Download - Meniscal repair
IndicationsRim width - Distance of meniscal tear from
meniscosynovial junction-Warren & Arnockzy< 3 mm-high rate3-5 mm - variable >5 mm – not suitable for repairCannon-Success rate 74% with rim widths 2
to 3.9mm , 50 % with rim widths 4 to 5 mm
Favourable factors for healingYoung patientsAcute traumaLongitudinal tearsIncomplete tearsTears < 8 mm
Poor success rate is withChronic degenerative tearsACL deficient knee-DeHaven-failure rate 46%
vs 5%in stable knee over 10-year study Cannon-83% success rate combined meniscus repair & ACL reconstruction compared to overall success rate of 75%
Older age groupAxial malalignment
Open repairTear in posterior third of meniscusTraumatic separation of meniscosynovial
junctionRoutine arthroscopy
Tears are unappreciatedNon anatomic repair
Results-Cannon et al100% success rate for stable kneeChronic tears-failure rate 33%Acute tears –failure rate 14%
Results-Outside in repair -Warren et al87% successful outcome69%-Asymptomatic-complete healing18%-Slightly symptomatic-partial healing13%-Meniscus failed to heal
Advantages - Outside in repairRisk of articular cartilage damage is lessPrecise placement of suturesVertical placement of suturesExcellent visualisationInjury to saphenous vein and nerve avoidedEasy access to anterior portion of meniscusUseful for suturing meniscal replacement
Disdvantages - Outside in repairDifficult to put perpendicular sutures in far
posterior partMulberry knot may potentially abrade the
articular surface before absorptionPermanent sutures must be brought through
anterior portalExperience is needed for accurate placement
of needle
Complications-Outside In repairNerve injury-Common peroneal nerve and
saphenous nerveLimitation of extensionInfectionFailure to heal-avascularity,degenerative
tear,instability,inadequate stabilization of tears,obliquity of sutures,lack of early protection,repeat injury
Inside out repairMore difficult due to limited space
Inside out repair-Lateral meniscus
Complications- Inside out repairNeurovascular injuryArtcicular scuffing and coring of meniscus by
cannulas and needles
All inside repairIndications are similar to open meniscal
repairAdditional posteromedial and posterolateral
portals requiredSpecialized equipments and intraarticular
suture tying skills are required
Meniscal arrowSelf reinforced Polylactic acidBegins to degrade in 4-6 months , absorbed
in 18 –24 monthsPull out strength comparable to horizontal
mattress sutures
Results-Meniscal arrow Kristensen et al
Meniscal repair in avascular zoneMarc Rubman et al-25%-Healed,38%-Partially
healed,36%-Failed ,Clinically-80%-asymptomatic
DeHaven-Healing enhancement techniques
Overall ResultsEvaluation-Clinical,Arthrography ,MRIHenning-75% failures were asymptomatic Cannon-50% failures were asymptomatic Morgan-All anatomic failures were
symptomaticIncompletely healed but stable menisci
behave clinically as completely healed menisci and should not be rated as failures
Overall ResultsTear length- Failure rate-15%-<2cm , 20%-
2to3.9cm , 59%-4-5cmTime of repair- Failure rate-17%-< 8 weeks
28%-> 8 weeksSide of repair-Failure rate-Lateral-16% ,
Medial repair-30%
Overall ResultsSuture material-Barrett et al –Failure rate-
Nonabsorbable-0%,Absorbable- 18% Warren and Morgan-Comparable results with both sutures
Ability to remain healed over time-Eggli et al-7.5 years f/u 73% meniscus survival rate DeHaven-10 years f/u 79% survival rate
Overall ResultsBiomechanical function- weightbearing AP
radiographs in extension and 45 degree flexion - 85% were normal
Fibrin glue-Ishimura et alFibrin glue-Tear in vascular area and is not
degeneratedFibrin glue containing marrow cells-Tear in
avascular areaFibrin glue containing marrow cells with
suturing-Degenerative tear
Fibrin glueSolution A-Purified dense
fibrinogen,Aprotinin,factorXIIISolution B-Thrombin,CaCl2
Gene Therapy-Hideyuki Goto et alTissue engineered meniscal tissueTransgeneHealing in avascular zone can be improved
by transfer of genes encoding appropriate growth factors
RehabilitationControversy-Accelerated rehab protocol vs
conservative approachBasic science studies and animal studies – in
favour of accelerated protocol-Klein et al,Dowdy et al
Clinical studies-Shelbourne et al,Barber-No difference in rates of healing between two
Asahina et al – Concern about clinically asymptomatic partially healed tears
Rehabilitation-Scott et al Tailoring the post op protocol to the type of
meniscal tearBucket handle and vertical longitudinal tearsRadial and complex tears
THANK YOU
Collagen scaffold-Kevin et alTemplate for the regeneration of meniscal
cartilage