#epicfail! a/b test results vs. ux best practices (boston upa 2012)

43
#EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices Susan Rice & Kirk Doggett Global UX Center of Excellence UPA Boston Conference 1 9/12/2013

Upload: susan-rice

Post on 02-Jul-2015

609 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

#EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

#EpicFail!

A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices

Susan Rice & Kirk Doggett

Global UX Center of Excellence

UPA Boston Conference 19/12/2013

Page 2: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Overview

• Introduction

• Examples– Pop Up Windows

– Progress Indicators

– Homepages

– Buttons

– Website Purchase Flow

– People Don‘t Read

• Summary

• Questions?

UPA Boston Conference 29/12/2013

Page 3: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Who We Are

Vistaprint provides high-impact personalized products and electronic services that empower micro businesses and consumers at an affordable price.

Company Facts

• 25 localized websites

• 3,700 employees

• 3 state of art manufacturing facilities

• 13 offices worldwide

UPA Boston Conference 39/12/2013

Page 4: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

―Test Before You Invest‖

We have dozens of multivariate ―split run‖ site tests live at any given time during our 3 week release cycles.

• Scalable: Most site changes are measured before rollout

• Low Risk: Multiple tests can be run simultaneously with a sample of the population

• Accurate: Test sample is representative of user base

4

Random

Sample

Price Control

Price Test

UIControl 5% 5%

UITest 5% 5%

User

Population

UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 5: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

UX & A/B Testing

• UX designs the UI and

helps inform the test plan.

• Test runs and is analyzed.

• Layer the quantitative with

the qualitative to create a

holistic picture to inform

future design decisions.

UPA Boston Conference 5

But what happens when A/B testing results challenge tried

and true usability principles and best practices?

9/12/2013

Page 6: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

POP UP WINDOWS

6UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 7: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• Avoid popup windows: [1]

– Extra windows keep users from getting to your site content, and even if such windows contain valuable information, users are likely to dismiss them immediately as ads.

– The other drawback to popup windows is that they go away — once the user gets rid of them, they're gone, so users often can't find the information again even if they want to.

• Do not have unsolicited windows or graphics ―pop up‖ to users.[2]

– Users have commented that unsolicited windows or graphics that ‗pop up‘ are annoying and distracting when they are focusing on completing their original activity.

• Selective attention is very powerful, and Web users have learned to stop paying attention to any ads that get in the way of their goal-driven navigation. [3]

– “pop-up purges mean that users close pop-up windoids before they have even fully rendered; sometimes with great viciousness‖

[1] Jakob Nielsen, excerpt from 113 Design Guidelines for Homepage Usability, 2001[2] US Government, Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, 2006[3] Jakob Nielsen, Top 10 Mistakes in Web Design, updated 2011

7UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 8: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• You’re going to lose my business if your web site experience is annoying.

• According to preliminary information from the survey… major peeves about commercial Web sites were: [1]

– Pop-up advertising (34.9 percent)

– Registration log-on pages (16.7 percent)

– Software installation (15.7 percent)

– Slow-loading pages (9.1 percent)

[1] John P. Mello Jr. http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/44966.html, July, 2005

8UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 9: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

In 2007 we added a pop-up…

Control Test

UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013 9

Page 10: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Results of adding the pop-up

• Significant increase in conversion rate across

most countries and across most products, from

5% to 11%.

• More business cards were created

Most Popular

Most Popular

Beauty/Massage/Spa

Beauty/Massage/Spa

Construction & Trade

Construction & Trade

Flowers & Candles

Flowers & Candles

Music & Entertainment

Music & Entertainment

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

3700 3701

Sum of Documents Created

Feature Value Id

Category Name

Control ExperimentTested in August, 2007

10UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 11: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Today:

In 2008, Nielsen declares the lightbox as the interaction design technique of the year [1]

[1] Jakob Nielsen, 10 Best Application UIs, Alertbox, 8/12/2008

UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013 11

Page 12: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

PROGRESS INDICATORS

12UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 13: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• Show the steps of the process [1]

– Recommended for checkout

• Guideline: Provide feedback to let users know where they are in the Web site. [2]

– Feedback provides users with the information they need to understand where they are within the Web site, and for proceeding to the next activity.

