eye health needs assessment bristol, north somerset, somerset … · eye health needs assessment...

56
Eye Health Needs Assessment Bristol, North Somerset, Somerset and South Gloucestershire (BNSSSG) Lucy McCann, Public Health Specialty Registrar March 2015

Upload: dangnguyet

Post on 13-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Eye Health Needs Assessment

Bristol, North Somerset, Somerset

and South Gloucestershire (BNSSSG)

Lucy McCann, Public Health Specialty Registrar

March 2015

2

Contents

Executive summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Costs .................................................................................................................................................. 4

Major eye conditions ........................................................................................................................ 4

Children and young people ............................................................................................................. 5

Service provision .............................................................................................................................. 5

Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 5

Glossary of eye conditions .................................................................................................................. 7

Age-related macular degeneration ................................................................................................ 7

Blindness ........................................................................................................................................... 7

Cataract ............................................................................................................................................. 7

Diabetic retinopathy ......................................................................................................................... 7

Drusen ................................................................................................................................................ 7

Glaucoma .......................................................................................................................................... 7

Uncorrected refractive error ............................................................................................................ 8

1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 9

1.1 Public health importance of sight loss and eye health ......................................................... 9

1.2 Importance of a health needs assessment ............................................................................ 9

1.3 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 9

2. Key National Drivers and Policy .................................................................................................. 11

2.1 UK vision strategy .................................................................................................................... 11

2.2 Public health outcomes framework ....................................................................................... 11

2.3 NHS outcomes framework 2012/13 ...................................................................................... 12

2.4 Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) Programme ............................... 12

2.5 NHS England ‘Call to Action’: Improving eye health and reducing sight loss ................ 12

2.6 Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Clinical Priority Programme ............... 13

2.7 WHO Vision 2020 .................................................................................................................... 13

2.8 CCG Outcomes Framework/Local CCG priorities .............................................................. 13

3. Population Characteristics of BNSSSG and Health Determinants ........................................ 14

3.1 Age ............................................................................................................................................. 14

3.2 Gender ...................................................................................................................................... 15

3.4 Ethnicity ..................................................................................................................................... 15

3.5 Lifestyle factors ........................................................................................................................ 16

3.6 Deprivation ................................................................................................................................ 16

3

3.7 Co-morbidities .......................................................................................................................... 16

3.7.1 Learning disabilities ......................................................................................................... 17

3.7.2 Dementia ........................................................................................................................... 18

3.7.3 Falls .................................................................................................................................... 18

3.7.4 Depression ........................................................................................................................ 18

3.7.5 Stroke ................................................................................................................................. 18

4. Incidence and Prevalence of Partial Sight and Blindness ....................................................... 20

5. Cost of eye care ............................................................................................................................. 23

6. Eye conditions ................................................................................................................................ 25

6.1 Age related macular degeneration ........................................................................................ 25

6.2 Glaucoma .................................................................................................................................. 27

6.3 Cataract ..................................................................................................................................... 29

6.4 Diabetic eye disease ............................................................................................................... 30

6.5 Low vision ................................................................................................................................. 31

6.6 Uncorrected refractive error ................................................................................................... 32

7. Children and Young People ......................................................................................................... 34

8. Current Activities, Service Provision and Assets ...................................................................... 37

8.1 Sight tests ................................................................................................................................. 37

8.2 Hospital activity ........................................................................................................................ 38

8.3 Primary care ............................................................................................................................. 39

8.4 Additional information and data ............................................................................................. 39

9. Patient voice ................................................................................................................................... 40

10. Recommendations/priorities ...................................................................................................... 41

11. Data sources ................................................................................................................................ 42

12. Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 43

13. References ................................................................................................................................... 44

Appendix 1: Supplementary data ..................................................................................................... 47

4

Executive summary

There are an estimated 46,080 people living with sight loss in BNSSSG, far more than the

7,565 which are registered. One of the major risk factors for sight loss is age; in view of

current population trends towards an ageing population, estimates suggest there could be

over 70,000 people living with sight loss in the area by 2030. In addition to age, when

considering the health needs of this population, various other factors should be taken into

account; these include ethnicity, smoking, deprivation and obesity. The latter of these could

place huge demand on health services if obesity continues to rise at the current rate.

Sight loss is also associated with a number of co-morbidities, for example, stroke,

neurological conditions, learning disabilities, dementia, falls and depression. Poorer health

outcomes are often seen in people who are affected by these conditions and are visually

impaired compared to those who have the condition but are not visually impaired. Therefore,

reducing avoidable sight loss, ensuring rapid diagnosis, appropriate and timely treatment

and suitable support is vital.

Costs The costs of visual impairment are high and include not only the direct costs associated with

healthcare, such as inpatient and outpatient expenditure, prescribing, general ophthalmic

services and expenditure associated with injurious falls, but also the indirect costs, such as

unpaid care, adaptations and unemployment. Programme budgeting data suggest total

healthcare expenditure for BNSSSG was £58.4 million in 2012/13, whilst the indirect costs of

sight loss have been estimated at £107 million.

Major eye conditions The major sight conditions in the UK are: age-macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma,

diabetic retinopathy and cataract.

• AMD is the leading cause of certifiable sight loss, with 46% of new Certificate of

Visual Impairments (CVIs) attributed to AMD in people aged 65 and over in 2011/12.

There are an estimated 12,495 cases of AMD in BNSSSG, approximately two-thirds

of which are “wet” AMD, which is about 1.8% of the population aged 50 and over.

• Glaucoma is an asymptomatic disease (in its early stages) that damages the optic

nerve and can lead to blindness. Estimates suggest there may be around 12,549

people in BNSSSG with glaucoma, a further 47,449 suspected cases and 26,651

people with ocular hypertension, which is a condition that increases the risk of

developing glaucoma.

5

• Surgical cataract prevalence has been estimated at 14,650 for BNSSSG. The

condition was responsible for 57% of all ophthalmic inpatient admissions in 2012/13.

• Diabetic retinopathy is a complication of diabetes and estimates suggest there were

25,101 adults living with the condition across BNSSSG in 2011 and this is expected

to rise by 11% by 2020, a rate of increase above the national average. Given the

current and ongoing rise of diabetes in the UK, diabetic retinopathy is expected to

have a major impact on eye services in the future. Diabetic retinopathy screening is

an effective way of detecting the disease as early as possible; screening levels

across BNSSSG ranged from 83.3% to 92.3% in 2011/12.

Low vision and uncorrected refractive error are two additional conditions of importance in

eye health. Estimates suggest there may be almost 20,000 people with impaired vision

(binocular acuity <6/18) and approximately 16,000 people with low vision (binocular acuity

<6/18 to 3/60) living in BNSSSG. It is thought uncorrected refractive error in people aged

over 60 affect anywhere between 7,000 and 24,000 people.

Children and young people Children with vision impairment have different needs from adults with sight loss. There were

350 children (aged <18) registered as blind or partially sighted as of March 2014, however

this figure is likely to be an underestimate due to issues with registration data; estimates

suggest the actual number could be over 50% higher. Data on sight tests show that only

one-quarter of children under 16 received an NHS sight test in 2013/14, meaning that may

be a number of children with some degree of undiagnosed and uncorrected visual

impairment.

Service provision There are a range of service providers that provide eye services across BNSSSG, including

optometrists, ophthalmology departments/hospitals, GPs, community and voluntary sector

and social care. Some hospital data is included in this report. Hospital activity data found

that there were over 13,000 finished admission episodes with a primary diagnosis of

‘Diseases of the eye and adnexa’ across the four main providers in BNSSSG in 2012/13.

Recommendations This report presents a rapid health needs assessment of eye health in BNSSSG. Further

data are required to provide a more complete overview for each CCG, however this report

provides an overview across the whole BNSSSG area and some key recommendations

have been identified. The primary recommendation is that each local areas uses the data

6

presented in this report to inform their Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) with

supplementary data from local services.

A number of additional issues have been identified for consideration when developing

strategies and plans relating to eye health:

• Early detection is a priority;

• Increasing ageing population and increase in diabetes;

• Equity of access;

• Good quality support services, including rehabilitation;

• Mapping of eye health services;

• Identify areas of best practice;

• Link with other relevant strategies.

7

Glossary of eye conditions

Age-related macular degeneration

Patients with AMD lose their central vision so tasks that involve detail like reading and face

recognition become difficult if not impossible. Peripheral vision is usually preserved. There

are two types of AMD, commonly known as “dry” and “wet”.

Whilst there is no suitable treatment for dry AMD at present, the National Institute for Health

and Care Excellence (NICE) has confirmed that in some cases of wet AMD, treatment by

injection with an anti VEGF agent Ranibizumab (Lucentis) or Aflibercept (Eylea) can reduce

loss of vision (NICE 2008, 2013).1

Blindness

An inability to see or absence or loss of sight severe enough for someone to be unable to

perform any work for which eyesight is essential.2

Cataract

A cataract is the development of irregularities in the structure of the crystalline lens that

leads to a reduction of transparency.1 The symptoms most commonly reported are blurry

vision, problems with light, ‘faded’ colours, double or multiple vision.3

Diabetic retinopathy

A complication of diabetes mellitus, usually affecting both eyes. As the disease progresses,

some of the blood vessels that nourish the retina are blocked or become leaky, causing

vision loss through either proliferative retinopathy or macular oedema.3

Drusen

Drusen (singular, "druse") are tiny yellow or white accumulations of extracellular material

that build up between Bruch's membrane and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) of the

retina. The presence of a few small drusen is normal with advancing age and drusen alone

do not usually cause vision loss. However, the presence of larger and more numerous

drusen at the macula is a common early sign of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).4

Glaucoma

Glaucoma refers to a group of conditions characterised by visual field loss, and pathological

changes in the optic nerve head. There may also be raised intra-ocular pressure (IOP) as in

Chronic Open Angle Glaucoma (COAG) which is a common form of the condition. Sight loss

in glaucoma is not reversible.

8

Ocular hypertension (OHT) refers to patients who have raised IOP but do not have any sign

of glaucomatous damage at the optic nerve head or visual field loss. Patients diagnosed with

OHT require ongoing monitoring as they have significantly increased risk of developing

COAG later.

Glaucoma suspects may have early signs of optic nerve damage but may not yet exhibit

detectable field loss. They may or may not have raised IOP. The onset of glaucoma is

gradual.1

Uncorrected refractive error

Refractive errors refer to the focusing errors of short sight (myopia), long sight (hyperopia)

and astigmatism. All of these conditions give rise to blurred images on the retina unless

corrected with glasses or contact lenses.1

Figure 1: Visual impairment patterns expected in different eye conditions compared to normal

vision1

9

1. Introduction

1.1 Public health importance of sight loss and eye health

More than 1.8 million people are estimated to be living with sight loss in the UK and this is

expected to double by 2050.3 Often associated with increasing age, sight loss and conditions

affecting the eye will increase as a result of the UK’s ageing population. This has

implications in terms of costs, not just the direct health care costs but also indirect costs

such as unpaid care, adaptations and unemployment, not to mention the huge personal and

social costs to the individual.

The major sight conditions in the UK are age-related macular degeneration (AMD),

glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and cataracts.3 Uncorrected refractive error also cause

potentially registrable levels of visual impairment which can be improved with appropriate

refractive correction (i.e. spectacles or contact lenses). These conditions lead to visual

impairment (i.e. partial sight or blindness) if undetected but could be prevented if diagnosed

and managed appropriately. Evidence suggests that over 50 per cent of sight loss is due to

preventable or treatable causes.5

There are a number of risk factors associated with sight loss, including age, gender,

smoking, obesity and deprivation. Additionally, there are several co-morbidities which are

important considerations in assessing the health needs of this population.

1.2 Importance of a health needs assessment

A health needs assessment is a systematic process to assess the health issues facing a

population, leading to agreed priorities and resource allocation that will improve health and

reduce inequalities in a particular area.6

Needs assessments are a vital part of the commissioning cycle. Given the current numbers

affected by sight loss and the estimated future projects, identifying the needs of these people

and those at risk are central to the planning for local support and preventative services.

1.3 Purpose

This document will present the findings of a “rapid”i health needs assessment of eye health

and sight loss for the Bristol, North Somerset, Somerset and South Gloucestershire

(BNSSSG) area. As noted above, this is not a comprehensive need assessment and

therefore it is intended that this needs assessment provides baseline epidemiological data to

inform local Joint Strategic Needs Assessments (JSNAs) and other local service planning.

i Report will be a “rapid” needs assessment as it draws on existing data and the timescales are relatively short

10

There is limited information included on local service provision, user need and patient voice

and it is therefore anticipated that commissioning areas carry out local work to supplement

the information in this document in order to produce locally agreed priorities and resource

allocation to improve health and inequalities relating to eye health for that area.

11

2. Key National Drivers and Policy

A number of policy drivers for producing an eye health needs assessment in BNSSSG have

been identified. These are discussed in further detail below.

2.1 UK vision strategy

The UK vision strategy was launched in 2008 in response to the World Health Assembly

Resolution of 2003, which urged the development and implementation of plans to tackle

vision impairment, now known as VISION 2020 plans.7

In June 2013, the Strategy was refreshed and the 2013-2018 Strategy was launched, with

the following outcomes:

1. Everyone in the UK looks after their eyes and their sight;

2. Everyone with an eye condition receives timely treatment and, if permanent sight loss

occurs, early and appropriate services and support are available and accessible to

all;

3. A society in which people with sight loss can fully participate.

2.2 Public health outcomes framework

The Public Health Outcomes Framework Healthy lives, Healthy people: Improving outcomes

and supporting transparency, sets out a vision for public health, desired outcomes and the

indicators that will help us understand how well public health is being improved and

protected.8

Four objectives have been identified in order to achieve the overall outcomes of increased

life expectancy and reduced differences in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy

between communities. As part of the objective to “reduce the numbers of people living with

preventable ill health and people dying prematurely, while reducing the gap between

communities”, one of the indicators included relates to preventable sight loss:

Proportion of Certificate of Visual Impairment (CVI) registrations that are due to age related

macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy

There are a further four indicators in the framework which may also be assisted by

improvements in eye health:

• Falls and Injuries in the over 65s;

• Hip fractures in the over 65s;

• Self reported well being;

• Health related quality of life for older people.

12

2.3 NHS outcomes framework 2013/14

The NHS Outcomes Framework sets five "domains" through which the effectiveness of

health care will be measured:

• Domain 1 Preventing people from dying prematurely

• Domain 2 Enhancing quality of life for people with long-term conditions

• Domain 3 Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury

• Domain 4 Ensuring that people have a positive experience of care

• Domain 5 Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them

from avoidable harm

The UK Vision Strategy Project Team state that reducing avoidable sight loss and improving

eye health contributes to each of these, either directly or indirectly.9

2.4 Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) Programme

The Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) was initiated by the Department

of Health to provide a central resource of evidence showing how to improve quality whilst

making efficiency savings.10

Ophthalmology is an area which may benefit from development under the Quality Innovation

Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) programme. There is scope to optimise use of the

available workforce and improve treatment pathways for patients as outlined by the National

Eyecare Steering Group 1st Report.11

2.5 NHS England ‘Call to Action’: Improving eye health and reducing

sight loss

In 2014, NHS England launched a consultation exercise focused on improving eye health

and the provision of NHS eye health services, specifically early accurate detection by

primary services and effective management in the community. The work complements NHS

England’s wider ambitions to build primary care services at scale, and for NHS England and

CCGs to commission together where appropriate, focused on the needs of specific

communities.12 The consultation closed on September 12 2014 and seven key themes have

been identified:

1. IT and communication as a barrier to improving efficiency and quality of eye care;

2. Developing clinical leadership and changing organizational culture;

3. Developing pathways;

4. Making better use of existing skills and extending the scope and role of non-medical

personnel;

13

5. Reviewing General Ophthalmic Services and exploring new contractual opportunities;

6. Improving case management and more patient centric care;

7. Improving accessibility to sight tests, especially for at risk and vulnerable groups.

2.6 Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Clinical Priority

Programme

The RCGP selects clinical areas to raise their profile and increase awareness both within

general practice and across primary care. Each year the College selects a number of clinical

areas or aspects of care to become UK wide RCGP clinical priorities for between 3 and 5

years duration. Eye Health has been made a priority for April 2013-March 2016. The priority

aims to reduce preventable sight loss amongst the ageing population across the UK and

improve eye referral to eye care services of any patient with signs of “correctable” sight loss.

The priority will enable more patients with unpreventable sight loss to maintain their

independence for longer in addition to having measurable gains in other health indicators.13

2.7 WHO Vision 2020

Vision 2020 is a global initiative that aims to eliminate avoidable blindness by the year 2020.

It was launched on 18 February 1999 by the World Health Organization together with the

more than 20 international non-governmental organisations involved in eye care and

prevention and management of blindness that comprise the International Agency for the

Prevention of Blindness (IAPB). VISION 2020 is a partnership that provides guidance,

technical and resource support to countries that have formally adopted its agenda.14

Three objectives have been identified:

• Increase awareness, within key audiences, of the causes of avoidable blindness and

the solutions to the problem;

• Advocate for and secure the necessary resources to implement the WHO Global

Action Plan 2014-19; and

• Facilitate the planning, development and implementation of national VISION

2020/Eye Health programmes in all countries.

2.8 CCG Outcomes Framework/Local CCG priorities

The CCG outcomes indicators have been selected on the basis that they help contribute to

better outcomes across the five domains of the NHS Outcomes Framework (see Section

2.3). The indicators are useful for CCGs and Health and Wellbeing Boards in identifying local

priorities for quality improvement.

14

3. Population Characteristics of BNSSSG and Health Determinants

There are strong links between sight loss and other health determinants; these are therefore

an important consideration in assessing the needs of the population of BNSSSG in relation

to eye health.

Where data in this section are presented at BNSSSG level but available at CCG level, this

additional data is provided in Appendix 1.

3.1 Age

BNSSSG covers a population of approximately 1.46 million people. The prevalence of many

eye diseases increases with increasing age. Figure 2 presents population estimates from the

Office for National Statistics (ONS) for BNSSSG for 2014 and projections for 2030. The

proportion of people aged over 60 in BNSSSG in 2014 (24.9%) is higher than the England

average (22.9%). By 2030, it is predicted that the proportion of people aged over 60 in

BNSSSG will have risen to 29.9%. The proportion of people over 80 is expected to increase

by over 50% to 8.4%, which will be higher than the England average (7.5%).

Figure 2: Percentage population split by age in BNSSSG in a) 2014 and b) 2030

compared with England average (bold outlines)

Data source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

0 2 4 6 8

90+85-8980-8475-7970-7465-6960-6455-5950-5445-4940-4435-3930-3425-2920-2415-1910-14

5-90-4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2014

0 2 4 6 8

90+85-8980-8475-7970-7465-6960-6455-5950-5445-4940-4435-3930-3425-2920-2415-1910-14

5-90-4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2030

15

It should be noted that the combined profile for the whole of BNSSSG does conceal some

large differences in distribution of age between some localities. For example, the proportion

of the population aged over 60 in 2030 is estimated to range from 19.6% in Bristol to 36.9%

in Somerset.

3.2 Gender

Women have a longer life expectancy than men resulting in a higher number of women

affected by certain eye health conditions than men, such as AMD.

3.4 Ethnicity

Ethnicity has been identified as a risk factor for eye health and therefore consideration of the

different ethnic groups within BNSSSG is important (figure 3). People of African-Caribbean

origin have been found to be at an increased risk of developing glaucoma and the disease

can occur 10-15 years earlier.15,16 People of South Asian origin are at an increased risk of

diabetes and the associated eye condition, diabetic retinopathy, as well as early onset

cataract.17 The risk of developing diabetic retinopathy has been found to be 35 percent

higher than the risk in the white population.3

Figure 3: Percentage population split by ethnicity in BNSSSG

Data source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

White93.1%

Mixed1.8%

Asian or Asian British2.6%

Black or Black British2.1% Other ethnic group

0.4%

16

3.5 Lifestyle factors

Smoking has been associated with an increased risk for AMD and cataracts. Evidence

suggests people who smoke have double the risk of developing AMD than non-smokers and

tend to develop it earlier. Approximately one in five adults are smokers; smoking prevalence

in England in 2012 was 19.5%. Prevalence across the four CCGs in BNSSSG ranged from

14.8% in North Somerset to 21.3% in Bristol.

Obesity can increase the risk of developing several eye conditions, specifically; diabetic

retinopathy, due to an increase in developing type 2 diabetes, cataracts and dry AMD.

