ecological health risk of joint effect of biological and chemical environmental factors

Upload: sep-publisher

Post on 02-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Ecological Health Risk of Joint Effect of Biological and Chemical Environmental Factors

    1/4

    InternationalJournalofEnvironmentandResource(IJER)Volume2Issue2,May2013 www.ijer.org

    33

    EcologicalHealthRiskofJointEffectofBiologicalandChemicalEnvironmentalFactorsViktor.S.Rukavishnikov,Larisa.M.Sosedova

    FederalStateBudgetaryInstitutionEastSiberianScientificCenterofHumanEcology,SiberianBranchofthe

    RussianAcademyofMedicalSciences,Angarsk,Russia

    [email protected]

    AbstractTheobjectiveofthispaperistostudycommonmechanisms

    andpatternsofjointeffectofbiologicalandchemicalfactors

    on thehumanbody starting from experiments on animals.

    The subchronic experimental studywas performed on 700

    guinea pigs (inhalation with sulphur dioxide and AD).

    Aspects of risk evaluation isolated andjointwith chemical

    factor biotechnological products presented as

    microorganismsproducers of feed additives and a final

    albuminiferousproductareconsidered in this study. Itwas

    showedthatapplicationofADandsulfurdioxidedevelopsa

    response in the form of sensitization, allergopathy and

    toxicoallergopathy characteristics and patterns of pigs

    organism response to exposure of products of

    biotechnologicalsynthesishavebeendetermined.

    KeywordsJointEffect;ChemicalandBiologicalFctors;SulphurDioxide;AD;SDT;HDTIntroduction

    The development of the biotechnological industry

    yieldsopportunities tosolve theproblemsofmaterial

    and food resources, environmental pollution, energy

    supply,andpublichealthcare,aswellas tomeet thedemands of humanity, in addition, it also opens

    possibilities toproducenew kinds of goods.Modern

    production technologies include biotechnological

    methods used in manufacture of feed additives,

    hydrolytic yeast, interferon, enzymes, antibiotics,

    aminoacids,plantprotectionproducts,farmingmulti

    enzyme systems, insulin, and other bioactive

    substances. Manufacture of these products involves

    similar hygienic parameters determined by the

    biologicalnature ofmaterialsused in theproduction

    process and of the final products. Biotechnologicaladvances canbe limitedbypossibilityof abiological

    environmental pollution resulted from the way that

    these new products are obtained. Some studies have

    addressed strategies to solve the toxichygienic andecologicalproblems causedbybiologicalpollutionas

    opposedtowellstudiedchemicalpollution.Moreover,

    the isolated exposure effects of the introduction of a

    biological factor are considered by many to be an

    uncommonevent(N.I.Sheina,2011).

    There are no approved criteria used to evaluate the

    jointeffectsofbiologicalandchemicalfactors.Thedata

    presented herein is derived from longterm studies

    performedat theEasternSiberianScientificCenterof

    HumanEcologyof theSiberianBranchof theRussianAcademyofMedicalSciences (ESSHESBRAMS) that

    concern theoreticalandpracticalaspectsof ecological

    riskevaluationofthejointeffectsofabiologicalagent,

    the dust of an albuminiferous productmanufactured

    using amicrobiological synthesis of yeastlike fungi

    Candida,andachemicalsulfurdioxide.

    TheinitialstudywastriggeredbyaneventinAngarsk

    city in October 1988for patient complaints on

    bronchospasm whichdrew the attentionofAngarsk

    cityemergencymedicaldepartments(L.M.Sosedova,2003). The Angarskiy biotechnological plant having

    operatedfor10yearsreleasedanalbuminiferousdust

    (AD),abyproductofthemicrobialsynthesis,intothe

    air of the surrounding residential area.Quantities of

    AD released into the air were higher than the

    maximumpermissibleamounts.InOctober1988,there

    wasnowindduringa7dayperiodand,consequently,

    therewasnodispersionofpollutantsaccumulating in

    theair.Differentcommissionsinvestigatingthesource

    of the patients illnesses failed to reach a conclusion.

    They reported that either AD or a chemical factor(sulfur dioxide)was themain cause of the patients

  • 7/27/2019 Ecological Health Risk of Joint Effect of Biological and Chemical Environmental Factors

    2/4

    www.ijer.org InternationalJournalofEnvironmentandResource(IJER)Volume2Issue2,May2013

    34

    illnesses. Sulfur compounds such as sulfur dioxide

    were the most common air pollutants which was

    known that during that period the concentration of

    sulfurdioxideintheairhaddramaticallyincreased.(2

    4mg/m3)(L.M.Sosedova,2003).

    Materials and Methods

    Anexperimental studywasperformedon700guinea

    pigs provided by General Scientific Center VB

    Vector (Novosibirsk, Russia) inwhich each group

    included 812 mature laboratory animals. The

    experimentsonanimalswereperformedaccording to

    the European Convention for the Protection of

    VertebrateAnimalsUsed for Experimental and other

    Scientific Purposes (ETS 123) Strasbourg, 1986. The

    studies were carried out in accordance with the

    approved protocol by the Bioethical Committee of

    ESSHE SB RAMS, standard study operational

    procedures, and sanitary guidelines for settings,

    equipment, and maintenance of experimental

    biologicalclinics(vivaria).Sterilesawdustwasusedas

    bedding for allanimals. Standard combinedgranular

    complete diet feeding (extruded) for laboratory

    animals was used for small laboratory animals.

    Unlimitedtreatedtapwaterwasprovidedinstandard

    drinkers for all animals. The animals were kept incontrolled environmental conditions with air

    temperatureof1822 andarelativehumidityof60

    70%. Setting lighting was naturalartificial. Newly

    arrivedanimalswereplacedincagesinquarantinefor

    7days.

    Microbiologicalproductsofbiotechnologicalsynthesis

    areknown tobealbuminiferous allergens,which can

    causenotonlyhypersensitivity(sensitization)butalso

    smalldose (SDT) or highdose (HDT) tolerance.

    Therefore, threebaselinemodelsunderAD exposurewere examined: sensitization, SDT and HDT.

    Sensitizationofguineapigswasachievedby injection

    of 500 g AD mixed with incomplete Freunds

    adjuvantunder thehind limbaponeurosis.To induce

    tolerance, a150 g (SDT)ora 5000 g (HDT)water

    soluble AD polysaccharide antigen was injected

    intracardially into experimental animals under light

    ether anesthesia for 14 days before sensitization.

    Inhalationprimingwithsulfurdioxidewasperformed

    byplacingguineapigsinprimechambersfor4hoursperday foreach in theperiodof10days.Thesulfur

    dioxide concentration (24mg/m3), temperature, and

    humidityweremaintained at the same level. Sulfur

    dioxide inhalationwasperformedon threeoccasions:

    14 daysbeforeAD injection, simultaneousness with

    ADinjection,and14daysafterADinjection.

    The animals were tested for hypersensitivity 2128

    days post priming termination. Instant and delayed

    type hypersensitivity were determined by mast cell

    destruction (E.F.Chernushenko, 1978).Thepresence

    of skinsensitizing antibodies was detected using

    Ovaryspassivecutaneousanaphylaxistest (Z.Ovary,

    1952).Othertestsincludedthepositiveintracutaneous

    allergytest,reproductionofanaphylacticshockevent,

    antigenspecific rosetting and antigenspecific

    leukocytefixation(S.M.Pogorelskaya,1986),moreover,

    passiveallergytransmissionwasassessedbymeansof

    leukocyte mass (C. Prausnitz, 1962) and blood

    histaminecount (G.V.Selyuzhitsky,1983).Neutrophil

    functions were analyzed by phagocyte number,

    phagocyte index, blood phagocytic activity, and

    metabolic activitywithmelamineformaldehyde latex

    ina spontaneousand latexstimulatedHCTtest (R.V.

    Petrov,1989).Lymphokineproductionwasmonitored

    by leukocyte fixation triggeredbymitogens such as

    concanavalin and phytohemagglutinin (S.M.

    Pogorelskaya,1986).AntigensproducedintheRussian

    MycologicalCenter (St.Petersburg)wereused in the

    reactionstodeterminespecific immuneresponses.An

    integrated approachwas applied to the experimental

    studies,which allowed analysis homeostasis changes

    using the principle doseorganism status and

    determining a common parameter for each animal

    group(V.V.Sadovskiy,1996).Statisticaldataanalysis

    was performed using Statistica 6.0 software for

    Windows(licenseAXXR004E642326FA).Differences

    amongstudyandcontrolgroupswereanalyzedusingStudents test. If comparison samples were not

    normally distributed (according to the Kolmogorov

    Smirnovcriterion),thenonparametricMannWhitney

    Utestwasused.

    Result and Discussion

    The experimental model allowed evaluation of the

    guineapigsresponse tocombinedexposure tosulfur

    dioxideandAD[L.M.Sosedova,2003;L.M.Sosedova,

    2010]. This exposure can induce responses that varywith the sequence of administration or intensity of

  • 7/27/2019 Ecological Health Risk of Joint Effect of Biological and Chemical Environmental Factors

    3/4

    InternationalJournalofEnvironmentandResource(IJER)Volume2Issue2,May2013 www.ijer.org

    35

    exposure(Figure1).

    FIG.1TYPESOFORGANISMRESPONSEOFGUINEAPIGSTO

    JOINTEFFECTOFALBUMINIFEROUSDUSTANDCHEMICAL

    FACTOR

    Theexperimentalfindingsshowedsensitizationinhalf

    oftheanimalsexposedtobothADandsulfurdioxide.

    Moreover, the intensity of the sensitizationwas 50%

    higherinsomeanimalscomparedwiththosethatwere

    only exposed to AD. Allergopathy and toxico

    allergopathywasfound in25%oftheanimals ineach

    group. It was possible that the final response

    depended on the phenotype of the

    immunoallergologicreactiontoallergens.Considering

    primary sensitization, SDT and HDT, the following

    effectsonhealthweredetermined:

    Sulfurdioxideinhalationledtodevelopmentofallergopathy in animals sensitized to AD.

    Inhalation simultaneously with or prior to

    sensitization toADhad insignificant effect on

    theintensityoftheresponse.

    Sulfurdioxideinhalationmadetheanimalslosetheir smalldose immunological tolerance,

    whichcausedthemtobecomesensitizedtoAD.

    Sulfur dioxide inhalation with or post HDTresultedinatoxicallergopathiceffect.

    Thus,priorinhalationofsulfurdioxidedidnotleadto

    HDT but caused apparent allergopathy in

    experimental animals. The results of experimental

    modeling of the combined effects of albuminiferous

    dust (a byproduct of biotechnology) and sulfur

    dioxide(achemical)madethefollowingconclusions:

    A response to the combined effects ofbiological and chemical factorsdeterminedby

    itsbaseline prenosological conditionsmaybe

    diverse: The sequence of exposure tobiological and

    chemical factors was important in

    understanding an animals quantitative and

    qualitativeresponsetoexposure;

    Itwasimportanttoconsiderbothspecificandnonspecific characteristics of a physiological

    systemfunctioningtakingintoaccountthekeyroleofimmunestatuschanges[L.M.Sosedova,

    2003;L.M.Sosedova,2010]

    Hygienicmodelingalloweddevelopmentofamethod

    to study the combined effects of biological and

    chemical factors (L.M. Sosedova, 2010) and yielded

    severalsignificantprinciples.

    The threebaselinemodels (sensitization, SDT,and HDT) should be created for an

    experimental study of biological factor

    exposureofanynature.

    Chemical exposure should occur in thefollowing sequence: prior to, simultaneously

    with, and postAD injection to determine the

    mostdetrimentalsequenceofadministration.

    Tounderstand the featureof theresponseandevaluation of an animals condition, and

    analyzehomeostasischanges, itwas important

    toemploytheprincipledoseorganismstatus

    toevaluatealleffectsasawhole.

    Increases residential were modern productiontechnologiesused in theplants located inornear the

    residential area and the methodological principles

    outlinedheremaybecome thebasis forbiomodeling

    to study the combined effects of differentbiological

    andchemicalfactors.

    Theseexperimentalstudiesmayallowidentificationof

    the cause of the increase in patient complaints of

    bronchospasmodic syndrome at emergency

    departments inOctober 1988 inAngarsk citv [L.M.

    Sosedova,2003;L.M.Sosedova,2010].Theoperationofthebiotechnological plant released large amounts of

    AD into the air of the residential area.AD exposure

    over several years might cause a prenosological

    responsedifferentdependingonimmunoallergological

    phenotype and the quantity of absorbed allergen in

    sensitive populations. Some people developed latent

    sensitization to AD;while others developed SDT or

    HDT; i.e. the organism as a system adaptedwith a

    high degree of selfregulation using additional

    resources reformed to thenew levelof compensatory

    adaptation [L.M. Sosedova, 2003;G.M. Bodienkova,1996].

    Albuminiferous

    dust

    Noeffect Sensitization Smalldose

    toleranceHighdose

    tolerance

    +Chemicalfactor

    Sensitization Toxico

    allergopathyAllergopathyCrosssectional

    sensitization

  • 7/27/2019 Ecological Health Risk of Joint Effect of Biological and Chemical Environmental Factors

    4/4

    www.ijer.org InternationalJournalofEnvironmentandResource(IJER)Volume2Issue2,May2013

    36

    A prenosological response to AD, and subsequent

    exposure to a chemical factor led tovarious types of

    bronchospasms with allergic or toxic components.

    Various types of responsesmightbe responsible for

    different conditions in people, thus physicians

    registered bronchospasms of both an allergic and atoxicnature.

