establishment and strengthening of a national research and innovation system: experience from the...
TRANSCRIPT
Establishment and strengthening of a national research and innovation system: Experience from the German Research System and DFG’s operations.
Dr. Jörg SchneiderDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft(German Research Foundation – DFG)
Warning …..
Statistics – at least recent statistics – are difficult to obtain.
Therefore, some of the figures are more educated guesses….
But always good enough to make the point I want to make.
!2
Innovation System – a healthy tree …
R&D products forSociety, Economy,Health, Environment…
…fed bypre-competitive applied research, problem-driven…
… and growing onbasic research,science-driven
3
… if provided for adequately!
€
€
€€
€€€
€
€
€€
€€
€€
€
€
€
€
€
Top down funding, problem-oriented
€
€
€
€€ € €
€€€
€€€
€€
€
€
€
Bottom up funding, quality-oriented, but no thematicprogrammatics!
Industrialproducts
Advice for politicsAnd society
Healthcare
Supply of food, Water, energy
Sound bio-diversity
Clean & healthyenvironment
€€
€
€
€ €
€€
€
€
€
€
4
(estimated according to BMBF Report 2014)
84 Mrd. € for R & D
Federal16,4
Enterprises51,5
Joint Funding States: 2,3Federal: 5,1
Federal Research Institutes
1,7
UniversitiesLänder: 8 (+10 for educ.)
Bund: 1,1
Federal progr., problem-oriented
7,7
Other2,8
DFGMPGWGLHGFFhG…
States13,3
International Research Institutes
1,0
R&D Expenditures in Germany 2011
5
► In March 2000, the European Council decided, during its Summit in
Lissabon, to develop Europe into “the most competitive and the most
dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world” by 2010.
► In order to achieve this ambitious aim, two major measures
were decided:
1. To increase employment throughout Europe
2. To increase R&D expenditure upt to 3% of GDP
► Germany is close, the Government wants more, but…..
Lissabon-Agreement: 3% of European GDP for R&D
6
Gross domestic expenditure on RD in selected countries
Datenquelle: OECD (2015), Main Science and Technology Indicators, Vol. 2014/2, OECD Publishing, Paris. Zu Singapur und Namibia: http://data.uis.unesco.org
Namibia 2010
South Africa
UK 2012
Canada 2012
Singapore 2012
EU 28 2012
France 2012
USA 2012
OECD 2012
Finland 2013
Switzerland 2012
Sweden 2013
Germany 2012
Korea (Rep.) 2011
China (VR) 2013
Japan 2013
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
20%
38%
46%
47%
53%
54%
55%
59%
60%
61%
61%
61%
66%
74%
75%
76%
79%
45%
29%
34%
39%
34%
35%
31%
30%
26%
25%
28%
29%
25%
21%
17%
0%
3%
6%
12%
2%
3%
2%
6%
5%
2%
2%
4%
0%
1%
3%
7%
2%
13%
20%
6%
6%
10%
8%
4%
5%
12%
12%
7%
4%
0%
1%
1%
Business enterprise Government Other national sources Abroad
3,5 %
2,0 %
4,0 %
2,9 %
3,3 %
3,0 %
3,3 %
2,4 %
2,8 %
2,2 %
1,9 %
2,0 %
1,7 %
1,6 %
0,8 %
0,1 %
% GDP
It is important that the private sector takes responsibility!
7
Triadic patent families in selected countries 2011 total number number per million inhabitants
Source: OECD (2014)http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/factbook-2014-63-de
TurkeySouth Africa
HungaryBrazil
New ZealandRussian Federation
IrelandNorway
SpainIndia
AustraliaDenmark
FinlandIsrael
AustriaBelgiumCanada
ItalySweden
SwitzerlandNetherlands
ChinaUK
KoreaFrance
GermanyUnited States
Japan
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Slovenia
Spain
Iceland
New Zealand
Australia
Italy
Canada
Ireland
Norway
UK
Luxembourg
Belgium
France
Korea (Rep.)
Austria
Israel
USA
Denmark
Netherlands
Finland
Germany
Sweden
Switzerland
Japan
0 20 40 60 80 100 1208
76%
61%
66%61%
61%
59%
55%
46%
47%
Triadic: patents are registered in Europe, Japan & US
Major Players within German Research System (simplified!!!)
Institutional funding
Federal Government
Länder
Private sector
Intramuralresearch laboratories
Federationof Industrial CooperativeResearch Associations
DFG
HGF
MPG
FhG
WGL
Federal institutionsperforming R&D
Länder insti-tuitions per-forming R&D
Academies
Higher EducationSector
Project funding
Federal Government
Private sector
DFG
Federal Government
Länder Governments
Business enterprise
sector Source: BuFo 2000
Research -Funders -Performers
9
Why is the German system so complicated?
1. Deutsches Grundgesetz (German Constitution) in Article 5 (Basic Human Rights): The arts and sciences, research and education are free. Thus, the Govern-ments have to provide free money!
2. On the other hand, the Governments have to ensure problem-oriented research (competitiveness of econo-my, well-being of citizens and nature).
3. Finally: according to the Grundgesetz and the principle of subsidiarity the responsibility for science and education (and for the universities) lies with the Länder (federal states), not the Federal Government.
10
What does it mean for research (funding)?
• Nearly all universities belong to the 16 federal states, funding for teaching and
basic funding for research from states, not from federal government!
• Due to the German Constitution (Grundgesetz), the Federal Government is
not allowed to support universities directly, very few exceptions which have to
be legalized by treaties between federal government and all 16 states!
• Extra-university research institutes (Max-Planck, Fraunhofer, Helmholtz,
Leibniz) are jointly funded by federal and state governments (as regulated by
constitution, law and several by-laws).
Conclusion: it may look complicated, but it is a very well ballanced
interplay between several key (f)actors
Major Players within German Research Funding (simplified!!!)
Institutional funding
Federal Government
Länder
Private sector
Intramuralresearch laboratories
Federationof Industrial CooperativeResearch Associations
DFG
HGF
MPG
FhG
WGL
Federal institutionsperforming R&D
Länder insti-tuitions per-forming R&D
Academies
Higher EducationSector
Project funding
Federal Government
Private sector
DFG
Federal Government
Länder Governments
Business enterprise
sector Source: BuFo 2000
Research -Funders -Performers
12
Division of tasks within the public system
Problem-driven research Science-driven research
Institutional funding
• Leibniz Institutes• Helmholtz Institutes • Federal Research Inst.• Joint Research C. EU• AiF Member Institutes
• Max-Planck Institutes• Fraunhofer Institutes• CERN• EMBL
Project funding
• Ministerial Funding Pro-rams (e.g. Water management, Biotech)
• EU Funding Prg. (e.g. Car of the Future, Cardiovascular Diseases)
• DFG• Fellowship programs
(DAAD, AvH, EU-Marie Curie)
• European Research Council (ERC)
13
► Federal Government – top down thematic programs
► Federal Government – DAAD and AvH
► Federal Government – federal ministerial research institutes
► Länder Governments – universities
► Länder Governments – federal ministerial research institutes
► Both together – Joint funding of● German Research Foundation DFG
● Max Planck Society
● Fraunhofer Society
● Helmholtz Association
● Leibniz Association
● various smaller institutions
► Further joint efforts to strengthen innovation system
German Research System – publically funded
14
R&D Budgets of Federal Ministries
Source: Federal Report on Research and Innovation 2014, BMBF 15
Research project funding by Federal Ministries
Source: Federal Report on Research and Innovation 2014, BMBF 16
► Federal Government – top down thematic programmes
► Federal Government – DAAD and AvH
► Federal Government – federal ministerial research institutes
► Länder Governments – universities
► Länder Governments – federal ministerial research institutes
► Both together – Joint funding of● German Research Foundation DFG
● Max Planck Society
● Fraunhofer Society
● Helmholtz Association
● Leibniz Association
● various smaller institutions
► Further joint efforts to strengthen innovation system
German Research System – publically funded
17
Mobility Funding by Federal Government
Federal Foreign Office 184 Mio € 38 Mio €
Fed. Min. Education & Research 101 Mio € 60 Mio €
Fed. Min. Economic Coo. & Development 40 Mio € 6 Mio € European Commission (Erasmus ….) 60 Mio € Other Sources 45 Mio € 6 Mio €
Total budget 430 Mio € (2014) 110 Mio € (2013)
mobility of students/education sector
mobility of researchers
18
► Federal Government – top down thematic programmes
► Federal Government – DAAD and AvH
► Federal Government – federal ministerial research institutes
► Länder Governments – Universities
► Länder Governments – federal ministerial research institutes
► Both together – Joint funding of● German Research Foundation DFG
● Max Planck Society
● Fraunhofer Society
● Helmholtz Association
● Leibniz Association
● various smaller institutions
► Further joint efforts to strengthen innovation system
German Research System – publically funded
19
Institutions of Higher Education IHE
In Germany (2012): 427 IHE with 2,5 Mio. students
26 % IHE are universities (108) with 65% of all students
74% IHE are Universites of Applied Sciences – Fachhochschulen and similar
46% pupils from one year go to IHE
® PhD can only be granted by Universites
Source: Federal Statistics Bureau
Universities
Universitiesof Applied Sciences
108 Universities
65% of students
31% of students
. .% of Students
20
R&D at German Universities – Third Party Funding 2012
Source: www.statista.com21 [email protected]
Basic funding for R&Dby Länder: about 10 Bil. €
DFG
Federal Government
Private Sector
European Union
Foundations
Länder
Total
► Federal Government – top down thematic programmes
► Federal Government – DAAD and AvH
► Federal Government – federal ministerial research institutes
► Länder Governments – universities
► Länder Governments – federal ministerial research institutes
► Both together – Joint funding of● German Research Foundation DFG
● Max Planck Society
● Fraunhofer Society
● Helmholtz Association
● Leibniz Association
● various smaller institutions
► Further joint efforts to strengthen innovation system
German Research System – publically funded
22
► 80 Institutes
► Budget: 1.8 B €
► 17,000 employees incl.
