page iv

The reported concentrations of PHCs (F1-F4), BTEX, PAHs and metals in the soil samples submitted for

analyses met the Table 6 Standards and/or Table 8 Standards, with the following exceptions:

• Soil sample B203-S1 collected from borehole BH203 located greater than 30 m from the

Speed River exceeded the Table 6 Standards for select PAH and metals parameters;

• Soil sample B207-S2 collected from borehole BH207 located within 30 m of the Speed

River exceeded the Table 8 Standards for select BTEX and PAH parameters, PHC F2

and copper; and


River exceeded the Table 8 Standards for select PAH and metals parameters.

The findings of this Limited Phase II ESA identified PAH, metals, BTEX and/or PHC impacts within

shallow soil at boreholes BH203, BH207 and BH208, located within the central portion of the Site. The

concentrations of PAHs, metals, BTEX and PHCs detected in the shallow soil samples were generally

consistent or lower than the concentrations detected in the soil samples collected during the Phase II

ESA completed at 70 Norwich Street East. Pinchin infers that the metals and PAH impacts detected in

the shallow soil are attributed to the presence of poor quality fill material in this area. The BTEX and PHC

impacts were localized to the soil sample collected from borehole BH207 and could be attributed to an

isolated release/spill of a petroleum product in this area of the Site. Given that PHC and BTEX impacts

were not detected in the soil samples collected between borehole BH207 and borehole BH101, Pinchin

does not believe that the PHC and BTEX impacts detected in soil at borehole BH207 are related to the

former industrial operations conducted at 70 Norwich Street East. It is Pinchin’s recommendation that a

SLRA be completed for the Site or that the SLRA previously completed for the 70 Norwich Street East

property is expanded to include the Site.

This Executive Summary is subject to the same standard limitations as contained in the report and must be read in

conjunction with the entire report.


© 2018 Pinchin Ltd. Page v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ...................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 2

2.1 Borehole Investigation .......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Sampling and Laboratory Analysis ....................................................................................... 3

2.2.1 Soil ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Analytical Laboratory ............................................................................................. 3

2.3 QA/QC Protocols .................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Site Condition Standards ...................................................................................................... 4

3.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 5

3.1 Site Geology and Hydrogeology ........................................................................................... 5 3.2 Soil Headspace Vapour Concentrations .............................................................................. 5 3.3 Field Observations ................................................................................................................ 5 3.4 Analytical .............................................................................................................................. 5

3.4.1 Soil ......................................................................................................................... 5

4.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 6

5.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................ 7


© 2018 Pinchin Ltd. Page vi

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Figures

APPENDIX II Borehole Logs

APPENDIX III Summary Tables APPENDIX IV Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

FIGURES

Figure 1 - Key Map

Figure 2 - Borehole Location Plan

Figure 3 – Location of Soil Exceedances

TABLES

Table 1 - Samples Submitted for Laboratory Analyses

Table 2 - Petroleum Hydrocarbon and BTEX Analyses for Soil

Table 3 – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis for Soil

Table 4 - Metals Analysis for Soil


© 2018 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 8

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained through a Project Specific Agreement signed by Mr. William Stewart of

the City of Guelph (Client) to conduct a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the

property located at Joseph Wolfond Park West in Guelph, Ontario (hereafter referred to as the Site). The

Site location is shown on Figure 1 (all Figures are provided in Appendix I).

The Site is vacant parkland with no permanent structures or buildings present on-Site.

The purpose of this Limited Phase II ESA was to delineate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs),

benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (collectively referred to as ‘BTEX’), polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metal impacts in shallow soil north of the Goldie Mills Ruins property (70

Norwich Street East).

1.1 Background

Pinchin completed a Phase II ESA and Screening Level Risk Assessment (SLRA) in connection with the

property located at 70 Norwich Street East in Guelph, Ontario (Goldie Mills Ruins) on behalf of Client, the

findings of which are provided under separate cover.

The findings of the Phase II ESA identified concentrations of PHCs, BTEX, PAHs and metals parameters

above the Table 8 Standards within the shallow soil at several locations at this property, as well as at the

three boreholes advanced north of the Goldie Mills Ruins property boundary (BH101, BH103 and BH104).

Based on these results, Client requested that additional boreholes be completed at the Site to delineate

the extent of the BTEX, PHC, PAH and metals impacts detected in shallow soil north of the Goldie Mills

Ruins property (70 Norwich Street East).

1.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work completed by Pinchin, as outlined in the Pinchin proposal entitled “Proposal for Limited

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment – Joseph Wolfond Park West, Guelph, Ontario” submitted to the

Client on November 6, 2017 included the following:

• Advancement of nine boreholes following the clearance of underground services;

• Submission of select “worst case” soil samples for laboratory analyses of PHCs in the F1

to F4 fraction ranges (F1-F4), BTEX, PAHs and metals;

• Comparison of the soil and groundwater laboratory analytical results to the applicable

regulatory criteria; and

• Preparation of a factual report detailing the findings of the Limited Phase II ESA and

recommendations.



2.0 METHODOLOGY

The investigation methodology was conducted in general accordance with the following documents:

• Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC, formerly the Ontario

Ministry of the Environment) document entitled “Guidance on Sampling and Analytical

Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario” dated December 1996 (MOECC

Sampling Guideline);

• the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario document entitled “Guidance for

Environmental Site Assessments under Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended)”, dated

April 2011 (APGO Guideline); and

• Pinchin’s standard operating procedures (SOPs).

2.1 Borehole Investigation

Pinchin retained Strata Drilling Group (Strata) to complete the borehole drilling program at the Site on

November 24, 2017 following the clearance of underground services in the vicinity of the work area by

public utility locators and a private utility locator retained by Pinchin. Strata is licensed by the MOECC in

accordance with Ontario Regulation 903 (as amended) to undertake borehole drilling/well installation

activities.

The boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 2.74 metres below ground surface (mbgs) using a

Geoprobe 7822 DT direct push drill rig. Soil samples were collected at continuous intervals using 5.7

centimetre (cm) outer diameter (OD) direct push soil samplers with dedicated single-use sample liners.

Discrete soil samples were collected from the single-use liners and containerized in laboratory-supplied

glass sampling jars.

Subsurface soil conditions were logged on-Site by Pinchin personnel at the time of drilling. Soil samples

were examined for visual and olfactory evidence of impacts and a portion of each sample was analyzed in

the field for volatile organic compounds and petroleum-derived vapour concentrations in soil headspace

using an RKI Eagle II with a combination photoionization detector (PID) and a hydrocarbon surveyor

operated in methane elimination mode.

The locations of the boreholes are shown on Figure 2 and a description of the subsurface stratigraphy

encountered during the drilling program is documented in the borehole logs included in Appendix II.



2.2 Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

2.2.1 Soil

One most apparent “worst case” soil sample, based on vapour concentrations as well as visual and/or

olfactory considerations, recovered from each borehole was submitted for laboratory analyses of PHCs

(F1-F4), BTEX, PAHs and metals.

