federal rico violations & ma legislation concerns exposed in federal foreclosure case

17
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case Boston, MA, September 29, 2015 Official complaints are now filed with the United States Inspector General/DOJ, and the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission, exposing details of evidenced Collusion (alleged) associated with the Federal Foreclosure Case Harihar vs. US Bank, et al., Docket No: 15-cv-11880. Parties include the retained counsel (current & Prior) for Defendants Wells Fargo & US Bank, the Massachusetts Attorney Generals Office, the US Attorneys Office, and the Boston BAR Association: 1. “The Plaintiff’s discovery of evidenced improper relationships involving the Defendant’s Counsel (current and prior) 1 , the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, and the Boston BAR Association. 2. The Plaintiff has clear reason to suspect, that these improper relationships show cause as to why criminal complaints related to this civil action are being ignored by state and federal prosecutors. 3. These allegations are believed to be part of a greater scheme, and are viewed as acts of COLLUSION and Federal violations of the RICO ACT, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS. 2 4. Per the direction of the Court, the plaintiff has now filed, On September, 24, 2015 two complaints via the Executive Branch of Government, to address these very serious and sensitive developments. 3 The second discovery of considerable concern involves a Massachusetts proposed Bill - S 1981, “CLEARING OF TITLE TO CERTAIN FORECLOSED PROPERTIES”, On September 17, 2015, the Massachusetts State Senate, in a vote of 31 7, passed a proposed bill that would restrict homeowners to 3 years (down from 20 years) to sue the responsible lender in order to regain their home after illegal foreclosure. This significant effort by Massachusetts State legislators to push through this legislation raises a number of immediate concerns to this Plaintiff: 1. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has clearly acknowledged that an illegal foreclosure and foreclosure sale has taken place involving the Plaintiff’s home, located at 168 Parkview avenue, Lowell, MA 01852. This has additionally been confirmed by both the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office, and Federal Bank Regulators. 2. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts acknowledges that CLEAR TITLE DOES NOT EXIST with the Plaintiff’s referenced foreclosure. 1 Current counsel (K&L Gates LLP, specifically Jeffrey S. Patterson, co-counsel to David E. Fialkow); Prior counsel (Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP). 2 Scroll down to view the West LegalEd Center course entitled, “After the Bubble Bursts” Mortgage and Foreclosure issues in Criminal and Civil Litigation. 3 Complaints are filed with the Office of the Inspector General - U.S. Department of Justice, and the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

Upload: mohan-harihar

Post on 08-Dec-2015

265 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case Boston, MA, September 29, 2015 – Official complaints are now filed with the United States Inspector General/DOJ, and the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission, exposing details of evidenced Collusion (alleged) associated with the Federal Foreclosure Case – Harihar vs. US Bank, et al., Docket No: 15-cv-11880. Parties include the retained counsel (current & Prior) for Defendants – Wells Fargo & US Bank, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, and the Boston BAR Association:

1. “The Plaintiff’s discovery of evidenced improper relationships involving the Defendant’s Counsel (current and prior)

1, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s

Office, and the Boston BAR Association. 2. The Plaintiff has clear reason to suspect, that these improper relationships show cause as to

why criminal complaints related to this civil action are being ignored by state and federal prosecutors.

3. These allegations are believed to be part of a greater scheme, and are viewed as acts of COLLUSION and Federal violations of the RICO ACT, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS.

2

4. Per the direction of the Court, the plaintiff has now filed, On September, 24, 2015 two complaints via the Executive Branch of Government, to address these very serious and sensitive developments.

3

The second discovery of considerable concern involves a Massachusetts proposed Bill - S 1981, “CLEARING OF TITLE TO CERTAIN FORECLOSED PROPERTIES”, On September 17, 2015, the Massachusetts State Senate, in a vote of 31 – 7, passed a proposed bill that would restrict homeowners to 3 years (down from 20 years) to sue the responsible lender in order to regain their home after illegal foreclosure. This significant effort by Massachusetts State legislators to push through this legislation raises a number of immediate concerns to this Plaintiff:

1. “The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has clearly acknowledged that an illegal foreclosure and foreclosure sale has taken place involving the Plaintiff’s home, located at 168 Parkview avenue, Lowell, MA 01852. This has additionally been confirmed by both the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office, and Federal Bank Regulators.

2. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts acknowledges that CLEAR TITLE DOES NOT EXIST with the Plaintiff’s referenced foreclosure.

