Transcript
Page 1: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection

Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins

University of Gloucestershire

April 2008

Page 2: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Session structure

Introduction and activity Digital storytelling at the University of

Gloucestershire Engagement and reflection

A framework for evaluation and assessment

Page 3: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

How did you get here?

Tell a colleague your story of ‘How you got here’ in no more than 60 seconds

Then find another colleague and recount to them the story you have been told

Page 4: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Storytelling

‘storytelling is a way for storytellers to give meaning to their experiences’ (Nygren & Blom, 2001: 372)

We use narrative to: communicate with others represent and understand ourselves make sense of our experience make sense of the world around us

‘[story] construction process judgments and inferences are required at two levels: about discrete items of information and the adequacy of the unfolding story. Selecting, comparing, inferring, arranging and revising are activities which we regard as cognitive strategies’. (Robinson & Hawpe, 1986)

Page 5: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

What is a story?

‘no single structural representation of a story. However the prototypical story identifies a protagonist, a predicament, attempts to resolve the predicament, the outcomes of such attempts and the reactions of the protagonists.

Creating an effective story is therefore a matter of ‘effective causal thinking’ (Robinson & Hawpe, 1986)

‘Connected succession’ (Misher, 1995)

Page 6: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Oral vs written stories

Oral presentation is more personal – the personal voice – connection Social – allows development

‘a narrative written down by the storyteller is a more reflected expression’ (Nygren & Blom, 2001)

‘Writing introduces division and alienation, but in a higher unity as well. It intensifies the sense of the self and fosters more conscious interaction between persons. Writing is consciousness-raising’ (Nygren & Blom, 2001)

Page 7: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Digital Storytelling at the University of Gloucestershire

Digital storytelling provides a means of combining elements of these oral and written traditions:

‘the modern expression of the ancient art of storytelling (in which) stories derive their power by weaving images, music, narrative and voice together, giving deep dimension and vivid colour to characters, situations, experiences and insights’ (Leslie Rule of the American Digital Storytelling Association in Crow (2006)).

Students are also increasingly comfortable with story as a medium and a means of engagement, particularly with a more diverse and non-traditional student population (Moon, 2007).

Page 8: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Digital Storytelling at the University of Gloucestershire

Our interpretation of digital stories: Media artifacts combining still images and mp3

files The heart of digital storytelling is the development

of the story, the narrative

Combines narrative and collaboration as learning strategies with technology to enable a fresh approach to student engagement and reflection

Page 9: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Range of uses - University of Gloucestershire

Induction Reflections on design developments Reflections on personal development

Personal journeys Critical incidents

Group presentations

Page 10: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Pedagogy of storytelling

Student engagement Reflection for deep learning Effective integration of technology Project based learning (Barrett, 2006)

Page 11: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Reflection and engagement Individual reflection

focusing attention on the task storytelling process requires the organising and ordering of

thoughts emotional engagement

Storytelling can ‘encourage students to integrate feeling and thought, the subjective and objective ways in which we make judgments about our world’ (Beatty, 2000)

Within a social setting allowing students to present their ideas in a public forum

and to engage in the critiquing of their own work

Page 12: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Social Reflection

A formal setting for review of stories may help to “bring about thoughtful and reasoned change to practice” (McDrury and Alterio 2002, p111)

A studio model (Schön 1983; 1987) may assist : multiple perspectives to be explored scaffolding in a peer learning forum enhanced reflective learning enrichment of discipline-based learning communities

Page 13: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Digital storytelling, literacy and skills

‘potential to blend digital, oral, art and written literacies’

Creating ‘literally a portfolio unto itself’

Jason Ohler (http://www.jasonohler.com/storytelling/assessment.cfm)

Page 14: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Analysis of use …

Feedback from staff and students has been generally positive

But does digital storytelling work as a technique?

Can we find a workable means of evaluation and assessment?

Product vs process?

Page 15: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Evaluation using ‘Map of Learning’ (Moon 1999)

Increasing levels of reflection :

1: ‘Noticing’

2 : ‘Making sense’

3 : ‘Meaning making’

4 : ‘Working with meaning’

5 : ‘Transformative learning’

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 5

Group stories

Individualstories

Page 16: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Framework for evaluationProject planning Evidence of storyboard, critical evaluation …

Story The success of the story; Map of Learning

Media application Appropriate use of media, image selection …

Literacies Blend of different literacies

Technical delivery Length of story, sound, music … a base level

Flow, organisation and pacing

Was the story well organised?

Creativity Evidence of originality (to the student)

Emotional impact Evidence of personal engagement with the story

Citations, permissions Proper credit assigned, permissions obtained, correct citations

Academic understanding

How well it meets the academic goals

Page 17: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Plenary discussion

Page 18: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

References Barrett, H : ‘Researching and Evaluating Digital Storytelling as a

Deep Learning Tool’ http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/SITEStorytelling2006.pdf

Crow, C. (2006) Digital storytelling connects youth across cultural divides. www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/digitalphotography/prophoto/bridges.mspx (accessed 23 Jan. 2008)

McDrury, J. and Alterio, M.G. (2003) Learning through Storytelling in Higher Education Using Reflection and Experience to Improve Learning. London: Kogan Page.

Mishler, E G : ‘Models of narrative analysis: A typology’ Journal of Narrative & Life History, 5(2), 87-123

Page 19: Digital storytelling for student engagement and reflection Phil Gravestock & Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire April 2008

Moon, J. A. (1999) Reflection in Learning and Professional Development. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Moon, J. A. (2007) In press. Nygren, L & Blom, B (2001) Analysis of short reflective

narratives: a method for the study of knowledge in social workers actions, Qualitative Research, Vol 1 pp369-384

Ohler, J : ‘Storytelling, literacy and learning’ http://www.jasonohler.com/storytelling/storyeducation.cfm

Robinson, JA & Hawpe, L (1986) Narrative thinking as a Heuristic process in Sarbin, T.R. (ed) Narrative psychology: the storied nature of human conduct, Praeger Publ

Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Schön, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. New York: Jossey Bass.


Top Related