The borehole locations are shown on Figure 2. Table 1 provides a summary of the soil samples submitted

for laboratory analysis.

2.2.2 Analytical Laboratory

Selected soil samples were delivered to Maxxam Analytics Inc. (Maxxam) in Mississauga, Ontario for

analysis. Maxxam is an independent laboratory accredited by the Standards Council of Canada and the

Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation. Formal chain of custody records of the sample

submissions were maintained between Pinchin and the staff at Maxxam.

2.3 QA/QC Protocols

Various quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) protocols were followed during the Limited Phase II

ESA to ensure that representative soil samples were obtained and that representative analytical data

were reported by the laboratory.

Field QA/QC protocols that were employed by Pinchin included the following:

• Soil samples were extracted from the interior of the sampling device (where possible),

rather than from areas in contact with the sampler walls to minimize the potential for

cross-contamination;

• Soil samples were placed in laboratory-supplied glass sample jars;

• Soil samples were placed in coolers on ice immediately upon collection, with appropriate

sample temperatures maintained prior to submission to the laboratory;

• Dedicated and disposable nitrile gloves were used for sample handling; and

• Sample collection and handling procedures were performed in general accordance with

the MOECC Sampling Guideline, the APGO Guideline and Pinchin’s SOPs for Phase II

ESAs.

Maxxam’s internal laboratory QA/QC consisted of the analysis of laboratory duplicate, method blank,

matrix spike and spiked blank samples, an evaluation of relative percent difference calculations for

laboratory duplicate samples, and an evaluation of surrogate recoveries.



2.4 Site Condition Standards

The Site is utilized as a park located in the City of Guelph. It is Pinchin’s understanding that potable water

for the Site and surrounding area is supplied by municipal groundwater supply wells. The Site is located

adjacent to the Speed River.

Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended) states that a Site is classified as an “environmentally sensitive

area” if the pH of the surface soil (less than 1.5 mbgs) is less than 5 or greater than 9, the pH of the

subsurface soil (greater than 1.5 mbgs) is less than 5 or greater than 11, or if the Site is an area of natural

significance or is adjacent to or contains land within 30 metres of an area of natural significance. Two

representative soil samples collected from the boreholes advanced at the Goldie Mills Ruins property as

part of the Phase II ESA were submitted for pH analysis. The pH values measured in the submitted soil

samples were within the limits for non-sensitive sites. The Site is also not an area of natural significance

and it is not adjacent to, nor does it contain land within 30 metres of, an area of natural significance. As

such, the Site is not an environmentally sensitive area.

One representative soil sample collected from the boreholes advanced at the Goldie Mills Ruins property

as part of the Phase II ESA was submitted for 75 micron single-sieve grain size analysis. Based on the

results of this analysis, the soil at the Site is interpreted to be coarse-textured for the purpose of selecting

the appropriate MOECC Standards.

The results of the borehole drilling program indicated that the overburden was less than two metres thick

over more than one-third of the Site area, classifying the Site as a “shallow soil property” as per Ontario

Regulation 153/04 (as amended).

Based on the above, the appropriate Site Condition Standards for the Site are:

Portion of the Site located greater than 30 m of the Speed River

• “Table 6: Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Soils in a Potable Ground Water

Condition”, provided in the MOECC Standards (Table 6 Standards) for:

• Coarse-textured soils; and

• Residential/parkland/institutional property use.

Portion of the Site located within 30 m of the Speed River

• The more conservative between the Table 6 Standards and the “Table 8: Generic Site

Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of Water Body in a Potable Ground Water

Condition”, provided in the MOECC Standards (Table 8 Standards) for:

• Coarse-textured soils; and

• Residential/parkland/institutional property use.



As such, the analytical results have been compared to these Table 6 and/or Table 8 Standards.

3.0 RESULTS

3.1 Site Geology and Hydrogeology

Based on the soil samples recovered during the borehole drilling program, the soil stratigraphy

encountered at the drilling locations below the grass surface generally consisted of fill material comprised

primarily of sand, sand and gravel and/or gravel with occasional silty sand units to a depth between

approximately 1.22 and 2.74 mbgs.

Native subsurface material underlying the fill material was observed to generally consist of limestone

bedrock, which was encountered at depths between 1.22 and 2.74 mbgs. Wet soil conditions were not

encountered during the borehole drilling activities.

A detailed description of the subsurface stratigraphy encountered during borehole advancement is

documented in the borehole logs located in Appendix II.

The Speed River is located adjacent to the northeast property boundary of the Site. The topography of

the Site and surrounding area were observed to slope towards the northeast. Groundwater flow at the

Site is inferred to be towards the northeast based on the topography of the Site area and the location of

the Speed River.

3.2 Soil Headspace Vapour Concentrations

Vapour concentrations measured in the headspace of soil samples collected during the drilling

investigation are presented on the borehole logs in Appendix II and were all between 0 and <5 parts per

million by volume (ppmv).

3.3 Field Observations

No odours or staining were observed in the soil samples collected during the borehole drilling program.

3.4 Analytical

3.4.1 Soil

As indicated in Tables 2 through 4, reported concentrations of PHCs (F1-F4), BTEX, PAHs and metals in

the soil samples submitted for analyses met the Table 6 Standards and/or the Table 8 Standards, with the

following exceptions:

• Soil sample B203-S1 collected from borehole BH203 located greater than 30 m from the

Speed River exceeded the Table 6 Standards for select PAH and metals parameters;




River exceeded the Table 8 Standards for select BTEX and PAH parameters, PHC F2

and copper; and


River exceeded the Table 8 Standards for select PAH and metals parameters.

The location of the above-noted soil exceedances are shown on Figure 3. The laboratory Certificate of

Analysis for the soil samples are provided in Appendix IV.

4.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on the work completed, the following is a summary of the activities and findings of this Limited

Phase II ESA:

• Pinchin retained Strata to advance nine boreholes at the Site on November 24, 2017.

The boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 2.74 mbgs using a Geoprobe 7822

DT direct push drill rig.

• The soil stratigraphy encountered at the drilling locations generally consisted of sand,

sand and gravel and/or gravel with occasional silty sand units fill material to a depth

between approximately 1.22 and 2.74 mbgs overlying native limestone bedrock that was

encountered at depths between 1.22 and 2.74 mbgs. Wet soil conditions were not

encountered during the borehole drilling activities.

• Inferred groundwater flow is expected to be northeast based on topography and the

location of the Speed River.

• Based on Site-specific information, the soil and groundwater quality was assessed based

on the Table 6 Standards and/or Table 8 Standards for residential/parkland/institutional

land use and coarse-textured soils.

• Nine “worst case” soil samples based on the results of field screening were submitted for

laboratory analyses of PHCs (F1-F4), BTEX, PAHs and metals.

