evaluation of sheet metal covers to improve tool life in ... of sheet metal...evaluation of sheet...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of Sheet Metal Covers to
Improve Tool Life in Forging
Prof. Dr.-Ing. L. Schaeffer*, J. Zottis, Dr. Ing. A. Brito,
Laboratório de Transformação Mecânica – UFRGS
Prof. Dr.-Ing. G. Hirt, M. Wolfgarten*, Y. Yu
Institut für Bildsame Formgebung – RWTH Aachen
University
*Presenting authors
Slide 2
Motivation
Tooling costs stand up to 15-35% of total costs
Main failure of forging die: abrasive wear
Most failures appear on the surface
Method of surface protection
– Surface treatment (Nitriding, PVD…)
– Coating
– Die insert
Tool repair and exchange is still required
To protect forging tool, decrease tooling costs
Inspired by the exchangeable cutting tool insert
For Making the surface of forging die
“exchangeable”
Wear
Mechanial
fatigue
Plastic
deformation
Thermal
fatigue
Failures
Out of use
Hot forging die Forging
Traditional forging
Slide 3
Motivation
Inexpensive and easy-to-exchange sheet metal
as a protective die cover
Die cover concept
– Failures will only affect die covers
– Can be exchanged quickly
– Thermal load will be reduced
– Economical
Fix the die cover Forging
Take out forging
pieces
Take out the die cover
after N forging pieces
Out of use
Recycle use
Forging die
Forging with die covers
Slide 4
Motivation
Slide 5
Conclusions from the previous project stage
Materials were selected based upon their mechanical and
thermal properties.
Different geometries were developed to define the
application range of this concept.
The protection effect of die covers was proved both by
simulations and experiment.
Two geometries were validated by experiment and the die
cover reached 10 forging cycles.
Open questions:
– Wrinkling and thinning problems
– Application on more complex geometries
Slide 6
Objectives of the 2nd phase
Investigation of possibilities to improve the boundary
conditions
– Influence of the friction coefficient on the tensile stresses
within the die cover
– Test of enhanced sheet fixation
Development of a suitable die geometry
– Investigation of 3D geometries
– Investigation of axisymmetric geometries
Investigation of multi-stage forging processes
– Analysis of multi-stage forging process with reduced
tangential movement in forging stages
– Investigation of the “finisher” step
Slide 7
General information
Publications
– Publications in Journals:
First experimental and numerical study on the use of sheet metal die covers for wear
protection in closed-die forging (Key Engineering Materials Vols 651-653 (2015) pp 266-271)
Estudo da aplicabilidade de máscaras metálicas de DP600 em superfícies de matrizes de
forjamento (Revista Ferramental. ed 66, p27-32. Curitiba, 2016)
– Conference Proceedings:
Influence of the Die Geometry on the Application of a Sheet Metal Cover for Wear Protection
in Closed Die Forging (35th SENAFOR)
Influence of Die Geometry and Material Selection on the Behavior of Protective Die Covers
in Closed-die Forging (ESAFORM 2016)
Characterization of DP600 Sheet Mechanical Properties and Anisotropy (15th ENEMET –
ABM)
Study of DP600 metallic mask applicability in forging die surface (36th SENAFOR)
Temperature influence on DP600 sheet hardness to metallic mask application in Hot Forging
(36th SENAFOR)
Hot Forging Process Analysis Using a Metallic Mask as Surface Coating (22th Cbecimat)
Slide 8
General information
Work missions
– Brazil: Prof. Dr.-Ing. L. Schaeffer
– Germany: M. Wolfgarten, Y. Yu
Student missions
– Brazil: Master Student A-K. Haussmann
– Germany: Doctoral Student J. Zottis; Master Student T. M. Ivaniski
Post-Doctor
– Prof. Dr. Eng. A. Brito (Brazil Germany)
Students
– Bachelor students: A. Seeliger and N. Adrian (Germany); A. Rosiak, G. Graziottin and
H. Kemmerich (Brazil)
– Master students: E. Segebade, S. Böhnke (Germany), T. M. Ivaniski (Brazil)
– Doctoral students: Y. Yu (Germany); L. de L. de Costa (Brazil), J. Zottis (Brazil Germany)
Slide 9
Investigation of 3D geometries
Comparison of 2D die cover and 3D die cover
2D die cover
– Easy to form
– Wrinkling and thinning problems
– Material of billet flows around the die cover
3D die covers
– Need more complex manufacture process
– More stable2D die cover 3D die cover
Billet
Die cover
Forging die
Problem of 2D die cover
Material flows around the die cover 2D die cover 3D die cover
Slide 10
Two ideas to explore 3D die covers
From existed sheet metal parts to forging parts
– Advantages: die cover manufacture process already existed
From the geometry to the manufacture of die cover
Investigation of 3D geometries
Square flange
Cross forging
Slide 11
Investigation of 3D geometries
Two ideas to explore 3D die covers
From existed sheet metal parts to forging parts
– Cross die
Material flow mainly perpendicular to forging direction
1 2
3 4
Forming progress Material flow
Cross sheet part
Cross forging part
Slide 12
Investigation of 3D geometries
Experimental validation
– Material: 22MnB5
– Die covers manufactured by deep drawing
Drawing depth: 30 mm
– Heat treatment
Heating above 830°C, then cooling
-0.34
0.26
mm
0
Comparison of the die cover before and after heat treatment
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 200 400 600T
em
pera
ture
in
°C
Time in s
900°C
Heat treatment curve
Deep drawing
Slide 13
Investigation of 3D geometries
Experimental validation
– Billet: C45
– Dimension: 50*50*75 mm
– Lubricant: graphite
– 10 forging cycles
Lubrication Positioning billet Forging Taking off billet
2 s5s10 s 34 s
Waiting
30 s30s
Forging process
Slide 14
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 0,5 1 1,5 2
Fo
rce
in
KN
Time in s
experiment
simulation
Investigation of 3D geometries
Two ideas to explore 3D die covers
From the existed sheet metal part to the forging part
– Cross die
Maximum stress: 1372 MPa
0
700
1400
Von Mises stress
Unit: MPa
Maximum point
1372 MPa
Stress distribution Press force
Slide 17
Investigation of 3D geometries
Experimental validation
– 10 forging cycles
– Stable state: 350°C to 450°C
Conclusions
– The 3D die covers are more stable than the 2D die covers
– The die cover made by 22MnB5 has more than 10 cycles
service life
– Easy to put in and take off is possible in this case
– More cases with similar material flow ways can be explored
as the applications
Die covers before and
after heat treatment
Die covers before and
after 10 forging cycles
Slide 18
Idea two: from the geometry to the manufacture of die
cover
Idea of how to design the new geometry
– Keeping the cross section same with 2D geometries
– Considering the limitation of manufacture methods (deep
drawing and incremental forming)
– Nonaxisymmetrical
2D geometries in phase 1 3D geometries design The selected 3D geometry
Supporting tool for incremental forming
Investigation of 3D geometries
Slide 19
Investigation of 3D geometries
New 3D geometry
– Press force: 270 t
– Maximum stress: 1292 MPa
– Die cover manufacture: incremental forming
– Material: 22MnB5
0
700
1400
Von Mises stress
Unit: Mpa
Stress distribution Incremental forming of die cover
Slide 20
X: 15.6727
Y: 4.96127e+06
Investigation of axisymmetric geometries
– Numerical investigation to determine suitable geometries
– Investigation of manufacturing strategies for the die cover
– Evaluation of die wear by forging experiments
3D axisymmetric geometries
– Forging force analysis
– Billet size
– Experimental plan
Investigation of 3D geometries
Gear Blanks
Ø150x50 mm
Numerical evaluation – billet size
Axisymmetric geometry
Slide 21
3D axisymmetric geometries
– Numerical simulation results
Using a sheet metal as a die cover – 22MnB5
Without die cover
– Maximum temperature of the lower die on surface decrease
from 640°C to 320°C
– von Mises stresses decrease from 700 MPa to 380 MPa.
Investigation of 3D geometries
Die cover (22MnB5 with 1.5 mm thickness) after one forging cycle
Temperature (°C)
Temperature (°C)
Without Die Cover
Without Die Cover
With Die Cover
With Die Cover
Stress – Effective (MPa)
Stress - Effective (MPa)
Slide 22
Investigation of manufacturing strategies for the die cover
– Incremental Sheet Forming
Different materials
DP600
22MnB5 (before treatment)
DC04
Manufacturing of a supporting tool (forging tool)
Process parameters:
Offset = 0.5 mm (Z)
Velocity = 4000 m/s
Tool size
1st 20 mm
2nd 10 mm
Die cover measurements:
3D scan
Optical 3D (ARGUS 5M)
Investigation of 3D geometries
First Path – tool 20 mm
Second Path – tool 20 mm
ab
c d
Holder
Sheet
material
Supporting
tool
Final Geometry – tool 10 mm
Slide 23
Incremental Sheet Forming
– Equipment: Amino
– Fixation
Bottom of Supporting tool
Structure for lateral stability
Investigation of 3D geometries
FixationMaterial thickness samples
DC04 1mm 3
1.5mm 3
DP600 1mm 3
22MnB5-coated (before quenching) 1mm 6
1.5mm 3
Samples number of manufactured covers
with different thickness.
Slide 24
Incremental Sheet Forming
– Equipment: Amino
– Manufacturing steps:
First path with 20 mm of tool diameter
Second path with 10 mm of tool diameter
Investigation of 3D geometries
ISF Process Final Step
Manufactured Die Cover
Slide 25
3D die covers measurements
– A PDA grid pattern or mesh printed by Laser on the bottom
surface of sheet metal before incremental forming process
(ISF).
– Optical 3D measurement system (ARGUS 5M) was used to
evaluate the final thickness of the manufacture die cover.
– For the DP600 formed material, can be observed higher
reduction in the die cover walls.
– ISF process could provide an accurate final geometry.
Investigation of 3D geometries
Slide 26
3D axisymmetric geometries
– Experimental plan
Investigation of 3D geometries
1. Forging Experiment Set and lubrication
2. HeatingBillet – 45 min
Dies – 20 min
3. Billet Transfer ~ 30 s
4. Positioning and Start ~ 10 s
5. Forging Operation 15 mm (stroke Z)
6. Extraction and lubrication ~ 60 s
Cover Materials
DC04
22MnB5
DP600
Forging cycle for each cover sample N = 4
Slide 27
Test of enhanced sheet fixation
Test of enhanced sheet fixation
– High temperature glue (long curing time)
– Mechanical fixing
Mechanical fixations
Fixation effect in simulation Holder used as a
mechanical fixation
Holder
Die cover
Lower die
Fixation
Fixation
Slide 28
Outlook
Investigation of possibilities to improve the boundary
conditions
– To validate the friction results in experiment using different
topography
Development of a suitable die geometry
– To explore the max service life of die cover in different
geometries
– Evaluation of die wear
Investigation of multi-stage forging processes
– Analysis of multi-stage forging process with reduced
tangential movement in forging stages
– Investigation of the “finisher” step
Different topography
Slide 29
Thank you for your attention!