draft land management plan mt coot-tha zipline · organised events), hiking (including the annual...

Draft Land Management Plan Mt Coot-tha Zipline DRAFT Report November 2018

DRAFT Land Management Plan – Mt Coot-tha Zipline, November 2018 Brisbane City Council

2

Suite 6, 63 Primary School Court Maroochydore QLD 4558 PO Box 2092 Sunshine Plaza QLD 4558 P: 07 5443 6247 E: [email protected] cprgroup.com.au Cover image: View to Brisbane CBD from Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout © CPR Group COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER This DRAFT land management plan (the plan) has been prepared for the benefit of and use by Brisbane City Council (the Client) in accordance with the terms of the engagement. The plan must not be used for any other purpose, or by any other party, nor is the plan to be made available to any other party without the prior written consent of the Client. No part of this plan may be reproduced in part or full without the prior, written permission of the Client. All statements, projections and opinions expressed in this plan are given in good faith and have been prepared in reliance upon our own observations and consultation and upon information that has been provided to us. Recommendations and future projections are based upon the data, representations, assumptions and estimates provided to us. The Client indemnifies CPR Group (which includes its consultants) against any and all claims against the Client or CPR Group by reason of any information omitted or false information included in this plan. The contents of this plan have not been independently audited. As such, the Client assumes the entire risk related to its use of this plan. CPR Group does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the contents of, or recommendations or projections in this plan and disclaims any and all warranties, whether express or implied, including (without limitation) any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event will CPR Group be liable to the Client or to any third party for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this plan. All intellectual property in the processes and methodology used to create this document, together with the design of graphics, symbols and definitions contained in this document is the property of CPR Group and is protected by Australian and international copyright laws. All rights reserved. No part of the intellectual property of CPR Group may be used, reproduced, sold, transferred, modified, published or made available to any other party without the prior written permission of CPR Group.


3

Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 5

1.1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 7

2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose and Goals ................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Application .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Land Management Plan Duration ........................................................................................... 8

3 PROPOSED USES OF THE LAND ................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Proposed Developments ......................................................................................................... 9

4 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 16 4.1 Land Management Planning Information Kit ......................................................................... 16 4.2 Land Act 1994 and Land Regulation 2009 ............................................................................ 16 4.3 Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy ..................................................................................... 16 4.4 City of Brisbane Act 2010 and City of Brisbane Regulation 2012 ......................................... 17 4.5 Brisbane City Plan 2014 ....................................................................................................... 17 4.6 Vegetation Management Act 1999 ........................................................................................ 18

4.6.1 Vegetation Categories .............................................................................................. 18 4.6.2 Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) .................................................... 19 4.6.3 Wetlands .................................................................................................................. 19 4.6.4 Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3 Key Findings .......... 19

4.7 Queensland Heritage Act 1992 ............................................................................................. 20 4.8 Brisbane City Council Corporate Plan 2016-2017 to 2020-21 and Brisbane Vision 2031 .... 22 4.9 Brisbane City Council Sustainable Built Environment Policy ................................................ 23 4.10 Brisbane: Clean, Green, Sustainable 2017-2031 ................................................................. 23 4.11 Brisbane City Council Local Laws ......................................................................................... 24 4.12 Advancing Tourism 2016-2020 ............................................................................................. 25 4.13 Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2016-2020 ............................................................................. 25 4.14 Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030 .................................................................................... 26 4.15 ShapingSEQ 2017 ................................................................................................................ 26 4.16 State Planning Policy July 2017 ............................................................................................ 28

5 TRUSTEE DETAILS ........................................................................................................................ 30 6 EXISTING TENURE OF THE SUBJECT LAND .............................................................................. 31 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT LAND ...................................................................................... 32

7.1 History ................................................................................................................................ 32 7.2 Site Description and Usage .................................................................................................. 33 7.3 Local Area Description ........................................................................................................ 34 7.4 Existing Uses ........................................................................................................................ 35 7.5 Existing Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 35 7.6 Flooding ................................................................................................................................ 35 7.7 Opportunities and Challenges ............................................................................................... 35

7.7.1 Opportunities ............................................................................................................ 35 7.7.2 Challenges ............................................................................................................... 38


4

8 MANAGEMENT OF THE TRUST LAND ......................................................................................... 39 8.1 Primary Use .......................................................................................................................... 39 8.2 Secondary Use ..................................................................................................................... 39 8.3 Ongoing Secondary Use Considerations .............................................................................. 40

8.3.1 Strategic Value ......................................................................................................... 40 8.3.2 Consistency with Primary Use ................................................................................. 40 8.3.3 Commerciality .......................................................................................................... 41 8.3.4 Exclusivity and Restrictions of Proposed Use .......................................................... 41 8.3.5 Incremental Progression and Forward Planning ...................................................... 42

8.4 Proposed Trustee Leasing .................................................................................................... 43 8.4.1 Lease Terms ............................................................................................................ 43 8.4.2 Rental, Fees and Charges ....................................................................................... 44

8.5 Native Title ............................................................................................................................ 44 9 CONSULTATION ............................................................................................................................. 45

9.1 Proposed consultation methodology ..................................................................................... 45 9.2 Consultation Conducted Throughout Project ........................................................................ 45

10 PROPOSED LAND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ............................................................................. 46 10.1 Land Management Action Plan ............................................................................................. 46 10.2 Summaries of Planning Reports ........................................................................................... 53

10.2.1 Ecological Assessment Report Summary ................................................................ 53 10.2.2 Indigenous and Cultural Analysis Summary ............................................................ 55 10.2.3 Bushfire Risk Management Plan Summary ............................................................. 55 10.2.4 Acoustic Impact Assessment Summary ................................................................... 55 10.2.5 Traffic Impact Statement Summary .......................................................................... 56 10.2.6 Visual Impact Assessment Summary ....................................................................... 56 10.2.7 Heritage Impact Statement Summary ...................................................................... 60 10.2.8 Stormwater Management Plan Summary ................................................................ 60

11 ASSET MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................. 62 11.1 Proposed Asset Management ............................................................................................... 62 11.2 Ongoing Asset Management Areas ...................................................................................... 64 11.3 Ongoing Maintenance Planned ............................................................................................. 66

12 MONITORING AND REVISION ....................................................................................................... 67


5

1 Executive Summary and Recommendations

1.1 Executive Summary

This DRAFT full land management plan has been prepared in line with the Land Act 1994 to guide Brisbane City Council, in its capacity as trustee, for the future development, use and management of the trust land, Lot 2 on SP241566, 200 Sir Samuel Griffith Drive, Mt Coot-tha. The plan provides clear information to the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy regarding the proposed development of the Mt Coot-tha Zipline and proposed trustee leasing associated with the zipline project. The land over which this plan applies, Lot 2 on SP241566, is a Deed of Grant in Trust (DOGIT), and is therefore subject to the provisions of the Land Act 1994 as it applies to trust land. The subject site measures approximately 602.2015 ha1 and is designated as Public Park. Lot 2 on SP241566 lies within the 1,600 ha Mt Coot-tha Forest, which is Brisbane’s largest natural area. Mt Coot-tha is a popular leisure and recreation destination for Brisbane residents and visitors. Current Public Park activities at Mt Coot-tha include bush walking, flora and fauna interpretation, mountain biking, cycling (including social cycling and organised events), hiking (including the annual Oxfam Trailwalker event), picnics, cultural heritage interpretation, heritage walks, music events, visiting the restaurant and café, and visiting the attractions within the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha. Sir Samuel Griffith Drive is a tourist drive, providing access to many picnic areas and vantage points in Mt Coot-tha. Mt Coot-tha is approximately 5.8km from the Brisbane CBD and is considered a unique and valued icon due to its location, resources and historical and cultural significance. Mt Coot-tha offers a variety of walking tracks, as well as mountain bike trails and some designated horse-riding trails. The site includes nine different picnic areas and hundreds of known flora and fauna species. The infrastructure at the Mt Coot-tha Summit includes the Summit Lookout, Summit Restaurant and Kuta Café, manicured gardens and a gift shop. Mt Coot-tha Quarry, which supplies asphalt products to support Council's asphalt production and road surfacing programs, is located in the northeast of the subject site. The Summit Restaurant and Kuta Café are located on a separate Deed of Grant in Trust, Lot 1079 on SL5015, and are therefore not addressed in this land management plan. Brisbane City Council has commissioned a separate land management plan for Lot 1079 on SL5015 to address the trustee leasing of the restaurant and café. Brisbane City Council proposes to deliver the Mt Coot-tha Zipline, which is described as a low-impact, environmentally-sensitive, world-class ecotourism experience, at Mt Coot-tha. According to Council, the proposed development offers a unique opportunity to capture Mt Coot-tha’s proximity to the Brisbane CBD and showcase views across the city towards Moreton Bay, and to increase appreciation and promotion of the forest landscape, natural environment and cultural heritage values of the Mt Coot-tha precinct. The Mt Coot-tha Zipline is proposed to occupy leased parts of the DOGIT, Lot 2 on SP241566, with the total proposed trustee lease area representing approximately 1% of the total area of the trust land, being 5.9579 ha on-ground and 9.6667 ha volumetric above ground. The proposal includes the establishment of three key experiences, namely the Scenic Zipline, Treetop Canopy Tour and Skywalk Tour, which focus on the natural environment, biodiversity, scenic amenity and recreational values of Mt Coot-tha. An arrival centre will introduce the experience to visitors. The Mt Coot-tha Zipline proposal aligns with the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Master Plan, which was completed in June 2018. It also aligns with the following strategic planning documents: n ShapingSEQ 2017 n Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030 n Brisbane City Plan 2014 n Brisbane’s Future Blueprint 1 http://cityplan2014maps.brisbane.qld.gov.au/CityPlan/


6

n Brisbane: Clean, Green, Sustainable 2017-2031 n Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2016-2020 n Advancing Tourism 2016-2020 Brisbane City Council proposes to develop the Mt Coot-tha Zipline in a manner which is sensitive to the values of Mt Coot-tha, supporting the ongoing use of the trust land as a Public Park, and minimising any impact on the existing uses of the land by Brisbane residents and visitors. To this end, extensive research, investigations, consultation and planning for the proposed development have been completed. Technical reports that have been prepared in 2018 for the proposed development include: n Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline n Ecological Assessment Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3 n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Turrbal Historical and Cultural Analysis) n Bushfire Risk Assessment and Management Plan - Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility n Traffic Impact Statement Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project n Visual Impact Assessment of Mt Coot-tha Zipline n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Heritage Impact Statement n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Stormwater Management Plan n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Zipline) Landscape Concept n Vegetation Management Plan and Aboricultural Impact Assessment Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Powerful Owl and Forest Raptor Assessment n Noise Impact Assessment – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project, Sir Samuel Griffith Drive Mt Coot-tha Since being announced in 2016, Brisbane City Council’s proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project has generated considerable community interest. Council has conducted extensive, non-statutory community engagement during the development of the zipline proposal. This has included information on Council’s website and in the city-wide Living in Brisbane publication, community information sessions, consultation with Queensland Government departments and peak tourism groups, stakeholder meetings, and two newsletters distributed to over 60,000 residents. Engagement with community stakeholders, as well as research and site investigations conducted during the preparation of the various technical studies listed above, have informed the layout and design of the proposal, including amendments to the original alignment, to ensure the proposal is responsive and sensitive to the values of Mt Coot-tha. The Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy has reviewed the proposed consultation methodology for this land management plan and has acknowledged that it conforms to the department’s land management planning consultation requirements. According to the Land Act 1994, the Queensland Government’s Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust (Version 9) and the Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy (PUX/901/209 Version 6.00), Brisbane City Council’s proposal to develop the Mt Coot-tha Zipline represents a secondary use of the trust land. A secondary use is a use that is to be made of the whole or part of an area of the trust land by a third party (i.e. other than the State or Brisbane City Council as trustee). Authority for a secondary use is granted under the Land Act 1994 by the issue of a trustee lease or trustee permit over the whole or part of the trust land, by the trustee with the approval of the Minister. The Land Act 1994 requires that a secondary use must not diminish the purpose of the trust land, which in the case of the subject site at Mt Coot-tha, is Public Park. Subject to input to this plan from the community, to be invited during the land management plan community consultation program, and based on the findings and recommendations of the technical reports commissioned by Brisbane City Council, this plan confirms that the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project is an appropriate secondary use of the trust land. The proposed secondary use is appropriate to the qualities and capabilities for which the trust land was originally set aside (Public Park) and it would: n Not diminish the primary purpose of the trust land (Public Park) or impair or reduce the ability of the trust land to

fulfil its primary purpose n Allow for ongoing general public use of the trust land and not impact existing uses of Mt Coot-tha n Provide a desirable service to users of the trust land, which is complementary to the primary purpose of the land n Support a range of activities and outcomes that improve the quality of life for the community n Sensitively support and enhance the amenity of the trust land


7

n Generate valuable income for reinvestment in maintenance of the trust land This land management plan confirms that it is acceptable for Brisbane City Council to lease a portion of the DOGIT to a suitable operator of the proposed zipline development, subject to rental being set at a level that would effectively contribute to the ongoing costs of maintaining the trust land. While the extent of commerciality and exclusivity to be introduced by the proposed development is modest in terms of the lease area representing approximately 1% of the total land area of the subject site, it will be important for an appropriate rental to be charged, having regard to the use, the rental that would be paid for similar uses on private land, the viability of the activity and the benefit to the community of the activity.2 As trustee, Brisbane City Council will need to retain relevant records to demonstrate that the proceeds generated from rental income are sufficient for the development and maintenance of the trust land or for other grouped trust land in the area. Brisbane City Council, as trustee, will continue to invest in the precinct in the form of capital improvements, land management operations, maintenance and civil infrastructure, which will provide support for the management and maintenance of the DOGIT for the long-term. As defined in Section 4 of the Land Act 1994, trust land must be managed for the benefit of the people of Queensland by having regard to the following principles: n Sustainability – Sustainable resource use and development to ensure existing needs are met and the State’s

resources are conserved for the benefit of future generations n Evaluation – Land evaluation based on the appraisal of land capability and the consideration and balancing of

the different economic, environmental, cultural and social opportunities and values of the land n Development – Allocating land for development in the context of the State’s planning framework, and applying

contemporary best practice in design and land management n Community purpose – If land is needed for community purposes, the retention of the land for the community in

a way that protects and facilitates the community purpose n Protection – Protection of environmentally and culturally valuable and sensitive areas and features n Consultation – Consultation with community groups, industry associations and authorities are an important part

of the decision-making process n Administration – The administration of land is consistent, impartial, efficient, open and accountable This land management plan confirms the alignment of Brisbane City Council’s proposed zipline development at Mt Coot-tha with these principles of the Land Act 1994.

1.2 Recommendations

This land management plan makes the following recommendations for the Mt Coot-tha DOGIT, Lot 2 on SP241566. It is recommended that Brisbane City Council:

1. Manage the trust land consistently with its primary purpose as a Public Park

2. Use the land management plan to guide the future development, use, maintenance and management of the DOGIT

3. Subject to relevant approvals, enter into a trustee lease with an appropriate operator of the proposed Mt

Coot-tha Zipline development, as an appropriate secondary use of the trust land a. The rental charged to the trustee lessee is to be set at a level that would effectively contribute to

the ongoing costs of maintaining the trust land b. Brisbane City Council is to retain relevant records to demonstrate that the proceeds generated

from rental charged to the trustee lessee are sufficient for the development and maintenance of the trust land or for other grouped trust land in the area

4. Monitor and revise this land management plan as required and in line with Section 12, Monitoring and Revision

2 Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy (PUX/901/209 Version 6.00 May 2017), Queensland Government, p.3


8

2 Introduction

2.1 Purpose and Goals

The purpose of this DRAFT full land management plan (LMP) is to assist and guide Brisbane City Council in its capacity as trustee in the future development, use, maintenance and management of Deed of Grant in Trust (DOGIT), Lot 2 on SP241566. The goals of the LMP are to: n Provide a framework for Brisbane City Council to inform site planning, decision-making and implementation

strategies for Lot 2 on SP241566 n Assess the suitability of the site’s proposed development, future use, management and maintenance in the

context of the trust land’s purpose and capabilities, the community’s priorities, and the Brisbane City Plan 2014 n Provide clear information to the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) on future

planned development for Lot 2 on SP241566, in line with the requirements of the Land Act 1994 n Identify and address current and future land management issues, including vegetation management, flora,

fauna, capital works, sanitation, stormwater, bushfire management, transport and parking, visual amenity and heritage

n Assist Council in the management of tenure over the subject site

2.2 Application

This LMP applies to the DOGIT land, Lot 2 on SP241566. Brisbane City Council is the trustee for this DOGIT which has an area of approximately 602.2015 ha. The land’s primary purpose is designated as Public Park.

Image 1: Aerial Map of DOGIT Lot 2 SP 241566 shown in blue outline as part of the wider of Mt Coot-tha Forest

2.3 Land Management Plan Duration

This LMP is intended to inform DNRME and to guide Council in the development, use, maintenance and management of tenure over the DOGIT for a period of 20 years (subject to the relevant approvals being obtained in 2018/2019), to 2038. This plan is designed to be an active document and is to be reviewed periodically by Brisbane City Council. Guidelines for the revision of this plan are included in Section 12, Monitoring and Revision.


9

3 Proposed Uses of the Land

Public Park will remain the primary use of the DOGIT land, Lot 2 on SP241566. It is proposed that usage of the site continue for activities which are consistent with its designated purpose. Current Public Park activities at Mt Coot-tha include bush walking, flora and fauna interpretation, mountain biking, cycling (including social cycling and organised events), hiking (including the annual Oxfam Trailwalker event), picnics, cultural heritage interpretation, heritage walks, visiting the restaurant and café, and visiting the attractions within the Botanic Gardens.

3.1 Proposed Developments

Brisbane City Council proposes to deliver the Mt Coot-tha Zipline, a low-impact, environmentally-sensitive, world-class ecotourism experience at Mt Coot-tha. According to Council, the proposed development offers a unique opportunity to capture Mt Coot-tha’s proximity to the Brisbane CBD and showcase views across the city towards Moreton Bay and beyond, and to increase appreciation and promotion of the forest landscape, natural environment and cultural heritage values of the Mt Coot-tha precinct. The Mt Coot-tha Zipline development is proposed to offer a variety of experiences that promote and celebrate Mt Coot-tha as a significant ecological, recreational and scenic asset for the city. The development would offer increased recreational and nature-based tourism experiences, whilst protecting the ecological, scenic and cultural heritage values of Mt Coot-tha and offering enhanced opportunities for community appreciation, awareness, viewing and education about this landmark. The Mt Coot-tha Zipline proposal aligns with the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Master Plan, which was taken to public consultation in 2017 and completed in June 2018. It also aligns with the following strategic planning documents: n ShapingSEQ 2017 n Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030 n Brisbane City Plan 2014 n Brisbane’s Future Blueprint n Brisbane: Clean, Green, Sustainable 2017-2031 n Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2016-2020 n Advancing Tourism 2016-2020 The Mt Coot-tha Zipline is proposed to be located on trustee leases over parts of Lot 2 on SP241566. The lease would have a total area of 15.6246 ha (5.9579 ha on-ground and 9.6667 ha volumetric above ground - see map of proposed lease areas at image 13).


10

Image 2: Ethos Urban Technical Detail Plan Mt Coot-tha Zipline

The proposal includes the establishment of an eco-tourism development offering three key experiences, namely the Scenic Zipline, Treetop Canopy Tour and Skywalk Tour, which focus on the natural environment, biodiversity, scenic amenity and recreational values of Mt Coot-tha, as well as an Arrival Centre. The zipline project would involve an Indigenous partner plan including employment and a cultural tour. Council’s descriptions of each of these proposed project elements are included below:

1 Treetop Canopy Tour

The Treetop Canopy Tour design (see Image 4 and Image 6) involves eight to nine small ziplines and platforms extending from tree to tree (or in some instances a structure) to provide a unique experience for patrons to appreciate the scenic and environmental aspects of the open forest by being elevated amongst the canopy. The alignment of the Treetop Canopy Tour has been sensitively located and designed to allow for different directional finishes (see Image 3) to avoid impacting on sensitive fauna habitats during different times of the year, particularly for the powerful owl.

2 Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline

The Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline, launching on the southern side of the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout and travelling across the eastern side of the mountain to land in the Botanic Gardens. The Scenic Zipline design incorporates a zipline experience extending from a new launch platform and publicly-accessible lookout platform near the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout to a landing platform, kiosk and viewing deck in the Botanic Gardens. A secondary structure accommodating a change in direction (the ‘intermediate tower’) for the ziplines is proposed southwest of the landing platform.

3 Mt Coot-tha Skywalk: Suspension Bridge and Cultural Heritage Tour

The Mt Coot-tha Skywalk experience design includes 321 metres of boardwalk and a 349-metre-long suspension bridge (see Image 7) above JC Slaughter Falls, which is proposed to form part of a cultural


11

heritage interpretive tour. The Skywalk tour would provide users with a link between the Treetop Canopy Tour finish and the Arrival Centre.

Arrival Centre

The arrival centre is proposed to be the ‘hub’ of the development where users of all experiences would arrive. The complex (see Image 8 and Image 9), located at the former disused Legacy Way workforce car park, is proposed to include two buildings to facilitate administration, bookings, café, toilet, gift shop, storage, induction, staff facilities and other general facilities. 102 off-street car parking spaces are proposed at the arrival centre.

Proposed non-core activities:

- Food and beverage sales at the Zipline Arrival Centre and Botanic Gardens Kiosk - Sales and promotion of other Mt Coot-tha experiences that complement and promote the area (e.g. guided

garden walks, planetarium shows, BBQ areas) - Shuttle bus transfers through Mt Coot-tha for patrons and the general public

The proposed project involves a shuttle bus service to connect the key zipline destinations, including the Arrival Centre and start and finish points of the Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline and Treetop Canopy Tour. The shuttle service would be offered to the general public as well as patrons and is intended to reduce traffic congestion and relieve impacts on existing car park facilities at Mt Coot-tha.

Image 3: Proposed Tree Top Canopy Tour


12

Image 4: Proposed Tree Top Canopy Tour - Course entry, start platform and suspension bridge

Image 5: Proposed Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline photomontage


13

Image 6: Proposed Cloud Station attachment to tree

Image 7: Proposed Suspension Bridge Schematics


14

Image 8: Proposed Zipline Arrival Centre artist’s impression

Image 9: Proposed Zipline Arrival Centre floorplan


15

Table 1: Estimated Visitor Numbers Source: Zipline Australia

Treetop Canopy Tour: Scenic Zipline: Skywalk and Cultural Heritage Tour:

Anticipated daily patronage on each of the facilities

Average: 120 Peak: circa 300

Average: 330 Peak: circa 800 - 1,000

Average: 525 Peak: 1,200 - 1,500

Maximum number of patrons and staff that would be

participating in each of the facilities at any one time

Max. patrons on tour: 48 Max. guides on tour: 12

Max. patrons on tour: 10-12 Max. guides on tour: 10

Max. patrons on tour: 150 Max. guides on tour: 6 (positioned rangers)

Approximate duration of a “trip” on each of the facilities

Ticketing to leaving: 90 - 120 minutes

Ticketing to leaving: 45 minutes

Ticketing to leaving: 60-80 minutes


16

4 Legislative and Policy Context

The DRAFT LMP for the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline has been developed in accordance with: n Land Management Planning Information Kit Version 9 n Land Act 1994 and Land Regulation 2009 n Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy (State Land Asset Management No. PUX/901/209 SLM/2013/493 Version

6.00, 2017) n City of Brisbane Act 2010 and City of Brisbane Regulation 2012 n Brisbane City Plan 2014 n Vegetation Management Act 1999 n Queensland Heritage Act 1992 n Brisbane City Council Corporate Plan 2016-17 to 2020-21 and Brisbane Vision 2031Brisbane City Council

Sustainable Built Environment Policy (adopted March 2007) n Brisbane: Clean, Green, Sustainable 2017-2031 n Brisbane City Council Local Laws n Advancing Tourism 2016-2020 n Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2016-2020 n Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030 n ShapingSEQ 2017 n State Planning Policy July 2017

4.1 Land Management Planning Information Kit

This LMP has been prepared in accordance with Version 9 of DNRME’s Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust.

4.2 Land Act 1994 and Land Regulation 2009

Community purpose trust land held in trust by Brisbane City Council is subject to the provisions of the Land Act 1994 and the Land Regulation 2009. The purpose of the Land Act 1994 is to “…consolidate and amend the law relating to the administration and management of non-freehold land and deeds of grant in trust and the creation of freehold land, and for related purposes.”3 The Land Act 1994 outlines relevant state government provisions relating to trustee leasing. The Act specifies that the trustee's functions are to: n Manage the trust land consistent with achieving the purpose of the trust n Fulfil the trust within the conditions of appointment (if any) n Control noxious plants on the trust land n Keep records required by the Minister or required under this and other Acts n Be responsible for a duty of care for the trust land This LMP has been prepared in accordance with Section 48(1)(a) of the Land Act 1994.

4.3 Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy

The DNRME Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy (PUX/901/209 Version 6.00 May 2017) is a relevant reference in this case, written to support the trustee leasing provisions of the Land Act 1994.

3 Land Act 1994 (Queensland), Queensland Government


17

The policy supports the trustee leasing provisions of the Land Act 1994 and provides guidance on a trustee's use of trust land for any approved uses that are inconsistent with the purpose of the trust land. The policy confirms that a trustee may only authorise secondary use of trust land under a trustee lease or trustee permit. The policy seeks to improve the management of trust land by: n Providing guidance to trustees of trust land on the circumstances in which management plans are required n Allowing trustees to adopt a flexible approach to management planning in appropriate circumstances n Simplifying trustee lease approval processes n Enabling local governments who are trustees to approve the placement of appropriate infrastructure and

specialised services on trust land n Providing trustees with greater opportunity to generate lease revenue from trust land for reinvestment in trust

land management and maintenance n Ensuring that uses of trust land containing a commercial element are appropriately managed n Providing guidance on the appropriate charging of rental for secondary uses of trust land n Providing guidance to trustees of trust land on the circumstances in which access to trust land for traditional

Indigenous activities as a secondary use may be considered The Land Act 1994 provides for a maximum term for trustee leases and trustee subleases of 30 years. The Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy limits trustee leases for sporting clubs or for charitable purposes to a maximum term of 20 years, unless otherwise approved by the Minister. Brisbane City Council has shared its opinion with the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy that the proposed secondary use of the subject site for the development and operation of the Mt Coot-tha Zipline is appropriate and consistent with the Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy, especially considering that the DOGIT currently supports other pre-existing secondary uses, including parts of the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha, and the use of part of the site for the Mt Coot-tha Quarry.

4.4 City of Brisbane Act 2010 and City of Brisbane Regulation 2012

The purpose of the City of Brisbane Act 2010 is to provide a system of local government in the City of Brisbane. The Act provides for the way in which Brisbane City Council is constituted and governed and the nature and extent of Council’s responsibilities and powers. The City of Brisbane Act 2010 and the City of Brisbane Regulation 2012 form part of the legislative context for this LMP as the trust land falls within the boundaries of the City of Brisbane as defined in the Act and Regulation.

4.5 Brisbane City Plan 2014

Brisbane City Plan 2014 is Brisbane City’s planning scheme and represents Council's plan for the future development of the city over the next 20 years. The plan guides how land in Brisbane can be used and developed. The planning scheme was prepared in accordance with the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. Brisbane City Plan 2014 includes details of each property within the city, including zoning, zone precincts, neighbourhood plan areas and overlays that affect each site. Zones organise the planning scheme area in a way that facilitates the location of preferred or acceptable land uses. Table 6.2.1 in the plan, Zone Codes, provides information on the purpose of each zone code and the overall outcomes that achieve the purpose of the code. The following zone codes from the planning scheme apply to Mt Coot-tha: Lot 2 on SP241566: n OS3 Open Space (Metropolitan) Zone n CN3 Conservation (Metropolitan) Zone The following overlays from the planning scheme apply to Lot 2 on SP241566:


18

n Airport environs overlay n Procedures for air navigation surfaces (PANS) n BBS zone – distance from airport 8-13km n Bicycle network overlay n Biodiversity areas overlay n Biodiversity areas overlay high ecological significance subcategory n Bushfire overlay n Bushfire overlay high hazard area subcategory n Critical infrastructure and movement network overlay n Critical infrastructure and movement planning area sub-category n Extractive resources overlay n Key resource area separation area sub-category n Flood overlay n Heritage overlay n State heritage place sub-category n Local heritage place sub-category n Landslide overlay n Road hierarchy overlay n Streetscape hierarchy overlay n Waterway corridors overlay n Citywide waterway corridor sub-category n Local waterway corridor sub-category The following neighbourhood plans from the planning scheme apply to Lot 2 on SP241566: n Mt Coot-tha Neighbourhood Plan

4.6 Vegetation Management Act 1999

The Queensland Government Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy provides regulated vegetation management mapping and mapping for regional ecosystems and essential habitats under the Vegetation Management Act 1999.

4.6.1 Vegetation Categories

The clearing of native vegetation in Queensland is regulated by the Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VMA), the Planning Act 2016 and associated policies and codes. The vegetation categories that are present on the property are described in the map and table below.

Image 10: Figure 1: Regulated vegetation map for Lot 2 SP2415664

4 Regulated Vegetation Management Map, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, 2018


19

Table 2: Vegetation present at the subject site at Mt Coot-tha Category Colour on Map Description Requirements B Dark blue Remnant vegetation

areas Clearing requires a development approval, exemption, or self-assessable clearing code or area management plan notification

C Light blue High value regrowth vegetation

Clearing or managing Category C regrowth vegetation requires an exemption or self-assessable clearing code

X White Areas not regulated under the Vegetation Management Act 1999

No permit or notification required on all but certain state land tenures

4.6.2 Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV)

There is no property map of assessable vegetation (PMAV) certified on the subject land.

4.6.3 Wetlands

There are no vegetation management wetlands present on the subject site.

4.6.4 Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3 Key Findings

Cardno was commissioned by Brisbane City Council to complete an ecological assessment for the proposed Zipline project at Mt Coot-tha. The resulting report documents the findings of desktop and field ecological assessments completed at Mt Coot-tha and the Mt Coot-tha Botanic Gardens. This includes the findings of the detailed ecological assessment completed within the proposed development footprint and surrounds between 27 February 2018 and 27 March 2018. An impact assessment was also completed for the project to identify risks to ecological features during construction and operation of the project, and to suggest appropriate management measures, to avoid, minimise and mitigate impacts. The project aims to minimise impacts through design and has sought to avoid the clearing of native vegetation as far as practical. The key findings of the assessment are listed below5: n Impacts to koala habitat do not constitute a significant impact as per the Commonwealth Department of

Environment and Energy Significant Impact Guidelines n Impacts to the greater glider habitat do not constitute a significant impact as per the Commonwealth

Department of Environment and Energy Significant Impact Guidelines n The project has been specifically designed to avoid nesting habitat of the powerful owl by providing a wide

buffer to the known nest tree and including an alternative zipline route which increases the buffer during breeding season. Night time zipline activity on the Treetop Canopy Tour would not occur

n Slender milkvine occurs at a number of locations within the study area but none would be directly impacted by the project. A protected plants clearing permit and impact management plan would be required for clearing supporting habitat within 100m of this species in accordance with Flora Survey Guidelines – Protected Plants, Nature Conservation Act

n The extent of impact on areas of high ecological significance as mapped in the Biodiversity Areas Overlay map of the planning scheme is 1.947ha

n Clearing associated with the project is limited and in most instances results in retention of the canopy or the temporary clearing to facilitate construction. Consequently, while the project would result in the clearing of 1.266ha of ground truthed Category B regulated vegetation in addition to 124 scattered trees, the overall structure and function of the ecosystem would be maintained. The clearing only represents ~0.1% of all remnant vegetation on the site

n The project would result in the loss of 21 known hollow-bearing trees (accounting for ~41 individual hollows) and 7 suspected hollow-bearing trees (accounting for ~13 suspected individual hollows). Furthermore, additional hollows may be impacted in retained trees that are subject to pruning. These hollows would be relocated, and/or offset through the provision of nest boxes. The project would therefore require an approved Species Management Program under the Nature Conservation Act 1992

n The Treetop Canopy Tour is located more than 100m from the Powerful Owl nest tree (Helicopter Restriction Zone), achieving the recommended buffer distance to assist in mitigating noise impacts

5 Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3, Prepared by Cardno, 2018


20

n The noise arising from use of the zipline (i.e. excited patrons; rollers on the zip cable) would be relatively benign and consistent compared to other noises that might be expected in an urban environment and would have been considered when a 100m buffer to the nest tree was recommended

n Maintenance on zip run 7-8 in the Treetop Canopy Tour is considered to be minor and acceptable for the Powerful Owl, even during the identified period of sensitivity (May to September) at the nest tree if the transit is done at speeds reflective of maintenance works (slow and methodical)

n The Helicopter Restriction Zone recommended in 28South’s Initial Advice lodged with the development application on 3 September 2018 remains but has an amended boundary to provide a reasonable separation to the nest tree and refuge gully and a lower operational limit for helicopter activity of 1,400ft above ground level

n The proposed kiosk in the Botanic Gardens extends into the Tree Protection Zone of an adjacent tree. In response to these concerns, Independent Arboricultural Services (IAS) has prepared a Tree Protection Plan to protect the retained tree during construction works

4.7 Queensland Heritage Act 1992

The Queensland Heritage Act 1992 states that a place may be entered in the Queensland heritage register (QHR) as a State heritage place if it satisfies one or more of eight specific criteria. Table 3 below identifies the heritage criteria that are relevant to the subject site. Table 3: Heritage Significance of Mt Coot-tha

Criterion Description of Heritage Criterion

Significance of Mt Coot-tha

A The place is important in demonstrating the evolution or pattern of Queensland’s history.

Mt Coot-tha is an early example of the importance that the Queensland public placed upon recreational, scenic and environmental values. It has been used as a vantage point since the first recorded European ascent of Mt Coot-tha in 1828. Since then, the growing popularity of visiting the summit has reflected the emergence of leisure and recreation time for the general populace, and the advent and popularity of the motor car. The area has been continually used and enjoyed by the public since the early development of Brisbane. It is also important for demonstrating a range of different land uses such as a reference point for surveying, timber reserve, gold mining and military activities that are representative of Queensland history while retaining its original values.

B The place demonstrates rare, uncommon or endangered aspects of Queensland’s cultural heritage.

The remnants of gold mining in Mt Coot-tha represent a now uncommon aspect of Queensland's history. While gold prospecting was once a common way of life in Queensland, the proximity of gold prospecting activity so close to Brisbane is uncommon. These remnants are the only physical evidence left of the attempts to establish a fledgling gold industry at Mt Coot-tha.

C The place has potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of Queensland’s history.

The remnants of gold mining activity have the potential to yield information about the nature and scope of the activities that took place in Mt Coot-tha which will contribute to an understanding of how the area was used over time.

E The place is important because of its aesthetic significance.

Mt Coot-tha is important because of its aesthetic significance as a prominent scenic and landmark element in the cityscape and affords spectacular views in all directions.

G The place has a strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or spiritual reasons.

