effects of soil compaction on n2o emission in agricultural soil
TRANSCRIPT
E�ects of soil compaction on N2O emission in agricultural soil
B.K. Sitaula a,*, S. Hansen b, J.I.B. Sitaula c, L.R. Bakken a
a Department of Soil and Water Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Box 5028, N-1432, �As, Norwayb Norwegian Centre for Ecological Agriculture, N-6630, Tingvoll, Norway
c Department of Biotechnological Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Box 5040, N-1432, �As, Norway
Received 2 March 2000; accepted 23 May 2000
Importance of this paper: Agricultural soil is an important source of atmospheric N2O. Soil compaction created by
tractor tra�c is favourable for N2O production in soil due to its e�ect on soil aeration. The high input of mineral nitrogen (a
common practice of conventional agricultural) to the compacted soil would emit N2O emission more vigorously. In this
paper, we have presented the result of four year long ®eld research investigating the e�ect of soil compaction on N2Oemission in relation to factors of potential explanatory importance. Since agricultural modernisation (with increased
tractor tra�c) is taking place world-wide, such investigation will have important implications for the global N2O budget.
This paper may also provide a scienti®c basis for encouraging ecological agriculture that causes the least soil compaction.
Abstract
We have studied the e�ect of soil compaction on N2O ¯uxes in relation to gas di�usion and N fertilization in the
®eld, and N2O release rates in laboratory incubated soil samples. The fertilization and soil compaction ®eld experiment
was established in 1985, and the gas ¯uxes were measured in the period from 1992 to 1994. N2O emission was higher in
compacted than in uncompacted soil. This compaction e�ect was four times higher in the NPK-fertilized treatment
compared to the unfertilized one. Soil compaction decreased gas di�usivity and this may have contributed for increased
N2O emission. This increased N2O emission due to soil compaction in the ®eld became non-signi®cant after the
compacted soil was sieved (2-mm mesh) and N2O emission rates were measured in laboratory incubations. The sieving
presumably removed di�usion barriers and increased the oxygen supply compared with that under the soil compaction
in ®eld. This reversibility of ®eld compaction e�ects indicates that the soil compaction does not permanently increase
the biological potential for N2O production in the soil. Ó 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Compaction; Di�usivity; Nitrogen fertilizer; Nitrous oxide
1. Introduction
Soil compaction by tractor tra�c is a widespread
problem in modern agriculture (H�akansson et al., 1988;
Hansen, 1996). In Western Norway, large areas of soil
are easily compacted, partly because of the humid cli-
mate, and partly because of ®ne soil texture and high
organic material content (Hansen et al., 1993). The
possible e�ects of soil compaction are decrease in gas
di�usivity (Ball et al., 1999), modi®cation of soil mi-
crohabitats (occurrence of higher percentage of small
pores) and increased probability of anaerobic conditions
(Hansen et al., 1993). These conditions, created by soil
compaction, are favourable for N2O production from
both nitri®cation and denitri®cation (Rosswall et al.,
1989). Little work has been reported on the e�ect of soil
compaction on N2O emission at the process level. In-
creased denitri®cation, N2O emission and decreased soil
NOÿ3 , due to soil compaction, has been reported earlier
Chemosphere ± Global Change Science 2 (2000) 367±371
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +47-64-94-82-12; fax: +47-64-
94-82-11.
E-mail address: [email protected] (B.K. Sitaula).
1465-9972/00/$ - see front matter Ó 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 1 4 6 5 - 9 9 7 2 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 4 0 - 4
(Bakken et al., 1987; Maidl and Fischbeck, 1987; Han-
sen et al., 1993). However, to our knowledge, there are
very few works on e�ects of compaction on N2O emis-
sion (e.g., Ball et al., 1999), and no work is on its
residual e�ects once the physical e�ects of compaction
are eliminated.
