engagement levels in astronomy communication

24
Engagement Levels in Astronomy Communication Engagement of Non-scientists with Astronomy Pedro Russo Jos van den Broek @pruss [email protected]

Upload: unawe

Post on 15-May-2015

721 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at CAP2013, Warsaw, Poland Engagement of Non-scientists with Astronomy By Pedro Russo (EU-UNAWE International Project Manager)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Engagement Levels in Astronomy CommunicationEngagement of Non-scientists with Astronomy

Pedro RussoJos van den Broek@pruss [email protected]

Page 2: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication
Page 3: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication
Page 4: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Type of Activities & Products

Morrow 2000, Christensen 2007

A: Curriculum-driven

B: Educational programmes

C: Museum exhibits , star parties, …

D: Planetariums shows, IMAX movies, public talks, ....

E: TV/radio documentaries, podcasts, magazine articles

F & G: Press releases, press conferences, press kits, Video News Releases, media interviews, media courses for scientists …

H: Exhibition booths, annual reports

I: Merchandise

Page 5: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Motivation

• Criticism of the IYA2009 impact numbers.

• How engaged are non-astronomers with astronomy EPO activities?

• How can we better plan our activities based on specific goals?

Page 6: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Public Engagement with Science

• developing interest in science,• understanding scientific knowledge,• connecting with scientific reasoning,• reflecting on science, • practice science,• identifying with the scientific enterprise.

US National Research Council, 2009

Page 7: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Informal Contact

Page 8: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Informal Contact

Page 9: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Passive Participation

Page 10: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Passive Participation

Page 11: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Active Participation

Page 12: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Active Participation

Page 13: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication
Page 14: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Active Participation

Eurobarometer 340, 2010

Page 15: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Participation as Data Collectors and Analysts

Page 16: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Participation as Data Collectors and Analysts

Page 17: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Amateur Researcher

Page 18: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Amateur Researcher

Page 19: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Amateur Researcher

Page 20: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

A B C D E

Engagement Levels

Developing Understanding Connect Practice Identifying

InformalContact

Passive Participation

ActiveParticipation

Collectors& Analysts

AmateurResearchers

Page 21: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

International Year of Astronomy 2009

1%

24%

27%

48%

Informal ContactPassive ParticipationActive ParticipationCollectors & Analysts

Data: http://goo.gl/gAAQIf

Page 22: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Appropriate metrics of evaluation lag [behind] the emergence of new scholarly forms of authoring, publishing, and researching.

Traditional approaches to scholarly evaluation such as citation-based metrics, for example, are often hard to apply to research that is disseminated or conducted via social media.

in NMC Horizon Project Preview, 2013 Higher Education Edition

Discussion

Page 23: Engagement  Levels in  Astronomy  Communication

Discussion

One of the reasons appointed by researchers for not participating in EPO is the lack of recognition of their EPO initiatives for their career development.

EPOindex to measure the effectiveness of EPO activities implemented by researchers :

• Number of hours spent developing and implementing EPO activities• Number of people engaged with activities• Engagement Levels