• In this example, note the right-pointing arrows. Nielsen discusses his changeover from colons to arrows. The rationale for the arrows instead of colons or other indicators was because ―the arrows seem to be slightly easier to understand as an indication of moving deeper and deeper into the site.‖ [3]

[1] Nielsen Norman Group, E-Commerce User Experience, Vol. 4: Shopping Cart, Checkout and Registration, 2011[2] US Government, Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, 2006[3] Beth A. Martin, Breadcrumb Navigation, November 2006

13UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 14: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

We tried removing the progress indicator

• Removing progress bar from Options improves

conversion

Test

ControlResults:• We observed a

significant increase of +0.47% of the conversion rate overall.

• The test significantly increased the number of sessions that make it to the Cart.

14UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 15: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

We tried adding a progress indicator…

• Adding a progress bar to the design pages hurts

conversion:

15

Test condition sessions CR CR Change

Control 50175 7.33%

Display Nav 49362 7.06% -3.69%

UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 16: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Progress Bar visual design…

Control

Test

Visual redesign hurts conversion.

Results:• CR is down 0.9% for

New Customers

16UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 17: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

HOMEPAGES

17UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 18: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• “Clearly designate one page per site as the official

homepage.” [1]

• For a decade, one of the primary homepage usability

guidelines has been to designate a single page as the

one and only official homepage for any given website.

Users are confused when several pages are referred to

as ―home.‖ [2]

• [3]

[1] Jakob Nielsen, 113 Design Guidelines for Homepage Usability, 2001[2] Jakob Nielsen, Overloaded vs. Generic Commands, 12/19/2011[3] US Government, Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, 2006

18UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 19: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Two Home pages?

• It worked for HomeRuns in 2001:

19

First Time Home Returning Home

UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 20: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

A decade later…

• For returning customers, conversion rate is significantly higher for the Returning Home page than from the First Time Visitor home page.

First Time Home Returning Home

20UPA Boston Conference9/12/2013

Page 21: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

BUTTONS

UPA Boston Conference 219/12/2013

Page 22: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• ―Ensure that a pushbutton‘s label clearly indicates its

action.‖ [1]

• ―The text on the button should begin with a verb. [2]

• ―Trigger words are the words and phrases that trigger a

user into clicking. They contain the essential elements

to provide the motivation to continue with the site.‖ [3]

• Fitts’s Law: ―The time required to move to a target is a

function of target size and distance to the target.‖ [4]

UPA Boston Conference 22

[1] US Government, Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, 2006[2] UX Booth, Good Call-to-Action Buttons, 2009[3] Jared Spool, The Right Trigger Words, 2004[4] Universal Principles of Design, Revised and Updated: 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Teach through Design, 2010

9/12/2013

Page 23: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

E-Commerce Examples

Staples

Amazon

UPA Boston Conference 239/12/2013

Page 24: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Cart Buttons

UPA Boston Conference 24

Significant decrease in CTR to ShippingSignificant increase of CTR to Shipping

Control

Test 1 Test 2

• We tested larger target areas with improved visual

hierarchy and verbs with security info like Staples.

Increased cognitive friction?

9/12/2013

Page 25: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

E-Commerce Examples

Amazon

UPA Boston Conference 259/12/2013

Page 26: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Checkout Buttons

UPA Boston Conference 26

Could simpler buttons actually decrease cognitive load and prevent overthinking?

• We tested distinctive trigger words on our checkout

buttons and similar language to Amazon.

CR decreased significantly in FRCTR decreased significantly from shipping to confirmation in top 5 locales

Shut off after 9 days in testing

Control Test 1

9/12/2013

Page 27: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Product Page Buttons

• We tested rollover states, more prominent call-to-actions

and larger targets.

UPA Boston Conference 27

Control Test 1

Significant increase in CR of 1.5% was seen.

Law of diminishing returns?

Test 2

Test 2: No impact.

