FEMAGRANT PROGRAMS DIRECTORATE

Preparedness Grant Programs

Los Angeles, CA

June 14, 2012

State Homeland Security Program (SHSP)

Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Program

UASI Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)

Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)

Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)

Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)

Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak)

1

FY 2012 Grant Program Funding Summary

2

Program FY 2011 FY 2012 Delta ($) Delta (%)

Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) $662,622,100 $490,376,000 ($172,246,100) -26%

Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG)* $329,040,400 $339,500,000 $10,459,600 3%

State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) $526,874,100 $294,000,000 ($232,874,100) -44%

Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) $235,029,000 $97,500,000 ($137,529,000) -59%

Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) $200,079,000 $87,500,000 ($112,579,000) -56%

Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)* $54,890,000 $46,600,000 ($8,290,000) -15%

Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak) $22,214,456 $10,000,000 ($12,214,456) -55%

UASI Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) $18,962,000 $10,000,000 ($8,962,000) -47%

Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP) $10,000,000 $6,000,000 ($4,000,000) -40%

Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) $34,929,932 $0 ($34,929,932) -100%

Citizen Corps Program (CCP) $9,980,000 $0 ($9,980,000) -100%

Driver’s License Security Grant Program (DLSGP) $45,188,000 $0 ($45,188,000) -100%

Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant Program $14,601,740 $0 ($14,601,740) -100%

Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP) $14,101,736 $0 ($14,101,736) -100%

Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP) $7,745,544 $0 ($7,745,544) -100%

Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP) $4,990,000 $0 ($4,990,000) -100%

Total $2,191,248,008 $1,381,476,000 ($809,772,008) -37%

*EMPG and OPSG are not part of the $995M in FY 2012 discretionary funding

State Administrative Agency (SAA)

Each State and Territory has a gubernatorial-appointed contact responsible for managing all Grant Programs Directorate (GPD) funds and associated program requirements.

The California SAA is FEMA’s primary grantee for all grant programs, and is located in Sacramento under the California Emergency Management Agency (excludes Port, Transit and Tribal Homeland Security Grant Programs).

For more information:

www.fema.gov/government/grant/saa/index.shtm

3

FY 2012 Grant Programs

Homeland Security Grant Programs (HSGP) - Direct to the SAA

State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP)

Urban Areas Security Initiative Grant Program (UASI)

Operation Stonegarden Grant Program (OPSG)

Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)

Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP)– Direct to Tribal Governments

Infrastructure Protection Activities- Direct to the Grantee

Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)

Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)

Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) - Amtrak

Emergency Management Activities

Emergency Management Performance Grant Program (EMPG) – Direct to the SAA

4

FY 2012 California Grant Program Funding Summary

5

PROGRAM FY 2011 FY 2012 DeltaSHSGP $72,983,062 $43,503,883 -40.4%UASI $141,599,909 $102,586,570 -27.6%OPSG $10,326,313 TBD TBDNPSG $2,835,532 TBD TBD

THSGP $1,912,115 TBD TBD

EMPG $25,951,025 $26,853,993 3.5%Annual Total (excludes PSGP, TSGP & IPRGP) $262,974,474 TBD TBD

HSGP Grant Programs

State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP): Funding for States/Territories to support implementation of the State Homeland Security Strategies to address the identified planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to and recover from acts of terrorism and other catastrophic events.

Urban Area Security initiative (UASI): Funding for eligible UASIs to address planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high-threat, high-density Urban Areas, and assists them in building an enhanced and sustainable capacity to prevent, protect against, mitigate respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism.

2012 CA UASI’s: Bay Area UASILos Angeles/Long Beach UASI

Riverside UASI

Santa Ana/Anaheim UASI

San Diego UASI

6

FY 2012 HSGP Programs Overview

Grantees are encouraged to build and sustain core capabilities which will include a combination of organizational resources, equipment, training and exercises. Building new capabilities will only be a priority when those capabilities can be nationally deployed in support of overall national preparedness.

Priority focus on the Information Sharing Environment and Maturation of Fusion Centers

Period of Performance 24 months.