The recreational, scenic and environmental attributes of Mt Coot-tha have been valued by the people of Brisbane since the early days of European settlement. The use of the area for leisure activities was strengthened with the legislation of the Saturday half day holiday in 1900 which heralded the beginning of the traditional weekend. The picnic areas and walking tracks are evidence of the continuity of recreational activities at Mt Coot-tha since the late 1800s to the present and the area is popular with different recreational groups including scouts, bushwalkers, runners and Mountain bike riders.

H The place has a special association with the life or work of a particular person, group or organisation of importance in Queensland’s history.

Mt Coot-tha has strong association with former Queensland Premiers Sir Samuel Griffith, who was a trustee, and Sir William Jolly who, through his administration in the mid 1920s, was instrumental in maintaining and expanding Mt Coot-tha and played an important role in ensuring the area


21

Criterion Description of Heritage Criterion

Significance of Mt Coot-tha

was preserved for the enjoyment of the Queensland public into the future.

During the time that this LMP was prepared, Brisbane City Council commissioned a Heritage Impact Statement from Urbis to assess the proposed project’s impact on Mt Coot-tha. The study reported that the development of the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project would have a minimal impact on the cultural heritage significance of the relevant Heritage Places. Table 4 below details the assessment of the historical impact of each section of the proposed development on the Mt Coot-tha site. Table 4 Historical Impact Assessment6

Components of Proposed Project

Historical impact assessment

Scenic Zipline

The Zipline proposal includes a launch area and new public viewing platform to the southern side of the lookout. The view from the lookout in the direction of the proposed platform is towards the Border Ranges and is not within the view towards the Brisbane CBD. The proposed level of the platform has been lowered to minimise its impact on the view towards the ranges. Some trees would need to be removed to provide for the access to this platform and for the finish station, and others would need to be trimmed to provide for the Zipline corridor. However, the extent of vegetation removal is limited to a total of 1.947 ha, including 0.76 ha for built infrastructure, 0.109 ha for boardwalks (with canopy retained), 0.221 ha temporary clearing for construction (with canopy retained), 0.939 ha for fire management (with canopy retained), 0.579 ha for the catenary and 0.022 ha for roadworks. Pedestrian access is from the rear carpark to the north of the lookout. The proposed finish station of the Zipline is within the Botanic Gardens. This section of the gardens is within the QHR Heritage Boundary of Mt Coot-tha, but the gardens are not referenced in that QHR entry as contributing to the significance of the place.

Treetop Canopy Tour

The Treetop Canopy Tour is proposed to run from the west of the lookout and down towards JC Slaughter Falls to the north. The Treetop Canopy Tour design includes a small start kiosk and a number of Cloud Stations which are to be carefully fixed to the trees, minimising their impact.

Suspension Bridge

The Suspension Bridge is proposed to run from ridge to ridge, straddling the creek gully where the World War II (WWII) remnants are located. The bridge and associated cultural heritage tour would have no impact on the WWII remnants and would provide an opportunity for additional interpretation of this part of the place’s history.

Arrival Centre The Arrival Centre is proposed to be located in an existing paved carpark and would have no impact on the significance of the place.

Impact during construction phase

The impact of the construction phase of the project would be minimal. Existing trails provide access to most of the proposed areas of construction and some structural elements would be lowered in by helicopter. Several new service trenches would need to be constructed for the Arrival Centre and the Treetops Tour start kiosk. The archaeological potential in the areas where the Zipline is proposed is considered to be low. The identified gold mining remnants are on the western side of the forest, well away from these proposed works. The WWII remnants are below the Suspension Bridge and would not be impacted by the proposal. Developing a Chance Finds procedure in case archaeological resources are uncovered is recommended.

6 Mt Coot-tha Ziplines Heritage Impact Statement, Urbis, Prepared May 2018


22

Image 11: Heritage Register Number: 602446 Mt Coot-tha Boundary Map

In addition to the findings of the Heritage Impact Statement, above, the Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Turrbal Historical and Cultural Analysis) concluded that the Turrbal Association has no objection to the proposed project on the condition that Brisbane City Council adheres to the report’s recommendations.

4.8 Brisbane City Council Corporate Plan 2016-2017 to 2020-21 and Brisbane Vision 2031

Brisbane City Council’s corporate plan is the medium-term plan towards achieving the Brisbane Vision 2031. Brisbane Vision 2031 is Council’s long-term community plan for the city. The effective ongoing management of recreation reserves in the city will help to achieve the ‘Our Active, Healthy City’, ‘Our New World City’, ‘Our well-designed sub-tropical City’ and ‘Our Clean, Green City’ themes of the vision: n Our active, healthy city: Brisbane has active and healthy communities and offers diverse and accessible

recreational opportunities for all ages, abilities and backgrounds n Our clean, green city: Subtropical open spaces and natural areas provide breathing spaces for the city. Our

river, creeks and bay are enhanced, protected and enjoyed by all n Our New World City: Brisbane is regarded as a top 10 lifestyle city worldwide. Students, businesses,

researchers, innovators and entrepreneurs from all over the world want to live, study and work here. Community, business and political leaders work together to seek economic, social, infrastructure and environmental opportunities for the city and the region, both at home and internationally

n Our well-designed, subtropical city: Brisbane is a well-designed, outdoor-living city. The design of our buildings and spaces maximise the region’s climate and lifestyle attributes. Planning and development in our city prepares effectively for population and employment growth and demographic change

The revitalisation of Mt Coot-tha, incorporating the zipline project is a high priority for Brisbane City Council as evidenced in the Corporate Plan’s ‘Creating new lifestyle and leisure opportunities’ objective and the ‘Clean, Green and Sustainable City Program’ Pillar:


23

4.9 Brisbane City Council Sustainable Built Environment Policy

The Brisbane City Council Sustainable Built Environment Policy (adopted March 2007) expands on Council’s vision for the future as articulated in the corporate plan and demonstrates Council’s commitment to using a structured approach to driving sustainable development. The objectives of the policy that relate to this LMP are: n Design and construct the built environment in a way that promotes eco-efficiencies, such as minimising energy

and water use and improving resource life cycles (reuse and recycling) n Plan, design and construct our surroundings to enhance urban form and positively contribute to the sustainable

management of air quality, vegetation, land, energy and water n Manage, protect and enhance our natural ecosystems and green space network, through sensitive design of

the built environment n Encourage green transport (public transport, bikeways and walkways) and an active lifestyle for residents and

visitors Relevant actions to which Council is committed in the implementation of the policy include: n Encourage owners/managers to upgrade the sustainability performance of any buildings Council leases,

including any new developments n Review Council’s future community leases and affordable housing programs in the context of sustainable

development In implementing this LMP, Council should ensure that trustee lessees of the trust land adhere to sustainability measures in the development and ongoing management of the zipline project in accordance with the Sustainable Built Environment Policy.

4.10 Brisbane: Clean, Green, Sustainable 2017-2031

Brisbane has earned the reputation as one of the world’s most liveable and healthy cities, with Keep Australia Beautiful naming it Australia’s Most Sustainable City in 2014 and 2016. Brisbane: Clean, Green Sustainable 2017-2031 celebrates these achievements and sets out the goals to keep Brisbane at the leading edge of city sustainability.

Creating new lifestyle and leisure opportunities

A liveable city is about more than just new jobs and better roads. More leisure options mean exciting events and vibrant local markets, with better facilities and venues for all ages to enjoy.

Making Mt Coot-tha a leisure and adventure precinct with a new zipline, picnic areas and walking trails.

3. Clean, Green and Sustainable City

Program

• Brisbane City Council Corporate Plan 2016-2017-2020-2021

3.2 Low Carbon and Clean Environment

• Council will continue to manage our environmental performance and aim for consistently clean, healthy air throughout the city

Medium Term Objective

• Brisbane’s parks are upgraded to a standard that reflects community expectations

Key Action

• Deliver the Mt Coot-tha Enhancement program, including new walking trails, major upgrades to Simpson Falls and JC Slaughter Falls, and partnering with the private sector to deliver a zipline


24

Council’s sustainability commitments include practical actions to reach its goals under nine themes: n Low Carbon n Clean Air n Green Transport n Waste and Resource Recovery n WaterSmart City n Sustainable CityShape n Urban Forest n Parks n Biodiversity The following table describes the goals and strategies that are relevant to this LMP.

FOCUS: PARKS Goal: Brisbane Parks are diverse and accessible

Targets • Maintain community satisfaction with all parks above 85% • 50% of Brisbane’s district-level parks meet accessibility and inclusion standards

Priority Actions

1. Enhance the park network to respond to a growing and changing Brisbane • Develop new recreation parks and facilities as focal points for the community such as the Mt Coot-tha

precinct, Indooroopilly (Witton Barracks), and a new, upgraded wetland environment centre at Boondall.

3. Promote Brisbane worldwide as a city with an enviable year-round, vibrant, outdoor lifestyle. • Promote the culture of Brisbane’s dynamic and diverse parks as places where something is

happening day and night. • Promote the breadth of sustainable recreation possible in natural area parks, both in peaceful spaces

or active, social areas. 4. Encourage communities to embrace Brisbane’s parks and public spaces.

• Continue to work with other levels of government to ensure sound management of reserves and trust land and for negotiated use rights.

Landmark project: Mt Coot-tha Precinct

This vision celebrates Mt Coot-tha as: • a Brisbane icon • a sustainable retreat for people and refuge for wildlife • a learning environment • a place for recreation • a place that is connected and accessible Enhancements planned for the Mt Coot-tha precinct include: • a new master plan for the Brisbane Botanic Gardens at Mt Coot-tha • a new visitor information centre and zipline attraction • upgrading the JC Slaughter Falls and Simpson Falls picnic areas and building a new trail to connect them • upgrades and improvements to existing facilities and creation of new trails

4.11 Brisbane City Council Local Laws

Under the City of Brisbane Act 2010, Brisbane City Council may make and enforce any local law that is necessary or convenient for the good rule and local government of Brisbane7. The following local laws relate to this LMP: n Natural Assets Local Law 2003

- The purpose of the Natural Assets Local Law is to protect the biodiversity values of the city including, but not limited to, the habitat and ecological requirements of native flora and fauna; to preserve natural landforms; to facilitate the retention of the landscape character of the City; to facilitate the retention of the historical and cultural values of the City by restricting indiscriminate clearing of vegetation; to control hazardous vegetation; and to control and manage pest vegetation

n Health, Safety and Amenity Local Law 2009 7 Register of Local Laws, Brisbane City Council, 31 May 2018, available online: http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/laws-permits/local-laws/register-local-laws-notices


25

- To protect standards of community health and safety, and to enhance local amenities n Public Land and Council Assets Local Law 2014

- The purpose of the Public Land and Council Assets Local Law is to: a. provide for the management and regulation of activities in or on:

i. Council parks, open spaces, bushland and conservation areas; and ii. malls in the City; and iii. roads; and iv. other Council assets;

b. optimise the benefit derived by the public from that land; and c. protect Council assets; and d. provide for Council consent to be required for certain activities; and e. provide a procedure for the removal or confiscation of articles or vehicles situated on Council

assets contrary to this or another law, and the storage, return or disposal of those articles or vehicles.

4.12 Advancing Tourism 2016-2020

The Queensland Government believes that tourism is vital to Queensland’s economy as it creates jobs, attracts investment and sustains communities. Developed by the Department of Tourism, Major Events, Small Business and the Commonwealth Games, the document Advancing Tourism 2016-2020 is the government’s plan to capitalise on the significant tourism growth in Queensland. The document includes key areas, identified by industry, to increase market share and boost tourism jobs. The following strategic priorities apply to this LMP:

Strategic Priority Objectives Strategies

1. Grow quality products, events and experiences

Develop high quality, innovative products and experiences

• Support the inclusion of premium experiences that attract high-yield visitors as part of new or existing tourism developments, such as integrated resort developments.

• Facilitate the development of new products and experiences that meet the expectations of target markets.

Develop new and refreshed ecotourism, nature-based and cultural heritage products and experiences

• Encourage the development of Indigenous, cultural and heritage tourism products across the state.

2. Invest in infrastructure and access

Position Queensland as a leading destination for tourism infrastructure investment

• Invest in public infrastructure that benefits the broader visitor economy, including arts and cultural facilities and precincts, visitor information facilities, protected areas, visitor infrastructure and sporting infrastructure.

• Deliver a strong pipeline of private tourism development projects and target delivery of new tourism Infrastructure throughout Queensland, including hotels, attractions, access infrastructure, ecotourism and island developments.

4.13 Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2016-2020

The Queensland Government is committed to building Queensland’s reputation as a tourism destination focussed on conservation of our diverse landscape, unique natural wonders and significant cultural heritage. Developed by Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of National Parks, Sport and Racing, The Queensland Ecotourism Plan 2016-2020 sets out the Queensland Government’s vision to support sustainable growth, protect the environment and deliver new ecotourism experiences for visitors.


26

The plan outlines five strategic directions:

1. Driving innovation in ecotourism experiences 2. Showcasing the world-renowned Great Barrier Reef 3. Stimulating investment in new and refurbished ecotourism opportunities 4. Expanding authentic Indigenous ecotourism experiences 5. Promoting Queensland’s world-class ecotourism experiences

The following strategic priorities apply to this LMP:

Strategic Priority Objectives

1. Driving innovation in ecotourism experiences 1.7 Progress best practice, low impact ecotourism investment opportunities.

3. Stimulating investment in new and refurbished ecotourism opportunities

3.3 Develop a portfolio of high quality ecotourism investment projects located on state and other freehold land that demonstrate strong business cases and local support.

3.5 Implement best practice approaches and certification programs (where appropriate) to ensure protection and sustainable use of Queensland’s special natural areas.

3.6 Ensure tourism interests are considered in future reviews of wildlife management regulations and processes.

4. Expanding authentic Indigenous ecotourism experiences

4.1 Work with existing and potential Indigenous ecotourism product to ensure long-term sustainability.

4.3 Identify new Indigenous ecotourism opportunities in and adjacent to Queensland’s national parks, including jointly managed national parks.

4.14 Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030

Brisbane City Council worked with residents and visitors to create a 20-year vision for the Mt Coot-tha precinct. The gathering and understanding of the values, memories, ideas and aspirations for the area is expected to help shape and enhance the uses, places and experiences for generations to come.

This LMP demonstrates the proposed project’s alignment with the five themes of Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030 which are detailed below: Five main themes for Mt Coot-tha:

1. A Brisbane Icon 2. A Sustainable Retreat and Refuge 3. A Learning Environment 4. A Place for Recreation 5. A Place that is Connected and Accessible

4.15 ShapingSEQ 2017

ShapingSEQ is the Queensland Government’s long-term plan that will shape South East Queensland (SEQ) over the next 20 years. Prepared in collaboration with the region’s 12 local governments, the plan draws inspiration from the community. Since 2009, a number of megatrends have emerged in a rapidly changing world – megatrends that will influence how we live, work and connect. ShapingSEQ responds to these trends and the dynamic nature

The vision To embrace Mt Coot-tha as an iconic green landmark for the City of Brisbane. Mt Coot-tha will be valued for its unique environmental, cultural and historical qualities, and be celebrated for its biodiversity, diverse learning and recreational experiences and opportunities.


27

of our changing region. The plan also builds on the foundations of previous regional plans to positions SEQ for ongoing sustainable growth, global competitiveness and high-quality living. The plan has 5 goals:

1. Grow 2. Prosper 3. Connect 4. Sustain 5. Live

The goals that apply to this LMP are:

Goals Elements Strategies Goal 2: PROSPER

Tourism

• Build upon the region’s international brand to promote tourism opportunities that will enhance economic, environmental, social and cultural benefits

• Plan for socially and environmentally sustainable tourism and recreational activities in rural areas

• Facilitate tourism opportunities by enhancing enabling infrastructure and services, particularly airports, major roads and rail, and digital technology

Goal 4: SUSTAIN

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People

• Recognise and reflect the economic and social needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in land use planning through consultation and engagement with those communities

• Recognise and reflect the procedural rights of Traditional Owners to be consulted at the outset and involved in land use planning for matters that may affect their rights

• Engage Traditional Owners to enable their cultural knowledge and connection to land and seascapes to be included in planning for communities and the sustainable management of cultural and natural resources

Biodiversity

• Protect regional biodiversity values, and the ecological processes that support them, from inappropriate development

• Maintain and enhance the value and connectivity of regional biodiversity corridors to optimise biodiversity conservation outcomes

• Avoid fragmentation of regional biodiversity corridors and rehabilitate degraded areas to maintain habitat and support fauna movement

Regional Landscapes

• Protect and rehabilitate culturally significant places in the regional landscape • Protect regional scenic amenity areas from development that would

compromise their value • Protect and enhance the regional greenspace network, including through

innovative approaches, to meet the recreational and outdoor needs of the community

Health and Wellbeing • Ensure that all communities have adequate and appropriate social infrastructure

• Ensure the community has adequate access to sport and recreation opportunities that use the region’s natural assets sustainably and do not compromise the region’s biodiversity values

Goal 5: LIVE

Inspiration from Local Character

• Work respectfully with natural topography to create development that contributes positively to the environmental and visual experience of a place

• Work with the characteristics, traditions and values of the local community to create a distinctive local character and contributory community value

Working with natural systems

• Conserve and protect significant trees, plants of scale and significant species, as valuable community assets and use these features to enhance local character

The Mt Coot-tha area can be classed as an area with the following Regional Landscape Values: n Scenic Amenity: Landscape areas identified as having scenic amenity value

- Benefits: Physical and mental health and wellbeing, tourism, sense of place and community cohesion


28

n Culturally significant places: Places which are important for preserving for non-Indigenous sociocultural and historic connections. Including those listed on the Queensland Heritage Register and considered under the State Planning Policy (SPP)

n Regional greenspace networks: Publicly owned or managed land that the community generally has a legal right to access. Regional recreation trails also form part of the regional greenspace network. Trails can offer excellent recreation opportunities to families, bicycle tourists, mountain bike riders, historical enthusiasts, horse riders and walkers - Benefits: Improved community health and wellbeing through physical activity, direct experience of

landscapes and nature, social interaction, increased employment and liveability

The Mt Coot-tha area can be classed as an area with the following Regional Biodiversity Values: n Areas of ecosystem representation and uniqueness: Areas that support a broad representation of the region’s

ecosystems, all with their own different set of functions that contribute to overall regional biodiversity - Benefits: Resilience and economic opportunities for tourism and pharmaceutical and other industries

n Vegetation that allows for the interaction between large intact areas - Benefits: Allows for movement, breeding opportunities and genetic diversity of the fauna and flora within

the large intact areas. Includes proximity and stepping stone vegetation There are outcomes listed in the plan that directly mention Mt Coot-tha. These include:

4.16 State Planning Policy July 2017

The State Planning Policy (SPP) is a key component of Queensland’s Planning system. The SPP expresses the state’s interests in land use planning and development. A state interest is defined under the Planning Act 2016 as an interest that the Planning Minister considers: n Affects economical or environmental interest of the state or part of the state n Affects the interest of ensuring that the purpose of the Planning Act is achieved The Planning Regulation 2017 defines the state’s role in development assessment. The State Development Assessment Provisions are the assessment benchmarks used by the state in its role as assessment manager or referral agency for development applications which affect a state interest. The Planning Act provides for a performance-based approach to planning in Queensland. The SPP has effect throughout Queensland and sits above regional plans and planning schemes in the hierarchy of planning instruments under the Planning Act. The state interests expressed in the SPP consist of:

Outcomes for Goal 4: SUSTAIN

• The intent to protect and nurture the regional biodiversity network and manage regional landscapes will be particularly relevant to the following locations:

• Mt Coot-tha–Blackall Range Corridor, which links Mt Coot-tha, D’Aguilar (South)/Bunyaville Conservation Park, D’Aguilar National Park including Mt Glorious, Somerset Dam precinct, Wivenhoe Dam precinct and north to the Blackall Range

Outcomes for Goal 5: LIVE

• Developing and promoting great places will support the sub-region’s liveability, prosperity and sense of identity and community. Current and evolving great places identified by local governments in the Metro sub-region include:

• Brisbane’s identity as a great place overall, complementing place-making initiatives with drawcards like the Brisbane River, Mt Coot-tha, Brisbane Forest Park, Moreton Bay/ Tangalooma, Shorncliffe Pier, Lone Pine Koala Sanctuary and Boondall Wetlands


29

n A state interest statement n State interest policies n Assessment benchmarks, where applicable The state interests that are relevant to the Mt Coot-tha project are:

Interest Statement Interest Policies LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES Liveable, well-designed and serviced communities are delivered to support wellbeing and enhance quality of life.

