f proton plan eric prebys, fnal accelerator division

17
f Proton Plan Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

Upload: garry-james

Post on 05-Jan-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

f

Proton Plan Proton Plan

Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

Page 2: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 2

f Proton Plan ChargeProton Plan Charge

Develop a plan for a reasonable set of improvements and operational initiatives to maximize proton delivery to NuMI and the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) over the next ten years or so.

Estimate the budget and timeline for these improvements.

Estimate proton delivery to both beam lines if the Plan proceeds on schedule.

Note: this plan precedes the Proton Driver replacement of the existing Proton Source (Linac+Booster).

Page 3: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 3

f Staged Approach to Neutrino ProgramStaged Approach to Neutrino Program

Stage 0 (now): Goal: deliver 2.5E13 protons per 2 second MI cycle to NuMI (~2E20 p/yr), limited

by MI RF system. Deliver 1-2E20 protons per year to Booster Neutrino Beam (currently MiniBooNE)

Stage 1 (~2007): A combination of Main Injector RF improvements and operational loading

initiatives will increase the NuMI intensity to 4-5E13 protons to NuMI per 2.2 second cycle (~3E20 p/yr).

This will increase by ~20% as protons currently used for pbar production become available.

It is hoped we can continue to operate BNB at the 2E20 p/yr level during this period.

Stage 2 (post-collider): In this phase, we will consider using the Recycler as a preloader to the Main

Injector and possibly reducing the Main Injector cycle time. The exact scope and potential of these improvements are under study.

Stage 3 (proton driver or equiv.) Main Injector RF must accommodate 1.5E14 protons every 1.5 seconds NuMI beamline and target must also be compatible with these intensities.

This plan

Page 4: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 4

f Limits to Proton IntensityLimits to Proton Intensity

Total proton rate from Proton Source (Linac+Booster): Booster batch size

• ~4-5E12 protons/batch Booster repetition rate

• 15 Hz instantaneous• Prior to shutdown: 7.5Hz average (injection bump+RF)

Beam loss• Damage and/or activation of Booster components• Above ground radiation

Total protons accelerated in Main Injector: Maximum main injector load

• Six “slots” for booster batches (3E13)• Up to ~11 with slip stacking (4.5-5.5E13)• RF stability limitations (under study)

Cycle time:• 1.4s + loading time (1/15s per booster batch)

Historically our biggest worry

Page 5: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 5

f Proton Plan Developments Since Last Ops Proton Plan Developments Since Last Ops ReviewReview

AD Review, July 2005 Director’s Review, August 2005 “Baseline”, September 2005 Since baseline:

Plan tracked with monthly PMG meetings Change control through formal change request (CR)

procedure.• So far, five complete CR’s with three more in process

Page 6: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 6

f

Page 7: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 7

f Plan StrategyPlan Strategy

Increasing the proton delivery from the Booster to NuMI and MiniBooNE Increase maximum average Booster repetition rate. Increase acceptance by improving orbit control and beam quality.

Increasing the beam intensity in the Main Injector for NuMI Main Injector multi-batch operation. Slip stacking in Main Injector (requires RF upgrade).

Improving operational reliability and radiation limitations Linac quad supplies Booster and Linac Instrumentation Booster RF Upgrade Alleviate 7835 Problem

Organized along the Run II model “campaign” rather than “project”

Page 8: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 8

f Significant Elements of PlanSignificant Elements of Plan

Linac Stockpile two year supply of spare 200 MHz power amplifier tubes

(7835’s), in the event of an interruption in supply Characterize and improve Low Energy Linac Low Level RF

Booster: Replace and reconfigure injection bump (ORBUMP) system. Relocate 8 GeV dump from Booster tunnel to MI-8 transfer line Make Booster robust to 9 Hz, and understand requirements to go

to 15 Hz Design, build, and install new corrector system

Main Injector: Replace seven quadrupoles with increased aperture versions, to

reduce injection and extraction losses. Operationally develop multi-batch and multi-batch slip stacked

operation Design and install collimation system, both in the MI-8 line and in

the MI ring Modify injection kicker to allow multi-batch slip stacked operation Characterize and perhaps make improvements to RF system, to

