ezra klein - the medical malpractice myth. - by ezra klein - slate magazine

3
Sens. Bill Frist and Hillary Clinton RELATED IN SLATE David Dobbs presents the Swedish fix to medical malpractice. Michael Kinsley attacks the American Medical Association's approach to tort reform. Atul Gawande argues that when medical errors happen, doctors are to blame, not "the system." The Medical Malpractice Myth Forget tort reform. The Democrats have a better diagnosis. By Ezra Klein Posted Tuesday, July 11, 2006, at 6:20 AM ET The Republican answer to runaway health-care spending is to cap jury awards in medical malpractice suits. For the fifth time in four years, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist tried and failed to cap awards at $250,000 during his self- proclaimed "Health Care Week" in May. But this time, the Democrats put a better idea on the table. Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama also want to save on health care. But rather than capping jury awards, they hope to cut the number of medical malpractice cases by reducing medical errors, as they explain in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine. In other words, to the Republicans, suits and payouts are the ill. To the Democrats, the problem is a slew of medical injuries of which the suits are a symptom. The latest evidence shows the Democrats' diagnosis to be right. The best attempt to synthesize the academic literature on medical malpractice is Tom Baker's The Medical Malpractice Myth, published last November. Baker, a law professor at the University of Connecticut who studies insurance, argues that the hype about medical malpractice suits is "urban legend mixed with the occasional true story, supported by selective references to academic studies." After all, including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts, the cost of the suits comes to less than one- half of 1 percent of health-care spending. If anything, there are fewer lawsuits than would be expected, and far more injuries than we usually imagine. As proof, Baker marshals an overwhelming array of research. The most impressive and comprehensive study is by the Harvard Medical Practice released in 1990. The Harvard researchers took a huge sample of 31,000 medical records, dating from the mid-1980s, and had them evaluated by practicing doctors and nurses, the professionals most likely to be sympathetic to the demands of the doctor's office and operating room. The records went through multiple rounds of evaluation, and a finding of negligence was made only if two doctors, working independently, separately reached that conclusion. Even with this conservative methodology, the study found that doctors were injuring one out of every 25 patients—and that only 4 percent of these injured patients sued. The Harvard study stands for a large body of literature. On their own, however, the results don't disprove the Republicans' thesis that many medical malpractice suits are frivolous. Maybe badly injured patients don't sue, while the reflexively litigious clog up the legal system, making tort reform a viable solution. But a new study, released in May, demolishes that possibility. Dr. David Studdert led a team of eight researchers from Harvard School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Harvard Risk Management Foundation* who examined 1,452 medical malpractice lawsuits. They found that more than 90 percent of the claims showed evidence of medical injury, which means they weren't frivolous. In 60 percent of these cases, the injury resulted from physician wrongdoing. In a quarter of the claims, the patient died. The Movie That Makes a Better Case for Sarah Palin Than She Ever Did How Do You Get Rural African AIDS Patients To Trust Western Medicine? The Five Most Interesting Things You'll Ever Read About the Porn Industry The Trip: The Finest Michael Caine-Impression Showdown in History View My Network on Slate » MOST READ MOST E-MAILED ALSO IN SLATE RECOMMENDED FOR YOU [what's this] Slate.com on Facebook Like 146,144 Bush tax cuts 10th anniversary: They've been a failure in every conceivable way. 7,912 people shared this. NBA Finals 2011: LeBron James' Michael Jordan problem. 696 people shared this. Florida's crazy new law preventing doctors from asking patients about their guns. 2,194 people shared this. Brow Beat : The Return of Rollerblades? 1,160 people shared this. 1. Thanks a Lot, Ken Burns Because of you, my Civil War lecture is always packed— with students raised on your sentimental, romantic, deeply misleading portrait of the conflict. By James M. Lundberg | June 7, 2011 2. Happy 10 th Birthday, Bush Tax Cuts! You've been a failure in every conceivable way. By Annie Lowrey | June 8, 2011 3. The Longform.org Guide to the Porn Industry From the inspiration for Boogie Nights to the twisted psyche of a professional porn reviewer, five great reads about the BRIEFING NEWS & POLITICS ARTS LIFE BUSINESS & TECH SCIENCE PODCASTS & VIDEO BLOGS Search HOME / : HEALTH AND MEDICINE EXPLAINED. MEDICAL EXAMINER 122 Like PRINT DISCUSS E-MAIL RSS RECOMMEND... REPRINTS SINGLE PAGE Is Rosie Huntington-Whiteley really the hottest swimsuit model in the world? (StyleBistro) Los Angeles Lakers' Mike Brown: First meeting with Kobe Bryant 'went very well' (ESPN) Exxon, Chevron rivals in Yukos bid? (MarketWatch.com) Toyota forecasts sharp drop in profits (MarketWatch.com) 5 Financial Mistakes People Make (TheStreet.com)

