Download - TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Transcript
Page 1: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences

Presented ByMr. Guy Gribble

General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC

Page 2: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

They Are The Same, Only Different DeparturesHoldingArrival ManeuveringApproachesMissed Approaches

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Page 3: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

They Are The Same, Only Different Physics, Aerodynamics, MathematicsUnits of Measure

US Customary Units vs. MetersConversions ?

Rounding of NumbersFix Tolerances and AccuracyFlight Technical Errors

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Page 4: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Who is In Charge Here ? State (Country)

Aeronautical Information Publication, AIPFlight Check, MaintainPublish, Revise

Design CriteriaStandard design developmentRole of the Procedure DesignerPilot operational procedures

ICAO, International Civil Aviation OrganizationSARPS vs. Documents

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Page 5: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Where Does This Data Come From ? • State (Country)• Commercial Provider• WGS-84 Compliant ?

AirportCountrySomewhere ?

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Page 6: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

RussiaChina

India

Page 7: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Standard Instrument Departure “Normal” OperationsMaintain the Ground TrackMaintain the Required Climb Gradient

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

XXX

XXX

Page 8: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. Pans-Ops vs. FAR 25Standard Instrument Departure • Vertically Speaking

Departure End Of Runway

DER15?

1,500 Feet AFL

5 M

MSA

35 Ft ?

MSA

Page 9: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • If straight out will not work…

Climb faster over obstacleTurn away from obstacleKeep in sight, “See and avoid”Climb in a safe sector away from obstacleSpeed limitingCombinations of any of the above

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Page 10: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

152 Feet per NM OCS 48 Feet per NM ROC 200 FEET PER NM

DER

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • Climb Faster Over Obstacle

Requires 350'/NM Until Reaching MSA

Maintain 4.3% Until Reaching 1700MSL

MSA

35 Ft ?

.8% MOC

3.3%

2.5% OIS

MSA

5 M

Page 11: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • Turn Away From Obstacle

≈ 2 NM

Initial Climb Area

≈ 3.5 KM

Area 1

500' 500'

15˚ Splay

Page 12: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • Turn Away From Obstacle

≈ 2 NM

Initial Climb Area

≈ 3.5 KM

Area 1

500' 500'

15˚ Splay

Page 13: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure, TERPS• Keep in Sight and Tell Pilot to "See and Avoid"

15˚ MAXTake Off Minimums

800/2

Visual Climb Over Airport

Hazard Beacons on top of hill to the east

clearly visible or Take Off Minimums

600/1

X

Page 14: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

15˚ MAXNo Departure Turns

East

Diverse Departure Evaluation

X25 or 46 NM

Standard Instrument Departure, TERPS• Climb in a Safe Sector

Page 15: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

X

Standard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops• Climb in a Safe Sector

Page 16: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

No Turns Eastbound

X

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops• Climb in a Safe Sector

Page 17: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • “Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA TERPS

Page 18: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • “Minimum Sector Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops

Page 19: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsStandard Instrument Departure • “Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops

Page 20: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsTERPS vs. PANS-OpsHolding • Timing

PANS-Ops

TERPS

>14,000 = 1.5 Minute ≤ 14,000 = 1 Minute

Page 21: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

>14,000 = 240>6,000≤ 14,000 = 220 KIAS ≤ 6,000 = 210

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsTERPS vs. PANS-OpsHolding • Speeds

>34,000 = IMN.83>20,000 ≤ 34,000 = 265 KIAS>14,000 ≤ 20,000 = 240 KIAS ≤ 14,000 = 230 KIAS

PANS-Ops

TERPS

265 230/210KIAS

200 KIAS

Page 22: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsHolding • Evaluated Airspace

Page 23: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Definitions and Use ofEntry Procedures

Evaluated AirspaceObstacle Clearance

SpeedsSelection of Turn

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures

Page 24: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Holding In lieu of

Teardrop10 NM Limit

80/260

45/180

Racetrack

Base TurnTurn point

Entry Sector

80/260

45/180

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures

Page 25: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, TERPS

Entry Procedure

Page 26: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops

Entry Sector Defined

Page 27: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops

"Omni-Directional" Defined

Page 28: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsEvaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, TERPS

Page 29: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

4.6 km

(2.5 NM) 4.6 km

(2.5 NM)

1 min./45-180Procedure turn area

Secondary area

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsEvaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, PANS-Ops

Page 30: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

All = 14.29˚ SPLAY

VOR = 7.8˚ SPLAYNDB = 10.3˚ SPLAY

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsEvaluated Airspace Final Segment, Non-Precision

Page 31: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

350 No Final Approach Fix 300

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsApproach Procedures

300 Final Approach Fix 250200 Precision Approach 200

Page 32: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds

Page 33: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsArrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds

Page 34: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsVisual Approaches and Visual Maneuvering

Definition ofUse for

Evaluated AirspaceOCA/ROC

SpeedsVisual Aids and Cues

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Page 35: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops"Visual" vs. Circle-to-Land

Definition ofUse for

Evaluated AirspaceOCA/ROC

SpeedsVisual Aids and Cues

MDA vs. Descent Point

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

Page 36: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

394‘AFL

300‘AFL

“C” 4.2 NM“D” 5.28 NM

“C” 2.68 NM“D” 3.49 NM

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

1.7 NM 2.3 NM

Page 37: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Page 38: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Page 39: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Page 40: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Page 41: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Page 42: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsCircling Approaches and Maneuvering

Pans-Ops

Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight

C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM

D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM

TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*

C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM

D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM

With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles

OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)

Page 43: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

Page 44: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

Page 45: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

AzoresGermany

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for

navigation.

GreeceSouth Korea

JapanCanadaMexico

Venezuela

Saudi Arabia

Page 46: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Intermediate Missed Approach

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsMissed Approach Procedures

Missed Approach

Requires 3.7% Climb

Page 47: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

Intermediate Missed Approach

TERPS vs. PANS-OpsMissed Approach Procedures

Page 48: TERPS  vs.  PANS-Ops

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops

Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences

Presented ByMr. Guy Gribble

General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLCwww.InternationalFlightResources.com


Top Related