Transcript
Page 1: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of

Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas

Professor David M. Pozar

Electrical and Computer Engineering

University of Massachusetts Amherst

Amherst, MA 01003 USA

[email protected]

Page 2: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Outline

1. Minimum Q of electrically small antennasa. Definition of radiation Qb. Early resultsc. Statements from the literatured. Two types of circular polarizatione. Some derivationsf. Summary of results

2. Maximum gain of an arbitrary (non-supergain) antennaa. Statements from the literatureb. LP and CPc. Degrees of freedom and directionalityd. Summary of some resultse. Cross-polarization of optimal gain antennas

Page 3: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Definition of Q for a resonant circuit:

e m

rad

W WQ

P

Definition of radiation Q for an antenna:

2 when

2 when

ee m

rad

me m

rad

WW W

PQ

WW W

P

Definitions of Q

We and Wm are the total stored electric and magnetic energies, Prad is the radiated power. We and Wm are the stored energies modified to exclude the (infinite) energy of the antenna radiation field.

Page 4: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Reasoning: When the electric and magnetic stored (non-radiative) energies are not equal, the antenna is not resonant. Presumably, an external matching element will be used to cancel the non-zero antenna reactance, and this will increase the stored energy of the smaller of (electric or magnetic) energy, making the total energy equal to twice that of the larger of the original (magnetic or electric) energy.

Example: A small electric dipole has a large capacitive reactance, and its stored electric energy is larger than its stored magnetic energy. Matching can be done with a series inductor, which will increase the magnetic energy of the system to equal the stored electric energy. Note: other matching techniques are possible, but these may further increase stored energy.

e mW W

small dipolecapacitive reactance

small dipoleinductively matched

Le m mW W W

Page 5: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Impact of this definition:

It is this definition of radiation Q that leads to different values of Q for different electrically small antennas.

Right now we know of only two possible values of minimum Q for small antennas:

or

The first value results for electric or magnetic dipoles (TM or TE modes, one or more), while the smaller value results when using a superposition of TM and TE modes.

0 3

1Q Q

ka

0 3

1 1/ 2

2Q Q

ka

Page 6: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Early Results

Chu (1948): Used spherical modes to derive results for minimum Q and maximum gain (without supergain) for small arbitrary omnidirectional antennas (LP, CP-Type 2). Approximations limit accuracy for multi-mode cases.

Harrington (1958, 1959): Used a similar analysis to derive results for the minimum Q and maximum gain for directional antennas (LP only).

Collin and Rothschild (1964): Improved rigor of previous analyses by eliminating infinity caused by stored energy of radiating field.

Fante (1969), McLean (1996): Simplified method for properly accounting for infinite energy in radiated field, and allowed calculations to be accurately extended to multiple TM and TE modes

Page 7: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

From the recent literature (relative to the minimum Q of an electrically small arbitrary antenna). . .

“...the lowest achievable Q for a circularly polarized antenna (using TM and TE modes)... is one-half of the radiation Q associated with the TM mode acting alone” – from an article in APS May 1996.

“... the radiation Q of a small circularly polarized antenna is about one half of the Q of a small linearly polarized antenna” – from an article in APS May 2005

“Another paper (the above reference) claims that orthogonal TE and TM modes produce a gain of 3 and a Q half that of either mode. Both are in error; the input power and the peak power density are both doubled, leaving the gain at 1.5 and the Q that of one mode.” – from a book published in 2006.

“...(for) collocated, time quadrature electric dipoles ... the calculated Q ... (is) less than that of a single dipole” – from an article in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1995.(later papers by these authors claim that the Q may approach zero for some configurations)

“It is shown that the results obtained by (the above authors) are based on incorrect hypothesis and are wrong”, from an article in JEWA 1998.

Page 8: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Questions . . .

a. Which small antenna configurations have a minimum Q ofand which have a value half of this ?

b. Do all small CP antennas have a lower value of Q than single mode LP antennas ?

c. Does reduced Q depend on polarization ?

d. Is it possible to have a small antenna with reduced Q (Q0 /2), and directionality (G = 3) ?

0 3

1Q

ka

Short Answers: a. TM or TE; TM and TE; b. no; c. no; d. yes

Page 9: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

z

x

Jz Mz

Type 1 Type 2

Jx

Jy

x

z

Type 1 uses two orthogonal electric (or magnetic) dipoles with 90º phasing (TM or TE)

Equivalent Elementary Dipole Sources for Two Types of Circular Polarization

Type 2 uses collinear electric and magnetic dipoles (TM and TE)

Page 10: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Examples of Type 1 CP Antennas (TM or TE only)

Crossed dipoles(or turnstile antennas)

Microstrip patch with orthogonal feeds (probes, apertures, or lines)

Crossed slots

Page 11: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Examples of Type 2 CP Antennas (TM and TE)

Helix AntennaDipole – Loop Antenna Monopole-slot(Clavin element)

Page 12: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

The same categories (Type 1 – either TM or TE modes, or Type 2 – TM and TE modes) can also be applied to linearly polarized antennas. Depending on orientation and phasing, it is possible to obtain linear, circular, or elliptical polarization from combinations of electric dipoles (TM modes), magnetic dipoles (TE modes), or electric and magnetic dipoles (TM and TE modes).

Type 1 and Type 2 Also Apply to Linear Polarization

Page 13: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Spherical Vector Potentials for Arbitrary TM and TE Dipole Modes

21

21

ˆ sin cos sin sin cos

ˆ sin cos sin sin cos

r

r

A h kr a b c

F h kr d e f

Jx Jy Jz

Mx My Mz

Page 14: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Derivation of Q for Jz and Mz (Type 2: CP)

2 3

3 2

2

1 1sin

2 1cos

1sin

jkr

jkrr

jkr

jk jE e

j r r kr

jE e

kr r

jH e

kr r

2

2 3

3 2

1sin

1 1sin

2 1cos

jkr

jkr

jkrr

jE e

kr r

jk jH e

j r r kr

jH e

kr r

Fields for TM01 Mode (Jz): Fields for TE01 Mode (Mz):

Obtain CP by multiplying TE01 fields by ±jη and adding to TM01 fields.

Page 15: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

2

2 2 2

0 0

3 3

sin2

4 2 1

3

e rad

r a

W E E r drd d

ka k a

Compute Non-Propagating Stored Energies

2

2 2 2

0 0

3 3

sin2

4 2 1

3

m rad

r a

W H H r drd d

ka k a

Non-radiating electric and magnetic energies are equal in this case.

Note: The radiated energy density is subtracted from the total energy density. It is incorrect to subtract the radiated field from the total field.

Page 16: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Compute Radiated Power and Q

22 2

0 0

1sin

16

3

rad radP E r d d

3 3

2 2 1 1 2

2e m

rad rad

W WQ

P P k a ka

For small antennas, this is approximately equal to 0 3

1 1/ 2

2Q Q

ka

Page 17: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Derivation of Q for Jx and Jy (Type 1: LP or CP)

2 3

2 3

2 3

sin 2 2cos sin

cos 1cos sin

1 1sin cos

jkrr x y

jkrx y

jkrx y

jE I I e

j r kr

jk jE I I e

j r r kr

jk jE I I e

j r r kr

11 sin cos

cos1 cos sin

jkrx y

jkrx y

jH I I e

r kr

jH I I e

r kr

Fields for TM Modes (Jx and Jy with arbitrary amplitudes):

Page 18: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Compute Non-Propagating Stored Energies

Non-radiating electric energy is greater than the magnetic energy in this case.Note that the results are independent of β.

3 3

8 1 1

3eWka k a

8 1

3mWka

Set 1 and . Then / 2 for CP; 0, for LP.jx yI I e

Page 19: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Compute Radiated Power and Q

For small antennas, this is approximately equal to- twice the previous result.This result is independent of β.

0 3

1Q Q

ka

16

3radP

3 3

2 1 2e

rad

WQ

P k a ka

Page 20: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Summary of Q for TM and TE Modes(lowest order modes)

eW mW radP Q

03 3

1 1

2

P

k a ka

0 1

2

P

ka

0P

3 3

1 1

k a ka

0 1

2

P

ka

03 3

1 1

2

P

k a ka

0P

3 3

1 1

k a ka

03 3

1 2

2

P

k a ka

03 3

1 2

2

P

k a ka

02P3 3

1 1 2

2 k a ka

ResonantTM + TE

InductiveTE

CapacitiveTM

ReactanceSources

0

8

3P

Note that if we used , all three cases would have the same Q. e m

rad

W WQ

P

Page 21: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

From the recent literature (relative to the maximum gain of an arbitrary finite non-supergain antenna) . . .

“It is interesting to note that in the special case of all the spherical modes adding in phase in the far field, the antenna must be linearly polarized” – from an article in APS November 2006.

“The maximum gain of 3 can be obtained only for linear polarization.” – from an article in APS May 2005

“Another paper claims that orthogonal TE and TM modes produce a gain of 3 and a Q half that of either mode (above reference). Both are in error; the input power and the peak power density are both doubled, leaving the gain at 1.5 and the Q that of one mode.” – from a book published in 2006.