5,200 scientists
►plus 13,400 „students“
► Central Administration with
500 admin. staff
► Mission: high quality basic research - „Nobel Awards“
Research Organizations: Max-Planck Society
Basic researchHarnack-prinziple
23
Research Organizations: Fraunhofer Society
► 66 Institutes
► Budget: 1.9 B €
► 22,000 employees
► Incl. 6,403 „students“
► Central Administration with
300 admin. staff
► Mission: high quality applied research - „earn money“
applied research30/30/40
24
Research Organizations: Helmholtz Association
► 18 Institutes
► Budget: 3.8 B €
► 33,000 employees
► Incl. 16,000 scientists
► Central Office with
70 admin. staff
► Mission: high quality problem-oriented, long-term research
Long termLarge instruments
25
Research Organizations: Leibniz Association
► 86 Institutes
► Budget: 1.5 B €
► 17,000 employees
► Incl. 8,000 scientists
► Central Office with
60 admin. staff
► Mission: high quality problem-oriented research
Regular independentevaluation
26
► Federal Government – top down thematic programmes
► Federal Government – DAAD and AvH
► Federal Government – federal ministerial research institutes
► Länder Governments – universities
► Länder Governments – federal ministerial research institutes
► Both together – Joint funding of● German Research Foundation DFG
● Max Planck Society
● Fraunhofer Society
● Helmholtz Association
● Leibniz Association
● various smaller institutions
► Further joint efforts to strengthen innovation system
German Research System – publically funded
27
Pact for Research and InnovationPakt für Forschung und Innovation
The Pact for Research and Innovation is designed to give
financial planning security to institutions that are jointly
funded by the Federal Government and the Länder (states): ► Max Planck Society MPG
► Fraunhofer Society FhG
► Helmholtz Association HGF
► Leibniz Association WGL
► German Research Foundation DFG
2005 – 2010: Budget increase of 5% every year
2011 – 2015: Budget increase of 5% every year
2016 – 2020: Budget increase of 3% every year
28
Higher Education Pact 2020Hochschulpakt 2020
Pillar 1: Program for the admission of additional university entrants
2007 – 2023
Federal Government invests 20.3 billion €
states invest 18.3 billion €
for new university places for students
Not for research!!!!
!!! Pact 2020 come on top of Quality Pact for Teaching !!!
2011 – 2020 Federal Government provides 2 billion € for the
improvement of teaching at universities
29
Higher Education Pact 2020Hochschulpakt 2020
Pillar 2: Program allowances (overheads) for
projects funded by DFG
2010 – 2015 2.3 billion € as pilot
project
exclusively by Federal Government for 20%
overheads on DFG project funding
2016 – 2020 2.2 billion € now jointly
20% by Federal Government
2% by state governments together
(according to Königstein Key)
30
Excellence InitiativeTop-class research for even better competitiveness
2005 – 2011 1.9 billion €
2012 – 2017 2.7 billion €
2017 – ??? similar investments
75% Federal State
25 % host state of funded institution
2005 – 2017; currently funded:
► 45 Graduate Schools
► 43 Clusters of Excellence
► 11 Institutional Strategies
31
December 2014 – a Turning Point in German Research Funding
► Both Houses of the German Parliament agree
on loosening the constitutional prohibition of
long-term federal investments in university
research!