Upload: arman-beirami

Post on 05-Jul-2015

243 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ezra klein  - the medical malpractice myth. - by ezra klein - slate magazine

Sens. Bi l l Frist and H i l laryCl inton

RELATED IN SLATE

David Dobbs presents the Swedish fix tomedical malpractice. Michael Kinsleyattacks the American MedicalAssociation's approach to tort reform.Atul Gawande argues that when medicalerrors happen, doctors are to blame,not "the system."

The Medical Malpractice MythForget tort reform. The Democrats have a better diagnosis.By Ezra KleinPosted Tuesday, July 11, 2006, at 6:20 AM ET

The Republican answer to runaway health-care spending isto cap jury awards in medical malpractice suits. For thefifth time in four years, Senate Majority Leader Bill Fristtried and failed to cap awards at $250,000 during his self-proclaimed "Health Care Week" in May. But this time, theDemocrats put a better idea on the table.

Sens. Hillary Clinton and BarackObama also want to save onhealth care. But rather thancapping jury awards, they hope

to cut the number of medical malpractice cases by reducing medicalerrors, as they explain in an article in the New England Journal ofMedicine. In other words, to the Republicans, suits and payouts arethe ill. To the Democrats, the problem is a slew of medical injuriesof which the suits are a symptom. The latest evidence shows theDemocrats' diagnosis to be right.

The best attempt tosynthesize the academic literature on medicalmalpractice is Tom Baker's The Medical MalpracticeMyth, published last November. Baker, a lawprofessor at the University of Connecticut whostudies insurance, argues that the hype aboutmedical malpractice suits is "urban legend mixedwith the occasional true story, supported byselective references to academic studies." After all,

including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts, the cost of the suits comes to less than one-half of 1 percent of health-care spending. If anything, there are fewer lawsuits than would beexpected, and far more injuries than we usually imagine.

As proof, Baker marshals an overwhelming array of research. The most impressive andcomprehensive study is by the Harvard Medical Practice released in 1990. The Harvardresearchers took a huge sample of 31,000 medical records, dating from the mid-1980s, andhad them evaluated by practicing doctors and nurses, the professionals most likely to besympathetic to the demands of the doctor's office and operating room. The records wentthrough multiple rounds of evaluation, and a finding of negligence was made only if twodoctors, working independently, separately reached that conclusion. Even with thisconservative methodology, the study found that doctors were injuring one out of every 25patients—and that only 4 percent of these injured patients sued.

The Harvard study stands for a large body of literature. On their own, however, the resultsdon't disprove the Republicans' thesis that many medical malpractice suits are frivolous. Maybebadly injured patients don't sue, while the reflexively litigious clog up the legal system, makingtort reform a viable solution. But a new study, released in May, demolishes that possibility. Dr.David Studdert led a team of eight researchers from Harvard School of Public Health, Brighamand Women's Hospital, and the Harvard Risk Management Foundation* who examined 1,452medical malpractice lawsuits. They found that more than 90 percent of the claims showedevidence of medical injury, which means they weren't frivolous. In 60 percent of these cases,the injury resulted from physician wrongdoing. In a quarter of the claims, the patient died.

The Movie That Makes aBetter Case for Sarah PalinThan She Ever Did

How Do You Get Rural AfricanAIDS Patients To TrustWestern Medicine?

The Five Most InterestingThings You'll Ever ReadAbout the Porn Industry

The Trip: The Finest MichaelCaine-Impression Showdownin History

View My Network on Slate»MOSTREAD

MOSTE-MAILED

ALSO IN SLATE

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

[what's this]

Slate.com on Facebook

Like 146,144

Bush tax cuts 10th anniversary: They've beena failure in every conceivable way.7,912 people shared this.

NBA Finals 2011: LeBron James' MichaelJordan problem.696 people shared this.

Florida's crazy new law preventing doctorsfrom asking patients about their guns. 2,194 people shared this.

Brow Beat : The Return of Rollerblades?1,160 people shared this.

Why a Sarah Palin presidential campaign ishopeless.917 people shared this.

Ken Burns' Civil War: How the documentarychanged the way we think about the war.1,890 people shared this.

Anthony Weiner scandal: In defense of thecrotch shot.289 people shared this.

Appropriate work attire: What is OK to wearto the office in the summer?311 people shared this.

Fired (and resigned) journalists extractliterary revenge on their former bosses.2,336 people shared this.

1. Thanks a Lot, Ken BurnsBecause of you, my Civil War lecture is always packed—with students raised on your sentimental, romantic, deeplymisleading portrait of the conflict.By James M. Lundberg | June 7, 2011

2. Happy 10th Birthday, Bush Tax Cuts!You've been a failure in every conceivable way.By Annie Lowrey | June 8, 2011

3. The Longform.org Guide to the Porn IndustryFrom the inspiration for Boogie Nights to the twisted psycheof a professional porn reviewer, five great reads about the

BRIEFING NEWS & POLITICS ARTS LIFE BUSINESS & TECH SCIENCE PODCASTS & VIDEO BLOGS Search

HOME / : HEALTH AND MEDICINE EXPLAINED.MEDICAL EXAMINER

122Like

PRINT

DISCUSS

E-MAIL

RSS

RECOMMEND...

REPRINTS

SINGLE PAGE

Is Rosie Huntington-Whiteley really thehottest swimsuit model in the world?(StyleBistro)

Los Angeles Lakers' Mike Brown: Firstmeeting with Kobe Bryant 'went very well'(ESPN)

Exxon, Chevron rivals in Yukos bid?(MarketWatch.com)

Toyota forecasts sharp drop in profits(MarketWatch.com)

5 Financial Mistakes People Make(TheStreet.com)

Page 2: Ezra klein  - the medical malpractice myth. - by ezra klein - slate magazine

Like 122 people like this. Be the first of your friends.

MORE FROM SLATE MORE FROM THE WEB

When baseless medical malpractice suits were brought, the study further found, the courtsefficiently threw them out. Only six of the cases in which the researchers couldn't detect injuryreceived even token compensation. Of those in which an injury resulted from treatment, butevidence of error was uncertain, 145 out of 515 received compensation. Indeed, a biggerproblem was that 236* cases were thrown out of court despite evidence of injury and error topatients by physicians. The other approximately 1,050 cases, in the research team's opinion,were decided correctly, with damage awards going to the injured and dismissal foiling thefrivolous suits.*

Nor is there evidence to show that the level of jury awards has shot up. A recent RAND studylooked at the growth in malpractice awards between 1960 and 1999. "Our results arestriking," the research team concluded. "Not only do we show that real average awards havegrown by less than real income over the 40 years in our sample, we also find that essentiallyall of this growth can be explained by changes in observable case characteristics and claimedeconomic losses."

Which brings us back to the Republicans' and Democrats' divergent approaches. The Obama-Clinton legislation fits well with Studdert's and RAND's findings. It also builds on successfulefforts by the nation's anesthesiologists and a few hospitals to reduce their medical malpracticepayouts.

Anesthesiologists used to get hit with the most malpractice lawsuits and some of the highestinsurance premiums. Then in the late 1980s, the American Society of Anesthesiologistslaunched a project to analyze every claim ever brought against its members and develop newways to reduce medical error. By 2002, the specialty had one of the highest safety ratings inthe profession, and its average insurance premium plummeted to its 1985 level, buckingnationwide trends. Similarly, feeling embattled by a high rate of malpractice claims, theUniversity of Michigan Medical System in 2002 analyzed all adverse claims and used the datato restructure procedures to guard against error. Since instituting the program, the number ofsuits has dropped by half, and the university's annual spending on malpractice litigation isdown two-thirds. And at the Lexington, Ky., Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a program of earlydisclosure and settlement of malpractice claims lowered average settlement costs to $15,000,compared with $83,000 for other VA hospitals.

Clinton and Obama would offer federal grants and support to unroll such programs nationwide.And they want to create a national database to track incidents of malpractice and fundresearch into standards, procedures, and technologies that would prevent future injuries. So,what say you, Bill Frist? Is it time for another Health Care Week?

Correction, July 11, 2006: The original paragraph misstated the relevant numbers in theStuddert malpractice study. (Return to the corrected paragraph.)

Correction, July 17, 2006: The original sentence incorrectly stated the institutionalaffiliations of the researchers. (Return to the corrected paragraph.)

