evaluation of islamic microfinance in sudan during 2000 - 2010

Download Evaluation of Islamic microfinance in Sudan during 2000 - 2010

Post on 01-Feb-2017

220 views

Category:

Documents

6 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2011 18-20

    2010-2000

    ( )

    :

    00249912367949 :

    2Tabuamona@sudanmail.net.sd

    2Tabuamona65@yahoo.com2T 1432 2011

    mailto:abuamona@sudanmail.net.sdmailto:abuamona65@yahoo.com

  • :

    ( ) 2010-2000

    .

    :

    . .

    .

    .

    % 69 .

    .

  • Abstract

    This research is entitled Evaluating Islamic MF in Sudan during the period "2000-2010 case study Banking sectors & Social Institutions.

    There was a great concern about poverty rank since then, strategies have been set to increase income through the macroeconomic policies, and social financial policies.

    The research tries to answer the questions: Did the government follow strategies to alleviate poverty in

    Sudan? Did the governmental institutions supervise and participate to

    arrive the target group? What is the role of central Bank of Sudan in adopting new

    policies in MF? To what extend Banks have implement MF polices. The research adopted historical method case study, analytical

    method. The research found that: The government has supported & supervise the target group,

    despite the absence of standard measurement in Sudan. The MF percentage is low, however, saving & social

    development Bank and family Bank are providing high percent finance from the total of MF.

    Zakat chamber has spend a percentage of 69% to poor people in a form of cash and financing service, group projects.

    The research recommends to: Develop MF services by activating social funds and establishing

    ministry fro small projects and reducing MF revenue. Promote mobile banking and raise awareness of bank employees

    and customers to the culture of MF.

  • .

    2007% 12% 10% 7% 5 .

    .

    . ( 2010-2000 :

    )

    . :

    .

    : :. -1 -2. - 3 .- 4

    . : -2000 : :

    . 2010

  • .

    (

    ) .

    . ) 10 1996 (

    .

    .

    . :

    .

    . )8 2002 (

    - 1:

    . - : 2

    ). 15-10 25 ( : - 3

    ) ( 25 ( . ).

    : :

    . 49 10 99 :-1

    . - 2

    .) 14 2002 ( 10

  • 1972: : 1976

    . .

    . :

    .

    .

    .

    1993. .

    ( ).

    .

    : :

    .

    ( ) .

    .

    . )28 2003 ( ) 2006-1991 ( :

    1996.

    .

  • . .

    . . :

    : -1

    .)11 2002( : -2

    25 .

    : -3 .

    : -4

    . .

    : -5 .

    ).12 2001(

  • ) 2010-2007 : (

    % 12% 10% 7% 5 . 2010 2007

    .

    :-

    -1

    . ) 1957 ( - 2

    ) 1975 ( .

    -3 ). 2008 (

    ( )- 4()

    . ( - 5

    .)6 2011 ) ( : .

    . 2010 .

    . : .

    .

    .

  • .

    .

    .

    . 2010-2000 :

    ) 1 (

    2010-2005

    2010* 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 1 T0F1

    28 27.63 26.03 24.21 22.21 19.5

    6 6.1 7.8 10.2 10 8.3 %

    1T1F2 8.4 7.2 8.1 14.4 11.2 14.9 1T2F3 2.5 2.17 2.01 2.19 2.32 2.37 ( /)

    4750 3704 3262.6 3059.2 2179 2421.2 2009- 2005 :

    2010 * ) :- 1 (

    % 10.2% - 8.3 )1( 2007 2005

    . 2010

    . 1

    : 2 " 3

    http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AFhttp://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AF

  • 2010-2008 )2(

    . .

    )3( .2010-2008 2007-2005

    . 2007 )4(

    20102009. 2010

    . )5(

    . : : .

    )2 (

    2010-2005

    2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 9 8.61 8.44 8.03 8.2 7.6

    :- 1.8 1.99 4.29 4.47 3.4 2.9

    3.7 3.04 3.11 2.87 2.7 2.5 :- 4.5 3.78 2.98 2.47 2.8 2.6

    5 10.21 4.72 4.37 5.1 3.9 . 2010-2005 :

  • ) 3 (

    2010-2005

    2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 37.5 31.3 35.9 36.2 36.8 39.6

    7.5 7.2 18.2 20.1 15.1 15.1

    15.4 11.1 13.2 12.9 12.4 13.1 18.8 13.7 12.7 11.1 12.8 12.1

    20.7 36.9 20 19.7 22.9 20.1 ) 2: (

    ) :- 3) ( 2 ( )1(

    . 2010-2005 % 36.2

    %) 15.1 ( 2005 )2(. 2010 2008

    %. 13.9 % 10 )3(

    % 13 . 2010-2005 .

    )4( %. 13.5 .

    )5(

    %. 23.4 .

    .

    2010-2000 :

    % 27 % 38

  • % 35 1999

    2010 .

    :- :- 1

    .

    .

    - 2

    . : - 3

    .

    % 25 % 17

    % 8 .

    . : - 4

    .

    .

  • :- 5

    . :

    .

    . (

    ). 2010-2000 :

    . ( ) - : 1

    (

    ). 13500 - :2

    2001

    . : - 3

    ( )

    . ) 12-4 2006 (

    :

    .

  • 2000-2010

    .

    .

    .

    : : 20102010--20002000

    . ( )

    .

    .

    . 2010- 2000

    .

    .

    ( ) .

    -2000) 5) (4 ( ).13 2011 (2010

  • ) 4 (

    2006-2000

    2006-2000

    ) 5 (

    2010-2007

    2010-2007

    ) : 5) (4 () ( ) 1 ( . 2006- 2000% %10 - 7

    2007 .

    2007) 2 ( .2010% 12

    . (1) . (1)

    2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

    (

    3) F )2

    7 7 10 10 10 10 10

    93 93 90 90 90 90 90

    2010 2009 2008 2007

    (

    4) F )2

    12 12 12 12

    88 88 88 88

  • 2010-2000 : ) 6 (

    2010-2000

    . 2004-2000) 1* ( . 12 2006) ,2 (

    . 2010-2007) 3(

    ) :- 6 ( )1(

    % 12% 10% 7 .

    .2000 )2(% 12 )3(

    . %2

    )4(

    .

    2.1 7 7.2 72655 2000 (o.9) 7 6.1 88997 2001 (5.6) 10 4.4 91430 2002 (5.6) 10 4.4 122930 2003 (5.4) 10 4.6 196429 2004 (6.4) 10 3.6 247391 2005 (6.9) 10 3.1 148614 2006 (10.7) 12 1.3 232240 2007 (10.4) 12 1.6 243164 2008 (10.4) 12 1.6 334900 2009

    2010 449682 1.8 12 (10.2)

  • :

    ) 7 (

    2004-2000 :

    ) :- 7 () 1(

    % . 64.6% %76.9 - 36.6% 18% - 4.4) 2(

    10.5 . % 20012003% 1)

Recommended

View more >