1 Current counsel (K&L Gates LLP, specifically Jeffrey S. Patterson, co-counsel to David E.

Fialkow); Prior counsel (Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP). 2 Scroll down to view the West LegalEd Center course entitled, “After the Bubble Bursts” –

Mortgage and Foreclosure issues in Criminal and Civil Litigation. 3 Complaints are filed with the Office of the Inspector General - U.S. Department of Justice, and the

Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

Page 2: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

2

3. Despite over-communicating these supporting facts to Massachusetts State Courts for over four (4) years, no corrective action has been taken, and no articulation of a decision has been given, even when clarification has historically been requested.

4. There is an even greater concern now for ANY Massachusetts homeowner attempting to bring suit against a lender for illegal foreclosure. This Plaintiff has provided Massachusetts State Courts overwhelming supporting evidence for over four years, and NO corrective action is being taken. It does not seem to matter if the statute of limitations is twenty (20) years or one (1) year. It appears clear to this Plaintiff, that the Commonwealth has no intention to correct the illegal conduct that has harmed so many.

a. With the Commonwealth’s effort to pass legislation to clear title, the Attorney General has been using social media to communicate this effort, specifically via TWITTER. In the same timeframe, for reasons unknown, Attorney General Maura Healey has blocked this Plaintiff from viewing these efforts on the Mass.gov Attorney General Twitter page.

4

As time goes on, the depth of misconduct continues to be revealed. Adding to the disappointment, are state officials and legislators who have been regularly updated in this matter for over four (4) years, and have remained completely silent, while attempting to boast of their accomplishments related to the foreclosure crisis. Your silence and inaction here is considered shameful, and a disgrace to the Office in which you serve. It will now be revealed in the Public’s interest. Scroll down to view Plaintiff’s Motion in its entirety, filed with the US District Court on Friday, September 25

th, 2015.

For Further Media Information Contact: Mohan A. Harihar Email: [email protected] Phone: 617.921.2526 (Mobile) Follow on Twitter: Mohan Harihar@MH_Foreclosur1

4 Scroll down to view a photo of Plaintiff’s cell phone, and failed attempts to access the Twitter page

of Attorney General Maura Healey.

Page 3: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

3

Page 4: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

4

Page 5: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

MOHAN A. HARIHAR CIVIL ACTION NO: 2015-cv-

11880

Plaintiff

v.

US BANK NA, et al.

Defendants

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION REQUESTING SECOND TIMELINE EXTENSION TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; PROPOSED BILL, S 1981

The Plaintiff, Mohan A. Harihar, respectfully files with the

Court, this request for a second timeline extension to file a

second amended complaint, taking into consideration the

following factors:

2. The Plaintiff’s discovery of evidenced improper

relationships involving the Defendant’s Counsel (current

and prior)5, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office,

the US Attorney’s Office, and the Boston BAR Association.

3. The Plaintiff has clear reason to suspect, that these

improper relationships show cause as to why criminal

5 Current counsel (K&L Gates LLP, specifically Jeffrey S.

Patterson, co-counsel to David E. Fialkow); Prior counsel

(Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP).

Page 6: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

6

complaints related to this civil action are being ignored

by state and federal prosecutors.

4. These allegations are believed to be part of a greater

scheme, and are viewed as acts of COLLUSION and Federal

violations of the RICO ACT, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 -

RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS.

5. Per the direction of the Court, the plaintiff has now

filed, On September, 24, 2015 two complaints via the

Executive Branch of Government, to address these very

serious and sensitive developments.6 Copies of the

submissions are attached for reference.7

6. With the allegations surrounding the Plaintiffs’

Intellectual Property, and the threat to trillions of

dollars in US economic growth, a request for Whistleblower

Protection has been requested through the Department of

Justice.

7. Proposed Bill S 1981, “CLEARING OF TITLE TO CERTAIN

FORECLOSED PROPERTIES” – On September 17, 2015, the

Massachusetts State Senate, in a vote of 31 – 7, passed a

proposed bill that would restrict homeowners to 3 years

(down from 20 years) to sue the responsible lender in

6 Complaints are filed with the Office of the Inspector General

- U.S. Department of Justice, and the Deputy Chief of

Investigations within the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission 7 See Attachment A

Page 7: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

7

order to regain their home after illegal foreclosure. This

significant effort by Massachusetts State legislators to

push through this legislation raises a number of immediate

concerns to this Plaintiff:

a. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has clearly

acknowledged that an illegal foreclosure and

foreclosure sale has taken place involving the

Plaintiff’s home, located at 168 Parkview avenue,

Lowell, MA 01852. This has additionally been

confirmed by both the Massachusetts Attorney

General’s Office, and Federal Bank Regulators.

b. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts acknowledges that

CLEAR TITLE DOES NOT EXIST with the Plaintiff’s

referenced foreclosure.

c. Despite over-communicating these supporting facts to

Massachusetts State Courts for over four (4) years,

no corrective action has been taken, and no

articulation of a decision has been given, even when

clarification has historically been requested.

d. There is an even greater concern now for ANY

Massachusetts homeowner attempting to bring suit

against a lender for illegal foreclosure. This

Plaintiff has provided Massachusetts State Courts

overwhelming supporting evidence for over four years,

Page 8: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

8

and NO corrective action is being taken. It does not

seem to matter if the statute of limitations is

twenty (20) years or one (1) year. It appears clear

to this Plaintiff, that the Commonwealth has no

intention to correct the illegal conduct that has

harmed so many.

e. With the Commonwealth’s effort to pass legislation to

clear title, the Attorney General has been using

social media to communicate this effort, specifically

via TWITTER. In the same timeframe, for reasons

unknown, Attorney General Maura Healey has blocked

this Plaintiff from viewing these efforts on the

Mass.gov Attorney General Twitter page.8

f. The Plaintiff respectfully brings a direct question

before this Court – “Why am I not able to live in my

home right now?” The Plaintiff is still homeless, and

clearly should not be. Right now, the Plaintiff is

desperately trying to secure housing, and is close to

signing a lease on an apartment. The Plaintiff would

much rather be rightfully back in his own home. The

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court re-

8 See Attachment B – photo of Plaintiff’s cell phone, and

failed attempts to access the Twitter page of Attorney General

Maura Healey.

Page 9: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

9

consider the request for injunctive relief as these

facts are brought to the Court’s attention.

8. The decision to come forward and expose the referenced

misconduct brings considerable concern for the Plaintiff’s

safety and well-being for both the short, as well as the

long-term. It is however necessary to bring ALL facts

related to this matter to the Court’s attention, if a fair

and just resolution is to ultimately be made here, and in

the Public interest.

9. A request for the appointment of a special prosecutor has

been respectfully made through the Office of the Inspector

General and the Department of Justice.

10. Without the assistance of experienced legal counsel,

The collective (and still growing) allegations which

include Federal Violations of RICO, FALSE CLAIMS,

WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION, etc…, involve areas far beyond

this Plaintiff’s capability to accurately and timely

articulate and file this Federal complaint.

11. A considerable timeline extension is necessary to

allow the referenced complaints filed with the Inspector

General and the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission to

be addressed, investigated, and whether any further

action/assistance comes from either Office.

Page 10: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

10

The Plaintiff therefore respectfully requests from the Court

the following:

1. Grant the Plaintiff a ninety-day extension to allow

Federal and State authorities the proper time for

investigation, and to render its conclusions, prior to

proceeding with this Civil complaint. The Plaintiff will

plan to update the Court on or before the timeline

expiration, as updates are received.

2. With the acknowledgments from the Commonwealth confirming

the Plaintiff’s illegal foreclosure and clouded title,

the Plaintiff respectfully pleads for the Court to re-

consider injunctive relief, and to (at minimum) allow for

the Plaintiff to return to his home while these legal

matters proceed, and before the Plaintiff necessitates

making a twelve-month financial commitment on an

apartment lease.

The Plaintiff is grateful for the Court’s consideration of this

request.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar

Plaintiff

Page 11: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

11

Attachment A

Page 12: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

12

Dear MA State Ethics Commission, Thank you for your email. Per our conversation, this email communication is sent to your attention with the specific purpose of initiating a complaint against parties, whose actions (alleged) are associated with identified misconduct of the US Foreclosure/Financial Crisis. For the record, my name is Mohan A. Harihar - I have been a pro se litigant in MA State Courts for over four (4) years (out of financial necessity), in effort to recoup accruing damages resulting from an illegal foreclosure and displacement identified with the US Foreclosure Crisis. There is now a new civil complaint which has been recently filed in the US District Court (Boston, MA, Docket No:15-cv-11880, Harihar vs. US Bank, et al), as a greater scope of misconduct (alleged) is being revealed. A sincere effort is additionally being made to align the referenced civil complaint with related criminal complaints filed with the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, the Massachusetts Inspector General's Office, the US Attorney's Office, and the Fraud Investigations Unit of the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation). These efforts to align referenced complaints are seemingly being ignored by state and federal prosecutors. The US District Court has indicated that they do not have the authority to align civil and criminal complaints, and that any concerns must be addressed through the Executive Branch of Government. There is clearly evidenced reason to suspect, that improper relationships including evidenced Collusion, involves: the MA Attorney General's Office, the US Attorney's Office, the Boston BAR Association, and the retained counsel for Defendants in the referenced civil litigation (Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, and K&L Gates LLP). Attached for reference, is a copy of the September 2015 Media Alert which includes the evidenced improper relationships including COLLUSION, found in an advertisement for the West LegalEdcenter course entitled, “After the Bubble Bursts.” Also included are email communications sent directly to the attention of Assistant Director Andrew McCabe (FBI Washington, DC), US Attorney Carmen Ortiz, and Attorney General Maura Healey.

Page 13: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

13

These clearly evidenced allegations are believed to be part of a greater scheme and include (at minimum) Federal RICO and FALSE CLAIMS violations. There is reason to suspect that an alleged scheme may also be tied to infringement of intellectual property belonging to Mohan A. Harihar, entitled the "FCS Model" (See attached PowerPoint Presentation). The FCS Model is an economic framework designed to address multiple variables of the US Foreclosure/Financial Crisis. Properly implemented, this framework is expected to deliver positive economic growth estimated in the trillions of dollars. I have personally presented this framework to multiple parties including:

1. The Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General - Senior Policy Advisors Britte McBride and Jennifer Stark.

2. The New Hampshire Attorney General (former) Michael Delaney - also included in this meeting was the Governor's Chief of Staff, NH Secretary of State, and members of the Governor's Council.

3. State Senator Eileen Donoghue (MA) 4. Congresswoman Nikki Tsongas (MA) - Presented to Director (former) Brian Martin. 5. Deputy Chief Counsel (Former) of the House Financial Services Committee - Gail Laster. 6. The Chairman of a Nationally ranked Strategic Communications firm.

This framework has since been reviewed by US Senator Warren's Senior Economic Advisor - Bruno Freitas, and has also been sent to the Executive Offices of the President (EOP) at the specific request of Vice President Joe Biden. NO ONE HAS FOUND FLAW WITH THIS FRAMEWORK. It is suspected, that along with the allegations of improper relationships, there has been infringement of the referenced intellectual property (since presentation) to create related programs and to influence and/or create legislation within the Commonwealth. This results in personal gain to those responsible, if not directly in a financial capacity, then in recognition for achievement in their professional role. Therefore, for their respective roles as the person in charge of the Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General, this initial complaint is filed against two (2) individuals, for their actions in this matter, and their failure/refusal to bring criminal charges against responsible parties.:

1. Attorney General Maura Healey 2. Former Attorney General Martha Coakley

This is merely a fraction of the supporting evidence and information on file. A complete review of the historical record will be necessary to reveal all supporting components as this process moves forward. Please note, there is now considerable concern involving the Commonwealth's effort to pass legislation to CLEAR TITLE TO PROPERTY (S 1981), which has just passed in the Senate. For reasons unknown, the MA Attorney General's Office has recently blocked the Twitter account belonging to Mohan A. Harihar, prohibiting the ability to view these proposed efforts to CLEAR TITLE.This matter is believed to be related to the referenced scheme previously mentioned. A similar complaint is being filed on a federal level. If you have any questions, please call me direct @ 617.921.2526 (mobile). Thank you for your attention to this very serious and sensitive matter. Sincerely,

Page 14: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

14

Mohan A. Harihar 4 Attachments

Preview attachment MA-AGO Blocked.JPG

MA-AGO Blocked.JPG

Preview attachment Media Alert - September 2015.pdf

Media Alert - September 2015.pdf

Preview attachment HomeCorpsPPforCHAPA2-7-13-v2.pdf

HomeCorpsPPforCHAPA2-7-13-v2.pdf

Preview attachment VP Biden FCS - part 1 overview.ppt

VP Biden FCS - part 1 overview.ppt

Page 15: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

15

Sep 21 (3 days ago)

Mr. Harihar:

This will confirm our conversation of this afternoon. You may respond to this email

with the particulars of your complaint, or you may mail it to me at the address below.

MA State Ethics Commission

One Ashburton Place

Boston, MA 02108

The information contained in this communication, including any attachments, is

confidential, is intended for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be

exempt from public disclosure or subject to the attorney/client or work product

privileges. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are notified

that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly

prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please delete it and destroy all

copies.

Page 16: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

16

Attachment B

Page 17: Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case

17