ethics complaint against councilor david madore · ethics complaint against councilor david madore...

117
Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore Chuck Green 2705 NE 170 th Street Ridgefield, WA 98642 360-449-2132 [email protected] To: Clark County Council Chair Marc Boldt CC: Councilors Stewart, Olson, Mielke and Madore Clark County Manager Mark McCauley Subject: Citizen Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore Date: July 18, 2016 The citizens of Clark County, after experiencing years of frustration at the lack of transparency, incessant attacks on county staff, continued decisions that cost county taxpayers millions of dollars that will never be recovered, willful contempt for the media, ostracism for simply disagreeing with him, and continued favoritism toward one special interest group, hereby file the following complaint of violations of the County Councilor Code of Ethical Conduct against County Councilor David Madore. While this complaint is being submitted under the County’s Rules of Practice and Code of Ethical Conduct as amended May 17, 2016, it is noted that the various codes in the Code of Ethics are the same as attached to the 2014 and 2015 Rules of Practice. We are requesting the Board convene an Ethics Committee to investigate these charges against Councilor Madore about violations of the Council's Ethics Code and report to the citizens of Clark County their findings. If the Ethics Committee finds violations, we request appropriate On behalf of 526 Clark County citizen voters, I am submitting this Complaint against Councilor David Madore for violations of the County Council’s Code of Ethical Conduct.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Mar-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore

Chuck Green

2705 NE 170th Street

Ridgefield, WA 98642

360-449-2132

[email protected]

To: Clark County Council Chair Marc Boldt

CC: Councilors Stewart, Olson, Mielke and Madore

Clark County Manager Mark McCauley

Subject: Citizen Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore

Date: July 18, 2016

The citizens of Clark County, after experiencing years of frustration at the lack of transparency,

incessant attacks on county staff, continued decisions that cost county taxpayers millions of

dollars that will never be recovered, willful contempt for the media, ostracism for simply

disagreeing with him, and continued favoritism toward one special interest group, hereby file

the following complaint of violations of the County Councilor Code of Ethical Conduct against

County Councilor David Madore. While this complaint is being submitted under the County’s

Rules of Practice and Code of Ethical Conduct as amended May 17, 2016, it is noted that the

various codes in the Code of Ethics are the same as attached to the 2014 and 2015 Rules of

Practice.

We are requesting the Board convene an Ethics Committee to investigate these charges against

Councilor Madore about violations of the Council's Ethics Code and report to the citizens of

Clark County their findings. If the Ethics Committee finds violations, we request appropriate

On behalf of 526 Clark County citizen voters, I am submitting this

Complaint against Councilor David Madore for violations of the

County Council’s Code of Ethical Conduct.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

2 | P a g e

action be taken including removing Councilor Madore from appointments to Boards and

Commissions on which he serves. One such Board for consideration would be the Board of

Health; Councilor Madore has on a number of occasions created conspiracy theories related to

a number of Public Health functions, grants and programs that make the citizens question his

ability to serve on such a Board.

The following summarizes the ethics charges and relevant ethics principal which we believe

have been violated by Councilor Madore. Exhibits are attached which comprise the bank of

evidence, organized by charge. Also attached are the names of the 526 Clark County citizen

voters who signed a petition endorsing this ethics complaint.

In addition to the evidence included, this ethics complaint makes reference to two independent

reports which have investigated Councilor Madore’s actions and accusations:

Rebecca Dean’s independent investigation, summary report:

http://16749-presscdn-0-94.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/R-Dean-

Report.pdf

Chuck Green citizen investigative report:

https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/Green_Investigation_Madore_final.pdf?token=AWwQvaAojP4

4DEzBgJOqZXeG9uSFaM1BP7Z69BpVg_Jk4TyYDwZESElmPcKsSaewvS9UUwbS2skR9tyncJchmb-

tBYGj-bO7NaWQqO4D4BRN5VbEJlKAPmkwJLZAty2DJVks-yRnI_EerUsS0-6ta83L

-or-

Facebook: Clark County Citizens for Good Governance, Files,

Green_Investigation_Madore_final.pdf

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

3 | P a g e

Actions include unilaterally developing Alternative 4 with input from a single

special interest group, secretly developing documents and releasing them

without giving the public an opportunity to review and comment, giving

direction to staff with policies that did not exist.

Relevant Ethics Principle #1: A county councilor should be vigorously dedicated to the

democratic ideals of honesty, openness and accountability in all public matters involving county

government.

Evidence: Exhibit 1

Councilor Madore himself developed and continuously modified Comprehensive Plan Land Use

Alternative #4, not only micromanaging the process but also producing ambiguous, changing

and difficult-to-replicate information. Madore, with no expertise in comprehensive planning,

purposely developed planning assumptions to support that alternative which have been ruled

Invalid by his own hand-picked expert consultant.

On at least one occasion (October 20, 2015), Councilor Madore did not release important

documents relevant to Alternative 4 or its planning assumptions until minutes before public

hearings and meetings on the matter, giving the public no time to review and adequately

comment. On at least one occasion (the same October 20, 2015 hearing), this caused a public

hearing to be continued, inconveniencing many citizens who had taken the time to attend and

speak at the hearing.

On two occasions, Councilor Madore directed county Planning staff to use higher Rural

population growth rate assumptions that he claimed were based on the adopted 1994 Plan

which were not true. This also is borderline misfeasance as defined by RCW 29A.56.110, recall

of public elected officials.

Charge #1: Councilor Madore continues to violate Ethics Principle

#1 by actions that are dishonest and lack transparency, and he

continues to avoid accountability for his actions.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

4 | P a g e

Relevant Ethics Code #2: Councilors should promote decorum, respect for others and civility in

all relationships.

Evidence: Exhibit 2

Starting in January 2016 and continuing throughout the Comprehensive Plan update process,

Councilor Madore falsely accused county Community Planning Director Oliver Orjiako of

misleading the comprehensive planning process, hiding a secret rural vacant and building lands

(RVBLM) model, and wrongfully inflating rural population forecasts. Madore further falsely

accused county deputy Prosecuting Attorneys Chris Horne and Chris Cook of wrongdoing

because of their denying Madore’s accusations against Dr. Orjiako.

These accusations were proven false not only by independent special investigator Rebecca

Dean, but a separate citizen investigation by Chuck Green. Portions of each investigation’s

report are attached in Exhibit 2 as evidence.

The RVBLM that Madore claims exists is actually a Geographic Information System (GIS) query

spreadsheet which was developed and modified under direct supervision and direction by

Councilor Madore in mid-2015. It was developed by the GIS division within the Assessor’s

office, and not the Community Planning department headed by Orjiako. Prior to 2015, the rural

population projection process was a simplified, GIS-based set of queries based on assumptions

that were documented throughout the comprehensive planning processes over the years.

It should be noted that at least nine (9) versions of Councilor Madore’s “Planning Assumptions”

that served as a basis for Councilor Madore’s Rural VBLM spreadsheet were developed and

circulated between October and mid-December 2015, making it almost impossible to track,

review or replicate his numbers.

Councilor Madore has openly defamed and held with contempt three of his fellow Councilors,

all of whom were fairly and properly elected and represent Clark County citizens. He has called

Charge #2: Councilor Madore has defamed and disrespected county

staff and his fellow councilors several times during his term in office,

especially during 2016. He is not promoting decorum or civility, and

shows an amazing lack of respect for those who disagree with his

opinion or don’t do his bidding.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

5 | P a g e

them the “liberal trio” and has even accused them of breaking the law without any evidence.

His comments incite those who follow him to show up and comment at council meetings, often

threatening or causing discomfort to regular citizens who honestly take the time to attend,

watch or even participate in county council meetings.