► From 2015 on, Federal Government will cover
annual budget of the states for students support
1,2 billion € in 2015. Condition: states have to
invest money in education
32
► Federal Government – top down thematic programmes
► Federal Government – DAAD and AvH
► Federal Government – federal ministerial research institutes
► Länder Governments – universities
► Länder Governments – federal ministerial research institutes
► Both together – Joint funding of
● German Research Foundation DFG
● Max Planck Society
● Franhofer Society
● Helmholtz Association
● Leibniz Annsociation
● various smaller institutions
► Further joint efforts to strengthen innovation system
German Research System – publically funded
33
Institution Federal : States share of Länder (federal states)
Helmholtz 90 : 10 host state Fraunhofer 90 : 10 66% host state, 33% according to Königstein key (of 30 %!!!!!)Max Planck 50 : 50 50% host state, 50% according to Königstein key
Leibniz 50 : 50research institutes
75% host state, 25% according to Königstein key
service institutes
25% host state, 75% according to Königstein key
DFG (basic funds) 58 : 42 according to Königstein key DFG (Excellence In.) 75 : 25 host state DFG (20% overheads)DFG (22% overheads)
100 : 091 : 9
No shareaccording to Königstein key
DFG (large equipment) 50 : 50 Host state Academies' Program 50 : 50 host state Leopoldina 80 : 20 host state Wissenschaftskolleg 50 : 50 host state Research at FHs 100 : 0 no share
Joint Funding
from 2016 !
34
Federal State Share in % Federal State Share in %
Baden-Würtemberg 12,81503 Niedersachsen 9,31388
Bayern 15,19297 Nordrhein-Westfalen 21,44227
Berlin 5,03822 Rheinland-Pfalz 4,81284
Brandenburg 3,10452 Saarland 1,23114
Bremen 0,93119 Sachsen 5,16869
Hamburg 2,54537 Sachsen-Anhalt 2,92874
Hessen 7,22575 Schleswig-Holstein 3,37218
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 2,08237 Thüringen 2,79484
Sum 100%
Königstein Key (2010)
35
DFG is driven by scientific demand
► DFG acts and funds bottom up
► no thematic priorities (rare exceptions)
► no regional priorities
► no political priorities
► no political influence
► everything decided by scientists
► everything in competition
► everything in peer review
► Funding only if institution agrees
on ethical standards
DFG‘s Funding Instruments – all open to international co-
operation
and to foreign researchers working in Germany
Funding Programmes
InfrastructureInternational
Scientific Contacts
Coordinated Programmes
Individual Grants
► Individual Research Grants
► Mercator Guest Professorships
► Reinhard Koselleck-Projects
Awards
►Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz-Prize
►many more
Promoting Young Researchers
► Research Fellowships
► One‘s own position
► Emmy Noether-Programme
► Heisenberg-Programme ► Research Units
► Priority Programmes
► Collaborative Research
Centres► International Research
Training Groups► Excellence Initiative
37
DFG is driven by scientific demand
► DFG acts and funds bottom up
► no thematic priorities (rare exceptions)
► no regional priorities
► no political priorities
► no political influence
► everything decided by scientists
► everything in competition
► everything in peer review
► Funding only if institution agrees on
ethical standards
38
How is the DFG structured?
Senate (36+3 scientists)
Executive Commitee
Ex. Board & 8 Vice-
Presidents
Joint Committee (Senate & 17/32 Governmental
representatives)
