Overview 10 minutes
Goals 10 minutes
Objectives 10 minutes
Performance based approach 10 minutes
Complexity 20 minutes
Tools Exercise
15 minutes
Conclusion 5 minutes
SESSION PLAN
Low
Em
issi
ons
Land
Use
Pla
nnin
g D
evel
opm
ent T
eam
AcknowledgementsName Affiliation Name AffiliationDavid Saah; Co-Lead University of San Francisco, SIG Phan Xuan Thieu Vinh University, Vietnam
Mohd Zaki Hamzah; Co-Lead University Putra Malaysia Chalita Sriladda USAID-LEAD
Khamla Phanvilay, Co-Lead National University of Laos Hoang Thi Thu Duyen Vietnam Forestry University, Vietnam
Cao Thuy Anh Dalat University, Vietnam Ladawan Puangchit Kasetsart University, Thailand
Chalermpol Samranpong Chiang Mai University, Thailand Do Anh Tuan Vietnam Forestry University, Vietnam
Pham Thanh Nam USAID LEAF Vietnam Lyna Khan Royal University of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Peter Stephen USAID LEAF Bangkok Le Ba Thuong Vietnam Forestry University, Vietnam
Hoang Vinh Phu Vinh University, Vietnam Napat Jakwattana University of Phayao, Thailand
Vipak Jintana Kasetsart University, Thailand Nur Anishah Binti Aziz University Kebangsaan Malaysia
Kulala Mulung PNG University of Technology Ratcha Chaichana Kasetsart University, Thailand
Somvilay Chanthalounnavong National University of Laos Sureerat Lakanavichian Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Thavrak Huon Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia Vongphet Sihapanya National University of Laos
Athsaphangthong Munelith USAID LEAF Laos David Ganz USAID LEAF Bangkok
Attachai Jintrawet Chiang Mai University, Thailand Chi Pham, Project Coordinator USAID LEAF Bangkok
Chanin Chiumkanokchai USAID LEAF Bangkok Kent Elliott US Forest Service
Lam Ngoc Tuan Dalat University, Vietnam Beth Lebow US Forest Service
Mark Fenn USAID Vietnam Forests & Deltas Geoffrey Blate US Forest Service
Low Emission Land Use Planning (LELUP)Section 1. Enabling Environment
1.3. Planning & Development Goals & Objectives
Regional Climate Change Curriculum Development
LELUP Framework
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT CONDITION
ANALYSIS OF FUTURE
OPTIONS
NEGOTIATING &
PRIORITIZINGIMPLEMENTA-
TION PLAN
MONITORING & EVALUATION
Low Emission Land Use Planning
1.1. Regulatory Assessments
1.2. Stakeholder Engagement
1.3. Planning & Development Goals & Objectives
2.1. Environment, Social, & Economic Data Needs
2.2. Understanding Historic Land Use Change
2.3. Data & Capacity Gap Assessment
3.1. Modeling Future Trends
3.2. Business as Usual Baseline Construction
3.3. Scenario Assessment
4.3. Implementation Needs
4.2. Priorities & Sequence Implementation Activities
4.1. Negotiating Agreement on Options
5.1. Establish M&E Framework
5.2. Monitor & Measure Progress
5.3. Evaluate, Report & Adapt
Learning Objectives
At the end of this session, learners will be able to:
Identify Elements Necessary for LELUP
Identify GOALS
Identify OBJECTIVES
Learning Domains
Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati
on Plan
Land Use Planning
Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS)
Conservation Planning
GHG Accounting
Understanding Historical Land Use Change
Low Emission Land Use Planning
Identify Goals
Goals are formal statements that detail the desired impact of the plan and are:
Linked to targets
Impact orientated
Specific
Measurable
Time limited (generally 10 years or more)
Identify Objectives
Objectives are formal statements detailing the desired outcomes of the plan and are:
Results orientated
Practical
Specific
Measurable
Time limited (generally three to ten years)
Results Based Management
Results-based management is a strategic management approach used to plan, cost, implement, monitor and measure the changes from cooperation, rather than just the inputs provided or activities conducted.