Councilor Madore wrongly accused Councilor Jeanne Stewart of casting a vote at a meeting she

did not even attend. While he has apologized, the accusatory post remained on his public

Facebook page for several weeks.

Councilor Madore continues to publicly express his contempt and disdain for the Growing

Healthier Report and the County’s Aging Readiness Report, both of which were adopted by

Clark County Commissioners, at the encouragement of Carol Levanen and Susan Rasmussen of

Clark County Citizens United, accusing them of “advancing Agenda 21”. Both of these reports

were developed with substantial community input and with input from experts in the health,

food quality, and aging community. As you can see in Exhibit 2, there is a long chain of emails

from Levanen and Rasmussen both making unfounded requests of Madore to remove these

adopted reports, and sponsored Food Systems Council, from the county’s website. Madore

complies with their request without an assessment or an investigation, directing Dr. Melnick to

comply with the CCCU request.

Councilor Madore has attacked a number of grants, programs and functions of the Public

Health Department with conspiracy theories which call into question his ability to serve on the

Board of Health.

There is an instance with the Shoreline Management Plan where the Dean report indicates

Madore and Don Benton staged an incident at a 2015 public hearing to publicly discredit staff.

That portion of the Dean report is also in Exhibit 2.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

6 | P a g e

Relevant Ethics Code #2: Councilors should promote decorum, respect for others and civility in

all relationships.

Evidence: Exhibit 3

Councilor Madore invites comment on county-related business items via his public Facebook

page, but has banned hundreds of citizens from that same public Facebook page. He continues

to ignore and not respond to emails, requests for comments, and phone messages from the

media and Clark County citizens, while continually showing favoritism toward two special

interest groups, Clark County Citizens United and Chuck Miller's "Washington Citizens for

Responsible Government".1

Councilor Madore has several times called members of the group Clark County Citizens for

Good Governance (and other groups) who disagree with or oppose him on a variety of positions

and opinions that Madore make, a “hate group” simply because they continue to monitor,

disagree with and challenge Councilor Madore’s decisions and actions. Councilor Madore

continues to hold the county’s Newspaper of Record, The Columbian, with contempt, calling

them a “cancer on society”.

Councilor Madore has continued to take actions to incite people against those with whom he

disagrees, including county staff, resulting in a hostile environment not only for county

employees, but also citizens. A group of citizens attending the Hockinson Alternative 4 open

house were openly called “communist” by an attendee of that forum shortly after Councilor 1 http://blogs.columbian.com/all-politics-is-local/the-chorus-of-the-banned/

http://blogs.columbian.com/all-politics-is-local/prolific-facebook-banning-in-question/

Charge #3: Councilor Madore has disparaged and defamed citizens

of Clark County several times during his term in office, especially

during 2016, calling them members of a hate group and banning

them from his primary means of communication, his public

Facebook page.

He is not promoting decorum or civility, and shows an amazing lack

of respect for those who disagree with his opinion or don’t do his

bidding.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

7 | P a g e

Madore spoke against the process and county staff and those who disagreed with his

Alternative 4.

Councilor Madore posted a racist “Play the Race Card” meme on his public Facebook page and,

despite many community requests to remove it, the meme remains on his Facebook page.

Below is an example of where Councilor Madore uses his public Facebook page to ask for public

comment:

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

8 | P a g e

Relevant Ethics Code #2: Councilors should promote decorum, respect for others and civility in

all relationships.

Evidence: Exhibit 4

Councilor Madore has launched accusations or has nitpicked contracts and policy relationships

with: Humane Society of Southwest Washington; Columbia River Economic Development

Council; Regional Transportation Council; C-TRAN; Cities of Vancouver, Camas, Ridgefield,

Washougal, La Center and Battle Ground; and most entities on the Oregon side of the river who

are part of the Portland/Vancouver metropolitan area.

With the Humane Society contract in 2013, Madore nitpicked the process to the point where

the Humane Society had no choice but to threaten to no longer serve the county’s Animal

Control needs when it came to housing strays and spaying and neutering. Madore claimed the

county could take on the Humane Society’s work for less money; however, a study showed that

it would cost the county over $1 million per year to operate it own animal control (stray)

shelter, compared to the $200,000 to $300,000 per year paid to the Humane Society for them

to do the same thing.2 The newest contract places the projected annual cost at a little over

$410,000 per year for three years, still much less than the $1 million Madore wanted to cost

the county by providing its own shelter.

Councilor Madore intervened in and interfered with the RTC’s 10-Year Transportation Project

Priorities list, attempting to move his personal priority project, the I-5 at 179th Street

interchange, ahead of all other regional projects in priority for no reason other than he wanted

to. In 2014 the Clark County Transportation Alliance (CCTA) put together a list of Clark County’s

legislative transportation priorities. That evolved into an updated RTC 10-Year Transportation

Priorities list. Three projects were added to the 2014 10-Year list in this effort: 2 http://www.columbian.com/news/2013/jul/28/animal-shelter-would-cost-clark-county-1m-a-year/

Charge #4: Councilor Madore has worked to sever relationships with

most of Clark County’s partner or stakeholder entities, often using

conspiracy theories to do so. This has caused irreparable harm to

the reputation of Clark County government and led to reluctance in

the willingness of former partner agencies to conduct business with

Clark County.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

9 | P a g e

Mill Plain Corridor from Port of Vancouver to I-5

I-5 at Mill Plain interchange improvement

I-5 at 179th Street interchange improvement.

In 2014, in fact, the CCTA lobbied to add the I-5 at 179th Street interchange to this priority list

through RTC, as it had not appeared on the list bedore. When RTC adopted the transportation

priorities list in early 2014, David Madore stated: "the 179th Street project listed on the Alliance

statement is a high priority for Clark County" for their economic development. He "would like

to see at least that project … added to the list."3 In March 2014, when RTC was considering the

CCTA priorities list as part of their 10-Year Transportation Priorities list, Commissioner Madore

said “at this point he was not arguing what order to place it, just to put it on the list.”4

With the 2015 process, the county, led by Councilor Madore, tried to change the rules to force

the I-5 at 179th Street interchange higher on the RTC list: "DAVID MADORE MOTIONED TO

MOVE THE NUMBER 10 RANKED PROJECT, I-5 AT 179TH STREET INTERCHANGE, TO THE

NUMBER 5 RANK POSITION ON THE LIST. TOM MIELKE SECONDED THE MOTION." 5

The motion failed and the list was adopted, with Councilor Madore voting “no”, essentially

voting against the county’s own projects.

Councilor Madore continues to launch conspiracy theories about “resurrection of the failed CRC

project” with anything related to priority projects for which the City of Vancouver, Port of

Vancouver and CREDC desire to implement, including the I-5 at Mill Plain interchange

reconstruction project and the Mill Plain corridor improvements from I-5 to the Port of

Vancouver. Councilor Madore has accused Identity Clark County, Clark County Transportation

Alliance, and Governor Jay Inslee of a secret CRC conspiracy because these entities have all

identified the I-5 corridor crossing the Columbia River as a regional transportation priority.

3 http://rtc.wa.gov/packets/board/2014/02/201402_04_201401Minutes.pdf

4 http://rtc.wa.gov/packets/board/2014/04/201404_04_201403Minutes.pdf

5 http://rtc.wa.gov/packets/board/2015/02/201502-04-201501Minutes.pdf

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

10 | P a g e

Relevant Ethics Code #3: Councilors should actively practice stewardship of the county’s human,

fiscal and material resources.

Evidence: Exhibit 5

Then-commissioner Madore along with then-Commissioner Tom Mielke pressed Clark County

Administrator Bill Barron to hire Don Benton as Director of Environmental Services, a position

for which he was totally unqualified, instead of seeking out a qualified person through proper

Human Resources channels. The resultant settlement of a lawsuit cost the county $250,000.

While he recently tried to blame a retired and departed County Administrator for this hire, he

was very obviously lobbying for Don Benton at the May 1, 2013 Board Time meeting and made

a Facebook post in October 2013 that further indicated his involvement with the decision to

hire Benton.

Councilor Madore continues to attempt to insert himself into the Human Resources hiring

process, including promoting Lisa Ross for county manager, a position in which she is fully

unqualified.

Councilor Madore continues to accuse the county manager of wrongdoing for his dissolution of

the Department of Environmental Services, even though the Home Rule Charter gives the

county manager that authority.

Councilor Madore hand-picked planning consultant RW Thorpe to critique Councilor Madore’s

own planning assumptions supporting his own hand-developed Alternative 4, costing Clark

County taxpayers $40,000. The consultant ruled much of Madore’s assumptions to be invalid,

and Madore then started publicly discounting and defaming the consultant’s work.

Councilor Madore’s baseless and false accusations against county staff have cost taxpayers

almost $200,000 in attorney costs for normal business operations6, a special investigation

6 http://www.columbian.com/news/2016/jul/07/madore-allegations-cost-clark-county-taxpayers-big-bucks/

Charge #5: Councilor Madore continues to push for actions and

decisions that have cost Clark County taxpayers millions of dollars

that will never be recovered, as well as driving the county toward

budget deficits.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

11 | P a g e

based on accusations that he made against county staff, and legal counsel for the

comprehensive planning process.

Madore continues to push, and in fact during his term in office expanded, the Job Creator Fee

Waiver program which has given away $15 million in permit and traffic impact fee waivers.

Councilor Madore has continued to publicize the fee waiver program as a reason that Clark

County’s economy alternately is “the best on the West Coast” and “the best in the State”.

These claims are unsubstantiated. Using Washington State Employment Security Department

monthly statistics: 7

Based on total job creation, Clark County as a whole (unincorporated plus incorporated)

saw 6,000 new jobs in the year-to-year growth between December 2014 and December

2015. That is 3rd, behind King (31,300) and Snohomish (8,000).

Based on percent of growth, Clark County grew by 4.1% in that same year-to-year cycle.

That is 4th, behind Ferry (4.8%), Kitsap (5.2%), and Lewis (5.4%).

A 2014 audit as well as county staff and expert citizen groups have all reviewed and audited the

program, which have determined that there is no evidence the Fee Waiver program has been

responsible for job growth (an improving economy is responsible) and, in fact, the Fee Waiver

has achieved growth rates no better than Clark County’s cities which do not have giveaway fee

waiver programs.

The Fee Waiver program has not been shown to meet any of its ambiguous goals and is

reducing fund balances to levels where the county cannot match grant funds or will have to

delay transportation improvement projects for lack of funding. The Fee Waiver program has

resulted in subsidies to the Development Review program from residential developers as well

as taxpayers.

7 https://fortress.wa.gov/esd/employmentdata/reports-publications/economic-reports/washington-employment-

estimates

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

12 | P a g e

Relevant Ethics Code #5: Councilors should perform the duties of public office with fairness and

impartiality so to enhance the public confidence in county government.

Evidence: Exhibit 6

As noted above in Charge #2 with evidence contained in Exhibit 2, Councilor Madore continues

to cater to two special interest groups, Clark County Citizens United (CCCU) and "Washington

Citizens for Responsible Government". Besides exchanges of hundreds of emails between

Madore and CCCU members, there is evidence that several emails from CCCU were sent to

Councilor Madore’s private US Digital email. He not only does CCCU’s bidding without

questioning their motives or accusations, he purposely ignores citizens and media

representatives who may not agree with his decisions, positions or actions.

An example of the favoritism toward CCCU was at the September 3 and 10 joint Planning

Commission and County Council hearings on the Comprehensive Plan. At the September 3

hearing, Councilor Madore stated “if you testify tonight, the idea is that you’ve been heard, so

leave an opportunity for someone else to testify on the 10th.”8

However, at the September 10, 2015, Councilor Madore allowed Carol Levanen and Susan

Rasmussen of CCCU to testify a second time. After Prosecuting Attorney Christine Cook raised

concerns, Councilor Madore questioned whether this was against the law, claiming “it is not a

hard and fast rule. I will not disallow (a second testimony) if citizens come down…This is not a

repeat, this is not an election” even though Levanen and Rasmussen testified both times on

behalf of CCCU.9 All other citizen groups adhered to the single-testimony rule.

There are also instances where Councilor Madore has held special one-on-one after-hours

meetings with CCCU representatives; Councilor Madore met with them the evening of

8 http://www.cvtv.org/vid_link/16471, at approximately the 00:02:00 mark.

9 http://www.cvtv.org/vid_link/16469, at approximately the 1:23:00 mark.

Charge #6: Councilor Madore continues to violate his Oath of Office

by catering to a special interest group and conducting business and

decision-making in a biased manner. Councilor Madore twice

encouraged people to use anonymous internet-surfing websites to

obtain the Columbian newspaper without paying for it.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

13 | P a g e

September 20, 2015. CCCU members were seen bringing dinner in and storing it in the county

councilors’ refrigerator. There were at least two instances where CCCU members were invited

to the councilors’ table at a Board Time meeting in early 2014 and again in 2015.

Councilor Madore continues to call the Columbian, the County’s Newspaper of Record, a

“cancer on society”. On at least two occasions, in December 2015 and May 2016, Councilor

Madore through his public Facebook page publicized and encouraged his constituents to use

anonymous web-surfing media to obtain the Columbian without paying for it, which are not

only deceitful and dishonest but destroys the public trust in Madore as a county councilor.

Councilor Madore has several times made it clear how he tends to vote on policy matters,

including Alternative 4, prior to the public being able to comment and prior to public hearings

in which the decisions are being made, showing that he is not conducting office in an impartial

manner.

Relevant Ethics Code #2: Councilors should promote decorum, respect for others and civility in

all relationships.

Relevant Ethics Code #5: Councilors should perform the duties of public office with fairness and

impartiality so to enhance the public confidence in county government.

Evidence: Exhibit 7

Councilor Madore has on a number of occasions called Judge David Gregerson “silly judge”

because he does not agree with the judge’s rulings, and continues to present non-factual

information as if he practiced law. His public Facebook posts incite inflammatory responses

from those who follow him, and Councilor Madore does nothing to dissuade them.

Charge #7: Councilor Madore has demeaned and defamed honored

members of city councils and the judiciary system, and continues to

make negative and baseless statements that reflect on the County

Council as a whole.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

14 | P a g e

Councilor Madore publicly accused Washougal Councilor Jennifer McDaniel of “suing the

citizens” because she is an appointed member of the C-TRAN Board without any basis in reality,

because C-TRAN’s legal counsel filed a motion to recover some taxpayer-paid attorney’s fees in

a lawsuit ruled as frivolous.

Councilor Madore publicly accused all members of city councils appointed to the C-TRAN Board

of “suing the citizens” because C-TRAN’s legal counsel filed a motion to recover some taxpayer-

paid attorney’s fees in a lawsuit ruled as frivolous.

Relevant Ethics Code #2: Councilors should promote decorum, respect for others and civility in

all relationships.

Relevant Ethics Code #3: Councilors should actively practice stewardship of the county’s human,

fiscal and material resources.

Relevant Ethics Code #5: Councilors should perform the duties of public office with fairness and

impartiality so to enhance the public confidence in county government.

Evidence: Exhibit 8

Several times during the Comprehensive Planning process which included the development by

Councilor Madore of Alternative 4, Prosecuting Attorney and Planning staff expressed

numerous concerns that Councilor Madore’s actions and words were putting the process in

jeopardy. This escalated to a point where County Planning staff requested legal opinions

regarding Madore’s direction to staff on Alternative 4 and its Planning Assumptions.