Executive Board
President Secretary GeneralHead Office
Reviewers assess funding proposals
All eligible scientists and academics
48 Review Boards (elected!)
General Assembly (members!) elect, select, appoint
cooperate
approves annual report and account approbates the Executive Committee establishes directives
ensurequality
39
Presidents (since1980)
E. Seibold (1980 - 1985)
H. Markl (1986 -
1991)
W. Frühwald (1992 -
1997)
E.-L. Winnacker (1998 - 2006)
M. Kleiner (2007 - 2012)
Vizepräsidenten
President + 8 vice-presidents of DFGExecutive Committee
M. Famulok(Chemistry)
P. Funke(History)
W. Ertmer(Physics)
K. Becker(Biology)
L. Bruckner-Tuderman(Medicine)
M. Hochbruck(Mathematics)
W. Schön(Law)
F. Allgöwer(Engineering)
M. Barner, President GermanFounders Association, Guest
Peter Strohschneider
Secretary General:Ms Dorothee Dzwonnek
DFG is driven by scientific demand
► DFG acts and funds bottom up
► no thematic priorities (rare exceptions)
► no regional priorities
► no political priorities
► no political influence
► everything decided by scientists
► everything in competition
► everything in peer review
► Funding only if institution agrees on
ethical standards
41
The DFG´s Head Office
Department I Central Administration
ExecutiveOffices
Quality Assurance
and ProgrammeDevelopment
Inter-nationalAffairs
Press and
Public Relations
Economicsand
Auditing
Berlin Office
Internal Advisory Committee
Extended Executive Board
Heads of Divisions and Executive-Level Offices
Executive BoardPresident
Secretary General
Deputy Members:Heads of Departments I to III
ForumHeads of Divisions
Budget and Accounting
Human Resources/Legal Affairs
Information Technology and Infrastructure
Information Management
Administrative Support for DFG Offices
Department II Scientific Affairs
Department III Coordinated Programmes
and Infrastructure
Research Centres
Research Careers Scientific Library Services
and Information Systems Scientific Instrumentation
and Information Technology
Humanities and Social Sciences
Life Sciences 1 Life Sciences 2 Physics, Mathematics,
Geosciences Chemistry and Process
Engineering Engineering Sciences
42
DFG is driven by scientific demand
► DFG acts and funds bottom up
► no thematic priorities (rare exceptions)
► no regional priorities
► no political priorities
► no political influence
► everything decided by scientists
► everything in competition
► everything in peer review
► Funding only if institution agrees on
ethical standards
43
DFG is driven by scientific demand
► DFG acts and funds bottom up
► no thematic priorities (rare exceptions)
► no regional priorities
► no political priorities
► no political influence
► everything decided by scientists
► everything in competition
► everything in peer review
► Funding only if institution agrees
on ethical standards
International cooperation for setting the right perspective!
45
Major task: working on framework conditions for optimal international cooperation for German researchers
Global forum for non-ministerial research (funding) organizations
46
Internationally: Cooperate on joint standards of projects selection, scientific conduct, general ethics, open access,Brain circulation,IPR, …..
Annual Regional MeetingSub-Saharan Africa 2014 – 2016(?)
Advocating basic research once again and finally…… Top down funding, problem-oriented
Industrialproducts
Advice for politicsAnd society
Healthcare
Supply of food, Water, energy
Sound bio-diversity
Clean & healthyenvironment
No basic research:
Results have to bebrought in from anoutside system!
Same is true for students!!!!!
47
GDP and Expenditure on R&D (GERD) per capita in selected countries, 2011 or in the most recent year
Source: http://data.uis.unesco.org, datasets: demographic and
socio-economic, science,technology and innovation
GERD per capita in current PPP$
Namibia 2010
South Africa 2010
China 2011
UK 2011
Canada 2011
France 2011
Japan 2011
Germany 2011
Korea (Rep.) 2011
Singapore 2011
USA 2011
Switzerland 2008
Sweden 2011
Finland 2011
-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
GERD per capita in current PPP$
Namibia 2010
China 2011
South Africa 2010
Korea (Rep.) 2011
Japan 2011
France 2011
UK 2011
Finland 2011
Germany 2011
Sweden 2011
Canada 2011
USA 2011
Switzerland 2008
Singapore 2011
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000
GDP per capita in current PPP$
48
PPP$: adjusted to purchasing power
Das Wissenschaftssystem in Deutschland, Dr. Jörg SchneiderBonn, März 2015
Gross expenditure on R&D (GERD) in selected countries
49
Namibia 2010
South Africa 2010
Singapore 2012
Finland 2012
Switzerland 2008
Sweden 2012
Canada 2012
UK 2012
France 2012
Korea 2011
Germany 2012
Japan 2011
China 2012
United States 2012
0 200000000 400000000
Lesotho 2011
Cabo Verde 2011
Congo 2009
Gambia 2011
Burundi 2011
Togo 2010
Namibia 2010
Madagascar 2011
Burkina Faso 2009
Mauritius 2005
Zambia 2008
Mozambique 2010
Mali 2010
Botswana 2005
Gabon 2009
Senegal 2010
Ghana 2010
Sudan 2010
Ethiopia 2010
Uganda 2010
Tanzania 2010
Nigeria 2007
Kenya 2010
South Africa 2010
0 1000000 2000000 3000000 4000000Datenquelle: http://data.uis.unesco.org, Dataset: Science, technology and innovation. Indicator GERD in '000 current PPP$.
Thank you very much
for your attention
Dr. Joerg SchneiderHead of International DivisionDeutsche [email protected]
50