• Reported concentrations in the soil samples submitted for analyses of PHCs (F1-F4),

BTEX, PAHs and metals satisfied their respective Table 6 Standards and/or Table 8

Standards, with the following exceptions:

• Soil sample B203-S1 collected from borehole BH203 located greater than 30 m

from the Speed River exceeded the Table 6 Standards for select PAH and

metals parameters;



• Soil sample B207-S2 collected from borehole BH207 located within 30 m of the

Speed River exceeded the Table 8 Standards for select BTEX and PAH

parameters, PHC F2 and copper; and

• Soil sample B208-S3 collected from borehole BH208 located within 30 m of the

Speed River exceeded the Table 8 Standards for select PAH and metals

parameters.

The findings of this Limited Phase II ESA identified PAH, metals, BTEX and/or PHC impacts within

shallow soil at boreholes BH203, BH207 and BH208, located within the central portion of the Site. The

concentrations of PAHs, metals, BTEX and PHCs detected in the shallow soil samples were generally

consistent or lower than the concentrations detected in the soil samples collected during the Phase II

ESA completed at 70 Norwich Street East. Pinchin infers that the metals and PAH impacts detected in

the shallow soil are attributed to the presence of poor quality fill material in this area. The BTEX and PHC

impacts were localized to the soil sample collected from borehole BH207 and could be attributed to an

isolated release/spill of a petroleum product in this area of the Site. Given that PHC and BTEX impacts

were not detected in the soil samples collected between borehole BH207 and borehole BH101, Pinchin

does not believe that the PHC and BTEX impacts detected in soil at borehole BH207 are related to the

former industrial operations conducted at 70 Norwich Street East. It is Pinchin’s recommendation that a

SLRA be completed for the Site or that the SLRA previously completed for the 70 Norwich Street East

property is expanded to include the Site.

5.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS

This Limited Phase II ESA was performed for City of Guelph (Client) in order to investigate potential

environmental impacts at Joseph Wolfond Park West in Guelph, Ontario (Site). The term recognized

environmental condition means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance on a

property under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release, or a material threat of a release

of a hazardous substance into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface

water of the property. This Limited Phase II ESA does not quantify the extent of the current and/or

recognized environmental condition or the cost of any remediation.

Conclusions derived are specific to the immediate area of study and cannot be extrapolated extensively

away from sample locations. Samples have been analyzed for a limited number of contaminants that are

expected to be present at the Site, and the absence of information relating to a specific contaminant does

not indicate that it is not present.



No environmental site assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized

environmental conditions on a property. Performance of this Limited Phase II ESA to the standards

established by Pinchin is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for

recognized environmental conditions on the Site, and recognizes reasonable limits on time and cost.

This Limited Phase II ESA was performed in general compliance with currently acceptable practices for

environmental site investigations, and specific Client requests, as applicable to this Site. The scope of

work completed by Pinchin, as part of this Limited Phase II ESA, is not sufficient (in and of itself) to meet

the requirements for the submission of a Record of Site Condition (RSC) in accordance with Ontario

Regulation 153/04 (as amended). If an RSC is an intended end product of work conducted at the Site,

further consultation and/or work will be required.

This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Client, subject to the terms, conditions and

limitations contained within the duly authorized proposal for this project. Any use which a third party

makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, is the sole responsibility of

such third parties. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of

decisions made or actions conducted.

If additional parties require reliance on this report, written authorization from Pinchin will be required.

Pinchin disclaims responsibility of consequential financial effects on transactions or property values, or

requirements for follow-up actions and costs. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Furthermore,

this report should not be construed as legal advice. Pinchin will not provide results or information to any

party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law.

Pinchin makes no other representations whatsoever, including those concerning the legal significance of

its findings, or as to other legal matters touched on in this report, including, but not limited to, ownership

of any property, or the application of any law to the facts set forth herein. With respect to regulatory

compliance issues, regulatory statutes are subject to interpretation and these interpretations may change

over time.

\\pinchin.com\wat\Job\214000s\0214399.000 CITYOFGUELPHJosephParkEDRSA2\Deliverables\214299 Limited Phase II ESA FINAL Report Wolfond Park West, Guelph, ON Dec 2017.docx

Template: Master Report for Phase II ESA - Stage 2 PSI, EDR, September 13, 2017

APPENDIX I Figures

APPENDIX II Borehole Logs

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Waterloo, ON N2J 4G8

283 Northfield Drive East

Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

BH201214399

Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

City of Guelph

Joseph Wolfond Park West, Guelph, Ontario

November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface

TopsoilDark brown, some organics, moist.

Sand (fill)Brown, moist.

Gravel (fill)Grey, some boulders and sand, moist.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.76

1.22

2.13

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1

2

60

30

BH201-S1

BH201-S2

BH201-S3

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

PHCs, BTEX, PAHs, Metals

Strata Drilling Group

Direct Push

NA

NM

NM

Soil vapour readings measured usingan RKI Eagle II with a combination photo-ionization detector (PID) and combustible gas indicator(CGI).

Sampler refusal on inferred limestone bedrock at 2.13 mbgs.


Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH202214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface

TopsoilDark brown, some oranics, moist.

Sand (fill)Light brown, moist.

Sand and Gravel (fill)Brown, moist. Sampler refusal on inferred limestone bedrock at 1.22 mbgs.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.30

1.07

1.22

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1 75

BH202-S1

BH202-S2

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM



Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH203214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface

Silty Sand (fill)Dark brown, some red brick and glass debris, moist.

Sand (fill)Brown, damp to moist. Sampler refusal on inferred limestone bedrock at 1.22 mbgs.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.30

1.07

1.22

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1 60

BH203-S1

BH203-S2

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM



Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH204214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface


Silty Sand (fill)Dark brown, moist.

Sand (fill)Brown, moist to wet.

Gravel (fill)Grey, some boulders and sand, moist.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.30

1.22

1.52

2.13

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1

2

75

30

BH204-S1

BH204-S2

BH204-S3

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM




Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH205214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface


Sand and Gravel (fill)Brown, moist.

Sand (fill)Dark brown, trace coal-like fragments and gravel, moist.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.30

0.61

2.13

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1

2

60

30

BH205-S1

BH205-S2

BH205-S3

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM



Turns to light brown at 1.22 mbgs.


Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

4

5

6

7

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH206214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface


Silty Sand (fill)Dark brown, moist.

Sand (fill)Brown, damp to moist. Sampler refusal on inferred limestone bedrock at 1.52 mbgs.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.15

1.07

1.52

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1 65

BH206-S1

BH206-S2

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM



Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH207214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface



Sand (fill)Light brown, fine grained, damp.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.15

1.68

2.74

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1

2

60

60

BH207-S1

BH207-S2

BH207-S3

BH207-S4

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM



Dark brown/black striations from 0.76 to 1.52 mbgs.


Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH208214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface


Sandy Silt (fill)Brown, trace glass, brick, ash and coal-like debris, moist


End of Borehole

0.00

0.30

1.52

2.74

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1

2

70

50

BH208-S1

BH208-S2

BH208-S3

BH208-S4

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0

<5 / 0



Direct Push

NA

NM

NM




Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:



Pinchin Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:


Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

Depth

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

4

5

6

7

Sym

bol Description

Measure

d

Depth

(m

)

Monito

ring

Well

Deta

ils

Sam

ple

r #

Recovery

(%

)

Sam

ple

ID

Soil

Vapour

Concentr

atio

n

CG

I/P

ID

Labora

tory

A

naly

sis


BH209214399


City of Guelph


November 24, 2017

TM

SS

Ground Surface


Sand (fill)Brown, damp to moist.

End of Borehole

0.00

0.30

1.52

No M

onito

ring W

ell

Insta

lled

1 65

BH209-S1

BH209-S2

<5 / 0

<5 / 0 PHCs, BTEX, PAHs, Metals


Direct Push

NA

NM

NM


Trace coal like fragments encountered from 1.22 to 1.52 mbgs. Sampler refusal on inferred limestone bedrock at 1.52 mbgs.

APPENDIX III Summary Tables

Borehole / Monitoring

Well IDSample

ID PH

Cs

(F

1-F

4)

&

BT

EX

PA

Hs

Me

tals

BH201 BH201-S2 ● ● ●

BH202 BH202-S1 ● ● ●

BH203 BH203-S1 ● ● ●

BH204 BH204-S1 ● ● ●

BH205 BH205-S2 ● ● ●

BH206 BH206-S1 ● ● ●

BH207 BH207-S2 ● ● ●

BH208 BH208-S3 ● ● ●

BH209 BH209-S2 ● ● ●Notes:

PHCs (F1-F4) Petroleum Hydrocarbons (F1 to F4 Fraction Ranges)BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and XylenesPAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbonsmbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

1.52 - 2.13

0.76 - 1.52

0.3 - 0.61

0.76 - 1.52

0.3 - 0.76

0.76 - 1.52

To assess subsurface soil quality in order to delineate the extent of PHC, BTEX, PAH and metal impacts in soil north of the Goldie Mills Ruins property.

TABLE 1SAMPLES SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY ANALYSES

City of GuelphJoseph Wolfond Park West, Guelph, Ontario

Samples

Sample Depth Range (mbgs)

Parameters

Rationale/Notes

0.76 - 1.52

0.3 - 0.76

0 - 0.61

SO

IL S

AM

PL

ES


BH201-S2 1 BH202-S1 1 BH203-S1 1 BH204-S1 1 BH205-S2 2 BH206-S1 1 BH207-S2 2 BH208-S3 2 B209-S2 2

24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/20170.76 - 1.52 0 - 0.61 0.3 - 0.61 0.3 - 0.76 0.76 - 1.52 0.3 - 0.76 0.76 - 1.52 1.52 - 2.13 0.76 - 1.52

0.21 0.02 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

2.3 0.2 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.33 0.03 <0.020

1.1 0.05 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.45 <0.020 <0.020

3.1 0.05 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 10 <0.040 <0.040

55 25 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

98 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 32 <10 <10

300 240 <50 <50 130 <50 <50 <50 160 62 <50

2,800 120 <50 <50 82 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

2,800 120 NA NA 380 NA NA NA NA NA NANotes:

MOECC Table 6 Standards*

MOECC Table 8 Standards**

Note 1Soil Samples compared to MOECC Table 6 Standards

Note 2Soil Samples compared to MOECC Table 6 and Table 8 Standards

BOLD Exceeds Site Condition Standard

BOLD Reportable Detection Limit Exceeds Site Condition Standard

Units All Units in μg/g

NA Not Analyzed

mbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 8 Standards, Property Within 30 Metres of a Waterbody, Coarse-Textured Soils, Potable Groundwater Condition, for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use.

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 (>C34 - C50)

F4G-sg (Grav. Heavy Hydrocarbons

TABLE 2PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON AND BTEX ANALYSES FOR SOIL


Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1 (C6 - C10)

Sample DesignationSample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

Sample Depth (mbgs)Parameter

Benzene

Toluene

Ethylbenzene

MOECCTable 8 Standards**

Xylenes (Total)

MOECCTable 6 Standards*

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 6 Standards, Shallow Soil Property, Coarse-Textured Soils, Potable Groundwater Condition, for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use.





24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/20170.76 - 1.52 0 - 0.61 0.3 - 0.61 0.3 - 0.76 0.76 - 1.52 0.3 - 0.76 0.76 - 1.52 1.52 - 2.13 0.76 - 1.52

7.9 0.072 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.12 <0.0050 0.0052 0.0089 0.092 0.034 <0.00500.15 0.093 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.15 <0.0050 0.011 0.011 0.014 0.03 <0.00500.67 0.22 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.39 <0.0050 0.02 0.028 0.2 0.26 0.00650.5 0.36 <0.0050 0.0054 1.4 <0.0050 0.079 0.13 0.65 1.1 0.0240.3 0.3 <0.0050 0.0076 1.4 <0.0050 0.075 0.13 0.55 1.2 0.025

0.78 0.47 <0.0050 0.011 1.9 <0.0050 0.12 0.18 0.73 1.4 0.0426.6 0.68 <0.0050 0.008 1 <0.0050 0.075 0.071 0.4 0.62 0.021

0.78 0.48 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.73 <0.0050 0.041 0.061 0.27 0.57 0.0147 2.8 <0.0050 0.0051 1.2 <0.0050 0.08 0.11 0.54 0.85 0.021

0.1 0.1 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.3 <0.0050 0.019 0.027 0.11 0.3 <0.00500.69 0.69 <0.0050 0.011 2.6 <0.0050 0.12 0.23 1.4 1.2 0.04362 0.19 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.17 <0.0050 0.007 0.008 0.095 0.055 <0.0050

0.38 0.23 <0.0050 0.0075 0.98 <0.0050 0.068 0.098 0.44 0.86 0.0190.99 0.59 <0.0071 <0.0071 0.15 <0.0071 0.082 0.014 0.11 0.029 <0.00710.6 0.09 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.077 <0.0050 0.028 0.0056 0.046 0.026 <0.00506.2 0.69 <0.0050 <0.0050 1.8 <0.0050 0.089 0.11 1 0.75 0.02278 1 <0.0050 0.0089 2.1 <0.0050 0.11 0.19 1.1 1 0.036

Notes:





BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardBOLD Reportable Detection Limit Exceeds Site Condition StandardUnits All Units in μg/gmbgs Metres Below Ground Surface



Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene


Phenanthrene

Acenaphthylene

Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene

AnthraceneBenzo(a)anthracene

Fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Pyrene

Methylnaphthalene, 2-(1-)

Benzo(ghi)peryleneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

TABLE 3POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS FOR SOIL


Acenaphthene

MOECCTable 6 Standards*


Sample Depth (mbgs)Parameter



24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/2017 24/11/20170.76 - 1.52 0 - 0.61 0.3 - 0.61 0.3 - 0.76 0.76 - 1.52 0.3 - 0.76 0.76 - 1.52 1.52 - 2.13 0.76 - 1.52

7.5 1.3 <0.20 <0.20 3.3 <0.20 1 0.41 0.61 5.6 <0.20

18 18 1 3 5.2 2.5 5.2 2.1 3.2 4.1 2.4

390 220 6.8 43 110 37 71 43 69 450 26

4 2.5 <0.20 0.49 0.35 0.32 0.39 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.22

120 36 <5.0 <5.0 5.7 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

1.2 1.2 0.12 0.26 2.1 0.39 0.2 0.32 0.55 0.51 0.36

160 70 4.1 20 19 9.9 12 8.4 16 15 9.2

22 22 1.6 5.8 4.6 3.4 7.3 2.3 3.3 2.7 3.5

140 92 4.9 8.3 66 12 18 16 100 150 10

120 120 6.7 18 610 15 82 54 65 1200 28

0.27 0.27 <0.050 <0.050 2.2 <0.050 0.16 0.077 0.06 0.73 <0.050

6.9 2 <0.50 0.52 1.4 0.53 1.7 <0.50 1.7 <0.50 <0.50

100 82 2.8 11 21 7.1 11 5.3 19 6.1 7.2

2.4 1.5 <0.50 <0.50 0.57 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

20 0.5 <0.20 <0.20 1 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 9.9 <0.20

1 1 <0.050 0.077 0.19 0.085 0.18 0.051 0.063 0.17 0.068

23 2.5 0.32 0.47 0.47 0.83 0.41 0.31 0.38 0.39 0.42

86 86 9.5 48 25 20 29 16 16 16 20

340 290 42 61 500 66 130 88 210 470 150

Notes:





BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardBOLD Reportable Detection Limit Exceeds Site Condition StandardUnits All Units in μg/gmbgs Metres Below Ground SurfaceNA Not Applicable



Nickel

Selenium

Silver

Thallium


Cobalt

Copper

Lead

Mercury

Molybdenum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

TABLE 4METALS ANALYSIS FOR SOIL


Uranium

ParameterMOECCTable 6

Standards*

Boron (Total)

Zinc


Sample Depth (mbgs)

Vanadium

Chromium

Cadmium


APPENDIX IV Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

MAXXAM JOB #: B7Q6329Received: 2017/11/24, 14:20

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Your Project #: 214399

Report Date: 2017/12/01Report #: R4884926

Version: 1 - Final

Attention:Stephen Spooner

Pinchin Ltd283 Northfield Dr. E.Unit #9Waterloo, ONN2J 4G8

Your C.O.C. #: 640651-01-01

70 NORWICH ST.Site Location:

Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 9

ReferenceLaboratory MethodDateAnalyzed

DateExtractedQuantityAnalyses

EPA 8270D mCAM SOP-003012017/11/30N/A9Methylnaphthalene Sum

CCME PHC-CWS mCAM SOP-003152017/11/29N/A9Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil (1)

CCME CWS mCAM SOP-003162017/11/292017/11/289Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil (2)

CCME PHC-CWS mCAM SOP-003162017/12/012017/12/011F4G (CCME Hydrocarbons Gravimetric)

EPA 6020B mCAM SOP-004472017/11/292017/11/285Strong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS

EPA 6020B mCAM SOP-004472017/11/302017/11/294Strong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS

Carter 2nd ed 51.2 mCAM SOP-004452017/11/29N/A9Moisture

EPA 8270D mCAM SOP-003182017/11/292017/11/282PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)

EPA 8270D mCAM SOP-003182017/11/302017/11/287PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)

Maxxam Analytics' laboratories are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for specific parameters on scopes of accreditation. Unless otherwise noted,procedures used by Maxxam are based upon recognized Provincial, Federal or US method compendia such as CCME, MDDELCC, EPA, APHA.

All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with procedures and practices ordinarily exercised by professionals in Maxxam’s profession usingaccepted testing methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures (except where otherwise agreed by the client and Maxxam in writing). Alldata is in statistical control and has met quality control and method performance criteria unless otherwise noted. All method blanks are reported: unlessindicated otherwise, associated sample data are not blank corrected.

Maxxam Analytics' liability is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressedor implied. Maxxam has been retained to provide analysis of samples provided by the Client using the testing methodology referenced in this report.Interpretation and use of test results are the sole responsibility of the Client and are not within the scope of services provided by Maxxam, unless otherwiseagreed in writing.

Solid sample results, except biota, are based on dry weight unless otherwise indicated. Organic analyses are not recovery corrected except for isotopedilution methods.Results relate to samples tested.This Certificate shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.

Remarks:

Reference Method suffix “m” indicates test methods incorporate validated modifications from specific reference methods to improve performance.

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Page 1 of 28

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca

MAXXAM JOB #: B7Q6329Received: 2017/11/24, 14:20

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Your Project #: 214399

Report Date: 2017/12/01Report #: R4884926

Version: 1 - Final

Attention:Stephen Spooner

Pinchin Ltd283 Northfield Dr. E.Unit #9Waterloo, ONN2J 4G8

Your C.O.C. #: 640651-01-01


(1) No lab extraction date is given for F1BTEX & VOC samples that are field preserved with methanol. Extraction date is the date sampled unless otherwise stated.(2) All CCME PHC results met required criteria unless otherwise stated in the report. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of thereference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following “Alberta Environment’sInterpretation of the Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Validation of Performance-Based Alternative Methods September2003”. Documentation is available upon request. Modifications from Reference Method for the Canada-wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil-Tier 1 Method:F2/F3/F4 data reported using validated cold solvent extraction instead of Soxhlet extraction.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.Antonella Brasil, Senior Project ManagerEmail: [email protected]# (905)817-5817==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total Cover Pages : 2Page 2 of 28


Maxxam Job #: B7Q6329Report Date: 2017/12/01

Pinchin LtdClient Project #: 214399


Sampler Initials: TM

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SOIL

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

52900781.03.99.89.8%Moisture

Inorganics

QC BatchRDLBH209-S2BH208-S3BH207-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 11:15

2017/11/24 11:00

2017/11/24 10:45

Sampling Date

FPZ308FPZ307FPZ306Maxxam ID



52900781.0131520171411%Moisture

Inorganics

QC BatchRDLBH206-S1BH205-S2BH204-S2BH203-S1BH202-S2BH201-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 10:30

2017/11/24 10:15

2017/11/24 10:00

2017/11/24 09:30

2017/11/24 09:15

2017/11/24 09:00

Sampling Date

FPZ305FPZ304FPZ303FPZ302FPZ301FPZ300Maxxam ID

Page 3 of 28






ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL)



52895420.050<0.0502.2<0.0505288216<0.050ug/gAcid Extractable Mercury (Hg)

52895425.06650061528821642ug/gAcid Extractable Zinc (Zn)

52895425.020254852882169.5ug/gAcid Extractable Vanadium (V)

52895420.0500.830.470.4752882160.32ug/gAcid Extractable Uranium (U)

52895420.0500.0850.190.0775288216<0.050ug/gAcid Extractable Thallium (Tl)

52895420.20<0.201.0<0.205288216<0.20ug/gAcid Extractable Silver (Ag)

52895420.50<0.500.57<0.505288216<0.50ug/gAcid Extractable Selenium (Se)

52895420.507.1211152882162.8ug/gAcid Extractable Nickel (Ni)

52895420.500.531.40.525288216<0.50ug/gAcid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)

52895421.0156101852882166.7ug/gAcid Extractable Lead (Pb)

52895420.5012668.352882164.9ug/gAcid Extractable Copper (Cu)

52895420.103.44.65.852882161.6ug/gAcid Extractable Cobalt (Co)

52895421.09.9192052882164.1ug/gAcid Extractable Chromium (Cr)

52895420.100.392.10.2652882160.12ug/gAcid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)

52895425.0<5.05.7<5.05288216<5.0ug/gAcid Extractable Boron (B)

52895420.200.320.350.495288216<0.20ug/gAcid Extractable Beryllium (Be)

52895420.50371104352882166.8ug/gAcid Extractable Barium (Ba)

52895421.02.55.23.052882161.0ug/gAcid Extractable Arsenic (As)

52895420.20<0.203.3<0.205288216<0.20ug/gAcid Extractable Antimony (Sb)

Metals

QC BatchRDLBH204-S2BH203-S1BH202-S2QC BatchBH201-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 10:00

2017/11/24 09:30

2017/11/24 09:15

2017/11/24 09:00

Sampling Date

FPZ303FPZ302FPZ301FPZ300Maxxam ID

Page 4 of 28






ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL)



52895420.050<0.05052882160.730.0600.0770.16ug/gAcid Extractable Mercury (Hg)

52895425.0150528821647021088130ug/gAcid Extractable Zinc (Zn)

52895425.020528821616161629ug/gAcid Extractable Vanadium (V)

52895420.0500.4252882160.390.380.310.41ug/gAcid Extractable Uranium (U)

52895420.0500.06852882160.170.0630.0510.18ug/gAcid Extractable Thallium (Tl)

52895420.20<0.2052882169.9<0.20<0.20<0.20ug/gAcid Extractable Silver (Ag)

52895420.50<0.505288216<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50ug/gAcid Extractable Selenium (Se)

52895420.507.252882166.1195.311ug/gAcid Extractable Nickel (Ni)

52895420.50<0.505288216<0.501.7<0.501.7ug/gAcid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)

52895421.02852882161200655482ug/gAcid Extractable Lead (Pb)

52895420.501052882161501001618ug/gAcid Extractable Copper (Cu)

52895420.103.552882162.73.32.37.3ug/gAcid Extractable Cobalt (Co)

52895421.09.2528821615168.412ug/gAcid Extractable Chromium (Cr)

52895420.100.3652882160.510.550.320.20ug/gAcid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)

52895425.0<5.05288216<5.0<5.0<5.0<5.0ug/gAcid Extractable Boron (B)

52895420.200.225288216<0.20<0.20<0.200.39ug/gAcid Extractable Beryllium (Be)

52895420.50265288216450694371ug/gAcid Extractable Barium (Ba)

52895421.02.452882164.13.22.15.2ug/gAcid Extractable Arsenic (As)

52895420.20<0.2052882165.60.610.411.0ug/gAcid Extractable Antimony (Sb)

Metals

QC BatchRDLBH209-S2QC BatchBH208-S3BH207-S2BH206-S1BH205-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 11:15

2017/11/24 11:00

2017/11/24 10:45

2017/11/24 10:30

2017/11/24 10:15

Sampling Date

FPZ308FPZ307FPZ306FPZ305FPZ304Maxxam ID

Page 5 of 28






SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (SOIL)



528816698107981179587%D8-Acenaphthylene

528816694102951119388%D14-Terphenyl (FS)

5288166991061001139993%D10-Anthracene

Surrogate Recovery (%)

52881660.00500.190.11<0.00502.10.0089<0.0050ug/gPyrene

52881660.00500.110.089<0.00501.8<0.0050<0.0050ug/gPhenanthrene

52881660.00500.00560.028<0.00500.077<0.0050<0.0050ug/gNaphthalene

52881660.00500.00690.042<0.00500.071<0.0050<0.0050ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene

52881660.00500.00700.039<0.00500.079<0.0050<0.0050ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene

52881660.00500.0980.068<0.00500.980.0075<0.0050ug/gIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

52881660.00500.00800.0070<0.00500.17<0.0050<0.0050ug/gFluorene

52881660.00500.230.12<0.00502.60.011<0.0050ug/gFluoranthene

52881660.00500.0270.019<0.00500.30<0.0050<0.0050ug/gDibenz(a,h)anthracene

52881660.00500.110.080<0.00501.20.0051<0.0050ug/gChrysene

52881660.00500.0610.041<0.00500.73<0.0050<0.0050ug/gBenzo(k)fluoranthene

52881660.00500.0710.075<0.00501.00.0080<0.0050ug/gBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

52881660.00500.180.12<0.00501.90.011<0.0050ug/gBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene

52881660.00500.130.075<0.00501.40.0076<0.0050ug/gBenzo(a)pyrene

52881660.00500.130.079<0.00501.40.0054<0.0050ug/gBenzo(a)anthracene

52881660.00500.0280.020<0.00500.39<0.0050<0.0050ug/gAnthracene

52881660.00500.0110.011<0.00500.15<0.0050<0.0050ug/gAcenaphthylene

52881660.00500.00890.0052<0.00500.12<0.0050<0.0050ug/gAcenaphthene

Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons

52856710.00710.0140.082<0.00710.15<0.0071<0.0071ug/gMethylnaphthalene, 2-(1-)

Calculated Parameters

QC BatchRDLBH206-S1BH205-S2BH204-S2BH203-S1BH202-S2BH201-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 10:30

2017/11/24 10:15

2017/11/24 10:00

2017/11/24 09:30

2017/11/24 09:15

2017/11/24 09:00

Sampling Date

FPZ305FPZ304FPZ303FPZ302FPZ301FPZ300Maxxam ID

Page 6 of 28






SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (SOIL)



5288166918788%D8-Acenaphthylene

5288166879188%D14-Terphenyl (FS)

5288166929091%D10-Anthracene


52881660.00500.0361.01.1ug/gPyrene

52881660.00500.0220.751.0ug/gPhenanthrene

52881660.0050<0.00500.0260.046ug/gNaphthalene

52881660.0050<0.00500.0150.046ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene

52881660.0050<0.00500.0130.060ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene

52881660.00500.0190.860.44ug/gIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