Charge #8: Councilor Madore has continually put the county at legal

risk by purposely ignoring legal opinions of the county’s counsel

(Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys Chris Cook and Chris Horne) and,

in fact, creating his own opinions that he presents as his own legal

opinions. Councilor Madore continues to raise issues and

accusations without first investigating whether it is accurate.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

15 | P a g e

On July 13, 2016, during the discussion about a referendum petition to belay the ordinance

adopting the 2016 Comprehensive Plan update, Councilor Madore repeatedly shunned the

expert legal advice of counsel that the petition is not allowed under state law, state case law,

and the Charter.

Madore has several times verbally and on his public Facebook page encouraged legal action

against the Comprehensive Plan, putting the county not only at legal risk but financial risk. He

continues to support a referendum on the Comprehensive Plan that is not allowed under state

law and under the Home Rule Charter.

In his zeal to micromanage the Growth Management Plan update process, Councilor Madore

repeatedly ignored legal counsel advice in development of, and defense of, Alternative 4.

Instead, Councilor Madore attempted to deflect public scrutiny with baseless accusations of

County counsel as well as County staff.

At the regular Council meeting on July 12, 2016, despite the Fee Waiver discussion being

noticed for public comment only (no action) and Council Chair Marc Boldt announcing as the

Fee Waiver agenda items was being introduced that “no action will be taken on this matter”,

Councilor Madore made a motion (an action) to request developer input on the program and to

advertise for the second public comment session. This action would be in violation of the Open

Public Meetings Act.

On a number of occasions, Councilor Madore uses hearsay or “postcard contact” to incite

accusations or implications of guilt without investigating whether there is any factual

evidence10.

These actions put the county at substantial financial and legal risk for continued costs to

taxpayers of legal counsel and defending the county, as well as legal risk that could tie up the

Comprehensive Plan and the county process itself in the legal system for years to come.

These actions also put the comprehensive plans of several small cities at risk by delaying the

effective date of the updated comprehensive plan and opening up for a potential rural land

rush those areas which were to be added to the urban growth areas of those cities, which could

cost those cities millions of dollars in land costs or, if these areas develop into rural estates,

hundreds of future jobs.

10

One of these was the accusations against Councilor Stewart for voting a certain way at a meeting she did not attend. Councilor Madore relied on an email sent by a Portland resident who wasn’t at that meeting himself on which to base his accusation.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

16 | P a g e

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

This document, authored by David Madore, was uploaded to the Grid less than an

hour before the 10:00 AM hearing on October 20, 2015. The public had no chance to

review or provide comment on this document, which was to be an important part of

the Preferred Alternative hearing and consideration.

EXHIBIT 1: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #1.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

18 | P a g e

Below is the hearing agenda for 10/20/2015 which shows the 10:00 AM start time.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

19 | P a g e

Below are minutes11 from the 10/20/15 hearing showing that Councilor Madore was

introducing these for the first time, acknowledging he authored the documents, staff

did not have a role and in fact had not seen these documents, and providing further

evidence of Madore micromanaging and unilaterally controlling the process (note

the use of “I do not plan to act on these”) as well as not allowing for transparency or

appropriate public review of these documents.

11

Complete minutes: https://www.clark.wa.gov/sites/all/files/the-grid/102015F_%20VerbatimCompPlanMinutes.pdf

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

20 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

21 | P a g e

These are from a Public records request. The document is from early November

2015. Councilor Madore requested staff comments on his “Planning Assumptions”

document (in dark blue). Madore’s direction to staff is in the red highlighted area, in

light blue.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

22 | P a g e

This is from the same Public records request, Planning Assumptions, November 2015.

Madore’s direction to staff is in orange. The red highlighted area on the bottom

document is the actual urban/rural split from the 1994 plan (10 percent rural share,

not 20).

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

23 | P a g e

Evidence of Madore’s Micromanagement of the Comprehensive Planning

Process

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

24 | P a g e

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

25 | P a g e

The following are Madore’s public accusations against county staff.

EXHIBIT 2: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #2.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

26 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

27 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

28 | P a g e

The following are excerpts of Councilor Madore’s presentation from the verbatim

October 20, 2015 minutes which shows Councilor Madore admits the “adopted”

VBLM model was the urban model, not the rural one. The supposed RVBLM, that

was developed by GIS staff in July 2015 under his direct supervision and direction,

was never reviewed by Planning Staff nor was it ever reviewed or adopted by the

County Commissioners/Councilors. Planning and Prosecuting Attorney staff have

always noted that the true VBLM has been subject to BOCC approval since the 1990s,

while the rural assumptions have been more simplified.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

29 | P a g e

The following are excerpts of Rebecca Dean’s independent investigation which

concluded Madore’s accusations are false.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

30 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

31 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

32 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

33 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

34 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

35 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

36 | P a g e

The Dean report contains a number of findings with regard to Madore’s use of RW

Thorpe to review his Planning Assumptions and improperly accuses Planning Staff of

not providing Thorpe with the information he had requested be shared with them.

From the Dean report:

From the Green Report are emails showing the transmittal of files to Thorpe:

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

37 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

38 | P a g e

Madore improperly accused Planning Staff “prohibited Thorpe from communicating

with any member of the Board”. The Green Report shows that it was Councilor

Madore himself who suggested that Planning Staff should be “the only

ones…exchanging information with Thorpe”.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

39 | P a g e

The Dean report also cites an incident based on an accusation by Peter Silliman

against Planning Staff for a Shoreline Management Plan hearing that may have been

staged based on collusion between David Madore and Don Benton.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

40 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

41 | P a g e

Evidence of Councilor Madore’s name-calling and outright accusations against his

fellow councilors

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

42 | P a g e

Councilor Madore’s accuses his fellow councilors of abandoning Robert’s Rules of

Order in the Rules of Practice, claiming that Robert’s Rules were required before

2016. In fact, Robert’s Rules are to be used only if the Rules of Practice do not cover

a specific item as needed by the Board, and the 2016 rules carry the same effect.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

43 | P a g e

2014 Rules of Practice Reference to Robert’s Rules

2015 Rules of Practice Reference to Robert’s Rules

2016 Rules of Practice Reference to Robert’s Rules

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

44 | P a g e

Councilor Madore accuses Jeanne Stewart of a vote when she wasn’t even at the

meeting. He later apologized (in the third person) but has left the original accusatory

post on his public Facebook page.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

45 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

46 | P a g e

Councilor Madore caters to special interest group Clark County Citizens United with

respect to reports such as the “Growing Healthier Report”.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

47 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

48 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

49 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

50 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

51 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

52 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

53 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

54 | P a g e

Councilor Madore challenging a grant application from Public Health for reasons that

had nothing to do with the grant:

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

55 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

56 | P a g e

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

57 | P a g e

EXHIBIT 3: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #3.

Councilor Madore invites citizens to comment via his public Facebook page,

but bans people who disagree with him, thus making a “two-way dialogue” he

continues to espouse impossible.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

58 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

59 | P a g e

Evidence of Councilor Madore’s continued defamation of citizens who disagree with

him, calling them members of a “hate group” or “hate site”.

Text from Councilor Madore’s Cell Phone obtained via Public Records request calling

Clark County Citizens for Good Governance (C3G2) a “hate group”. This was a

discussion with County Assessor Peter van Nortwick; Madore’s texts are in blue.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

60 | P a g e

Post from Councilor Madore’s Public Facebook page calling accusing C-TRAN staff of

recruiting for a “hate group”. Councilor Madore personally revised the C3G2 logo to

call it a “hate site”.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

61 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

62 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

63 | P a g e

Play the Race Card” meme

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

64 | P a g e

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

65 | P a g e

EXHIBIT 4: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #4.

