dynamics of wilson loops - int.washington.edudynamics of wilson loops • wilson loop distributions...
TRANSCRIPT
Dynamics of Wilson Loops
• Wilson Loop Distributions and Diffusion
• Casimir Scaling and Screening in Confining Phase
• Wilson Loop Effective Action
• Approximate Center Symmetry
• Correlation functions of large Wilson loops
• Summary
A.Brzoska - D. Steinbacher - J. Negele - M.Thies
Wilson Loop Distributions and Diffusion
Wilson-loops
W =1
2tr P exp{ig
∮CdxµAµ(x)}
Vacuum expectation values of Wilson loops
〈0|W |0〉 =
∫d[A]e−S[A]W [A] , S = −1
4
∫d 4xFa
µνFaµν
of sufficiently large size satisfy in the confining phasean area law
〈0|W |0〉 ∼ e−σA
with string tension σ.
For rectangular loops A = RT
x
t
R
T
and for sufficiently large times T � R Wilson loopsdetermine the interaction energy V (R) of static quarks
g2 1
R, R → 0
〈0|W |0〉 ∼ e−T V (R) , V (R) ∼σR , R → ∞
Distribution of Wilson loops
p(ω) = 〈0|δ (ω − W ) |0〉
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
2 40−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
SU(2) lattice gauge theory
Wilson loop distribution for rect-
angular loops of different areas
Values of Wilson loops in different
planes centered at the origin as function
of the area (fm2) for a single configuration
Diffusion of Wilson Loops
When increasing size of loop in 4-dimensional Euclideanspace as function of parameter t - ”time ”, value ofthe (untraced) Wilson loop carries out Brownian mo-tion on the group manifold, S3 (SU (2)). The motionof an ensemble of these degrees of freedom is in turndescribed by a diffusion equation. Due to gauge invari-ance of Wilson-loops diffusion is independent of 2-ndpolar and of azimuthal angle on S3. With
ω = cos ϑ
Laplacian given by
∆ =1
sin2 ϑ
d
dϑsin2 ϑ
d
dϑ
Diffusion on the sphere
ϑ
NLaplacian
∆ = 1sin ϑ
∂∂ϑ
sin ϑ ∂∂ϑ
+ 1sin2 ϑ
∂2
∂ϕ2
= −L2
0 ϑ π
Uniform Distribution
on the sphere
1
Diffusion equation on S3
(d
dt− ∆) G(ϑ, t) =
1
sin2 ϑδ(ϑ)δ(t)
Eigenfunctions of Laplace operator
ψn =
√2
π
sin nϑ
sin θ, −∆ ψn = (n2 − 1)ψn
Solution of diffusion equation
G(ϑ, t) =2
πsin ϑθ(t)
∞∑n=1
n sin nϑ e−(n2−1)t
t−3/2 exp−ϑ2
4t, t → 0
G(ϑ, t) ∼2
π, t → ∞
QED-behavior for small t, uniform distribution on S3
asymptotically.Relation between ”time” t and Wilson-loop size R
not determined. ”Time” t obtained from fit of expecta-tion value of Wilson loop, 〈0|W (R)|0〉 = exp(−3t)
−1 −0.5 0 0.5 10
1e+06
2e+06
1 x 12 x 13 x 12 x 24 x 15 x 13 x 24 x 25 x 2
Wilson loop distribution in SU(2) lattice gauge theory
Casimir Scaling and Screening in Confining PhaseHigher representation Wilson loops
Expectation value of an observable O(ϑ) in a diffusionprocess on the S3
〈O(ϑ)〉 =2
π
∫ π
0
sin ϑ d ϑ O (ϑ)∞∑
n=1
n sin n ϑ e−(n2−1)t
Wilson loops in the 2 j + 1 representation of SU(2)
Wj(ϑ) =1
2j + 1tr exp 2iϑ
−j
. . .j
=1
2j + 1
sin(2j + 1)ϑ
sin ϑ∼ ψ2j+1(ϑ)
〈Wj〉 = e−4j(j+1)·t
Laplace-Beltrami = Quadratic Casimir
Approximate Casimir Scaling SU(3) Lattice GaugeTheories
Potentials and their ratios in different representations of SU(3), G.S. Bali
Casimir Scaling ⇔ Wilson Loop Diffusion
Two regimes in confining phase
• Regime of Casimir ScalingConfinement of fundamental and adjoint chargesWilson loop distribution result of diffusion
• Screening RegimeConfinement of half-integer (fundamental) chargesand screening of integer (adjoint) charges
Strong coupling implies screening
C
C
Planar tiling of 3-d tiling offundamental loop adjoint loop
3-d tiling suppressed in regime of Casimir scaling
Screening
Diffusion of Wilson loops in the presence of forces de-scribed by potential V (ϑ)
-1 -0,5 0 0,5 1-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
Haar Measure and eigenfunctions
of Laplacian ψ2j+1(ϑ) as a func-
tion of cos ϑ for j = 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2
Vanishing of fundamental Wilson loop for size → ∞guaranteed if V (ϑ) symmetric around equator of S3
ϑ = π2
V (π/2 − ϑ) = V (ϑ − π/2)
Symmetric potentials admix j = 1/2 to half-integerstates, j = 0 to integer Laplace - eigenfunctions
Confinement → Symmetric V
Casimir scaling → Vanishing V
Wilson Loop Effective ActionConnecting to QCD
Effective action of Wilson loops from diffusion (=Eu-clidean Quantum-Mechanics of point particle)
S ∼∫
dtϑ̇2
In the confinement regime t ∼ ρ2
Seff[ϑ] =3
8πσ
∫dρ
ρ
(dϑ
dρ
)2
Yang-Mills action in gauge
Aaϕ = δa,3
1
gπρ
(π
2− a(t, ρ, z)
)
where (circular) Wilson loops become elementary de-
grees of freedom
W (t, ρ, z) = sin(a(t, ρ, z))
SYM =
∫ρ dρ dϕ dz dt
×{ 1
2π2g2 ρ2[(∂ρa)2 + (∂za)2 + (∂ta)2] + L′} ,
Assume
• coupling of Wilson loops at different t, z to eachother to be negligible beyond a range t2 + z2 ≤ λ2
• within this range no dependence of the Wilson loopson t, z
• negligible coupling to other degrees of freedom
SYM ≈ λ2
g2
∫dρ
ρ(∂ρa)2
From comparison with effective action
λ2 =3g2
8πσApproximate Center Symmetry
As suggested by the diffusion model Lagrangian is sym-metric under reflections of the Wilson loops at the equa-tor of S3
Z̃ : a(t, ρ, z) → −a(t, ρ, z)
accompanied by changes in the other fields. Residualgauge transformation with twist - in analogy with cen-ter symmetry if a space time dimension is compact.
Unless for vanishing ρ, ρAϕ → 0, a singular mag-netic field ∼ δ(ρ2) of infinite action is generated andtherefore
ρ → 0 : a(t, ρ, z) → π
2Boundary condition at ρ = 0 prevents symmetry Z̃
to be realized and gives rise to distributions of Wilson-loops for small ρ concentrated around a = π/2. Withincreasing loop size, the effect of the ”boundary condi-tion” at ρ = 0 decreases and the symmetry is approxi-matively restored as in diffusion of Wilson loops. Thevacuum expectation value of the Wilson loop is a mea-sure of the restoration of the symmetry
〈0|W (t, ρ, z)|0〉 ∼ exp(−σπρ2)
If exact the symmetry (Z̃) would require 〈0|W |0〉 = 0.
Correlation function of large Wilson loops
x
y
Approximate center symmetry makes thedynamics of Polyakov and Wilson loopsof large size similar. Symmetries protectgauge strings from decaying.In particular from
〈0|P (d)P (0)|0〉 ∼ exp(−σβd)
one expects
〈0|W (d, ρ)W (0, ρ)|0〉 ∼ exp(−σ2πρd)
Accounting for exp(−πρ2) suppressed contributionsfrom the violation of the Z̃ symmetry
〈0|W (d, ρ) W (0, ρ)|0〉 ≈ e−2σπρ2(c0 + c1e
−mgbd + ..)
+ d1e−σ2πρd
• The first class of contribution arises from the inter-mediate ground-state and glueballs. Not present forPolyakov loops - forbidden by exact center symme-try Z
• Second class of contributions - common to Wilsonand Polyakov loops - arises from intermediate stateswhich are odd under Z and Z̃ respectively
-1 -0,5 0 0,5
-10
-5
0
5
10R=2R=3R=4R=5R=6R=7R=8R=9R=10R=11R=12
Logarithm of correlation func-- tion of quadratic Wilson-loops- (R×R) as a function of- ξ = 2Rd − R2
For sufficiently large Wilson loops we expect[〈0|W (d,R) W (0, R)|0〉 − 〈0|W (0, R)|0〉2] /〈0|W (0, R)|0〉2
≈ c1e−mgb
ξ+R2
2R + d1e−2σξ + ...
Geometrical interpretation
d
R
∼ exp{−2πσRd} ∼ exp{−2πσR2−mgbd}For large loops, up to the glueball correction, the sur-
face of minimal area dominates. Change in configura-tion around d ≈ R - Gross-Ooguri transition.
Wilson loop operators applied to the vacuum generateapproximative stationary states of energy
E[W (R)] ≈ σ2πR
Single (gauge) string states are approximative eigen-states of the Hamiltonian.
Summary
• Wilson loop distribution - result of diffusion process
• Casimir scaling: a new regime in the confinementphase, different from strong coupling limit
• Approximate center symmetry associated with con-finement
• Sufficiently large Wilson loops generate approxima-tive stationary single string states