evaluating online information eng 201 – ibarra – spring 2009

25
Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Upload: lora-matthews

Post on 29-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluating Online Information

ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Page 2: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Today you will learn how to…

1. Apply evaluative criteria to web sites in order to analyze the validity of the information contained within them.

2. Determine the probable accuracy of information on the web by questioning the source of the data.

Page 3: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Web Page Evaluation Criteria

1. AUTHOR

2. CURRENCY

3. ACCURACY

4. PURPOSE

Page 4: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

EVALUATION CRITERIA #1

Authorship

Page 5: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #1: Authorship

Know where to look for an author identification.

Evaluate the credentials of an author.

Distinguish sources of information by domain.

Page 6: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #1: Authorship

How to Identify an Author:TIP! Right-click or ctrl +click to open these links in a new window or tab.

“Bad Subjects: Have We Put it All Behind Us?”http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/71/churchill.html

“Black Panther Political Art”http://cghs.dade.k12.fl.us/african-american/twentieth_century/panthers.htm

“Black Panther Party”http://www.stanford.edu/~ccarson/articles/am_left.htm

Page 7: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #1: Authorshiphttp://www.stanford.edu/~ccarson/articles/

am_left.htm

http:// is the protocol or access method

www.stanford.edu is the domain or host name

.edu is the top level domain

~ccarson/articles/am_left.htm is the directory path folder on the domain computer

Page 8: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #1: Authorship

.com – commercial (for profit) entities

.org – nonprofit entities

.edu – educational institutions

.gov – federal government agencies

.mil – US military

.int – international organizations

State or Country of origin .de - Germany .ca.us – California, US .ca - Canada

Page 9: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #1: Authorship

What to look for:

Who is responsible for the site?

Do the authors have authority on the topic?

Is it a commercial, governmental, personal, or academic web site?

Page 10: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

EVALUATION CRITERIA #2

Currency

Page 11: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #2: Currency

Where to look for a source’s publication date:

TIP! Right-click or ctrl +click to open these links in a new window or tab.

“Bad Subjects: Have We Put it All Behind Us?”http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/71/churchill.html

“Black Panther Party Political Art”http://cghs.dade.k12.fl.us/african-american/twentieth_century/panthers.htm

“HIV and the Challenges Facing Men”http://www.undp.org/hiv/publications/issues/english/issue15e.htm

Page 12: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

EVALUATION CRITERIA #3Accuracy

Page 13: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #3: Accuracy

What to look for:

Where did the authors find their information?http://www.ppu.org.uk/war/index.html (Peace Pledge Union)

Do the authors provide supportive evidence for their conclusions? Works cited or bibliography?http://www.undp.org/hiv/publications/issues/english/issue15e.htm (HIV & the Challenges Facing Men)

Page 14: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

EVALUATION CRITERIA #4

Purpose

Page 15: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #4: Purpose

Why was the web page created?

To sell?

http://www.lifehealthsolutions.com/library3/disorders/hiv.htm

(Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome HIV/AIDS)

To inform? http://www.undp.org/hiv/publications/issues/english/issue15e.htm (HIV & the Challenges Facing Men)

To deceive? http://www.martinlutherking.org/

(Martin Luther King Jr.)

Page 16: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Evaluation Criteria #4: Purpose

Always look at the domain and home page

Search for an “about us” page

To uncover hoaxes:

SNOPES: Urban Legends Reference Pageshttp://www.snopes.com

Page 17: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Email Hoax?

Hercules: The World’s Biggest Dog

Page 18: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Review Evaluation Criteria

Authorship Do the authors have training on the topic? .com, .gov, .edu, .org site?

Currency Is the site out of date for your topic?

Accuracy Works cited or bibliography?

Purpose Why was the web site created? Is there an “about us” or “credits”

section?

Page 19: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Your Task: Find and Evaluate a Web Site on the Topic of Plagiarism Divide into groups of 3-5 Find a web page that discusses the topic of

plagiarism. Evaluate the web page based on the four

evaluative criteria we just discussed in class. Answer the question: Is this a good site to use

for college-level research? Why or why not? Answer the question: How effectively does

this page use inductive reasoning? Write one page summary of your findings and

create a presentation to share with the class.

Page 20: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

A Couple of Search Tips…

Search for web pages within specific domains:

Use the search command site:.edu or site:.gov to limit

your search to educational or government web sites.

Search for specific document file types:

Use the command filetype:pdf or filetype:doc to limit

your search to Adobe PDF or Word files.

Page 21: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Domain Search

Example: “capital punishment” site:.edu

Page 22: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Filetype Search

Example: “capital punishment” filetype:pdf

Page 23: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Use advanced search instead of search commands for the same result

Page 24: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

Combine the two commandsExample:“capital punishment” site:.edu filetype:pdf

Page 25: Evaluating Online Information ENG 201 – Ibarra – Spring 2009

http://library.riohondo.edu/

QUESTIONS? 562-908-3484

Shawna Hellenius – [email protected]

Visit Rio Hondo Libraryfor all your research needs!