These are the 2014 and 2015 RTC 10-Year Transportation priorities lists.

Councilor Madore’s March 2015 Facebook post states “This evening’s RTC

agenda revealed that the most important economic development project in

our county, the $50 million I-5/179th Street Interchange, is not even on the

list of projects to fund” when it was on the 2015 list, and had also been on the

2014 list. He then accuses the City of Vancouver and Councilor Jack Burkman

of pushing a project to bring back the CRC: “Even he appeared to be guessing

that it is part of the CRC project that the voters and our legislature rejected. “

Madore led the effort to try to force RTC to change the rules to move his

project, the I-5 at 179th Street interchange, higher on the priority list without

justification to do so.

Madore’s post and the RTC 10-Year priorities lists from both 2014 and 2015, both

showing the I-5 at 179th Street interchange project, are below.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

66 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

67 | P a g e

EXHIBIT 5: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #5.

The following are summaries of the costs for outside legal counsel due to Councilor

Madore’s actions.

Staff Report: https://www.clark.wa.gov/sites/all/files/the-

grid/d071916PA_FosterPepperInvoice.pdf

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

68 | P a g e

Columbian Article: http://www.columbian.com/news/2016/jul/07/madore-

allegations-cost-clark-county-taxpayers-big-bucks/

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

69 | P a g e

Evidence the Fee Waiver Program in not effective, is not sustainable, and is not

providing a return-on-investment to Clark County taxpayers.

Clark County (Fee Waivers) and Vancouver (limited, targeted family wage job fee

waivers) have similar trends in commercial building permits:

Data souce: The Columbian’s weekly permit summaries.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

70 | P a g e

There is little difference in percent of job growth between the County

(unincorporated area) vs the cities (incorporated areas, no fee waivers):

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

71 | P a g e

There are few non-residential traffic impact fees providing revenue to the

Transportation Improvement Program, resulting in the Road Fund backfilling these

lost revenues or needing to delay projects. The Road Fund balance trend has

continued downward since the Fee Waiver program began:

Data souce: Clark County Public Works.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

72 | P a g e

Excerpts from the Clark County Auditor’s report on the Fee Waiver Program12

12

https://www.clark.wa.gov/sites/all/files/auditor/audit-reports/2014Audit_CC_Job-Creation_Fee_Waiver_Program.pdf

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

73 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

74 | P a g e

Overall Auditor’s Recommendations; to date few if any have been implemented by a

Madore-led council.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

75 | P a g e

EXHIBIT 6: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #6.

December 2015 Facebook post and tweet from Councilor Madore instructing people

how they can get the Columbian without paying for it.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

76 | P a g e

June 2016 Facebook post from Councilor Madore instructing people again how they

can get the Columbian without paying for it.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

77 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

78 | P a g e

Evidence showing Councilor Madore supporting policy decisions such as Alternative 4

long before the public hearing and council deliberation and votes on these matters.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

79 | P a g e

Evidence of preferred treatment for a special interest group – Clark County Citizens

United.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

80 | P a g e

From Gretchen Starke of the Audobon Society

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

81 | P a g e

Evidence of collusion with Clark County Citizens United in development of Current

Use report supporting Rural Population Forecasts for Alternative 4

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

82 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

83 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

84 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

85 | P a g e

From David Madore’s September 20, 2015 calendar

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

86 | P a g e

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

87 | P a g e

EXHIBIT 7: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #7.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

88 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

89 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

90 | P a g e

David Madore Publicly Disputing Judge’s Decision and types of Comments he Incites

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

91 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

92 | P a g e

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

93 | P a g e

EXHIBIT 8: EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ETHICS VIOLATION CHARGE #8.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

94 | P a g e

The 7-12-16 Board meeting was the first of two public meetings to take comment on

the fee waiver program (see agenda below). There could not be any action taken

because the meeting was noticed as a request for comment, not action. Chair Marc

Boldt stated specifically that "no action will be taken".

Councilor Madore made a motion (an action) to request the developers benefiting

from the fee waivers to state if and how the fee waiver program benefited them, and

to take out ads for more public comment. Taking an action where the agenda did not

state action would be taken, and where the Chair specifically stated no action would

be taken, sets the council up for a violation of the Open Public Meetings Act (RCW

42.30).

RCW 42.30.060

Ordinances, rules, resolutions, regulations, etc., adopted at public

meetings—Notice—Secret voting prohibited.

No governing body of a public agency shall adopt any ordinance, resolution,

rule, regulation, order, or directive, except in a meeting open to the public

and then only at a meeting, the date of which is fixed by law or rule, or at a

meeting of which notice has been given according to the provisions of this

chapter. Any action taken at meetings failing to comply with the provisions

of this subsection shall be null and void.

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

95 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

96 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

97 | P a g e

Instances where Councilor Madore’s direct involvement with Alternative 4 caused

concerns raised with and by the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

98 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

99 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

100 | P a g e

Instances where Councilor Madore’s presents his opinion as fact and sets up Clark

County and other entities he has represented for risk of legal liability and litigation

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

101 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

102 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

103 | P a g e

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

104 | P a g e

Instances where Councilor Madore’s uses hearsay evidence to accuse or imply guilt.

PETITION SIGNATURES – 526 CLARK COUNTY CITIZEN VOTERS

Name City State Postal Code

Adam Hill Vancouver Washington 98661

Adam Jones Vancouver Washington 98686

Alan O'Hara Camas Washington 98607

Albanie Nierenberg Camas Washington 98607

Aleta Beck Battle Ground Washington 98604

Alice Linker Vancouver Washington 98662

Alice Rowe Vancouver Washington 98685

Amanda Ronstadt Ridgefield Washington 98642

Amber Ney Vancouver Washington 98661

Amy Hoernig Battle Ground Washington 98604

Amy Kennedy-Palma Battle Ground Washington 98604

AMY OHARA Camas Washington 98607

Amy Platt Vancouver Washington 98661

Amy Steigman Vancouver Washington 98668

Andy Bray Vancouver Washington 98685

Anita Gwinn Amboy Washington 98601

Ann Guard Washougal Washington 98671

Ann Laurier Vancouver Washington 98664

Annalisa Dahlen Vancouver Washington 98662

Audrey Miller Vancouver Washington 98661

B HERZOG Washougal Washington 98671

Barton C Curren Vancouver Washington 98662

Ben Anderson Vancouver Washington 98660

Betty Montgomery Vancouver Washington 98664

Beverly Jones Battle Ground Washington 98604

Bill Baker Vancouver Washington 98682

Bill Baumann Ridgefield Washington 98642

Bill Schmidt Vancouver Washington 98683

Bob Patterson Vancouver Washington 98664

Bonnie Stump Washougal Washington 98671

Bonnie York Battle Ground Washington 98604

Bradford Williams Vancouver Washington 98661

Bradley Abeson Vancouver Washington 98685

Brenda Tiefenthaler Vancouver Washington 98660

Brian Grier Vancouver Washington 98682

Brian Vires Vancouver Washington 98661

Brice Beck Vancouver Washington 98665

Bridget McLeman Vancouver Washington 98686

Brigid Nelson Vancouver Washington 98660

Brittany S. Vancouver Washington 98685

Bryan McGillis Vancouver Washington 98662

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

106 | P a g e

Bryan Wray Vancouver Washington 98660

Butch Lacy Vancouver Washington 98662

Caleb Freeman Vancouver Washington 98685

calvin jutila Vancouver Washington 98661

Calvin Meek Vancouver Washington 98665

Cameron Morrison Vancouver Washington 98685

Candy Bonneville Battle Ground Washington 98604

cara atwell Vancouver Washington 98661

Carla Christian Yacolt Washington 98675

Carla Gish Battle Ground Washington 98604

Carol Hall Vancouver Washington 98660

Carol Taylor Vancouver Washington 98685

Carole Baldwin Battle Ground Washington 98604

Caroline Swansey YACOLT Washington 98675

Cecelia Towner Vancouver Washington 98663

Ceci Mains Vancouver Washington 98663

Chad Strawn Vancouver Washington 98684-0729

Charled Stevens Vancouver Washington 98682

Charles Humble Vancouver Washington 98683

Chelsea Gaya La Center Washington 98629

Cheryl Bledsoe Vancouver Washington 98682

Cheryl Monke Vancouver Washington 98682

Cheryl O'Dell Battle Ground Washington 98604

Chris and Amy Simons Vancouver Washington 98683

Chris Crowley Vancouver Washington 98666

Chris Edmonson Vancouver Washington 98661

Chris Gilson Vancouver Washington 98660

Chris Nielsen La Center Washington 98629

Chris Prothero Vancouver Washington

Christine Blackford Battle Ground Washington 98604

Christine Grier Vancouver Washington 98682

Chuck Green Ridgefield Washington 98642

Chuck Washburn Ridgefield Washington 98642

Cindy Dobbs Vancouver Washington 98685

Cindy Dobson Vancouver Washington 98682

Cindy Haverkate Vancouver Washington 98685

Cindy Miller Vancouver Washington 98682

Cindy Reed Vancouver Washington 98660

Colleen Neel Vancouver Washington 98661

Connie Brown Vancouver Washington 98682

Constance Wilson Vancouver Washington 98661

Cori Wiessner Vancouver Washington 98662

Corrine Anderson-Ketchmark Vancouver Washington 98683

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

107 | P a g e

craig klucas vancouver Washington 98661

Craig Lane Battle Ground Washington 98604

Craig Webster Vancouver Washington 98661

Cynthia Ocegueda Vancouver Washington 98684

Dane Clark Vancouver Washington 98684

Darrell Haynes Brush Prairie Washington 98606

Darrell Strobel Vancouver Washington 98683

Darren Bush Ridgefield Washington 98642

Darryl Olson Vancouver Washington 98661

Dave Boroughs Vancouver Washington 98661

David Blackburn Vancouver Washington 98682

David Cardiff Vancouver Washington 98684

David DeMello Vancouver Washington 98682

David Kinch Vancouver Washington 98683

David Meyer Vancouver Washington 98683

David Miller Brush Prairie Washington 98606

David Myers Vancouver Washington 98683

David Nierenberg Camas Washington 98607

David Olsen Battle Ground Washington 98604

David Rothgeb Vancouver Washington 98663

David Walseth Vancouver Washington 98684

Dean Potter Vancouver Washington 98682

Debbie Ham Vancouver Washington 98693

Deborah Anderson Vancouver Washington 98683

Deborah Nelson Vancouver Washington 98661

Debra Dover Vancouver Washington 98683

Delena Meyer Vancouver Washington 98664

Derek Surratt Vancouver Washington 98683

Desiree de Monye Vancouver Washington 98661

Diane Anicker Vancouver Washington 98661

Diane Figley Vancouver Washington 98661

Diane Mathew Vancouver Washington 98685

diane steindorf Vancouver Washington 98685

Dianna Kretzschmar Washougal Washington 98671

Don Joling Vancouver Washington 98660

Don Meuler Vancouver Washington 98683

Donald Gardner Vancouver Washington 98683

Donna G Sage Vancouver Washington 98662

Donna Goddard Vancouver Washington 98683

Donna Martinez Vancouver Washington 98682

Donna. Egan Vancouver Washington 98683

donnie lewis Vancouver Washington 98660

Drew Bleth Vancouver Washington 98685

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

108 | P a g e

Dustin Zumwalt Battle Ground Washington 98604

Edward Goldhammer Vancouver Washington 98664

Elaine Starratt Vancouver Washington 98684

Eliot Smith Vancouver Washington 98663

Elizabeth Whitman Vancouver Washington 98685

Emily Slebos Vancouver Washington 98682

Emily Wynn Vancouver Washington 98660

Erika Johnson Vancouver Washington 98683

Erling Jenson Vancouver Washington 98684

Esther B Schrader Schrader Vancouver Washington 98683

Eulalia Soto-Esquivel Vancouver Washington 98665

Evalyn Baker Vancouver Washington 98662

Fran Hammond Vancouver Washington 98662

Fred MacKenzie Vancouver Washington 98663

Garrett dabbs Vancouver Washington 98663

garrett hoyt Battle Ground Washington 98604

Gary Hansen Vancouver Washington 98661

Gary Holland Vancouver Washington 98662

Geneva Wood Vancouver Washington 98684

George Boynton La Center Washington 98629

George Guard Washougal Washington 98671

George Taylor Vancouver Washington 98685

Gerry Dunne Battle Ground Washington 98604

Glenn Grossman Vancouver Washington 98663

Glenn Grossman Vancouver Washington 98663

Glorine Montgomery Vancouver Washington 98682

Greg Morris Vancouver Washington 98661

Gregory Johnson Vancouver Washington 98682

Griffin Patterson Vancouver Washington 98664

Harrison Greer Camas Washington 98607

Harry Smith Vancouver Washington 98685

Heath Coop Camas Washington 98607

Heather Johnsen Vancouver Washington 98684

Heather Tischbein Vancouver Washington 98685

Hector Hinojosa Battle Ground Washington 98604

Heidi Atwood Vancouver Washington 98664

Heidi Owens Vancouver Washington 98660

Helen Murray Battle Ground Washington 98604

Helen Nowlin Vancouver Washington 98665

Henry Itkin Vancouver Washington 98665

Hillary J Woodland Washington 98674

Ilmari Kivinen Vancouver Washington 98664

Jack McCracken Vancouver Washington 98668

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

109 | P a g e

Jackson Clark Vancouver Washington 98661

Jacqueline Lane Battle Ground Washington 98604

James Phelps Vancouver Washington 98682

