Transcript
Page 1: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business

12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013

Volker Leisse

Telecommunications Consultant

Page 2: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Who is Cable Europe Labs?

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 3: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Cable Europe Labs by the Numbers

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

27.7

15,3

12,5

7,1

4,1 3,2 2,9 2,4 1,5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

LGI/UPC KDG Virgin Ono Ziggo Zon Telenet Com Hem YouSee

Source: Cable Europe Labs, Company Reports, Eurostat

Europe – total (EU27)

Population: 503 mill Households: 211 mill Homes Passed: 110 mill Customers: 65 mill Service Subscribers: 76 mill

Page 4: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Mission and Goals of Cable Europe Labs

Focus on technologies with 18 to 24 month time horizon Span end-to-end network from core infrastructure to home

connectivity Cover complete development process

Technology assessment Specification and standardization Equipment certification

Leverage collective scale to influence cable technology development and to attract attention from important and/or innovative vendors

Involve relevant stakeholders to identify important technology trends and to link them to business and commercial requirements of members

Strong cooperation with partners such as CableLabs® and coordination of related standardization efforts

Represent members interests in technology regulation matters together with Cable Europe

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 5: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Overview

Drivers for change Platform optimization DOCSIS 3.1 – technology highlights Network evolution

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 6: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Drivers for Change

Increased demand on network capacity High speed data services

Trendline establishes ~ 50% annual growth in downstream Similar annual growth in upstream

Linear broadcasting services Additional TV programs (particularly HD)

On-demand services – “Anytime” Growing Video on Demand libraries with improved and graphically intensive user

interfaces including search and recommendation engine Network DVR Catch-up services; personalized programming

More over IP – “Anywhere” Second and third screens are increasingly IP devices Address individualization in user behavior

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 7: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Platform Optimization

Residential Services

Business Services

DOCSIS 3.0 Channel Bonding

EPON / GPON / P2P

CCAP High-density

Headend

DOCSIS 3.1 New PHY

Distributed Architecture

All Fiber

EPoC / GPoC

Time © Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 8: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Converged Cable Access Platform - CCAP

Router

Rcvr

CMTS Core

Laser

Nar

row

cast

Bro

adca

st

Ups

trea

m

Unicast

Com

bine

r

EQAM Analog

Ups

trea

m

DS

Unicast & Narrowcast & Digital Broadcast

Services

CCAP Analog

Today’s Headend (modular architecture)

Headend with CCAP (integrated routing)

Rcvr Laser

CMTS + EQAM = CCAP

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 9: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Distributed Architecture

Approach: move (some) components from the headend closer to the customer (e.g. into the optical node) More efficient usage of DOCSIS capabilities in significantly improved network

conditions Avoid active components in coaxial network (node+0 architecture) Enable migration towards digital optics

Mini-CMTS/CCAP Fully functional device with smaller form factor and limited performance to be

deployed in the field Number and location of devices results in significant concerns about reliability,

robustness and management simplicity cost driver Requirements established by network operator; no interoperability issue; no

specification issue Remote PHY

PHY layer signal processing moved to the field; most or all MAC layer functionality remains in headend

Requires new interfaces to enable interoperability (UEPI, Timing Protocol, etc.) Likely to be addressed via CableLabs specification

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 10: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS 3.1 Project

New version of DOCSIS specifications (version 3.1) Development project managed by CableLabs® Active participation of cable network operators and

equipment manufacturers Key factors for success: vendor contributions and alignment with

operator requirements

Cable Europe Labs facilitating review of technical proposals by European MSOs and contribution of requirements

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 11: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS 3.1 Objectives

Specification of technologies enabling Efficient support of 10+ Gbps of downstream capacity and 1+ Gbps

upstream capacity Significant reduction in cost per bit delivered compared to current

DOCSIS technology Adaptation to different amounts of available spectrum and plant

conditions Orderly migration strategy Efficient delivery of services to both residential and business

customers Improved energy efficiency features such as low power standby and/or

sleep modes

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 12: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS 3.1 Technology – Higher Capacity

Main mechanisms New error protection algorithms and higher modulation orders Operation across larger bands of spectrum

Effects Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) enables higher order modulation even in

current networks Increase in spectral efficiency

More bits/second/Hz in current plant conditions (e.g. noise, reflections) Same capacity at worse plant conditions (more subscribers can be reached with

higher tier services)

Simple example 8 bits /symbol with 256QAM 12 bits/symbol with 4096QAM = 50% capacity

increase Currently about 50 Mbps per 8 MHz channel (or about 4.7 Gbps per 862 MHz

plant) then about 75 Mbps per 8 MHz spectrum (or about 7 Gbps total)

Spectrum enhancement ~ 500 MHz of downstream spectrum at 10 bps/Hz (net throughput) for ~ 5 Gbps

capacity in DOCSIS 3.1 vs. ~ 780 MHz for 5 Gbps with DOCSIS 3.0

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 13: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS 3.1 Technology – Robustness, Flexibility, Cost Reduction Main mechanism

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex (OFDM) for Upstream and Downstream

Effects Transmission of multiple narrow sub-carriers in a

frequency block (‘OFDM channel’ or ‘OFDM symbol’)

Each sub-carrier individually adjustable in modulation order and FEC to accommodate

Plant conditions (e.g. older network parts) Disturbances (e.g. LTE interference) Spectrum availability (e.g. co-existence with legacy

services) Flexible spectrum usage not restricted to 6/8 MHz

channels; incremental capacity additions Improved scaling to large bandwidth compared to

bonding single carrier QAM channels (SC-QAMs) Mature technology used in many other platforms

(notably mobile technologies) Economies-of-scale and larger vendor community

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

OFDM DS PHY channel

Sub-

carr

ier -

256

QAM

Su

b-ca

rrie

r - 2

56 Q

AM

Sub-

carr

ier -

512

QAM

Su

b-ca

rrie

r - 5

12 Q

AM

Sub-

carr

ier -

102

4 Q

AM

Sub-

carr

ier -

409

6 Q

AM

Sub-

carr

ier -

409

6 Q

AM

Sub-

carr

ier -

102

4 Q

AM

Page 14: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS 3.1 Technology - Migration

Backward compatibility Support of at least 24 bonded SC-QAMs in downstream and 8 in

upstream S-CDMA in the upstream DOCSIS 3.1 CMs required to operate on DOCSIS 3.0 CMTSs DOCSIS 3.1 CMTSs required to support DOCSIS 3.0 (and 2.0) CMs To be implemented also with CCAP equipment

Operation on existing HFC networks Upstream spectrum remains below downstream Supports operation with existing upstream splits (42/65 MHz as mostly

in operation, 85 MHz as specified in DOCSIS 3.0) Supports spectrum enhancement in upstream (e.g. 200 MHz) and

downstream (e.g. 1.2 GHz or even 1.7 GHz) Supports the ability to take advantage of enhanced capabilities when

network, headend and CPE equipment permit

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 15: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

DOCSIS 3.1 Use Cases

Today

Few 1.0/1.1 Lots of 2.0 Some 3.0 CP

E H

eade

nd

5-65 MHz US 3.0 CMTS

DS Bonding

Soon

Remove 1.0/1.1 More 3.0

3.0 CCAP More DS Bonding

US Bonding S-CDMA

3.1 CM

Many 3.0 First 3.1

3.0 CCAP More DS & US

Bonding

3.1 DS CCAP

3.1 CCAP First 3.1 DS OFDM

DS Expansion

Lots of 3.0 More 3.1

3.1 US CCAP

First 3.1 US OFDMA

Lots of 3.1

Better HFC

US & DS Expansion

Reduction of 2.0

Considerations when introducing DOCSIS 3.1 • DOCSIS 3.0 CCAP before DOCSIS 3.1 available • First DOCSIS 3.1 CM with DOCSIS 3.0 CCAP • Introducation of DOCSIS 3.1 DS in CCAP via Firmware Upgrade • Introducation of DOCSIS 3.1 US in CCAP via Line Card swap • Expansion of frequency range particularly in US very complex

DOCSIS 3.0 CM DOCSIS 3.1 CM

DOCSIS 3.0 CMTS/CCAP DOCSIS 3.1 CMTS/CCAP

(Source: CableLabs, Comcast)

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 16: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Towards FTTH ?

Service requirements are technology agnostic customers require speed, QoS

Technologies not necessarily mutually exclusive but complementary

Advantages of DOCSIS 3.1 as a delivery platform Data rates (and supported service tiers) competitive Connectivity available Demand-driven network upgrades (‘Fiber-to-where-it-makes-sense’) Protection of existing investment

Marketing challenge: symmetric services

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 17: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Converging HFC Platforms

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

IP/Transport Network

DOCSIS OSS Servers

Data Phone Internet

HFC Network

CM CMTS DOCSIS Network

PON Network

D-ONU DPoE Network

OLT

DPoE System

PON Network

CNU DPoE Network with EPoC

OLT

DPoE System

Coax Network

OCU

(Source: CableLabs)

Page 18: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Summary and Timelines

DOCSIS 3.1 enabling Gigabit services Technical highlights

New FEC and higher order modulation for improved capacity OFDM for flexible spectrum usage and adaptation to plant conditions enabling cost

reductions Backward compatibility (support of 24x8 DOCSIS 3.0 operation at a minimum)

Initial benefits (e.g. improved spectral efficiency and flexible spectrum usage) on existing plants without changes

Full benefits (e.g. capacity enhancement and spectrum expansion) without additional exchange of equipment

Target timelines see completion of specifications in 2013 and initial products as early as 2014

Significant step in evolution of HFC networks remain competitive with alternative access technologies (on cost efficiency and capacity)

Capacity enhancements and, consequently, capital investment consistent with customer demand

Fiber connectivity to subscribers only where needed and/or economically feasible (e.g. business customers, green field)

DOCSIS 3.1 in combination with other technologies (DPoE, EPoC) creates network agnostic IP delivery platform

© Copyright Cable Europe Labs 2013

Page 19: DOCSIS 3.1 and its Influence on Business · DOCSIS® 3.1 Development and its Influence on Business 12th Broadband Technology Conference Sopot, May 2013 . Volker Leisse . Telecommunications

Thank you for your attention!

Volker Leisse ([email protected])

with special thanks to Matthew Schmitt and Curtis Knittle (both CableLabs), Mourad Veeneman (Liberty Global) and Jorge Salinger (Comcast) for allowing me to make

use of material


Top Related