9/12/2013

Page 28: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

WEBSITE PURCHASE FLOW

UPA Boston Conference 289/12/2013

Page 29: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• Offer ―sufficient information about your products to answer users‘ pre-purchase questions.‖ [1]

• ―Helping customers see what they want, when they want it, and in the way they want to see it, is substantially preferable to forcing them through a hub-and-spoke, back-and-forth path.‖ [2]

• ―The number of clicks isn't what is important to users, but whether or not they're successful at finding what they're seeking.‖ [3]

And internally we‘ve learned…

• When a customer becomes invested in one of our designs, the more likely they‘ll convert.

• Multiple screens/clicks are OK if customers know they‘re making progress.

UPA Boston Conference 29

[1] NN/g, E-Commerce User Experience[2] Bryan Eisenberg et. al., Call to Action: Secret Formulas to Improve Online Results, 2005[3] Jared Spool, Testing the Three-Click Rule, 2003

9/12/2013

Page 30: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Design / Flow

UPA Boston Conference 30

Get started Choose Design Template

9/12/2013

Page 31: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Design / Flow

UPA Boston Conference 31

PreviewTemplate

Personalize! Checkout Process

9/12/2013

Page 32: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

That seems to work well. But what if…?

UPA Boston Conference 32

Significant increases to Website CR for new customers. • DTI CR increased 9.58%• Acquisition campaigns increased 5.18% Less friction?

9/12/2013

Page 33: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

PEOPLE DON’T READ

UPA Boston Conference 339/12/2013

Page 34: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Good ol‘ Gary Larson…

UPA Boston Conference 349/12/2013

Page 35: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

What the experts say…

• ―We've known since our first studies of how users read on the

Web that they typically don't read very much.‖ [1]

• ―Satisficing describes the situation where people settle with a

solution to a problem that is "good enough".‖ [2]

• “Users don‘t make optimal choices…Neither do they scan

web-page in a linear fashion, going sequentially from one site

section to another one.‖ [3]

UPA Boston Conference 35

[1] Jakob Nielsen, How Little Do Users Read?, 2008[2] Interaction-Design.org, Satisficing, 2004[3] Smashing Magazine, 10 Principles of Effective Web Design, 2008

9/12/2013

Page 36: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Product Page

UPA Boston Conference 36

Control

Test 2Significant increase in paper stock upgrades

9/12/2013

Relevant copy is helpful for decision making.

Page 37: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

More Product Page Testing

UPA Boston Conference 37

Control Test

Marginal increase in GM/order

Significant shift in take rate of 100 lb. premium and recycled paper and a decrease in Matte and Glossy.

So copy is making a difference…

9/12/2013

Page 38: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Sign In Button

UPA Boston Conference 38

Significantly hurt overall CR by 1.25%

Sign in page exit rate increased significantly.

Shut off after 7 days of testing

Control

Test

Even changing 2 letters can have an impact.

9/12/2013

Page 39: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Summary

• Best practices are a great starting point but they‘re

general.

• A/B testing can help you zero-in on specific changes

that can help you make changes that benefit your

site and your customers.

• Context and relevancy matters.

• Even small changes can make a significant

difference in site performance.

• Nothing is straightforward and simple.

UPA Boston Conference 399/12/2013

Page 40: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Summary

• There‘s a healthy tension between Standardization

and Innovation.

• This isn‘t the end state. We‘ll continue to optimize

and learn from our customers.

• It‘s all about balance… and learning more about

your customers through various avenues…

• What the experts say: It depends… [1]

UPA Boston Conference 40

[1] Jared Spool, User Interface Engineering

9/12/2013

Page 41: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Summary

• Consistency is one of the most powerful usability

principles…

• A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little

minds…

- Ralph Waldo Emerson

• A/B testing helps us learn when context is more

important than consistency.

UPA Boston Conference 419/12/2013

Page 42: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

QUESTIONS?

UPA Boston Conference 429/12/2013

Page 43: #EpicFail! A/B Test Results vs. UX Best Practices (Boston UPA 2012)

Thanks!

Special thanks to Dave Yuknat for his fantastic editing

expertise… and for gathering supporting examples for the

presentation.

Susan Rice leads global UX design and

Kirk Doggett leads global UX research at Vistaprint.

And just a plug… we’re hiring!

UPA Boston Conference 439/12/2013