    Thus, the causal or primary factor that prepared an

    animal to develop bronchospasm was AD, a by

    product of a microbial synthesis, and the modified

    triggerorrisk factorwasachemical.Epidemiological,

    hygienic, and allergological studies suggested

    sulfurous anhydride which might have been the

    chemical pollutantwhich could causebronchospasm

    by itself due to its irritating [C. A. Frenga, 1999; F.

    Riedel,1988].Chemicalfactorexposuretoabodywith

    modifiedspecificreactivity toADcancauserecurrent

    bronchospasmodic allergic or toxicallergic reactions

    evenwhenADwasabsentintheair.InFebruary1995,

    asimilareventoccurred inAngarskcity,althoughthe

    biotechnologicalplantwasnotinoperationatthattime.

    The larger the population that develops sensitization

    orHDT to ADwas, the greater the possibility of a

    widespread event was. Clinical pathologies can be

    influenced by contact of an organism with other

    albuminiferous allergens and the increasing kinds of

    pollutants in both industrial and agricultural areas

    (pollen, hair, down, medicine, food, etc.) may have

    antigenic determinants in common with proteins of

    biotechnologicalsynthesis.

    Extrapolationoftheresultsofexperimentalstudieson

    humans allowed us to suggest about the nature and

    causesof the formationof thepopulationofAngarsk

    bronchospasm. Analysis of experiments on animals

    showedthedevelopmentofseveralformsofresponse

    whenexposedtoADandsulfurdioxide:sensitization,

    allergopathy and toxicoallergopathy. Similar

    symptoms of bronchospasm detected and affectedpatients.

    Thelackofmonitoringoftotalbiologicalairpollution

    includingtheareaswithbiotechnologicalplantsdidnt

    allow prediction or evaluation of unfavorable events

    associated with mass cases of acute toxicallergic

    disorders. It should be considered unreasonable to

    place biotechnological plants in industrial cities or

    downwindofchemicalplants,sinceitwasriskytothe

    population of the combined effects ofbiological and

    chemical factors.Moreover, ultraviolet and radiation

    exposuremaycausecreationofnewcompoundswith

    unexpectedqualities.

    REFERENCES

    C. A. Frenga, J. O. Kosnig, P. V. Williams, Journal of

    OccupationalandEnvironmentalMedicine,8,11 (1999).

    C.Prausnitz,H.Kustner,ClinicalAspectsof Immunology,

    808,16(1962).

    E. F. Chernushenko and L.S. Kogosova, Editors,

    Immunologicalinvestigationsintheclinic.Kiev,(1978).

    F. Riedel, M. Kramer, C. Scheibenbogen, C. H. L. Riger,

    JournalofAllergyandClinicalImmunology,82,527534

    (1988).

    G.M. Bodienkova, Editor. Mechanisms of immunological

    reactivity disturbances in populationwith ecologically

    induced bronchospasmodic syndrome. Proceedings of

    4thRussianJapaneseInternationalmedicalsymposium,(1996)October1619;Irkutsk,Russia.

    G.V. Selyuzhitsky, A.A. Belkin, M.A. Pinigin, G.A.

    Bagdasaryan,V.I.Nemyria,L.A.Teplikina,O.V.Zaremba,

    Y.E. Korneev, L.M. Chaban, Editors, Methodical

    guidelines for studying allergic effect at feed protein

    OEL(occupationalexposurelimit)intheatmosphericair,

    Moscow,Medicine(1983).

    L.M. Sosedova, V. S. Rukovishnikov, S. F. Shayahmetov,

    Journal ofmedicine ofwork and industrial ecology, 3,

    1519(2003).

    L.M.Sosedova,V.S.Rukovishnikov.Journalofhygieneand

    sanitation,5,7579(2010).

    N.I.Sheina,N.G.Ivanov,U.P.Pivovarov,Journalofapplied

    toxicology,2,1018(2011).

    R.V. Petrov, R.M.Haitov, B.V. Pinegin, I.V. Oradovskaya,

    O.F.Eremina,M.Z.Saidov,Editors,Evaluationofhuman

    immune status during mass examination, Moscow,

    Medicine(1989).

    S.M. Pogorelskaya, A. V. Litodskaya, N.V. Mokeeva, I.B.

    Makarova,R.M.Kollo,K.I.Kalchenko,Editors,Methods

    oflaboratorydiagnosticsofmycogenicsensitizationand

    allergic conditions triggeredby industrial products of

    PVC (protein vitamin concentrate),Moscow,Medicine

    (1986).

    V.V.Sadovskiy,A.V.Litodskaya,A.B.Vifleemskiy,Journal

    of medicine of work and industrial ecology, 1, 3236

    (1996).

    Z.Ovary,InternationalArchivesofAllergyandImmunology,3,393396(1952).