egret printing and publishing company ppt
DESCRIPTION
MAB Second semester students . Global College International affiliation with Shinawatra University. Financial case study submitted to Prof.Dr. Radhe Shyam Pardhan.TRANSCRIPT
Egret Printing and Publishing company
A case study.
PRESENTERS:
NISHAN RAJBHANDARI
SIDDHARTHA CHHETRI
SUDHIR BOGATI
SUPRAVA SHARMA
SUJATA PATHAK
# Egret Printing and Publishing Company is a family owned specialty printing business Found by Keith
Belford in 1986.
# Hill has responsibility for the both internal and external financial operations.
# Belford’s have identified four major capital investment proposals as potential candidates for funding
in the coming year.
# All equity capital structure to be overly conservative
# Belford family not willing to go for debt financing.
Background of the study
Project A: Major Plant Expansion
Project B: Alternative Plan For Plant Expansion
Project C: Purchase Of New Press
Project D: Upgrade Of Egret’s Video Text Service
Four Major Capital Investment Proposals
Pay Back Period(In thousand US dollar)
Project A Project B Project C Project D Remarks
Project Cost 1000 1000 2000 1000
Discount rate (15%)
3.787 years 2.014 years 4.446 years 3 years Accept B and D
Discount rate (21%)
4.826 years 2.582 years 5.274 years 4.822 years Accept B and D
Life of project
4 years 4 years 10 years 5 years
Capital budget $3.0 million
Project A and B mutually exclusive
Net present Value
Project A Project B Project C Project D Remarks
Cost of project 1000 1000 2000 1000
Net Present value (15%) 197.35
186.8
1262.22
173.27
Accept A and C
Net Present Value (21%) 49.12 93.87 635.165 24.1 Accept B and C
Life of project 4 years 4 years 10 years 5 years
IRR Project A Project B Project C Project D Remarks
Cost of project 1000 1000 2000 1000
Internal rate of return (IRR) 23.30% 28.49% 30.18% 22.11% Select B and C
Life of project 5 years 5 years 10 years 6 years
The company should use NPV method instead of payback period method and IRR method. It takes into account all cash flows. All cash flows are discounted at the appropriate market-determined opportunity cost of capital. NPV of a project is exactly the same as the increase in shareholders’ wealth.A zero NPV is one, which earns a fair return to compensate both debt holders & equity holders.A positive NPV project earns more than the required rate of return, & equity holders receive all excess cash flows.
SUGGESTION TO COMPANY
EAA Project A Project B Project C Project D Remarks
Cost of project 1000 1000 2000 1000
Equivalent annual annuity (15%)
69.12 65.43 251.50 51.69 Select A and C
Equivalent annual annuity (21%)
19.34 36.95 156.67 8.24 Select B and C
Life of project 4 years 4 years 10 years 5 years
Cash Flow with 380000$
Project D Before change in cash flow
After change in cash flow Remarks
15% 21% 15% 21%
Payback period 4 years 4.822 year 3.61 years 4.237 years Improve in PBP
Net Present value
173.27
24.1 273.836
111.88 Improve in NPV
EAA 51.69 8.24 81.69 38.24 Improve in EAA
Internal rate of return
21.11% 26.07% Improve in EAA
particular Project A(industry average)
Project B Remarks
Payback period(PBP) 3.425 year 2.014 year Project B (good)
Net present value(NPV) 197.35 186.8 Project A (good)
Internal rate of return(IRR) 23.30 28.49 Project B (good)
Comparison of Project B with Project A( industry average)
-Approximately 3 mill ion available for investment
-With this amount company will only be able to invest in ei ther project A and C or projects B and C.
-Without using debt f inancing company is losing the opportunity to invest in project D.
-1 mill ion as long term debt.
-All projects are posit ive i t would be highly profi table for the company.
-Debt financing capital reducing i t from 15% to 12% only.
-Project D will also profi table if belford brothers invest from debt financing.
If cash flows project D = $380000
Payback period Net present value IRR EAA
15% 3.61 years $273.836 26.07 $81.69
21% 4.237 years $111.88 26.07 $38.24
Project D has a positive NPV hence, shows a good profitability. It has low return compared to that of project C.In the situation , Belford brothers acquire the loan of 1 million , project D is advisible
Effect on capital structure and COC - debt
Source of capital Amount Weight After tax cost of capital
Product
Long term debt 1 M 0.25 7.2 1.8
Common equity 3M 0.75 15 11.25
Total 4 M Weighted average cost of capital 13.05 %
Comparison before debt and after debtCOST OF CAPITAL
NET PRESENT VALUES OF PROJECT
A B C D
15% 197.35
186.8
1262.22
173.27
21% 49.12 93.87 635.165 24.1
13.5% 252.625
220.32
1523 228.5
Time interest earned RatioEBIT $6120000
Less: Interest(12%) $120000
EBT $6000000
Less: tax @40% $2400000
EAT $3600000
Less : dividends $600000
Retained Earnings $3000000
Times interested earned ratio = EBIT/ Interest
= 6120000/120000= 51 times
Handling of project C valid? Project C is best according to the NPV analysis
Based on the NPV analysis we came to know :
project with higher NPV is better
In case of independent project, having Higher positive NPV project should be selected
In case of mutually exclusive, project with highest NPV is selected.
Profitability index of A&C and B&C ranked first and second respectively
Project C handled in the case earlier is valid because project C cannot be chosen without choosing either Projects A or B.
Quantitative Vs Qualitative Factors
Quantitative factors can only be measured in numeric terms. Whereas, Qualitative measures is judgment based. It involves:•Some preliminary quantitative analysis and judgments.•It plays an important role in the overall capital budgeting.•It is used in project evaluation.Not the only factor is effective for evaluation. So, both the factors are required for the capital budgeting evaluation.
Lesion learntDebt fi nancing is important for any company.
A positive NPV is a best criteria.
Profi tability index helps in deciding the combinations of projects to be undertaken.
Have ultimate authority over investment decisions equity holders
Thank You