Obesity also increases the speed of progression of AMD.18,19 In BNSSSG, around one in five

adults are obese; the proportion of adults classified as obese above ranged from 21.1% in

South Gloucestershire to 23.4% in Bristol.

3.6 Deprivation

Populations where there are multiple deprivation indicators have been shown to be more

likely to present with eye disease later than others.20 This increases the risk of sight loss in

deprived areas.

Across BNSSSG, 152,000 people (11% of the population) live in the 20% most deprived

areas of England.. However, there are marked differences between the four CCGs, ranging

from 0.5% of the population in South Gloucestershire living in the most deprived areas to

25.9% of the population in Bristol living in the most deprived areas.

The exploration of the effect of deprivation on presentation and whether the population of

deprived areas is accessing services is more difficult. However, corresponding data that

would highlight whether people in these areas are accessing services when needed is not

readily available.

3.7 Co-morbidities

Sight loss is also associated with a number of other co-morbidities, for example stroke,

neurological conditions, blood pressure, learning disabilities, dementia, falls and depression.

Furthermore, self care for other systemic conditions is likely to be affected21 resulting in

poorer health outcomes for these patients than those who are not visually impaired. In

BNSSSG, 20.4% of the total number of people registered as blind or partially sighted were

also recorded as having an additional disability, equating to 1,540 people in the area. Of

these, 53% reported a physical disability, 20% were hard of hearing and an additional 9%

reported being deaf, 11% reported a learning disability and 8% reported a mental health

issue. Overall, 70% were aged 65 years or over.

17

3.7.1 Learning disabilities

Visual impairments are more common among people with learning disabilities, especially

people with more severe learning disabilities; adults with a learning disability are 10 times

more likely to be blind or partially sighted.22 The presence of visual impairments can

significantly impair the independence and quality of life of people with learning disabilities.22

In 2014, there were 5,480 people in England registered as blind or partially sighted and

recorded as having a learning disability. However, this is likely to be an underestimate the

actual number, due to issues regarding registration data and its validity (see Section 4:

Incidence and Prevalence of Partial Sight and Blindness) as well as a lack of recognition of

deteriorating sight and issues with communicating any deterioration.23

Given the lack of robust data on the prevalence of visual impairments among people with

learning disabilities in the UK, a Department of Health report22 has used evidence from

Denmark and the Netherlands to predict prevalence in the UK. The report estimates there

are approximately 65,000 people with learning disabilities who are known to services in the

UK to have visual impairment (partial sight loss and blindness); 23,000 children and 42,000

adults, far higher than the number registered. In addition, whilst it is assumed that all

children with learning disabilities are known to education services, not all adults with learning

disabilities are thought to be known to adult health or social care learning disability services.

Therefore, the report estimates there may be an additional 55,000 adults with learning

disabilities and visual impairment. The report also predicts that these figures are likely to rise

by approximately 0.5% each year over the next 20 years.

In 2014, there were 170 people registered blind or partially sighted in BNSSSG who also

reported a learning disability. The actual number, however, is likely to be higher given that

the number of people registered as blind or partially sighted is thought to be far lower that

the actual number living with sight loss as discussed earlier.

In BNSSSG, there were 5,771 adults (18+) with learning disabilities known to GPs and 3735

adults (18-64 years) with learning disabilities known to local authorities in 2011/12. Each

year, GPs are supposed to offer regular health checks to people known to have a learning

disability. In 2011/12, the proportion of adults (18+) with a learning disability eligible for an

annual health check with their GP, who received a health check was 70%.

This data highlights that not only are there likely to be a number of people in BNSSSG who

have a learning disability and are not known to services and therefore may not be receiving

appropriate health care, but of those that are known, 30% do not receive their annual health

18

check to ensure health problems, such as visual impairment are appropriately diagnosed

and treated.

3.7.2 Dementia

The risk of dementia and sight loss both increase independently with age, therefore

inevitably there will be people affected by both conditions; and this is likely to increase given

the ageing population. Evidence suggests the effect of having both serious sight loss and

dementia at the same time is much more severe than the difficulties caused by either

condition alone.24 In addition, since sight loss symptoms may cause similar symptoms to

progression of dementia (e.g. decrease in interest in reading/television, loss of confidence,

confusion and visual hallucinations), the deterioration is often misdiagnosed as a worsening

of dementia rather than sight loss. Over 9,000 people aged 65 and over are estimated to be

living with dementia in BNSSSG; this ranged from 1,392 people in South Gloucestershire to

4,132 people in Somerset.

3.7.3 Falls

Visual impairment is an important risk factor for falls in older people;25 older people with

visual impairment are 1.7 times more likely to have a fall.26 There are approximately 68,000

falls in people aged 65 and over across BNSSSG each year; of these, around 8% (5,500)

are estimated to occur amongst those with sight loss. Of these 8%, almost half (around

2,600) are estimated to have been directly attributable to sight loss. Serious falls are those

requiring hospital admission; there are an estimated 208 falls which are directly attributable

to sight loss and require hospital treatment.

3.7.4 Depression

There is also an increased risk of depression in older people with visual impairment, with a

rate of 13.5 per cent, as compared to 4.6 per cent in the general population.27 Reducing

avoidable sight loss therefore is important for reducing depression and improving well-being,

but there must also be a focus on ensuring blind and partially sighted people have access to

emotional support and rehabilitation services from the point of diagnosis onwards.28

Relieving depression and social isolation are therefore vital; services should include social

opportunities (e.g. swimming clubs or social drop in). Furthermore, counselling services offer

an important opportunity to ensure those newly diagnosed have the appropriate support.

3.7.5 Stroke

Almost 70% of people who experience strokes will also experience some form of vision

dysfunction.29 However, existing evidence suggests 45% of stroke services provide no

formal vision assessment for stroke patients.30 Given that there are an estimated 6,689

19

people aged 65 and over in BNSSSG who have had a stroke, there may be 4,682 people in

BNSSSG who have experienced some form of vision dysfunction following a stroke.

20

4. Incidence and Prevalence of Partial Sight and Blindness

Where data in this section are presented at BNSSSG level but available at CCG level, this

additional data is provided in Appendix 1.

A Certification of Vision Impairment (CVI) formally certifies a person as either sight impaired

(partially sighted) or severely sight impaired (blind). Each CVI form is completed by a

consultant ophthalmologist in an eye clinic, with a copy being sent to the local social services

department which provides a formal route to social care services.31 Although it is the formal

route to social care services, it should be noted that people who are visually impaired often

need support well before the time of registration.

The total number of new CVIs issued in BNSSSG in 2012/13 was 557. The rate per 100,000

population ranged from 25.6 in South Gloucestershire to 51.2 in Somerset, which is above

the England average (42.3 per 100,000). The rate of CVIs in England for 2012/13, was

similar to the rates reported for 2010/11 and 2011/12 (42.7 and 44.5 respectively)Within

BNSSSG, the rates differed more markedly by year for the four local authorities; for

example, the rate for Somerset was 63.0 per 100,000 in 2010/11, 57.1 in 2011/12 and 51.2

in 2012/13. Year on year comparison of CVI data by local authority should be interpreted

with caution due to the small numbers involved and natural yearly variation. An analysis of

time trends may help to understand the year on year differences better.

Upon receipt of a completed Certification of Vision Impairment form, a social services

department offers registration and other relevant advice and support; registration is not

automatic and not everybody that has been certified as having a visual impairment is

recorded on a local authority register. Those that register become eligible for certain

concessions. Registers of blind and partially sighted people are generally maintained by

local authorities, however, in North Somerset, the local authority commission Vision North

Somerset to maintain this information on their behalf.

In the most recently published data (up to March 2014), there were around 290,000 people

registered blind or partially sighted in England. In BNSSSG, there were 7,565 registered

cases (table 1). In line with national data, the number of registrations in BNSSSG has been

falling in recent years (there were 320 fewer registrations in 2014 compared to 2011). There

are several possible explanations for this observation; for example, it could be an artefact, as

a result of issues with registration (see further explanation later in this section) or it could be

due to the availability of treatment for wet AMD. Approximately one quarter of registrations

are in people aged 64 or under and around one-fifth are recorded as having an additional

21

disability (see section 3.7.1). Of the total number registered in 2014, 540 were newly

registered in the previous 12 months.

Table 1: Number of people in BNSSSG registered as blind or partially sighted

(March 2014)

Year All Cases

Total Blind Partial Sight

2008 6,985 3,665 3,320

2011 7,885 3,810 4,075

2014 7,565 3,640 3,925

Data source: Source: Health & Social Care Information Centre www.hscic.gov.uk

*All data are rounded to the nearest 5

These figures are likely to be an underestimate of people with sight impairment and are

unlikely to be truly representative of all people living with sight loss in the area as not all

patients who qualify for registration choose to be registered. There are several reasons for

this, including concerns about it adversely affecting their ability to find work, the stigma of

being labelled as visually impaired or the perception that there would be little benefit to the

individual, for example, they may already access support services without it or registration is

not seen as a formal gateway to social care and rehabilitation. Certification may also be

overlooked when engaged in resolving the medical issues relating to treatment of eye

disease.

Due to the known issues with this data, estimates have been generated for the number of

people living with sight loss. Estimates for 2011, suggest there were nearly 1.9 million

people living with sight loss in the UK and this is expected to increase by 22% by 2020 and

to double to 3.9million people by 2050.

In BNSSSG, it is estimated there are 46,080 people living with sight loss (almost six times as

many as those registered) and 5630 of these are living with severe sight loss (blindness).

The estimated prevalence of sight loss in BNSSSG is therefore 3.2%, similar to the South

West (3.5%) and national (3%) prevalence. If the percentage increase is similar to that

projected for the UK, BNSSSG can expect to have at least 56,770 people living with sight

loss by 2020 and 72,880 by 2030.

22

Table 2: Number of people estimated to be living with sight loss in BNSSSG,

2011 and 2030

Year All Cases

Total Blind Partial Sight

2011 46,080 5,630 40,450

2030 72,880 9,540 63,340

Data source: RNIB Sight Loss Data Tool Version 2 www.rnib.org.uk

Given the importance of age as a risk factor for eye visual impairment and the

impact that population demographics could have on future needs (see Section

3.1 Age), understanding future prevalence by age is vital (table 3). Projections

suggest that people aged over 75 years with moderate or serious visual

impairment is likely to increase by 60% between now and 2030 and is expected

to increase by 20% for those aged 65-74 years.

Table 3: Current and future estimates of the number of people with visual

impairment in BNSSSG, by age group

2014 2015 2020 2025 2030

People predicted to have a serious visual impairment

18-24 years 88 88 85 83 93

25-34 years 125 126 132 133 127

35-44 years 118 118 119 127 132

45-54 years 132 133 128 117 118

55-64 years 110 110 122 131 125

People predicted to have a moderate or serious visual impairment

65-74 years 8416 8630 9089 9056 10125

75 + years 16156 16492 19096 23225 25966

People predicted to have registrable eye conditions

75 + years 8338 8512 9856 11987 13402

Data sources: Projecting Older People Population Information (POPPI) and Projecting

Adult Needs and Service Information (PANSI)

23

5. Cost of eye care

The costs of visual impairment are high and include not only the direct costs associated with

healthcare (e.g. diagnosis and treatment), but also the indirect costs such as unpaid care,

adaptations and unemployment.

Whilst data is available on healthcare expenditure, quantifying the indirect costs relating to

eye health is complex. One report has suggested that for the estimated 1.8million visually

impaired people in the UK in 2008, costs were £6.5billion.3 The direct costs (£2.2billion)

contained in this calculation were predominantly due to hospital care (£1.1billion) and

spending on residential and community care services (£304million) whilst a further

£25million was attributed to the costs of injurious falls. The indirect costs (£4.3billion) were

predominantly due to informal care costs accounted (£2billion) and lower employment

(£1.6billion); the cost of devices and adaptations required to facilitate daily living was

calculated to be £336.5million. The total cost associated with the burden of disease, which

included the burden of disability in terms of reduced quality of life (measured in disability

adjusted life years) and years of life lost due to premature death was estimated at

£15.5billion.

Programme budgeting benchmarking data are available for all CCGs, detailing a breakdown

of expenditure across 23 programmes of care and 12 care settings, such as outpatient and

community for the year 2012/13. Data on expenditure of programme budgeting category

“Problems with vision” for the four CCGs within BNSSSG are presented in table 4. In

2012/13, Bristol, North Somerset and Somerset spent around two-thirds of their expenditure

on secondary care and just over a quarter on primary care, whilst South Gloucestershire

spent around 45% of their expenditure on each.

For BNSSSG, total healthcare expenditure on problems of vision in 2012/13 was £58.4

million, whilst the indirect cost of sight loss for BNSSSG have been estimated at £130

million. It should be noted that programme budgeting benchmarking data are collated by

Area Teams and provided by those commissioning services; its validity and usefulness

therefore is reliant on accurate coding and reporting and this should be borne in mind when

interpreting the data.

24

Table 4: Expenditure on own population (total and £million per 100,000), BNSSSG, 2012/13

Expenditure on own

population

(£million)

Expenditure

(£million per

100,000 population)

Proportion (%)

of total

expenditure

Bristol 17.2 3.78 2.2

North Somerset 10.5 4.98 2.9

Somerset 23.8 4.64 2.6

South Gloucestershire 6.9 3.22 1.7

National average - 4.35 -

Data source: Programme budgeting data, NHS England, http://www.england.nhs.uk/resources/resources-for-ccgs/prog-budgeting/

25

6. Eye conditions

The major sight conditions in the UK are age-related macular degeneration (AMD),

glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and cataracts.3 Uncorrected refractive error also cause

registrable levels of visual impairment which may need to be resolved with appropriate

treatment, whilst low visions services are an important area of commissioning. These six

areas will be discussed in this section, however it should be highlighted that there are a

number of other important areas relevant to eye health, such as emergency eye care,

surgery and cancer. It was not possible to obtain data on these areas within the necessary

timescales, however these areas should be addressed locally.

6.1 Age related macular degeneration

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of certifiable visual loss in the

UK. There are two main types: “dry” and “wet” (see Glossary of eye conditions, page 36).

Risk factors for AMD include smoking, increasing age and most significantly a family history.

Data for 2012/13 show that 46% of new CVIs were attributed to AMD in people aged 65

years or over. This is higher than the national average (42%). Table 5 presents data on new

CVIs (total number and rate per 100,000 population) in people aged 65 years and over for

the last three years. Bristol is the only area which has seen an increase in rate over the last

three years, though the small numbers associated with this data should be noted.

Additionally, the issues discussed previously with regard to the CVIs being an underestimate

of actual incidence apply again here.

Table 5: New Certifications of Visual Impairment (CVI) due to age related macular

degeneration (AMD) aged 65+, rate per 100,000 population

2010/11 2011/12 2012/13

No. Rate per

100,000 No.

Rate per

100,000 No.

Rate per

100,000

Bristol 32 57.5 38 67.8 53 92.7

North Somerset 39 92.9 39 90.6 36 80.4

Somerset 151 136.7 138 122.4 140 119.2

South Gloucestershire 26 59.5 30 67.0 27 57.9

Data source: Public Health Outcomes Framework

26

Table 6 presents estimates of AMD, “wet” AMD, “dry” AMD and drusen for BNSSSG. The

data have been calculated using the National Eye Health Epidemiological Model (NEHEM)

and population estimates for 2011 from ONS. The estimates take into account the difference

in prevalence observed among different age groups, sexes and ethnic group.

Table 6: Estimated numbers and prevalence (in population aged 50+) of AMD in

BNSSSG, by CCG

NV-AMD (wet)

Geographic Atrophy (dry)

Drusen

No. %

population aged 50+

No. %

population aged 50+

No. %

population aged 50+

Bristol 2,183 1.82 1,060 0.89 13,479 11.26

North Somerset 1,610 1.93 788 0.94 9,824 11.77

Somerset 4,230 1.90 2,065 0.93 25,955 11.68

South Gloucestershire 1,561 1.69 761 0.82 10,283 11.13

BNSSSG 9,584 1.85 4,674 0.90 59,541 11.50

Data source: National Eye Health Epidemiological Model and ONS

There are an estimated 14,258 cases of wet or dry AMD in BNSSSG. Approximately one

third are dry AMD, for which there is no cure or treatment. The remaining two-thirds are wet

AMD, for which anti VEGF drugs can slow the progression of the disease.

The presence of a few small drusen is normal with advancing age and drusen alone do not

usually cause vision loss. However, the presence of larger and more numerous drusen in

the macula is a common early sign of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).4 Although

there is no beneficial treatment for drusen, diet and AREDS 2ii formulation supplements are

advised. The NEHEM model estimates that there could be nearly 60,000 people with drusen

in BNSSSG, which means there may be as many as 70,000 people with some form of AMD.

As there is no effective treatment, cases of dry AMD are usually monitored by optometrists

when patients attend for routine sight testing. Patients are referred if wet AMD develops

concurrently with the dry or if the level of vision is reduced such that referral for CVI

registration or hospital low vision aid services is required. Because these cases are

monitored in this way, the total number of cases of dry AMD known to eye care services is

ii AREDS2 formulation is a nutritional supplement that can reduce the risk of developing advanced AMD. It was developed by rresearchers at the National Institutes of Health’s National Eye Institute (https://www.nei.nih.gov/areds2/MediaQandA)

27

unknown.

It is not clear from local hospital episode statistics what proportion of patients seen has wet

AMD. In addition, coding of outpatient data is not detailed enough to allow us to determine

the proportion of cases of all types of macular degeneration known to local health services.

6.2 Glaucoma

Glaucoma is an asymptomatic disease (in its early stages) that damages the optic nerve and

can lead to blindness. Risk factors include increasing age, family history, ethnicity and

ocular hypertension. Sight loss in glaucoma is not reversible, however the onset of

glaucoma is gradual and the condition can be treated with medication, laser or filtration

surgery. Ocular hypertension (OHT) is an additionally important condition to measure as

patients diagnosed with OHT are at increased risk of developing glaucoma and therefore

require ongoing monitoring.

New CVIs due to glaucoma in people aged 40 years and over is an indicator in the Public

Health Outcomes Framework and the data show that there are 80-100 new CVIs in

BNSSSG each year (table 7).

Table 7: New Certifications of Visual Impairment (CVI) due to glaucoma aged 40+, rate

per 100,000 population

2010/11 2011/12 2012/13

No. Rate per

100,000 No.

Rate per

100,000 No.

Rate per

100,000

Bristol 17 9.8 20 11.4 30 17.0

North Somerset 16 14.1 15 13.1 17 14.7

Somerset 43 14.5 43 14.3 15 12.8

South Gloucestershire 8 6.0 12 8.9 39 10.9

Data source: Public Health Outcomes Framework

Given the known issues with CVI registrations, as discussed previously, data on glaucoma

are presented in table 8 using estimates from NEHEM and population estimates for 2011.

Data are presented on: the number of glaucoma cases, glaucoma suspects (defined as

those who had an absolute field defect and either a cup:disc ratio of >=0.5 but <0.7 or

asymmetry of >=0.2 but <0.3) and number of people with OHT. The NEHEM model

estimates there are around 15,000 glaucoma cases in BNSSSG and a further 52,000

28

suspects. In addition, there could be as many as 28,000 people with OHT who are at risk of

glaucoma.

Table 8: Expected number of glaucoma cases in BNSSSG

Estimated glaucoma cases Suspected glaucoma cases Ocular Hypertension (% population

30+) High Low Mean (%

population 30+)

<60 years

60+ years

Total (% population

30+)

Bristol 5,179 2,391 3,678

(1.52%) 8,297 5,316

13,614 (5.63%)

7,741 (3.20%)

North Somerset 3,302 1,452 2,314

(1.69%) 3,992 4,010

8,002 (5.84%)

4,388 (3.20%)

Somerset 8,652 3,796 6,077

(1.71%) 10,182 10,568

20,750 (5.85%)

11,347 (3.20%)

South Gloucestershire

3,514 1,548 2,479

(1.48%) 5,378 4,211

9,589 (5.72%)

5,367 (3.20%)

BNSSSG 20,647 9,187 14,548 (1.61%)

27,849 24,105 51,955 (5.76%)

28,843 (3.20%)

Data source: National Eye Health Epidemiological Model and ONS

It is likely that the NEHEM estimates are an underestimate of prevalence as the definition of

glaucoma used is more likely to pick up more advanced cases and miss early cases with

subtle changes. An equity profile produced by Bradford and Airedale PCT suggests that

NEHEM may underestimate the prevalence of glaucoma by 1.5 to 2 times.

In an attempt to more accurately define the number of known glaucoma cases in the area

the general ophthalmic services statistics relating to sight tests were considered as patients

with glaucoma and their close relative aged 40 and over are entitled to an annual NHS sight

test. Unfortunately, available published statistics group together patients with glaucoma with

those that have diabetes and therefore it is not possible to tell what proportion of the sight

test carried out in diabetic/glaucoma sufferers were due to glaucoma. Even so, this

information still provides important information on people eligible to receive NHS eye tests;

in 2013/14, 10.4% of all NHS sight tests (equating to 36,766 tests) were on

diabetics/glaucoma sufferers. The number of tests in this eligibility category has increased

over the last six years (from 18, 249 tests in 2007/08) and is a likely reflection of increases in

both diabetic and glaucoma sufferers aged 40 years and over. Additionally, in 2013/14,

36,982 tests (10.5%) were carried out on close relatives of glaucoma sufferers.

29

6.3 Cataract

A cataract is the clouding of the eye’s natural lens. The cataract can increase in size and

density over time and cloud more of the lens, therefore reducing vision. Risk factors for age-

related cataracts include hereditary factors, increasing age, smoking, diabetes and ultraviolet

light exposure. Cataract prevalence as determined by NEHEM is based on clinical need and

therefore is an estimate of “surgical” cataract; it is therefore more likely to be representative

of the need for cataract services locally. A surgical cataract is a cataract that is also causing

patient symptoms and therefore extraction is more likely to be beneficial. The prevalence of

non-symptomatic cataract is likely to be higher but not necessarily of interest as treatment is

not indicated.

Base prevalence estimates, provided by NEHEM, were applied to the 2011 census

population data for each of the areas in BNSSSG, with data presented in table 9. The base

prevalence data are based on a study involving 2,783 residents in Somerset and Avon and

therefore the results are considered generalisable to BNSSSG. The data suggest there were

almost 14,650 people living with cataracts in the area in 2011.

Table 9: Estimated prevalence of surgical cataract

Cataract prevalence estimate No. (% population 40+)

Bristol 3,334 (1.90%)

North Somerset 2,443 (2.15%)

Somerset 6,441 (2.15%)

South Gloucestershire 2,425 (1.80%)

BNSSSG 14,643 (2.03%)

Data source: National Eye Health Epidemiological Model and RNIB Sight Loss Data Tool

Analysis of HES inpatient data provides an estimate of demand for healthcare services

(table 10). Fifty-seven percent of all ophthalmic inpatient admissions in 2012/13 had the

main diagnosis recorded as cataracts (coded as: senile cataracts and other cataracts).

Fourteen percent of these diagnoses were in patients aged 64 years and under. In-patient

data are considered more robust than outpatients because payment for procedures under

payment by results relies on accurate coding of these procedures. Patients undergoing day

case procedures such as cataract are “admitted” and are therefore covered by inpatient

data.

30

Table 10: Number of ophthalmic inpatient admissions with cataracts* as the main

diagnosis, 2012/13

No. of ophthalmic admissions

Senile cataracts

Other cataracts

Total cataracts (% of all

ophthalmic admissions)

Bristol 3,608 1,469 405 1874 (51.9%)

North Somerset 2,199 946 365 1311 (59.6%)

Somerset 6,858 930 3,256 4186 (61.0%)

South Gloucestershire 2,396 716 517 1233 (51.5%)

BNSSSG 15,061 4,061 4,543 8,604 (57.1%)

Data source: Hospital Episodes Statistics Data, HSCIC *Defined as: senile cataract and other cataract

6.4 Diabetic eye disease

Diabetic retinopathy is a complication of diabetes and usually affects both eyes. Having

been the leading cause of blindness in working age people over the last 50 years, it has

recently been overtaken by inherited retinal disorders.32 However, it remains an important

cause of certifiable blindness and highlights the importance of screening, which may be one

of the causes for this change. Often there are no early symptoms and the disease responds

well to early intervention. Effective management of diabetes can help prevent the onset and

progression of diabetic retinopathy. Treatment can also involve laser surgery, vitrectomy and

anti-VEGF drugs.

New Certifications of Visual Impairment (CVI) due to diabetic eye disease in people aged 12

and over is an indicator in the Public Health Outcomes Framework. However, the numbers

are very small (around 25 for BNSSSG in 2012/13). Given the current and ongoing rise of

diabetes in the UK,33 diabetic retinopathy is expected to have a major impact of eye services

in the future.

Estimates for diabetes prevalence suggest there were 89,646 adults in BNSSSG living with

diabetes in 2011 and this was expected to rise to 99,409 by 2020; this is an 11% rise over

the nine year period, higher than the estimated national increase (9.8%). If a similar

percentage increase is observed in terms of prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, the

estimated number of people with the condition is predicted to increase from 25,101 in 2011

31

to 27,834 in 2020, suggesting there will be almost 3000 more people living with diabetic

retinopathy across BNSSSG (these estimates are based on applying base prevalence rates

for diabetes to population estimates).

Diabetic retinopathy screening is an effective way of detecting the disease as early as

possible. Therefore, a national screening programme for England was established in 2003.

All people aged 12 and over and with diabetes (type 1 or 2) are offered annual screening

appointments. Screening is provided in a variety of locations, including GP surgeries,

hospitals and opticians’ practices.34 There are two diabetic eye screening programmes within

BNSSSG. These are: Bristol and Weston Diabetic Eye Screening Programme and Somerset

Diabetic Eye Screening Programme.

For 2011/12, the proportion of patients who were invited to and attended a retinal screening

appointment varied across BNSSSG: Bristol, 83.3%; North Somerset, 87.4%, South

Gloucestershire, 84.2% and Somerset, 92.3%. More recent data available for April-June

2013 for each screening programme showed uptake was 79.2% for Bristol and Weston

Diabetic Eye Screening Programme and 87.7% for Somerset Diabetic Eye Screening

Programme (England average: 82.8%). Over the two areas, a total of 57,363 people were

invited for screening and 47,278 took up the offer.

6.5 Low vision

This refers to people who have some useful vision which can often be improved with low

vision aids and adaptations. Low vision services may be based in a local hospital, located in

opticians' practices or offered from a resource centre run by the local society for people with

sight loss.35

Low vision estimates were calculated using NEHEM and population estimates for 2011

(table 11). The model calculates the prevalence of visual impairment overall (binocular visual

acuity <6/18), which was categorized into low vision (binocular acuity <6/18-3/60) or severe

sight impairment (binocular acuity <3/60).36 The model suggests there could be around

19,000 people in BNSSSG with low vision.

32

Table 11: Estimates of low vision, BNSSSG

Impaired vision

(binocular acuity

<6/18)

Low vision

(binocular acuity

<6/18 to 3/60)

Severe sight

impairment

(binocular acuity <3/60)

No. % 50+

population No.

% 50+

population No.

% 50+

population

Bristol 5,141 4.30 4,362 3.65 786 0.66

North Somerset 3,753 4.50 3,182 3.81 572 0.69

Somerset 9,868 4.44 8,369 3.77 1,505 0.68

South Gloucestershire

3,681 3.98 3,139 3.40 545 0.59

BNSSSG 22,443 4.33 19,052 3.68 3,408 0.66

Data source: National Eye Health Epidemiological Model (NEHEM)

Low vision services should provide appropriate advice about low vision aids, lighting,

rehabilitation support (including mobility; e.g. long cane training to remain independent) and

information about the condition and support available. Low vision aids include both optical

low vision aids (e.g. magnifiers and binoculars) and non-optical low-vision aids (e.g.

anglepoise lamp and bold print books). Low vision support and rehabilitation are vital for

enabling independence and improving quality of life, including impacting on other areas of

health, such as reduction of injurious falls and depression.

6.6 Uncorrected refractive error

Refractive errors refer to the focusing errors of short sight (myopia), long sight (hyperopia)

and astigmatism. All of these conditions give rise to blurred images on the retina unless

corrected.

It is estimated that 6% of children at age 6-7years and 10% of children at age 12-13 may

have a refractive error.37 Not all of these children will present with symptoms or be found at

school entry screening.37

In adults, there is little data for those aged between 18 and 30 years. For adults aged 30-70,

it is estimated 40% will have a refractive error.38,39 A proportion of these will already visited

the optometrist and been advised to wear spectacles. However, this 40% will also include a

number who do not have regular sight tests and do not wear spectacles.

It is estimated that 12.5% of visual impairment in the older population is due to refractive

error.5 Taking into account the overall prevalence of visual impairment this would indicate

33

that 2-7% have vision of less than 6/12 because they either don’t have or don’t wear

appropriate spectacles.

Data in table 12 use these prevalence estimates from the literature to estimate the number

of people affected in BNSSSG. Note that for children and working age people, the estimates

include corrected error in addition to uncorrected area (due to inclusion in the studies). And

therefore include those that already wear appropriate correction. However, the estimates for

the over 60s are only for uncorrected error.

Table 12: Estimated prevalence of refractive error in BNSSSG

Refractive Error Children

(< 16 years)

Working age

(16-60 years) Over 60s

Predicted corrected & uncorrected

error

15,847-26,412

(6-10%)

338,223

(40%) -

Predicted uncorrected error only - - 6,810-23,835

(2-7%)

Data source: Based on data from Future Insight: Eye Health Needs Assessment for Greater

Manchester, Sarah Slade1

Based on the estimates from the literature, it is estimated that there may be 15,847-26,412

children and 338,223 people of working age in BNSSSG who have some degree of

refractive error. Some of these will already have spectacles or contact lenses and others

may not. In the older population, we can isolate those who are likely to be uncorrected from

those already wearing spectacles. Between 6,810 and 23,835 of BNSSSG over 60s are

likely to be coping with a level of vision impairment that reduce their performance of

everyday tasks, yet which could be remedied with suitable spectacles.

Sight tests are the only way to reliably detect and fully correct refractive errors (see section

9.1 Sight tests).

34

7. Children and Young People

The information in this section is designed to give a brief overview of eye health in children

and children’s eye services. It is not intended to be a full review and should be

supplemented with local data.

Although incidence of visual impairment in children is low, the impact of such a condition is

high. The causes of vision impairment in childhood are generally different to the causes of

sight loss in adults. The four most common causes are: cerebral vision impairment, optic

nerve disorders, retinal or macular dystrophies and congenital cataracts. Children most at

risk of vision impairment are:

• Premature and low birth weight babies;

• Genetic eye conditions;

• Maternal infections (e.g. measles and rubella);

• Maternal alcohol and drug exposure;

• Maternal smoking;

• Children with learning disabilities.

Children with vision impairment have different needs from adults with sight loss. Significant

vision impairment can delay early childhood development and learning; including social

communication, mobility, and everyday living skills. Children with vision impairment are at

risk of poor outcomes across a range of emotional and social wellbeing indicators,40 which

can have an effect on adult life, limiting work opportunities.41 It can also have a major impact

on the wellbeing and coping capacities of the family. It is therefore vital that support is

provided from birth, throughout childhood and the transition into adulthood.35

The number of children registered blind or partially sighted (rounded to the nearest 5), as of

March 2014 are shown in table 13. The table also presents data on children with special

education needs (SEN). Children with SEN who are known to visual impairment services are

recorded by the local authority. Data are presented on the number of pupils who are

recorded as having a primary SEN of visual impairment (as at January 2013).

35

Table 13: Number of children registered blind or partially sighted, by March 2014* and

number of pupils with visual impairment as primary SEN**

Blind Partially sighted Total number of pupils with visual

impairment as primary SEN

0 to 4 5 to 17 0 to 4 5 to 17

Bristol 50 45 60 100 39

North Somerset 5 5 5 10 16

Somerset 5 25 5 35 34

South Gloucestershire 0 0 0 0 36

*All data are rounded to the nearest 5

**SEN: Special Education Needs.

Given the known issues with the registration data, the data presented in table 13 are likely to

be an underestimate. By applying base prevalence rates (0.05% for blind and 0.15% for

partially sighted) to population statistics from 2011, it is estimated that figures in table 13

may be a more likely reflection of children living with sight loss in BNSSSG. Whilst estimates

for Bristol appear to be similar to (or even an underestimate of) the number actually

registered, estimates for the remaining three areas of BNSSSG are far higher than actual

numbers registered. The prevalence of vision impairment is significantly higher in children

with learning difficulties than in the overall child population.22 Data on learning disabilities and

vision impairment alone are not available, however registered data and estimates of vision

impairment and any disability (including mental health problems, learning disability, physical

disability and hearing impairment) are available. Approximately 12.5% of children registered

blind or partially sighted are also registered with additional disabilities. In contrast, estimates

based on the literature suggest that around 50% of children could have an additional

disability (table 14).

Table 14: Estimated number of children who are blind or partially sighted

Blind

(0-16 years)

Partially sighted

(0-16 years)

Total (0-16 years)

Additional disabilities

(% total)

Bristol 42 125 167 84 (50%)

North Somerset 20 59 79 40 (51%)

Somerset 51 152 203 102 (50%)

South Gloucestershire 27 80 97 54 (56%)

Data source: RNIB data tool

36

Early detection and treatment interventions are imperative to avoid preventable sight loss.

There are three key stages at which all children should be screened for ocular conditions

and vision impairment: the new-born examination; the 6 to 8 weeks review and the school-

entry vision check at the age of 4-5 years.35

37

8. Current Activities, Service Provision and Assets

This section gives a limited overview of service provision in BNSSSG. There is considerable

variation in local service provision and availability of relevant data. It is therefore intended

that local data should supplement this section (see section 8.4 for suggestions on additional

data).

8.1 Sight tests

Regular sight tests present an ideal opportunity to detect reduced vision and early signs of

eye disease so that corrective spectacles (if appropriate) or prompt treatment can be sought.

NHS sight tests are carried out by community optometrists under General Ophthalmic

Services. All people aged under 16 or under 19 years of age and in full-time education and

over 60 years of age are automatically entitled to NHS tests. Between these ages, NHS sight

tests may be obtained only if a person has diabetes or glaucoma or a close relative with

glaucoma or if they are in receipt of some government benefits e.g. tax or pension credits.

NHS sight tests currently account for an estimated 70% of all eye examinations.42

Table 15: NHS Sight tests per 100,000 population, 2013/14

NHS sight tests per 100,000

population all persons

BNSSSG 24,592

South of England 23,564

England 23,905

Data source: HSCIC www.hscic.gov.uk

The number of NHS sight tests carried out in BNSSSG is slightly higher than the rate for

both the South and England and England (table 15).

38

Table 16: Number and proportion of NHS sight tests taken up by children and adults

aged 60 years or over, BNSSSG, 2013/14

2013/14 Children

(under 16)

Aged 60 or

over

Number of NHS sight tests 61,083 159,478

Proportion of total population for that age group 23% 47%

Data source: Sight tests: HSCIC www.hscic.gov.uk ; Population data: ONS

The data suggest one-quarter of children aged under 16 had their sight tested during

2013/14. The proportion of people aged 60 or over taking up the offer of a free NHS eye test

is higher, however it is not possible to determine what proportion are not being tested as

adults aged 60-69 are eligible for a free eye test every two years, whilst those aged 70 and

over are eligible for a free eye test every year.

In addition to the detection of refractive error the sight test is used as a tool for opportunistic

detection of eye diseases e.g. Glaucoma. This is reflected in the inclusion of disease related

exemption categories for GOS sight tests. Sudden or significant changes in sight may

prompt a person to attend for an eye test as the first point of contact with health services.

However, more subtle disease changes may not produce noticeable symptoms in the early

stages so routine sight tests, in the absence of more formal targeted screening programmes,

are essential in the detection and early treatment of eye conditions.

8.2 Hospital activity

There are five main providers of secondary care for eye health in BNSSSG:

• Emersons Green NHS Treatment Centre;

• Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust;

• University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust;

• Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust;

• Shepton Mallet Treatment Centre

Table 17 presents data from Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) on the number of people

admitted to hospital in 2012/13 for which their primary diagnosis related to the eye and

adnexa, by provider.

39

Table 17: Finished admission episodes with a primary diagnosis of ‘Diseases of the

eye and adnexa (H00-H59)’, by main providers in BNSSSG, 2012/13

Provider No. of episodes

Emersons Green 1251

Taunton and Somerset 3250

University Hospitals Bristol 7694

Yeovil District Hospital 1058

Shepton Mallet Treatment Centre 1557

Data source: Hospital Episodes Statistics, HSCIC

In-patient data can provide additional detail on characteristics of patients and equity of

access. This analysis has not been undertaken.

8.3 Primary care and community services

A survey43 has revealed that many GPs in the UK are not confident in detecting early signs

of major eye diseases. Just one third (34.1%) of respondents were confident in diagnosing

symptoms or signs of age-related macular degeneration, with only half of GPs confident in

diagnosing diabetic retinopathy (48.8%), glaucoma (51.2%) or refractive error (49.3%). It is

potentially possible to extract consultations relating to eye disease from general practice

systems, but this is not a part of this needs assessment.

Across BNSSSG, there are a number of community eyecare services available. A list of

these enhanced services is provided below, though not all are available in every CCG:

• Cataract Referral;

• Glaucoma Repeat Readings;

• Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) Referral;

• Ocular Hypertension (OHT) Monitoring;

• Acute Community Eyecare Services (ACES).

Details of these schemes can be included in local needs assessments.

8.4 Additional information and data

The following would be a useful supplement to this section, if available:

• Local data on trends in hospital use and characteristics of those accessing services.

ICD codes required: H00-H59;

40

• Outpatient data (may not be suitable; depends on coding);

• Enhanced services;

• Low vision;

• Childhood vision screening;

• General Practice (GP) data;

• Adult social care (e.g. rehabilitation, befriending service, housing);

• Community Optomoetry services: local optometrists can provide enhanced services,

usually negotiated through Local Optical Committees;

• Education support services;

• Voluntary sector (e.g. rehabilitation, advice, support, employment, welfare rights,

independence).

9. Patient voice

Within the confines of this report, it was not possible to conduct patient and public

consultation. It is recommended that patient views are gathered prior to any decision

making.

41

10. Recommendations/priorities

This report presents a rapid health needs assessment of eye health in Bristol, North

Somerset, Somerset and South Gloucestershire, produced over a relatively short time frame.

Further work is needed, particularly in identifying relevant data for hospital activity and

primary care and in understanding local services and pathways and the community voice

aspect. However, based on this report, some initial recommendations have been identified.

The primary recommendation is that each local areas uses the data presented in this

report to inform their Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) with supplementary data

from local services.

From the data available, local areas should consider the following issues when

developing strategies and plans relating to eye health:

• Early detection is a priority. Provision and monitoring of effective schemes

promoting early detection, including promotion of regular eye sight tests and

awareness raising.

• Increasing ageing population on current service provision.

• Increase in diabetes on current service provision.

• Equity of access. This includes consideration of those living in deprived areas and

vulnerable groups, particularly those with learning disabilities.

• Good quality support services for those who have visual impairment and the

impact of visual impairment on their quality of life. This includes ensuring low vision

services offer a range of low vision options, e.g. lighting, low vision aids, rehabilitation

support and counselling. Additional consideration of co-morbidities linked to eye

health, e.g. reducing depression and social isolation.

• Mapping of eye health services (community, hospital, voluntary etc) to see how

they are being met and identify any gaps. Consideration of what models of service

delivery are needed.

• Identify areas of best practice to be shared locally and with the wider BNSSSG

network.

• Link with other relevant strategies and care pathways, e.g. falls, stroke.

42

11. Data sources

• Office for National Statistics population data

• RNIB data tool

• People registered as blind and partially sighted (HSCIC)

• Projecting Older People Population Information System (POPPI)

• Projecting Adult Needs and Service Information System (PANSI)

• Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) tool

• Programme budgeting benchmarking tool

• Future Sightloss UK reports for RNIB

• National Eye Health Epidemiological Model (NEHEM)

• General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) Activity Statistics (HSCIC)

• Diabetic retinopathy screening uptake

• Certificate of Vision Impairment, Moorfields Eye Hospital

• Hospital Episodes Statistics Inpatient Data (HSCIC)

43

12. Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Susan Hamilton for her guidance and feedback throughout the

development of this report and Ian Longden and Chrissie Edwards for their support and

valuable input.

The following key documents have been used to support the development of this report and

should be acknowledged:

• UK Vision Strategy: Eye health and sight loss; statistics and information for

developing a Joint Strategic Needs Assessment;

• Eye Care Needs Assessment for Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire

(BNSSG), Sarah Scott, September 2012;

• Future Insight: Eye Health Needs Assessment for Greater Manchester, Sarah Slade;

• Eye Health Needs Assessments for Somerset;

• Eye Health Needs Assessments for Norfolk.

44

13. References

1. Slade S. Future Insight: Eye Health Needs Assessment Greater Manchester

2. Millodot M, Laby DM. Dictionary of ophthalmology. Woburn, MA: Reed Educational and

Professional Publishing Ltd, 2002.(Guideline Ref ID: MILLODOT2002)

3. Access Economics for the RNIB. (2009) Future Sight Loss UK(1): The economic impact

of partial sight and blindness in the UK adult population.

http://www.rnib.org.uk/aboutus/Research/reports/prevention/Pages/fsluk1.aspx

4. Eye Care. Available at: http://www.eyecare-information-

service.org.uk/disorders/drusen.html

5. Tate R, Smeeth L, Evans J, Fletcher A, Owen C, Rudnicka A, 2005. The Prevalence of

Visual Impairment in the UK: A Review of the Literature. RNIB.

6. Cavanagh S, Chadwick K. Health Needs Assessment: A Practical Guide. [online] 2005.

London: NICE. Available at:

http://www.gserve.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/documents/Health_Needs_Assessment_A_Pra

ctical_Guide.pdf

7. UK Vision Strategy. What is the Strategy? [online] Available at:

http://www.vision2020uk.org.uk/ukvisionstrategy/page.asp?section=278&sectionTitle=W

hat+is+the+Strategy%3F. Accessed: 23/09/2014

8. Public Health England. Public Health Outcomes Framework. [online] Available at:

http://www.phoutcomes.info/. Accessed: 29/09/2014

9. UK Vision Strategy. Commissioning Guide for Eye Care and Sight Loss Services.

[online] Available at:

http://commissioningforeyecare.org.uk/commhome.asp?section=153&sectionTitle=Effec

tive+eye+care+commissioning. Accessed: 29/09/2014

10. NICE. Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP). [online] Available at:

https://www.evidence.nhs.uk/qipp. Accessed: 29/09/2014

11. Busby D, 2004. ‘First Report of the National Eye Health Steering Group’ London:

Department of Health DH/Optical policy/Shadow SHA Gateway ref 3170

12. NHS England. Improving eye health and reducing sight loss – A ‘Call to Action’. [online]

Available at: http://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/qual-clin-lead/calltoaction/eye-cta/.

Accessed: 29/09/2014

13. Royal College of General Practitioner’s. Eye Health. [online] Available at:

http://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/clinical-priorities.aspx. Accessed:

29/09/2014

14. Vision 2020. [online] Available at: http://www.vision2020uk.org.uk/. Accessed:

29/09/2014

15. The College of Optometrists. Britain’s Eye Health in Focus: a snapshot of consumer

attitudes and behavior towards eye health. [online] 2013. Available at:

http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-

summary.cfm/docid/A60DE8E4-B6CF-49ED-8E0FE694FCF4B426. Accessed:

01/10/2014

16. Racette. L., Wilson, M.R., Zangwill, L.M., Weinreb, R.N., Sample, P.A. Primary open-

angle glaucoma in blacks: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; May-Jun; 48(3):295-313.

45

17. Wormald, R.P., Basauri, E. Wright, L.A., Evans, J.R. The African Caribbean Eye Survey:

risk factors for glaucoma in a sample of African Caribbean people living in London.

Eye.1994; 8(3):315-20.

18. Rughani, S. The Vital Role of Optometry in Disease Detection. Optometry Today. 2012;

March 9th 41-4.

19. Hogg, R. Healthy Lifestyle Equals Healthier Eyes. Optometry Today. 2012; April 6th 41-

4.

20. Fraser S, Bunce C, Wormald R, Brunner E. Deprivation and Late Presentation of

Glaucoma: Case-control Study. British Medical Journal. 2001; 322(7287) 639-643.

21. Douglas G, Corcoran C and Pavey S. Network 1000, Opinions and Circumstances of

Visually Impaired People in Britain. 2006. Visual Impairment Centre for Teaching and

Research (VICTAR) School of Education, University of Birmingham.

22. Emerson, E., Robertson, J. The estimated prevalence of visual impairment among

people with learning disabilities in the UK. [online] 2011. Available at:

https://www.rnib.org.uk/sites/default/files/Emerson%20report.pdf. Accessed: 24/10/2014

23. Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB). Across the spectrum: learning disability and

sight loss. [online] Available at: http://www.rnib.org.uk/services-we-offer-advice-

professionals-nb-magazine-health-professionals-nb-features/across-spectrum.

Accessed: 24/10/2014

24. Thomas Pocklington Trust. Dementia and serious sightloss. [online] 2007. Available at:

http://www.pocklington-

trust.org.uk/Resources/Thomas%20Pocklington/Documents/PDF/Research%20Publicati

ons/OP11.pdf. Accessed: 24/10/2014

25. Legood, R., Scuffham, P., Cryer, C. Are we blind to injuries in the visually impaired? A

review of the literature. Inj Prev. 2002; 8:155-160.

26. Scuffham PA, Legood R, Wilson E, Kennedy-Martin T. Incidence and Cost of Injurious

Falls Associated with Visual Impairment. Visual Impairment Research. 2002; 4 1-14

27. Evans, J.R., Fletcher, A.E., Wormald, R.P. Depression and anxiety in visually impaired

older people, Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(2):283-288.

28. RNIB. Sight loss: a public health priority. 2014. [online] Available at:

http://www.rnib.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sight_loss_a%20public_health_priority.pdf.

Accessed: 15/10/2014

29. MacIntosh, C. Stroke re-visited: visual problems following stroke and their effect on

rehabilitation. Br Orthopt J. 2003; 60, 10-14

30. Rowe FJ. Who sees visual impairment following a stroke. Strabismus. 2010;18(2), 37-

40

31. RNIB. Sight loss data tool v2 – guidance notes. [online] Available at:

http://www.rnib.org.uk/knowledge-and-research-hub-key-information-and-statistics/sight-

loss-data-tool. Accessed: 15/10/2014

32. Liew G, Michaelides M, Bunce C. A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications

in England and Wales in working age adults (16–64 years), 1999–2000 with 2009–2010.

BMJ Open. 2014. Available at: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/2/e004015.full.

Accessed: 24/10/2014

33. Diabetes UK. Number of people diagnosed with diabetes reaches 3.2 million. [online]

2014. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org.uk/About_us/News/Number-of-people-

diagnosed-with-diabetes-reaches-32-million/. Accessed: 22/10/2014

34. NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme. [online] Available at:

http://diabeticeye.screening.nhs.uk/. Accessed: 22/10/2014

46

35. UK Vision Strategy: Eye health and sight loss; statistics and information for developing a

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment. [online] 2013. Available at:

http://www.commissioningforeyecare.org.uk/commhome.asp?section=175&sectionTitle=

Health+and+Wellbeing+Boards. Accessed: 22/10/2014

36. Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RP, NG ES, Stirling S, Smeeth L, Breeze E, Bulpitt

CJ, Nunes M, Jones D, Tulloch A. Prevalence of visual impairment in people aged 75

years and older in Britain: results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of

older people in the community. Br J Opthalmol. 2002; 86(7):795-800

37. O’Donoghue L, McClelland JF, Logan NS, Rudnicka AR, Owen CG, Saunders KJ.

Refractive Error and Visual Impairment in School Children in Northern Ireland” British

Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010; doi10.1136/bjo2009.176040

38. Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Noorul Hug DM, Johnson CJ. Prevalence of Refractive

Error in Bangladeshi Adults: Results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of

Bangladesh. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(6) 1150-60

39. Hyams SW, Pokotilo E, Shkurko G. Prevalence of Refractive Errors in Adults Over 40: A

Survey of 8102 Eyes. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1977; 61 428-48

40. Harris J, Keil S, Lord C and McManus S. Sight impaired at age seven: Secondary

analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study. 2012. RLSB, RNIB and NatCen Social

Research.

41. McManus S and Lord C. Circumstances of people with sight loss:secondary analysis of

Understanding Society and the Life Opportunities Survey. 2012. Natcen report for RNIB.

42. Optical Confederation. Optics at a Glance. [online] London: December 2011. Available

at: www.fodo.com

43. Royal College of General Practitioners. RCGP working to improve GP eye care

knowledge after survey reveals low GP confidence in diagnosing major eye conditions.

[online] 25/09/2014. Available at: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/news/2014/september/rcgp-

working-to-improve-gp-eye-care-knowledge.aspx Accessed: 24/10/2014

47

Appendix 1: Supplementary data

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH DETERMINANTS

Figure 1: Percentage population split by age in a) 2014 and b) 2030 compared with

England average (bold outlines). Data from ONS.

A. Bristol

B. North Somerset

C. Somerset

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0

90+85 to 8980 to 8475 to 7970 to 7465 to 6960 to 6455 to 5950 to 5445 to 4940 to 4435 to 3930 to 3425 to 2920 to 2415 to 1910 to 14

5 to 90 to 4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2014

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0

90+85-8980-8475-7970-7465-6960-6455-5950-5445-4940-4435-3930-3425-2920-2415-1910-14

5-90-4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2030

0 2 4 6 8

90+85-8980-8475-7970-7465-6960-6455-5950-5445-4940-4435-3930-3425-2920-2415-1910-14

5-90-4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2030

0 2 4 6 8

90+85 to 8980 to 8475 to 7970 to 7465 to 6960 to 6455 to 5950 to 5445 to 4940 to 4435 to 3930 to 3425 to 2920 to 2415 to 1910 to 14

5 to 90 to 4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2014

48

D. South Gloucestershire

0 2 4 6 8

90 and over85 to 8980 to 8475 to 7970 to 7465 to 6960 to 6455 to 5950 to 5445 to 4940 to 4435 to 3930 to 3425 to 2920 to 2415 to 1910 to 14

5 to 90 to 4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)2014

0 2 4 6 8

90+85-8980-8475-7970-7465-6960-6455-5950-5445-4940-4435-3930-3425-2920-2415-1910-14

5-90-4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2030

0 2 4 6 8 10

90 and over85 to 8980 to 8475 to 7970 to 7465 to 6960 to 6455 to 5950 to 5445 to 4940 to 4435 to 3930 to 3425 to 2920 to 2415 to 1910 to 14

5 to 90 to 4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2014

0 2 4 6 8

90+85-8980-8475-7970-7465-6960-6455-5950-5445-4940-4435-3930-3425-2920-2415-1910-14

5-90-4

%

Age

grou

p (y

ears

)

2030

49

Table 1: Percentage population split by age in a) 2014 and b) 2030 compared with

England average. Data from ONS.

A. Bristol

B. North Somerset

C. Somerset

2014 2030 2014 2030

0 to 4 7.0 6.6 6.3 5.7

5 to 9 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.8

10 to 14 4.8 5.6 5.4 5.9

15 to 19 5.9 6.2 5.9 5.9

20 to 24 10.4 9.9 6.7 6.1

25 to 29 9.7 8.4 6.9 5.8

30 to 34 8.8 8.3 6.8 6.2

35 to 39 7.0 7.6 6.2 6.5

40 to 44 6.3 6.5 6.8 6.4

45 to 49 6.1 5.7 7.2 6.1

50 to 54 5.6 5.0 6.8 5.6

55 to 59 4.8 4.7 5.9 5.8

60 to 64 4.3 4.5 5.4 6.1

65 to 69 4.0 4.1 5.5 5.8

70 to 74 3.0 3.3 4.0 4.8

75 to 79 2.4 2.7 3.3 4.0

80 to 84 1.9 2.4 2.4 3.6

85 to 89 1.2 1.4 1.5 2.2

90+ 0.8 1.1 0.9 1.6

Bristol England

% total population

Age group

2014 2030 2014 2030

0 to 4 5.9 5.3 6.3 5.7

5 to 9 5.7 5.7 6.0 5.8

10 to 14 5.4 5.8 5.4 5.9

15 to 19 5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9

20 to 24 4.6 4.1 6.7 6.1

25 to 29 5.0 4.3 6.9 5.8

30 to 34 5.5 5.0 6.8 6.2

35 to 39 5.6 5.8 6.2 6.5

40 to 44 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.4

45 to 49 7.5 6.0 7.2 6.1

50 to 54 7.2 5.7 6.8 5.6

55 to 59 6.3 6.1 5.9 5.8

60 to 64 6.3 6.8 5.4 6.1

65 to 69 7.1 6.7 5.5 5.8

70 to 74 5.2 5.7 4.0 4.8

75 to 79 4.1 5.0 3.3 4.0

80 to 84 3.1 5.0 2.4 3.6

85 to 89 2.0 3.2 1.5 2.2

90+ 1.3 2.4 0.9 1.6

% total population

North Somerset England

Age group

50

D. South Gloucestershire

2014 2030 2014 2030

0 to 4 5.5 4.9 6.3 5.7

5 to 9 5.5 5.4 6.0 5.8

10 to 14 5.4 5.8 5.4 5.9

15 to 19 5.9 5.7 5.9 5.9

20 to 24 5.0 4.3 6.7 6.1

25 to 29 5.4 4.4 6.9 5.8

30 to 34 5.1 4.8 6.8 6.2

35 to 39 5.0 5.3 6.2 6.5

40 to 44 6.3 5.6 6.8 6.4

45 to 49 7.3 5.4 7.2 6.1

50 to 54 7.3 5.3 6.8 5.6

55 to 59 6.6 6.1 5.9 5.8

60 to 64 6.7 7.2 5.4 6.1

65 to 69 7.1 7.3 5.5 5.8

70 to 74 5.3 6.2 4.0 4.8

75 to 79 4.2 5.5 3.3 4.0

80 to 84 3.2 5.2 2.4 3.6

85 to 89 2.1 3.2 1.5 2.2

90+ 1.3 2.4 0.9 1.6

Age group

% total population

Somerset England

2014 2030 2014 2030

0 to 4 6.0 5.5 6.3 5.7

5 to 9 6.0 5.8 6.0 5.8

10 to 14 5.4 5.9 5.4 5.9

15 to 19 6.5 6.0 5.9 5.9

20 to 24 6.1 6.0 6.7 6.1

25 to 29 6.0 5.3 6.9 5.8

30 to 34 6.2 5.9 6.8 6.2

35 to 39 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.5

40 to 44 7.0 6.3 6.8 6.4

45 to 49 7.9 6.2 7.2 6.1

50 to 54 7.4 5.8 6.8 5.6

55 to 59 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.8

60 to 64 5.4 6.4 5.4 6.1

65 to 69 5.6 6.0 5.5 5.8

70 to 74 4.4 4.8 4.0 4.8

75 to 79 3.4 4.0 3.3 4.0

80 to 84 2.5 3.7 2.4 3.6

85 to 89 1.4 2.4 1.5 2.2

90+ 0.8 1.7 0.9 1.6

Age group

% total population

S. Gloucestershire England

51

Table 2: Percentage population split by ethnicity. Data from ONS.

CCG White Mixed Asian/Asian British

Black/Black British

Other ethnic group

Bristol 84.0 3.6 5.5 6.0 0.9

North Somerset 97.3 1.0 1.2 0.3 0.2

Somerset 98.0 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.1

South Gloucestershire 95.0 1.4 2.5 0.8 0.3

Table 3: Percentage of adults, aged 18 and over, who smoke, 2012

CCG Smoking prevalence

Bristol 21.3%

North Somerset 14.8%

Somerset 17.5%

South Gloucestershire 17.5%

Data source: Health Profiles, Public Health England

Table 4: Percentage of adults classified as obese

CCG Obesity

Bristol 23.8%

North Somerset 22.7%

Somerset 23.4%

South Gloucestershire 21.1%

Data source: Health Profiles, Public Health England

Table 5: Percentage of people in this area living in 20% most deprived areas in

England

CCG Deprivation

Bristol 25.9%

North Somerset 9.6%

Somerset 3.7%

South Gloucestershire 0.5%

Data source: Health Profiles, Public Health England

52

Table 6: People registered blind with an additional disability, year ending March 2014

Number registered as blind or partially

sighted

Proportion of all registrations with/who are:

Total with an additional disability

an additional disability

mental health

problems

learning disability

physical disability

deaf hard of hearing

Bristol 2595 565 21.8% 2.7% 1.5% 11.2% 5.0% 1.3%

North Somerset

1145 40 3.5% 0.9% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

Somerset 3085 460 14.9% 0.5% 2.4% 5.0% 0.2% 6.8%

South Gloucestershire

740 475 64.2% 3.4% 4.1% 50.7% 0.0% 6.1%

Data source: Source: Health & Social Care Information Centre www.hscic.gov.uk

*All data are rounded to the nearest 5

INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF PARTIAL SIGHT AND

BLINDNESS

Table 7: Number of people registered as blind or partially sighted (March 2014)

A. Bristol

Year All Cases

Total Blind Partial Sight

2008 1,955 930 1,025

2011 2,485 1,270 1,215

2014 2,595 1,300 1,295

B. North Somerset

Year All Cases

Total Blind Partial Sight

2008 1,305 670 635

2011 1,360 695 665

2014 1,145 570 575

C. Somerset

Year All Cases

Total Blind Partial Sight

53

2008 2,835 1,560 1,275

2011 3,240 1,410 1,830

2014 3,085 1,370 1,715

D. South Gloucestershire

Year All Cases

Total Blind Partial Sight

2008 890 505 385

2011 800 435 365

2014 740 400 340

Data source: Source: Health & Social Care Information Centre www.hscic.gov.uk

*All data are rounded to the nearest 5

54

Table 8: Certification of Vision Impairment (CVI)

CVIs issued, 2011/12 % change in rate per 100,000,

2010/11-2011/12 Rate per 100,000

population

% severely sight impaired

Bristol 29.4 48.4% 36.8%

North Somerset 42.4 43.0% 22.8%

Somerset 57.2 33.9% -9.2%

South Gloucestershire 25.8 57.4% 22.7%

Data source: RNIB data tool

Table 9: Estimated number of people living with sight loss

Estimated number of people living with sight loss

Estimated number living with sight

loss in 2030 Total Severe sight loss

only

Bristol 10,880 1,310 13,720

North Somerset 7,600 940 13,610

Somerset 19,860 2,460 33,000

South Gloucestershire 7,740 920 12,550

Data source: RNIB data tool

55

Table 10: Current and future estimates of the number of people living with visual

impairment, by age group

A. Bristol

2014 2015 2020 2025 2030

People predicted to have a serious visual impairment

18-24 years 38 38 38 38 42

25-34 years 53 54 56 57 55

35-44 years 38 39 41 44 46

45-54 years 34 34 34 33 35

55-64 years 26 26 29 30 30

People predicted to have a moderate or serious visual impairment

65-74 years 1,719 1,753 1,859 1,882 2,089

75 + years 3,484 3,509 3,757 4,377 4,824

People predicted to have registrable eye conditions

75 + years 1,798 1,811 1,939 2,259 2,490

B. North Somerset

2014 2015 2020 2025 2030

People predicted to have a serious visual impairment

18-24 years 9 9 8 8 9

25-34 years 14 14 15 15 14

35-44 years 17 17 17 18 19

45-54 years 20 20 20 18 18

55-64 years 17 17 19 21 20

People predicted to have a moderate or serious visual impairment

65-74 years 1,439 1,473 1,529 1,501 1,680

75 + years 2,740 2,802 3,360 4,166 4,662

People predicted to have registrable eye conditions

75 + years 1,414 1,446 1,734 2,150 2,406

56

C. Somerset

2014 2015 2020 2025 2030

People predicted to have a serious visual impairment

18-24 years 25 25 23 22 25

25-34 years 37 37 39 38 36

35-44 years 40 39 38 41 42

45-54 years 51 52 48 42 41

55-64 years 47 47 51 54 51

People predicted to have a moderate or serious visual impairment

65-74 years 3,752 3,864 4,122 4,071 4,497

75 + years 7,167 7,341 8,581 10,627 11,991

People predicted to have registrable eye conditions

75 + years 3,699 3,789 4,429 5,485 6,189

D. South Gloucestershire

2014 2015 2020 2025 2030

People predicted to have a serious visual impairment

18-24 years 16 16 16 15 17

25-34 years 21 21 22 23 22

35-44 years 23 23 23 24 25

45-54 years 27 27 26 24 24

55-64 years 20 20 23 26 24

People predicted to have a moderate or serious visual impairment

65-74 years 1,506 1,540 1,579 1,602 1,859

75 + years 2,765 2,840 3,398 4,055 4,489

People predicted to have registrable eye conditions

75 + years 1,427 1,466 1,754 2,093 2,317

Data sources: Projecting Older People Population Information (POPPI) and Projecting

Adult Needs and Service Information (PANSI)