estimating – with confidence!

16
Estimating – with confidence!

Upload: teva

Post on 15-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Estimating – with confidence!. Case study…. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Estimating –  with confidence!

Estimating – with confidence!

Page 2: Estimating –  with confidence!

Case study…

The amount of potassium in the blood varies slightly from day to day and this fact (along with routine measurement errors) means that successive readings of a patient’s potassium level will show a small variation with a standard deviation of = 0.2 mmol/L with a range of 3.5 – 5.0 mmol/L being cosidered normal. A significantly different value could indicate possible renal failure. A patient has 1 K-test performed and presents a

reading of 3.4 mmol/L. How reliable is this 1 measure? Can we quantify our confidence in this reading?

Page 3: Estimating –  with confidence!

A confidence Interval If we assume that the errors in measuring K

are normally distributed then we can use z-scores to help quantify our confidence in this reading:

The reading of X=3.4 mmol/L is our estimate of the true value of the parameter “K blood-level concentration”

A 90% confidence interval would represent a range of readings that we would expect to get 90% of the time.

Page 4: Estimating –  with confidence!

Solution…

Use the correct z-value for 90%

95% of area left of this point5% of area left of this

point

The correct z values are -1.645 and +1.645 and are usually denoted z* to indicate that these are special ones chosen with a

particluar confidence level “C” in mind. In this example C = 90%

Page 5: Estimating –  with confidence!

Using the z-score formula we get:

*X

z

* * , * 1.645z X z z

3.4 1.645 0.2 3.4 1.645 0.2X

90% of the readings will be expected to fall in the range (3.1,3.7) mmol/L

Suppose 5 tests were performed over a number of days and eachtime gave a result of 3.4 mmol/L. How would that change the range of numbers in the confidence interval?

Page 6: Estimating –  with confidence!

Using Confidence Intervals when Determining the True value of a Population Mean

We rarely ever know the population mean – instead we can construct SRS’s and measure sample means.

A confidence interval gives us a measure of how precisely we know the underlying population mean

We assume 3 things: We can construct “n” SRS’s The underlying population of sample means is

Normal We know the standard deviation

Page 7: Estimating –  with confidence!

This gives …

Confidence interval for a population mean:

* *X z X zn n

We measure this

We infer this

Number of samplesor tests

Page 8: Estimating –  with confidence!

Example: Fish or Cut Bait?

A biologist is trying to determine how many rainbow trout are in an interior BC lake. To do this he uses a large net that filters 6000 m3 of lake water in each trial. He drops the net in a specific area and records the mean number of fish caught in 10 trials. This represents one SRS. From this he is able to determine a mean and standard deviation for the number of fish in 100 SRS’s. Each SRS has the same = 9.3 fish with a sample mean of 17.5 fish. How precisely does he know the true mean of fish/6000 m3? Use C = 90%If the volume of the lake is60 million m3, how many trout are in the lake?

Page 9: Estimating –  with confidence!

Solution:

Since C = 0.90, z* = 1.645

* *

9.3 9.317.5 1.645( ) 17.5 1.645( )10 10

z X zn n

X

There is a 90% chance that the true mean number of fish/6000 m3 lies in the range (16.0,19.0) Total number of fish: He is 90% confident that there are between 160 000 and 190 000 fish in the lake.

Why should you be skeptical of this result?

Page 10: Estimating –  with confidence!

Margin of Error

When testing confidence limits you are saying that your statistical measure of the mean is:

ie: X = 3.2 cm +/- 1.1 cm with a 90% confidence

estimate +/- the margin of error

Page 11: Estimating –  with confidence!

Math view…

Mathematically the margin of error is:

You can reduce the margin of error by• increasing the number of samples you test• making more precise measurements (makes

smaller)

*zn

Page 12: Estimating –  with confidence!

Matching Sample Size to Margin of Error

An IT department in a large company is testing the failure rate of a new high-end graphics card in 200 of its work stations. 5 cards were chosen at random with the following lifetime per failure (measured in 1000’s of hours) and = 0.5:

1 2 3 4 5

1.4 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.8

Provide a 90% confidence level for the mean lifetime of these boards.

Page 13: Estimating –  with confidence!

1.4 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.81.66

5X

0.5* 1.66 1.645( ) 1.66 0.37

5X z

n

IT is 90% confident that the mean lifetime of these boards is between 1290 and 2030 hours.

HoweverHowever – these are expensive boards and accounting wants to have the margin of error reduced to 0.10 with a 90% confidence level. What should IT do?

2* ( * )m z n zmn

IT needs to test 68 machines!

Page 14: Estimating –  with confidence!

Important Caveats…

Read page 426 carefully!Data must be a SRSOutliers can wreak havoc!We “fudged” our knowledge of in general

we don’t know thisPoorly collected data or bad experiment design

cannot be overcome by fancy formulas!

Page 15: Estimating –  with confidence!

Examples…

6.13 6.18 6.19 6.30

Page 16: Estimating –  with confidence!

In conclusion…

This whole discussion rests on your understanding of z-scores. If you are OK with this then just review the new terms and try the previous examples

If you are still “rusty” or un-sure about z-scores, come and see me!