escapement goals? we don’t need no stinking ‘scapement goals! hal michael washington department...

16
ESCAPEMENT GOALS? WE DON’T NEED NO STINKING ‘SCAPEMENT GOALS! Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 360-902-2659 [email protected]

Upload: mandy-shaw

Post on 14-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

ESCAPEMENT GOALS? WE DON’T NEED NO STINKING

‘SCAPEMENT GOALS!

Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

[email protected]

AN ESCAPEMENT GOAL

Spawners

Catch

Adults

The Burning Question

• What information do we have available to use to set an escapement goal for steelhead if current models give results that are constrained by the fishery previously imposed on the stock?

This report is available free from WA DNR

Steelhead Parr per metre in Treatment and Control Habitats

0

20

40

60

80

100

Controls Structures Nutrients Structures& Nutrients

nu

mb

er p

er m

etre

Greatest effect came from combined treatment of structures and nutrient enrichment. It is essentially additive.

Effect of nutrient addition on Keogh steelhead smolt ages

0%20%40%

60%80%

100%age 4

age 3

age 2

age 1

KEOGH RIVER

• Approximately 259,000 sq m surface area• Loaded with equivalent of 64,260 kg

carcasses, in addition to 50,000 pinks every other year

• Approx biomass loading of 0.63 kg/ sq m• Soos Cr, a Green R. trib, has 249,000 sq m

(96% of Keogh)• Skagit R has 21,129,900 sq m (81.6 times

larger than Keogh)

SOOS CREEK I

• Small stream, tributary to Green River with a hatchery and rack near mouth

• For 1981-2002, Chinook and coho passed upstream have averaged 0.14 kg per square metre; maximum in 2000 of 0.63

SOOS CREEK STEELHEAD IISH esc-3 yr shift

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.090 0.100Flow adjusted coho spawner biomass density

Ste

elh

ead

sp

awn

ers

SH esc-3 yr shift

SOOS CREEK STEELHEAD IIIREMOVE LOW FLOW YEARS

SH esc-3 yr shift

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.090 0.100Flow adjusted coho spawner biomass density

Ste

elh

ead

sp

awn

ers

SH esc-3 yr shift

SKAGIT RIVER

• Surface area of streams accessible to coho is 81.6 times as large as Keogh River.

• If Keogh averages 50,000 pink, a simple expansion gives 4,080,000 pinks for the Skagit

• Current goal for Skagit pink is 330,000

• Snow CreekSalmon Creek Coho Salmon

Mean FL Survival Mean FL Survival

to return to return• 1977 99 7.9% 102 20.0%• 1978 101.3 9.11% 102.1 12.1%

• Steelhead trout • 1977 158.0 172.0• 1978 164.4 165.1

• Chum salmon escapement biomassBiomass Biomass

• 1976 0.037 0.217• 1977 0.014 0.122• 1978 0.037 0.362• 1979 0.003 0.069• 1980 0.012 0.464

UPSHOT• Nutrients, as delivered by spawning

salmon, are critical• Quality habitat, including appropriate

flows, access to stream reaches, habitat complexity, are equally critical

STEELHEAD ESCAPEMENT GOAL• Harvest rate on wild stock no more than 10% in

total.• Coho escapement target of at least 0.15 kg per

square metre• Pink escapement goal of at least 0.63 kg per

square metre• Chum escapement goal of 0.5 kg/square metre• Fall Chinook escapement goal of 0.63 kg per

square metre to match pinks• Spring Chinook goal of 0.15 kg per square metre to

match coho

SOOS CREEK ESCAPMENT GOAL

• For Chinook (7.97 kg) and chum (4 kg), target only the mainstem of Big Soos Cr, 104,479 square metres

• For coho (2.27 kg) use entire basin, 249,057 square metres

• Chinook=8,250• Chum=16,450• Coho=16,450