James Smith Vancouver Washington 98684

JAMES TAYLOR Vancouver Washington 98664

James Thomas Vancouver Washington 98661

Jamie Anderson Vancouver Washington 98686

JAN VERRINDER VANCOUVER Washington 98661-6359

Jane Vanvig Vancouver Washington 98663

Janet Leister Battle Ground Washington 98604

Janice Ferguson Washougal Washington 98671

Janice Link Vancouver Washington 98664

Jarom Barela Washougal Washington 98671

Jason Hoover Vancouver Washington 98660

Jason Rayne Vancouver Washington 98686

Jay Glover Vancouver Washington 98661

Jayne Sanders Vancouver Washington 98660

Jaynee Haygood Vancouver Washington 98683

Jean Starke Vancouver Washington 98685

Jeanette Steinhauer Vancouver Washington 98682

Jeanne Caswell Vancouver Washington 98683

Jeannie Jacobs Vancouver Washington 98663

Jeff Elkins Vancouver Washington 98682

Jeff Lynch Vancouver Washington 98684

Jeff607 Shafer Camas Washington 98607

Jeffrey Jenkins Vancouver Washington 98684

Jeffrey Posey Vancouver Washington 98660

Jeffrey Wager Vancouver Washington 98665

Jenn Clark Vancouver Washington 98660

Jennifer Barnes Vancouver Washington 98661

Jennifer Gray Vancouver Washington 98682

Jennifer Green Vancouver Washington 98686

Jennifer Hanberg Vancouver Washington 98684

Jennifer Kimsey Vancouver Washington 98683

jennifer prothero Woodland Washington 98674

Jeremy Boyd Vancouver Washington 98663

Jerry Jeffrey Vancouver Washington 98665

Jessina Murphy Washougal Washington 98671

Jilayne Jordan Vancouver Washington 98660

Jim Mains Vancouver Washington 98663

Jim Martin Vancouver Washington 98682

JM Larkin Battle Ground Washington 98604

Jo Berg Vancouver Washington 98682

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

110 | P a g e

Joan Keil Vancouver Washington 98665

Joan Warren Vancouver Washington 98660

Joe Christie Vancouver Washington 98662

joe McGill Vancouver Washington 98686

Joell Windress Vancouver Washington 98686

John Coutsoubos Battle Ground Washington 98604

John Drury Vancouver Washington 98661

John Golden Vancouver Washington 98663

John Kowalski Camas Washington 98607

John Vanderkin Vancouver Washington 98682

John Weimer Vancouver Washington 98683

Jon Gibert Vancouver Washington 98686

Jon Haralson Washougal Washington 98671

Jon Perry Vancouver Washington 98663

Joni Chambers Vancouver Washington 98685

Joseph Clemons Vancouver Washington 98660

Joseph Hammond Vancouver Washington 98662

Joseph Krajewski Vancouver Washington 98686

Joseph Matter Vancouver Washington 98682

Joyce Lindsay Washougal Washington 98671

Jude Rathbun Vancouver Washington 98682

Judi Low Vancouver Washington 98683

Judith Carlson Vancouver Washington 98683

Judith Chipman Ridgefield Washington 98642

Judith Walseth Vancouver Washington 98684

Judy Crooks Vancouver Washington 98660

Judy Joseph Vancouver Washington 98662

Julie Coop Vancouver Washington 98663

Julie Smith Vancouver Washington 98653

Justin Pintler Vancouver Washington 98665

Justin Stanley Vancouver Washington 98660

Karen Beall Ridgefield Washington 98642

Karen Krajewski Vancouver Washington 98686

Karen Kumpula La Center Washington 98629

Karen Morgan Vancouver Washington 98662

karyn carterby Vancouver Washington 98665

Kate Kohlschmidt Vancouver Washington 98682

Katherine Compton Vancouver Washington 98665-8655

Katherine Livick Vancouver Washington 98685

Kathleen Stevens Vancouver Washington 98661

Kathleen Weber Vancouver Washington 98682

Kathryn Ketcham Vancouver Washington 98660

kathy seabrook Vancouver Washington 98663

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

111 | P a g e

kathybe seabrook Vancouver Washington 98663

Katie Martin Vancouver Washington 98663

Katy Harris Vancouver Washington 98685

Kayla Farrell Vancouver Washington 98662

Kellie Wray Vancouver Washington 98682

kelly caswell Vancouver Washington 98663

Kelly Keigwin Vancouver Washington 98661

Ken Howell Vancouver Washington 98662

Ken McDaniel Vancouver Washington 98683

Ken wa Ridgefield Washington 98642

Kenneth Ross Ridgefield Washington 98642

Kerry Hanson Vancouver Washington 98662

Kerry Jeffrey Vancouver Washington 98686

Kevin Hart Vancouver Washington 98660

Kevin Todd Vancouver Washington 98665

Kkn Husa Vancouver Washington 98661

Kris Wells Vancouver Washington 98682

Krista Holland Vancouver Washington 98662

Kristen Wallway Vancouver Washington 98661

Kristine Liberato Vancouver Washington 98661

Kurt wolfe Vancouver Washington 98663

Kyle Chapman Vancouver Washington n/a

Kyle Greenwood Vancouver Washington 98661

Kyle Potter Vancouver Washington 98685

lakaela olszanski Vancouver Washington 98661

Larry Didier Vancouver Washington 98665

Larry Troy Vancouver Washington 98684

Larry White Vancouver Washington 98685

Laura Anderman Vancouver Washington 98661

Laura Banshak Vancouver Washington 98662

Laura Ross Camas Washington 98607

Laura Schissell Vancouver Washington 98663

Laurel Hess Vancouver Washington 98682

Lauren Shafer Camas Washington 98607

Lauren Wagner Vancouver Washington 98660

Laurie Banks Vancouver Washington 98665

Laurie Burpee Vancouver Washington 98661

Laurie Johnson Vancouver Washington 98682

Leah GREENWOOD Vancouver Washington 98661

Lehman Holder Vancouver Washington 98664

Leigh Viertel Vancouver Washington 98665

Lenora Oftedahl Vancouver Washington 98685

Leslie Austin Johnson Vancouver Washington 98663

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

112 | P a g e

Leslie Baker Vancouver Washington 98660

Leslie Edwards Vancouver Washington 98661

Leslie Morrison Vancouver Washington 98685

Lewis Waters Vancouver Washington 98665

Lian Tigni Vancouver Washington 98665

Linda Anglin Vancouver Washington 98684

linda brown Vancouver Washington 98686

Linda Custer Vancouver Washington 98663

Linda Green Ridgefield Washington 98642

Linda Gwinn La Center Washington 98629

Linda Kirk Vancouver Washington 98684

Linda McClellan Vancouver Washington 98686

Linda Romero Vancouver Washington 98682

Linda Runkle Vancouver Washington 98661

Linda Tubbs Vancouver Washington 98664

Linda Vitola Vancouver Washington 98682

Linda Willinger Vancouver Washington 98684

Lindsay Loveland Brush Prairie Washington 98606

Lisa Avery La Center Washington 98629

Lisa Dennis Vancouver Washington 98685

Lisa Ghormley Vancouver Washington 98663

Lisa Henry Vancouver Washington 98686

Lisa Larson Ridgefield Washington 98642

Lois Johnson Vancouver Washington 98686

Lois Murphy Vancouver Washington 98660

Lora Caine Ridgefield Washington 98642-9010

Loren Lee Vancouver Washington 98685

Loretta Capeheart Vancouver Washington 98663

Loretta Weddle Camas Washington 98607

Lori Abeson Vancouver Washington 98685

Lori Oberheide Vancouver Washington 98685

Luana Nery Vancouver Washington 98684

Lucinda Karlic Vancouver Washington 98686

Lyn Reames-Pryor Camas Washington 98607

Lynne Lincoln Vancouver Washington 98684

Madeleine Dulemba Vancouver Washington 98663

Mae Onosaki Vancouver Washington 98682-6533

Malcolm Estes Camas Washington 98607

Marcia McReynolds Vancouver Washington 98663

Margaret Makinster Amboy Washington 98601

Margaret Perry Vancouver Washington 98663

Marian Neumann Camas Washington 98607

Marilynne Taylor Vancouver Washington 98664

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

113 | P a g e

Mark Carter Vancouver Washington 98660

Mark O'Connor Battle Ground Washington 98604

Mark Owsley Vancouver Washington 98664

Marlene Jenson Vancouver Washington 98684

Marlice Bryant Vancouver Washington 98661

Martha Atteridge Camas Washington 98607

Marty Porter Vancouver Washington 98663

Mary Falkenhagen Vancouver Washington 986854

Mary ODonnell Vancouver Washington 98685