It has previously been shown, many times, that the
N2O emission in soils is increased by nitrogen input, due
to increased supply of substrate for both nitri®cation
and denitri®cation (Eichner, 1990; Mosier et al., 1991;
Hansen et al., 1993; Sitaula et al., 1995). Therefore, both
compaction and N fertilization are favourable for N2O
production in soil. The combined e�ects of these two
factors (compaction and N fertilization) are of great
interest since these two factors are superimposed, si-
multaneously, on the agricultural soil. We hypothesised
that this combination would increase N2O production
rates higher than the production modulated by a single
factor. We have investigated this by measuring N2O
emission rates in compacted and uncompacted soil,
under-unfertilized and NPK-fertilized treatments, for
four years (1991±1994). We also measured the soil
compaction e�ects on gas di�usivities in the ®eld.
The repeated soil compaction for long period may
have other long lasting e�ects (modi®cation of biological
potentials) in addition to the physical e�ects. The re-
peated soil compaction might a�ect the biological po-
tentials, as has been observed for reduced methane
oxidation potentials in the same experimental site (Si-
taula et al., 2000). We investigated this other e�ect of
compaction for N2O emission as well, by measuring
N2O production rates after eliminating the physical ef-
fect created by the soil compaction. If the increased N2O
emission by soil compaction could be found to be a re-
sult of physical e�ects (restricted di�usion) only, this
anthropogenic increase of N2O emission (due to soil
compaction) might be decreased by minimising soil
compaction.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Site description
N2O ¯uxes were measured in a ®eld experiment in
Surnadal, Norway for four years (1991±1994). More
detail on the ®eld site is given by Hansen et al. (1993). In
brief, the soil is a typic udorthents (USDA system of soil
classi®cation) developed on ¯uvial deposits. In 1991, the
crop grown was green fodder (Hansen et al., 1993). In
1992, the ®eld was ploughed and the crop was grown
(barley with ley under-sown). The ley consisted of tim-
othy (Phleum pratense) and clover (Trifolium pratense,
T. repens and T. hybridum) and remained throughout the
rest of the experimental period.
2.2. Experimental design
The experiment had a split-plot factorial design with
two replicates, soil compaction on main plots and fer-
tilization on small plots (2.8 m ´ 8 m, two sample areas
2 m ´ 1 m at each plot with 5.5 m between). For each ¯ux
measurement, soil cover chambers were placed ran-
domly within each sampling plot.
Soil compaction treatment comprised one pass of a
four ton tractor, wheel by wheel, each spring, and two
passes after each harvest. The rear wheels were double-
settings with a total tyre width of 140 cm (in¯ation
pressure of 57 kPa). In front, there were low-pressure
tyres with a total width of 100 cm.
The fertilization treatment consists of NPK (mineral-
fertilizer) and a UNF (unfertilized) treatment. The four
years of NPK fertilization was done with NPK mineral-
fertilizer containing 18% N as NH4NO3: The N appli-
cation rates were; in 1991:140 kg N haÿ1, in 1992:83 kg
N haÿ1, in 1993:120 kg N haÿ1 divided into two appli-
cations (70 + 50 kg N) and in 1994:211 kg N haÿ1 divided
in two applications (123 + 88 kg N).
2.3. Field measurements
In 1991, N20 ¯uxes were measured shortly after snow
melt (23, 24 and 26 April), before and after ploughing
(4 and 7 June) and 12 times after compaction and fer-
tilization treatments in June and July). In 1992, we
started measuring gas ¯uxes shortly after the snow melt
(18 May) and continued until 26 June. Ten measure-
ments were taken during this period. Similarly, nine
measurements were made in 1993. In 1994, four mea-
surements were made.
Gas ¯uxes were measured by soil cover chambers as
described by Hansen et al. (1993). For each combination
of fertilization and compaction treatments, there were
four parallel ¯ux measurements taken on each day of
measurement. All gas samples were analysed by gas
chromatography within seven days of sampling (Sitaula
et al., 1992).
In situ di�usivity was measured using the method of
Ball et al. (1994) but modi®ed to use freon-22 as dif-
fusing gas instead of krypton-85, as described in Ball
et al. (1997). Two measurements were taken only once,
in June 1993, in both compacted and uncompacted plots
(Fig. 2).
The volumetric moisture content of the top 20 cm of
the soil layer, was measured on each gas sampling date
using the TRIME-system digital moisture meter (IMKO
GmbH, Ettingen, Germany) connected to time-domain-
re¯ectrometry (TDR) probes.