The original sentence incorrectly stated the number of cases thrown out of court despiteevidence of injury and physician error. (Return to the corrected paragraph.)

Like Slate on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

TODAY'SPICTURES

TODAY'SCARTOONS

TODAY'SDOONESBURY

TODAY'SVIDEO

business of smut.By Max Linsky | June 10, 2011

4. Lunch With David MametThe dramatist says he's "crazy" about Sarah Palin.By John Gapper | June 11, 2011

5. AirlessLeBron James' Michael Jordan problem.By Josh Levin | June 10, 2011

GET TODAY IN SLATE

MORE MEDICAL EXAMINER COLUMNS

We Eat Crap. It Makes Us Sick.Our inability to talk about it is driving the hysteriaaround Europe's E. coli outbreak.Kent Sepkowitz | June 6, 2011

Man MilkMy curious quest to breast-feed.Michael Thomsen | May 25, 2011

CursesAre there really more accidents on Friday the 13th?Atul Gawande | May 13, 2011

Search for more Medical Examiner articles

Subscribe to the Medical Examiner RSS feed

View our complete Medical Examiner archive

Weiner admits #Twitter exchange with teen:http://slate.me/mbztEDIs Romney going to pull a Hillary in Iowa?http://slate.me/lLrVjMHow to fight AIDS in Tanzania: http://slate.me/lOtj7e

Rep. Weiner to Seek Treatment, Leave of Absence fromHouse

Sasha Obama Celebrates Her 10th BirthdayFat Joe Loses 88 Pounds

Pyongyang Spring?: The Arab Revolutions Even HaveKim Jong Il Nervous

Will the Spoiled Children of Yemen's Rival Leaders Tearthe Country Apart?

Twits: Anthony Weiner Isn't the Only Politician WhoShould've Thought Before He Tweeted

1 Comments Or join the discussionon the FrayAdd Yours

Like This Story

Obama Gets Cranky About AlphaKappa Alpha

What Does the Bible Say AboutMitch Daniels’ Unusual Marriage?

Fired (and resigned) journalistsextract literary revenge on theirformer bosses.

Shaquille O'Neal thanks Los AngelesLakers, says he will not coach (from ESPN)

Sears off amid management shakeup(from MarketWatch.com)

Certificate of deposit investingstrategies (from BankRate.com)

Victoria’s Secret Model May Lose Job for

Sign up for Slate's daily newsletter.

Enter your e-mail address.

Spring rolls eternal.

Page 3: Ezra klein  - the medical malpractice myth. - by ezra klein - slate magazine

The Movie That Makes aBetter Case for Sarah PalinThan She Ever Did

How Do You Get RuralAfrican AIDS Patients ToTrust Western Medicine?

The Five Most InterestingThings You'll Ever ReadAbout the Porn Industry

Why Do Celebrities KeepDoing Dramatic Readings ofUnexpected Texts?

The Trip: The FinestMichael Caine-ImpressionShowdown in History

A.S. Byatt: All of the ThingsMen Told Me WomenCouldn't Do

Login required, click here to begin

Share This Page

Follow

Friday, February 05, 2010, 15:43:49 – Flag – Reply

Social Networking by Echo

Ezra Klein is a writing fellow at The American Prospect.

Photgraph of Sens. Bill Frist and Hillary Clinton by Joshua Roberts/Getty Images.

Cancel Post

Jonathan Michael Lloyd The above is all well and good, but what of the costs *within* the healthcare system due toa perception of risk due to lawsuits? I speak of the multiple lab tests that may not benecessary for a diagnosis or treatment option, and which add up to billions of dollarsacross this great land of ours.

If comments do not automatically load, click here.

site map | build your own Slate | the fray | about us | contact us | Slate on Facebook | search | ad choicesfeedback | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile | make Slate your homepage

Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Division of the Washington Post Company

All contents © 2011 The Slate Group, LLC. All rights reserved. User Agreement and Privacy Policy

Charles Krauthammer: TheUnforgivable Thing About Arrogant,Ugly, Corrupt, Unserious Liberals IsTheir Contempt for People WhoDisagree With Them

Slate Magazine - Editorial andPolitical Cartoons, Comic Strips

[what'sthis]

Being Too Thin (from Diets in Review)

H-P Outlook Gloomy: Can Tablets,WebOS Turn Things Around (fromCFOWorld)

Login