52881660.0050<0.00500.0550.095ug/gFluorene

52881660.00500.0431.21.4ug/gFluoranthene

52881660.0050<0.00500.300.11ug/gDibenz(a,h)anthracene

52881660.00500.0210.850.54ug/gChrysene

52881660.00500.0140.570.27ug/gBenzo(k)fluoranthene

52881660.00500.0210.620.40ug/gBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

52881660.00500.0421.40.73ug/gBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene

52881660.00500.0251.20.55ug/gBenzo(a)pyrene

52881660.00500.0241.10.65ug/gBenzo(a)anthracene

52881660.00500.00650.260.20ug/gAnthracene

52881660.0050<0.00500.0300.014ug/gAcenaphthylene

52881660.0050<0.00500.0340.092ug/gAcenaphthene

Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons

52856710.0071<0.00710.0290.11ug/gMethylnaphthalene, 2-(1-)

Calculated Parameters

QC BatchRDLBH209-S2BH208-S3BH207-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 11:15

2017/11/24 11:00

2017/11/24 10:45

Sampling Date


Page 7 of 28






PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (CCME)



52881539852881539897%o-Terphenyl

528766910152876699999%D4-1,2-Dichloroethane

52876699752876699195%D10-Ethylbenzene

52876699952876699998%4-Bromofluorobenzene

5287669100528766910099%1,4-Difluorobenzene


5288153No5288153YesYesug/gReached Baseline at C50

52881535082528815350<50<50ug/gF4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons)

528815350130528815350<50<50ug/gF3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons)

528815310<10528815310<10<10ug/gF2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons)

5294208100380ug/gF4G-sg (Grav. Heavy Hydrocarbons)

F2-F4 Hydrocarbons

528766910<10528766910<10<10ug/gF1 (C6-C10) - BTEX

528766910<10528766910<10<10ug/gF1 (C6-C10)

52876690.040<0.04052876690.040<0.040<0.040ug/gTotal Xylenes

52876690.040<0.04052876690.040<0.040<0.040ug/gp+m-Xylene

52876690.020<0.02052876690.020<0.020<0.020ug/go-Xylene

52876690.020<0.02052876690.020<0.020<0.020ug/gEthylbenzene

52876690.020<0.02052876690.020<0.020<0.020ug/gToluene

52876690.020<0.02052876690.020<0.020<0.020ug/gBenzene

BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons

QC BatchRDLBH203-S1QC BatchRDLBH202-S2BH201-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 09:30

2017/11/24 09:15

2017/11/24 09:00

Sampling Date


Page 8 of 28









528815398100100112100%o-Terphenyl


52876699093939594%D10-Ethylbenzene




5288153YesYesYesYesYesug/gReached Baseline at C50

528815350<50<50<50<50<50ug/gF4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons)

52881535062160<50<50<50ug/gF3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons)

528815310<1032<10<10<10ug/gF2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons)

F2-F4 Hydrocarbons

528766910<10<10<10<10<10ug/gF1 (C6-C10) - BTEX

528766910<1021<10<10<10ug/gF1 (C6-C10)

52876690.040<0.04010<0.040<0.040<0.040ug/gTotal Xylenes

52876690.040<0.0404.5<0.040<0.040<0.040ug/gp+m-Xylene

52876690.020<0.0205.9<0.020<0.020<0.020ug/go-Xylene

52876690.020<0.0200.45<0.020<0.020<0.020ug/gEthylbenzene

52876690.0200.0300.33<0.020<0.020<0.020ug/gToluene

52876690.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020ug/gBenzene


QC BatchRDLBH208-S3BH207-S2BH206-S1BH205-S2BH204-S2UNITS

640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 11:00

2017/11/24 10:45

2017/11/24 10:30

2017/11/24 10:15

2017/11/24 10:00

Sampling Date

FPZ307FPZ306FPZ305FPZ304FPZ303Maxxam ID

Page 9 of 28









528815398%o-Terphenyl


528766991%D10-Ethylbenzene




5288153Yesug/gReached Baseline at C50

528815350<50ug/gF4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons)



F2-F4 Hydrocarbons

528766910<10ug/gF1 (C6-C10) - BTEX

528766910<10ug/gF1 (C6-C10)

52876690.040<0.040ug/gTotal Xylenes

52876690.040<0.040ug/gp+m-Xylene

52876690.020<0.020ug/go-Xylene

52876690.020<0.020ug/gEthylbenzene

52876690.020<0.020ug/gToluene

52876690.020<0.020ug/gBenzene


QC BatchRDLBH209-S2UNITS

640651-01-01COC Number

2017/11/24 11:15

Sampling Date

FPZ308Maxxam ID

Page 10 of 28






TEST SUMMARY

AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description

Maxxam ID: FPZ300 Collected: 2017/11/24Sample ID: BH201-S2

Matrix: SoilShipped:

Received: 2017/11/24

Automated Statchk2017/11/30N/A5285671CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum

Ravinder Gaidhu2017/11/29N/A5287669HSGC/MSFDPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil

Zhiyue (Frank) Zhu2017/11/292017/11/285288153GC/FIDPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil

Daniel Teclu2017/11/292017/11/285288216ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS

Min Yang2017/11/29N/A5290078BALMoisture

Mitesh Raj2017/11/292017/11/285288166GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)


















Dhara Patel2017/12/012017/12/015294208BALF4G (CCME Hydrocarbons Gravimetric)














Page 11 of 28






TEST SUMMARY









































Page 12 of 28






TEST SUMMARY











Page 13 of 28






GENERAL COMMENTS

Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt

6.7°CPackage 1

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 14 of 28



Sampler Initials: TM70 NORWICH ST.Site Location:


QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT

QC LimitsValue (%)UNITSValueQC Limits% RecoveryQC Limits% RecoveryDateParameterQC Batch

RPDMethod BlankSPIKED BLANKMatrix Spike

%10160 - 14010060 - 1401002017/11/291,4-Difluorobenzene5287669

%10160 - 14010060 - 1401012017/11/294-Bromofluorobenzene5287669

%9560 - 1408760 - 1401022017/11/29D10-Ethylbenzene5287669

%9960 - 1409860 - 140992017/11/29D4-1,2-Dichloroethane5287669

%9960 - 1309460 - 130972017/11/28o-Terphenyl5288153

%9350 - 1309450 - 130922017/11/29D10-Anthracene5288166

%8850 - 1309050 - 130892017/11/29D14-Terphenyl (FS)5288166

%8250 - 1309050 - 130872017/11/29D8-Acenaphthylene5288166

50NCug/g<0.02060 - 14010060 - 1401052017/11/29Benzene5287669

50NCug/g<0.02060 - 1409660 - 1401012017/11/29Ethylbenzene5287669

30NCug/g<102017/11/29F1 (C6-C10) - BTEX5287669

30NCug/g<1080 - 1209660 - 1401072017/11/29F1 (C6-C10)5287669

50NCug/g<0.02060 - 1409760 - 1401032017/11/29o-Xylene5287669

50NCug/g<0.04060 - 1409460 - 140992017/11/29p+m-Xylene5287669

50NCug/g<0.02060 - 1409260 - 140992017/11/29Toluene5287669

50NCug/g<0.0402017/11/29Total Xylenes5287669

3027ug/g<1080 - 1209550 - 130972017/11/29F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons)5288153

30NCug/g<50080 - 1209050 - 130922017/11/29F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons)5288153

30NCug/g<5080 - 1208450 - 130892017/11/29F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons)5288153

4035ug/g<0.005050 - 13011550 - 1301122017/11/291-Methylnaphthalene5288166

4037ug/g<0.005050 - 13010650 - 1301042017/11/292-Methylnaphthalene5288166

40NCug/g<0.005050 - 13010350 - 1301012017/11/29Acenaphthene5288166

40NCug/g<0.005050 - 1309950 - 130972017/11/29Acenaphthylene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 1309450 - 130932017/11/29Anthracene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13011450 - 1301152017/11/29Benzo(a)anthracene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010950 - 1301072017/11/29Benzo(a)pyrene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010750 - 1301012017/11/29Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010450 - 130912017/11/29Benzo(g,h,i)perylene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010950 - 1301062017/11/29Benzo(k)fluoranthene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010650 - 1301042017/11/29Chrysene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13011250 - 1301062017/11/29Dibenz(a,h)anthracene5288166

Page 15 of 28





QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT(CONT'D)



ug/g<0.005050 - 13010650 - 1301032017/11/29Fluoranthene5288166

40NCug/g<0.005050 - 13010550 - 1301032017/11/29Fluorene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010850 - 130992017/11/29Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene5288166

4037ug/g<0.005050 - 1309750 - 130932017/11/29Naphthalene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010350 - 1301002017/11/29Phenanthrene5288166

ug/g<0.005050 - 13010550 - 1301022017/11/29Pyrene5288166

30NCug/g<0.2080 - 1209775 - 125892017/11/29Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb)5288216

30NCug/g<1.080 - 12010075 - 125992017/11/29Acid Extractable Arsenic (As)5288216

302.3ug/g<0.5080 - 1209875 - 125NC2017/11/29Acid Extractable Barium (Ba)5288216

302.8ug/g<0.2080 - 1209875 - 1251032017/11/29Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be)5288216

ug/g<5.080 - 1209875 - 1251022017/11/29Acid Extractable Boron (B)5288216

30NCug/g<0.1080 - 1209875 - 1251022017/11/29Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)5288216

304.5ug/g<1.080 - 1209875 - 1251092017/11/29Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr)5288216

308.9ug/g<0.1080 - 1209875 - 1251022017/11/29Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co)5288216

304.5ug/g<0.5080 - 12010275 - 125NC2017/11/29Acid Extractable Copper (Cu)5288216

302.5ug/g<1.080 - 1209775 - 125992017/11/29Acid Extractable Lead (Pb)5288216

ug/g<0.05080 - 1209775 - 1251002017/11/29Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg)5288216

300.53ug/g<0.5080 - 1209975 - 125982017/11/29Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)5288216

300.96ug/g<0.5080 - 12010275 - 125992017/11/29Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni)5288216

30NCug/g<0.5080 - 12010275 - 1251022017/11/29Acid Extractable Selenium (Se)5288216

30NCug/g<0.2080 - 1209975 - 1251022017/11/29Acid Extractable Silver (Ag)5288216

3010ug/g<0.05080 - 1209675 - 1251002017/11/29Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl)5288216

ug/g<0.05080 - 1209475 - 125972017/11/29Acid Extractable Uranium (U)5288216

301.3ug/g<5.080 - 1209875 - 125NC2017/11/29Acid Extractable Vanadium (V)5288216

307.3ug/g<5.080 - 12010175 - 125NC2017/11/29Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn)5288216

30NCug/g<0.2080 - 12010475 - 1251052017/11/30Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb)5289542

30NCug/g<1.080 - 12010575 - 1251032017/11/30Acid Extractable Arsenic (As)5289542

3010ug/g<0.5080 - 12010275 - 125962017/11/30Acid Extractable Barium (Ba)5289542

30NCug/g<0.2080 - 1209975 - 1251032017/11/30Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be)5289542

30NCug/g<5.080 - 1209975 - 1251012017/11/30Acid Extractable Boron (B)5289542

30NCug/g<0.1080 - 12010175 - 1251022017/11/30Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)5289542

Page 16 of 28





QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT(CONT'D)



3018ug/g<1.080 - 12010175 - 1251052017/11/30Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr)5289542

3012ug/g<0.1080 - 12010375 - 1251022017/11/30Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co)5289542

306.0ug/g<0.5080 - 12010575 - 125992017/11/30Acid Extractable Copper (Cu)5289542

306.0ug/g<1.080 - 12010175 - 1251012017/11/30Acid Extractable Lead (Pb)5289542

30NCug/g<0.05080 - 1209775 - 125972017/11/30Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg)5289542

30NCug/g<0.5080 - 12010075 - 1251022017/11/30Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)5289542

300.94ug/g<0.5080 - 12010175 - 1251032017/11/30Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni)5289542

30NCug/g<0.5080 - 12010175 - 1251032017/11/30Acid Extractable Selenium (Se)5289542

30NCug/g<0.2080 - 12010175 - 1251022017/11/30Acid Extractable Silver (Ag)5289542

30NCug/g<0.05080 - 1209975 - 1251002017/11/30Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl)5289542

3019ug/g<0.05080 - 1209875 - 125992017/11/30Acid Extractable Uranium (U)5289542

3013ug/g<5.080 - 12010475 - 1251022017/11/30Acid Extractable Vanadium (V)5289542

300.90ug/g<5.080 - 12010175 - 1251012017/11/30Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn)5289542

2002017/11/29Moisture5290078

509.5ug/g<10065 - 13510065 - 135NC2017/12/01F4G-sg (Grav. Heavy Hydrocarbons)5294208

NC (Duplicate RPD): The duplicate RPD was not calculated. The concentration in the sample and/or duplicate was too low to permit a reliable RPD calculation (absolute difference <= 2x RDL).

NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spike amount was too small to permit a reliablerecovery calculation (matrix spike concentration was less than the native sample concentration)

Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Page 17 of 28






VALIDATION SIGNATURE PAGE

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

Ewa Pranjic, M.Sc., C.Chem, Scientific Specialist

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 18 of 28


Maxxam Job #: B7Q6329Report Date: 2017/12/01Maxxam Sample: FPZ300

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil Chromatogram

Pinchin LtdClient Project #: 214399Project name: 70 NORWICH ST.Client ID: BH201-S2

Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation

or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory.

Page 20 of 28






Page 21 of 28






Page 22 of 28






Page 23 of 28






Page 24 of 28






Page 25 of 28






Page 26 of 28






Page 27 of 28






Page 28 of 28

final limited phase ii environmental site assessment · concentrations of pahs, ... using an rki...

Documents