support high intensity operation.Red = to be completed this

shutdown

Page 9: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 9

f Level 3 Breakdown with BudgetLevel 3 Breakdown with Budget

Page 10: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 10

f

Proton Plan Required AD Labor By Job Type

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Fe

b-0

6

Ap

r-0

6

Jun

-06

Au

g-0

6

Oct

-06

De

c-0

6

Fe

b-0

7

Ap

r-0

7

Jun

-07

Au

g-0

7

Oct

-07

De

c-0

7

Fe

b-0

8

Ap

r-0

8

Jun

-08

Au

g-0

8

Oct

-08

De

c-0

8

Month

FT

E

AD RF Tech

AD RF Electrical Engineer

AD Project Scheduler

AD Project Manager

AD Physicist

AD Mechanical Technician

AD Mechanical Engineer

AD Engineer

AD Electrical Technician

AD Electrical Engineer

AD Drafter/Designer

AD Computer Professional

Proton Plan Required Labor By Division

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Feb-0

6

Apr-

06

Jun-0

6

Aug-0

6

Oct-

06

Dec-0

6

Feb-0

7

Apr-

07

Jun-0

7

Aug-0

7

Oct-

07

Dec-0

7

Feb-0

8

Apr-

08

Jun-0

8

Aug-0

8

Oct-

08

Dec-0

8

Month

FT

E

TD labor

PPD Labor

AD Labor

Labor ProfilesLabor Profiles

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

2006

Sh

utd

ow

n

2007

Sh

utd

ow

n

2008

Sh

utd

ow

n

Build Correctors

Page 11: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 11

f Major Accomplishments This YearMajor Accomplishments This Year

Linac 10/12 strategic spare 7835’s delivered so far Design of pulsed quad supplies ongoing LEL LLRF studies well under way

Booster Operationally supported slip stacking for pBar production,

NuMI, and MiniBooNE• Required operational cogging• Logintudinal properties improved with the intervention of

Rapid Response Team (RRT) Worked in preparation for this shutdown

• More about this shortly

Main Injector Initiated routine full 2+5 operation

• Rate maximum until slip stacking begins after shutdown Did studies related to full slip stacking

• Demonstrated accelerated 2+9 operation at low intensity

Page 12: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 12

f Proton ProjectionsProton Projections

Phases of Operation Phase I (now)

• Booster lattice distortions ameliorated• Booster limited to 7.5Hz total repetition rate• Main Injector limited to 4E13 protons (2+5 operation)

Phase II• After present shutdown• Injection bump (ORBUMP) replaced• Drift tube cooling in Booster RF cooling finished• Booster capable of 8-9Hz operation• Begin to implement 2+9 full NuMI slip stack operation.

Phase III• Full NuMI 2+9 slip stack operation.• Might require some MI RF modifications (under study)

Page 13: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 13

f Procedure for estimating Proton DeliveryProcedure for estimating Proton Delivery

Assume traditional operational priority: Protons for pBar production

• Limited by ability to slip stack• Limited by max cooling rate

Protons for NuMI• Limited by max Booster batch size• Limited by max MI cycle rate• Limited by max MI proton capacity• (will be) limited by ability to slip stack NuMI protons in MI

Protons for BNB (currently MiniBooNE)• Determined by difference between Booster capacity and

maximum MI loading.• Currently limited by Booster losses, and will continue to

be for some time.• Ultimately limited by Booster rep. rate.• Extremely sensitive to fluctuations in total Booster

output

Page 14: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 14

f Evaluate Effect of Booster ImprovementsEvaluate Effect of Booster Improvements

Calculate effect of various improvements based on increased acceptance:

Use:2

max

p

pDAA T

2

2max p

pDAA

T

Effective aperture reduction

Booster Dump Relocation

Page 15: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 15

f Long Term ProjectionsLong Term Projections

Note: these projections do not take into account the collider turning off in 2009 NuMI rates would go up at least 20% Possibly much higher with Stage II improvements

NuMI Totals

0.00E+00

2.00E+20

4.00E+20

6.00E+20

8.00E+20

1.00E+21

1.20E+21

1.40E+21

1.60E+21

1.80E+21

2.00E+21

1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012

Date

Pro

ton

s

No Slipstack

Design

Protons to BNB

0.00E+00

5.00E+20

1.00E+21

1.50E+21

2.00E+21

2.50E+21

1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012

DateP

roto

ns

Fallback

Design

Post Collider

Post Collider

Page 16: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 16

f FY06 Proton to MiniBooNEFY06 Proton to MiniBooNE

Page 17: F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division

DOE Tevatron Operations Review - Prebys 17

f Protons to NuMIProtons to NuMI