Mary Orange Vancouver Washington 98686

Mary Webster Vancouver Washington 98685

Marylou Mansfield Vancouver Washington 98685

MaryLynn Smith Vancouver Washington 98663

Matthew Thompson Vancouver Washington 98685

Matthew Vilhauer Vancouver Washington 98663

Maurice Savoie Vancouver Washington 98665

Max Murphy Washougal Washington 98671

Maxine Davison Vancouver Washington 98663

Melanie MacPherson Vancouver Washington 98666

Melisa Smith Camas Washington 98607

Melissa Clark Vancouver Washington 98684

Melissa Valo Vancouver Washington 98661

meredith graff Vancouver Washington 98663

Michael Buzan Camas Washington 98607

Michael Harrington Vancouver Washington 98664

Michael Henry Vancouver Washington 98686

Michael Olson Vancouver Washington 98660

Michael Spence Vancouver Washington 98683

Michael Tognetti Vancouver Washington 98685

Michele Wollert Vancouver Washington 98663

Michelle Seekins Camas Washington 98607

Mike Ellison Vancouver Washington 98663

Mike Emrick Vancouver Washington 98682

Mike Kretzschmar Vancouver Washington 98664

Mike Schroetke Vancouver Washington 98682

Mike Turnauer Vancouver Washington 98683

Mikhail Oparin Vancouver Washington 98665

Milton Jones Vancouver Washington 98663

Mimi Latta Washougal Washington 98671

Mindy Harris Vancouver Washington 98665

Misty DeWitt Vancouver Washington 98686

Mollie Gustafson Vancouver Washington 98682

Molly Coston Washougal Washington 98671

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

114 | P a g e

Morris Foutch Vancouver Washington 98685

Murray Pence Vancouver Washington 98683

Nan Henriksen Camas Washington 98607

Nancy Biheller Vancouver Washington 98663

Nancy J. McCormack Camas Washington 98607

Nancy Jeffrey Vancouver Washington 98660

Nancy Ryan Vancouver Washington 98682

Nancy Schultz Vancouver Washington 98660

Nancy Vartanian Vancouver Washington 98660

NancyAnn Dalrymple Vancouver Washington 98663

Nathan Bardue Vancouver Washington 98660

Nettie Pullella-Barca Battle Ground Washington 98604

Nicole Olsen La Center Washington 98629

Paige Pienkowski Vancouver Washington 98660

Patrice Jacob Ridgefield Washington 98642

Patricia Bergren Washougal Washington 98671

Patricia jollota Vancouver Washington 98663

patricia jollota Vancouver Washington 98663

Patricia Nierenberg Camas Washington 98607

Patricia Wells Vancouver Washington 98682

Patricia Wray Vancouver Washington 98665

Patt Doyle Heisson Washington 98622

Paula Reynolds La Center Washington 98629

pauly vachal vancouver Washington 98682

Peter Adrian Vancouver Washington 98683

Peter Harrison Vancouver Washington 98686

Rachel Niten Ridgefield Washington 98642

Rahim Abbasi Vancouver Washington 98663

Ralph Meuler Washougal Washington 98671

randall English Vancouver Washington 98684

Ray Mongrain Camas Washington 98607

Rayne Prothero Vancouver Washington 98661

Rebecca Davis Vancouver Washington 98682

Rebecca Wiegand Vancouver Washington 98682

Rebecca York La Center Washington 98629

Rees Buttimer Vancouver Washington 98662

rekah strong Vancouver Washington 98683

Ren Autrey Vancouver Washington 98663

Rhonda Hunter Vancouver Washington 98684

Rich Raitano La Center Washington 98629

Richard Cody Vancouver Washington 98663

Richard Condon Vancouver Washington 98663

Richard Dyrland Ridgefield Washington 98642

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

115 | P a g e

Richard Wollert Vancouver Washington 98663

Rob Coapman Vancouver Washington 98683

Rob White Vancouver Washington 98664

Robert Aichele Ridgefield Washington 98642

Robert Andrews Vancouver Washington 98686

Robert Baldwin Vancouver Washington 98663

Robert Berg Camas Washington 98607

Robert C ROSENTRETER Vancouver Washington 98662

Robert Higbie Vancouver Washington 98660

Robert Hill Vancouver Washington 98662

Robert Richer Vancouver Washington 98660

Robert Thompson Vancouver Washington 98664

Rod Morris Washougal Washington 98671

roy valo Vancouver Washington 98661

Russell Hanson Vancouver Washington 98660

Russell Williams Vancouver Washington 98661

Ruth T. Williams Vancouver Washington 98683

Ryan Halvorsen Vancouver Washington 98686

Samantha Parton Vancouver Washington 98661

Samuel Atkinson RN Vancouver Washington 98682

Samuel Stribling Vancouver Washington 98661

Sandra Finn Camas Washington 98607

Sandra Gaughan Battle Ground Washington 98604

Sandy Brenteson Vancouver Washington 98664

Sara Carter Vancouver Washington 98660

Sara Douglas Vancouver Washington 98685

Sarah Kerr Brush Prairie Washington 98606

Sarah Shafer Camas Washington 98607

Sarah Wilson Vancouver Washington 98665

scott busch vancouver Washington 98684

Scott Warren Vancouver Washington 98683

Seamus Davis Vancouver Washington 98665

Sean Guard Washougal Washington 98671

Sean Savageau Vancouver Washington 98663

Sharon Giberson Woodland Washington 98674

Sharron DeSautel Vancouver Washington 98682

Sherri James Vancouver Washington 98664

Shirley Waltz Vancouver Washington 98683

Silja Stanley vancouver Washington 98660

Skyler Lloyd Vancouver Washington 98682

Stacie Waddle Vancouver Washington 98682

Stephanie Rice Vancouver Washington 98665

Steve Durspek Vancouver Washington 98665

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

116 | P a g e

Steve Foster Vancouver Washington 98685

Steve McGillis Vancouver Washington 98686-4140

Steve McGillis Vancouver Washington 98686

Steven Adams Vancouver Washington 98685

Steven Berg Vancouver Washington 98682

Steven Harkin Vancouver Washington 98682

STEVEN HAWKINS Vancouver Washington 98683

Steven Koch Washougal Washington 98671

Steven Kuyatt Vancouver Washington 98682

Stuart Riley Vancouver Washington 98686

Sue Emrick Vancouver Washington 98682

Suzanne Pupo Vancouver Washington 98661

Suzette Pump Vancouver Washington 98663

Sybille Guy Guy Camas Washington 98607

TABITHA STOKES VANCOUVER Washington 98685

Tamara Lieb camas Washington 98607

Tammie Sullivan Vancouver Washington 98686

Taryn Loun Camas Washington 98607

Ted Bulger Vancouver Washington 98663

Ted Schatz Vancouver Washington 98663

Teri Owen Vancouver Washington 98664

Terri Brooks Vancouver Washington 98664

Terry Eaton Brush Prairie Washington 98606

Terry Hashemi Battle Ground Washington 98604

Terry Murphy Washougal Washington 98671

Terry Reddish Battle Ground Washington 98604

Terry Reigle Vancouver Washington 98662

Terry Toland Vancouver Washington 98685

Tess Strickland Vancouver Washington 98664

Thomas Gibson CAMAS Washington 98607

Thomas Rasmussen Vancouver Washington 98685

Thomas Shank Vancouver Washington 98665

Thomas Shoenberger Brush Prairie Washington 98606

thomas wooldridge Ridgefield Washington 98642

Tim Gaughan Battle Ground Washington 98604

Timothy Earp Vancouver Washington 98661

Tom Walsh Washougal Washington 98671

Traci Meyer-Jones Vancouver Washington 98663

Trisha Hunter Vancouver Washington 98661

Trisha Lillard Vancouver Washington 98661

Troy Maxcy Vancouver Washington 98662

uwe plumhoff la center Washington 98629

Val Alexander La Center Washington 98629

Ethics Complaint Against Councilor David Madore July 19, 2016

117 | P a g e

Vickie Gibson Camas Washington 98607

Vicky Ridge-Cooney BATTLE GROUND Washington 986046423

Victoria Chambers Vancouver Washington 98661

WALTER DYKES Vancouver Washington 98682

Wanda Nelson Camas Washington 98607

Wayne Cowley Vancouver Washington 98684

William Cantrell Vancouver Washington 98682

William Ghormley Vancouver Washington 98661

William J Giberson Woodland Washington 98674

William Maiden Vancouver Washington 98682

Yvonne Andrews Vancouver Washington 98686

Zbigniew Swiderek Vancouver Washington 98683