Net
em
issio
ns p
er y
ear
Historical emis-sions
Reference Level
Monitored Emissions
Initiation of REDD+ Ac-tivities
Past Future Time
Results Based Management
Source: UN+REDD Vietnam, 2013
Rules of the GameObjective:Rules of the Game
FOOTBALL EXAMPLE
Group Discussion
Why is it important to set Goals and Objectives for a Low Emission Land use Planning (LELUP) process?
What might be a goal and objective for a LELUP process?
Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati
on Plan
Factors that should be considered For Goals and Objectives
Understanding CONTEXT A future VISION of the landscape. Description of CRITICAL FACTORS. Establish CRITERIA.
Objective 1
Understand that will have many objectives Maximize positive impact Minimize negative impact Optimize all impact
Multi-objective
Objective 2
Objective 3
Qualitative versus Quantitative
Early in the Planning Process
Increased carbon storage
Positive economic growth
Improved drinking water accessibility
Later in the Planning Process
10% increase over 3 years
2.5% growth increase per year
2 new wells in remote villages per year
Accommodating higher level goals
Some goals may already be established by an existing plan at a higher level
National
Province
District
Accommodating lower level plans
Some goals may already be established by an existing plan at a lower level
Commune
Province
District
Vertical & Horizontal Harmonization in Lam Dong Province, Vietnam
Provincial SEDP: increase
annual GDP from 12-15%
National Vietnam Policy: maintain 60% forest cover
Provincial SEDP: reduce
population growth to
1.3%
Bao Lam SFC: actively manage 17,300 ha production forest
Local Communities: PFES contracting to protect specific forest areas
Lam Dong Province Land Use
Plan
Lam Dong Province Case Study Goals
National Influencing Factors
Within 10 years:
1. 20% GHG reductions
2. 20% economic growth
3. Lower poverty rate by 20%
4. Mainstream REDD+ into FPDP
Local Influencing Factors
1. PFES in place in several Districts
2. State Forest Companies manage both production and protection of forest
Group Discussion
Which of the previous goals are qualitative versus quantitative?
Should or can the quantitative goals be refined? How or Why?
How do we develop an integrated LE LUP?
Lam Dong Province Case Study Goals
Environmental
1. Maintain 61% forest cover by 2015
2. Take proactive action to cope with climate change
3. Maintain or improve ecological integrity
Lam Dong Province Case Study Goals
Economic1. Increase annual GDP growth
rate from 12 to 15%
2. Increase GDP per capita to 2300 USD by 2015
3. No poor households by 2020
Lam Dong Province Case Study Goals
Social1. Reduce population growth
to 1.3% (2015) and 1.2% (2020)
2. 85% of rural populations will have access to fresh water by 2015 and 100% by 2020
3. Number of malnutrition under 5 years of age reduced to less than 5% by 2020.
Group Discussion
Which of the previous goals are qualitative versus quantitative?
Should or can the quantitative goals be refined? How or Why?
How do we develop an integrated LE LUP?
Any method or tool that gets stakeholders communicating is a successful one Be creative Different tools or methods
may be needed for different stakeholders
Methods/Tools
Methods/Tools
The Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation http://www.conservationmeasures.org/
Expected Outcomes from Stakeholder Analysis
A contextual understanding of LU LEP
Setting objectives that stakeholders can measure their needs against
Expected Outcomes
A common vision.
Identify major ‘drivers’ and inter-connections.
FOREST
WatershedFARM
PARK
FARM
City
Prov
enceProvence
What are the challenges in meeting these outcomes?
Common Challenges
National level policies and strategies may have set arbitrary GHG emission reduction targets which are expected to be met at the sub-national level.
The need to quickly access funds creates goals and targets that can be unrealistic.
The development of goals and objectives is considered a one-of process.
Emerging Opportunities
Low Emission Land Use Planning can align incentives for cross-sectorial integration
References
Discussion on Enabling Environment:
GIZ (2011) Land Use Planning: Concept, Tools and Applications
Mekong River Commission (2011), (2011) Manual for Training Trainers in IWRM in the Mekong Basin - Training Manual.
Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation
