effect of municipal waste leachate on soil properties and growth and yield of rice
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [York University Libraries]On: 23 November 2014, At: 23:07Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lcss20
Effect of municipal waste leachate on soil propertiesand growth and yield of riceA. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh a & M. Kalbasi aa Department of Soil Science , College of Agriculture , Isfahan University of Technology ,Isfahan, IranPublished online: 05 Feb 2007.
To cite this article: A. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh & M. Kalbasi (2002) Effect of municipal waste leachate on soil propertiesand growth and yield of rice, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33:13-14, 2011-2020, DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120005745
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120005745
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
EFFECT OF MUNICIPAL WASTELEACHATE ON SOIL PROPERTIES AND
GROWTH AND YIELD OF RICE
A. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh* and M. Kalbasi
Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan
University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
ABSTRACT
Making use of any organic matter sources, including municipal
waste leachate (MWL) produced in process of converting solid
waste refuses into compost in arid and semi-arid regions like
central Iran, is very important. During 1998, a field experiment
was conducted to investigate the effects of MWL on soil
properties, growth, and yield of rice (Oriza sativa L.). The
treatments consisted of 0, 150, 300, and 600 t of MWL ha21 and a
control nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium–zinc (N–P–K–Zn)
fertilizer treatment in a randomized complete block design with
three replications. Rice seedlings were transferred to 4 £ 4 m
plots, which were flooded previously. Municipal waste leachate
was applied at tillering and panicle stages. At harvest, straw and
grain yield as well as concentrations of several nutrients and
heavy metals were determined in rice straw and grain. Application
of 150 and 300 t of MWL ha21 increased the straw and grain yield,
but 600 t ha21 treatment decreased the yield of grain compared to
the control fertilizer treatment. Municipal waste leachate
2011
Copyright q 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
COMMUN. SOIL SCI. PLANT ANAL., 33(13&14), 2011–2020 (2002)
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
increased the amounts of available macro- (N, P, K) and
micronutrients [iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), Zn, and copper (Cu)]
in soil, which in turn enhanced soil productivity and crop yield.
The straw and grain yields were increased from 7.0 and 4.2 t ha21
in NO MWL to 16.7 and 6.9 t ha21 in 300 t ha21 MWL treatment,
respectively. The amounts of nutrient uptake were highest in 300 t
of MWL ha21. Application of MWL significantly increased the
levels of EDTA–extractable nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr), cobalt
(Co), and lead (Pb) in the soil. Although MWL increased
concentrations of some heavy metals in rice, particular in
600 t ha21 MWL treatment, the concentrations were below the
reported critical levels for these metals. Municipal waste leachate
is rich in plant nutrients and OM and is acidic; therefore, it may be
used as a liquid fertilizer especially in calcareous soils.
INTRODUCTION
Disposal of municipal waste is a major environmental problem. Increased
urbanization and industrialization, especially in developing countries, requires
municipal authorities to handle larger amount of municipal waste than in the
past.[1,2] Considerable attention has been paid to the land application of municipal
solid waste (MSW) composts and sewage sludge worldwide in recent years.[3,4]
Land application of MWL, however, has received no attention because of its
limited production in Iran.
A large volume of leachate is produced in the process of converting solid
waste refuse into compost due to the high moisture content of municipal solid
waste in Iran. The leachate production will reach a volume of 5,000 m3 per day, if
all the municipal waste produced in the country is converted into compost.
Municipal waste leachate has been reported to affect soil physical and chemical
properties.[5,6] It promoted soil aggregation, reduced surface crusting, reduced pH
in calcareous soils, and increased soil organic matter.[5,7]
In a 2-year study, application of 320 t ha21 of an animal husbandry sewage
effluent with 2.4% dry matter increased corn yield significantly.[8] Irrigation with
a secondary sewage effluent increased the growth and yield of vegetables.[9] The
yield of plots irrigated with this effluent was as high as plots receiving N, P, and K
fertilizers.
Application of residues or refuse to soil usually increases availability of
macro- and micronutrients.[10 – 12] Alleviation of micronutrient deficiencies by
application of manure,[8] poultry refuse,[13] and sewage sludge[14] has been
reported.
KHOSHGOFTARMANESH AND KALBASI2012
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Application of refuse to soil may increase the heavy metal contents of the soil
that may allow transfer of these metals into the plant. This phenomena usually occurs
when industrial sludge is used[3,15] or when a high rate of sewage sludge is applied to
the soil. The aim of this research work was to study the effects of MWL application
on 1) rice yield, 2) accumulation of heavy metals by rice, and 3) soil properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An experiment was conducted during 1998 in the experimental field of
Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. The soil was a Typic haplargids
(Table 1). A randomized complete block design with three replications was used.
The treatments consisted of 0, 150, 300, and 600 t of MWL ha21 and a control N–
P–K–Zn fertilizer treatment with the same amount as their contents in 600 t ha21
MWL (i.e., 100 kg N ha21 as urea, 300 kg P ha21 as triple superphosphate,
400 kg K ha21 as potassium sulfate, and 40 kg Zn ha21 as zinc sulfate).
The experimental area, 21-m wide and 35-m long, was divided lengthwise
into three blocks (replications). Each block was further divided into five 4 £ 4-m
plots. Experimental plots were laterally isolated in the field by using plastic
sheets pushed into the soil to a depth of 40 cm, so that 25 cm remained above the
soil surface. Rice seedlings (4 weeks old) of cultivar Zayandehrud were
transplanted and grown in flooded plots. The standard 20 £ 20 cm spacing, which
had the same plant population, was used. Municipal waste leachate (Table 2) and
N fertilizer were applied half at tillering and half at panicle stage. All of the P–
K–Zn fertilizers were used before transplanting.
At harvest, grain and straw samples were dried at 708C and analyzed for N, P,
K, Fe, Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, Co, Cr, and Cd were determined by wet combustion[16] and
by atomic absorption spectrometry (Perkin–Elmer 3030 AA spectrometer).[17]
Before planting and after harvesting of rice, soil samples were collected from
surface (0–30 cm) and subsurface (30–60 cm) layers in each plot, air-dried, and
crushed to pass a 2-mm screen before analysis. Soil pH was measured in soil
saturation paste on a digital pH-meter. Available-P content in the soil was
determined by a colorimetric method[18] and available-K was extracted with
Table 1. Some Physical and Chemical Properties of the Soil Used
Soil Depth
(cm) Texture
pH
(Paste)
EC
(dS m21)
OM
(%)
CEC
(cmol kg21)
0–30 Silty clay 7.6 2.5 0.76 17.5
30–60 Silty clay 7.4 2.7 0.70 17.4
MUNICIPAL WASTE LEACHATE 2013
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
NH4-Ac (flame-photometer method).[17] Available Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Co, Cr,
and Cd were extracted with EDTA[18] and then determined using AAS
technique.[17] Statistical analysis was performed using SAS program.[18]
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of MWL on Soil Properties
The positive relationship of soil electrical conductivity (EC) to MWL
application for the 0–60 cm depth (Table 3) shows an excessive content of salts
in MWL. Soil EC values in plots amended with 600 t ha21 MWL, were doubled
relative to NO MWL treatment. The EC reached to levels characterized as
slightly saline that may adversely affect the growth of rice.[19] Leaching of
soluble salts contained in MWL during the rice cropping explains the low soil
salinity of the top 30-cm (Table 3).
Municipal waste leachate significantly ðP ¼ 0:05Þ decreased soil pH at both
sampling depths (Table 3). The observed decrease in the pH of the surface and
subsurface soils in MWL treatments are attributed to the acidifying effect of
MWL (Table 2).
Table 2. Chemical Composition of MWL
Parameter Unit Quantity
pH — 4.60
EC dS m21 29.00
Dry matter % 5.00
OM % 38.50
N g L21 0.06
P g L21 0.13
K g L21 2.37
Fe mg L21 62.50
Cu mg L21 3.70
Zn mg L21 18.10
Mn mg L21 5.00
Pb mg L21 1.50
Ni mg L21 0.82
Cr mg L21 0.60
Cd mg L21 ,0.01
C/N — 13.00
KHOSHGOFTARMANESH AND KALBASI2014
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Table 3. The Effects of MWL on Soil Properties
Extractable (mg kg21)
Treatment pH EC (dS m21) OM (%) N P K
0–30 cm
NO MWL 7.6a 1.5c 0.61c 32bc 22c 200c
Fertilizer 7.5a 1.6bc 0.61c 28c 25c 214c
150 MWL 7.4b 1.8b 0.85b 34b 38b 223c
300 MWL 7.3b 1.9a 0.92b 35ab 38b 266b
600 MWL 7.2c 3.0a 1.10a 52a 46a 315a
30–60 cm
NO MWL 6.9a 1.1c 0.55c 26c 20b 187c
Fertilizer 6.8a 1.2c 0.60bc 26c 20b 197c
150 MWL 6.6b 1.4bc 0.68ab 30bc 36a 202c
300 MWL 6.5b 1.9ab 0.76a 32b 39a 250b
600 MWL 6.3c 2.5a 0.79a 38a 41a 298a
Means with common letter in each column are not significantly different at P ¼ 0:05:
Table 4. The Effects of MWL on EDTA-Extractable Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cd, Co, and
Cr in the Soil
Extractable (mg kg21)
Treatment Fe Mn Zn Cu Pb Ni Cd Co Cr
0–30 cm
NO MWL 30d 45b 3.2b 1.8c 2.6c 0.6d 0.16a 0.6c 0.8d
Fertilizer 35cd 53b 5.1b 2.0c 3.9b 1.0c 0.23a 0.7c 1.0cd
150 MWL 40c 68ab 4.0b 2.5b 4.5ab 1.1bc 0.26a 0.9bc 1.2bc
300 MWL 54b 66ab 5.0b 3.0ab 5.0a 1.4ab 0.26a 1.1ab 1.3ab
600 MWL 80a 96a 8.6a 3.1a 5.3a 1.5a 0.30a 1.3ab 1.7a
30–60 cm
NO MWL 26c 58c 2.3c 1.7b 4.3b 1.7b 0.80a 1.2b 1.8b
Fertilizer 38b 70bc 3.0ab 1.9b 4.7a 1.9b 0.70a 1.0b 1.7b
150 MWL 44b 72bc 2.9b 3.2a 5.1a 3.2a 0.90a 1.3b 1.9b
300 MWL 61a 94ab 3.4ab 2.4a 5.2a 2.4a 0.90a 1.5ab 2.2b
600 MWL 64a 106a 3.5a 2.5a 5.4a 2.5a 0.90a 1.8a 2.9a
Means with common letter in each column are not significantly different at P ¼ 0:05:
MUNICIPAL WASTE LEACHATE 2015
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
The organic matter (OM) content of the soil, increased with application of
MWL (Table 3). There was a positive relationship between the rate of MWL
applied and the increase in OM content at the 0- to 60 cm depth. About 23 t
OM ha21 were added to the soil by 600 t ha21 MWL treatment.
The amount of available N, P, and K in soil increased as the result of
leachate application (Table 3). The increases were significant for both depths,
especially for 600 t ha21 treatment.
Figure 1. Effect of MWL on straw and grain yield of rice.
Table 5. The Effects of MWL on Accumulation of N, P, K in Rice
Accumulation (kg ha21)
Treatment N P K
Straw
NO MWL 203b 17.5c 212.6c
Fertilizer 427a 44.5c 476.6a
150 MWL 446a 46.2b 518.8a
300 MWL 534a 74.5a 267.9a
600 MWL 460a 44.4b 358.3b
Grain
NO MWL 147d 14.7c 15.4b
Fertilizer 210bc 21.1bc 30.7ab
150 MWL 247b 25.2b 24.4b
300 MWL 303a 36.7a 46.9a
600 MWL 194c 18.5bc 23.1b
Means with common letter in each column are not significantly different at P ¼ 0:05:
KHOSHGOFTARMANESH AND KALBASI2016
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Ta
ble
6.
Th
eE
ffec
tso
fM
WL
on
Co
nce
ntr
atio
ns
of
Mic
ron
utr
ien
tsan
dH
eav
yM
etal
sin
Ric
e
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n(m
gk
g2
1)
Tre
atm
ent
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
Pb
Ni
Cr
Co
Cd
Str
aw NO
MW
L2
90
.0c
15
6.7
b2
3.0
d1
3.3
c9
.0c
1.3
d2
.0c
1.5
a0
.6a
Fer
tili
zer
24
8.3
bc
16
1.7
b5
0.5
b1
5.2
c9
.7c
1.3
d2
.5b
c1
.5a
0.9
a
15
0M
WL
42
3.3
bc
16
8.3
b3
2.0
c1
6.8
c1
7.2
b2
.6c
2.7
bc
1.6
a0
.5a
30
0M
WL
43
8.3
ab
18
0.0
b5
4.0
c2
1.9
b1
5.6
b3
.3b
3.2
ab
1.6
a0
.9a
60
0M
WL
52
3.3
a1
98
.3a
70
.0a
31
.0a
19
.5a
4.0
a3
.8a
1.7
a0
.9a
Gra
in
NO
MW
L9
0.0
c1
7.7
c2
3.0
c1
3.8
c9
.0c
0.8
b3
.2b
0.3
a,
0.0
1
Fer
tili
zer
10
5.0
bc
17
.8c
60
.5a
15
.2c
9.7
c1
.5b
3.2
b0
.4a
,0
.01
15
0M
WL
10
0.0
bc
18
.0c
32
.0b
16
.2c
12
.5b
2.8
b3
.0a
0.6
a,
0.0
1
30
0M
WL
12
6.7
b2
4.3
b3
3.3
b2
1.9
b1
4.0
ab
3.5
a3
.4a
0.6
a,
0.0
1
60
0M
WL
21
8.3
a4
0.8
a6
2.0
a3
1.0
a1
5.1
a3
.5a
3.5
a0
.7a
,0
.01
Mea
ns
wit
hco
mm
on
lett
erin
each
colu
mn
are
no
tsi
gn
ifica
ntl
yd
iffe
ren
tat
P¼
0:0
5:
MUNICIPAL WASTE LEACHATE 2017
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Municipal waste leachate application significantly ðP ¼ 0:05Þ increased the
levels of EDTA-zinc, Fe, Mn, and Cu in the soil profile (Table 4). About 0.038 t
soluble-Fe ha21, 0.008 t soluble-Mn ha21, 0.011 t soluble-Zn ha21, and 0.002 t
soluble-Cu ha21 were added to the soil by application of 600 t ha21 MWL (Table 2).
Application of MWL increased the amount of EDTA-extractable Ni, Cr,
Co, and Pb in the soil but had no effect on EDTA-Cd (Table 4). Excess trace
elements in MWL may be an occasional problem for the agricultural application
of MWL, but usually MWL contains these metals at relatively low concentrations
(Table 4).
Effects of MWL on Rice Growth and Yield
Application of MWL increased the amounts of macro- and micronutrients
in the soil and in turn promoted soil productivity and crop yield. The straw and
grain yield and the amount of nutrient accumulation were highest with 300 t of
MWL ha21 (Fig. 1). Although low crop yield in 600 t ha21 plots may have been
caused by high soil salinity (Table 1), the highest yield of straw and grain
produced by 300 t ha21 plants, suggests that MWL application at reasonable rates
was associated with highest yields.
Crop yield was significantly correlated to any measured soil nutrition
attributes so that the amounts of macronutrient in plant increased as the result of
MWL application (Table 5). The highest N, P, and K accumulation was related to
300 t ha21 due to high rice yield in this treatment.
By MWL application, concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cr, and Ni
increased in straw and grain (Table 6). Municipal waste leachate had no
significant effect on Cr and Cd concentrations in plant. Lowering pH causes these
metal ions to be more soluble and thus more available to the plant.[20]
Municipal waste leachate is rich in plant nutrients and OM and is acidic,
therefore, it may be used as a liquid fertilizer especially in calcareous soils. Due
to the high leachate salinity, its frequent application as well as high rates is not
recommended, especially for saline-sensitive crops.
REFERENCES
1. Hue, N.V. Residual Effects of Sewage Sludge Application on Plant and Soil
Profile Chemical Composition. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1988, 19,
1633–1643.
2. Nyamangara, J.; Mzezewa, J. The Effect of Long-Term Sewage Sludge
Application on Zn, Cu, Ni and Pb Levels in Clay Loam Soil Under Pasture
Grass in Zimbabwe. Agric. Econ. Environ. 1999, 73, 199–204.
KHOSHGOFTARMANESH AND KALBASI2018
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
3. Hernandez, T.; Moreno, J.I.; Costa, F. Influence of Sewage Sludge
Application on Crop Yields and Heavy Metals Availability. Soil Sci. Plant
Nutr. 1991, 37, 201–210.
4. Rahimi, G.H. Effect of Garbage Compost on Salinity and Pollution of Soil
and Uptake of Heavy Metals by Corn Grown on Soils Treated by Compost.
WSC Thesis, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology,
Isfahan, Iran.
5. Gandomkar, A. Effect of Compost Leachate and Garbage Leachate on Soil
Properties and Growth and Yield of Corn. WSC Thesis, College of
Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
6. Mohammadinia, G.H. Chemical Composition of Garbage and Compost
Latex and Its Effects on Soil and Plant. WSC Thesis, College of
Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
7. Nelson, D.W.; Sommers, L.E. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic
Matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Agron. Monogr., 2nd Ed.; Page, A.L.,
Ed.; Part 2, ASA: Madison, WI, 1990; 539–577.
8. Sutton, A.L.; Nelson, D.W.; Mayrose, V.B.; Nye, J.C. Effects of Liquid
Swine Waste Applications on Corn Yield and Soil Chemical Composition.
J. Environ. Qual. 1978, 7 (3), 325–333.
9. Davis, T.L.; Greig, K.; Kirkham, M.B. Wastewater Irrigation of Vegetable
Crops. Biocycle 1988, 29 (9), 60–63.
10. Bole, J.B.; Bell, R.G. Land Application of Municipal Sewage Wastewater:
Yield and Chemical Composition of Forage Crops. J. Environ. Qual. 1978,
7 (2), 222–226.
11. Forbes, E.A.; Posner, A.M.; Quirk, J.P. The Adsorption of Divalent Cd, Co,
Pb and in Goethite. J. Soil Sci. 1976, 27, 154–166.
12. Higgins, J.A. Land Application of Sewage Sludge with Regard to Cropping
Systems and Pollution Potential. J. Environ. Qual. 1984, 13 (3), 441–448.
13. Stomberg, A.K.; Hemphill, L.D., Jr.; Volk, V.V. Yield and Elemental
Concentration of Sweet Corn Grown on Tannery Waste Amended Soil.
J. Environ. Qual. 1984, 13 (1), 162–166.
14. Mcintosh, M.S.; Foss, J.E.; Wolf, D.C.; Brandt, K.R.; Darmody, R. Effect
of Composted Municipal Sewage Sludge on Growth and Elemental
Composition on White Pine and Hybrid Poplar. J. Environ. Qual. 1984, 13
(1), 60–62.
15. Bradford, G.R.; Page, A.L.; Lund, L.J.; Olmosted, W. Trace Element
Concentrations of Sewage Treatment Plant Effluents and Sludges: Their
Interactions with Soils and Uptake by Plants. J. Environ. Qual. 1975, 4 (1),
123–127.
16. Cottenie, A.; Verloo, M.; Kickens, L.; Velghe, G.; Camerlynck, R.
Chemical Analysis for Plant and Soil; Laboratory of Analytical and
Agrochemistry, State University of Ghent: Belgium, 1982.
MUNICIPAL WASTE LEACHATE 2019
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14
17. Champan, H.D.; Part, P.F. Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plant and Water;
University of California, Division of Agriculture Science: Riverside, CA,
1961.
18. Olsen, S.R.; Sommers, L.E. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis,
Agron. Monogr., 2nd Ed.; Page, A.L., Ed.; Part 2, ASA: Madison, WI,
1990; 403–431.
19. Smith, J.; Doran, J.W. Measurement and Use of pH and Electrical
Conductivity for Soil Quality Analysis. In Methods for Assessing Soil
Quality, SSSA Spec. Publ. 49; Doran, J.W., Jones, A.J., Eds.; Soil Science
Society of America: Madison, WI, 1996; 169–185.
20. Reddy, M.R.; Lamerck, D.; Rezania, M.E. Uptake and Distribution of
Copper and Zinc by Soybean and Corn from Soil with Sewage Sludge. Plant
Soil 1989, 113, 271–274.
KHOSHGOFTARMANESH AND KALBASI2020
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 2
3:07
23
Nov
embe
r 20
14