errata: thirteenth critical bibliography of the history and philosophy of science and of the history...
TRANSCRIPT
Errata: Thirteenth Critical Bibliography of the History and Philosophy of Science and of theHistory of Civilization. (To October 1922)Source: Isis, Vol. 6, No. 1 (1924), p. 132Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/223999 .
Accessed: 15/06/2014 15:44
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,preserve and extend access to Isis.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 15:44:44 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ERRATA
(For previous errata, see Vol. V, 569.)
Vol. V, p. 14, 1. 10 from bottom read < thought ?.
p. 14,1. 2 from bottom read X senses >.
p. 136, 1. 6 from bottom read < Containing a bibliography in the order of publication, fairly complete but, in my
opinion, confusing >.
p. 213, second note read Romanic Review.
p. 210 1. 7 of note on HOLMYARD, read X matter. He ?.
A few other misprints are not mentioned in these errata, because
they are too obvious to cause any error or confusion. I wish to
express my thankfulness to the readers who take the trouble to make the above-mentioned corrections in their set of Isis. I would advise them, after having accomplished that little task, to write their initials near mine at the bottom of this note, thus to indicate that these and the previous errata have been taken into account.
G. S.
ERRATA
(For previous errata, see Vol. V, 569.)
Vol. V, p. 14, 1. 10 from bottom read < thought ?.
p. 14,1. 2 from bottom read X senses >.
p. 136, 1. 6 from bottom read < Containing a bibliography in the order of publication, fairly complete but, in my
opinion, confusing >.
p. 213, second note read Romanic Review.
p. 210 1. 7 of note on HOLMYARD, read X matter. He ?.
A few other misprints are not mentioned in these errata, because
they are too obvious to cause any error or confusion. I wish to
express my thankfulness to the readers who take the trouble to make the above-mentioned corrections in their set of Isis. I would advise them, after having accomplished that little task, to write their initials near mine at the bottom of this note, thus to indicate that these and the previous errata have been taken into account.
G. S.
ERRATA
(For previous errata, see Vol. V, 569.)
Vol. V, p. 14, 1. 10 from bottom read < thought ?.
p. 14,1. 2 from bottom read X senses >.
p. 136, 1. 6 from bottom read < Containing a bibliography in the order of publication, fairly complete but, in my
opinion, confusing >.
p. 213, second note read Romanic Review.
p. 210 1. 7 of note on HOLMYARD, read X matter. He ?.
A few other misprints are not mentioned in these errata, because
they are too obvious to cause any error or confusion. I wish to
express my thankfulness to the readers who take the trouble to make the above-mentioned corrections in their set of Isis. I would advise them, after having accomplished that little task, to write their initials near mine at the bottom of this note, thus to indicate that these and the previous errata have been taken into account.
G. S.
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 15:44:44 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions