Transcript
Page 1: Interferometry  Basics

Interferometry Basics

Andrea IsellaCaltech

Caltech ALMA Community DayPasadena, March 16, 2011

Page 2: Interferometry  Basics

References

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

• Thompson, A.R., Moran, J.M., & Swensen, G.W. 2004, “Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy” 2nd edition (WILEY-VCH)

• NRAO Summer School proceedings– http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/events/synthesis/2010/lectures10.html

(in particular D.Wilner lecture)– Perley, R.A., Schwab, F.R. & Bridle, A.H., eds. 1989, ASP Conf. Series 6, Synthesis

Imaging in Radio Astronomy (San Francisco: ASP)• Chapter 6: Imaging (Sramek & Schwab), Chapter 8: Deconvolution (Cornwell)

• IRAM Summer School proceedings– http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/IS/archive.html– Guilloteau, S., ed. 2000, “IRAM Millimeter Interferometry Summer School”

• Chapter 13: Imaging Principles, Chapter 16: Imaging in Practice (Guilloteau)– J. Pety 2004, 2006, 2008 Imaging and Deconvolution lectures

• CARMA Summer School proceedings- http://carma.astro.umd.edu/wiki/index.php/School2010- CARMA SUMMER school, July 2011, ask J. Carpenter for information

Page 3: Interferometry  Basics

1. An Interferometer measures the interference pattern produced by two apertures.

2. The interference pattern is directly related to the source brightness. In particular, for small fields of view the complex visibility, V(u,v), is the 2D Fourier transform of the brightness on the sky, T(x,y)

From Sky Brightness to Visibility

(van Cittert-Zernike theorem) T(x,y)x

y

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

uv plane

Fourier space/domain

Image space/domain

image plane

Page 4: Interferometry  Basics

| V|

b (meters)0

0.5

1

b1

=/bb1b2

=/b

b2

phase

Visibility and Sky Brightness

The visibility is a complex quantity:- amplitude tells “how much” of a certain frequency component- phase tells “where” this component is located€

V =Imax − IminImax+Imin

=Fringe Amplitude

Average Intensity

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Page 5: Interferometry  Basics

Vb (meters)

0

0.5

1

b1

b1

Visibility and Sky Brightness

b2b3

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

The visibility is a complex quantity:- amplitude tells “how much” of a certain frequency component- phase tells “where” this component is located€

V =Imax − IminImax+Imin

=Fringe Amplitude

Average Intensity

Page 6: Interferometry  Basics

2D Fourier Transform Pairs

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

T(x,y) |V(u,v)|

Gaussian

Function Constant

Gaussian

Page 7: Interferometry  Basics

2D Fourier Transform Pairs

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

T(x,y) |V(u,v)|

ellipticalGaussian

sharp edges result in many high spatial frequencies

ellipticalGaussian

Disk Bessel

Page 8: Interferometry  Basics

CARMA A-array configuration

θ = 0.15’’ at 1.3 mm

2 Km1.2 miles

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Need for high angular resolution

Single telescope Array of N telescopes

Angular resolution, θ ~ λ/D ~λ/Dmax

Collecting area ~ D2 ~ ND2

10-3

10

-2

10-1

1

00 1

01 1

02

EVLA

ALMA

θ (‘’

)

λ (μm)10-1 100 101 102 103 104

HST

Spitzer

VLTI

Herschel

CARMA

Keck

SMA PdBI

CCATD=50 m

Page 9: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Aperture Synthesis

V(u,v) can be measured on a discrete number of points. A good image quality requires a good coverage of the uv plane. We can use the earth rotation to increase the uv coverage

Page 10: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Synthesized beam

′ T (x,y) = W (u,v)V (u,v)e2πi(uv+vy )dudv∫∫Discrete sampling:

The weighting function W(u,v) is 0 where V is not sampled

T’(x,y) is FT of the product of W and V, which is the convolution of the FT of V and W:

B(x,y) is the synthesized beam, analogous of the point-spread function in an optical telescope.

′ T (x,y) = B(x,y)⊗T(x,y)

B(x,y) = W (u,v)e2πi(uv+vy )dudv∫∫

Page 11: Interferometry  Basics

11

Synthesized Beam (i.e.,PSF) for 2 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 12: Interferometry  Basics

12

3 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 13: Interferometry  Basics

13

4 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 14: Interferometry  Basics

14

5 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 15: Interferometry  Basics

15

6 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 16: Interferometry  Basics

16

7 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 17: Interferometry  Basics

17

8 Antennas

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 18: Interferometry  Basics

18

8 Antennas x 6 Samples

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 19: Interferometry  Basics

19

8 Antennas x 30 Samples

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 20: Interferometry  Basics

20

8 Antennas x 60 Samples

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 21: Interferometry  Basics

21

8 Antennas x 120 Samples

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 22: Interferometry  Basics

22

8 Antennas x 240 Samples

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

Page 23: Interferometry  Basics

23

8 Antennas x 480 Samples

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Effects of a sparse uv coverage

The synthesized beam approaches a 2D gaussian function and can be described in terms of its Full Width at Half

Maximum (FWHM) and Position Angle (PA)

Page 24: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Characteristic angular scales1. An interferometer has at least THREE important characteristic angular scales:

- angular resolution: ~ λ/Dmax , where Dmax is the maximum separation between the apertures.- shortest spacing problem: the source is resolved if θ>λ/Dmin, where Dmin is the minimum separation between apertures.

An interferometer is sensitive to a range of angular sizes, λ/Dmax - λ/Dmin

andsince Dmin> Aperture diameter, an interferometer is not sensitive to the large angular scales and cannot recover the total flux of resolved sources (you need a single dish, e.g., CSO, APEX, IRAM 30 m, ALMA total power array, CCAT).

2. Field of view of the single aperture ~ λ/D, where D is the diameter of the telescope. Source more extended than the field of view can be observed using multiple pointing centers in a mosaic.

Page 25: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Primary beam and Field of View

A telescope does not have uniform response across the entire sky- main lobe approximately Gaussian, fwhm ~1.2/D = “primary beam”

- limited field of view ~ /D

Page 26: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Characteristic angular scales during ALMA early science

Band λ λ/Dmax λ/Dmin FOV

3 3 mm 2.5’’ 30’’ 50’’

6 1.3 mm 1’’ 13’’ 22’’

7 0.9 mm 0.75’’ 9’’ 15’’

9 0.45 mm 0.37’’ 4.5’’ 8’’

Dmax = 250 m, Dmin = 20 m, D = 12 m

1. How complex is the source? Is good (u,v) coverage needed? This may set additional constraints on the integration time if the source has a complex morphology.

2. How large is the source? If it is comparable to the primary beam (l/D), you should mosaic several fields (NOTE that during early science ALMA will have limited mosaicing capabilities)

Page 27: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

From visibilities to images

visibilities dirty image sky brightness

deconvo

lve

Fourier tr

ansform

• uv plane analysis– best for “simple” sources, e.g. point sources, disks

• image plane analysis– Fourier transform V(u,v) samples to image plane, get T’(x,y)– but difficult to do science on dirty image– deconvolve b(x,y) from T’(x,y) to determine (model of) T(x,y)

Page 28: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Weighting function

′ T (x,y) = B(x,y)⊗T(x,y)

B(x,y) = W (u,v)e2πi(uv+vy )dudv∫∫

Measured flux:

Synthesized beam:

You can change the angular resolution and sensitivity of the final image by changing the

weighting function W(u,v)

Page 29: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Weighting function

• “Natural” weighting: W(u,v) = 1/σ2(u,v), where σ2(u,v) is the noise variance of the (u,v) sample:

Advantage: gives the lowest noise in the final image, highlight extended structures.

Disadvantage: generally gives more weights to the short baseline (where there are more measurements of V) degrading the resolution

• “Uniform” weighting: W(u,v) is inversely proportional to the local density of (u,v) points. It generally gives more weights to the long baseline therefore leading to higher angular resolution. Advantage: better resolution and lower sidelobes

Disadvantage: higher noise in the final map

• “Robust” (Briggs) weighting: W(u,v) depends on a given threshold value S, so that a large S gives natural weighting and a small S gives uniform weighting.

Advantage: continuous variation of the angular resolution.

Page 30: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Weighting functionN

ATU

RAL

WEI

GH

TIN

G

UN

IFRO

M W

EIG

HTI

NG

FWHM beam size = 1.7’’ x 1.2’’ 0.21’’ x 0.19’’

Page 31: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Deconvolution: Dirty Vs Clean imageA non complete coverage of the uv plane gives a synthesized beam with a lot of sidelobes, i.e. a ‘dirty’ beam. And since

,

T’(x,y) is also characterized by sidelobes, i.e., ‘dirty’ image.

′ T (x,y) = B(x,y)⊗T(x,y)

The deconvolution process consists in giving reasonable values to the visibility in the unmeasured (u,v) areas in order to get a nice gaussian beam without sidelobes. The most successful deconvolution procedure is the algorithm CLEAN (Hogbom 1974).

Deconvolution or CleaningDirty image Clean image

Page 32: Interferometry  Basics

Andrea Isella :: ALMA community day :: Caltech, March 16, 2011

Concluding remarks

• Interferometry samples visibilities that are related to a sky brightness image by the Fourier transform

• In planning your observations keep in mind these three important scales: λ/Dmax , λ/Dmin, λ/D

• remember… there are usually an infinite number of images compatible with the sampled visibilities. Play around with the weighting functions while using the ALMA simulator

• Deconvolution (e.g. cleaning) try to correct for the incomplete sampling of the uv-plane. Play around with ‘clean’ while using the ALMA simulator


Top Related