In 1993 and 1994, the NH�4 and NOÿ3 content of soil
(0±20 cm) was determined in a composite soil sample for
each treatment collected with a soil auger. The soil
samples were taken on each date of gas measurement,
368 B.K. Sitaula et al. / Chemosphere ± Global Change Science 2 (2000) 367±371
close to the spots (5±10 cm away), where each gas ¯ux
measurement was done. The gravimetric soil moisture
content was determined to express NOÿ3 and NH�4content of the soil on a dry weight basis. The soil sam-
ples were analysed for NOÿ3 and NH�4 concentrations by
standard methods (20 g soil in 50 ml 2 M KCl extrac-
tions and ¯ow injection analysis by FIA-star 5010 ana-
lyser, Tecator, Sweden).
2.4. Laboratory incubation experiment
In the incubation experiments, compacted and un-
compacted soils (from both unfertilized and NPK-fer-
tilized plots) were compared. A composite sample of
approximately 1 kg was taken from compacted and
uncompacted treatments from 0±10 cm soil depth. The
compacted and uncompacted samples were mixed sep-
arately and sieved (4 mm). The soils had a moisture
content of 45% � 4% (v/v, mean � S.D.) in the ®eld and
were subjected to air drying down to 35% (v/v) (con-
trolled by frequent weighing during drying). N2O pro-
duction rates at 15°C were measured by incubating 20 g
soil sub-samples in 120 ml serum bottles capped with
butyl rubber stopper (type 20±B3P, Chromacol, Lon-
don). During the following incubation, N2O concen-
trations were measured every 12 h for three days.
2.5. Statistical analyses
The main e�ects and interactions of soil compac-
tion, fertilization and date were tested with analyses of
variance (ANOVA) and the Newman±Keul's test. The
interaction between replicate and compaction was used
as an error term to test the e�ect of compaction.
Studentised residuals were used to test the normality
of the distributions with residual plots and procedure
univariate (SAS Institute, 1988). Fluxes of N2O were
log-normally distributed, and the data were natural
log-transformed before the statistical analyses were
run.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Gas di�usion
Soil compaction decreased gas di�usivity (Fig. 1). In
situ di�usivity of freon-22 at 5±10 cm soil depth was 1.9
mm2 sÿ1 in uncompacted and 1.5 mm2 sÿ1 in compacted
soil; and at 10±18 cm soil depth 1.2 and 0.6 mm2 sÿ1,
respectively. Similarly, the air permeability was de-
creased at 5±10 cm depth by compaction (data not
shown). This decrease in gas di�usivity due to compac-
tion, is likely to restrict the oxygen supply (this agrees
with an earlier study on the same site by Hansen and
Bakken, 1993). This is not surprising, since soil com-
paction reduces the total pore volume (Breland and
Hansen, 1996), and a signi®cant reduction in the per-
centage of air ®lled pore space due to soil compaction
was observed in the same experimental site (Hansen
et al., 1993). This disturbed ``physical'' condition, with
low oxygen availability is favourable for N2O produc-
tion (Rosswall et al., 1989).
3.2. N2O emission
Soil compaction resulted in increased N2O emission
and this compaction e�ect was more pronounced in
NPK fertilization treatments (Fig. 2). In unfertilized
plots, N2O emission rate was increased by 44% due to
compaction, whereas in NPK-fertilized treatment the
average N2O emission rate was increased by 170%
(P < 0.05). This means that the e�ect of compaction on
increased N2O emission, was about four times greater in
NPK-fertilized treatment. Since soil compaction reduces
the total pore volume (Breland and Hansen, 1996), a
higher occurrence of anaerobic sites can be expected in a
compacted soil, especially with a high soil moisture
status. A high moisture content (>45% V/V) prevailed
during most of our measurement dates. These conditions
would favour a greater loss of nitrate through denitri-
®cation, more obviously in compacted soil. The average
soil NOÿ3 (mg N kgÿ1 dry soil) in NPK treatment were
22 in compacted and 24 in uncompacted soil. In UNF
treatment, average soil NOÿ3 content (mg N kgÿ1 dry
soil) were 1.5 in compacted and 1.7 in uncompacted
Fig. 1. In situ gas di�usivities (average values for each treat-
ment � S.D., n� 2) as in¯uenced by soil compaction.
B.K. Sitaula et al. / Chemosphere ± Global Change Science 2 (2000) 367±371 369
treatment. This indicated lower soil nitrate content in
compacted treatment, although di�erence was less pro-
nounced. Increased denitri®cation and decreased soil
NOÿ3 , due to soil compaction, has been reported earlier
(Bakken et al., 1987; Maidl and Fischbeck, 1987).
The rate of N2O production is regulated by the
supply of substrates (NH�4 ;NOÿ3 ) to the N2O generating
process (nitri®cation and denitri®cation). The average
soil ammonium contents (NH�4 ±N kgÿ1 dry soil) for
NPK and UNF treatments for compacted soil and un-
compacted soil were 22 and 4, 23 and 3.5, receptively.
NPK fertilization signi®cantly increased the soil NH�4content and N2O emission, as was expected due to the N
input in mineral form (NH4NO3). Despite similar NH�4content in both compacted and uncompacted treat-
ments, N2O emissions rates were higher in the com-
pacted soils. The high nitrogen input (through NPK
fertilization) to a favourable physical condition for N2O
production created by soil compaction (retarded gas
di�usion as discussed above) may have resulted in four-
times increase in N2O production rates in the combi-
nation of NPK fertilized and compacted treatment
compared to the rates in compacted and unfertilized
treatment combination. This indicates that soil com-
paction is an important factor that modulates the N
e�ects, resulting in signi®cantly higher N2O production.
Since soil compaction caused by tractor tra�c is a
widespread problem in modern agriculture, the modu-
lating e�ects of compaction on N-fertilized soil should
be taken in to account when estimating N2O emission
from agricultural soil.
3.3. Incubation experiment
The result of incubation experiment showed no sig-
ni®cant di�erence in N2O production rates between
compacted and uncompacted soils, when the physical
e�ect of ®eld compaction was minimized by sieving
(Fig. 3). The unfertilized N2O production (calculated
from Fig. 3), in the previously compacted soil
(0.15 � 0.07S:E: ng N2O±N dÿ1 gÿ1 soil dry weight,) was
not statistically di�erent from that in the uncompacted
soil (0.20 � 0.08S:E: ng N2O±N dÿ1 gÿ1 soil dry weight).
Similarly, the NPK-fertilized N2O emission rate, in the
previously compacted soil (0.25 � 0.06S:E: ng N2O±N dÿ1
Fig. 3. Time dependent increase of N2O in the headspace of
serum bottles (mean values for each treatment � S.D., n� 4)
containing sieved sub-samples.
Fig. 2. N2O emission rates (mean values for each treatment � S.E., n� 4±16 measurements) in Surnadal ®eld experiments as in¯uenced
by soil compaction.
370 B.K. Sitaula et al. / Chemosphere ± Global Change Science 2 (2000) 367±371
gÿ1 soil dry weight), was not statistically di�erent from
that in the uncompacted soil (0.30 � 0.07S:E: ng N2O±N
dÿ1 gÿ1 soil dry weight). This may indicate that the soil
compaction e�ects seen in the ®eld ¯ux data (Fig. 1), are
due to restriction of di�usion. The sieving of compacted
soil samples in the laboratory removed di�usion re-
striction arising from the compaction. Thus, increased
N2O emission, as a result of soil compaction, may be
minimised by searching and adopting suitable farm
management practices that minimize soil compaction.
Acknowledgements
The work was funded by the research council of
Norway (NFR) within the frame work of the commis-
sion of the European communities project (No. EV5V-
CT91-0052).
References
Bakken, L.R., Bùrresen, T., Njùs, A., 1987. E�ect of soil
compaction by tractor tra�c on soil structure, denitri®ca-
tion, and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of
Soil Sciences 38, 541±552.
Ball, B.C., Scott, A., Parker, J.P., 1999. Field N2O, CO2 and
CH4 ¯uxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality
in Scotland. Soil & Tillage Research 53, 29±39.
Ball, B.C., Glasbey, C.A., Robertson, E.A.G., 1994. Measure-
ment of soil gas di�usivity in situ. European Journal of Soil
Sciences 45, 3±13.
Ball, B.C., Dobbie, K.E., Parker, J.P., Smith, K.A., 1997. The
in¯uence of gas transport and porosity on methane oxida-
tion in soils. Journal of Geophysical Research 102 (D19),
23301±23308.
Breland, T.A., Hansen, S., 1996. Nitrogen mineralization and
microbial biomass as a�ected by soil compaction. Soil
Biology & Biochemistry 28, 655±663.
Eichner, M.J., 1990. Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized
soils: Summary of available data. Journal of Environmental
Quality 19, 272±280.
Hansen, S., Bakken, L.R., 1993. N2O, CO2 and O2 concentra-
tion in soil air in¯uenced by organic and inorganic fertilizers
and soil-compaction. Norwegian Journal of Agriculture
Science 7, 1±10.
Hansen, S., Mñhlum, J.E., Bakken, L.R., 1993. N2O and CH4
¯uxes in soil in¯uenced by fertilization and tractor tra�c.
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 5, 621±630.
Hansen, S., 1996. E�ects of manure treatment and soil
compaction on plant production of a dairy farm system
converting to organic farming practice. Agriculture Ecosys-
tem and Environment 56, 173±186.
H�akansson, I., Voorhees, W.B., Riley, H., 1988. Vechicle and
Wheel Factors In¯uencing Soil Compaction and Crop
Response in Di�erent Tra�c Regimes. Soil & Tillage
Research 11, 239±282.
Maidl, F.X., Fischbeck, G., 1987. Auswirkungen di�erenzierter
Bodenbearbeitung auf das Bodengef�uge und die Sticksto�-
dynamik von L�ossb�oden bei viehloser und viehstarker
Bewirtschaftung. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
159, 335±344.
Mosier, A., Schimel, D., Valentine, D., Bronson, K., Parton,
W., 1991. Methane and nitrous oxide ¯uxes in native,
fertilized and cultivated grasslands. Nature 350, 330±332.
Rosswall, T., Bak, Baldocchi, D., Cicerone, R.J., Conrad, R.,
Ehhalt, D.H., Firestone, M.K., Galbally, I.E., Galchenko,
V.F., Gro�man, P., Pappen, H., Reeburgh, W.S., Sanhueza,
E., 1989. What regulates production and consumption of
trace gases in ecosystems. In: Andreae, M.O., Schimel
D.S. (Eds.), Exchange of Trace Gases Between Terres-
trial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere. Wiley, Chichester,
pp. 73±95.
SAS Institute, 1988. SAS/Procedures Guide, Release 6.03
edition. Cary.
Sitaula, B.K., Hansen, S., Sitaula, J.I.B, Bakken, L.R., 2000.
Methane oxidation potentials and ¯uxes in agricultural soil,
e�ects of fertilization and soil compaction. Biogeochemistry
48, 323±339.
Sitaula, B.K., Bakken, L.R., Abrahamsen, G., 1995. Nitrogen
fertilization and soil acidi®cation e�ects on nitrous oxide
and carbon dioxide emission from temperate pine forest
soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 27, 1401±1408.
Sitaula, B.K., Jiafa, L., Bakken, L.R., 1992. Rapid analysis of
climate gases by wide bore capillary gas chromatography.
Journal of Environmental Quality 21, 493±496.
Bishal K. Sitaula is a senior researcher at the Department ofSoil and Water Sciences, the Agricultural University of Norway(AUN). His research covers several aspects of soil science andsoil microbiology, especially greenhouse gas ¯uxes in soil, re-search methods, and interdisciplinary research on soil degra-dation.
Sissel Hansen is a senior researcher at the Norwegian Center ofEcological Agriculture, Tingvoll. Her research is focussed uponnutrient cycling in ecological farming systems.
JIB Sitaula's research covers the microbiological aspects ofgreenhouse gas ¯uxes in soil.
Lars R. Bakken is professor at the Department of Soil andWater Sciences, AUN. His work covers several aspects of soilmicrology, trace gas ¯uxes, microbial nitrogen transformations,and modelling these processes.
B.K. Sitaula et al. / Chemosphere ± Global Change Science 2 (2000) 367±371 371