2) Vibrant places and spaces, and diverse communities that meet lifestyle needs are facilitated by: b) a mix of land uses that meet the diverse demographic, social, cultural,

economic and lifestyle needs of the community f) supporting a range of formal and informal sporting, recreational and

community activities 3) Development is designed to:

a) value and nurture local landscape character and the natural environment b) maintain or enhance important cultural landscapes and areas of high

scenic amenity, including important views and vistas that contribute to natural and visual amenity

c) maintain or enhance opportunities for public access and use of the natural environment

TOURISM Tourism planning and development opportunities that are appropriate and sustainable are supported, and the social, cultural and natural values underpinning tourism developments are protected.

1) Existing and potential opportunities, localities or areas appropriate for tourism development are identified and protected.

2) The delivery of sustainable tourism development is facilitated where it: a) is complementary to and compatible with other land uses, including

sensitive land uses. b) promotes the protection or enhancement of the character, landscape

and visual amenity, and the economic, social, cultural and environmental values of the natural and built assets associated with the tourism development.

3) Appropriate infrastructure to support and enable tourism development is planned for.

BIODIVERSITY Matters of environmental significance are valued and protected, and the health and resilience of biodiversity is maintained or enhanced to support ecological processes.

1) Development is located in areas to avoid significant impacts on matters of national environmental significance and considers the requirements of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

2) Matters of state environmental significance are identified and development is located in areas that avoid adverse impacts; where adverse impacts cannot be reasonably avoided, they are minimised.

3) Matters of local environmental significance are identified and development is located in areas that avoid adverse impacts; where adverse impacts cannot be reasonably avoided, they are minimised.

4) Ecological processes and connectivity is maintained or enhanced by avoiding fragmentation of matters of environmental significance.

5) Viable koala populations in South East Queensland are protected by conserving and enhancing koala habitat extent and condition.

CULTURAL HERITAGE The cultural heritage significance of heritage places and heritage areas, including places of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, is conserved for the benefit of the community and future generations.

1) Matters of Aboriginal cultural heritage and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage are appropriately conserved and considered to support the requirements of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 and the Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage Act 2003.

4) Local heritage places and local heritage areas important to the history of the local government area are identified, including a statement of the local cultural heritage significance of the place or area.

5) Development of local heritage places or local heritage areas does not compromise the cultural heritage significance of the place or area by: a) avoiding adverse impacts on the cultural heritage significance of the

place or area; or b) minimising and mitigating unavoidable adverse impacts on the cultural

heritage significance of the place or area. 6) The conservation and adaptive reuse of local heritage places and local

heritage areas are facilitated so that the cultural heritage significance is retained.


30

5 Trustee Details

Brisbane City Council is trustee for the DOGIT that is the subject of this LMP. Council manages the land in accordance with the Public Park primary purpose of the trust land. The contact details in relation to the management of the trust land and secondary uses (leases, permits and licences) are:

Branch Manager Natural Environment, Water and Sustainability Branch Brisbane City Council GPO Box 1434 BRISBANE QLD 4001 Phone: (07) 3403 8888


31

6 Existing Tenure of the Subject Land

Site Name Mt Coot-tha

Deed of Grant in Trust No. 11888208

Address 200 Sir Samuel Griffith Drive, Mt Coot-tha, QLD, 4066

Lot and Plan Lot 2 on SP241566

Local Government Brisbane City Council

Bioregion Southeast Queensland

Subregion Burringbar – Conondale Ranges

Catchment Brisbane

State Development Assessment Provisions Coastal

Area of Land 602.2015 ha

DNRME Designation Public Park

Zoning n OS3 Open Space (Metropolitan) Zone n CN3 Conservation (Metropolitan) Zone


32

7 Description of the Subject Land

7.1 History 8 9 10

Mt Coot-tha is 287m above sea level and forms part of the Taylor Range. It has been used for walking and recreation from the 1860s. In 1880 the site was declared a public recreation reserve of approximately 1,500 acres, enclosing the headwaters of East Ithaca Creek. The original purpose for the DOGIT was “public park for the recreation, convenience, health and amusement of the inhabitants of the City of Brisbane”11 At this point it was known as One Tree Hill due to the fact that prior to the declaration as public recreation reserve deforestation had apparently taken all but one eucalypt from the summit. Following the declaration, the trustees of the reserve renamed it Mt Coot-tha, an aboriginal word meaning 'place of honey'. The mountain was said to be given this name as the Aboriginal people of the area used to come to the mountain to collect ‘cu-ta’ (honey) which was produced by the native stingless bee12. A walking track was developed for visitors that led from the Toowong cemetery site to Mt Coot-tha (287m), Constitution Hill (217m) and later further west. This track was later widened for buggies and renamed Coronation Drive, and later still Sir Samuel Griffith Drive (named after an early trustee). The early infrastructure included an elementary kiosk and shelter shed at the summit. The site was put under the management of Toowong Town Council in 1918 and Brisbane City Council upon municipal amalgamation in 1925. During this time the reserve and the kiosk were upgraded and enlarged. Mt Coot-tha soon developed into a favourite picnic and recreation area for Brisbane residents, offering sweeping views of the city, Moreton Bay, Stradbroke Island, and the southern ranges. Gold was prospected and mined at Mt Coot-tha intermittently from 1890-1950. The ore quality was very low and only small amounts of gold were extracted. During World War II the reserve became a military base and served as a mine storage and assembly depot. The Mt Coot-tha Quarry has been operational since 1919 and is a highly regarded resource point for blue-grey rock for road and building purposes13. The quarry itself sits on approximately 30 hectares. In 1960, television towers were built at the site and the 1970s saw the establishment of the planetarium and the original botanic garden. JC Slaughter Falls, on East Ithaca Creek, are on a site that was once filled by two dams. In around 1913, the falls were named after Brisbane Council's chief administrator, James Cameron Slaughter. The Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha, to the northwest of the subject site, were officially opened by Brisbane City Council in 1976 and have grown to become Australia’s largest subtropical botanic gardens, featuring more than 200,000 plants that represent approximately 5,000 species from around the world. Arid, tropical and temperate plants, both native and exotic, thrive there14. Transport needs led to the building of the Western Freeway from Toowong Cemetery westward in 1967 and later in 2010 the surfacing of Gap Creek Road to the west. The infrastructure at the summit of Mt Coot-tha was developed over time and a new summit restaurant was built in 1983. The lookout area, located on a separate DOGIT, now contains the restaurant, a café, manicured gardens and a gift shop. The Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha’s latest addition opened in 2015. Delivered as part of the Legacy Way tunnel project, this four-hectare area includes a conservation walk, kitchen garden, new lagoon and children’s playground.

8 http://queenslandplaces.com.au/Mt-coot-tha 9 https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/facilities-recreation/parks-venues/mt-coot-tha-precinct 10 https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/environment-waste/natural-environment/bushland-reserves/mt-coot-tha-forest 11 Spillman, J. (2013). The History of Mount Coot-tha. Boolarong Pres, p.18. 12 https://www.australianexplorer.com/brisbane_mt_coot_tha.htm 13 https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/your_city_your_say_newsletter_winter_2009.pdf 14 Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Master Plan


33

The Mt Coot-tha visitor information centre opened in September 2017 as part of a significant upgrade to Council’s facilities on Mt Coot-tha including new picnic areas and facilities, an extension of the botanic gardens, new connecting trails and the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline.

7.2 Site Description and Usage15

Lot 2 on SP241566 occupies a 602.2015 ha area within the 1,600 ha Mt Coot-tha Forest, Brisbane’s largest natural area. Mt Coot-tha Forest is primarily open eucalypt forest and adjoins the south-eastern section of D'Aguilar National Park. As shown in Image 12 below, Mt Coot-tha Forest can be accessed via Sir Samuel Griffith Drive, which is a two-lane circuit of the outer edge of Mt Coot-tha and a renowned tourist drive, providing access to many picnic areas and vantage points. Mt Coot-tha is approximately 5.8km from the Brisbane CBD and is considered a unique and valued icon due to its location, resources and historical and cultural significance. Mt Coot-tha offers a variety of walking tracks (for pedestrian use only), as well as mountain bike trails and some designated horse-riding trails. The site includes nine different picnic areas and hundreds of known flora and fauna species. Mt Coot-tha is the source of Ithaca Creek and the area is a retreat for nature-based relaxation, recreation and learning. Television transmission towers for channels 7, 9, 10 and the ABC are situated to the north of Lot 2 on SP241566, along Sir Samuel Griffith Drive (see details in Table 5: Television transmission towers details, below).

Table 5: Television transmission towers details

Occupier Lot and Plan Area

Queensland Television Ltd. (Channel 9)

5/SL11727 6986m2 6/RP204323 1815m2 2/SP205191 5905m2 3/SP205191 12520m2

Television and Telecasters (Properties) Pty. Ltd. (Channel 10) 1/RP200271 2.4 ha 1/SP138610 10370m2

Channel 7 Brisbane Pty. Ltd. (Channel 7) 1/RP94639 18470m2 7/RP203445 2.0 ha

Mt Coot-tha Quarry, which supplies asphalt products to support Council's asphalt production and road surfacing programs, is located in the northeast of the DOGIT. The Summit Restaurant, Kuta Café and One Tree Hill Lookout are located at the summit of Mt Coot-tha, on Lot 1079 on SL5015. To the west of the Mt Coot-tha Quarry is the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha, which also includes a herbarium, library and planetarium. Part of the botanic gardens is located on the DOGIT, Lot 2 on SP241566. Other lots occupied by the botanic gardens are Lot 101 on SP266266 (2896m2), Lot 6 on SP266267 (14.36 ha) and Lot 1 on SP266267 (36.53 ha).

15 https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/environment-waste/natural-environment/bushland-reserves/mt-coot-tha-forest


34

Image 12: Mt Coot-tha Forest Trail Map

7.3 Local Area Description 16 17

Mt Coot-tha is 5.8km and 20 minutes’ drive from the Brisbane central business district. Covering 1,600 ha of land, Mt Coot-tha Forest includes forest, lookouts, picnic areas and bushwalking and mountain bike trails. The DOGIT that is the subject of this LMP occupies 602.2015 ha of the total Mt Coot-tha Forest. Mt Coot-tha Forest contains a diverse range of ecologically-significant flora and fauna habitats and provides a regionally-significant vegetated connection to the D’Aguilar National Park, regional trails and outdoor recreation opportunities. The subject site’s elevation and mountainous topography allows for extended views and vistas to the city and out towards Moreton Bay and beyond. Mt Coot-tha has played a recreational role in the childhood, teenage and adult lives of many Brisbane locals, tourists and guests; both nationally and internationally. Although Mt Coot-tha is a suburb of Brisbane, there are no residents in Mt Coot-tha itself. Brisbane has an estimated resident population of 1,184,215 people with a population growth of 1.8%, equal to the state average. The region is governed by Brisbane City Council which is the largest local government in Australia with a total land area of 1,340.3km2 and including 26 wards. Mt Coot-tha is located within Pullenvale Ward. Brisbane is Queensland’s capital city and has a labour workforce of 672,842, with the health care and social assistance industry being the largest employer. Brisbane’s unemployment rate is 5.6%, which is lower than the Queensland average. The region has a slightly lower youth (0-14 years) population (17.7%) than the rest of Queensland (19.7%) and a lower senior population (12.2%) than Queensland (14.7%). Brisbane’s median age is 34.5 years which is 2.5 years lower than the state median age of 37.

16 https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/about-council/governance-strategy/business-brisbane/business-opportunities/brisbane-community-profiles 17 RP Data 2018


35

7.4 Existing Uses

The DOGIT, Lot 2 on SP241566, has a community purpose designation of public park under the Land Act 1994. As trustee for the land, Council is required to maintain and manage the land consistent with that purpose and in the public interest. The site is zoned OS3 Open Space (Metropolitan) Zone and CN3 Conservation (Metropolitan) Zone under the Brisbane City Plan 2014. Visitor numbers to the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha are anticipated to increase from 700,000 to more than 1.7 million visitors per year in the next 15 years.18 With Brisbane’s population projected to increase by 69% by 2036 and a growing trend for increased housing density, smaller land lots and inner-city living, the role that Mt Coot-tha plays in daily life is likely to become more pronounced.

7.5 Existing Infrastructure

There is currently a system of walking trails and multi-use trails, toilets, picnic areas and car parks located on the DOGIT. These trails and amenities are used frequently for recreational purposes by the community. The trails connect to other areas of Mt Coot-tha and link up in certain areas to mountain bike and cycling pathways. Significant infrastructure at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout is located on the adjacent Lot 1079 on SL5015. Existing infrastructure at Mt Coot-tha can be accessed via Sir Samuel Griffith Drive.

7.6 Flooding

There is no identified flood risk for this area.19

7.7 Opportunities and Challenges

Opportunities and challenges facing the Mt Coot-tha Zipline project were assessed in the development of this LMP. Opportunities include the site’s positive attributes, as well as the benefits suggested to be provided by the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project. Challenges, whilst not insurmountable, represent those issues which have been considered and addressed in detail in the technical planning reports prepared in support of Council’s development application for the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project.

7.7.1 Opportunities

Natural Environment20

n The proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline takes a 'whole of mountain’ approach to allow for the enhancement of priority ecological values regardless of proximity to the development footprint. This means a holistic approach to the restoration and enhancement of values can be taken and is not limited to only focussing on those areas inside or close to the footprint. This results in more effective outcomes for the natural environment and biodiversity values of Mt Coot-tha

n The natural environment of Mt Coot-tha would remain available for recreational uses as access to natural areas under the proposed zipline cables would remain undisturbed and public access to these areas would remain predominantly unchanged

n A net gain for the environment with clearing to be offset within the Mt Coot-tha Forest - The offsets and benefits directly relate to Mt Coot-tha rather than financial offsets or offsets on private or

public land in another location n Citizen Science and community partnership programs - interest groups and the general public would be given

opportunities to be involved with monitoring programs (e.g. Birds Queensland and BirdLife with powerful owl and square tail kite monitoring)

18 Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Master Plan 19 http://cityplan2014maps.brisbane.qld.gov.au/CityPlan/ 20 Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, Ethos Urban, 2018


36

n Other research opportunities exist for detailed scientific studies by academics. Some potential opportunities being considered include: - Studies of the ecology of phascogales, greater gliders and koalas on Mt Coot-tha

n Installation of habitat for arboreal mammals: - Nest boxes are proposed to be established in areas where hollows are scarce on the mountain. These

would be of species-specific design, and species that are the prey of the powerful owl would be targeted - Nest boxes suitable for the powerful owl would be provided to improve opportunities for nesting in the area

n Habitat restoration - Minor restoration activities would occur around the project infrastructure (e.g. lantana removal) - Placement of hollow and large logs in areas of low log density and/or the construction of log ‘stacks’ or

windrows are proposed. Logs would be sourced from any required clearing works n Invasive species management

- Ongoing management of weeds and other pests jointly undertaken or funded by Council and the trustee lessee

n Education - Education on the history of the mountain, ecological features and Indigenous Cultural Heritage would be

provided to patrons through guided interpretative walks and signage. Community awareness and environmental appreciation of the significant and rich biodiversity of Mt Coot-tha would be improved for visitors to the site who may not be aware of these values

- Increased understanding and ownership by visitors especially those who live in Brisbane, would assist in protecting environmental values

Powerful Owl21

n More detailed and ongoing management and monitoring of both the powerful owl and its habitat. This would include remote monitoring and training of new personnel in appropriate monitoring techniques

n New nest boxes suitable for either powerful owls or their prey would be provided, but not in close proximity to the proposed development. This would improve availability of habitat for both the powerful owl (which currently has a lack available and suitable hollows for nesting) and prey

n Education. The trustee lessee would integrate educational information on the powerful owl into the Treetop Canopy Tour, new public signage, brochures and appropriate websites

n An arborist would be engaged to provide ongoing health and management monitoring of the powerful owl nesting tree on a 12-monthly basis and after significant events (e.g. major storms)

Scenic Amenity22

n Improved public access to viewing and lookout locations and quality visual experiences currently not available. This would include: views from the launch platform (which would be different to views from the existing Summit Lookout) and from the Scenic Zipline (which includes to the CBD); views from the Skywalk suspension bridge (which include views to the CBD); and the Treetop Canopy Tour which is proposed to offer a unique visual experience with the upper canopy of the forest

n The provision of new facilities which would encourage increased engagement with the Mt Coot-tha landscape and scenic amenity

n Improvements (by way of quality architecture and landscape treatments) to the disused Legacy Way carpark (which would accommodate the Arrival Centre). The proposal provides an opportunity to re-use and locate in an existing developed area of Mt Coot-tha

Traffic23

n Improvements to traffic arrangements at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout including: - Enhancement of traffic operations within the Summit Lookout area through removal of the existing ‘dead-

end’ car park aisle - Provision of a more efficient and legible location for passenger set-down

21 Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, Ethos Urban, 2018 22 ibid. 23 Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, Ethos Urban, 2018


37

- Enhancement of pedestrian arrival experience, safety, and connectivity within the Summit Lookout area - Relocation of the existing Translink bus stop, providing an improved pedestrian experience and operational

priority for buses n Introduction of a Mt Coot-tha shuttle service which would provide the following benefits to users of the broader

Mt Coot-tha and Botanic Gardens precinct: - Higher frequency and longer service periods compared with the existing Translink bus services (which

generally provide a single service to the Lookout on an hourly basis) - Provision of a more comprehensive public transport service to and around the mountain, including eight

new stops in well-visited locations, compared with the two locations currently serviced by Translink services within the precinct

- Reliable and frequent bus services would reduce the reliance on a single mode of transport, providing the opportunity for some light vehicle movements to be transferred to public transport modes, helping to alleviate the existing car parking pressures at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout and providing a significant benefit to traffic operation at peak times

Heritage24

n A new public viewing platform at the summit would augment the existing significant views to the CBD and beyond, provide additional capacity and provide alternative viewer locations

n Guides and, where appropriate, signage would be used to deliver an interpretive experience of the cultural heritage of Mt Coot-tha on the Skywalk (cultural heritage) Tour and Treetop Canopy Tour allowing visitors to engage more directly with the cultural heritage of Mt Coot-tha Forest and Mt Coot-tha Lookout and Kiosk

n Enhanced cultural heritage significance of Mt Coot-tha by increasing the range and choice of leisure activity opportunities of the site

n The Skywalk Suspension Bridge, sitting above and over the WWII remnants near JC Slaughter Falls, would allow for the preservation of the remnants by giving visitors the opportunity for further awareness, interpretation and education as part of the cultural heritage tour without damaging them

n Providing educational opportunities to visitors of the history and significance of the place through the Indigenous Interpretation Tour

n Improved ‘reach’ and spread of education would be available to visitors that may not ordinarily be aware of the mountain’s significance or have exposure to the heritage significance of the place

n Increased ownership by visitors, particularly those who live in Brisbane, of the public spaces from a closer engagement to the cultural heritage (through interpretation and information about the place). This increased ownership and investment would aid in preservation of the heritage-significant sites

n Dedicated pathways through the environment of Mt Coot-tha (Skywalk Tour, Treetop Canopy Tour and Scenic Zipline) to decrease impacts on heritage significant areas

n Increased exposure to and visitation of the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha. This would increase awareness of, and attendance at, the Richard Randall Art Studio, Planetarium and Gardens more broadly

Economic, Social and Health25

n Improved ability to capture tourism expenditure that currently leaks to other areas in southeast Queensland and further afield

n Considerable employment and training opportunities as well as indirect and flow on impacts n Additional specialised jobs and skilled labour including Indigenous tour guides and zipline specialists n Employment opportunities for returned service veterans, Indigenous persons and/or youth. A potential for

apprenticeships or internships at the zipline n Increased demand for tourist accommodation and increased business activity n Increasing opportunities to raise the awareness and appreciation of Indigenous history and the natural

environment through visits to the development as well as interpretative signs and increased ability for school excursions

n Improved quality of life through increased physical activity n Improved self-esteem and quality of life associated with employment opportunities

24 ibid. 25 Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, Ethos Urban, 2018


38

Other26

n Improved public amenities. An existing public toilet block in the Botanic Gardens, currently discharging to a pit/septic tank, would be connected to the reticulated sewerage system. This arrangement would improve public health and reduce environmental impact as the development currently discharges into the ground water of the gardens area. Uncontrolled discharge of the existing public toilet block would be removed

n Providing choice and diversification in recreation and environment related activities in the Mt Coot-tha Precinct n Development of a zipline as specifically identified in the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Master Plan

2018 and consistent with the Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030 document. Although non-statutory, these documents have been informed by extensive community engagement and are important as they represent aspirations for the Mt Coot-tha Precinct and Botanic Gardens

n Improving connectivity and functionality of the Mt Coot-tha precinct as a whole through the new shuttle service, additional public viewing platform, education programs and providing integration with the Botanic Gardens through a shared space for guides at the proposed kiosk

n Providing a new information booth at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout to better inform visitors of opportunities at Mt Coot-tha and more generally across Brisbane

n Improving user experience at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout by providing a new and upgraded arrival plaza that provides more space and a formalised and legible meeting point

n Creating a new Summit Lookout Entry Plaza that would provide an improved entry point, new gathering space, safer and continuous pedestrian paths, a new emergency vehicle parking area (currently not provided) and improved flow of traffic

7.7.2 Challenges

Appropriate responses to the planning, management, environmental and usage challenges identified below have been thoroughly researched by Brisbane City Council in the development of the Mt Coot-tha Zipline proposal and are incorporated in the technical planning reports prepared in support of Council’s development application for the project. n The proposed zipline development is within a Biodiversity area (high ecological significance) under the Brisbane

City Plan 2014 n Some clearing and trimming of vegetation would be required for the project. Given the nature of the project (i.e.

mostly aerially based) and a concerted effort to limit the clearing impact to ~0.1% of the remnant vegetation of Mt Coot-tha Forest) the project would not result in fragmentation

n Several locally-significant fauna species are present (e.g. brush-tailed phascogale, short eared possum, major skink and great barred frog). The design of the project has addressed the protection of these species

n Threatened and near threatened flora and fauna species have been confirmed on the site - Two threatened flora species were detected during a flora survey of the site, including the vulnerable

slender milkvine in eight locations and the near threatened hairy hazelwood in two locations - Three threatened fauna species were confirmed during the survey being koala, listed as a vulnerable

species under Commonwealth and state legislation, greater glider, listed as a vulnerable species under Commonwealth legislation and tusked frog, listed as a vulnerable species under state legislation

- The state-listed powerful owl is known to utilise habitats of Mt Coot-tha for both nesting and roosting - The design of the project has addressed the protection of these species

n Increasing use of Mt Coot-tha would need to be managed well, so the precinct retains its values for the city such as sustainability, high environmental quality and attractive landscapes

n Access must consider the needs of all users of the area, for their comfort, enjoyment and safety n The cultural and historical significance of the mountain should be expressed and celebrated in an equitable,

inclusive and sensitive way n Many stakeholders are involved. To be effective, future development of the site would require effective

engagement

26 ibid.


39

8 Management of the Trust Land

Brisbane City Council manages trustee leasing of reserves and Deeds of Grant in Trust (DOGIT) consistent with its Community Land and Facilities – Allocation and Leasing Procedure. In accordance with the Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy, Council will offer trustee leases and trustee permits to appropriate organisations for the ongoing management of trust land over which it is trustee. Council will maintain a strong partnership between DNRME, trustee lessees and the community in the ongoing management and maintenance of trust land. The continuation of legitimate secondary uses on trust land managed by Brisbane City Council generates revenue that is important for the ongoing maintenance of trust land in the city.

8.1 Primary Use

According to the Queensland Government’s Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust, primary use:

“Means the community / public purpose for which the original reserve / deed of grant in trust was gazetted and cannot in law be used for any other purpose.27”

8.2 Secondary Use

A secondary use:

“Means a use that is to be made of the whole or part of an area of the original reserve / deed of grant in trust by a third party (i.e.: other than the State or trustee of the primary use of the trust land). A secondary use is authorised under the Land Act 1994 by the issue of a trustee lease / permit over the whole or part of a reserve or deed of grant in trust, by the trustee with the approval of the Minister, to a trustee lessee / permittee. IMPORTANT NOTE: The Land Act 1994 requires a secondary use must be consistent with the gazetted primary use or where approval is given by the Minister for an inconsistent use with the gazetted primary use, that use must not diminish the purpose of the trust land.28”

A secondary use therefore occurs where the trustee leases or issues a permit over a part or the whole of the trust land to another person or body, where this arrangement is in the public interest.29 Generally, secondary uses of trust land in Brisbane City should be allowed where they: n Are consistent with the primary use of the trust land n Are suited to the existing infrastructure on the trust land n Support the maintenance of the trust land n Allow for ongoing general public use of the trust land n Are located on community purpose trust land as a result of historical circumstances and the use is well

established n Provide a desirable service to users of the trust land n Provide a community service that does not diminish the purpose and amenity of the trust land n Support a range of community activities and outcomes that improve the quality of life for the community

27 Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Queensland Government, p.8 28 ibid. p.8 29 ibid. p.3


40

8.3 Ongoing Secondary Use Considerations

The Queensland Government’s Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust sets out the following criteria for considering whether a proposed secondary use of trust land is appropriate to the qualities and capabilities of the original purpose for which the trust land was set aside30: n Strategic value n Consistency with primary use n Commerciality n Exclusivity n Incremental progression and forward planning The ongoing use of Mt Coot-tha will need to address these criteria, as detailed below, to ensure appropriate secondary use of the trust land.

8.3.1 Strategic Value

The Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust notes that some trust land may have a strategic value, derived from the land’s strategic location rather than its inherent intrinsic value. Mt Coot-tha’s strategic value is well recognised and documented in this LMP. Brisbane City Council should capitalise on Mt Coot-tha’s capabilities and strategic value as an existing community venue to enhance, not diminish, the purpose of the trust land. Brisbane City Council’s proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project would provide new opportunities for visitors to the trust land to experience the site’s strategic value, including its panoramic views, heritage values, environmental values and Indigenous cultural heritage.

8.3.2 Consistency with Primary Use

According to the Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust, the key element for consideration when assessing an application for secondary use of trust land is whether the proposed secondary use is appropriate to the qualities and capabilities for which the trust land was originally set aside. Based on the findings and recommendations of the technical reports commissioned by Brisbane City Council for the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline, such a use is considered an appropriate secondary use of the trust land. A consistent secondary use is one that is essential or necessary to enable the trust land’s purpose to be fulfilled31. While the proposed secondary use of the DOGIT is not essential to fulfil the gazetted purpose of the trust land, it would: n Allow for ongoing general public use of the trust land n Provide a desirable service to users of the trust land n Support a range of activities and outcomes that improve the quality of life for the community n Not impair nor reduce the ability of the trust land to fulfil its purpose n Not diminish the purpose of the trust land n Sensitively support and capitalise on the amenity of the trust land n Generate valuable income for reinvestment in maintenance of the trust land

30 Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Queensland Government, p.9 31 Ibid. p.10


41

8.3.3 Commerciality

The Queensland Government’s Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy defines ‘commercial’ as the exchange of money for goods and services, regardless of how that money is used32. The policy notes that certain commercial activities are permitted on community purpose trust land in appropriate circumstances, including uses that provide desirable services to users of the trust land. The proposed trustee lessee, Zipline Australia, makes the following estimations for the proposed project’s ability to attract visitors to the Mt Coot-tha area by the third year of operation:

These visitor numbers demonstrate that the proposed project would satisfy the criteria for appropriate secondary use of the trust land as it would: n Provide a desirable service to users of the trust land n Provide a community service that does not diminish the purpose and amenity of the trust land Whilst there is a commercial component to the project, this commercial component is considered an acceptable activity on the trust land because it would: n Generate lease revenue for reinvestment in trust land management and maintenance n Not have a negative effect on the public interest or businesses in the area n Not diminish or restrict the overall use of the site

8.3.4 Exclusivity and Restrictions of Proposed Use

The term ‘exclusivity’ refers to secondary occupation of trust land that excludes use by the wider community. In the ongoing management of the proposed project and the enhancement of the DOGIT, Brisbane City Council is to ensure, through its leasing provisions, that public access is maintained where appropriate, in support of the primary and appropriate secondary uses of the trust land. The development of the proposed Scenic Zipline, Treetop Canopy Tour, Skywalk Tour and supporting infrastructure has been designed to utilise the intrinsic natural features of the environment to enhance the use of the trust land. The Cloud Stations that are planned for the Treetop Canopy Tour have been designed to ensure Mt Coot-tha visitors can walk under the Cloud Stations and continue to enjoy the surrounding area for recreational purposes consistent with the trust land’s primary purpose, Public Park. Pedestrian access to the proposed zipline experiences would be controlled via lockable gates at the entry to the Treetop Canopy Tour, Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline and at both ends of the Skywalk Suspension Bridge. Signage and physical graded separation would be used in all other areas to control and manage access. Apart from managing direct access to the zipline experiences, the proposed development does not result in a loss of public access.

32 Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Queensland Government, p.16

Treetop Canopy Tour•35,000 visitors annually

Skywalk Tour•193,000 visitors annually

• (includes cultural heritage walk and suspension bridge)

Scenic Zipline•120,000 visitors annually


42

The proposed secondary use of the trust land for the Mt Coot-tha Zipline includes an acceptable level of low-impact exclusivity. There would be some restricted access, however, as detailed in Table 6 below, this restricted access is considered acceptable given its small scale, and would not prevent the community from accessing the site for its primary use, in a manner consistent with the current public use of Mt Coot-tha. Table 6: Restricted access from proposed development at Mt Coot-tha

Attractions Restricted Access / Exclusive Use Spaces Restriction

Scenic Zipline

Gates would be used to control access to the zipline start area of the cantilevered viewing platform. This would differentiate zipline guests from those visitors enjoying the free view from the viewing platform and provide a safety barrier to exclude unauthorised access to the suspended starting area.

Guests would pay to access this area.

The landing platform would use a gate to ensure a one-way flow of guests from the tour and prevent members of the public unsafely accessing the landing area.

This area would be restricted for safety reasons.

Treetop Canopy Tour

Entry to the Treetop Canopy Tour and both ends of the suspension bridge would be via lockable gates.


Treetop start and finish areas would include a lockable steel portal structure to provide safe access to the Treetop Canopy Tour.

This area would be restricted to ensure the safety of visitors not accessing the attraction.

Cultural Heritage Tour

Gated access would be used to control access to both ends of the suspension bridge walk which is part of the tour.


Zipline Arrival Centre Building

Unrestricted access to the arrival centre building would be available for all visitors to Mt Coot-tha during business hours.

The arrival centre building would be locked outside of operating hours for safety and security of infrastructure.

All areas Signage, paths and forest areas. No restrictions.

8.3.5 Incremental Progression and Forward Planning

The Queensland Government’s Information Kit for Land Management Planning for Reserves or Deeds of Grant in Trust explains how a proposed use of trust land can contribute to an incremental chain of events that leads to a final outcome quite different from that for which it was initially intended. This phenomenon is identified as incremental progression. Brisbane City Council has systems in place to limit inappropriate uses of, or development on, trust land, thereby protecting trust land in the city from future incremental progression and halting or reviewing any historical incremental progression that has occurred on trust land. The following Council policies, systems and procedures govern the use of trust land in the city and offer protection from incremental progression: n Brisbane City Plan 2014 n Community Facilities Policy n Sustainable Built Environment Policy n Asset Management Policy n Standardised trustee leases, incorporating DNRME’s Mandatory Standard Terms for Trustee Leases


43

8.4 Proposed Trustee Leasing

In accordance with DNRME’s Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy, a secondary use of trust land occurs, “…when a person or organisation, other than the appointed trustee, obtains approval from the trustee to use the trust land under a trustee lease or trustee permit.33” Section 57 of the Land Act 1994 provides for trustees to lease all or part of a parcel of trust land. Trustee leases must incorporate the Mandatory Standard Terms for a Trustee Lease as prepared by DNRME in accordance with Section 57 (2) of the Land Act 1994. To govern the ongoing, regular use of the subject site for the operation of the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline, Council proposes to enter into a trustee lease with an appropriate lessee. The trustee lease would provide the authority for the lessee to use the trust land for approved purposes, subject to development approval conditions and other relevant approvals and permits. The proposed trustee lease would be for a period for a period of 20 years. The proposed trustee lease would comprises both land and volumetric areas34 (refer Image 13, below) to capture structures and suspended corridors (containing ziplines, suspension bridges and the like). Within the context of the broader subject site, the on-ground lease areas for the development footprint cover approximately 1% of the total land area of the DOGIT.

