Transcript

International Negotiations on Liability and Redress

Overview of presentation

Overview of process Process in the future What do we want? Why do we want this at international level? Issues on the negotiating table Way forward for us?

Overview of Process Article 27 of Biosafety Protocol establishes

mandate for current negotiations A Working Group was established by COP/

MOP1 in 2004 mandate to:-review information relating to liability and redress

for damage resulting from TBM of GMOs;Analyse general issues relating to potential and/or

actual damage and scenarios of concern; Elaborate options for elements of rules procedures

on liability and redress

Where is the process? 4 WG meetings have

already taken place 4th meeting in Montreal in

October 2007, which focussed on elaboration of options for rules and procedures referred;

Working document of 53 pages in Annex II of report of meeting

Process in the future Next WG meeting in Bogotá, Colombia 12-

19 March 2008-final WG meeting Report to the COP/MOP 4 in May 2008

Bonn Deadline expires when need to adopt

international rules and procedures

What is important to us?

What do we want?

System/scheme for victims to get compensation

System to achieve redress Ensure that risks to human health,

environment and socio economic harm is covered

Promote prevention of damage

Why?-because of problems with national laws These are poorly

enforced, are not just, create difficulties for victims to overcome legal hurdles such as causation; the foresee ability test, multiple sources of damage and are too restrictive/inadequate

Access to justice

Issues on the negotiating table (1) International rules and procedures that

are binding vs. guidelines Scope: damage from TBM or damage

from transport, handling, use, transit Definition of damage damage from TBM

or damage from adverse impacts of GMOs on conservation, sustainable use of biodiv, taking also into account the risks to human health (BSP objective)

Issues on negotiating table (2)

Scope of damage:

Effects on environ, human health, socio economic damage, costs of prevention, restoration measures=this does not imply liability, only what can be claimed

More issues….

Strict liability vs. fault based liability Exemptions to liability Compulsory insurance Limitations on liability Joint and several liability

Way forward for us?

What can we do for Colombia meeting?

Research from Latin America on the linkages of glyophosate as inextricable part of GMO-in international law context

Scandalise the Glyphosate contamination Research from Latin America on socio-

economic impacts of GMOs in the context of liability and redress and why we need a strong regime?

Further planning for COP MOP Strategise how we

wish to use the existing infrastructure for COP MOP Bonn preparations to push our agendas

An international regime will take another 2-3years or more to be concluded… in the meanwhile, we have to continue or local, national, and regional struggles.


Top Related