7

Allowable Funding Categories

Planning

Organization

Equipment

Training

Exercises

Maintenance & Sustainment

Critical Emergency Supplies

Construction and Renovation

Management and Administration

8

Allowable Equipment Categories

Grantees may purchase first responder equipment in the following categories (number of categories has increased every year):

9

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Detection Equipment Decontamination Equipment Interoperable Communications Equipment Terrorism Incident Prevention Equipment Explosive Device Mitigation and

Remediation Equipment Physical Security Enhancement Equipment Medical Supplies/Pharmaceuticals

CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles/

Aircraft/Watercraft CBRNE Search & Rescue Equipment CBRNE Reference Materials Agricultural Terrorism Prevention, Response

& Mitigation Cyber Security Intervention Equipment

Responder Knowledge Base

10Https://www.rkb.us

Authorized Equipment List (AEL)

11

UASI Non-Profit Security Grant (NPSG)

Program Overview:

Provides funding support for target hardening activities to nonprofit organizations (as described under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code) that are at high-risk of international terrorist attack

Each Nonprofit must apply through their SAA for an award up to $75,000

The Grant program is designed to promote coordination and collaboration of emergency preparedness activities between public and private community representatives, state and local government agencies, and Citizen Corps Councils

12

NPSG Eligible Applicants

Nonprofit organizations that are at a high-risk of terrorist attack and located within one of the eligible Urban Areas nationwide.

Criteria for determining eligible applicants who are at high-risk of terrorist attack includes, but is not limited to:

Identification and substantiation (e.g. police reports or insurance claims) of prior threats or attacks (within or outside the U.S.) by a terrorist organization, network, or cell against the nonprofit organization.

Symbolic value of the site(s) as a highly recognized national or historical institution that renders the site a possible target of terrorism.

Role of the applicant nonprofit organization in responding to or recovering from terrorist attacks.

Findings from previously conducted risk assessments including threat or vulnerability.

13

NPGP Funding Availability Overview and Allocation Costs

Funding Availability Overview

Provides $10,000,000 to high-risk nonprofit organizations in the U.S.

Nonprofits located within designated UASI areas are eligible to receive a grant award up to $75,000.

Allowable Costs

Equipment: Allowable costs are focused on target hardening activities. Therefore, funding may be used to support two categories of items on the Authorized Equipment List (AEL):

Physical Security Enhancement Equipment (category 14)

Inspection and Screening Systems (category 15)

***Refer to the Responder Knowledge Base (RKB) Filter results for NSGP Grant***

Training: Funds may support nonprofit organization security personnel to attend security-related training courses and programs.

Allowable training topics are limited to the protection of Critical Infrastructure/Key Resources, including physical and cyber security, target hardening, and terrorism awareness/employee preparedness.

Grant Performance Period: Sub-grantees have 24 months to use grant money.

14

NSGP Review Process

NSGP is a competitive program and has a 2 phase review process:

1. Initial State Review: The SAA reviews all applications based on established criteria. Eligible applications are then scored and ranked and submitted to FEMA.

2. Federal Review: A panel of Federal reviewers will review and score each application. The sum of each applicant’s State and Federal score will be multiplied by a factor. All final scores will be placed in descending order and awardees will be selected from highest to lowest until funding is exhausted.

15

Operation Stonegarden Grant Program (OPSG)

Program Award: FY 2012 OPSG Grant Program is $46,600,000

Eligible Applicants:

Local units of government at the county level or equivalent and Federally-recognized tribal governments in the 39 States and territories bordering Canada (including Alaska), southern States bordering Mexico, and States and territories with International water borders.

Allowable Costs:

Operational Overtime associated with law enforcement activities for increased border security

Border Protection Vehicles to increase operational activities/patrols on U.S. border and along routes of ingress from international water borders.

Boats/Trailers to support international water border security operations in conjunction with approved Operations.

16

Transportation Infrastructure Security Branch (TISB)

17

TISB

Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)

Freight Rail Security Program (FRSGP)*

Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) – Amtrak

Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP)*

Trucking Security Program (TSP)*

Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)

* Program not funded in FY 2012

FY 2010-2011 TISB Grant Program Funding to California

18

Program FY 2010 FY 2011 Delta (%)

TSGP California $34,895,930 $28,725,355 -17.68%

Total TSGP $253,437,597 $200,079,000 -21.05%

PSGP California $55,304,804 $45,591,618 -17.56%Total PSGP $288,000,000 $235,029,000 -18.39%

Total California Funding $90,200,734 $74,316,973 -17.61%

Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)

19

Program Overview FY 2011 FY 2012

Purpose: PSGP provides funds for transportation infrastructure security activities to implement Area Maritime Transportation Security Plans and facility security plans among port authorities, facility operators, and State and local government agencies required to provide port security services.

Eligibility: Seven port areas have been selected as Group I (highest risk) and forty-eight port areas have been selected as Group II. Eligible ports not identified in Group I, II, or III are eligible to apply in the “All Other Port Areas” Group.

$235,029,000 $97,500,000

FY 2007 • Tier system implemented

FY 2007 Supp • Fiduciary Agent process implemented for Tier I and Tier II port areas

FY 2009• Cost share requirement can be met by cash or in-kind match• Some types of construction and renovation projects allowable for funding

ARRA• All applicants applied directly to FEMA for funding without the use of Fiduciary Agents• Cost share requirement eliminated

FY 2010 • No designated Ferry allocation

FY 2011• Group I and II port areas required to submit all Investment Justification prior to the application deadline• A new vulnerability component was added to the PSGP risk formula

FY 2012

• Fiduciary Agent process will not be utilized; All eligible applicants apply directly to FEMA for funding• Expanded allowable operational costs • Cost share requirement reinstated • For all FY 2012 awards the period of performance is 24 months

FY 2012 PSGP Risk Formula

20

PSGP Risk

Threat

(30%)

(DHS I&A)

Consequence

(50%)

Maritime Infrastructure

(MSRAM)

(USCG)

Domestic

Cargo Volume

International Cargo Volume

Container Cargo Volume

International Cargo Value

Petroleum Deliveries

Vulnerability

(20%)X X

Census

Commuters

Visitors

Ferry Passengers

Cruise Ship Passengers

Foreign Vessel Calls

Vulnerability Index

(20%)

HAZMAT Population

HAZMAT Volume

Population

X

Population Index (2%)

Economic Index (18%)

+

+

5- Mile Population

Naval

Presence

Naval

Priority

Military Personnel

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ ++ National Infrastructure Index

(20%)

National Security Index

(10%)

+

For Official Use Only (FOUO)

FY 2012 PSGP Priorities

Enhancing Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA)

Port areas should seek to enhance MDA through projects that address knowledge capabilities within the maritime domain

Projects should reflect a regionalized approach and coordinated effort among public and private sector organizations

MDA efforts could include access control/standardized credentialing, communications, enhanced intelligence sharing and analysis, construction and/or enhancement of Interagency Operations Centers, etc.

Enhancing Improvised Explosive Device (IED) and Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosive (CBRNE) prevention, protection, response, and recovery capabilities

Port areas should continue to enhance their capabilities to prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from attacks employing IEDs, CBRNE devices, and other nonconventional weapons

IEDs delivered via small craft, underwater swimmers, or on ferries are of particular concern

21

FY 2012 PSGP Priorities

Port Resilience and Recovery Capabilities

Ensuring resilience to disasters is one of the core DHS missions

PSGP funds are intended to enable continuity of operations and/or rapid recovery of the port in the event of a disaster

Ports that have not already done so are encouraged to develop a Business Continuity/Resumption of Trade Plan

Training and Exercises

Exercises must follow the Area Maritime Security Training Exercise Program (AMSTEP) or the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Intermodal Security Training Exercise Program (I-STEP) guidelines

Equipment Associated with Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Implementation

Infrastructure and installation projects that support TWIC implementation will be given a higher

22

PSGP Partners

FEMA designs and operates the administrative mechanisms to implement and manage the PSGP. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) provides programmatic subject matter expertise for the maritime industry; coordinates intelligence information and risk/vulnerability assessments to rank and rate critical infrastructure and key resources nationwide; and defines parameters for identifying, protecting, deterring, responding, and recovering from terrorist attacks

23

PSGP Review Process

PSGP has competitive and non-competitive, as well as local and Federal components to its three review processes

1. Initial Review: FEMA conducts an initial review of all PSGP applications for completion. Applications passing this review are grouped by port area and provided to the applicable Captain of the Port (COTP) for further review

2. Field Review: Field-level reviews are managed by the COTP in coordination with Maritime Administration (MARAD) and Area Maritime Security Committees (AMSC). Field Reviewers may be Federal, State, and local personnel who advise the COTP as local area subject matter experts; they complete Field Review Forms for each project with scores, prioritization, and supporting comments/justification

3. National Review: The National Review Panel (NRP) convenes to review each project and develop a final list of recommend funding. The NRP consists of Federal representatives from FEMA, USCG, MARAD, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), and Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP). A risk-based algorithm is applied to the NRP’s validated, prioritized list for each port area in all groups

24

Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)

25

Program Overview FY 2011 FY 2012

Purpose: TSGP provides funds to owners and operators of transit systems to protect critical surface transportation infrastructure and the traveling public from acts of terrorism, major disasters, and other emergencies.

Eligibility: Eligible transit agencies are determined based on daily unlinked passenger trips (ridership) and transit systems that serve historically eligible UASI jurisdictions.

$200,079,000 $87,500,000

FY 2007• All funding was awarded through the SAA• Supplemental funding was awarded, via the FY 2007 Supplemental TSGP

FY 2008 • Law enforcement agencies were allowed to be sub-grantees

FY 2009 • All funding was awarded directly to Transit Agencies

ARRA • There were no Tier’s and all applications were fully competitive

FY 2010• The minimum project cost amount was eliminated per stakeholder feedback for TSGP• Operational Package (OPack) period of performance was extended from 30 months to 36 months

FY 2011

• The TSGP period of performance was extended from 36 months to 48 months for Capital projects and will remain 36 months for Operational projects

• The application and review process was made fully competitive and Tiers were been eliminated. • Top Transit Asset List (TTAL) was developed and projects on the list have been funded

FY 2012• To be consistent SHSP, UASI, and PSGP methodologies, TSGP risk formula adds a new vulnerability

component.  This was formulated in conjunction with TSA’s analysis of vulnerable transit areas. • For all FY 2012 awards the period of performance is 24 months

FY 2012 TSGP Risk Formula

26

Bus(5%)+Rail

(95%)

Vulnerability (20%)

Consequence (50%)

+

National Infrastructure

Index (25%)

APTA Passenger

Trips

Underground Track Miles

Threat (30%)

Vulnerability (20%)

Consequence (50%)

+

Population Index (50%)

APTA Passenger

Trips

Threat (30%)

Transit Risk

BASE Assessment

(10%)

TTAL Count(10%)

Population Index (25%)

BASE Assessment

(10%)

TTAL Count(10%)

x x xx

+

For Official Use Only (FOUO)

FY 2012 TSGP Priorities

Operational Activities

Training (basic before follow-on)

Drills and Exercises

Vulnerability Assessments and Security Plans

Public Awareness Campaigns

TTAL Remediation

Assets that have complete remediation plans, anti-terrorism security enhancement measures, including security projects that provide for substantial security enhancements, such as intrusion detection, visual surveillance with live monitoring, alarms tied to visual surveillance system, recognition software, tunnel ventilation and drainage system protection, flood gates and plugs, portal lighting, and similar hardening actions for assets on the TTAL.

27

FY 2012 TSGP Priorities

Operational Packages

Canine Teams

Mobile Explosive Screening Teams

Anti-Terrorism Teams

Directed Patrols on Overtime

Other Capital Security Projects

Capital projects that do not fall under the above categories will be considered based on Project Groups.

28

TSGP Partners

FEMA is responsible for designing and operating the administrative mechanisms needed to implement and manage the grant program. 

TSA provides programmatic subject matter expertise for the transportation industry and assists by coordinating the myriad of intelligence information and risk/vulnerability assessments resulting in ranking and rating rail and mass transit assets.

These two agencies with assistance and cooperation of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), for rail and mass transit systems, and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), as needed for freight rail operations, determine the primary security architecture of the TSGP.

29

TSGP Review Process

TSGP is a competitive program and has Federal components involved in its review process:

1. Initial Review: FEMA conducts an initial review of all TSGP applications for completion.

2. National Review: The NRP convenes to review each project and develop a final list of recommend funding. The NRP consists of Federal representatives from FEMA, FTA, Department of Homeland Security Infrastructure Protection (DHS IP), and TSA.

30

Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR)

31

Program Overview FY 2011 FY 2012

Purpose: The IPR program is part of the infrastructure protection activities Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) and it creates a sustainable, risk-based effort to protect critical surface transportation infrastructure and the traveling public from acts of terrorism, major disasters, and other emergencies within the Amtrak rail system.

Eligibility: The National Passenger Railroad Corporation (Amtrak) is the only entity eligible to apply for funding under FY 2012 IPR.

$22,214,456 $10,000,000

FY 2007 Supp. • Amtrak was awarded funds through the FY 2007 TSGP Supplemental

FY 2009 • Amtrak award funding transferred to Department of Transportation (DOT) for disbursement

FY 2009 ARRA • Amtrak was awarded funds through the FY 2009 ARRA TSGP

FY 2010 • Maintenance and Sustainment projects were eligible for grant funding• No minimum project amount

FY 2012 • No significant changes• For all FY 2012 awards the period of performance is 24 months

FY 2012 IPR Priorities

Protection of high risk/high consequence underwater and underground rail assets

Measures that protect assets on the TTAL

Use of visible, unpredictable deterrence

Visible and unpredictable security activities enhance security awareness in the riding public, and help prevent attacks by disrupting the ability of terrorists to prepare for and execute attacks.

Planning

Vulnerability assessments, security plans, continuity of operations plans and risk mitigation plans

Targeted counter-terrorism training for key front line staff

Emergency preparedness drills and exercises

Public awareness and preparedness campaigns

32

FY 2012 IPR Priorities

Protection of other high risk, high consequence areas or systems that have been identified through system wide risk assessments.

Development and enhancement of capabilities to prevent, protect against, and respond to terrorist attacks employing CBRNE weapons, IEDs and cyber system disruptions

Other

Security projects in line with, or addressing one or more of the 22 permitted uses of funds outlined in Sec. 1513 of the 9/11 Act

33

IPR Partners

FEMA is responsible for designing and operating the administrative mechanisms needed to implement and programmatically manage the grant program.  TSA provides subject matter expertise for the transportation industry and assists by coordinating the myriad of intelligence information and risk/vulnerability assessments resulting in ranking and rating rail and mass transit assets nationwide against threats associated with potential terrorist attacks and in defining the parameters for identifying, protecting, deterring, responding, and recovering from such incidents.

34

IPR Review Process

IPR is a non-competitive program and has Federal components involved in its review process:

1. Initial Review: FEMA conducts an initial review of IPR application

2. National Review: FEMA, TSA and Amtrak convene to review each proposed project and develop a final list of approved projects

35

Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program

36

Program Overview FY 2012 Funding

Purpose: To enhance the ability of first responders to protect the health and safety of the public from fire and related hazards.

Eligibility: Fire Departments and Nonaffiliated EMS Authorizing Authority for Program: AFG is derived from the Federal Fire Prevention and

Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. §§ 2229 et seq.), as amended Re-Appropriation Authority for Program: Department of Defense and Full Year Continuing

Appropriations Act, 2011 (Public Law 112-74, Section 2, Division B, Title VI Homeland Security) Program Areas: Up to three separate funding applications may be submitted by a single

department. Categories include the following: Operations and Safety Vehicle Acquisition Regional Projects

$285,000,000

Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants (SAFER)

37

Program Overview FY 2012 Funding

Purpose: Provide financial assistance directly to fire departments and volunteer firefighter interest organizations in order to help increase or maintain the number of trained, "front line" firefighters available in their communities through the hiring of new firefighters, rehiring firefighters that have been laid off, retaining firefighters facing imminent layoffs, and/or filling of positions that were vacated through attrition.

Goal: Assist fire departments with staffing and deployment capabilities so they may respond to emergencies and assure communities have adequate protection from fire and fire-related hazards.

Eligibility: Hiring Category

Career Fire Departments, Combination Fire Departments, and Volunteer Fire Departments

Recruitment and Retention of Volunteer Firefighters Category Volunteer Fire Departments Combination Fire Departments State and local organizations with an interest in

volunteer firefighters

$320,000,000

Fire Prevention and Safety and Firefighter Research and Development Grants (FP&S)

38

Program Overview FY 2012 Funding

Eligibility: Fire departments and nonprofit organizations that have experience and expertise in fire prevention programs can apply under the Fire Prevention and Safety Activity. Fire departments are not eligible to apply under the Research and Development Activity.

Eligible Funding Categories: General Education/Awareness Code Enforcement/Awareness Fire and Arson Investigation National/State/Regional Programs and Studies

Examples of Eligible Projects: General prevention/awareness Smoke alarm installation Juvenile fire setter projects Sprinkler awareness Public education Code enforcement/awareness Fire and arson investigation

$35,000,000

Contacts and References

SAA – California Emergency Management Agency

(916) 845-8510

FY 2012 Preparedness Grant Programs

www.fema.gov/grants

39

QUESTIONS?

40