Maximum Gain of an Arbitrary Antenna

Page 22: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Questions . . .

a. Does the maximum gain of an optimum arbitrary (non-supergain) antenna depend on polarization ?

b. How do we obtain maximum gain from a CP antenna ?

c. What can we say about the polarization properties of an optimal maximum gain arbitrary antenna ?

Short Answers: a. no; b. use TM and TE sources; c. cross-pol is identically zero

Page 23: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Omni-Directional Bi-Directional Directional

Three Types of Optimum Patterns for Maximum Gain Arbitrary Antennas

Page 24: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Maximum Gain for These Optimal Antennas

Electrically small:

Arbitrary size:

21

1

2 1/ 2 0

1

1.5, 2.81, 4.10, ...

N

nnodd

nG P

n n

20 2

3, 8, 15, ...

G N N

2 2

02

1.5, 4.0, 7.5, ...

N NG

Bi-Directional Directional

2 2, sin

1.5

F

G

22 , 1 cos

3.0

F

G

2 2, 1 cos

1.5

F

G

Omni-Directional

N ka

Page 25: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Degrees of Freedom, Maximum Gain, and Polarization

No degrees of freedom...A single dipole is linearly polarized, and has a maximum gain of 1.5

One degree of freedom...Two orthogonal TM (or TE) dipoles may be phased to produce LP or CP, but will produce a bi-directional pattern with a gain of 1.5or...A TM dipole and a TE dipole can produce an LP directional (cardioid) pattern, with a gain of 3.0

Two degrees of freedom...Two orthogonal TM dipoles and two orthogonal TE dipoles can be phased to produce CP and a directional pattern, with a gain of 3.0

Page 26: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Conclusions regarding maximum gain and polarization:

The above results for the maximum gain of arbitrary omnidirectional, or directional, antennas apply to any polarization.

But one degree of freedom is required to generate CP (either Type 1 or Type 2), and one degree of freedom is required to obtain directionality (TM and TE modes). Achieving both requires two degrees of freedom (two TM sources and two TE sources).

Limiting the number and type of sources limits the type of polarization and the maximum gain that may be obtained.

Page 27: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Maximum Gain and Minimum Q for Various Combinations of Elementary Sources

0

31/( )Q ka

Sources Polarization Pattern Max Gain Min Q

Jz (or Jx, or Jy) LP-1 Omni 1.5 Q0

Mz (or Mx, or My) LP-1 Omni 1.5 Q0

Jz ± Mz LP-2 Omni 1.5 Q0/2

Jz ± My LP-2 Directional 3 Q0/2

Jz ± j Mz CP-2 Omni 1.5 Q0/2

Jz ± j My LP-2 Bi-directional 1.5 Q0/2

Jx ± j Jy CP-1 Bi-directional 1.5 Q0

Mx ± j My CP-1 Bi-directional 1.5 Q0

Jx ± j Jy and Mx ± j My CP-2 Directional 3 Q0/2

Page 28: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Cross-Polarization of Maximum Gain Arbitrary Antennas

1 11

0 11

2 cos cos

sin

jkrn jn n

RHCP nn

e P PE j a e

r

0LHCPE

.

Co-pol and cross-pol far-fields of an optimum gain arbitrary CP antenna:

The co-pol and cross-pol far-fields of an optimum gain arbitrary LP antenna are:

1 1

10 1

1

cos cos ˆ ˆcos sinsin

jkrn n n

cp nn

e P PE j a

r

0xpE

ˆ ˆˆ cos sincpu ˆ ˆˆ sin cosxpu Using Ludwig’s Third Definition for cross-pol:

(cross-pol field is identically zero)

Cross-pol field is identically zero, if Ludwig’s definition is used. This makes sense in terms of optimality, but also gives validation to Ludwig’s definition.

Results from “Polarization of maximum gain antennas”, IEEE APS, July 2007.

Page 29: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Overall Conclusions

It is possible to achieve reduced Q for electrically small antennas by employing both TM and TE modes, regardless of polarization.

It is possible to achieve maximum gain for an arbitrary (non-supergain) antenna, with a directional pattern, for any polarization, by using at least two modes of each type, to give at least two degrees of freedom.

An optimal arbitrary maximum gain antenna will have no cross-polarization in the far-field.

Page 30: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Transmit vs. Receive Antennas

All of the above results apply only to transmitting antennas.

We (Kwon and Pozar) have recently developed corresponding optimal results for arbitrary receiving antennas, and this work has been submitted for publication.

Page 31: New Results for Minimum Q, Maximum Gain, and Polarization Properties of Electrically Small Arbitrary Antennas Professor David M. Pozar Electrical and Computer

UMass Antenna Lab

Thank You !


Top Related