Image 13: Map of proposed lease areas

8.4.1 Lease Terms

Under Brisbane City Council’s policies, systems and procedures that govern the use of trust land in the city, lease terms may be negotiated on a case-by-case basis following consideration of the proposed trustee lessee’s long-term objectives, management and financial capacity, capital investment, and Council’s vision and strategy for the facility. Approval of tenure is in accordance with Brisbane City Council Delegations and the Land Act 1994. 33 Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Queensland Government, p.20 34 Note that land beneath volumetric areas remains accessible and open


44

The proposed trustee lease for the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline would be for a period for a period of 20 years.

8.4.2 Rental, Fees and Charges

In accordance with the Secondary Use of Trust Land Policy, the rent charged for secondary use of trust land is to be established with consideration of management objectives for the trust land and of community benefit. As per section 63(2) of the Land Act 1994, “The rent must be the most appropriate rent having regard to the use and the community benefit and purpose of the trustee lease or trustee permit.” Council determines an appropriate rental for its leases annually in accordance with its approved annual fees and charges schedule. The rental charged for a future trustee lease over the subject site must be consistent with and have regard to: n The level of intensity of the use n The rent paid for similar uses on private land n The viability of the activity n The benefit to the community of the activity n The trustee lessee's particular circumstances It is proposed that the trustee lessee would be required to pay a commensurate annual rent that is consistent with the points above, as well as a percentage of total turnover to Brisbane City Council. The annual rent would be increased in accordance with CPI on each anniversary of the date of commencement and reviewed after prescribed periods in accordance with market reviews. The turnover used to calculate the percentage payable to Council includes the aggregate of all receipts, revenue and income derived directly or indirectly from: n Tour and ticket sales n Gift shop, including photographs and memorabilia n Sales of food and beverages n Charges for all other services rendered n Receipts from all other business conducted on or from the premises The lessee would be responsible for 100% of all expenses incurred by the trustee in repair, maintenance, renewal and insurance of the premises and its operation of services.

8.5 Native Title

The Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993 preamble states, “…native title is extinguished by valid government acts that are inconsistent with the continued existence of native title rights and interests, such as the grant of freehold or leasehold estates.” In the event of significant development works on the subject site, Council and lessees must follow, where relevant, procedures provided in the Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993, as amended. Native Title Rights and Interests would be assessed in accordance with Queensland’s Native Title Works Procedures prior to any dealing or development being undertaken on the trust land.


45

9 Consultation

This DRAFT full land management plan will be placed on public display and an extensive consultation program will be facilitated to gather community feedback on the proposed use of the trust land for the Mt Coot-tha Zipline. Feedback received during the consultation program will be recorded and reported to Brisbane City Council and DNRME and the LMP will be updated as necessary.

9.1 Proposed consultation methodology

The following activities are proposed for the LMP consultation program: n Placement of a public notices advertisement in the Courier Mail n Publication of the draft LMP on Council’s website to provide easy, public access to downloadable LMP files n Placement of a hard copy of the draft LMP in the Brisbane City Council Library at 266 George Street, Brisbane n Publication and circulation of information regarding the LMP and the zipline project via an email update to

Council’s database of those who have sought information on the project, as well as a direct mail campaign to approximately 21,000 residences in adjacent suburbs

n Development of an online survey, to be hosted by Brisbane City Council to gather feedback from the community n Publication of a project email address, postal address and contact phone number n Four community drop-in feedback sessions, to be held in Brisbane City and at Mt Coot-tha n Ongoing consultation with DNRME n Engagement with the Brisbane City Councillor for Pullenvale Ward Following the conclusion of the public consultation period, planned to be conducted over a four-week period, feedback received will be collated and included in a stakeholder engagement report, summarising issues and concerns raised during consultation and how they are to be addressed in the LMP. The recommendations of the LMP will be finalised following completion of the plan’s consultation program, subject to the findings of the stakeholder engagement report.

9.2 Consultation Conducted Throughout Project

Throughout the project, Brisbane City Council has conducted targeted briefings with key stakeholders, including: n Councillor Richards, Local Councillor for Pullenvale Ward n Birds Queensland n Birdlife Southern Queensland n Botanic Gardens Volunteer Guides n Botanic Gardens staff n Botanic Gardens welcome team n Mr Michael Berkman MP, Member for Maiwar n Relevant Queensland Government departments n Turrbal people (Traditional Owners for Mt Coot-tha) Key stakeholders were identified and invited to have targeted briefing sessions regarding the concept design and project benefits, and to answer any questions and concerns. Briefings were held with: n Councillor Peter Matic, Councillor for Paddington Ward, and constituent n Councillor Kate Richards, Councillor for Pullenvale Ward n Birds Queensland n Botanic Gardens volunteer guides and welcome staff n Botanic Gardens staff n Michael Berkman MP, Member for Maiwar n BirdLife Southern Queensland


46

10 Proposed Land Management Actions

This LMP has been informed by the following detailed technical reports prepared as part of the project’s development application: n Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, prepared by Ethos Urban n Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3, prepared by Cardno n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Turrbal Historical and Cultural Analysis), prepared by Maroochy Barambah & Ade

Kukoyi for Turrbal Assoc. Inc. n Bushfire Risk Assessment and Management Plan – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility, prepared by Cardno n Traffic Impact Statement Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project, prepared by SLR Consulting n Visual Impact Assessment of Mt Coot-tha Zipline, prepared by Insight Design and Assessment Services n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by Urbis n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Stormwater Management Plan, prepared by BMT Eastern Australia n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Zipline) Landscape Concept, prepared by SLR Consulting n Vegetation Management Plan Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility, prepared by Cardno n Mt Coot-tha Zipline Powerful Owl and Forest Raptor Assessment, prepared by 28 South Environmental n Noise Impact Assessment – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project, Sir Samuel Griffith Drive Mt Coot-tha, prepared by MWA

Environmental

10.1 Land Management Action Plan

The following action plan summarises the key actions identified in the reports above, to deal with specific land management issues.

Land Management Issue

Details and Actions Responsibilities

Bushfire Management

Informed by: Bushfire Risk Assessment and Management Plan – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility, Cardno, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n No people to be allowed onsite on days when prevailing fire weather

conditions are Severe to Catastrophic n Suspend operation of the zipline facility in response to the identification of

a bushfire that is close enough to pose a potential threat to the safe operation of the facilities on days of lesser fire danger

n The largest proposed building (Arrival Centre) would be located in the least hazardous part of the site, being an existing cleared and paved area, which is downslope from adjacent areas of open forest and has direct access to Sir Samuel Griffith Drive

n The proposed development makes provision for appropriate building setbacks, fuel management access and water supplies to facilitate building defence and fire suppression: - Clearing and off-site removal of weeds - Thinning of accumulated fine surface fuels (e.g. dead leaves, bark,

twigs less than 6mm thickness) - Clearing of shrubs and small tress - Retention of native grasses, vines, herbs and low shrubs - Removal of lower branches of retained trees - Removal/relocation of coarse woody debris (i.e. large fallen tree

branches and/or trunks) from outside of the zone to another location on Mount Coot-tha

n A reticulated water supply would be provided to all major buildings and structures (i.e. Arrival Centre and Scenic Zipline launch and landing platforms) for fire-fighting purposes

Brisbane City Council and trustee lessee


47



n The development is accessed from Sir Samuel Griffith Drive and the internal Botanic Gardens road network which are constructed, all-weather roads capable of carrying emergency service vehicles

n For experiences that do not have available road access, such as the Treetop Canopy Tour platforms and landings, the Skywalk suspension bridge and the zipline routes, the staff would be appropriately trained and resourced to affect a safe evacuation of patrons in the event of an emergency bushfire situation

n The impact of the proposed zipline development on the capacity of the local road network servicing Mt Coot-tha has been considered and various upgrades to the existing road network and available public transport services (shuttle bus) are proposed to reduce traffic congestion and relieve impacts to existing carpark facilities to ensure that the road network can operate effectively, including during emergencies

n The development is not proposing additional vegetation clearing for the purpose of bushfire hazard risk management, beyond that which is considered necessary and risk appropriate for the land use and to achieve a tolerable level of risk for people and property

n The proposed bushfire hazard reduction zones for the development are considered risk appropriate having been informed by a nuanced understanding of bushfire behaviour and bushfire hazard modelling (including further sensitivity analysis) and a fit for purpose Bushfire Risk Assessment and Management Plan (BRAMP) prepared in accordance with best practice standards and guidelines, including AS/NZS ISO 31000 Risk Management

n The development is not proposing to establish wide firebreaks around constructed infrastructure, as such an extensive firebreak is not considered necessary to achieve an acceptable or tolerable level of risk to people and property, and Brisbane City Council would be strongly against such a proposition

Powerful owl and other forest raptors

Informed by: Mt Coot-tha Zipline Powerful Owl and Forest Raptor Assessment, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n Moving the ziplines to the proposed new location would reduce the potential

for clipping and collisions with the overhead wires and potential for attack on patrons

n Runs closest to the powerful owl nest would be closed during nest establishment and fledgling seasons to further reduce potential for impact

n Monitoring of the nest tree by remote detection technologies n Management of the powerful owl nest and regular communication with

special interest groups n Management and monitoring of nest tree decline n Undertaking an alternative nest tree survey and the introduction of nesting

boxes for both forest raptors and their prey n Specific construction management techniques to minimise potential

disturbance particularly on the powerful owl nest n Sharing of educational insights for the powerful owl, which includes guide

told stories, brochures and website information (not disclosing the location of the nest)

n Training of zipline staff to monitor behaviour of forest raptors to minimise potential for attacks and disturbance

n Hours of operation for the Tree Top Canopy Tour would be limited to daylight to further reduce potential impacts on the behaviour of the powerful owl



48



n Establishment of a Seasonable Helicopter Restriction Zone between May 1 and September 30 where helicopter-supported construction is restricted to a minimum of 250m of the nest tree

n Monitored helicopter flight pattern towards the development is well-removed from East Ithaca Creek gully and gradually moves towards the site to allow for the Powerful Owl to become habituated to the helicopter noise and would be monitored as part of the Powerful Owl Management Plan

n The use ‘flappers’ as part of the proposed zipline development (durable plastic disks that are attached to powerlines to minimise bird strike)

Flora and Fauna Informed by: Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018; Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Zipline) Landscape Concept, 2018; Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3, 2018; Mt Coot-tha Zipline Powerful Owl and Forest Raptor Assessment, 2018; Vegetation Management Plan Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility, 2018 n The project has been specifically designed to avoid nesting habitat of the

powerful owl by providing a wide buffer to known nest tree and including an alternative zipline route (stations 7 to 9) which increases the buffer during breeding season. Night time zipline activity on the Treetop Canopy Tour would not occur

n Slender milkvine occurs at a number of locations within the Study Area but none would be directly impacted by the project. A protected plants clearing permit and impact management plan would be required for clearing supporting habitat within 100 m of this species in accordance with Flora Survey Guidelines – Protected Plants Nature Conservation Act

n The project would result in the loss of 21 known hollow-bearing trees (accounting for ~41 individual hollows) and 7 suspected hollow-bearing trees (accounting for ~13 suspected individual hollows). Furthermore, additional hollows may be impacted in retained trees that are subject to pruning. These hollows would be relocated, and / or offset through the provision of nest boxes

n The general landscape design intent for each of the specific sites would remain respectful of the endemic vegetation and existing landform, integrating into the existing native character for that particular site

n The character of the landscape around the proposed elements would borrow from the natural surrounds (or intended landscape character in the case of the Botanic Gardens) including vegetation species, to ensure any new elements ultimately sit within the landscape

n The landscape design would be natural in layout and form and the selection of species would provide a transition into the surrounding landscape

n Avoid removal and pruning of trees with observed fauna and ensure that these are not removed until fauna has relocated

n Salvage and relocate native beehives n Employ fauna spotter/catchers to take care of fauna during construction n Noise and vibration impacts can be managed by limiting noisy activities

during construction and operation phases. Construction noise can be reduced by using alternative tools and equipment that produce less noise during daylight hours

n The project would result in a Significant Residual Impact for Matters of Local Ecological Significance (MLES) and as such offsets would be triggered under the Environmental Offsets Act 2014. Given this, and the importance of the location, impacts would be offset in a manner that exceeds the minimum 3:1 ratio required under Brisbane City Council’s offset framework



49



Vegetation Management

Informed by: Vegetation Management Plan Mt Coot-tha Zipline Facility, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018; Mt Coot-tha Zipline Powerful Owl and Forest Raptor Assessment, 2018; Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3, 2018 n Clearing, trimming and pruning of vegetation should only occur when

completely necessary to meet safe operation and practices in accordance with the VMP. If a hollow-bearing tree or hollow-bearing branch must be removed the log should be salvaged. Nest boxes can also be installed in areas where hollows have been removed

n Vegetation pruning would become a regular part of the operational phase of the development to maintain the rider clearance zone. Pruning must be carried out with due care by an appropriately qualified arborist under the supervision of the project arborist. All tree work is to be undertaken in accordance with AS4373-2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees

n Pruning of trees is required where they occur in close proximity to proposed infrastructure to maintain aerial clearance areas for catenary cables and elevated structures, being: - Scenic Zipline – 3m below all catenary cables and 2m either side of

the outer catenaries; - Treetop Canopy Tour – 3m below and 2m either side of the catenary

cable; - Suspension Bridge – 2m above, below and either side of the bridge

structure; Note: The Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy has confirmed in writing that it is satisfied that the proposed vegetation clearing in Category B area associated with the proposed zipline development meets the requirements of section 22A(2)(d) of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 n Erosion can be mitigated through the implementation of an erosion and

sediment control (ESC) plan developed in accordance with Best Practice Erosion and Sediment Control (2008)

n The Powerful Owl and Forest Raptor Report provides recommendations for avoidance of the Powerful owl roost, including ‘no -fly’ procedures proximate to nesting habitat

n Precautionary measures can be put in place that prevent the introduction of weeds, pest species and disease. During construction phase all personnel and equipment should be washed down prior to entry into the site. Wash-down facilities should be in accordance with industry standards and these practices are to be maintained during future maintenance. The storage of equipment and stockpiles should be kept in a way that does not provide habitat for vermin. These matters can be addressed in a Hygiene Management Plan

n The use of eco-clips should be limited whilst still ensuring each cloud station is safe

n The location and size of stockpiles requires management to reduce potential impacts. Stockpiles are to be limited to the minimum area necessary for safe construction. Number of stockpiles are located outside of root impact zones to reduce the spread of impact. Stockpiles are to be kept raised, uncluttered and temporary barriers established to reduce the likelihood of vermin habituation. Fill resulting from excavation would be reused to the greatest extent to limit potential introduction of weeds from imported materials



50



n The hardening and flattening of land is to be limited to areas directly below host trees/posts and to the minimum extent required to meet safety regulations. Vegetation and root impact zones are avoided where feasible

n All staff must have an environmental induction to be aware of the value of the environment and proposed methods to minimise potential impact

n All tree removal must be undertaken by suitably qualified arborists n Use of helicopters, pedestrian transportation and existing cleared paths

to install development where possible. Use of small machinery is also proposed to minimise disturbance

n Restoration and rehabilitation of all construction areas and paths would be undertaken. Storage of machinery, stockpiles etc. would occur in existing cleared areas

n Precautions to protect trees not planned for trimming or removal (fencing, directing felled trees away from other trees etc.)

n Development of a sediment and erosion management plan n A Tree Protection Plan is in place to protect a tree in the location of the

proposed kiosk

Acoustic Impact Informed by: Noise Impact Assessment – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project, Sir Samuel Griffith Drive Mt Coot-tha n The potentially affected areas when considered in respect of the overall

physical area of the Conservation Zone are minimal and are located within areas already affected by road traffic noise, helicopter noise, the quarry and existing bushland activities

n The predicted resultant noise levels from the Scenic Zipline, Treetop Canopy Tour, Suspension Bridge, Boardwalk and Arrival Centre and associated car parking and bus transfer noise satisfy the relevant noise (planning) criteria for day, evening and night-time noise limits at surrounding sensitive zone boundaries

n The proposed development complies with the noise limits based upon attenuation due to distance from noise sensitive uses, surrounding topography and existing noise sources in the locality. The development results in relatively minor increases in noise within the proposed use areas and on the basis that the development assessment has been conducted on worst case maximum patron throughput per hour, the overall cumulative predictions are very conservative

n The noise from construction activities is recommended to be managed through a Construction Phase Noise Management Plan which incorporates the recommendations of the Ecological Assessment reports and shall provide suitable noise management measures including buffers and timing of specific activities to prevent unacceptable noise amenity impacts

n In summary the assessment undertaken demonstrates that the proposed development can operate in accordance with the relevant noise amenity standards. It is recommended that a Noise Management Plan form part of day to day operation of the use to manage and minimise noise impacts of the use in a structured manner


Capital Works Informed by: Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3, 2018 n Boreholes and construction holes require management to avoid animals

falling into holes and becoming injured. Temporary barriers can be established when holes are left open for more than 24 hours to prevent animals falling in. When boreholes are required to stay open cover plates can be used



51



Heritage Informed by: Mt Coot-tha Zipline Heritage Impact Statement, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n The proposal has a minimal detrimental impact on the cultural heritage

significance of the place n The development protects the fabric and setting of the heritage place while

providing for its use, interpretation and management n The proposal has been designed to minimise any detrimental impact n The proposal would have a minimal detrimental impact on views to and from

the summit, through the lowering and positioning of the launch area and viewing platform to the south of the Lookout, towards the Border Ranges and away from the Brisbane CBD views

n The proposal is directly relevant to, and relies on, the natural environment, biodiversity, recreation and cultural heritage values of the Mt Coot-tha precinct

n The proposal would have no impact on the WWII remnants but would provide new opportunities to interpret the significance and history of these places. The suspension bridge would be situated above and across the remnants, with no infrastructure installed nearby, or direct public access. This position would allow visitors to view and interpret the site, and accompanying information would allow for increased interpretation of the history of the place

n The proposal has been designed to minimise the impact on trees, particularly the removal and trimming of mature trees, within the forest by utilising existing cleared areas, adopting sensitive construction methods and limited clearing for bushfire management to that which is necessary

n The proposal is compatible with its current use for recreation and significant views

n The proposed development does continue the historical use of the places for recreation and views

n The place has some archaeological potential – the WWII remnants present some archaeological potential. Infrastructure in the design avoids this area, producing nil detrimental effects on the archaeological potential of this site

n The location of the infrastructure avoids detrimental impacts n A Chance Finds procedure would be adopted to appropriately manage any

unexpected finds


Sanitation Informed by: Ecological Assessment Report – Mt Coot-tha Zipline Phase 3, 2018 n Waste management solutions would be provided to mitigate an increase of

waste on the mountain. This includes supplying rubbish bins at appropriate locations, educating and encouraging guests to minimise their waste and advising guests to leave non-essential items at the zipline start point to reduce incidences of litter across the project area

n Waste management operational procedures to be in place to reduce spread of vermin and prevent access to food waste by pest fauna


Indigenous and Cultural Protection

Informed by: Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Turrbal Historical and Cultural Analysis), 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n Maintain meaningful and genuine discussions with the Turrbal

representatives aimed at preserving the spiritual and cultural values of the area for future generations

n Ensure that Turrabal personnel are kept informed of all activities (including ground-disturbance) in the Kuta-Baneraba precinct that may impact on the Turrbal cultural values

n Turrbal representatives prepare/deliver Cultural Awareness to BCC and/or its contractors involved in the works prior to construction

n The Mt Coot-tha Aboriginal Art Trail is unaffected by the proposal



52



Traffic Management

Informed by: Traffic Impact Statement Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n The traffic and transport aspects of the proposed development satisfy all

relevant outcomes when assessed against the relevant requirements of the Brisbane City Plan 2014 TAPS Code and the QLD SDAP Codes

n The design of access, car parking and servicing arrangements would satisfy the relevant TAPS PSP and AS2890.1 criteria

n The project would provide adequate provisions for the anticipated service vehicles movements

n The revised traffic arrangements at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout would improve flow and provide safe access for pedestrians

n A new shuttle bus turn lane and circulation road would be introduced to service the Treetop Canopy Tour

n Improvements would be made to the on-street arrangements along Sir Samuel Griffith Drive (one-way section) north of the Arrival Centre

n New shuttle bus stops would be added at the following locations: - Arrival Centre - Treetop Canopy Tour start site - Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout - JC Slaughter Falls (on Sir Samuel Griffith Drive utilising the existing

easternmost Translink/Legacy Way workforce bus stop) - JC Slaughter Falls car parking area (optional) - Botanic Gardens entry road (inbound and outbound stops) - Botanic Gardens – Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline tour landing zone

(including new pedestrian crossing) n Signage would be added to Scenic Drive (southbound) prior to the Arrival

Centre access (i.e. Scenic Drive/Sir Samuel Griffith Drive intersection): Signage warning unfamiliar drivers of cyclists’ presence in the area (e.g. such as ‘watch for cyclists’)

n Signage would be added to Sir Samuel Griffith Drive (northbound) prior to the arrival centre access (i.e. Scenic Drive/Sir Samuel Griffith Drive intersection): Signage warning cyclists of vehicles turning ahead and to check/reduce speeds


Maintaining Visual Amenity

Informed by: Visual Impact Assessment of Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n The proposed development would allow appropriate maintenance of the

landscape and scenic values of Mt Coot-tha and the Botanic Gardens n The project components are thoughtfully sited, designed, and landscaped to

respond to particular site characteristics and to minimise adverse impacts n The scale and treatments of the proposed development protects the visual

significance of the area n The proposed built form would generally be sited below the important

ridgelines and skylines of the area n Clearing of vegetation would be minimised and vegetative screening has

been incorporated into the design to screen structures


Stormwater Informed by: Mt Coot-tha Zipline Stormwater Management Plan, 2018; Planning Report - Mt Coot-tha Zipline, 2018 n The intrusion of one of the Scenic Zipline intermediate tower supports would

be out of the 100 year flood extent and therefore would not affect flooding within the corridor

n The Scenic Zipline landing platform is identified within a waterway corridor in the Botanic Gardens, however, given the vertical clearance between the



53



landing platform and the standing water level in the lake, the proposed structure would not affect flood levels for minor or major flood events

n The proposed road widening required for the shuttle bus stop within JC Slaughter Falls picnic area is located just outside of the waterway corridor and would be further investigated during the detailed design phase

n The waterway crossing required for the arrival centre services does not involve flood level critical infrastructure

n The sewer upgrade works for the kiosk within the Botanic Gardens would be within an existing roadway alignment, therefore would not alter the existing impervious surface area or flood levels on the road

n Sufficient consideration of stormwater controls should be made to demonstrate compliance with the following: - Brisbane City Council’s Stormwater code within the City Plan 2014

(Brisbane City Council 2014a) - Queensland Government’s State Planning Policy Water Quality

Objectives (DILGP 2017) n Water sensitive design elements (sheet flow instead of pipes, permeable

walkways) should be incorporated to ensure that the development would produce a negligible increase in runoff compared to the current situation

10.2 Summaries of Planning Reports

This section provides summaries of the planning reports prepared in support of the development application for the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline project.

10.2.1 Ecological Assessment Report Summary

Cardno was commissioned by Brisbane City Council to complete an ecological assessment for the proposed zipline project at Mt Coot-tha. Cardno has completed three blocks of field assessments within Mt Coot-tha Forest since January 2017 to assist in refining the development footprint and identifying impacts. The Ecological Assessment Report documents the findings of the desktop and field ecological assessments completed in the Mt Coot-tha Forest and the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha. This includes the findings of the detailed ecological assessment completed within the proposed development footprint and surrounds between 27 February 2018 and 27 March 2018 and integrates key findings. The results of these assessments identified the following notable ecological features: n Koala is listed as a vulnerable species under the Commonwealth and state legislation n Greater glider, listed as a vulnerable species under the Commonwealth and state legislation was recorded from

approximately 870m north of the development footprint n Known nesting habitat for powerful owl, listed as a vulnerable species under the state legislation, occurs on Mt

Coot-tha outside of the proposed development footprint n Slender milk vine listed as vulnerable under the Nature Conservation Act occurs in multiple locations within the

study area n Tusked frog, listed as a vulnerable species under the State legislation, is known from waterways within the

survey area n A number of locally significant flora and fauna species such as the broad leafed spotted gum and brushed-tailed

phascogale n Broad parts of the study area are mapped as Category B vegetation for the purposes of the Vegetation

Management Act 1999 (VMA), with minor areas of Category C and X. Despite passing through multiple regional ecosystems (REs) actual impacts would be limited to REs 12.11.5 and RE 12.11.3a

n Known and potential hollow-bearing trees have been recorded within 30 m of proposed zipline infrastructure The project delivers a number of beneficial outcomes including:


54

n Targeted restoration efforts to improve/increase the ecological connectivity on Mt Coot-tha n The project involves minor restoration activities surrounding the project infrastructure, for example lantana

removal n Targeted management plans can be established to control invasive species n The identification of areas with a scarcity of hollow-bearing trees. Installation of species-specific nest boxes in

these areas for arboreal mammals and the powerful owl n The opportunity for Citizen Science projects. These may include monitoring programs involving the bird species

present at Mt Coot-that. For example, powerful owl and square tail kite monitoring n Opportunities for scientific studies investigating the ecology of the native fauna species present on Mt Coot-tha

including phascogales, greater gliders and koalas Giving consideration to the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), the Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act), Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VM Act), Fisheries Act 1994 and Brisbane City Plan 2014 (City Plan), the aim of the Ecological Assessment Report was to quantify the likely impacts to mapped and ground-truthed ecological constraints from the project. An impact assessment has been completed for the project to identify risks to ecological features during construction and operation of the project, and suggest appropriate management measures to avoid, minimise and mitigate impacts. The project aims to minimise impacts through design, and has sought to avoid the clearing of native vegetation as far as practical. The impact assessment has determined the following. n Impacts to koala habitat do not constitute a significant impact as per the Commonwealth Department of

Environment and Energy Significant Impact Guidelines n Impacts to the greater glider habitat do not constitute a significant impact as per the Commonwealth

Department of Environment and Energy Significant Impact Guidelines n The project has been specifically designed to avoid nesting habitat of the powerful owl by providing a wide

buffer to known nest tree and includes an alternative zipline route which increases the buffer during breeding season. Night time zipline activity on the Treetop Canopy Tour would not occur

n Slender milkvine occurs at a number of locations within the study area but none would be directly impacted by the project. A protected plants clearing permit and impact management plan would be required for clearing supporting habitat within 100 m of this species in accordance with Flora Survey Guidelines – Protected Plants NC Act

n The project would result in the loss of 21 known hollow-bearing trees (accounting for ~41 individual hollows) and 7 suspected hollow-bearing trees (accounting for ~13 suspected individual hollows). Furthermore, additional hollows may be impacted in retained trees that are subject to pruning. These hollows would be relocated, and/or offset through the provision of nest boxes. The project would therefore require an approved Species Management Program under the NC Act

n The extent of impact on areas of High Ecological Significance as mapped in the Biodiversity Areas Overlay map of the planning scheme is 1.947ha

n Clearing associated with the project is limited and in most instances results in retention of the canopy or the temporary clearing to facilitate construction. Consequently, while the project would result in the clearing of 1.266ha of ground truthed Category B regulated vegetation in addition to 124 scattered trees, the overall structure and function of ecosystem would be maintained. The clearing only represents ~0.1% of all remnant vegetation at the site

While the overall project footprint is relatively small it is nonetheless located within an important area of bushland within Council’s managed estate. The project would result in a Significant Residual Impact for Matters of Local Ecological Significance (MLES) and as such offsets would be triggered under the Environmental Offsets Act 2014. Given this, and the importance of the location, impacts would be offset in a manner that exceeds the minimum 3:1 ratio required under Brisbane City Council’s offset framework. While the project would result in the permanent loss of some vegetation, all losses would be accounted for through the use of offsets and other impacts would be addressed through proposed mitigation measures. Other actions to enhance ecological values would therefore ensure that the project results in an environmental gain.


55

The Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy has confirmed in writing that it is satisfied that the proposed vegetation clearing in Category B area associated with the proposed zipline development meets the requirements of section 22A(2)(d) of the Vegetation Management Act 1999.

10.2.2 Indigenous and Cultural Analysis Summary

In view of the cultural and spiritual significance of the Kuta-Baneraba precinct and the Honey-Bee Dreaming Site to the Turrbal people, the Mt Coot-tha Zipline Project (Turrbal Historical and Cultural Analysis), prepared by Maroochy Barambah and Ade Kukoyi for Turrbal Assoc. Inc., recommended: n That Brisbane City Council opens meaningful and genuine discussions with the Turrbal representatives aimed

at preserving the spiritual and cultural values of the area for future generations n That the removal/clearing of vegetation which may be associated with the proposed zipline project site be

monitored by Turrbal personnel upon commencement of work n That activities (including ground-disturbance) in the Kuta-Baneraba precinct that may impact on the Turrbal

cultural values (particularly, the intangibles outlined in ss. 2 & 3 above) be monitored by Turrbal personnel n That Turrbal representatives prepare/deliver Cultural Awareness to Brisbane City Council and/or its contractors

involved in the works prior to construction The Turrbal Association has no objection to the proposed Mt Kuta Zipline project on the condition that Brisbane City Council adheres to the above recommendations.

10.2.3 Bushfire Risk Management Plan Summary

A Bushfire Hazard Assessment and Risk Management Plan (BRAMP) was prepared on behalf of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd in respect of the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline. In summary, the BRAMP found that: n The proposed zipline facility is a risk-appropriate development for its location in a bushfire hazard risk area, as

the development relies directly on placing people and infrastructure in a rugged, forested landscape that is intrinsically bushfire prone

n A range of risk mitigation and management measures are proposed with a priority given to ensuring that risks to human life are maintained at a tolerable level, whilst not unnecessarily impacting on the area’s environmental values

n Residual (i.e. unmitigated) risks to the infrastructure elements of the proposed zipline facility have been accepted as a necessary commercial risk by the proposed operator

n The establishment and operation of the proposed zipline facility would provide a tolerable bushfire risk outcome provided that the bushfire risk management recommendations presented in the BRAMP are implemented

10.2.4 Acoustic Impact Assessment Summary

MWA Environmental were engaged by Ethos Urban on behalf of Brisbane City Council to prepare a Noise Impact Assessment for the Mt Coot-tha Zipline project. The report considered the noise impact of the proposed development on nearby noise sensitive receptors. In conclusion the report found that: n This report supports an application for development approval to Brisbane City Council. This report considers the

noise impact of the proposed development including outdoor patron noise impacts on nearby noise sensitive receptors

n The predicted resultant noise levels from the Scenic Zipline, Treetop Canopy Tour, Suspension Bridge, Boardwalk and Arrival Centre and associated car parking and bus transfer noise satisfy the relevant noise (planning) criteria for day, evening and night-time noise limits at surrounding sensitive zone boundaries

n The proposed development complies with the noise limits based upon attenuation due to distance from noise sensitive uses, surrounding topography and existing noise sources in the locality. The development results in relatively minor increases in noise within the proposed use areas and on the basis that the development


56

assessment has been conducted on worst case maximum patron throughput per hour, the overall cumulative predictions are very conservative

n The noise from construction activities is recommended to be managed through a Construction Phase Noise Management Plan which incorporates the recommendations of the Ecological Assessment reports and shall provide suitable noise management measures including buffers and timing of specific activities to prevent unacceptable noise amenity impacts

In summary the assessment undertaken demonstrates that the proposed development can operate in accordance with the relevant noise amenity standards. It is recommended that a Noise Management Plan form part of day to day operation of the use to manage and minimise noise impacts of the use in a structured manner.

10.2.5 Traffic Impact Statement Summary

SLR Consulting were engaged by Ethos Urban on behalf of Brisbane City Council to provide traffic engineering advice in relation to the Mt Coot-tha Zipline project. Based on the analysis documented in the Traffic Impact Statement, the following was concluded by SLR Consulting: n The peak car parking demand of 145 spaces anticipated for the project can be accommodated by 102 off-street

spaces within the Arrival Centre car park and 43 on-street spaces located along Sir Samuel Griffith Drive adjacent to the arrival centre

n The project would provide several transport infrastructure improvements across the study area including revised traffic arrangements at the Mt Coot-tha Summit Lookout, improvements to the on-street arrangements along Sir Samuel Griffith Drive, and a new public shuttle bus service with stops at various locations across the Mt Coot-tha/Botanic Gardens precinct

n The project provides adequate provisions for the anticipated service vehicles movements n The design of access, car parking and servicing arrangements satisfies the relevant TAPS PSP and AS2890.1

criteria n The development is forecast to generate up to 212 trips (inclusive of shuttle bus movements) during the

peak hour period, which is equivalent to just over three trips per minute. In consideration of the generally low traffic volumes on roads within the study area, and that the peak development traffic demand is likely to occur outside network peak periods on weekends, and be dispersed across several external intersections (i.e. not all focused on a single intersection with the exception of the arrival centre access), traffic generated by the project is unlikely to cause any foreseeable operational issues

n The traffic and transport aspects of the proposed development have been assessed against the relevant requirements of the Brisbane City Plan 2014 TAPS Code and the QLD SDAP Codes, and are considered to satisfy all of the relevant outcomes

10.2.6 Visual Impact Assessment Summary

Insight DAS were engaged by Ethos Urban on behalf of Brisbane City Council to undertake a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for the proposed Mt Coot-tha zipline development. This assessment’s purpose was to identify and rate the significance of potential visual impacts from the proposed development. The visual setting of the proposed development is the landscape of Mt Coot-tha and the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha. Relevantly, the actual ‘footprint’ of the proposed development comprises only a minor extent of the total site area and a very small part of the Mt Coot-tha landscape. Specifically, within the context of the broader parent lot, the lease for the development ‘footprint’ covers approximately 1% of the total Mt Coot-tha precinct. It was determined that the aspects of the proposed development which have the potential to generate visual impacts of any significance would be: n The suspension bridge component of the Skywalk (including the pylons and patron activity on the bridge) n The launch platform, the zipline course, and the landing zone facilities of the Scenic Zipline component,

particularly in terms of visible structures and activity n The arrival centre, particularly in terms of visible structures n Areas of vegetation removal associated with the above project components


57

Visibility mapping and field investigations allowed identification of representative receptor viewpoints. The receptor viewpoints were identified to enable a comprehensive assessment of impacts and they reflect viewpoints that are at a range of distances, elevations, and orientation relative to the proposed development. Photomontages were prepared to inform the assessment of impacts, particularly the magnitude of change in the visual environment (refer example photomontages Image 5 above; Image 14 and Image 15 below). The photomontage viewpoints were selected to illustrate how the proposed development would appear from locations that were expected to be particularly sensitive to change and to also provide an overall understanding of how the proposed development would appear from a range of viewpoints at varying distances, elevations and orientations in relation to the proposed development. In general terms the photomontages revealed the following: n The proposed development would reflect a very minor disturbance (negligible in some views) of the wider Mt

Coot-tha landscape n The colour treatments of the Scenic Zipline structures (the launch platform, the intermediate tower, the landing

platform, and the kiosk) effectively blend the structures into surrounding vegetation n The proposed vegetation around a number of the project components would effectively screen the structures

and built form and integrate them with the landscaping. The proposed vegetation is shown on the photomontages with approximately five years of growth. As those plants continue to mature they would further screen and integrate the structures and built form

n The lines of the Scenic Zipline would not be visible (to the naked eye) from distant viewpoints. It appears that they become difficult to discern from anything further than 100 metres

n The Scenic Zipline launch structure would not substantially protrude above skyline vegetation at the summit. There would be some protrusion when seen from some locations, but not so much as to make the structure ‘stand out’ against the skyline

n The intermediate tower would sit above surrounding vegetation and protrude above the skyline when seen from some viewpoints. Importantly, the skyline around the intermediate tower is not part of the more valuable Mt Coot-tha skyline

n The Scenic Zipline launch structure is difficult to discern from more distant viewpoints (e.g. from more than two kilometres away)

n While a number of trees are being removed or pruned to accommodate the proposed development, it is not easy to discern obvious areas of clearing (except where the trees are replaced by structures). This is largely because the vegetation across Mt Coot-tha is relatively dense (meaning the gaps created by removed trees are either screened or ‘backed-up’ by trees that are to be retained) and because the areas of tree removal are spread across a relatively large geographic extent

n A lighting design has been prepared for the project including photomontages, to enable a more particular assessment of impacts from lighting. The night time photomontages confirm that the lighting of the Scenic Zipline launch platform and public viewing platform would be limited to surface lighting of the platform deck and would have limited visibility and visual impacts in night-time views from or to Mt Coot-tha

n The proposed launch platform has been placed as far to the southeast as possible to minimise impacts on the views northeast from the Summit Lookout towards the CBD and Moreton Bay

n The launch platform has been designed to present as a lightweight and permeable structure to minimise the obstruction of views in other directions from the existing Summit Lookout

n The launch platform and zipline course has been sited and designed to minimise the need for vegetation clearing whilst maintaining operational viability;

n The line of the top of the roof of the platform aligns with the ground level of the platform of the existing lookout. The result of using this height limit is that the roof visually aligns with the top of the existing trees in that location when viewed from the lookout platform, as demonstrated in the photomontages lodged with the development application, which was a design intention to reduce visual impact. It also means that people standing at the Summit Lookout would be able to ‘see over’ the proposed launch platform


58

Image 14: Photomontage - View showing the proposed lighting concept for the launch platform and scenic lookout

Image 15: Photomontage - Aerial view looking into the city from above the scenic lookout and launch platform down the

zipline course

Image 16: Image representing the new view that would be available from the proposed lookout and launch structure to

the south.


59

Based on the independent advice as set out above, the proposed project aligns with the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Master Plan 2018 and with Our Shared Vision Mt Coot-tha 2030. For these reasons, Insight DAS is of the view that the visual impacts from the proposed development are not so significant as to warrant refusal of the application. Furthermore, the assessment confirmed that the proposed development would generate some notable benefits with regard to visual amenity, including: n The launch structure incorporates a viewing platform that would be accessible to the public and would offer new

views towards the CBD and to the south of the summit n The zipline experience would offer a new way of visually engaging with views from the summit and of engaging

with the Mt Coot-tha landscape n The landing platform and the kiosk are attractive components which would provide a visual focus and

opportunities for novel engagement at the western end of the Botanic Gardens n The Skywalk suspension bridge would be another component which would offer a new way of visually engaging

with views from Mt Coot-tha, including to the city, and of engaging with the Mt Coot-tha landscape n The launch structure incorporates a publicly accessible viewing platform which would provide a lookout

opportunity that is different to that achieved from the existing lookout area. This lookout platform would provide expansive and entirely unobstructed views across Brisbane’s eastern and southern suburbs, extending as far as the eye can see (refer Image 15 and Image 16 above). Such a viewing opportunity would be unique and become a highly valued part of the Mt Coot-tha experience

Image 17: Aerial image showing relationship of proposed launch structure and main views from existing lookout

towards the CBD


60

10.2.7 Heritage Impact Statement Summary

Urbis was engaged by Ethos Urban, on behalf of Brisbane City Council, to prepare a Heritage Impact Statement (HIS) for the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline development. Mt Coot-tha Forest is entered in the Queensland Heritage Register (QHR) as a State Heritage Place (QHR No 602446). The proposed works for the zipline are within the Heritage Boundary of this Heritage Place. The entry in the QHR for Mt Coot-tha Forest references the gold mine remnants in the western part of the forest and the World War II sites near JC Slaughter Falls. Mt Coot-tha Lookout and kiosk is also entered in the QHR as a State Heritage Place (QHR No 601564). Although none of the proposed works are within the Heritage Boundary of this Heritage Place, parts of the works are nearby and may have an impact on the cultural heritage significance of the place as a development adjoining a Heritage Place. The Richard Randall Art Studio, within the Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha, is also entered in the QHR as a State Heritage Place (QHR No 600299). The Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha is hatched on the Brisbane City Council Heritage Overlay Map as a local heritage place but it is not included in the Brisbane City Council Heritage Register. Urbis noted that the hatching is assumed to be over the whole of the lot on which the Richard Randall Art Studio sits, and the Heritage Boundary of the local heritage place has not been reduced to align with the heritage boundary of the State Heritage Place. The Visual Impact Assessment report and photomontages referenced above have been prepared to assess and represent the potential impact of the proposal on views to and from Mt-Coot-tha and the visual amenity of the area. These confirm that the proposal would have a minimal impact on the significant views to and from the relevant heritage places. The impact of the construction phase of the project would be minimal. Existing trails provide access to most of the proposed areas of construction and some structural elements would be lowered in by helicopter. The archaeological potential in the areas where the zipline is to be located is considered to be low. The identified gold mining remnants are on the western side of the forest, well away from these proposed works. The WWII remnants are below the Suspension Bridge and would not be impacted by the proposal. Developing a Chance Finds procedure in case archaeological resources are uncovered is recommended in the HIS. The development of the proposed Mt Coot-tha Zipline would have a minimal impact on the cultural heritage significance of the relevant Heritage Places.

10.2.8 Stormwater Management Plan Summary

The conceptual Stormwater Quality Management Strategy presented in the Stormwater Management Plan broadly outlines the planning, management and maintenance issues for the selected stormwater treatment measures. An assessment of the strategy demonstrated that adequate treatment of stormwater at the site is readily achievable. Sufficient consideration of stormwater controls has been made at the conceptual design stage of the development to demonstrate compliance with: n Brisbane City Council’s Stormwater code within the City Plan 2014 (Brisbane City Council 2014a) n Queensland Government’s State Planning Policy Water Quality Objectives (DILGP 2017), section 3.1.2 Modelling results indicate that the option proposed at the arrival centre would result in a significant decrease in stormwater pollutant loads, with removal targets being achieved for total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total nitrogen and gross pollutants. The bioretention system is already located on the site and the final location of the proposed gully baskets would be determined as part of detailed design.


61

The various components of the development would not give rise to an increase in stormwater runoff that would necessitate the inclusion of detention storage to attenuate flows or to avoid the concentration of flow: n The arrival centre would be built on an already impervious existing car park and the slight increase in

impervious area associated with the staff facilities would result in a negligible increase in runoff in the catchment n The shade structure at the commencement of the tree-tops tour would result in a minimal increase in runoff

compared to the existing situation n The take-off and lookout area at the start of the zipline would be made from permeable materials and set above

the existing ground; the works would therefore result in no significant increase in impervious area or runoff n The zipline landing platform and kiosk would drain overland to an existing lake which would attenuate any

increase in runoff resulting from the platform or kiosk n The suspension bridge would be permeable to allow rainfall to drain to the existing ground; as such the bridge

would not cause an increase in runoff Overall, the use of existing drainage systems and the incorporation of water sensitive design elements (sheet flow instead of pipes, permeable walkways) would result in the development producing a negligible increase in runoff compared to the current situation.


62

11 Asset Management

Details about asset management have been provided both for the proposed infrastructure to be constructed and for additional areas within the Mt Coot-tha site. Section 11.1 details the proposed zipline infrastructure and the responsibilities for maintenance.

11.1 Proposed Asset Management

Proposed Infrastructure Details Responsibility The Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline launch and viewing platform

Launch and viewing platform structure and walkways Trustee lessee

Mt Coot-tha Scenic Zipline landing deck and exit zone

Landing deck structure and walkways Trustee lessee

Treetop Tour departure point Shelter and start infrastructure platform Trustee lessee Treetop Tour finish landing platform Landing platform structure and walkways Trustee lessee

Cloud Stations 1-7, Ground-based Landings 8-9 (refer Treetop Tour – Course Layout, below)

Cloud Station 1 Trustee lessee Cloud Station 2 Trustee lessee Cloud Station 3 Trustee lessee Cloud Station 4 Trustee lessee Cloud Station 5 Trustee lessee Cloud Station 6 Trustee lessee Cloud Station 7 Trustee lessee Ground-based landing 8 Trustee lessee Ground-based landing 9 Trustee lessee

Suspension bridge Suspension bridge Trustee lessee

Arrival Centre

Reception Trustee lessee Lockers and adjacent toilet facilities Trustee lessee Safety briefing area Trustee lessee Gear store and gear preparation areas Trustee lessee Dispatch lounges Trustee lessee Gift shop Trustee lessee


63

Image 18: Treetop Tour - Course Layout


64

11.2 Ongoing Asset Management Areas

The table below details the existing areas at Mt Coot-tha that Brisbane City Council is responsible for managing and maintaining.

Code Group Nodes Visitor Services Maintenance Category

Responsibility Frequency

Visitor Facility

JC Slaughter Falls Picnic Area Specialist High Profile Brisbane City Council (BCC) Twice weekly

Simpson Falls Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Hoop Pine Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Silky Oak Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Brush Box Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Grey Gum Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Range View Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Gold Mine Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Gap Creek Reserve Picnic Area Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly Summit Lookout Specialist High Profile BCC Twice weekly The Hut Environment Centre car park High Profile BCC Weekly City view area above quarry SSG Dr High Profile BCC Weekly Bielby Rd and Gap Creek Rd gate entrances High Profile BCC Weekly

Crag Rd and Brosley Rd High Profile BCC Weekly

Other Special Feature

JC Slaughter Falls Bush Chapel High Profile BCC Weekly JC Slaughter Falls Biker Memorial General Profile BCC Fortnightly JC Slaughter Falls Ammo Bunker General Profile BCC Fortnightly JC Slaughter Falls Dam Area General Profile BCC Fortnightly Aboriginal Art Trail, art works General Profile BCC Fortnightly Brush Box Picnic area – 20-year anniversary bushland acquisition program memorial

General Profile BCC Fortnightly

Ghost Hole Trail - Historical artefacts General Profile BCC Fortnightly

Other Access Point

Sir Samuel Griffith Dr High Profile BCC Weekly Gap Creek Rd High Profile BCC Weekly Highwood Rd High Profile BCC Weekly Russel Tce & Chapel Hill Rd High Profile BCC Weekly Flemming Rd & Bielby Rd High Profile BCC Weekly Crag Rd and Broseley Rd block 1 High Profile BCC Weekly Bus turn around area Gate W32 SSG Dr High Profile BCC Weekly THECA Gate W60 Flemming Rd High Profile BCC Weekly Fire access around TV stations ABC,7,9,10 High Profile BCC Weekly Fire access Bardon area Patten Rd, Barnett Rd, communications tower General Profile BCC Weekly

Fire access Taringa area, Block one General Profile BCC Biannual Fire access Blackstone St General Profile BCC Biannual Fire access Chapel Hill area General Profile BCC Biannual Other - As per Conservation Reserves Atlas General Profile BCC Biannual

Pathway - Walking Trail

Aboriginal Art Trail High Profile BCC Quarterly Hovea Track General Profile BCC Biannual Summit Track High Profile BCC Quarterly Honeyeater Tack High Profile BCC Quarterly Butterfly Track General Profile BCC Biannual Simpson Falls Track High Profile BCC Quarterly Eugenia Circuit High Profile BCC Quarterly Jacksonia Track General Profile BCC Biannual Ghost Hole Track High Profile BCC Quarterly Fairywren Circuit General Profile BCC Biannual Trinder Road Track General Profile BCC Biannual Lace Monitor Track General Profile BCC Biannual Kingfisher Track General Profile BCC Biannual Kulgan Circuit General Profile BCC Biannual Patten Road Track General Profile BCC Biannual Maculata Track General Profile BCC Biannual Stringybark Track General Profile BCC Biannual Pinnacle Track General Profile BCC Biannual


65

Code Group Nodes Visitor Services Maintenance Category

Responsibility Frequency

Themeda Track General Profile BCC Biannual Dogwood Track General Profile BCC Biannual Golden Orb Track General Profile BCC Biannual

Elevated Structure - Deck Simpson/Eugenia Bridge & Viewing Deck High Profile BCC Quarterly

Pathway – Mountain Bike Trail

Tunnel Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Rocket Frog Trail High Profile BCC Quarterly Dingo Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Skink Link General Profile BCC Biannual Bandicoote Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Whipbird Way High Profile BCC Quarterly Wallaby Way General Profile BCC Biannual Koala Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Wagtail Way General Profile BCC Biannual Echidna Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Cubberla Creek Trail High Profile BCC Quarterly Gap Creek Circuit High Profile BCC Quarterly Glider Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Death Adder Trail General Profile BCC Biannual Pipeline Trail High Profile BCC Quarterly Mountain Bike Skills area Gap Creek High Profile BCC Quarterly

Other - Water Feature

East Ithaca creek - JC Slaughter Falls Picnic area General Profile BCC Biannual

West Ithaca creek - Simpson Falls Picnic area General Profile BCC Biannual

Gordon Road Dam General Profile BCC Biannual

Fire Break Maintenance

Boobook Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Tallowwood Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Quarry Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Bardon Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Powerful Owl Trail High Profile BCC Weekly Currawang Street Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Boulder Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Python Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Moggil Road Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Highwood Road Trail High Profile BCC Weekly Quail Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Boscombe Road Trail High Profile BCC Weekly Gold Creek Trail - plus Wongajong Trail to gate W90 General Profile BCC Monthly Jones Road Trail High Profile BCC Weekly Goanna Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Iron Bark Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Curlew Circuit General Profile BCC Monthly Cockatoo Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Bellbird Trail General Profile BCC Monthly Kokoda Track General Profile BCC Monthly

Natural Vegetation

Northern Escarpment (Highwood Rd Track to Bardon) Specialist High Profile BCC Quarterly

Southern Escarpment (Kokoda Trail to Freeway) Specialist High Profile BCC Quarterly

Ithaca Ck Catchment Specialist High Profile BCC Quarterly Toowong/Taringa Bushland Specialist High Profile BCC Quarterly Western Escarpment (Highwood Rd Track to Kokoda Trail) Specialist High Profile BCC Quarterly

Bushland West of Gap Ck Rd Specialist High Profile BCC Quarterly


66

11.3 Ongoing Maintenance Planned

The table below details the service outcomes of the ongoing maintenance at Mt Coot-tha.

Maintenance Area Maintenance Outcomes

Safety hazards and risks Reduce natural area hazards, minimising potential damage to staff, users and assets Garden beds Ensure garden beds are free of weeds to maximise the health of plants and minimise disease.

Gardens retain original planting intent Mulching Maintain mulch to maximise plant health, soil condition and suppress weed germination Tree care Maintain safe and healthy trees with safe lines of sight in and around visitor node Turf care Maintain turf areas to promote a healthy, pest and disease-free surface Restoration planting The objective of restoration planting is to retain or improve biodiversity in natural areas. Maintenance

of these plantings aims to ensure the success of this core objective Pest and disease control Minimise pest and disease impacts and dispersal in natural areas Environmental weed control Minimise weed impacts to retain or improve biodiversity of natural areas Illegal dumping Natural areas are maintained and free of illegally dumped rubbish, materials and green waste Encroachment removal Natural areas are to be free of all unauthorized structures, materials and gardens Litter removal Natural areas are to be reasonably free of litter and safe Visitor node and hard surface cleansing

Visitor nodes and associated surfaces in visitor nodes are to be reasonably clean, safe and functional. Hard surfaces are constructed surfaces but not earth tracks

Asset cleaning

All assets within the park are maintained in a clean and safe condition suited to public use. This includes: • Toilets • Structures and furniture • BBQs • Special features and artworks • Signage

Graffiti removal Parks are free of graffiti Sharps collection Natural areas shall be maintained in a safe condition free of sharps Natural area infrastructure maintenance

• Barriers and fences • Gates and entries • Toilets • Structures and furniture • BBQs • Utilities • Signage

Track and trail maintenance • Recreational tracks and trails (walking tracks and Mountain bike trails) • Management access trails • Track monitoring and equipment maintenance • Water tanks pumps and fittings • Drainage lines, creeks and water bodies • Playground and nature play area maintenance

Fire Management • Wildfire suppression • Hazard reduction burning • Temporary fire access trail construction • Fire equipment maintenance


67

12 Monitoring and Revision

This LMP for the DOGIT, Lot 2 on SP241566, is intended to be in effect for 20 years from the date of approval. The plan requires monitoring and revisions at appropriate intervals. In accordance with Land Management Planning Kit, this plan is to be reviewed as follows: n The findings and recommendations should be reviewed approximately every five years, with the first review in

2023 n The proposed actions should be reviewed annually and updated as required n Inspections of the site should be performed in line with Council’s service delivery standards, which currently

involve annual inspections of all lease areas, to evaluate the progress made in implementing and complying with this LMP

Inspections of the site are to be performed by Council to ensure that the land is being managed in accordance with this LMP and Council’s standards. Consultation with the future trustee lessee and the local community should be conducted to an appropriate level where necessary. The regular monitoring and revision of this LMP should ensure that: n Public access to and use of the site is maintained n Council maintains up-to-date data on the site n Community concerns relating to issues such as site condition and impacts of use are identified and resolved

promptly in line with Council’s service delivery standards n The safety and security of the land is maintained n The maintenance of the site and its infrastructure meets community expectations and relevant standards, where

they exist n Future upgrades occur in accordance with this LMP and other planning instruments, including the Brisbane City

Plan 2014 n Sound environmental management and sustainability principles and practices are maintained Any amendments to this plan should be submitted to DNRME as necessary.

draft land management plan mt coot-tha zipline · organised events), hiking (including the annual...

Documents